• =?UTF-8?Q?Lavrov_Calls_for_Immediately_Implementing_UN_Decisions?= =?UT

    From *skriptis@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 12 19:59:15 2023
    https://dailystormer.in/lavrov-calls-for-immediately-implementing-un-decisions-on-israel-creating-palestinian-state/




    The escalation of violence in the Middle East should provide an impetus for implementing a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.

    Speaking to journalists on Thursday, the top diplomat reiterated a call for a swift resolution of the crisis. After that, hopefully “everyone would take responsibility for implementing the decisions of the UN Security Council on the creation of a
    Palestinian state under the principles that the UN has approved.”

    “All of us had the same opinion… that this confrontation must be stopped immediately, that parties should respect international humanitarian law, prevent any terrorist actions and indiscriminate use of force,” Lavrov said.

    He stressed that civilians from both sides were suffering en masse and that the failure to create a viable Palestinian state was the root of continued tensions in the region.







    Also very interesting Bibi clip. Must see.



    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 13 03:40:02 2023
    On Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 18:59:15 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
    https://dailystormer.in/lavrov-calls-for-immediately-implementing-un-decisions-on-israel-creating-palestinian-state/




    The escalation of violence in the Middle East should provide an impetus for implementing a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.

    Speaking to journalists on Thursday, the top diplomat reiterated a call for a swift resolution of the crisis. After that, hopefully “everyone would take responsibility for implementing the decisions of the UN Security Council on the creation of a
    Palestinian state under the principles that the UN has approved.”

    “All of us had the same opinion… that this confrontation must be stopped immediately, that parties should respect international humanitarian law, prevent any terrorist actions and indiscriminate use of force,” Lavrov said.

    He stressed that civilians from both sides were suffering en masse and that the failure to create a viable Palestinian state was the root of continued tensions in the region.

    Also very interesting Bibi clip. Must see.

    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Pelle_Svansl=C3=B6s?=@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Fri Oct 13 16:15:46 2023
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.

    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the
    same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From PeteWasLucky@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 13 06:27:21 2023
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the
    same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Fri Oct 13 15:40:44 2023
    PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:> On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote: > > once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is
    wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.> For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the > same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... > > ... it
    is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation > what it is. > > bob's to blame. > > -- > "And off they went, from here to there, > The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair" > -- TraditionalWill never happen. Israel wants every piece of
    land they can get.They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.


    Such a nice people those Jews, aren't they?

    Have such plans for their region that they consider their homeland, imagine what do they have in store for us, Europeans and Christians, whom by the way, they oppose a lot more than Islam or Arabs.

    Moslems and Arabs are only in their way as Jews are trying to take more of the desert there, a lot more than UN allowed them to. Once they purge Arabs it might even subside.

    But their real enemies is us.

    Europeans and unsurprisingly Iran, civilisation also related to the Aryans, as their name suggests.










    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sawfish@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Fri Oct 13 07:21:22 2023
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the
    same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.

    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.

    --
    --Sawfish ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "Wha's yo name, fool?" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From PeteWasLucky@21:1/5 to Sawfish on Fri Oct 13 10:55:14 2023
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:> On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49AM UTC-4, Pelle Svansls wrote:>> On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:>>> once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to
    oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.>> For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the>> same as it ever was. A two-state
    solution. Lavrov is right. But ...>>>> ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation>> what it is.>>>> bob's to blame.>>>> -- >> "And off they went, from here to there,>> The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair">> -- Traditional>
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.> They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.A promised land for God's chosen people.Quite a concept, that.-- --Sawfish~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Wha's yo name, fool?"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Imagine if we live in this kind of environment https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZPR7QkufJ/



    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Fri Oct 13 08:37:03 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 14:27:23 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.

    it'll never be enough for the Palestinians, that's why they voted in Hamas, they don't want a 2 state solution they want the whole of Israel and to wipe the Jews off the map.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jdeluise@21:1/5 to Sawfish on Fri Oct 13 07:36:15 2023
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:

    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: >>> On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has
    he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is
    wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear
    head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is
    the same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But
    ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    -- "And off they went, from here to there, The bear, the bear, and
    the maiden fair" -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and
    they are proceeding with their plans.

    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.

    Interestingly Putin has similar designs on acquiring territory he
    believes is his and is willing to kill on much larger scale. And yet,
    Pete has been largely supportive of Putin. Hell, he is also (allegedly)
    the native son of a country that wiped out the vast majority of native Americans and stole their land. He's happy to live here though. His
    faux outrage is hilarious.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to jdeluise on Fri Oct 13 08:39:51 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 16:36:23 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:

    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: >>> On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has
    he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is
    wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear
    head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is
    the same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But
    ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    -- "And off they went, from here to there, The bear, the bear, and
    the maiden fair" -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and
    they are proceeding with their plans.

    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    Interestingly Putin has similar designs on acquiring territory he
    believes is his and is willing to kill on much larger scale. And yet,
    Pete has been largely supportive of Putin. Hell, he is also (allegedly)
    the native son of a country that wiped out the vast majority of native Americans and stole their land. He's happy to live here though. His
    faux outrage is hilarious.

    Biden has similar designs on acquring any terroritory he can get his hands on to become proxy states of the USA or to sell weapons to and get reparations company $$$, just look at Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya etc. You voted purposely for Biden more of
    these neocon wars, so can't say much.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jdeluise@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Fri Oct 13 07:41:52 2023
    The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> writes:



    Biden has similar designs on acquring any terroritory he can get his
    hands on to become proxy states of the USA or to sell weapons to and
    get reparations company $$$, just look at Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria,
    Libya etc. You voted purposely for Biden more of these neocon wars, so
    can't say much.

    Biden pulled us out of Afghanistan...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to Sawfish on Fri Oct 13 08:41:52 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 15:21:27 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the >> same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.

    if they desperately wanted that, why didn't they just take it after the 6 day war? fact is the Jews became the majority in the area by mass immigration and got the state they wanted, then the Arabs rebelled against it. Surely it no different than if
    enough Islamics turned up in Europe or USA and then claimed their own ISIS state? once the majority how can you argue?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jdeluise@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Fri Oct 13 07:46:19 2023
    The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> writes:

    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 16:41:55 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
    The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:



    Biden has similar designs on acquring any terroritory he can get
    his hands on to become proxy states of the USA or to sell weapons
    to and get reparations company $$$, just look at Afghanistan, Iraq,
    Syria, Libya etc. You voted purposely for Biden more of these
    neocon wars, so can't say much.
    Biden pulled us out of Afghanistan...

    after all his neocon pals had looted the place, they'd made their $$$

    But you just said he has designs on the land. The land is in fact very valuable, containing a vast supply of untapped precious metals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to jdeluise on Fri Oct 13 08:43:15 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 16:41:55 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
    The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:



    Biden has similar designs on acquring any terroritory he can get his
    hands on to become proxy states of the USA or to sell weapons to and
    get reparations company $$$, just look at Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria,
    Libya etc. You voted purposely for Biden more of these neocon wars, so can't say much.
    Biden pulled us out of Afghanistan...

    after all his neocon pals had looted the place, they'd made their $$$

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jdeluise@21:1/5 to jdeluise on Fri Oct 13 07:58:20 2023
    jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> writes:

    The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> writes:

    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 16:41:55 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
    The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:



    Biden has similar designs on acquring any terroritory he can get
    his hands on to become proxy states of the USA or to sell weapons
    to and get reparations company $$$, just look at Afghanistan,
    Iraq, Syria, Libya etc. You voted purposely for Biden more of
    these neocon wars, so can't say much.
    Biden pulled us out of Afghanistan...

    after all his neocon pals had looted the place, they'd made their $$$

    But you just said he has designs on the land. The land is in fact
    very valuable, containing a vast supply of untapped precious metals.

    btw, is Biden a neocon or a marxist? Make up your mind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Pelle_Svansl=C3=B6s?=@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Fri Oct 13 18:58:28 2023
    On 13.10.2023 18.37, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 14:27:23 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: >>> On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the
    same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.

    it'll never be enough for the Palestinians, that's why they voted in Hamas, they don't want a 2 state solution they want the whole of Israel and to wipe the Jews off the map.

    Didn't you just call Mr Putin a peacenik with a clear-headed
    humanitarian two-state solution?

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 13 09:07:10 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 16:58:34 UTC+1, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 18.37, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 14:27:23 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: >>> On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the >>> same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.

    it'll never be enough for the Palestinians, that's why they voted in Hamas, they don't want a 2 state solution they want the whole of Israel and to wipe the Jews off the map.
    Didn't you just call Mr Putin a peacenik with a clear-headed
    humanitarian two-state solution?

    yes that is what is so brilliant about Putin, despite the Palestinians wanting more than just their own state he wants to help find a way for negotiation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to jdeluise on Fri Oct 13 09:10:05 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 16:58:27 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
    jdeluise <jdel...@gmail.com> writes:

    The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:

    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 16:41:55 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
    The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:



    Biden has similar designs on acquring any terroritory he can get
    his hands on to become proxy states of the USA or to sell weapons
    to and get reparations company $$$, just look at Afghanistan,
    Iraq, Syria, Libya etc. You voted purposely for Biden more of
    these neocon wars, so can't say much.
    Biden pulled us out of Afghanistan...

    after all his neocon pals had looted the place, they'd made their $$$

    But you just said he has designs on the land. The land is in fact
    very valuable, containing a vast supply of untapped precious metals.
    btw, is Biden a neocon or a marxist? Make up your mind.

    he's both, why do you think Trump's Marxist enemies now absolutely love Dick Cheney and his daughter? as for Afghan land, it's the power the land brings that he wants and as said he looted as much as possible and can't be bothered any more. He an
    opportunist, like when the oil price was mega-high after he provoked the war in the Ukraine, he wanted to take over Russia and grab all their cheap oil, but then the oil price fell back to normal, so he wasn't so bothered about taking over Russia any
    more.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From PeteWasLucky@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Fri Oct 13 10:27:51 2023
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 11:41:54 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 15:21:27 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the >> same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    if they desperately wanted that, why didn't they just take it after the 6 day war? fact is the Jews became the majority in the area by mass immigration and got the state they wanted, then the Arabs rebelled against it. Surely it no different than if
    enough Islamics turned up in Europe or USA and then claimed their own ISIS state? once the majority how can you argue?

    They took it, but give it back after war 73 and signing peace treaty with Sadat, which they regretted later.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Fri Oct 13 19:46:22 2023
    The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 14:27:23 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:> On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: > > On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote: > > > once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only
    has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified. > > For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the > > same as
    it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... > > > > ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation > > what it is. > > > > bob's to blame. > > > > -- > > "And off they went, from here to there, > > The bear, the bear,
    and the maiden fair" > > -- Traditional> Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get. > They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.it'll never be enough for the
    Palestinians, that's why they voted in Hamas, they don't want a 2 state solution they want the whole of Israel and to wipe the Jews off the map.



