https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E
https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E
On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:> https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the will to righteously punish.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 1.10.2023 klo 1.06:> https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E> > 448 dollars worth of skin care products... lol-Here's something completely unrelated...https://youtube.com/shorts/PTyceDkU2o0?si=nMu6wANKAJCyGla7
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r-Juan Carlos Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:> https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the will to righteously punish.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I done created myself a monster." -
Consequences
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-doors-on-nine-stores/amp/
On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:> https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the will to righteously punish.-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> Consequences>> https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/
On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rExactly. Three of them are in Portland, and they were prime locations.
On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the
will to righteously punish.--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I
done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos
Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consequences
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-doors-on-nine-stores/amp/
Nordstrom pulled out from a major site in 2015. Theft--flash mobs.
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>> On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>>> https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the>>will to righteously punish.-->> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I>> done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos>> Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>>
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rExactly. Three of them are in Portland, and they were prime locations.
On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the
will to righteously punish.--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I
done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos
Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consequences
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-doors-on-nine-stores/amp/
Nordstrom pulled out from a major site in 2015. Theft--flash mobs.But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead. Blaming it on theft
is easier for shareholders to swallow than blaming it on flagging sales.
jdeluise <jdel...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rto righteously punish.-->> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I>> done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos>> Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>> Consequences>>>
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:> On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>> Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>> On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>>> https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the>> will
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-doors-on-nine-stores/amp/>>>>> Exactly. Three of them are in Portland, and they were prime locations.>> Nordstrom pulled out from amajor site in 2015. Theft--flash mobs.But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead. Blaming it on theftis easier for shareholders to swallow than blaming it on flagging sales.
Yes, people don't need to buy stuff anymore.
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rExactly. Three of them are in Portland, and they were prime locations.
On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the
will to righteously punish.--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I
done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos
Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consequences
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-doors-on-nine-stores/amp/
Nordstrom pulled out from a major site in 2015. Theft--flash mobs.But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead. Blaming it on theft
is easier for shareholders to swallow than blaming it on flagging sales.
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 10:13:17 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rExactly. Three of them are in Portland, and they were prime locations.
On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the
will to righteously punish.--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I
done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos
Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consequences
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-doors-on-nine-stores/amp/
Obviously, it's Amazon.Nordstrom pulled out from a major site in 2015. Theft--flash mobs.But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead. Blaming it on theft
is easier for shareholders to swallow than blaming it on flagging sales.
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rwill to righteously punish.-->> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I>> done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos>> Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>>
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:> On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>> Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>> On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>>> https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the>>
Yes, people don't need to buy stuff anymore.
jdeluise kirjoitti 1.10.2023 klo 20.13:
But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead.
Are you sure?
Nordstrom didn't do poorly in 2015. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/JWN/nordstrom/revenue
But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead.
On 10/1/23 11:35 AM, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 1.10.2023 klo 20.13:
But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead.
Are you sure?
Nordstrom didn't do poorly in 2015.
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/JWN/nordstrom/revenue
These are some early incidents that led to the 2015 closure, which was announced in 2014:
https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2012/04/flash_mob_theft_at_lloyd_cente.html#:~:text=A%20flash%20mob%20of%20teenagers,surveillance%20video%20from%20the%20thefts.
Here's a video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JM64ijFUX8
Sawfish kirjoitti 1.10.2023 klo 22.13:
On 10/1/23 11:35 AM, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 1.10.2023 klo 20.13:
But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead.
Are you sure?
Nordstrom didn't do poorly in 2015.
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/JWN/nordstrom/revenue
These are some early incidents that led to the 2015 closure, which was announced in 2014:
https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2012/04/flash_mob_theft_at_lloyd_cente.html#:~:text=A%20flash%20mob%20of%20teenagers,surveillance%20video%20from%20the%20thefts.
Here's a video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JM64ijFUX8
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyV-u4hWYAMb3Fh.jpg
:))
On Sunday, 1 October 2023 at 18:58:05 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 10:13:17 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rExactly. Three of them are in Portland, and they were prime locations.
On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the >> will to righteously punish.--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I
done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos
Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consequences
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-doors-on-nine-stores/amp/
any excuse, rather than blaming your "community", right?Obviously, it's Amazon.Nordstrom pulled out from a major site in 2015. Theft--flash mobs.But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead. Blaming it on theft is easier for shareholders to swallow than blaming it on flagging sales.
