https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis <skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
Maybe there's a better way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata
Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis
<skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
Maybe there's a better way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata
Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.
or in Scotland!
https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/
Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg<iceberg.rules@gmail.com> wrote:>On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis >> <skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote: >rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/>Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on recordAnd then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, theScottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg >> >> Maybe there's a better way. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata >> >> Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.>>or in Scotland!>>https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.
Custos Custodum <me@privacy.net> Wrote in message:r23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/>Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on recordAnd then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, theScottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.https://
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg<iceberg.rules@gmail.com> wrote:>On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis >> <skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg >> >> Maybe there's a better way. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata >> >> Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.>>or in Scotland!>>https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/
But it's not Iceberg's fault.
He doesn't support globalist agenda.
You do.
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.
What makes you think that?
Custos Custodum <me@privacy.net> Wrote in message:
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
You're a globalist.
Custos Custodum <me@privacy.net> Wrote in message:
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.
But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?
You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
You're a globalist.
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's muchWhat makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on here.
It makes periodic vacations necessary.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg
<iceber...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis
<skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
Maybe there's a better way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata
Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.
or in Scotland!
https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/And then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, the
Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record
Scottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.
https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.uk/blog/sexual-assault-data-stats/#:~:text=The%20charity%20'Rape%20Crisis'%20has,or%20sexual%20assault%20every%20year.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:15:27 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis <skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/>Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on recordAnd then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, theScottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:r
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg<iceber...@gmail.com> wrote:>On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis >> <skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote: >>
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg >> >> Maybe there's a better way. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata >> >> Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.>>or in Scotland!>>https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.
But it's not Iceberg's fault.How do you know what he gets up to on Saturday nights when he is not flipping burgers?
He doesn't support globalist agenda.Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another
rightarded soundbite.
You do.
What makes you think that?
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:39:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis <skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.
But white supremacists are real?
Either that or they're just trolling. They're certainly vociferous
enough.
What makes you think that?
You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.I suggest you look up the meaning of "false dichotomy". One day you
may find out that life isn't as black and white as you think it is.
You're a globalist.
And you're an idiot.
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 15:13:39 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis
<skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
Maybe there's a better way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata
Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.
or in Scotland!
https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/And then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, the
Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record
Scottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.
https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.uk/blog/sexual-assault-data-stats/#:~:text=The%20charity%20'Rape%20Crisis'%20has,or%20sexual%20assault%20every%20year.what's that got to with England? you mentioned Russia, dimvit.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
It's twisted thinking.This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's muchWhat makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on here.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:45:36 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 15:13:39 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis
<skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
Maybe there's a better way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata
Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.
or in Scotland!
https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/And then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, the
Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record
Scottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.
And then you mentioned Scotland, duh.https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.uk/blog/sexual-assault-data-stats/#:~:text=The%20charity%20'Rape%20Crisis'%20has,or%20sexual%20assault%20every%20year.what's that got to with England? you mentioned Russia, dimvit.
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 16:57:55 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:45:36 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 15:13:39 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis
<skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
Maybe there's a better way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata
Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.
or in Scotland!
https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/And then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, the Scottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.
Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record
yes cos he comes from Scotchland, duh.And then you mentioned Scotland, duh.https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.uk/blog/sexual-assault-data-stats/#:~:text=The%20charity%20'Rape%20Crisis'%20has,or%20sexual%20assault%20every%20year.what's that got to with England? you mentioned Russia, dimvit.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:It's twisted thinking.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
It makes periodic vacations necessary.:-)
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very distasteful. It makes periodic vacations necessary.> :-)
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:00:17 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 16:57:55 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:45:36 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 15:13:39 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis
<skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
Maybe there's a better way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata
Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.
or in Scotland!
https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/And then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, the Scottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.
Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record
And you don't come from England?yes cos he comes from Scotchland, duh.And then you mentioned Scotland, duh.https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.uk/blog/sexual-assault-data-stats/#:~:text=The%20charity%20'Rape%20Crisis'%20has,or%20sexual%20assault%20every%20year.what's that got to with England? you mentioned Russia, dimvit.