    They both want each others land ie entire region.

    They both have some claims historical, demographical etc, and they're both relentless.


    The difference is that Palestinians have not occupied Israel, but Israel has occupied Palestine.

    They both want to slaughter each other, but Jews are on Palestinean recognized land, creating new settlements every day.

    It's a theft and sadism.





    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From PeteWasLucky@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Fri Oct 13 10:38:53 2023
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 11:41:54 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 15:21:27 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the >> same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    if they desperately wanted that, why didn't they just take it after the 6 day war? fact is the Jews became the majority in the area by mass immigration and got the state they wanted, then the Arabs rebelled against it. Surely it no different than if
    enough Islamics turned up in Europe or USA and then claimed their own ISIS state? once the majority how can you argue?

    You mean Jew population grew and kicked out Palestinians and kept taking their territory and got them to live as refugees?

    You see, they are the only country that is based on race/religion.
    What does translate to?

    Anyway, it's such weak concept, won't last long and roles will be reversed someday.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From PeteWasLucky@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 13 10:55:14 2023
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 1:46:24 PM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:
    The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 14:27:23 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:> On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: > > On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote: > > > once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not
    only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified. > > For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the > > same
    as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... > > > > ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation > > what it is. > > > > bob's to blame. > > > > -- > > "And off they went, from here to there, > > The bear, the
    bear, and the maiden fair" > > -- Traditional> Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get. > They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.it'll never be enough for the
    Palestinians, that's why they voted in Hamas, they don't want a 2 state solution they want the whole of Israel and to wipe the Jews off the map.



    They both want each others land ie entire region.

    They both have some claims historical, demographical etc, and they're both relentless.


    The difference is that Palestinians have not occupied Israel, but Israel has occupied Palestine.

    They both want to slaughter each other, but Jews are on Palestinean recognized land, creating new settlements every day.

    It's a theft and sadism.
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    When you are negotiating while living in a tent and they are telling you they will give you a bigger tent as the state you are asking for, it's normal to reject such kind of negotiations.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Fri Oct 13 11:48:09 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:55:16 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 1:46:24 PM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:
    The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 14:27:23 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:> On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: > > On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote: > > > once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not
    only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified. > > For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the > > same
    as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... > > > > ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation > > what it is. > > > > bob's to blame. > > > > -- > > "And off they went, from here to there, > > The bear, the
    bear, and the maiden fair" > > -- Traditional> Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get. > They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.it'll never be enough for the
    Palestinians, that's why they voted in Hamas, they don't want a 2 state solution they want the whole of Israel and to wipe the Jews off the map.



    They both want each others land ie entire region.

    They both have some claims historical, demographical etc, and they're both relentless.


    The difference is that Palestinians have not occupied Israel, but Israel has occupied Palestine.

    They both want to slaughter each other, but Jews are on Palestinean recognized land, creating new settlements every day.

    It's a theft and sadism.
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
    When you are negotiating while living in a tent and they are telling you they will give you a bigger tent as the state you are asking for, it's normal to reject such kind of negotiations.

    Israel offered them their own land + they have better rights and facilities than anywhere else in the Arab world and the nuts still rejected it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Fri Oct 13 11:49:27 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:27:54 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 11:41:54 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 15:21:27 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the
    same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... >>
    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation >> what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    if they desperately wanted that, why didn't they just take it after the 6 day war? fact is the Jews became the majority in the area by mass immigration and got the state they wanted, then the Arabs rebelled against it. Surely it no different than if
    enough Islamics turned up in Europe or USA and then claimed their own ISIS state? once the majority how can you argue?
    They took it, but give it back after war 73 and signing peace treaty with Sadat, which they regretted later.

    that makes no sense, why give back in 73 if they wanted it all along? if they always wanted it they'd just hang onto it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sawfish@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Fri Oct 13 12:08:17 2023
    On 10/13/23 11:49 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:27:54 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 11:41:54 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 15:21:27 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: >>>>>> On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the >>>>>> same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... >>>>>>
    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation >>>>>> what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get. l
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    if they desperately wanted that, why didn't they just take it after the 6 day war? fact is the Jews became the majority in the area by mass immigration and got the state they wanted, then the Arabs rebelled against it. Surely it no different than if
    enough Islamics turned up in Europe or USA and then claimed their own ISIS state? once the majority how can you argue?
    They took it, but give it back after war 73 and signing peace treaty with Sadat, which they regretted later.
    that makes no sense, why give back in 73 if they wanted it all along? if they always wanted it they'd just hang onto it.

    These are the same guys, the Israelis, who have been building
    settlements in the west bank that violate the agreement, is this correct?

    Ice, I'm not saying you're wrong--I really don't know. But I could
    easily envision giving back the gaza strip as a part of a negotiated
    settlement after 73. I'd suspect that if they want it now, it's to deny
    a base of operations to Hamas.

    --
    --Sawfish

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well, I have others." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From joh@21:1/5 to Sawfish on Sat Oct 14 00:55:18 2023
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 4:21:27 PM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the >> same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.

    The founding myth of the USA too.


    --
    --Sawfish ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Wha's yo name, fool?" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sawfish@21:1/5 to joh on Sat Oct 14 01:48:00 2023
    On 10/14/23 12:55 AM, joh wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 4:21:27 PM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: >>>> On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the >>>> same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ...

    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation
    what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    The founding myth of the USA too.

    --
    --Sawfish
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> "Wha's yo name, fool?"
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    I think you're confusing the US in general with the Mormons in particular.

    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don’t have to waste your time voting."

    --Charles Bukowski ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to joh on Sat Oct 14 10:17:19 2023
    joh <joshorst@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
    The founding myth of the USA too.



    Enough with historical relativisation.
    Whatever happened there, ended long time ago.


    As progressives would say, you can not do this in 2023.


    Israel (all Jews of the world, since all Jews of the world are eligible for Israeli citizenship and many of them are settlers) is now genociding natives in Gaza in response to SOME natives there committing terrorism in response to Jewish theft of
    Palestinean land and occupation that's ongoing for more than 70 years.

    Israel exist. But Palestine does not exist because it's under occupation.

    So the chicken or the egg is very clear here.


    Palestineans are occupied 70 years. And Jews build new cities there all the time stealing Palestinean land.


    Germany was under occupation 1945-1949.

    They had Hitler and were very bad so they got occupied 4 years.

    Are Palestineans that much worse that they should get 70+ years?




    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Israel_and_occupied_territories_map.png






    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From joh@21:1/5 to Sawfish on Sat Oct 14 01:50:54 2023
    On Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 10:48:04 AM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/14/23 12:55 AM, joh wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 4:21:27 PM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the >>>> same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... >>>>
    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation >>>> what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    The founding myth of the USA too.

    --
    --Sawfish
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "Wha's yo name, fool?"
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I think you're confusing the US in general with the Mormons in particular.

    No, I don't think so.


    -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don’t have to waste your time voting."

    --Charles Bukowski ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Pelle_Svansl=C3=B6s?=@21:1/5 to joh on Sat Oct 14 13:47:23 2023
    On 14.10.2023 11.50, joh wrote:
    On Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 10:48:04 AM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/14/23 12:55 AM, joh wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 4:21:27 PM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote: >>>>>> On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the >>>>>> same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... >>>>>>
    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation >>>>>> what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    The founding myth of the USA too.

    --
    --Sawfish
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "Wha's yo name, fool?"
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I think you're confusing the US in general with the Mormons in particular.

    No, I don't think so.

    sawfish hasn't thought this through.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 14 04:27:15 2023
    On Saturday, 14 October 2023 at 11:47:28 UTC+1, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 14.10.2023 11.50, joh wrote:
    On Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 10:48:04 AM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/14/23 12:55 AM, joh wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 4:21:27 PM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the
    same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... >>>>>>
    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation >>>>>> what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get. >>>>> They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    The founding myth of the USA too.

    --
    --Sawfish
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "Wha's yo name, fool?"
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I think you're confusing the US in general with the Mormons in particular.

    No, I don't think so.
    sawfish hasn't thought this through.

    oh please enlighten us then, you history-hating Marxist maroon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 14 04:41:36 2023
    On Saturday, 14 October 2023 at 09:17:22 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
    joh <josh...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
    The founding myth of the USA too.
    Enough with historical relativisation.
    Whatever happened there, ended long time ago.


    As progressives would say, you can not do this in 2023.


    Israel (all Jews of the world, since all Jews of the world are eligible for Israeli citizenship and many of them are settlers) is now genociding natives in Gaza in response to SOME natives there committing terrorism in response to Jewish theft of
    Palestinean land and occupation that's ongoing for more than 70 years.

    Israel exist. But Palestine does not exist because it's under occupation.

    So the chicken or the egg is very clear here.


    Palestineans are occupied 70 years. And Jews build new cities there all the time stealing Palestinean land.


    Germany was under occupation 1945-1949.

    They had Hitler and were very bad so they got occupied 4 years.

    Are Palestineans that much worse that they should get 70+ years?




    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Israel_and_occupied_territories_map.png

    Israel isn't going anywhere, they nukes, a highly trained military and the surrounding Arabs for all their talk definitely don't want the Palestinians in their countries either. Surely the Palestinians have zero chance?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to joh on Sat Oct 14 04:26:34 2023
    On Saturday, 14 October 2023 at 09:50:56 UTC+1, joh wrote:
    On Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 10:48:04 AM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/14/23 12:55 AM, joh wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 4:21:27 PM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the
    same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... >>>>
    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation >>>> what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get.
    They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    The founding myth of the USA too.

    --
    --Sawfish
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "Wha's yo name, fool?"
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I think you're confusing the US in general with the Mormons in particular.
    No, I don't think so.

    what "founding myth" are you talking about then, you revisionist buffoon?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to Sawfish on Sat Oct 14 05:08:23 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 20:08:22 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 11:49 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:27:54 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 11:41:54 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote: >>> On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 15:21:27 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the
    same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... >>>>>>
    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation >>>>>> what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get. l >>>>> They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    if they desperately wanted that, why didn't they just take it after the 6 day war? fact is the Jews became the majority in the area by mass immigration and got the state they wanted, then the Arabs rebelled against it. Surely it no different than
    if enough Islamics turned up in Europe or USA and then claimed their own ISIS state? once the majority how can you argue?
    They took it, but give it back after war 73 and signing peace treaty with Sadat, which they regretted later.
    that makes no sense, why give back in 73 if they wanted it all along? if they always wanted it they'd just hang onto it.
    These are the same guys, the Israelis, who have been building
    settlements in the west bank that violate the agreement, is this correct?