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:
:))
"Retail" implies physical shopping locations... brick-and-mortar. I'm
just saying I think there are plenty of contributing factors. Maybe
theft was the straw that broke the camel's back though.
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 2:22:51 PM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:
:))
"Retail" implies physical shopping locations... brick-and-mortar. I'mThat's possible, but isn't it pretty clear that on-line shopping has put a big dent into brick and mortar sales?
just saying I think there are plenty of contributing factors. Maybe
theft was the straw that broke the camel's back though.
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 11:04:36 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Sunday, 1 October 2023 at 18:58:05 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 10:13:17 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rExactly. Three of them are in Portland, and they were prime locations.
On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:>https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E>>>>The US public has lost the
will to righteously punish.--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"I
done created myself a monster." --Juan Carlos
Ferrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consequences
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-doors-on-nine-stores/amp/
Super dumb comment, from a Communist.any excuse, rather than blaming your "community", right?Obviously, it's Amazon.Nordstrom pulled out from a major site in 2015. Theft--flash mobs.But the real reason/problem is that retail is dead. Blaming it on theft
is easier for shareholders to swallow than blaming it on flagging sales.
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 06:43:39 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 2:22:51 PM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:
:))
boo hoo keep on pretending to be deluded that it's "market conditions""Retail" implies physical shopping locations... brick-and-mortar. I'm just saying I think there are plenty of contributing factors. Maybe theft was the straw that broke the camel's back though.That's possible, but isn't it pretty clear that on-line shopping has put a big dent into brick and mortar sales?
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 06:38:49 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:> On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 11:04:36AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: > > On Sunday, 1 October 2023 at 18:58:05 UTC+1, bmoore wrote: > > > On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 10:13:17AM UTC-7,jdeluise wrote: > > > > Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > > On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote: > > > > >> Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > > > > >>> On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:> > > > > >> https://
doors-on-nine-stores/amp/ > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Exactly. Three of them are in Portland, and they were prime locations. > > > > > > > > > > Nordstrom pulled out from a major site in 2015. Theft--flash mobs. > > > > But the real reason/problem isFerrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > >> Consequences > > > > >> > > > > >> https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-
It's funny how the dual jd/bm felt obligated to defend organized
crime, no matter what their excuses are, just the matter of having
doubts about its impact on retail.
https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2023/10/02/retail-theft-totaled-112-billion-in-2022-says-nrf/95145/
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjdeluise wrote: > > > > Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > > On 9/30/23 5:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote: > > > > >> Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > > > > >>> On 9/30/23 3:06 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:> > > > > >> https://
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 06:38:49 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:> On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 11:04:36 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: > > On Sunday, 1 October 2023 at 18:58:05 UTC+1, bmoore wrote: > > > On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 10:13:17 AM UTC-7,
doors-on-nine-stores/amp/ > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Exactly. Three of them are in Portland, and they were prime locations. > > > > > > > > > > Nordstrom pulled out from a major site in 2015. Theft--flash mobs. > > > > But the real reason/problem isFerrero~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > >> Consequences > > > > >> > > > > >> https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/markfaithfull/2023/09/28/target-blames-organized-crime-for-closing-
It's funny how the dual jd/bm felt obligated to defend organized crime, no matter what their excuses are, just the matter of having doubts about its impact on retail.
https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2023/10/02/retail-theft-totaled-112-billion-in-2022-says-nrf/95145/
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame
the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds
of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> writes:>> they can't helpthemselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame> the criminals or
the "community", there'll always always be hundreds> of excuses why
it's not the bad guys.Neither of you have proposed any remedies for
the situation.
You don't realize you're a troll provocateur now?
Proposing remedies to end unlawful behaviour?
Wow.
Guess what, there's nothing to propose there.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> writes:>> they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame> the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds> of excuses why it's not the bad guys.Neither of you have proposedany remedies for the situation.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> writes:> jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> writes:>> they can't help> themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame> the criminals or> the "community",there'll always always be hundreds> of excuses why> it's not the bad guys.Neither of you have proposed any remedies for> the situation.>>>> You don't realize you're a troll provocateur now?>> Proposing remedies to end unlawful behaviour?>> Wow.>>>> Guess
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blameNeither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds
of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame
the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds
of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
On 2.10.2023 22.50, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame
the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds
of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.No difference with the "woke" debate style.
