https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.Andrew Anglinhttps://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/Very good article, very good. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:rhtmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.Andrew Anglinhttps://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/Very good article, very good. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.
Of course not all women are like her.
On 19.9.2023 6.34, PeteWasLucky wrote:htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.Andrew Anglinhttps://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/Very good article, very good. -- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
*skriptis <skri...@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.
Of course not all women are like her.But all two-faced, alt-facting alt-righters are.
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
You should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
You should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These female
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Mostwomen who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding with
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjust read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
You should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These female
A woman has offered interesting conversation, orwomen who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding with
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjust read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
You should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding with
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most
I skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basicYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
observations about the differences in the traditional roles of
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as
true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women areFunny, Saw.
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:
they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjust read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
You should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding withA woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most
I skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic observations about the differences in the traditional roles of
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as
true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women are
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:
they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:> On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:>>> On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>>>> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html>>>>>>>> You
that men do. That they are therefore>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.>>>> Does it work like that?> Funny, Saw.>> There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for notbasically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:>> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try>> on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit>> some/all of the same motivations
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjust read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
You should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding with
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most
I skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basicYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
observations about the differences in the traditional roles of
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to >> gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as
true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women areFunny, Saw.
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: >> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try >> on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort of
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but
it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to
test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility (male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean
that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now
being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:02:24 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:> On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: > >> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote: > >>> OnTuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: > >>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > >>>>> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup
bmoore <bmoore@nyx.net> Wrote in message:r> On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:02:24 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:> On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: > >> On 9/19/23 3:09AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: > >>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > >>>>> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rwaleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>>>> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html>>>>>>>> You
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:> On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:>>> On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:>>>> PeteWasLucky <
that men do. That they are therefore>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.>>>> Does it work like that?> Funny, Saw.>> There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for notbasically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:>> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try>> on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit>> some/all of the same motivations
No as lesbisns are also women. And the worst kind of, rebbeling against natural order, male authority and so on.
They're not a positive exception, rather horrendous radicals.
The few exceptions you are looking are highly pious women, who believe in God, who respect traditional society and that equates to women who are submissive to male order.
E.g. Queen Elisabeth II was ok, because she spent her life trying to be worthy successor to her dad and fullfil her duties in and old system.
But as author said, they all work to undermine things one way or another.
Remember during her reign, male primogeniture was abolished. So you'll get a lot more queens there from now on.
So author is 100% right.
There's a reason why Jesus had 12 men as his disciples. Men are meant to govern.
If he had women there as equals, nothing would be done, no ideas would be discussed, nothing would be taught or learnt, spread, all you'd get is sex, quarrels and gossips.
bmoore <bmo...@nyx.net> Wrote in message:rTuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: > >>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > >>>>> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:02:24 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:> On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: > >> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote: > >>> On
https://youtube.com/shorts/o5HeUt6SXys?si=-en6-Tgau0SWkHdM
That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort of
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more
feminized simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in
the general society.
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort of
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit
farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more
feminized simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in
the general society.
Have women become more or less "feminine", in your estimation?
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjust read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
You should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding with
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most
I skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic
observations about the differences in the traditional roles of
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as
true in every case in an absolute sense.
Yes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women are
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:
they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
Funny, Saw.
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
rec.sport.tennis kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 19.47:> On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:>>> On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>>>> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html>>>>>>>>>>>>
What do you mean by feminization of men? Honest question.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:02:24 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjust read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding with
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most
exception.OK. But I think responsibility is a human asset, not just a male one. My mother went back to school after we kids got old enough, and her resulting paycheck basically put me through college, minus a few student loans. And I don't think my mother was anThat's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basicYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
observations about the differences in the traditional roles of
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to >>>> gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as >>>> true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women areFunny, Saw.
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: >>>> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try >>>> on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit
farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized
simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general
society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but
it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to
test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming
feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility
(male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean
that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now
being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
What do you mean by feminization of men? Honest question.
jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 21.37:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort of
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit
farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more
feminized simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in
the general society.
Have women become more or less "feminine", in your estimation?
Depends on era of comparison.
Can you dig it?
On 9/19/23 12:32 PM, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 21.37:
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort of
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit
farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more
feminized simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in
the general society.
Have women become more or less "feminine", in your estimation?
Depends on era of comparison.
There is a funny thing going on, at least to my perception, and in urban western US settings.