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:It's twisted thinking.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on >> here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really *bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from which the original position might be refined or even discarded if fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very distasteful.
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:04:45 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:whinge about Russia when it as bad or possibly worse in Scotland. It also totally irrelevant to the debate where I come from, as it between Russia and Scotland.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:00:17 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 16:57:55 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:45:36 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 15:13:39 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis
<skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
Maybe there's a better way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata
Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.
or in Scotland!
https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/And then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, the Scottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.
Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record
look comrade thicko, Custom was having his usual stereotypical Russophobic dig at Russia and said they were rapists, so I pointed out rape was at an all-time high in Scotland, because Scotland is where he(the accuser) comes from, he can't sit there andAnd you don't come from England?yes cos he comes from Scotchland, duh.And then you mentioned Scotland, duh.https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.uk/blog/sexual-assault-data-stats/#:~:text=The%20charity%20'Rape%20Crisis'%20has,or%20sexual%20assault%20every%20year.what's that got to with England? you mentioned Russia, dimvit.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:13:40 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:> On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:04:45 UTC+1, bmoore wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:00:17 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 12 September 2023at 16:57:55 UTC+1, bmoore wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:45:36 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 15:13:39 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The
wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Maybe there's a better way. > > > > > > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Might not work withthe raping Ruzzians, though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >or in Scotland! > > > > > > > > > > > > > >https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/ > > > > > > >Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record > > >
The%20charity%20'Rape%20Crisis'%20has,or%20sexual%20assault%20every%20year. > > > > > what's that got to with England? you mentioned Russia, dimvit. > > > > And then you mentioned Scotland, duh. > > > yes cos he comes from Scotchland, duh. > > And youAnd then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, the > > > > > > Scottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.uk/blog/sexual-assault-data-stats/#:~:text=
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:It's twisted thinking.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means >>>> no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on >>>> here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here
routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual
disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of
departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally
dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from
which the original position might be refined or even discarded if
fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very
distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:It's twisted thinking.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on >> here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really *bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from which the original position might be refined or even discarded if fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very distasteful.
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make Woke."It makes periodic vacations necessary.:-)
--Sawfish ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>> On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
It's twisted thinking.Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much >>>> less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means >>>> no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on >>>> here.
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here >> routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really >> *bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back >> fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking >> for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual
disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of >> departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros, >> and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally
dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general >> rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be >> met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually >> address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from >> which the original position might be refined or even discarded if
fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very
distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in
probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
...and that's the BIGGEST difference.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>> On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
It's twisted thinking.Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much >>>>>> less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means >>>>>> no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on >>>>>> here.
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here >>>> routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really >>>> *bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back >>>> fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking >>>> for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual >>>> disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of >>>> departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros, >>>> and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally
dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general >>>> rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be >>>> met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually >>>> address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from >>>> which the original position might be refined or even discarded if
fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very
distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad
because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in
probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
...and that's the BIGGEST difference.
On 9/12/23 10:55 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:The way I see it, you cannot begin to determine whether the proposition
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>> On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
It's twisted thinking.Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much >>>>>> less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here >>>> routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably. >>>> Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking >>>> for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual >>>> disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy, >>>> e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of >>>> departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of >>>> the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros, >>>> and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally >>>> dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be >>>> met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from >>>> which the original position might be refined or even discarded if
fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very >>>> distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad >> because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in
probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
...and that's the BIGGEST difference.
is right or not, or to what degree, until after the discussion. I mean,
the discussion is how you find out.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:13:40 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:and whinge about Russia when it as bad or possibly worse in Scotland. It also totally irrelevant to the debate where I come from, as it between Russia and Scotland.
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:04:45 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:00:17 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 16:57:55 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:45:36 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 15:13:39 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:25:26 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 12:38:57 UTC+1, Custos Custodum wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:50:35 +0200 (GMT+02:00), *skriptis
<skri...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/7J95T1d/F5co-Ju-XWg-AAu9-Sx.jpg
Maybe there's a better way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata
Might not work with the raping Ruzzians, though.
or in Scotland!
https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23601272.rapes-scotland-highest-level-record/And then there is "lying by omission". Lamentable as it is, the Scottish rate per capita is still less than half of that in England.
