In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.Djokovic.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to lose the Grand Slam title race with
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.”said the Mallorcan.
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll send it but I haven’t done it yet,
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:Djokovic.
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to lose the Grand Slam title race with
said the Mallorcan.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.”
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll send it but I haven’t done it yet,
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs "Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:Djokovic.
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to lose the Grand Slam title race with
yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.”
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll send it but I haven’t done it
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs "Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:Djokovic.
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to lose the Grand Slam title race with
yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.”
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll send it but I haven’t done it
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs "Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects.
So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about
Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the
records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I >>> have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal
explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to
lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak
lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater
frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.”
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of >>> pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience
I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll >>> send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when
he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many
friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every
now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he
actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe
he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore
that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:> On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:>> On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:>>> In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about >>> Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggestthe >>> records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.>>>>>> “I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I >>> have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal >>> explained to Juanma Castano when
Djok would of been more sore than I" vs >> "Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore >> that I am". The eternal debate 🤔>>> > "Djok would of been more sore than me" even.Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know.Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he >>> actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!>>>>>> "Boo hoo hoo!">>>>>>> Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe >> he will.>>>> The ofs and the of-nots. "
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 1:38:14 PM UTC-4, grif wrote:Djokovic.
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to lose the Grand Slam title race with
yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.”
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll send it but I haven’t done it
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs "Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
They all pushed each other to extreme limits, and I believe if we had only one of them in the last 20 years, we wouldn't have seen the craziness we witnessed, these three winning 65+ slams. That player would have retired much earlier.
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about
Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the
records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I
have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal
explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to >>> lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak >>> lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater >>> frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.” >>>
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of >>> pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience
I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll >>> send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when >>> he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many >>> friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every
now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he
actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe
he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore
that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the
conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects.
So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-4, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness.
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about
Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the
records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I >>>>> have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal
explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to >>>>> lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak >>>>> lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater >>>>> frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.” >>>>>
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of >>>>> pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience >>>>> I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll >>>>> send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when >>>>> he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many >>>>> friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every >>>>> now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he
actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe >>>> he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore >>>> that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct
word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the
conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of >> soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects.
So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
This was pointed out long back but Pelle continues to favor that "of" usage. Whisper likes to use the word "cower" instead of the word "cowed" (pointed out by Gracchus).
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-4, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness.
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about
Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the
records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I >>>>> have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal
explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to >>>>> lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak >>>>> lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater >>>>> frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.” >>>>>
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of >>>>> pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience >>>>> I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll >>>>> send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when >>>>> he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many >>>>> friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every >>>>> now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he
actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe >>>> he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore >>>> that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct
word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the
conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of >> soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects.
So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
This was pointed out long back but Pelle continues to favor that "of" usage. Whisper likes to use the word "cower" instead of the word "cowed" (pointed out by Gracchus).
On 19/09/2023 21:20, RaspingDrive wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-4, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness.
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about >>>>>> Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the
records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I
have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal
explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to >>>>>> lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak >>>>>> lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater >>>>>> frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.” >>>>>>
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of >>>>>> pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience >>>>>> I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll >>>>>> send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when >>>>>> he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many >>>>>> friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every >>>>>> now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he
actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe >>>>> he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore >>>>> that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct >>> word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the
conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of >>> soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects. >>> So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
This was pointed out long back but Pelle continues to favor that "of"
usage. Whisper likes to use the word "cower" instead of the word
"cowed" (pointed out by Gracchus).
Yes, everyone should know this by now. But what was more interesting to
me was the use of "than". It depends if you use it as a conjunction or a preposition.
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 23.25:
On 19/09/2023 21:20, RaspingDrive wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-4, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness. >>>>
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about >>>>>>> Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the >>>>>>> records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my
possibilities, I
have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal >>>>>>> explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was
disappointed to
lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, >>>>>>> Novak
lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a
greater
frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.” >>>>>>>
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of
pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience >>>>>>> I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll
send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when >>>>>>> he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many >>>>>>> friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every >>>>>>> now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he >>>>>>> actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back.