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 12:58:31 PM UTC-7, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
On 2.10.2023 22.50, bmoore wrote:True dat. Everyone should simply speak their minds. You know, just think things through and attempt to make sense.
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:No difference with the "woke" debate style.
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blameNeither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds >>>>> of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blameNeither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds
of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
On 10/2/23 1:16 PM, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 12:58:31 PM UTC-7, Pelle Svanslös wrote:Agreed.
On 2.10.2023 22.50, bmoore wrote:True dat. Everyone should simply speak their minds. You know, just think things through and attempt to make sense.
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:No difference with the "woke" debate style.
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame >>>>> the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds >>>>> of excuses why it's not the bad guys.Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
If this is done with the sort of honesty and mutual respect that happens
in our exchanges, everything is cool.
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blameNeither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds
of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 20:51:00 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
out, like classic devious Marxists. Then there's the Marxist Bernie Sanders who even had his honeymoon in the USSR and dropped "Democratic" from his party name when he $old out and his campaign crashed in 2020.errmm the BLM guys are admitted Marxists, they said so on their "About Us" page which was up there for all to see when the riots they provoked using that career criminal George Floyd kicked off, then they took it off when people started pointing thisI rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds of excuses why it's not the bad guys.Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 20:51:00 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
out, like classic devious Marxists. Then there's the Marxist Bernie Sanders who even had his honeymoon in the USSR and dropped "Democratic" from his party name when he $old out and his campaign crashed in 2020.they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds of excuses why it's not the bad guys.Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
errmm the BLM guys are admitted Marxists, they said so on their "About Us" page which was up there for all to see when the riots they provoked using that career criminal George Floyd kicked off, then they took it off when people started pointing this
On 10/2/23 1:16 PM, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 12:58:31 PM UTC-7, Pelle Svanslös wrote:Agreed.
On 2.10.2023 22.50, bmoore wrote:True dat. Everyone should simply speak their minds. You know, just think things through and attempt to make sense.
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:No difference with the "woke" debate style.
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame >>>>> the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds >>>>> of excuses why it's not the bad guys.Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
If this is done with the sort of honesty and mutual respect that happens
in our exchanges, everything is cool.
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 5:40:56 PM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 10/2/23 1:16 PM, bmoore wrote:Yes. BTW, when you said the other day that you were booted from Redditt, what did you actually say? Seems like you might have been provoked?
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 12:58:31 PM UTC-7, Pelle Svanslös wrote: >>>> On 2.10.2023 22.50, bmoore wrote:Agreed.
True dat. Everyone should simply speak their minds. You know, just think things through and attempt to make sense.On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:No difference with the "woke" debate style.
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame >>>>>>> the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds >>>>>>> of excuses why it's not the bad guys.Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
If this is done with the sort of honesty and mutual respect that happens
in our exchanges, everything is cool.
On 10/3/23 8:44 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 5:40:56 PM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:I think what I said was presented by my interlocutor as an actual
On 10/2/23 1:16 PM, bmoore wrote:Yes. BTW, when you said the other day that you were booted from Redditt, what did you actually say? Seems like you might have been provoked?
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 12:58:31 PM UTC-7, Pelle Svanslös wrote:Agreed.
On 2.10.2023 22.50, bmoore wrote:True dat. Everyone should simply speak their minds. You know, just think things through and attempt to make sense.
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote: >>>>>> The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:No difference with the "woke" debate style.
I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame >>>>>>> the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds >>>>>>> of excuses why it's not the bad guys.Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
If this is done with the sort of honesty and mutual respect that happens >> in our exchanges, everything is cool.
personal threat.
I said that if you think that words are actual "violence", you have
never been punched in the face. Then you would know the difference.
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 1:09:19 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:out, like classic devious Marxists. Then there's the Marxist Bernie Sanders who even had his honeymoon in the USSR and dropped "Democratic" from his party name when he $old out and his campaign crashed in 2020.
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 20:51:00 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame
the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds >>>>> of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
errmm the BLM guys are admitted Marxists, they said so on their "About Us" page which was up there for all to see when the riots they provoked using that career criminal George Floyd kicked off, then they took it off when people started pointing this
His campaign "crashed" because the other Democrat candidates ganged up and torpedoed him. He was doing pretty well until then. He still wouldn't have survived primaries in the South, but that's almost a badge of honor. This was Bernie's own "Lost Cause."
Gracchus kirjoitti 3.10.2023 klo 18.33:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 1:09:19 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 20:51:00 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame >>>>>> the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds >>>>>> of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023.