It appears to me that young men (up to mid 30s, anyway) are much less willing to risk approaching females who they find attractive, and this
causes a dearth of male attention. In response, young hetero0minded
females are dressing and acting more provocatively, in a dolorous
attempt to get male attention. This is not working due to two factors:
1) feminization of young males (watch any TV commercial to spot metrosexuals...)
2) fear of being accused of improper behavior
It produces a sort of woeful neurosis in both young urban sexes at this
time.
Sawfish kirjoitti 20.9.2023 klo 0.04:
On 9/19/23 12:32 PM, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 21.37:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort of
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit >>>> farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more
feminized simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in >>>> the general society.
Have women become more or less "feminine", in your estimation?
Depends on era of comparison.
There is a funny thing going on, at least to my perception, and in urban western US settings.
It appears to me that young men (up to mid 30s, anyway) are much less willing to risk approaching females who they find attractive, and this causes a dearth of male attention. In response, young hetero0minded females are dressing and acting more provocatively, in a dolorous
attempt to get male attention. This is not working due to two factors:
1) feminization of young males (watch any TV commercial to spot metrosexuals...)
2) fear of being accused of improper behavior
It produces a sort of woeful neurosis in both young urban sexes at this time.
That's probably true. At least there are studies which say that men
*are* afraid of being accused of harassment when trying to hit a girl.
On 9/19/23 10:29 AM, bmoore wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:02:24 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: >>>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this. >>>>>>
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
Most women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions.
an exception.OK. But I think responsibility is a human asset, not just a male one. My mother went back to school after we kids got old enough, and her resulting paycheck basically put me through college, minus a few student loans. And I don't think my mother wasThat's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic >>>> observations about the differences in the traditional roles ofYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as >>>> true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women areFunny, Saw.
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: >>>> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore >>>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit
farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized >> simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general
society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but
it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to
test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming
feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility >> (male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean
that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now
being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
Yes, that's been my experience, too. There are responsible *people* and irresponsible *people*.
However, traditional patriarchal social organization tend to be self-policing, self-condemning. The patriarchal group strongly
criticizes lack of honor and shirking of responsibility, but does not
expect the same *level* of conformity to these high standards for
females, for the most part.
If this is accurate, can we say that female hierarchy in this same patriarchal society puts a corresponding amounts of pressure on wayward females as is placed upon wayward males by the patriarchal hierarchy? I think not...
This is not to say that there is *no* pressure or stigma attached to
female shortcomings, but until fairly recently, there was no greater
failure for a married man with children than to not provide for them,
and to not protect the household, or for that matter, the nation, from existential threat.
No one expected this from females; they were perceived as the
comforters, the gentle ones. You can allow them to cry, to show
weakness, but not for men.
What do you mean by feminization of men? Honest question.In general, b, I'd say that the migration away from punishment for
*clear* transgressions--a paternal stance, traditionally--toward an
external remediation supplied by a comforting, sympathetic entity--which
had formerly been a maternal approach--is one sign of a feminization of society as a whole.
As to individual men, the perception of the "metrosexual" male is what
I'm talking about. A partner rather than a leader in a domestic relationship, or worse, a cooperative sycophant.
OK, this was rhetorically loaded (for effect...), but I do perceive a general retreat from decisive masculine values towards more of a sharing
and caring response to almost any situation, potentially threatening or otherwise.
I am viewed as scary and abrupt by some of my daughter's peers. Yet my
wife does not share this; she says that I fill in the assertiveness that
she would otherwise be unable to call into play in various instances
when we have conflict with other interests.
I do not particularly like doing this, but it is in my DNA that *I* will
be the one to do it as a part of my definitive responsibilities. Just
like planning our estate, etc. She will contribute nuances, but it's up
to me to form the main plan and get it rolling. We are both comfortable
with this, as it reflects the households in which we grew up.We've both
seen multiple examples of it working very well, and now we are one.
Can you dig it?
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjust read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
You should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding withA woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most
I skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic observations about the differences in the traditional roles ofYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women are basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?Funny, Saw.
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjust read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
You should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding with
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most
I skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basicYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
observations about the differences in the traditional roles of
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to >> gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as
true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women areFunny, Saw.