    Ice, I'm not saying you're wrong--I really don't know. But I could
    easily envision giving back the gaza strip as a part of a negotiated settlement after 73. I'd suspect that if they want it now, it's to deny
    a base of operations to Hamas.

    previous Israeli governments were happy to give up Gaza and the West Bank to the Palestinians with the idea of "here you go, please leave us alone", but the Palestinian idiots just kept sending rockets to Israeli nurseries etc. yes rather than spend the
    money on facilities they prefer rockets. Anyway then more hardline governments (Netenyahu etc) have just had enough of this behaviour, so they've just said we don't care we're building in the West Bank and going to have lots of settlers there, personally
    think there no need for that at all and it provokative.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Pelle_Svansl=C3=B6s?=@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Sat Oct 14 17:54:39 2023
    On 14.10.2023 14.27, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Saturday, 14 October 2023 at 11:47:28 UTC+1, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 14.10.2023 11.50, joh wrote:
    On Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 10:48:04 AM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/14/23 12:55 AM, joh wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 4:21:27 PM UTC+2, Sawfish wrote:
    On 10/13/23 6:27 AM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:15:49 AM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 13.10.2023 13.40, The Iceberg wrote:
    once again Mr.Putin is proving to be a humanitarian. Not only has he given sanctuary to oppressed white Africans but now he is wanting to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem, keeping a clear head whilst everyone is terrified.
    For once, I actually agree with you. The solution for the crisis is the
    same as it ever was. A two-state solution. Lavrov is right. But ... >>>>>>>>
    ... it is, would you believe, Twump, that largely made the situation >>>>>>>> what it is.

    bob's to blame.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    Will never happen. Israel wants every piece of land they can get. >>>>>>> They want their promised land to extend between the two rivers and they are proceeding with their plans.
    A promised land for God's chosen people.

    Quite a concept, that.
    The founding myth of the USA too.

    --
    --Sawfish
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "Wha's yo name, fool?"
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I think you're confusing the US in general with the Mormons in particular. >>>
    No, I don't think so.
    sawfish hasn't thought this through.

    oh please enlighten us then, you history-hating Marxist maroon.

    https://www.britannica.com/topic/American-exceptionalism

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TT@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 15 23:27:02 2023
    The Iceberg kirjoitti 13.10.2023 klo 18.37:
    it'll never be enough for the Palestinians, that's why they voted in
    Hamas, they don't want a 2 state solution they want the whole of Israel
    and to wipe the Jews off the map.

    This is true. Hamas' officially stated goal is to end Israel through jihad.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to TT@dprk.kp on Sun Oct 15 23:50:07 2023
    TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r
    The Iceberg kirjoitti 13.10.2023 klo 18.37:> it'll never be enough for the Palestinians, that's why they voted in > Hamas, they don't want a 2 state solution they want the whole of Israel > and to wipe the Jews off the map.This is true. Hamas'
    officially stated goal is to end Israel through jihad.


    So it means they're like Israel?

    Israel's stated goal is to prevent Palestine from existing.


    The only difference is that Israel is successful.

    And btw Hamas does not represent Palestineans so it's actually irrelevant what they say.


    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 16 06:33:29 2023
    On Sunday, 15 October 2023 at 22:50:10 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
    TT <T...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r
    The Iceberg kirjoitti 13.10.2023 klo 18.37:> it'll never be enough for the Palestinians, that's why they voted in > Hamas, they don't want a 2 state solution they want the whole of Israel > and to wipe the Jews off the map.This is true. Hamas'
    officially stated goal is to end Israel through jihad.


    So it means they're like Israel?

    Israel's stated goal is to prevent Palestine from existing.


    The only difference is that Israel is successful.

    And btw Hamas does not represent Palestineans so it's actually irrelevant what they say.

    Palestinians voted Hamas in, they chose them to represent them?

    it seems the whole world recognises Palestine except the USA, Canada and Western Europe.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_the_State_of_Palestine

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Mon Oct 16 21:10:07 2023
    The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Sunday, 15 October 2023 at 22:50:10 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:> TT <T...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r > > The Iceberg kirjoitti 13.10.2023 klo 18.37:> it'll never be enough for the Palestinians, that's why they voted in > Hamas, they don't want a 2
    state solution they want the whole of Israel > and to wipe the Jews off the map.This is true. Hamas' officially stated goal is to end Israel through jihad. > > > So it means they're like Israel? > > Israel's stated goal is to prevent Palestine from
    existing. > > > The only difference is that Israel is successful. > > And btw Hamas does not represent Palestineans so it's actually irrelevant what they say.Palestinians voted Hamas in, they chose them to represent them?it seems the whole world
    recognises Palestine except the USA, Canada and Western Europe.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_the_State_of_Palestine




    Hamas was installed by Israel in Gaza to sow division among the Palestinians and split Gaza and West Bank.

    Hamas is not a representative of Palestineans.

    Not even in Gaza where they rule.

    After 70 years and occupation, being bombed and killed, people are terrorised, brainwashed and radicalised. Their vote would not matter even if the cast one freely.

    And there's nothing fair in Hamas "winning 2006 election" or whenever and holding power to this day in Gaza and disobeying Palestinean legit resistance, PLO.


    I understand why radical Hamas did what they did the other day, they slaughtered many Jews and in return many Palestineans will die in retribution that Jews will do according to their rule, "we kill 5 Palestineans for 1 Jew".

    Hamas excluded themselves forever after their terrorist act but they also showed to the world what are Jews like, and perhaps their startegy will end up being succesful, drawing attention to 70-year occupation of Palestineans.

    Sometimes nice guys simply can not achieve things.



    Is it time that Israel ends occupation?






    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied-occupied_Germany

    The entirety of Germany was occupied and administered by the Allies of World War II from the Berlin Declaration on 5 June 1945 to the establishment of West Germany on 23 May 1949.

    4 years.




    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Japan

    Japan was occupied and administered by the victorious Allies of World War II from the surrender of the Empire of Japan on September 2, 1945 at the end of the Second World War until the Treaty of San Francisco took effect on April 28, 1952.

    7 years




    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_territories

    The Palestinian territories are the two regions of the former British Mandate for Palestine that have been militarily occupied by Israel since the Six-Day War of 1967, namely: the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip. The International
    Court of Justice (ICJ) has referred to the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, as "the Occupied Palestinian Territory", and this term was used as the legal definition by the ICJ in its advisory opinion of July 2004.

    56 years officially by Israel.




    19 years before that by others.

    The Gaza Strip and the West Bank had been occupied by Egypt and Jordan, respectively, since the 1948 Arab–Israeli War until the Six-Day War of 1967.

    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 17 04:52:16 2023
    On Monday, 16 October 2023 at 20:10:11 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
    The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Sunday, 15 October 2023 at 22:50:10 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:> TT <T...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r > > The Iceberg kirjoitti 13.10.2023 klo 18.37:> it'll never be enough for the Palestinians, that's why they voted in > Hamas, they don't want a 2
    state solution they want the whole of Israel > and to wipe the Jews off the map.This is true. Hamas' officially stated goal is to end Israel through jihad. > > > So it means they're like Israel? > > Israel's stated goal is to prevent Palestine from
    existing. > > > The only difference is that Israel is successful. > > And btw Hamas does not represent Palestineans so it's actually irrelevant what they say.Palestinians voted Hamas in, they chose them to represent them?it seems the whole world
    recognises Palestine except the USA, Canada and Western Europe.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_the_State_of_Palestine




    Hamas was installed by Israel in Gaza to sow division among the Palestinians and split Gaza and West Bank.

    Hamas is not a representative of Palestineans.

    Not even in Gaza where they rule.

    After 70 years and occupation, being bombed and killed, people are terrorised, brainwashed and radicalised. Their vote would not matter even if the cast one freely.

    And there's nothing fair in Hamas "winning 2006 election" or whenever and holding power to this day in Gaza and disobeying Palestinean legit resistance, PLO.

    I understand why radical Hamas did what they did the other day, they slaughtered many Jews and in return many Palestineans will die in retribution that Jews will do according to their rule, "we kill 5 Palestineans for 1 Jew".

    Hamas excluded themselves forever after their terrorist act but they also showed to the world what are Jews like, and perhaps their startegy will end up being succesful, drawing attention to 70-year occupation of Palestineans.

    yes it's showed the Jews will retaliate and attack back rather than just sit there, it also shown the world won't go against them doing that. It much like Bush invading Iraq and Afghanistan in 2003.

    Sometimes nice guys simply can not achieve things.

    well seems a very stupid mentality, like the 911 hijackers who've done jack to achieve their goals, other than kill themselves and loads of other random folks. Compare that to the 1997 Northern Ireland agreement - yes we had to release a bunch of evil
    child murdering Irish terrorists for free who then went into drug dealing, but that meant 90% of people could start living normal lives and their standard of living improved hugely.

    If the idiots had voted for Fatah they'd already have a Palestinian state and it'd be bigger than what they'll get now.

    Is it time that Israel ends occupation?

    Now they might get a state as even Biden is saying they should have one, but it'll be with even smaller territory, prob just the West Bank excluding the Gaza strip as Israel can't defend the border there otherwise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerrit 't Hart@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Tue Oct 17 21:28:31 2023
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:40:04 UTC+8, The Iceberg wrote:
    On Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 18:59:15 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
    https://dailystormer.in/lavrov-calls-for-immediately-implementing-un-decisions-on-israel-creating-palestinian-state/

    SNIP

    Isn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.
    IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.
    The Arab nations (and presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and invaded the rtewly proclaimed Israel.
    And lost out big.
    And they are still at it.
    Gerrit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to Gerrit 't Hart on Wed Oct 18 07:15:08 2023
    "Gerrit 't Hart" <gthart@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:40:04 UTC+8, The Iceberg wrote:> On Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 18:59:15 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: > > https://dailystormer.in/lavrov-calls-for-immediately-implementing-un-decisions-on-israel-creating-palestinian-state/ >
    SNIPIsn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.The Arab nations (and presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and invaded the rtewly proclaimed Israel.And
    lost out big.And they are still at it.Gerrit


    Fake news.

    Why do you enjoy lying so much?