It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
errmm the BLM guys are admitted Marxists, they said so on their
"About Us" page which was up there for all to see when the riots
they provoked using that career criminal George Floyd kicked off,
then they took it off when people started pointing this out, like
classic devious Marxists. Then there's the Marxist Bernie Sanders
who even had his honeymoon in the USSR and dropped "Democratic" from
his party name when he $old out and his campaign crashed in 2020.
His campaign "crashed" because the other Democrat candidates ganged
up and torpedoed him. He was doing pretty well until then. He still
wouldn't have survived primaries in the South, but that's almost a
badge of honor. This was Bernie's own "Lost Cause."
And Bernie fanboys torpedoed Warren. I still think she would have made
heck of a president.
You're shitting me, right?
Gracchus kirjoitti 3.10.2023 klo 18.33:this out, like classic devious Marxists. Then there's the Marxist Bernie Sanders who even had his honeymoon in the USSR and dropped "Democratic" from his party name when he $old out and his campaign crashed in 2020.
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 1:09:19 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 20:51:00 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:04:29 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> writes:
Neither of you have proposed any remedies for the situation.
they can't help themselves, they're Marxists, they never ever blame >>>>> the criminals or the "community", there'll always always be hundreds >>>>> of excuses why it's not the bad guys.
I rather doubt that there are any real Marxists in the US in 2023. It's truly a dumb, boring debate style. And repetitive.
errmm the BLM guys are admitted Marxists, they said so on their "About Us" page which was up there for all to see when the riots they provoked using that career criminal George Floyd kicked off, then they took it off when people started pointing
Cause."His campaign "crashed" because the other Democrat candidates ganged up and torpedoed him. He was doing pretty well until then. He still wouldn't have survived primaries in the South, but that's almost a badge of honor. This was Bernie's own "Lost
And Bernie fanboys torpedoed Warren. I still think she would have made
heck of a president.
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
You're shitting me, right?
He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
You're shitting me, right?
He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.
Gracchus kirjoitti 3.10.2023 klo 21.08:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
You're shitting me, right?
He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.Courtsie thinks lots of things are over the top...
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.You're shitting me, right?He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
On 10/3/23 11:08 AM, Gracchus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
You're shitting me, right?
He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot
I see each issue as separate. People do not need to have a broad orthodoxy.
Besides, he can answer me if he wants. Unless you guys have signed to be
his PR department.
On 10/3/23 11:08 AM, Gracchus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court
You're shitting me, right?He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.
I see each issue as separate. People do not need to have a broad orthodoxy.
Besides, he can answer me if he wants. Unless you guys have signed to be
his PR department.
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:52:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 10/3/23 11:08 AM, Gracchus wrote:And the rest of us can chime in if we feel inclined. That's what's great about having no moderator, right?! :)
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:I see each issue as separate. People do not need to have a broad orthodoxy. >> Besides, he can answer me if he wants. Unless you guys have signed to be
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot
You're shitting me, right?He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
his PR department.
Sawfish kirjoitti 3.10.2023 klo 21.52:
On 10/3/23 11:08 AM, Gracchus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even
You're shitting me, right?He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.
I see each issue as separate. People do not need to have a broad
orthodoxy.
Besides, he can answer me if he wants. Unless you guys have signed to
be his PR department.
I leave this to capable hands of my PR department. Otherwise there's
really no point paying them...
Gracchus kirjoitti 3.10.2023 klo 21.08:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
You're shitting me, right?
He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.Courtsie thinks lots of things are over the top...
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 19:40:18 UTC+1, TT wrote:
Gracchus kirjoitti 3.10.2023 klo 21.08:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:Courtsie thinks lots of things are over the top...
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
You're shitting me, right?
He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all
the time.
Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.
next you'll be supporting Johnny Depp <roll eyes>
On 10/3/23 11:58 AM, Gracchus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:52:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:I agree, and I'm just letting you know--and everyone--how little value I place on someone answering for another.
On 10/3/23 11:08 AM, Gracchus wrote:And the rest of us can chime in if we feel inclined. That's what's great about having no moderator, right?! :)
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:I see each issue as separate. People do not need to have a broad orthodoxy.
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot
You're shitting me, right?He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all >>>> the time.
Besides, he can answer me if he wants. Unless you guys have signed to be >> his PR department.
I mean, as you say, it's RST, but not all comments are of equal value.