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: >> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try >> on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort of
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but
it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to
test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility (male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean
that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now
being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rwaleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>>>> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html>>>>>>>> You
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:> On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:>>> On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:>>>> PeteWasLucky <
that men do. That they are therefore>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.>>>> Does it work like that?> Funny, Saw.>> There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for notbasically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:>> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try>> on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit>> some/all of the same motivations
No as lesbisns are also women. And the worst kind of, rebbeling against natural order, male authority and so on.
They're not a positive exception, rather horrendous radicals.
The few exceptions you are looking are highly pious women, who believe in God, who respect traditional society and that equates to women who are submissive to male order.
E.g. Queen Elisabeth II was ok, because she spent her life trying to be worthy successor to her dad and fullfil her duties in and old system.
But as author said, they all work to undermine things one way or another.
Remember during her reign, male primogeniture was abolished. So you'll get a lot more queens there from now on.
So author is 100% right.
There's a reason why Jesus had 12 men as his disciples. Men are meant to govern.
If he had women there as equals, nothing would be done, no ideas would be discussed, nothing would be taught or learnt, spread, all you'd get is sex, quarrels and gossips.
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
Can you dig it?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SnjrcAx9lDQ&t=48s
On 9/19/23 10:29 AM, bmoore wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:02:24 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: >>>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this. >>>>>>
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
Most women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions.
an exception.OK. But I think responsibility is a human asset, not just a male one. My mother went back to school after we kids got old enough, and her resulting paycheck basically put me through college, minus a few student loans. And I don't think my mother wasThat's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic >>>> observations about the differences in the traditional roles ofYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as >>>> true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women areFunny, Saw.
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: >>>> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore >>>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit
farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized >> simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general
society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but
it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to
test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming
feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility >> (male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean
that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now
being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
Yes, that's been my experience, too. There are responsible *people* and irresponsible *people*.
However, traditional patriarchal social organization tend to be self-policing, self-condemning. The patriarchal group strongly
criticizes lack of honor and shirking of responsibility, but does not
expect the same *level* of conformity to these high standards for
females, for the most part.
If this is accurate, can we say that female hierarchy in this same patriarchal society puts a corresponding amounts of pressure on wayward females as is placed upon wayward males by the patriarchal hierarchy? I think not...
This is not to say that there is *no* pressure or stigma attached to
female shortcomings, but until fairly recently, there was no greater
failure for a married man with children than to not provide for them,
and to not protect the household, or for that matter, the nation, from existential threat.
No one expected this from females; they were perceived as the
comforters, the gentle ones. You can allow them to cry, to show
weakness, but not for men.
What do you mean by feminization of men? Honest question.In general, b, I'd say that the migration away from punishment for
*clear* transgressions--a paternal stance, traditionally--toward an
external remediation supplied by a comforting, sympathetic entity--which
had formerly been a maternal approach--is one sign of a feminization of society as a whole.
As to individual men, the perception of the "metrosexual" male is what
I'm talking about. A partner rather than a leader in a domestic relationship, or worse, a cooperative sycophant.
OK, this was rhetorically loaded (for effect...), but I do perceive a general retreat from decisive masculine values towards more of a sharing
and caring response to almost any situation, potentially threatening or otherwise.
I am viewed as scary and abrupt by some of my daughter's peers. Yet my
wife does not share this; she says that I fill in the assertiveness that
she would otherwise be unable to call into play in various instances
when we have conflict with other interests.
I do not particularly like doing this, but it is in my DNA that *I* will
be the one to do it as a part of my definitive responsibilities. Just
like planning our estate, etc. She will contribute nuances, but it's up
to me to form the main plan and get it rolling. We are both comfortable
with this, as it reflects the households in which we grew up.We've both
seen multiple examples of it working very well, and now we are one.
Can you dig it?
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 5:22:35 PM UTC-4, TT wrote:
Sawfish kirjoitti 20.9.2023 klo 0.04:
On 9/19/23 12:32 PM, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 19.9.2023 klo 21.37:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort of
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit >>>> farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more
feminized simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in >>>> the general society.
Have women become more or less "feminine", in your estimation?
Depends on era of comparison.
There is a funny thing going on, at least to my perception, and in urban western US settings.
It appears to me that young men (up to mid 30s, anyway) are much less willing to risk approaching females who they find attractive, and this causes a dearth of male attention. In response, young hetero0minded females are dressing and acting more provocatively, in a dolorous attempt to get male attention. This is not working due to two factors:
1) feminization of young males (watch any TV commercial to spot metrosexuals...)
2) fear of being accused of improper behavior
It produces a sort of woeful neurosis in both young urban sexes at this time.