    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to Gerrit 't Hart on Wed Oct 18 10:56:04 2023
    "Gerrit 't Hart" <gthart@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 13:15:08 UTC+8, *skriptis wrote:> "Gerrit 't Hart" > Wrote in message:r > > On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:40:04 UTC+8, The Iceberg wrote:> On Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 18:59:15 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: > > https://
    dailystormer.in/lavrov-calls-for-immediately-implementing-un-decisions-on-israel-creating-palestinian-state/ > > SNIPIsn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.The Arab nations (and
    presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and invaded the rtewly proclaimed Israel.And lost out big.And they are still at it.Gerrit > > > Fake news. > > Why do you enjoy lying so much?> -- > > > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---
    - > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlHello SkriptisPlease tell me what is fake and/or lying about my comment.Gerrit


    Hello Geritt, I will post it later today.
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerrit 't Hart@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 18 01:21:28 2023
    On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 13:15:08 UTC+8, *skriptis wrote:
    "Gerrit 't Hart" > Wrote in message:r
    On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:40:04 UTC+8, The Iceberg wrote:> On Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 18:59:15 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: > > https://dailystormer.in/lavrov-calls-for-immediately-implementing-un-decisions-on-israel-creating-palestinian-state/
    SNIPIsn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.The Arab nations (and presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and invaded the rtewly proclaimed Israel.
    And lost out big.And they are still at it.Gerrit


    Fake news.

    Why do you enjoy lying so much?
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
    Hello Skriptis
    Please tell me what is fake and/or lying about my comment.
    Gerrit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TT@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 18 12:07:06 2023
    *skriptis kirjoitti 18.10.2023 klo 11.56:
    "Gerrit 't Hart" <gthart@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 13:15:08 UTC+8, *skriptis wrote:> "Gerrit 't Hart" > Wrote in message:r > > On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:40:04 UTC+8, The Iceberg wrote:> On Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 18:59:15 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: > > https://
    dailystormer.in/lavrov-calls-for-immediately-implementing-un-decisions-on-israel-creating-palestinian-state/ > > SNIPIsn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.The Arab nations (and
    presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and invaded the rtewly proclaimed Israel.And lost out big.And they are still at it.Gerrit > > > Fake news. > > Why do you enjoy lying so much?> -- > > > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---
    - > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlHello SkriptisPlease tell me what is fake and/or lying about my comment.Gerrit


    Hello Geritt, I will post it later today.

    Put up links from Wikipedia for your claims. Since we don't trust your
    claims & sources.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 18 03:52:44 2023
    On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 10:07:11 UTC+1, TT wrote:
    *skriptis kirjoitti 18.10.2023 klo 11.56:
    "Gerrit 't Hart" <gth...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 13:15:08 UTC+8, *skriptis wrote:> "Gerrit 't Hart" > Wrote in message:r > > On Friday, 13 October 2023 at 18:40:04 UTC+8, The Iceberg wrote:> On Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 18:59:15 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: > > https:
    //dailystormer.in/lavrov-calls-for-immediately-implementing-un-decisions-on-israel-creating-palestinian-state/ > > SNIPIsn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.The Arab nations (and
    presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and invaded the rtewly proclaimed Israel.And lost out big.And they are still at it.Gerrit > > > Fake news. > > Why do you enjoy lying so much?> -- > > > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---
    - > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlHello SkriptisPlease tell me what is fake and/or lying about my comment.Gerrit


    Hello Geritt, I will post it later today.
    Put up links from Wikipedia for your claims. Since we don't trust your claims & sources.

    yes have to say will be interested. Far as know the Arabs have been stupid, like voting in Hamas, they've attacked when not needed and lost bigtime. Israel has sometimes attacked first with pre-emptive strike but it understandable like bombing and
    Stuxnetting the Iranian nuclear weapons labs, they not going to sit around and wait to be nuked. What is really bad about Israel is their behaviour in the West Bank and Gaza, they should've banned the Israeli settlers, there no need for them to be there,
    but Netanyahu doesn't care he just sees the Arabs all as future terrorists who want to destroy Israel(which most of them do) and has no time for them and it his way of shoving Israel in their faces. What is annoying is Israel never gets told off by the
    USA or US media(the BBC is always usually pro-Palestine), yet the USA said the UK was bad regarding the evil child murdering IRA terrorists in Ireland, imagine if we'd cut off water supply to Ireland in the 80's?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to Gerrit 't Hart on Wed Oct 18 13:16:42 2023
    "Gerrit 't Hart" <gthart@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
    Hello SkriptisPlease tell me what is fake and/or lying about my comment.Gerrit



    There's a logical fallacy in your post and in overall understanding of the situation.

    I'll give you a counter example.

    Even if we place entire blame on Germany for starting or causing ww1, it's absurd and impossible to punish them or try to punish them for anything related to ww1 in this year, 2023.

    Not only because ww1 happened long time ago 1914-1918, but because ww1 was done, was settled, rightly or wrongly, and then even that post ww1 structure collapsed, we had ww2 in 1939-1945, and a new reality after that altogether.

    So the post ww1 structure, or ww1 as a cause of anything today is a moot point.

    Yes it's important to know all of it, and it's not a prehistoric era, there's a lot of cause and effect, but it's not relevant in legal sense. It's indeed history.


    I think we can also agree that 1948 is a year 0 or day 0 in Israeli-Arab relations because that's moment when state of Israel was created. That's when the history sort of begins in terms of state relations.

    But new reality, new UN resolution and all that, was created in 1967, following their last war. So the 1948 events are irrelevant.

    Prehistory is before 1948, before Jewish state was created, then history is 1948-1967 and 1967-present day is politics.

    1967 UN resolutions still aren't implemented and alternatively new ones have not been passed.

    So that's the problem you can discuss if you want.

    If you want to solve problems, you deal with politics, you can't touch history or even prehistory.




    So to put this kinda in comparison.

    Anything before 1948 is "prehistory" in terms of relations between the two sides. State of Israel did not exist and we can only discuss whose people are more right or wrong, who has the moral high ground etc. Jewish propaganda made sure people in the
    west think it's the Jews who have the moral high ground. In my view, it's absolutely opposite from that.

    Bunch of Jews meeting in Basel, Switzerland in 1881 at a first Zionist congress and deciding they'll conquer Palestine is as agressive move as Hitler forming his nazi party and pursuing policy of destroying Russia to seize the lands for Germans in
    eastern Europe.

    It's a form of conquest.

    You don't get to have moral high ground when you do that.

    We can accept it once it's done, and you have to live with that, e.g. like white Europeans conquering North America, new nations have been formed, facts on the ground are established, that's the reality, but please, spare me of propaganda.

    Does anyone in USA e.g. claim it's awesome that whites conquered North America and prevented redskins from establishing their nations? It's good for whites, I guess, but there's no much gloating anymore?

    Jews otoh claim it's awesome that they've conquered middle east. For an impartial observer it's absurd, but western people buy it. Partly because of distorted and heretical protestant Christianity nowadays who are into Jew worshiping, and of course
    holocaust guilt that some Europeans enjoy to experience.

    The real truth, if you want to debate pre-1948, as a fun, then Jews don't have the moral high ground in relation to Palestinians. They have low ground.


    Following collapse of medieval Arab empires, right through modernity, the middle east was held by Ottoman Turks for centuries. And then by British following WW1.


    British mandate was established in 1918 and Jews started moving to Palestine.

    The first british high commissioner was a Jew.


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Samuel,_1st_Viscount_Samuel

    He was the first nominally-practising Jew to serve as a Cabinet minister and to become the leader of a major British political party. Samuel had promoted Zionism within the British Cabinet, beginning with his 1915 memorandum entitled The Future of
    Palestine. In 1920 he was appointed as the first High Commissioner for Palestine, in charge of the administration of the territory.




    So do you think the whole British rule in Palestine was fair towards the Arabs?

    I would say probably no.


    You see, we must understand their rage. They were a conquered people under British rule post ww1, they were promised freedom if they rebelled against Turks and help Britain in WW1, but after WW1 they were still not free, still a colony, now under British
    rule, which was subverted by Jews, who were working towards Jewish interests, allowing mass immigration of Jews into Palestine.

    Arabs, had they had their own sovereignty, would certainly not have allowed that. And even if they let some Jews in, they would not have allowed a separate, exclusive Jewish state.

    If Arabs got what they wanted post ww1, they'd probably recreated some of their medieval empire, not created bunch of states.

    So Arabs were in a unique situation.

    Members of their enemy tribe (Jews) have subverted global superpower (British) who were the masters there and then British opened the gates for Jews to move there, ignoring Arab objections.


    Hers a fun short clip of 30 seconds from Arab movie relating to those times.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=W3HbJFp4t9EeCMVa&v=HN3qR2H4jGY&feature=youtu.be


    Imagine if the British allowed the mass migrations of Chinese into India during their rule in India, and a British official in charge of that was a chink?

    Yes, it's irritating for the people affected.


    Funnily, it's same today. Again a Jew that's high within ranks of global power is the one who decides in the interests of his tribesmen.

    When US secretary of state Blinken visited Israel days ago he said...

    https://globalbihari.com/i-come-before-you-not-only-as-the-united-states-secretary-of-state-but-also-as-a-jew/




    So all of this leaves a bitter taste in their mouth. Arabs feel their land was stolen from them. It was not them who expelled Jews from Palestine (Judea) in the first place, Roman empire did in year 70.

    And then Jews "return". How can you allegedly return 1900 years later and demand even a piece of it, let alone whole land?


    So the Arabs who want to see no Israel, want to see it destroyed are not as radical as they're presented in Jewish media in the west.

    Destroying a state entity is different from destroying people.

    USA completely destroyed Confederate States of America. But they didn't kill people.

    Most of Arabs and Moslems who even want to "destroy Israel" want to destroy it in that fashion. Genocide of the Jews is more of a Jewish propaganda for gullible westerners.



    So how did the British mandate end after WW2? Jews were now even more powerful and the Jews who run those affairs in Britain made sure Israel gets more than 50% of Palestine even though they were only third of the people by 1948.

    Get it? Arabs were furious that there are even Jews there at all, let alone that they got more then 50% of Palestine when they're about a third of population.

    Israel declared independence in 1948 within boundaries that they received, and Arabs being angry attacked them.

    But the thing is, Israel was attacked by another countries, by Egypt, by Jordan etc.


    Israel won the war and even expanded their terrority at the expense of the rest of the former British mandate.


    So "Arabs in Palestine" lose land, because another countries attacked Israel.

    Sounds dumb, but ok.


    Then UN and the world acknowledged those changes, and let Israel have even more of British Palestine which made Arabs even more angry.


    But the thing is, the areas of former British mandate that Israel didn't conquer in 1948, were occupied by Egypt, Jordan etc.

    Those are the present day West Bank, Gaza etc.

    Jordan, Egypt didn't annex those territories and made it part of their countries, didn't issue passports to people etc.

    Those Arabs in the reaming parts of British Palestine were now under occupation by another Arab nations.