Rapes in Scotland at their highest level on record
look comrade thicko, Custom was having his usual stereotypical Russophobic dig at Russia and said they were rapists, so I pointed out rape was at an all-time high in Scotland, because Scotland is where he(the accuser) comes from, he can't sit thereAnd you don't come from England?yes cos he comes from Scotchland, duh.And then you mentioned Scotland, duh.https://criminalinjurieshelpline.co.uk/blog/sexual-assault-data-stats/#:~:text=The%20charity%20'Rape%20Crisis'%20has,or%20sexual%20assault%20every%20year.what's that got to with England? you mentioned Russia, dimvit.
Wow. You entered the debate by saying Scotland was like Russia, because the previous poster brought up Russia and is from Scotland.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 11:07:41 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:55 AM, bmoore wrote:Agreed, the discussion should aid the investigation, not hinder it.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:The way I see it, you cannot begin to determine whether the proposition
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>> On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here. >>>>
It's twisted thinking.Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here
routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably. >>>> Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual
disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy, >>>> e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of
departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of >>>> the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally >>>> dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from
which the original position might be refined or even discarded if >>>> fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very >>>> distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad
because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in
probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
...and that's the BIGGEST difference.
is right or not, or to what degree, until after the discussion. I mean, the discussion is how you find out.
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>> On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
It's twisted thinking.Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much >>>> less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here >> routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking >> for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual >> disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy, >> e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of >> departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of >> the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros, >> and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally
dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be >> met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from >> which the original position might be refined or even discarded if
fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very
distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
...and that's the BIGGEST difference.At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 18:55:07 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>> On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
It's twisted thinking.Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here
routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably. >> Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual
disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy, >> e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of
departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of >> the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally >> dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from
which the original position might be refined or even discarded if
fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very >> distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
no "being right" is very important when it's your Marxist stuff like telling us a man wearing a dress = a woman and somehow biological men who "feel" they are women aren't literally mentally deluded....and that's the BIGGEST difference.At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 3:20:21 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 18:55:07 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here. >>
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:It's twisted thinking.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here
routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual
disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of
departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally >> dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from
which the original position might be refined or even discarded if >> fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very
distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad
because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
I've never said that. You're wrong.no "being right" is very important when it's your Marxist stuff like telling us a man wearing a dress = a woman and somehow biological men who "feel" they are women aren't literally mentally deluded....and that's the BIGGEST difference.At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
You just "fight". Lame.
On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 15:33:17 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 3:20:21 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 18:55:07 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here. >>
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:It's twisted thinking.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes. >>>> This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here
routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual
disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of
departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally
dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from
which the original position might be refined or even discarded if >> fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very
distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad
because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
I've never said that. You're wrong.no "being right" is very important when it's your Marxist stuff like telling us a man wearing a dress = a woman and somehow biological men who "feel" they are women aren't literally mentally deluded....and that's the BIGGEST difference.At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
You just "fight". Lame.you've leapt in countless times to defend any criticism of woke stuff or any Biden policy, that's kind of a very clear indication of your support for it, comrade!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 9:57:59 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 15:33:17 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 3:20:21 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 18:55:07 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:It's twisted thinking.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message:less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes. >>>> This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here
routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual
disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into >> interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of
departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally
dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from
which the original position might be refined or even discarded if
fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very
distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad
because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
I've never said that. You're wrong.no "being right" is very important when it's your Marxist stuff like telling us a man wearing a dress = a woman and somehow biological men who "feel" they are women aren't literally mentally deluded....and that's the BIGGEST difference.At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
No, I have not. You play fast and loose with the facts. The newsgroup co-idiot.You just "fight". Lame.you've leapt in countless times to defend any criticism of woke stuff or any Biden policy, that's kind of a very clear indication of your support for it, comrade!