That's probably true. At least there are studies which say that menTrue, girls are the ones that initiate the connection now.
*are* afraid of being accused of harassment when trying to hit a girl.
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 18:02:24 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rjust read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.
https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this.
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding with
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions. Most
and as honor etc. is male they would prob go totally against that.disagree as no sign/evidence of any of this from lesbians, sure Anglin would say they are regular women and no different at all really, in fact they are possibly even more disloyal as they generally hate men(they think they've been oppressed by men etc)That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basicYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
observations about the differences in the traditional roles of
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to >>>> gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as >>>> true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women areFunny, Saw.
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: >>>> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try >>>> on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit
farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized
simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general
society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but
it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to
test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming
feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility
(male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean
that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now
being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 9:57:18 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On 9/20/23 9:26 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 18:02:24 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: >>>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this. >>>>>>
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
Most women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions.
etc) and as honor etc. is male they would prob go totally against that.disagree as no sign/evidence of any of this from lesbians, sure Anglin would say they are regular women and no different at all really, in fact they are possibly even more disloyal as they generally hate men(they think they've been oppressed by menThat's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic >>>> observations about the differences in the traditional roles ofYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as
true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women are >>>> basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:Funny, Saw.
they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore >>>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit >> farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized >> simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general >> society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but >> it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to >> test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming
feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility
(male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean >> that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now >> being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
Yes.
On thinking about it a little after I wrote that, I saw male-assertive lesbians as cynical caricatures of males. These lesbians really only do the surface masculine stuff, and not the deep commitments to protection and guidance that traditionalist straight men do.
And like many homosexuals, they are narcissistic, putting on a public show. So it's an act, really.Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.
On 9/20/23 9:26 AM, The Iceberg wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 18:02:24 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: >>>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this. >>>>>>
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
Most women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions.
etc) and as honor etc. is male they would prob go totally against that.disagree as no sign/evidence of any of this from lesbians, sure Anglin would say they are regular women and no different at all really, in fact they are possibly even more disloyal as they generally hate men(they think they've been oppressed by menThat's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic >>>> observations about the differences in the traditional roles ofYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as >>>> true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women areFunny, Saw.
basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: >>>> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore >>>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit
farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized >> simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general
society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but
it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to
test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming
feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility >> (male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean
that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now
being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
Yes.
On thinking about it a little after I wrote that, I saw male-assertive lesbians as cynical caricatures of males. These lesbians really only do
the surface masculine stuff, and not the deep commitments to protection
and guidance that traditionalist straight men do.
And like many homosexuals, they are narcissistic, putting on a public
show. So it's an act, really.
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 9:57:18 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On 9/20/23 9:26 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 18:02:24 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: >>>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this. >>>>>>
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
Most women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions.
etc) and as honor etc. is male they would prob go totally against that.disagree as no sign/evidence of any of this from lesbians, sure Anglin would say they are regular women and no different at all really, in fact they are possibly even more disloyal as they generally hate men(they think they've been oppressed by menThat's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic >>>> observations about the differences in the traditional roles ofYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as
true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women are >>>> basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:Funny, Saw.
they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit
some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore >>>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit >> farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized >> simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general >> society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but >> it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to >> test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming
feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility
(male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean >> that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now >> being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
Yes.
On thinking about it a little after I wrote that, I saw male-assertive lesbians as cynical caricatures of males. These lesbians really only do the surface masculine stuff, and not the deep commitments to protection and guidance that traditionalist straight men do.
And like many homosexuals, they are narcissistic, putting on a public show. So it's an act, really.Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.
On Wednesday, 20 September 2023 at 19:36:04 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 9:57:18 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/20/23 9:26 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 18:02:24 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: >>>>>>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this. >>>>>>>>>
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media. These
Most women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions.
etc) and as honor etc. is male they would prob go totally against that.disagree as no sign/evidence of any of this from lesbians, sure Anglin would say they are regular women and no different at all really, in fact they are possibly even more disloyal as they generally hate men(they think they've been oppressed by menThat's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic >>>>>>> observations about the differences in the traditional roles ofYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as >>>>>>> true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women are >>>>>>> basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: >>>>>>> they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's tryFunny, Saw.
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit >>>>>>> some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore >>>>>>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit >>>>> farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized >>>>> simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general >>>>> society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but >>>>> it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to >>>>> test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming
feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility >>>>> (male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean >>>>> that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now >>>>> being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
Yes.Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.