    Then in 1967 new Israel Arab war broke out, Israel seized those areas from Egypt and Jordan and now all territories of British Palestine was either Israel, or Israeli occupied.

    Israel too didn't annex west bank and Gaza because they don't want to issue passports to people there, they don't want multicultural state, they want Jewish state, but they also want that land.


    Being occupied is not some vague term. It means you're under military rule with no civil rights.


    And they've kept those areas under occupation since 1967, when UN passed last resolution, affirming Israel's right for an even greater Israel, acknowledging all of their gains in wars 1948-1967 but stipulating that the last remnants of British mandate of
    Palestine must be given their freedom ie statehood.

    Israel is ignoring that, has been building settlements and cities, colonizing West Bank, and all of those areas are outside of Israel. Also Gaza was under blockade for the last 2 decades or so.



    To sum it up, Germany and Japan were under occupation following ww2 and it lasted a couple of years.

    The remnants of British mandate of Palestine that are supposed to be Arab state next to a Jewish state is under occupation since the mandate ended.

    Israel was created in 1948.

    At the same time (the rest of) Palestine was occupied by Egypt, Jordan. And in 1967 it was occupied by Israel.


    So you give Hitler to the world, you end up being under occupation 1945-1949. 4 years.

    You live for thousands of years on your land, or at least hundreds, and you get 75 years of occupation, last 56 under Jews who build new cities on your land all the time, stealing more and more.


    Imagine if Germany was still occupied and a French and a British and American and Russian settlers moving in and French majority cities were being built and popping out in Bavarian Alps in 2023, Russian Noviy Berlin was being built next to Berlin and so
    on.

    Occupation of Germany ended in 1949, after 4 years.

    Occupation of Palestine should also end after 75 years, of which last 56 is done by the Israel.

    It says the last valid UN decision.



    Israel has options.

    1. Ethnic cleansing. Expell all Arabs from the remaining British Palestine and annex land with no people.

    2. Decent conquest. Annex all Palestine and issue passports, create multicultural Israel like the Jews promote in western countries.

    3. Abandon occupied territories and return inside Israeli borders.




    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerrit 't Hart@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 18 05:43:45 2023
    On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 19:16:41 UTC+8, *skriptis wrote:
    "Gerrit 't Hart" <gth...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
    Hello SkriptisPlease tell me what is fake and/or lying about my comment.Gerrit



    There's a logical fallacy in your post and in overall understanding of the situation.

    I'll give you a counter example.

    Even if we place entire blame on Germany for starting or causing ww1, it's absurd and impossible to punish them or try to punish them for anything related to ww1 in this year, 2023.

    Not only because ww1 happened long time ago 1914-1918, but because ww1 was done, was settled, rightly or wrongly, and then even that post ww1 structure collapsed, we had ww2 in 1939-1945, and a new reality after that altogether.

    So the post ww1 structure, or ww1 as a cause of anything today is a moot point.

    Yes it's important to know all of it, and it's not a prehistoric era, there's a lot of cause and effect, but it's not relevant in legal sense. It's indeed history.


    I think we can also agree that 1948 is a year 0 or day 0 in Israeli-Arab relations because that's moment when state of Israel was created. That's when the history sort of begins in terms of state relations.

    But new reality, new UN resolution and all that, was created in 1967, following their last war. So the 1948 events are irrelevant.

    Prehistory is before 1948, before Jewish state was created, then history is 1948-1967 and 1967-present day is politics.

    1967 UN resolutions still aren't implemented and alternatively new ones have not been passed.

    So that's the problem you can discuss if you want.

    If you want to solve problems, you deal with politics, you can't touch history or even prehistory.




    So to put this kinda in comparison.

    Anything before 1948 is "prehistory" in terms of relations between the two sides. State of Israel did not exist and we can only discuss whose people are more right or wrong, who has the moral high ground etc. Jewish propaganda made sure people in the
    west think it's the Jews who have the moral high ground. In my view, it's absolutely opposite from that.

    Bunch of Jews meeting in Basel, Switzerland in 1881 at a first Zionist congress and deciding they'll conquer Palestine is as agressive move as Hitler forming his nazi party and pursuing policy of destroying Russia to seize the lands for Germans in
    eastern Europe.

    It's a form of conquest.

    You don't get to have moral high ground when you do that.

    We can accept it once it's done, and you have to live with that, e.g. like white Europeans conquering North America, new nations have been formed, facts on the ground are established, that's the reality, but please, spare me of propaganda.

    Does anyone in USA e.g. claim it's awesome that whites conquered North America and prevented redskins from establishing their nations? It's good for whites, I guess, but there's no much gloating anymore?

    Jews otoh claim it's awesome that they've conquered middle east. For an impartial observer it's absurd, but western people buy it. Partly because of distorted and heretical protestant Christianity nowadays who are into Jew worshiping, and of course
    holocaust guilt that some Europeans enjoy to experience.

    The real truth, if you want to debate pre-1948, as a fun, then Jews don't have the moral high ground in relation to Palestinians. They have low ground.


    Following collapse of medieval Arab empires, right through modernity, the middle east was held by Ottoman Turks for centuries. And then by British following WW1.


    British mandate was established in 1918 and Jews started moving to Palestine.

    The first british high commissioner was a Jew.


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Samuel,_1st_Viscount_Samuel

    He was the first nominally-practising Jew to serve as a Cabinet minister and to become the leader of a major British political party. Samuel had promoted Zionism within the British Cabinet, beginning with his 1915 memorandum entitled The Future of
    Palestine. In 1920 he was appointed as the first High Commissioner for Palestine, in charge of the administration of the territory.




    So do you think the whole British rule in Palestine was fair towards the Arabs?

    I would say probably no.


    You see, we must understand their rage. They were a conquered people under British rule post ww1, they were promised freedom if they rebelled against Turks and help Britain in WW1, but after WW1 they were still not free, still a colony, now under
    British rule, which was subverted by Jews, who were working towards Jewish interests, allowing mass immigration of Jews into Palestine.

    Arabs, had they had their own sovereignty, would certainly not have allowed that. And even if they let some Jews in, they would not have allowed a separate, exclusive Jewish state.

    If Arabs got what they wanted post ww1, they'd probably recreated some of their medieval empire, not created bunch of states.

    So Arabs were in a unique situation.

    Members of their enemy tribe (Jews) have subverted global superpower (British) who were the masters there and then British opened the gates for Jews to move there, ignoring Arab objections.


    Hers a fun short clip of 30 seconds from Arab movie relating to those times.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=W3HbJFp4t9EeCMVa&v=HN3qR2H4jGY&feature=youtu.be


    Imagine if the British allowed the mass migrations of Chinese into India during their rule in India, and a British official in charge of that was a chink?

    Yes, it's irritating for the people affected.


    Funnily, it's same today. Again a Jew that's high within ranks of global power is the one who decides in the interests of his tribesmen.

    When US secretary of state Blinken visited Israel days ago he said...

    https://globalbihari.com/i-come-before-you-not-only-as-the-united-states-secretary-of-state-but-also-as-a-jew/




    So all of this leaves a bitter taste in their mouth. Arabs feel their land was stolen from them. It was not them who expelled Jews from Palestine (Judea) in the first place, Roman empire did in year 70.

    And then Jews "return". How can you allegedly return 1900 years later and demand even a piece of it, let alone whole land?


    So the Arabs who want to see no Israel, want to see it destroyed are not as radical as they're presented in Jewish media in the west.

    Destroying a state entity is different from destroying people.

    USA completely destroyed Confederate States of America. But they didn't kill people.

    Most of Arabs and Moslems who even want to "destroy Israel" want to destroy it in that fashion. Genocide of the Jews is more of a Jewish propaganda for gullible westerners.



    So how did the British mandate end after WW2? Jews were now even more powerful and the Jews who run those affairs in Britain made sure Israel gets more than 50% of Palestine even though they were only third of the people by 1948.

    Get it? Arabs were furious that there are even Jews there at all, let alone that they got more then 50% of Palestine when they're about a third of population.

    Israel declared independence in 1948 within boundaries that they received, and Arabs being angry attacked them.

    But the thing is, Israel was attacked by another countries, by Egypt, by Jordan etc.


    Israel won the war and even expanded their terrority at the expense of the rest of the former British mandate.


    So "Arabs in Palestine" lose land, because another countries attacked Israel.

    Sounds dumb, but ok.


    Then UN and the world acknowledged those changes, and let Israel have even more of British Palestine which made Arabs even more angry.


    But the thing is, the areas of former British mandate that Israel didn't conquer in 1948, were occupied by Egypt, Jordan etc.

    Those are the present day West Bank, Gaza etc.

    Jordan, Egypt didn't annex those territories and made it part of their countries, didn't issue passports to people etc.

    Those Arabs in the reaming parts of British Palestine were now under occupation by another Arab nations.

    Then in 1967 new Israel Arab war broke out, Israel seized those areas from Egypt and Jordan and now all territories of British Palestine was either Israel, or Israeli occupied.

    Israel too didn't annex west bank and Gaza because they don't want to issue passports to people there, they don't want multicultural state, they want Jewish state, but they also want that land.


    Being occupied is not some vague term. It means you're under military rule with no civil rights.


    And they've kept those areas under occupation since 1967, when UN passed last resolution, affirming Israel's right for an even greater Israel, acknowledging all of their gains in wars 1948-1967 but stipulating that the last remnants of British mandate
    of Palestine must be given their freedom ie statehood.

    Israel is ignoring that, has been building settlements and cities, colonizing West Bank, and all of those areas are outside of Israel. Also Gaza was under blockade for the last 2 decades or so.



    To sum it up, Germany and Japan were under occupation following ww2 and it lasted a couple of years.

    The remnants of British mandate of Palestine that are supposed to be Arab state next to a Jewish state is under occupation since the mandate ended.

    Israel was created in 1948.

    At the same time (the rest of) Palestine was occupied by Egypt, Jordan. And in 1967 it was occupied by Israel.


    So you give Hitler to the world, you end up being under occupation 1945-1949. 4 years.

    You live for thousands of years on your land, or at least hundreds, and you get 75 years of occupation, last 56 under Jews who build new cities on your land all the time, stealing more and more.


    Imagine if Germany was still occupied and a French and a British and American and Russian settlers moving in and French majority cities were being built and popping out in Bavarian Alps in 2023, Russian Noviy Berlin was being built next to Berlin and
    so on.

    Occupation of Germany ended in 1949, after 4 years.

    Occupation of Palestine should also end after 75 years, of which last 56 is done by the Israel.

    It says the last valid UN decision.



    Israel has options.

