Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.
Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.
"Shakes" <kvcs...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.Alcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play medved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well.
Also, Medvedev is serving like a maniac, his percentage has to drop in order Alcaraz cann have a chance.
--
----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
Not sure. Med served quite poorly through most of the 1st set, missing a lot of 1st serves. He still managed to hold on. In fact, that probably increased his confidence and he relaxed a little, and his serving improved.
Alcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play medved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as wellCorrection: find a way to get Medvedev to pay for his court ****
----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
Not sure. Med served quite poorly through most of the 1st set, missing a lot of 1st serves. He still managed to hold on. In fact, that probably increased his confidence and he relaxed a little, and his serving improved.Not sure, I see Medvedev have been serving unreturnables on 1st and 2nd serves.
----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:54:10PM UTC-7, PeteWasLucky wrote:> > Alcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play medved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well> Correction: find a way toget Medvedev to pay for his court ****> ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlI understood what you meant. :)But Med has really played impressive so far. Good to see. BTW, no matter who he plays,
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:57:35PM UTC-7, PeteWasLucky wrote:> > Not sure. Med served quite poorly through most of the 1st set, missing a lot of 1st serves. He still managed to hold on. In fact, that probably increased his confidence and herelaxed a little, and his serving improved.> Not sure, I see Medvedev have been serving unreturnables on 1st and 2nd serves.> ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlWell, as per stats, Med has 4
Alcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play medved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well
"Shakes" <kvcshake@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.
Alcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play medved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well.
Also, Medvedev is serving like a maniac, his percentage has to drop in order Alcaraz cann have a chance.
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 3.43:> "Shakes" <kvcshake@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.> > Alcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to playmedved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well.> > Also, Medvedev is serving like a maniac, his percentage has to drop in order Alcaraz cann have a chance.Good serving from Meds & standard play.Alkie making lots of errors & poor
TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:rmedved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well.> > Also, Medvedev is serving like a maniac, his percentage has to drop in order Alcaraz cann have a chance.Good serving from Meds & standard play.Alkie making lots of errors & poor
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 3.43:> "Shakes" <kvcshake@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.> > Alcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play
Standard play? :) yes sure
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 5.28:> TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r>> PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 3.43:> "Shakes" <kvcshake@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.> >Alcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play medved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well.> > Also, Medvedev is serving like a maniac, his percentage has to drop in order Alcaraz cann have a
Meds has something to do with it yes. And no, Alkie made mistakes that didn't depend on Meds's play. Bad mistakes and plenty of them. Alkie can hang with Meds from back of the court.
There is a fundamental flaw with Alcaraz's game; it's based too much on feeling, confidence & improvisation. He often improvises too much, goes
for crazy shots too much.
He's also a choker and can lose confidence abruptly. Talented as hell,
but not perfect.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:rAlcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play medved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well.> > Also, Medvedev is serving like a maniac, his percentage has to drop in order Alcaraz cann have a
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 5.28:> TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r>> PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 3.43:> "Shakes" <kvcshake@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.> >
Alcaraz was full of errors because medvedev was getting every ball back with interest and was rarely missing.
The same applies to Alcaraz not trusting his ground game, it was because of medvedev madness.
*) Did in Wimb final quite well, right?
I think Alkie made a rookie mistake; underestimated Meds.
I think Alkie made a rookie mistake; underestimated Meds.What does "underestimated" really mean? :)
Medved was on fire and had this crazy look on his face before the match, during the match and in his previous match, the same look he had when he defeated Djokovic in the US open.
Every out of the world shot Alcaraz threw on him he answered it with a superior shot.
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:27:41 PM UTC+3, PeteWasLucky wrote:
I think Alkie made a rookie mistake; underestimated Meds.What does "underestimated" really mean? :)
Medved was on fire and had this crazy look on his face before the match, during the match and in his previous match, the same look he had when he defeated Djokovic in the US open.
Every out of the world shot Alcaraz threw on him he answered it with a superior shot.
Not a case in 2023 previous matches (5 sets all to Alkie)
Meds raised things. (I have said this for year; this guy has also tennis IQ)
Just like Del Potro-Nadal SF USO 2009.
Everyone expected Nadal to sweep, but it was Delpo who did sweeping business.
.mikko
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 16.35:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:27:41 PM UTC+3, PeteWasLucky wrote: >>>> I think Alkie made a rookie mistake; underestimated Meds.
What does "underestimated" really mean? :)
Medved was on fire and had this crazy look on his face before the
match, during the match and in his previous match, the same look he
had when he defeated Djokovic in the US open.
Every out of the world shot Alcaraz threw on him he answered it with
a superior shot.
Not a case in 2023 previous matches (5 sets all to Alkie)
Meds raised things. (I have said this for year; this guy has also
tennis IQ)
Just like Del Potro-Nadal SF USO 2009.
Everyone expected Nadal to sweep, but it was Delpo who did sweeping
business.
.mikko
Why be dishonest about it?