On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 18:07:21 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 9:57:59 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 15:33:17 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 3:20:21 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 18:55:07 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:It's twisted thinking.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message: >>>>>> Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here
routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual
disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of
departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally
dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from
which the original position might be refined or even discarded if
fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very
distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad
because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in
probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
I've never said that. You're wrong.no "being right" is very important when it's your Marxist stuff like telling us a man wearing a dress = a woman and somehow biological men who "feel" they are women aren't literally mentally deluded....and that's the BIGGEST difference.At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
yes you have, you liar, everyone on the group knows you voted Biden, you subscribe to the New York Slimes and you even tried to defend the woke "genderless God" thing, why is it your type find it so hard to admit anything, comrade?No, I have not. You play fast and loose with the facts. The newsgroup co-idiot.You just "fight". Lame.you've leapt in countless times to defend any criticism of woke stuff or any Biden policy, that's kind of a very clear indication of your support for it, comrade!
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 12:55:06 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 18:07:21 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 9:57:59 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 15:33:17 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 3:20:21 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 18:55:07 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 10:48:13 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/12/23 10:27 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 17:14:56 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:Did I ever say "not so different"?
On 9/12/23 8:53 AM, bmoore wrote:so you're saying bmoore(a Marxist who voted Biden over Trump, supports more and more of this trans/gender/society wrecking stuff, supported BLM and anything woke agenda) is "not so different" from guys like skrip and myself?!
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:13:11 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:This is interesting. It's the way I thought for a long time here.
On 9/12/23 7:39 AM, *skriptis wrote:It's twisted thinking.
Custos Custodum <m...@privacy.net> Wrote in message: >>>>>> Whatever the "globalist agenda" may be. To me it's just another rightarded soundbite.This is the most basic underlying social mechanism on RST. It's much
But white supremacists are real?
What makes you think that?You oppose Iceberg so it means you support what he opposes.
less what the actual issues are, but rather who holds them. This means
no actual thinking, but a giant shitload of figurative shouting goes on
here.
I used to see profoundly flawed logic and unvetted data being used here
routinely. The obvious problems with allowing these in discussion really
*bothered* me because it's just plain too sloppy accept comfortably.
Like listening to Mrs. Moscowitz and Mrs. Yehudi gossiping over the back
fence in Brooklyn in 1934.
Gradually I realized that maybe 70-80% of the posts were simply looking
for conflict. This naturally caused interpersonal enmity and so actual
disagreements over demonstrable point of difference in social policy,
e.g., took second place to trading insults. This devolved into
interlocutors creating straw men routinely to use as a sort of point of
departure for more fightin'.
I mean, it's entirely possible to raise a topic like the evolution of
the western grip, and why it is/was the dominant grip used in the pros,
and get no responses, whatsoever. And this in a newsgroup nominally
dedicated to tennis.
So next would be to take life observations and attempt to make a general
rule that might govern 80% of all cases, and that will fall flat, or be
met with either derision or outright enmity, with no attempt to actually
address the points, when it was meant to stimulate an interaction, from
which the original position might be refined or even discarded if
fundamentally flawed.
I have tried to back away from all this because it's personally very
distasteful.
forgive for saying but did similar folks tell you that Africans leaders are "not so different" from Western leaders when aparthied collapsed too??!It looks like I've gotten onto your "fightin' list", Ice. That's too bad
because basically we see actual issues/behaviors about the same in
probably 85% of all cases, but I just don't like fightin' here.
I've never said that. You're wrong.no "being right" is very important when it's your Marxist stuff like telling us a man wearing a dress = a woman and somehow biological men who "feel" they are women aren't literally mentally deluded....and that's the BIGGEST difference.At the end of the day, "being right" is less important than actual discussion.
You're like a little boy.yes you have, you liar, everyone on the group knows you voted Biden, you subscribe to the New York Slimes and you even tried to defend the woke "genderless God" thing, why is it your type find it so hard to admit anything, comrade?No, I have not. You play fast and loose with the facts. The newsgroup co-idiot.You just "fight". Lame.you've leapt in countless times to defend any criticism of woke stuff or any Biden policy, that's kind of a very clear indication of your support for it, comrade!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 116:15:12 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,176 |