    1. Ethnic cleansing. Expell all Arabs from the remaining British Palestine and annex land with no people.

    2. Decent conquest. Annex all Palestine and issue passports, create multicultural Israel like the Jews promote in western countries.

    3. Abandon occupied territories and return inside Israeli borders.
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
    What an awful lot of words, and they still do not prove thatwhat I wrote was a lie or even fake news. Just to remind you I wrote:
    "Isn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.
    IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.
    The Arab nations (and presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and invaded the newly proclaimed Israel.
    And lost out big.
    And they are still at it."
    Nowhere have you proved I was wrong!
    BTW have a look at this United Nations website page that proves my statement. https://www.un.org/unispal/data-collection/general-assembly/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to Gerrit 't Hart on Wed Oct 18 16:07:39 2023
    "Gerrit 't Hart" <gthart@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 19:16:41 UTC+8, *skriptis wrote:> "Gerrit 't Hart" <gth...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:> > Hello SkriptisPlease tell me what is fake and/or lying about my comment.Gerrit > > > > There's a logical fallacy in your post
    and in overall understanding of the situation. > > I'll give you a counter example. > > Even if we place entire blame on Germany for starting or causing ww1, it's absurd and impossible to punish them or try to punish them for anything related to ww1 in
    this year, 2023. > > Not only because ww1 happened long time ago 1914-1918, but because ww1 was done, was settled, rightly or wrongly, and then even that post ww1 structure collapsed, we had ww2 in 1939-1945, and a new reality after that altogether. > >
    So the post ww1 structure, or ww1 as a cause of anything today is a moot point. > > Yes it's important to know all of it, and it's not a prehistoric era, there's a lot of cause and effect, but it's not relevant in legal sense. It's indeed history. > > >
    I think we can also agree that 1948 is a year 0 or day 0 in Israeli-Arab relations because that's moment when state of Israel was created. That's when the history sort of begins in terms of state relations. > > But new reality, new UN resolution and all
    that, was created in 1967, following their last war. So the 1948 events are irrelevant. > > Prehistory is before 1948, before Jewish state was created, then history is 1948-1967 and 1967-present day is politics. > > 1967 UN resolutions still aren't
    implemented and alternatively new ones have not been passed. > > So that's the problem you can discuss if you want. > > If you want to solve problems, you deal with politics, you can't touch history or even prehistory. > > > > > So to put this kinda in
    comparison. > > Anything before 1948 is "prehistory" in terms of relations between the two sides. State of Israel did not exist and we can only discuss whose people are more right or wrong, who has the moral high ground etc. Jewish propaganda made sure
    people in the west think it's the Jews who have the moral high ground. In my view, it's absolutely opposite from that. > > Bunch of Jews meeting in Basel, Switzerland in 1881 at a first Zionist congress and deciding they'll conquer Palestine is as
    agressive move as Hitler forming his nazi party and pursuing policy of destroying Russia to seize the lands for Germans in eastern Europe. > > It's a form of conquest. > > You don't get to have moral high ground when you do that. > > We can accept it
    once it's done, and you have to live with that, e.g. like white Europeans conquering North America, new nations have been formed, facts on the ground are established, that's the reality, but please, spare me of propaganda. > > Does anyone in USA e.g.
    claim it's awesome that whites conquered North America and prevented redskins from establishing their nations? It's good for whites, I guess, but there's no much gloating anymore? > > Jews otoh claim it's awesome that they've conquered middle east. For
    an impartial observer it's absurd, but western people buy it. Partly because of distorted and heretical protestant Christianity nowadays who are into Jew worshiping, and of course holocaust guilt that some Europeans enjoy to experience. > > The real
    truth, if you want to debate pre-1948, as a fun, then Jews don't have the moral high ground in relation to Palestinians. They have low ground. > > > Following collapse of medieval Arab empires, right through modernity, the middle east was held by Ottoman
    Turks for centuries. And then by British following WW1. > > > British mandate was established in 1918 and Jews started moving to Palestine. > > The first british high commissioner was a Jew. > > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Samuel,_1st_
    Viscount_Samuel > > He was the first nominally-practising Jew to serve as a Cabinet minister and to become the leader of a major British political party. Samuel had promoted Zionism within the British Cabinet, beginning with his 1915 memorandum entitled
    The Future of Palestine. In 1920 he was appointed as the first High Commissioner for Palestine, in charge of the administration of the territory. > > > > > So do you think the whole British rule in Palestine was fair towards the Arabs? > > I would say
    probably no. > > > You see, we must understand their rage. They were a conquered people under British rule post ww1, they were promised freedom if they rebelled against Turks and help Britain in WW1, but after WW1 they were still not free, still a colony,
    now under British rule, which was subverted by Jews, who were working towards Jewish interests, allowing mass immigration of Jews into Palestine. > > Arabs, had they had their own sovereignty, would certainly not have allowed that. And even if they let
    some Jews in, they would not have allowed a separate, exclusive Jewish state. > > If Arabs got what they wanted post ww1, they'd probably recreated some of their medieval empire, not created bunch of states. > > So Arabs were in a unique situation. > >
    Members of their enemy tribe (Jews) have subverted global superpower (British) who were the masters there and then British opened the gates for Jews to move there, ignoring Arab objections. > > > Hers a fun short clip of 30 seconds from Arab movie
    relating to those times. > > https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=W3HbJFp4t9EeCMVa&v=HN3qR2H4jGY&feature=youtu.be > > > Imagine if the British allowed the mass migrations of Chinese into India during their rule in India, and a British official in charge of
    that was a chink? > > Yes, it's irritating for the people affected. > > > Funnily, it's same today. Again a Jew that's high within ranks of global power is the one who decides in the interests of his tribesmen. > > When US secretary of state Blinken
    visited Israel days ago he said... > > https://globalbihari.com/i-come-before-you-not-only-as-the-united-states-secretary-of-state-but-also-as-a-jew/ > > > > > So all of this leaves a bitter taste in their mouth. Arabs feel their land was stolen from
    them. It was not them who expelled Jews from Palestine (Judea) in the first place, Roman empire did in year 70. > > And then Jews "return". How can you allegedly return 1900 years later and demand even a piece of it, let alone whole land? > > > So the
    Arabs who want to see no Israel, want to see it destroyed are not as radical as they're presented in Jewish media in the west. > > Destroying a state entity is different from destroying people. > > USA completely destroyed Confederate States of America.
    But they didn't kill people. > > Most of Arabs and Moslems who even want to "destroy Israel" want to destroy it in that fashion. Genocide of the Jews is more of a Jewish propaganda for gullible westerners. > > > > So how did the British mandate end after
    WW2? Jews were now even more powerful and the Jews who run those affairs in Britain made sure Israel gets more than 50% of Palestine even though they were only third of the people by 1948. > > Get it? Arabs were furious that there are even Jews there at
    all, let alone that they got more then 50% of Palestine when they're about a third of population. > > Israel declared independence in 1948 within boundaries that they received, and Arabs being angry attacked them. > > But the thing is, Israel was
    attacked by another countries, by Egypt, by Jordan etc. > > > Israel won the war and even expanded their terrority at the expense of the rest of the former British mandate. > > > So "Arabs in Palestine" lose land, because another countries attacked
    Israel. > > Sounds dumb, but ok. > > > Then UN and the world acknowledged those changes, and let Israel have even more of British Palestine which made Arabs even more angry. > > > But the thing is, the areas of former British mandate that Israel didn't
    conquer in 1948, were occupied by Egypt, Jordan etc. > > Those are the present day West Bank, Gaza etc. > > Jordan, Egypt didn't annex those territories and made it part of their countries, didn't issue passports to people etc. > > Those Arabs in the
    reaming parts of British Palestine were now under occupation by another Arab nations. > > Then in 1967 new Israel Arab war broke out, Israel seized those areas from Egypt and Jordan and now all territories of British Palestine was either Israel, or
    Israeli occupied. > > Israel too didn't annex west bank and Gaza because they don't want to issue passports to people there, they don't want multicultural state, they want Jewish state, but they also want that land. > > > Being occupied is not some vague
    term. It means you're under military rule with no civil rights. > > > And they've kept those areas under occupation since 1967, when UN passed last resolution, affirming Israel's right for an even greater Israel, acknowledging all of their gains in wars
    1948-1967 but stipulating that the last remnants of British mandate of Palestine must be given their freedom ie statehood. > > Israel is ignoring that, has been building settlements and cities, colonizing West Bank, and all of those areas are outside of
    Israel. Also Gaza was under blockade for the last 2 decades or so. > > > > To sum it up, Germany and Japan were under occupation following ww2 and it lasted a couple of years. > > The remnants of British mandate of Palestine that are supposed to be Arab
    state next to a Jewish state is under occupation since the mandate ended. > > Israel was created in 1948. > > At the same time (the rest of) Palestine was occupied by Egypt, Jordan. And in 1967 it was occupied by Israel. > > > So you give Hitler to the
    world, you end up being under occupation 1945-1949. 4 years. > > You live for thousands of years on your land, or at least hundreds, and you get 75 years of occupation, last 56 under Jews who build new cities on your land all the time, stealing more and
    more. > > > Imagine if Germany was still occupied and a French and a British and American and Russian settlers moving in and French majority cities were being built and popping out in Bavarian Alps in 2023, Russian Noviy Berlin was being built next to
    Berlin and so on. > > Occupation of Germany ended in 1949, after 4 years. > > Occupation of Palestine should also end after 75 years, of which last 56 is done by the Israel. > > It says the last valid UN decision. > > > > Israel has options. > > 1.
    Ethnic cleansing. Expell all Arabs from the remaining British Palestine and annex land with no people. > > 2. Decent conquest. Annex all Palestine and issue passports, create multicultural Israel like the Jews promote in western countries. > > 3. Abandon
    occupied territories and return inside Israeli borders.> -- > > > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlWhat an awful lot of words, and they still do not prove thatwhat I wrote was a lie or
    even fake news. Just to remind you I wrote: "Isn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.The Arab nations (and presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and
    invaded the newly proclaimed Israel.And lost out big.And they are still at it."Nowhere have you proved I was wrong!BTW have a look at this United Nations website page that proves my statement. https://www.un.org/unispal/data-collection/general-assembly/



    I told you and explained that what happened in 1948 is not relevant.

    It's history.

    We discuss politics, present day problem. Not history.

    So that's fake news, mixing history that's not relevant.



    Jews stole cca half of Palestine, before 1948, UN legalized it, so Arabs tried to retake it, they lost war, Israel stole even more after winning that 1948 war, then UN legalized even that.

    That's history. 2 rounds of theft, legalized.


    And then Jews stole even more in 1967 war, which UN refuses to legalize, so their third round is mog legalized.