On thinking about it a little after I wrote that, I saw male-assertive
lesbians as cynical caricatures of males. These lesbians really only do
the surface masculine stuff, and not the deep commitments to protection
and guidance that traditionalist straight men do.
And like many homosexuals, they are narcissistic, putting on a public
show. So it's an act, really.
don't you call everyone who disagrees with your sick Marxism a "narcissist", from Trump to Anglin to Djoker they're all narcissists, according to you, yes? you don't really know what the word means, do you.
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 2:36:04 PM UTC-4, bmoore wrote:These female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 9:57:18 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/20/23 9:26 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 18:02:24 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: >>>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this. >>>>>>
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media.
Most women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions.
men etc) and as honor etc. is male they would prob go totally against that.disagree as no sign/evidence of any of this from lesbians, sure Anglin would say they are regular women and no different at all really, in fact they are possibly even more disloyal as they generally hate men(they think they've been oppressed byThat's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic >>>> observations about the differences in the traditional roles ofYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences to
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as
true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women are >>>> basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:Funny, Saw.
they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit >>>> some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit >> farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized
simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general
society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but
it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to >> test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming >> feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility
(male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean
that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now >> being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
Yes.
On thinking about it a little after I wrote that, I saw male-assertive lesbians as cynical caricatures of males. These lesbians really only do the surface masculine stuff, and not the deep commitments to protection and guidance that traditionalist straight men do.
Hung up on US politics, right wing trash! Tennis pro ?And like many homosexuals, they are narcissistic, putting on a public show. So it's an act, really.Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 18:29:10 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:> Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > > On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:> On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:>> On 9/19/23 3:09AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:>>> On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>>>>> https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really
plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?That's all well and good, but the the authoron the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit>> some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore>> just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.>>>> Does it work like that?> Funny, Saw.>> There are
worthy successor to her dad and fullfil her duties in and old system. > > But as author said, they all work to undermine things one way or another. > > Remember during her reign, male primogeniture was abolished. So you'll get a lot more queens thereThe few exceptions you are looking are highly pious women, who believe in God, who respect traditional society and that equates to women who are submissive to male order. > > E.g. Queen Elisabeth II was ok, because she spent her life trying to be
On Wednesday, 20 September 2023 at 20:05:20 UTC+1, gap...@gmail.com wrote:> On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 2:36:04PM UTC-4, bmoore wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 9:57:18AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: > > > On 9/20/23 9:26 AM, TheIceberg wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 18:02:24 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote: > > > >> On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote: > > > >>> On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: > > > >>>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccuratehttps://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/ > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Very good article, very good. > > > >>>>>
Actions speak louder than words. > > > >>> > > > >>>> But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women are > > > >>>> basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling: > > > >>>> they can, therefore, have no honor astrue in every case in an absolute sense. > > > >>> Yes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser.
he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda? > > > >> That's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort of > > > >> feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit > > > >> farther: in feminizing males, the entireDoes it work like that? > > > >>> Funny, Saw. > > > >>> > > > >>> There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if
The Iceberg kirjoitti 20.9.2023 klo 23.12:These female characters in media are almost always written by men, and men project things onto them. I tell men to think of a single situation in their life where:
On Wednesday, 20 September 2023 at 19:36:04 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 9:57:18 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>> On 9/20/23 9:26 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 18:02:24 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/19/23 9:47 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 8:56:06 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/19/23 3:09 AM, rec.sport.tennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 01:36:41 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote: >>>>>>>>> PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
just read this article, yes very well written and interesting! he the best journalist cos he answers to no one and can say anything he likes.https://www.tiktok.com/@she_persisted2.0/video/7279426789313908014Our politicians are really great-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYou should read America's greatest journalist and writer on this. >>>>>>>>>
Andrew Anglin
https://dailystormer.in/grimy-hoe-lauren-boebert-did-public-dick-stroking-of-a-dude-who-owns-a-faggot-bar/
Very good article, very good.
From my observation, a big part of the reason that so many men have such an inaccurate perception of women is that they are (probably subconsciously) basing their understanding of women in part on female characters in entertainment media.
Most women who talk about politics, you will note, are only interested in issues that directly affect their personal lives, such as abortion, or which provide a platform for them to draw attention to themselves and signal their high morality by siding
A woman has offered interesting conversation, or
A woman has shown remorse (or taken responsibility) for anything she’s done wrong.