Maybe
he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more
sore
that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct >>>> word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the
conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of >>>> soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects. >>>> So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
This was pointed out long back but Pelle continues to favor that "of"
usage. Whisper likes to use the word "cower" instead of the word
"cowed" (pointed out by Gracchus).
Yes, everyone should know this by now. But what was more interesting
to me was the use of "than". It depends if you use it as a conjunction
or a preposition.
Examples?
On 19.9.2023 23.30, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 23.25:
Examples?These have already been up. Example: "Djok would of been more sore than I".
Conjunction: "Djok would of been more sore than I am"
Proposition: "Djok would of been more sore than me".
Subject v object.
The "Djok of have been more sore that me" flew past the cuckoo in the bend.
The Finnish language does not have, or at least to my knowledge does not have prepositions. It uses mostly postsuffixes. But I'm from Zansibar.
--
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 23.25:
On 19/09/2023 21:20, RaspingDrive wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-4, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness. >>>>
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about >>>>>>> Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the >>>>>>> records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I
have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal >>>>>>> explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to >>>>>>> lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak >>>>>>> lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater >>>>>>> frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.” >>>>>>>
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of
pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience >>>>>>> I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll
send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when >>>>>>> he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many >>>>>>> friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every >>>>>>> now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he >>>>>>> actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe >>>>>> he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore >>>>>> that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct >>>> word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the
conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of >>>> soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects. >>>> So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
This was pointed out long back but Pelle continues to favor that "of" usage. Whisper likes to use the word "cower" instead of the word "cowed" (pointed out by Gracchus).
Yes, everyone should know this by now. But what was more interesting to me was the use of "than". It depends if you use it as a conjunction or a preposition.
Examples?
Djok would of been more sore than I
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 4:58:11 PM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
On 19.9.2023 23.30, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 23.25:
Examples?These have already been up. Example: "Djok would of been more sore than I".
Conjunction: "Djok would of been more sore than I am"
Proposition: "Djok would of been more sore than me".
Subject v object.
The "Djok of have been more sore that me" flew past the cuckoo in the bend.
The Finnish language does not have, or at least to my knowledge does not have prepositions. It uses mostly postsuffixes. But I'm from Zansibar."would of" looks strange to me. Never heard of that usage before.
--
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about
Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the
records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I
have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal
explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to >>> lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak >>> lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater >>> frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.” >>>
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of >>> pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience
I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll >>> send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when >>> he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many >>> friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every
now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he
actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe
he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore
that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the
conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects.
So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
On 19.9.2023 23.30, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 23.25:
On 19/09/2023 21:20, RaspingDrive wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:30:03 PM UTC-4, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness. >>>>
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about >>>>>>> Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the >>>>>>> records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my
possibilities, I
have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal >>>>>>> explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was
disappointed to
lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, >>>>>>> Novak
lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a >>>>>>> greater
frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.”
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of
pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience >>>>>>> I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll
send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when
he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many
friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every >>>>>>> now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he >>>>>>> actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. >>>>>> Maybe
he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs >>>>>> "Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more >>>>>> sore
that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct
word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the
conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of
soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects.
So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
This was pointed out long back but Pelle continues to favor that "of" >>> usage. Whisper likes to use the word "cower" instead of the word
"cowed" (pointed out by Gracchus).
Yes, everyone should know this by now. But what was more interesting
to me was the use of "than". It depends if you use it as a conjunction
or a preposition.
Examples?These have already been up. Example: "Djok would of been more sore than I".
Conjunction: "Djok would of been more sore than I am"
Proposition: "Djok would of been more sore than me".
Subject v object.
The "Djok of have been more sore that me" flew past the cuckoo in the bend.