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 19:40:18 UTC+1, TT wrote:
Gracchus kirjoitti 3.10.2023 klo 21.08:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
You're shitting me, right?
He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all >> the time.
Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.
Courtsie thinks lots of things are over the top...
next you'll be supporting Johnny Depp <roll eyes>
On 10/3/23 12:01 PM, TT wrote:
Sawfish kirjoitti 3.10.2023 klo 21.52:
On 10/3/23 11:08 AM, Gracchus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even
You're shitting me, right?He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all >>>> the time.
Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.
I see each issue as separate. People do not need to have a broad
orthodoxy.
Besides, he can answer me if he wants. Unless you guys have signed to
be his PR department.
I leave this to capable hands of my PR department. Otherwise there's really no point paying them...Surely you can do better...e.g. I'm available... ;^)
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 20:12:26 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:enthusiasm for her. The article also highlights that she is a knowledgeable, well-prepared, reasonable, experienced, even-tempered, hardworking candidate. The Guardian also notes that she would be the youngest woman ever to be president of the United
On 10/3/23 12:01 PM, TT wrote:
Sawfish kirjoitti 3.10.2023 klo 21.52:Surely you can do better...e.g. I'm available... ;^)
On 10/3/23 11:08 AM, Gracchus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote: >>>>>> Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. EvenYou're shitting me, right?He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all >>>>>> the time.
Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lot.
I see each issue as separate. People do not need to have a broad
orthodoxy.
Besides, he can answer me if he wants. Unless you guys have signed to
be his PR department.
I leave this to capable hands of my PR department. Otherwise there's
really no point paying them...
this just in from TT's PR department :
Q. please tell us why Hillary Clinton is absoultely wonderful
Here's some factual information about Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. According to the Atlantic, millions of Americans, women and men, love her intelligence, her industriousness, and her grit; they feel loyal to her, they will vote with
Thanks TT's PR team!
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 12:11:13 PM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:I would feel the same if a bunch of us had congregated in a physical room to discuss tennis and drifted to other topics.
On 10/3/23 11:58 AM, Gracchus wrote:That's fine, but since it is an open forum, our comments are put out there for the original speaker, the questioner, and other members of RST. So they can be heeded, rejected, protested or simply ignored. It doesn't matter to me which anyone chooses.
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:52:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:I agree, and I'm just letting you know--and everyone--how little value I
On 10/3/23 11:08 AM, Gracchus wrote:And the rest of us can chime in if we feel inclined. That's what's great about having no moderator, right?! :)
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 11:02:34 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote: >>>>>> Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:I see each issue as separate. People do not need to have a broad orthodoxy.
Yep. And about her ever-so "sensible" positions in debates. Even Court 1 thinks he is over-the-top crazy on Hillary. That says a lotYou're shitting me, right?He's not. He also was a huge Hillary fan, talked about her resume all >>>>>> the time.
Besides, he can answer me if he wants. Unless you guys have signed to be >>>> his PR department.
place on someone answering for another.
I mean, as you say, it's RST, but not all comments are of equal value.
When I used IRC back in the day, it was similar, but took place in real-time. That format had the advantage of the ability to launch private side-chats with any fellow member of a "channel." You could talk that way without anyone throwing their twocents in. Here we can't do that. There are times the clamor can get annoying during give-and-take with one person. But not a huge deal IMO.
That's fine, but since it is an open forum, our comments are put out
there for the original speaker, the questioner, and other members of
RST. So they can be heeded, rejected, protested or simply ignored. It
doesn't matter to me which anyone chooses. I would feel the same if a
bunch of us had congregated in a physical room to discuss tennis and
drifted to other topics.
When I used IRC back in the day, it was similar, but took place in
real-time. That format had the advantage of the ability to launch
private side-chats with any fellow member of a "channel." You could
talk that way without anyone throwing their two cents in. Here we
can't do that. There are times the clamor can get annoying during give-and-take with one person. But not a huge deal IMO.
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com> writes:>>> That's fine, but since it is an open forum, our comments are put out> there for the original speaker, the questioner, and other members of> RST. So they can be heeded, rejected, protested or simply ignored. It>doesn't matter to me which anyone chooses. I would feel the same if a> bunch of us had congregated in a physical room to discuss tennis and> drifted to other topics.>> When I used IRC back in the day, it was similar, but took place in> real-time. That
Gracchus <grac...@gmail.com> writes:
That's fine, but since it is an open forum, our comments are put out
there for the original speaker, the questioner, and other members of
RST. So they can be heeded, rejected, protested or simply ignored. It doesn't matter to me which anyone chooses. I would feel the same if a
bunch of us had congregated in a physical room to discuss tennis and drifted to other topics.