    Jews refusing to either give back land or finally annex it and give people there their civil rights.

    That's the current issue.

    Only Jews are to be blamed.




    Germans were occupied by the allies in 1945-1949.

    Palestineans are occupied by the Jews 1967-present day.

    4 years vs 56.

    For Hitler you get 4 years.
    Why do you get 56 years for?


    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bmoore@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 18 10:54:48 2023
    On Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 7:07:39 AM UTC-7, *skriptis wrote:
    "Gerrit 't Hart" <gth...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 19:16:41 UTC+8, *skriptis wrote:> "Gerrit 't Hart" <gth...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:> > Hello SkriptisPlease tell me what is fake and/or lying about my comment.Gerrit > > > > There's a logical fallacy in your post
    and in overall understanding of the situation. > > I'll give you a counter example. > > Even if we place entire blame on Germany for starting or causing ww1, it's absurd and impossible to punish them or try to punish them for anything related to ww1 in
    this year, 2023. > > Not only because ww1 happened long time ago 1914-1918, but because ww1 was done, was settled, rightly or wrongly, and then even that post ww1 structure collapsed, we had ww2 in 1939-1945, and a new reality after that altogether. > >
    So the post ww1 structure, or ww1 as a cause of anything today is a moot point. > > Yes it's important to know all of it, and it's not a prehistoric era, there's a lot of cause and effect, but it's not relevant in legal sense. It's indeed history. > > >
    I think we can also agree that 1948 is a year 0 or day 0 in Israeli-Arab relations because that's moment when state of Israel was created. That's when the history sort of begins in terms of state relations. > > But new reality, new UN resolution and all
    that, was created in 1967, following their last war. So the 1948 events are irrelevant. > > Prehistory is before 1948, before Jewish state was created, then history is 1948-1967 and 1967-present day is politics. > > 1967 UN resolutions still aren't
    implemented and alternatively new ones have not been passed. > > So that's the problem you can discuss if you want. > > If you want to solve problems, you deal with politics, you can't touch history or even prehistory. > > > > > So to put this kinda in
    comparison. > > Anything before 1948 is "prehistory" in terms of relations between the two sides. State of Israel did not exist and we can only discuss whose people are more right or wrong, who has the moral high ground etc. Jewish propaganda made sure
    people in the west think it's the Jews who have the moral high ground. In my view, it's absolutely opposite from that. > > Bunch of Jews meeting in Basel, Switzerland in 1881 at a first Zionist congress and deciding they'll conquer Palestine is as
    agressive move as Hitler forming his nazi party and pursuing policy of destroying Russia to seize the lands for Germans in eastern Europe. > > It's a form of conquest. > > You don't get to have moral high ground when you do that. > > We can accept it
    once it's done, and you have to live with that, e.g. like white Europeans conquering North America, new nations have been formed, facts on the ground are established, that's the reality, but please, spare me of propaganda. > > Does anyone in USA e.g.
    claim it's awesome that whites conquered North America and prevented redskins from establishing their nations? It's good for whites, I guess, but there's no much gloating anymore? > > Jews otoh claim it's awesome that they've conquered middle east. For
    an impartial observer it's absurd, but western people buy it. Partly because of distorted and heretical protestant Christianity nowadays who are into Jew worshiping, and of course holocaust guilt that some Europeans enjoy to experience. > > The real
    truth, if you want to debate pre-1948, as a fun, then Jews don't have the moral high ground in relation to Palestinians. They have low ground. > > > Following collapse of medieval Arab empires, right through modernity, the middle east was held by Ottoman
    Turks for centuries. And then by British following WW1. > > > British mandate was established in 1918 and Jews started moving to Palestine. > > The first british high commissioner was a Jew. > > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Samuel,_1st_
    Viscount_Samuel > > He was the first nominally-practising Jew to serve as a Cabinet minister and to become the leader of a major British political party. Samuel had promoted Zionism within the British Cabinet, beginning with his 1915 memorandum entitled
    The Future of Palestine. In 1920 he was appointed as the first High Commissioner for Palestine, in charge of the administration of the territory. > > > > > So do you think the whole British rule in Palestine was fair towards the Arabs? > > I would say
    probably no. > > > You see, we must understand their rage. They were a conquered people under British rule post ww1, they were promised freedom if they rebelled against Turks and help Britain in WW1, but after WW1 they were still not free, still a colony,
    now under British rule, which was subverted by Jews, who were working towards Jewish interests, allowing mass immigration of Jews into Palestine. > > Arabs, had they had their own sovereignty, would certainly not have allowed that. And even if they let
    some Jews in, they would not have allowed a separate, exclusive Jewish state. > > If Arabs got what they wanted post ww1, they'd probably recreated some of their medieval empire, not created bunch of states. > > So Arabs were in a unique situation. > >
    Members of their enemy tribe (Jews) have subverted global superpower (British) who were the masters there and then British opened the gates for Jews to move there, ignoring Arab objections. > > > Hers a fun short clip of 30 seconds from Arab movie
    relating to those times. > > https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=W3HbJFp4t9EeCMVa&v=HN3qR2H4jGY&feature=youtu.be > > > Imagine if the British allowed the mass migrations of Chinese into India during their rule in India, and a British official in charge of
    that was a chink? > > Yes, it's irritating for the people affected. > > > Funnily, it's same today. Again a Jew that's high within ranks of global power is the one who decides in the interests of his tribesmen. > > When US secretary of state Blinken
    visited Israel days ago he said... > > https://globalbihari.com/i-come-before-you-not-only-as-the-united-states-secretary-of-state-but-also-as-a-jew/ > > > > > So all of this leaves a bitter taste in their mouth. Arabs feel their land was stolen from
    them. It was not them who expelled Jews from Palestine (Judea) in the first place, Roman empire did in year 70. > > And then Jews "return". How can you allegedly return 1900 years later and demand even a piece of it, let alone whole land? > > > So the
    Arabs who want to see no Israel, want to see it destroyed are not as radical as they're presented in Jewish media in the west. > > Destroying a state entity is different from destroying people. > > USA completely destroyed Confederate States of America.
    But they didn't kill people. > > Most of Arabs and Moslems who even want to "destroy Israel" want to destroy it in that fashion. Genocide of the Jews is more of a Jewish propaganda for gullible westerners. > > > > So how did the British mandate end after
    WW2? Jews were now even more powerful and the Jews who run those affairs in Britain made sure Israel gets more than 50% of Palestine even though they were only third of the people by 1948. > > Get it? Arabs were furious that there are even Jews there at
    all, let alone that they got more then 50% of Palestine when they're about a third of population. > > Israel declared independence in 1948 within boundaries that they received, and Arabs being angry attacked them. > > But the thing is, Israel was
    attacked by another countries, by Egypt, by Jordan etc. > > > Israel won the war and even expanded their terrority at the expense of the rest of the former British mandate. > > > So "Arabs in Palestine" lose land, because another countries attacked
    Israel. > > Sounds dumb, but ok. > > > Then UN and the world acknowledged those changes, and let Israel have even more of British Palestine which made Arabs even more angry. > > > But the thing is, the areas of former British mandate that Israel didn't
    conquer in 1948, were occupied by Egypt, Jordan etc. > > Those are the present day West Bank, Gaza etc. > > Jordan, Egypt didn't annex those territories and made it part of their countries, didn't issue passports to people etc. > > Those Arabs in the
    reaming parts of British Palestine were now under occupation by another Arab nations. > > Then in 1967 new Israel Arab war broke out, Israel seized those areas from Egypt and Jordan and now all territories of British Palestine was either Israel, or
    Israeli occupied. > > Israel too didn't annex west bank and Gaza because they don't want to issue passports to people there, they don't want multicultural state, they want Jewish state, but they also want that land. > > > Being occupied is not some vague
    term. It means you're under military rule with no civil rights. > > > And they've kept those areas under occupation since 1967, when UN passed last resolution, affirming Israel's right for an even greater Israel, acknowledging all of their gains in wars
    1948-1967 but stipulating that the last remnants of British mandate of Palestine must be given their freedom ie statehood. > > Israel is ignoring that, has been building settlements and cities, colonizing West Bank, and all of those areas are outside of
    Israel. Also Gaza was under blockade for the last 2 decades or so. > > > > To sum it up, Germany and Japan were under occupation following ww2 and it lasted a couple of years. > > The remnants of British mandate of Palestine that are supposed to be Arab
    state next to a Jewish state is under occupation since the mandate ended. > > Israel was created in 1948. > > At the same time (the rest of) Palestine was occupied by Egypt, Jordan. And in 1967 it was occupied by Israel. > > > So you give Hitler to the
    world, you end up being under occupation 1945-1949. 4 years. > > You live for thousands of years on your land, or at least hundreds, and you get 75 years of occupation, last 56 under Jews who build new cities on your land all the time, stealing more and
    more. > > > Imagine if Germany was still occupied and a French and a British and American and Russian settlers moving in and French majority cities were being built and popping out in Bavarian Alps in 2023, Russian Noviy Berlin was being built next to
    Berlin and so on. > > Occupation of Germany ended in 1949, after 4 years. > > Occupation of Palestine should also end after 75 years, of which last 56 is done by the Israel. > > It says the last valid UN decision. > > > > Israel has options. > > 1.
    Ethnic cleansing. Expell all Arabs from the remaining British Palestine and annex land with no people. > > 2. Decent conquest. Annex all Palestine and issue passports, create multicultural Israel like the Jews promote in western countries. > > 3. Abandon
    occupied territories and return inside Israeli borders.> -- > > > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlWhat an awful lot of words, and they still do not prove thatwhat I wrote was a lie or
    even fake news. Just to remind you I wrote: "Isn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.The Arab nations (and presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and
    invaded the newly proclaimed Israel.And lost out big.And they are still at it."Nowhere have you proved I was wrong!BTW have a look at this United Nations website page that proves my statement. https://www.un.org/unispal/data-collection/general-assembly/



    I told you and explained that what happened in 1948 is not relevant.

    It's history.

    We discuss politics, present day problem. Not history.

    So that's fake news, mixing history that's not relevant.



    Jews stole cca half of Palestine, before 1948, UN legalized it, so Arabs tried to retake it, they lost war, Israel stole even more after winning that 1948 war, then UN legalized even that.

    That's history. 2 rounds of theft, legalized.


    And then Jews stole even more in 1967 war, which UN refuses to legalize, so their third round is mog legalized.

    Jews refusing to either give back land or finally annex it and give people there their civil rights.

    That's the current issue.

    Only Jews are to be blamed.

    Riiight.

    Germans were occupied by the allies in 1945-1949.

    Because Germany stopped attacking people.