The Finnish language does not have, or at least to my knowledge does not have prepositions. It uses mostly postsuffixes. But I'm from Zansibar.
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 23:21:23 UTC+1, RaspingDrive wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 4:58:11 PM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
On 19.9.2023 23.30, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 23.25:
Examples?These have already been up. Example: "Djok would of been more sore than I".
Conjunction: "Djok would of been more sore than I am"
Proposition: "Djok would of been more sore than me".
Subject v object.
The "Djok of have been more sore that me" flew past the cuckoo in the bend.
it's a common grammatical mistake by people who went to school in England, it's cos "should of" is how "should've" sounds when you say it over here.The Finnish language does not have, or at least to my knowledge does not have prepositions. It uses mostly postsuffixes. But I'm from Zansibar. --"would of" looks strange to me. Never heard of that usage before.
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 20:30:03 UTC+1, TT wrote:
grif kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 20.38:
On 19/09/2023 18:25, grif wrote:
On 19/09/2023 14:26, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
In a major interview with Movistar+ in Spain, Nadal was asked about >>> Djokovic’s Grand Slam dominance and he appeared to suggest the
records mean more to the world No 1 than they do to him.
“I am not frustrated for a simple reason – within my possibilities, I
have done everything to make things as good as possible,” Nadal
explained to Juanma Castano when asked whether he was disappointed to >>> lose the Grand Slam title race with Djokovic.
“Yes, you can live frustrated with 22 Grand Slams, for example, Novak
lives it in a more intense way. For him, it would have been a greater >>> frustration not to achieve it. Perhaps that is why he achieved it.” >>>
https://www.tennis365.com/tennis-news/rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic-grand-slam-record-goat
Okie dokie. Yet, from the same interview:
“The truth is that I haven’t sent any message to Djokovic yet out of
pure ignorance. When you win something so important, from experience >>> I know it’s better to take the time to appreciate that message. I’ll
send it but I haven’t done it yet,” said the Mallorcan.
“Of course, I sent messages to [Carlos] Alcaraz when he won or when >>> he was about to win. The others – on the circuit I don’t have many >>> friends left, I’m from another generation. I talk to Federer every >>> now and then,” revealed Nadal.
Alcatraz gets a grats when he was about to win. Djok not, when he
actually did win. The 24th! Humbelina!
"Boo hoo hoo!"
Maybe he hopes Carlos will bend over for him when he comes back. Maybe >> he will.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore >> that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness.
As for English, I think you're wrong... and Bard agrees with me:
-
The correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.
The word “of” in the phrases you mentioned is incorrect. The correct word to use is “have”.
Here’s a breakdown of the correct phrase:
“would have been”: This is the correct form of the verb “to be” in the
conditional past tense.
“more sore than”: This is a comparison between two people’s level of soreness.
“I”: This is the correct pronoun to use when comparing two subjects. So, the correct phrase is “would have been more sore than I”.this "should of" thing is what gave away Pelle as being from England a while ago, it surprising considering he went to school in the USA for a bit too and is such an obvious academic.
The ofs and the of-nots. "Djok would of been more sore than I" vs
"Djok of have been more sore that me" vs "Djok would of been more sore
that I am". The eternal debate 🤔
"Djok would of been more sore than me" even.
Djok wants it more. He's quite mad you know. Borderline mental illness.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 1:38:14 PM UTC-4, grif wrote:
They all pushed each other to extreme limits, and I believe if we had only one of them in the last 20 years, we wouldn't have seen the craziness we witnessed, these three winning 65+ slams. That >player would have retired much earlier.
On 20/09/2023 4:17 am, PeteWasLucky wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 1:38:14 PM UTC-4, grif wrote:
They all pushed each other to extreme limits, and I believe if we had only one of them in the last 20 years, we wouldn't have seen the craziness we witnessed, these three winning 65+ slams. That >player would have retired much earlier.
Sampras would have played on for 5 more yrs if he knew these 3 were
coming. It's very hard to get motivated when you're on top of the mountain.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 107:19:40 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,482 |