Women do not have beliefs because they do not have convictions. They are not compelled in the way that men are compelled. Therefore, politics are impossible for them to understand or care about, as at least real politics relate to convictions.
men etc) and as honor etc. is male they would prob go totally against that.disagree as no sign/evidence of any of this from lesbians, sure Anglin would say they are regular women and no different at all really, in fact they are possibly even more disloyal as they generally hate men(they think they've been oppressed byThat's all well and good, but the the author mentions a sort ofI skimmed over the article. I think the author has some valid basic >>>>>>> observations about the differences in the traditional roles of >>>>>>> male/female in European society but that he magnifies the differences toYes. Did you know that Anglin cannot enter the US lest he be arrested for skipping town after losing a suit about his encouragement of violence against Jews? He is a mama's boy and a loser. Actions speak louder than words.
gain a polemic position and then states these magnified differences as
true in every case in an absolute sense.
But enough of that. Let's play around with the idea that women are >>>>>>> basically irresponsible due to the role they see themselves as filling:Funny, Saw.
they can, therefore, have no honor as men understand the term. Let's try
on the idea that de-feminized women--assertive lesbians--exhibit >>>>>>> some/all of the same motivations that men do. That they are therefore
just as responsible as men, and possibly have honor.
Does it work like that?
There are plenty of irresponsible men, and plenty of responsible women. Anglin is a pussy and a hypocrite for not taking responsibility for his actions. Who cares if he writes well? Where does he post from now, Rwanda?
feminization of males in the US--which I agree with--and I'd go a bit >>>>> farther: in feminizing males, the entire culture becomes more feminized
simply as a result of the lessening of masculine values in the general >>>>> society.
I'm not taking a stand on this just yet. I have an initial stance, but >>>>> it's really just reflexive, since I'm a traditionalist. I'm trying to >>>>> test it.
But if, for the sake of argument, it's true that males are becoming >>>>> feminized and in doing so the value of honor and ultimate responsibility
(male values, as per the article) are being lessened, would the
masculinization of females, as per assertive, male role lesbians, mean >>>>> that the lost masculinity (if this is indeed what's happening) is now >>>>> being recaptured in masculinized females?
I don't care about the author, at all. It's these intriguing
possibilities that interest me.
Yes.Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.
On thinking about it a little after I wrote that, I saw male-assertive >>> lesbians as cynical caricatures of males. These lesbians really only do >>> the surface masculine stuff, and not the deep commitments to protection >>> and guidance that traditionalist straight men do.
And like many homosexuals, they are narcissistic, putting on a public >>> show. So it's an act, really.
don't you call everyone who disagrees with your sick Marxism a "narcissist", from Trump to Anglin to Djoker they're all narcissists, according to you, yes? you don't really know what the word means, do you.You don't think Trump is a narcissist?
bmoore <bmo...@nyx.net> writes:
Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.
He's not gay??!
Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:20:43 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
bmoore <bmo...@nyx.net> writes:
Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but
narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.
He's not gay??!
Any guy with a cat likes pussy.
bmoore <bmo...@nyx.net> writes:
Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.He's not gay??!
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:20:43 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
bmoore <bmo...@nyx.net> writes:
In the closet? Hmm.Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.He's not gay??!
On Friday, 22 September 2023 at 00:09:14 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:20:43 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
bmoore <bmo...@nyx.net> writes:
is that cos I don't fancy the dream "woman" of you two? HAAHHAHAHAHAHHHA https://e3.365dm.com/21/03/2048x1152/skynews-rachel-levine_5316866.jpgIn the closet? Hmm.Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, but narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.He's not gay??!
On Friday, 22 September 2023 at 00:09:14 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:20:43 AM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:is that cos I don't fancy the dream "woman" of you two? HAAHHAHAHAHAHHHA https://e3.365dm.com/21/03/2048x1152/skynews-rachel-levine_5316866.jpg
bmoore <bmo...@nyx.net> writes:In the closet? Hmm.
Yes, much like Iceberg. No, Iceberg, I don't think you're gay, butHe's not gay??!
narcissist, for sure. Ain't no doubt about it.
is that cos I don't fancy the dream "woman" of you two?
HAAHHAHAHAHAHHHA https://e3.365dm.com/21/03/2048x1152/skynews-rachel-levine_5316866.jpg
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 117:12:41 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,237 |