When I used IRC back in the day, it was similar, but took place in real-time. That format had the advantage of the ability to launchHe's talking nonsense. He tolerates it all day long from Icey, who
private side-chats with any fellow member of a "channel." You could
talk that way without anyone throwing their two cents in. Here we
can't do that. There are times the clamor can get annoying during give-and-take with one person. But not a huge deal IMO.
seems to do it out of malice and hatred... whereas I was merely
recalling a fun and funny time from rst history while barbing TT in
typical fashion.
jdeluise <jdel...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rdoesn't matter to me which anyone chooses. I would feel the same if a> bunch of us had congregated in a physical room to discuss tennis and> drifted to other topics.>> When I used IRC back in the day, it was similar, but took place in> real-time. That
Gracchus <grac...@gmail.com> writes:>>> That's fine, but since it is an open forum, our comments are put out> there for the original speaker, the questioner, and other members of> RST. So they can be heeded, rejected, protested or simply ignored. It>
Yeah yeah.
What do you do now?
Badmouthing icey and praising yourself for the same/similar stuff you do.
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
is an open forum, our comments are put out> there for the original
heeded, rejected, protested or simply ignored. It> doesn't matter to
me which anyone chooses. I would feel the same if a> bunch of us had congregated in a physical room to discuss tennis and> drifted to other topics.>> When I used IRC back in the day, it was similar, but took
place in> real-time. That format had the advantage of the ability to
launch> private side-chats with any fellow member of a "channel." You
could> talk that way without anyone throwing their two cents in. Here
can't do that. There are times the clamor can get annoying during>give-and-take with one person. But not a huge deal IMO.He's talking
nonsense. He tolerates it all day long from Icey, whoseems to do it
out of malice and hatred... whereas I was merelyrecalling a fun and
funny time from rst history while barbing TT intypical fashion.
Yeah yeah.
What do you do now?
Badmouthing icey and praising yourself for the same/similar stuff you
do.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> writes:> jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r> is an open forum, our comments are put out> there for the original> heeded, rejected, protested or simply ignored. It> doesn't matter to> me which anyonechooses. I would feel the same if a> bunch of us had> congregated in a physical room to discuss tennis and> drifted to other> topics.>> When I used IRC back in the day, it was similar, but took> place in> real-time. That format had the advantage of the
https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 1.10.2023 klo 1.06:
https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E
Only in Finland:
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1710073848597754149?s=20
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 1.10.2023 klo 1.06:
https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E
Only in Finland:
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1710073848597754149?s=20
On 10/6/23 3:14 AM, TT wrote:
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 1.10.2023 klo 1.06:
https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8E
Only in Finland:
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1710073848597754149?s=20
TT, if you want to know what's wrong with American society in a
nutshell, it's that the people like the cashier, representing authority,
are more afraid of the law than the criminals are. She'd need to be concerned about whether she'd be sued, fired, and charged with battery. Since you can easily find her at the shop, or at home, the police or
process servers can find her. This is much less likely for the criminals.
Very simple.
On Friday, 6 October 2023 at 15:36:03 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 10/6/23 3:14 AM, TT wrote:in other words it's because the police are so lazy and the lawyer scumbags always back the criminal for $$$.
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 1.10.2023 klo 1.06:TT, if you want to know what's wrong with American society in a
https://youtube.com/shorts/dI1bJmqsz8EOnly in Finland:
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1710073848597754149?s=20
nutshell, it's that the people like the cashier, representing authority,
are more afraid of the law than the criminals are. She'd need to be
concerned about whether she'd be sued, fired, and charged with battery.
Since you can easily find her at the shop, or at home, the police or
process servers can find her. This is much less likely for the criminals.
Very simple.
You might like this, just this week some right-wing guy called Laurence Fox on X said he was all for dismantling Mayor Khan's traffic cameras, this of course is far worse than burglarly or car theft which the police have officially said they don'tcare about anymore + they refuse to arrest woke green protestors, but they sent 6 (yes SIX) officers round his house to search the whole place and then arrested him! what a wonderful system where muggers, burglars, car and bike thieves have free reign
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 124:09:53 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,761 |