    How do you feel about the Berlin airlift?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to bmoore on Wed Oct 18 22:43:54 2023
    bmoore <bmoore@nyx.net> Wrote in message:r
    On Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 7:07:39 AM UTC-7, *skriptis wrote:> "Gerrit 't Hart" <gth...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > > On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 19:16:41 UTC+8, *skriptis wrote:> "Gerrit 't Hart" <gth...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:>
    Hello SkriptisPlease tell me what is fake and/or lying about my comment.Gerrit > > > > There's a logical fallacy in your post and in overall understanding of the situation. > > I'll give you a counter example. > > Even if we place entire blame on
    Germany for starting or causing ww1, it's absurd and impossible to punish them or try to punish them for anything related to ww1 in this year, 2023. > > Not only because ww1 happened long time ago 1914-1918, but because ww1 was done, was settled, rightly
    or wrongly, and then even that post ww1 structure collapsed, we had ww2 in 1939-1945, and a new reality after that altogether. > > So the post ww1 structure, or ww1 as a cause of anything today is a moot point. > > Yes it's important to know all of it,
    and it's not a prehistoric era, there's a lot of cause and effect, but it's not relevant in legal sense. It's indeed history. > > > I think we can also agree that 1948 is a year 0 or day 0 in Israeli-Arab relations because that's moment when state of
    Israel was created. That's when the history sort of begins in terms of state relations. > > But new reality, new UN resolution and all that, was created in 1967, following their last war. So the 1948 events are irrelevant. > > Prehistory is before 1948,
    before Jewish state was created, then history is 1948-1967 and 1967-present day is politics. > > 1967 UN resolutions still aren't implemented and alternatively new ones have not been passed. > > So that's the problem you can discuss if you want. > > If
    you want to solve problems, you deal with politics, you can't touch history or even prehistory. > > > > > So to put this kinda in comparison. > > Anything before 1948 is "prehistory" in terms of relations between the two sides. State of Israel did not
    exist and we can only discuss whose people are more right or wrong, who has the moral high ground etc. Jewish propaganda made sure people in the west think it's the Jews who have the moral high ground. In my view, it's absolutely opposite from that. > >
    Bunch of Jews meeting in Basel, Switzerland in 1881 at a first Zionist congress and deciding they'll conquer Palestine is as agressive move as Hitler forming his nazi party and pursuing policy of destroying Russia to seize the lands for Germans in
    eastern Europe. > > It's a form of conquest. > > You don't get to have moral high ground when you do that. > > We can accept it once it's done, and you have to live with that, e.g. like white Europeans conquering North America, new nations have been
    formed, facts on the ground are established, that's the reality, but please, spare me of propaganda. > > Does anyone in USA e.g. claim it's awesome that whites conquered North America and prevented redskins from establishing their nations? It's good for
    whites, I guess, but there's no much gloating anymore? > > Jews otoh claim it's awesome that they've conquered middle east. For an impartial observer it's absurd, but western people buy it. Partly because of distorted and heretical protestant
    Christianity nowadays who are into Jew worshiping, and of course holocaust guilt that some Europeans enjoy to experience. > > The real truth, if you want to debate pre-1948, as a fun, then Jews don't have the moral high ground in relation to Palestinians.
    They have low ground. > > > Following collapse of medieval Arab empires, right through modernity, the middle east was held by Ottoman Turks for centuries. And then by British following WW1. > > > British mandate was established in 1918 and Jews started
    moving to Palestine. > > The first british high commissioner was a Jew. > > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Samuel,_1st_Viscount_Samuel > > He was the first nominally-practising Jew to serve as a Cabinet minister and to become the leader of a
    major British political party. Samuel had promoted Zionism within the British Cabinet, beginning with his 1915 memorandum entitled The Future of Palestine. In 1920 he was appointed as the first High Commissioner for Palestine, in charge of the
    administration of the territory. > > > > > So do you think the whole British rule in Palestine was fair towards the Arabs? > > I would say probably no. > > > You see, we must understand their rage. They were a conquered people under British rule post ww1,
    they were promised freedom if they rebelled against Turks and help Britain in WW1, but after WW1 they were still not free, still a colony, now under British rule, which was subverted by Jews, who were working towards Jewish interests, allowing mass
    immigration of Jews into Palestine. > > Arabs, had they had their own sovereignty, would certainly not have allowed that. And even if they let some Jews in, they would not have allowed a separate, exclusive Jewish state. > > If Arabs got what they wanted
    post ww1, they'd probably recreated some of their medieval empire, not created bunch of states. > > So Arabs were in a unique situation. > > Members of their enemy tribe (Jews) have subverted global superpower (British) who were the masters there and
    then British opened the gates for Jews to move there, ignoring Arab objections. > > > Hers a fun short clip of 30 seconds from Arab movie relating to those times. > > https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=W3HbJFp4t9EeCMVa&v=HN3qR2H4jGY&feature=youtu.be > > >
    Imagine if the British allowed the mass migrations of Chinese into India during their rule in India, and a British official in charge of that was a chink? > > Yes, it's irritating for the people affected. > > > Funnily, it's same today. Again a Jew that'
    s high within ranks of global power is the one who decides in the interests of his tribesmen. > > When US secretary of state Blinken visited Israel days ago he said... > > https://globalbihari.com/i-come-before-you-not-only-as-the-united-states-secretary-
    of-state-but-also-as-a-jew/ > > > > > So all of this leaves a bitter taste in their mouth. Arabs feel their land was stolen from them. It was not them who expelled Jews from Palestine (Judea) in the first place, Roman empire did in year 70. > > And then
    Jews "return". How can you allegedly return 1900 years later and demand even a piece of it, let alone whole land? > > > So the Arabs who want to see no Israel, want to see it destroyed are not as radical as they're presented in Jewish media in the west. >
    Destroying a state entity is different from destroying people. > > USA completely destroyed Confederate States of America. But they didn't kill people. > > Most of Arabs and Moslems who even want to "destroy Israel" want to destroy it in that fashion.
    Genocide of the Jews is more of a Jewish propaganda for gullible westerners. > > > > So how did the British mandate end after WW2? Jews were now even more powerful and the Jews who run those affairs in Britain made sure Israel gets more than 50% of
    Palestine even though they were only third of the people by 1948. > > Get it? Arabs were furious that there are even Jews there at all, let alone that they got more then 50% of Palestine when they're about a third of population. > > Israel declared
    independence in 1948 within boundaries that they received, and Arabs being angry attacked them. > > But the thing is, Israel was attacked by another countries, by Egypt, by Jordan etc. > > > Israel won the war and even expanded their terrority at the
    expense of the rest of the former British mandate. > > > So "Arabs in Palestine" lose land, because another countries attacked Israel. > > Sounds dumb, but ok. > > > Then UN and the world acknowledged those changes, and let Israel have even more of
    British Palestine which made Arabs even more angry. > > > But the thing is, the areas of former British mandate that Israel didn't conquer in 1948, were occupied by Egypt, Jordan etc. > > Those are the present day West Bank, Gaza etc. > > Jordan, Egypt
    didn't annex those territories and made it part of their countries, didn't issue passports to people etc. > > Those Arabs in the reaming parts of British Palestine were now under occupation by another Arab nations. > > Then in 1967 new Israel Arab war
    broke out, Israel seized those areas from Egypt and Jordan and now all territories of British Palestine was either Israel, or Israeli occupied. > > Israel too didn't annex west bank and Gaza because they don't want to issue passports to people there,
    they don't want multicultural state, they want Jewish state, but they also want that land. > > > Being occupied is not some vague term. It means you're under military rule with no civil rights. > > > And they've kept those areas under occupation since
    1967, when UN passed last resolution, affirming Israel's right for an even greater Israel, acknowledging all of their gains in wars 1948-1967 but stipulating that the last remnants of British mandate of Palestine must be given their freedom ie statehood.
    Israel is ignoring that, has been building settlements and cities, colonizing West Bank, and all of those areas are outside of Israel. Also Gaza was under blockade for the last 2 decades or so. > > > > To sum it up, Germany and Japan were under
    occupation following ww2 and it lasted a couple of years. > > The remnants of British mandate of Palestine that are supposed to be Arab state next to a Jewish state is under occupation since the mandate ended. > > Israel was created in 1948. > > At the
    same time (the rest of) Palestine was occupied by Egypt, Jordan. And in 1967 it was occupied by Israel. > > > So you give Hitler to the world, you end up being under occupation 1945-1949. 4 years. > > You live for thousands of years on your land, or at
    least hundreds, and you get 75 years of occupation, last 56 under Jews who build new cities on your land all the time, stealing more and more. > > > Imagine if Germany was still occupied and a French and a British and American and Russian settlers moving
    in and French majority cities were being built and popping out in Bavarian Alps in 2023, Russian Noviy Berlin was being built next to Berlin and so on. > > Occupation of Germany ended in 1949, after 4 years. > > Occupation of Palestine should also end
    after 75 years, of which last 56 is done by the Israel. > > It says the last valid UN decision. > > > > Israel has options. > > 1. Ethnic cleansing. Expell all Arabs from the remaining British Palestine and annex land with no people. > > 2. Decent
    conquest. Annex all Palestine and issue passports, create multicultural Israel like the Jews promote in western countries. > > 3. Abandon occupied territories and return inside Israeli borders.> -- > > > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://
    piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlWhat an awful lot of words, and they still do not prove thatwhat I wrote was a lie or even fake news. Just to remind you I wrote: "Isn't it ironic that 75 years ago the UN agreed to a 2 state solution.
    IIsrael accepted the UN resolution in 1948.The Arab nations (and presumably the peoplewho now call themselves Palestinians) did not and invaded the newly proclaimed Israel.And lost out big.And they are still at it."Nowhere have you proved I was wrong!BTW
    have a look at this United Nations website page that proves my statement. https://www.un.org/unispal/data-collection/general-assembly/ > > > > I told you and explained that what happened in 1948 is not relevant. > > It's history. > > We discuss politics,
    present day problem. Not history. > > So that's fake news, mixing history that's not relevant. > > > > Jews stole cca half of Palestine, before 1948, UN legalized it, so Arabs tried to retake it, they lost war, Israel stole even more after winning that
    1948 war, then UN legalized even that. > > That's history. 2 rounds of theft, legalized. > > > And then Jews stole even more in 1967 war, which UN refuses to legalize, so their third round is mog legalized. > > Jews refusing to either give back land or
    finally annex it and give people there their civil rights. > > That's the current issue. > > Only Jews are to be blamed. Riiight.> Germans were occupied by the allies in 1945-1949. Because Germany stopped attacking people.How do you feel about the Berlin
    airlift?


    I condemn all anti-Russian actions whenever.




    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)