Nadal had 6mm abdominal tear
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 7.04:He is the Charlie Parker of modern tennis.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 5.28:> TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in
message:r>> PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 3.43:> "Shakes"
<kvcshake@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> Great composure and play
by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.> > Alcaraz has to
find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play
medved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as
well.> > Also, Medvedev is serving like a maniac, his percentage has
to drop in order Alcaraz cann have a chance.Good serving from Meds &
standard play.Alkie making lots of errors & poor choices, choking a
bit.Maybe Alkie is turning the match around... could go to 5th...> >
Standard play? :) yes sureYes. Meds played his average play. Alkie
was full of errors. Nothing special really. Meds serving great in
2nd set.Fun to see so much s/v from Alcaraz. Probably too much. I
felt that Alkie didn't believe in his ground game.
Alcaraz was full of errors because medvedev was getting every ball
back with interest and was rarely missing.
The same applies to Alcaraz not trusting his ground game, it was
because of medvedev madness.
Meds has something to do with it yes. And no, Alkie made mistakes that
didn't depend on Meds's play. Bad mistakes and plenty of them. Alkie
can hang with Meds from back of the court.
There is a fundamental flaw with Alcaraz's game; it's based too much
on feeling, confidence & improvisation.
He often improvises too much, goes for crazy shots too much.
He's also a choker and can lose confidence abruptly. Talented as hell,
but not perfect.
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 7.04:Alcaraz has to find a way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play medved's game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well.> > Also, Medvedev is serving like a maniac, his percentage has to drop in order Alcaraz cann have a
TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 5.28:> TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r>> PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 3.43:> "Shakes" <kvcshake@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.> >
Alcaraz was full of errors because medvedev was getting every ball back with interest and was rarely missing.
The same applies to Alcaraz not trusting his ground game, it was because of medvedev madness.
Meds has something to do with it yes. And no, Alkie made mistakes that didn't depend on Meds's play. Bad mistakes and plenty of them. Alkie can hang with Meds from back of the court.
There is a fundamental flaw with Alcaraz's game; it's based too much on feeling, confidence & improvisation. He often improvises too much, goes for crazy shots too much.
He's also a choker and can lose confidence abruptly. Talented as hell, but not perfect.
On 9/9/23 12:15 AM, TT wrote:
There is a fundamental flaw with Alcaraz's game; it's based too much
on feeling, confidence & improvisation.
He is the Charlie Parker of modern tennis.
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 8:02:08 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/9/23 12:15 AM, TT wrote:
There is a fundamental flaw with Alcaraz's game; it's based too much
on feeling, confidence & improvisation.
He beats everyone in his path to win the USO or Wimbledon, he's a scintillating phenom. He loses in the USO semis to a zoning Russian, his game is fundamentally flawed Ah, hell, back to the drawing board, Carlos. :)
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 16.35:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:27:41 PM UTC+3, PeteWasLucky wrote:
I think Alkie made a rookie mistake; underestimated Meds.What does "underestimated" really mean? :)
Medved was on fire and had this crazy look on his face before the match, during the match and in his previous match, the same look he had when he defeated Djokovic in the US open.
Every out of the world shot Alcaraz threw on him he answered it with a superior shot.
Not a case in 2023 previous matches (5 sets all to Alkie)
Meds raised things. (I have said this for year; this guy has also tennis IQ)
Just like Del Potro-Nadal SF USO 2009.
Everyone expected Nadal to sweep, but it was Delpo who did sweeping business.
.mikkoWhy be dishonest about it?
Nadal had 6mm abdominal tear beginning of USO 2009 and 26mm against
On 9.9.2023 18.15, Gracchus wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 8:02:08 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 9/9/23 12:15 AM, TT wrote:
There is a fundamental flaw with Alcaraz's game; it's based too much
on feeling, confidence & improvisation.
He beats everyone in his path to win the USO or Wimbledon, he's a
scintillating phenom. He loses in the USO semis to a zoning Russian,
his game is fundamentally flawed Ah, hell, back to the drawing board,
Carlos. :)
Tiny's ray of hope is that Alcatraz keeps beating Djok until next year
when mancrush Rafito comes back and wins RG. Then Tiny can declare him
GOAT. In the meantime, everytime Alcatraz does beat Djok, he's the
greatest thing around. When he fails to stop Djok, he's again a choker
and a "fundamentally flawed" player.
*Rolls eyes*
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:58:01 PM UTC+3, TT wrote:
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 16.35:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:27:41 PM UTC+3, PeteWasLucky wrote: >>>>> I think Alkie made a rookie mistake; underestimated Meds.Why be dishonest about it?
What does "underestimated" really mean? :)
Medved was on fire and had this crazy look on his face before the match, during the match and in his previous match, the same look he had when he defeated Djokovic in the US open.
Every out of the world shot Alcaraz threw on him he answered it with a superior shot.
Not a case in 2023 previous matches (5 sets all to Alkie)
Meds raised things. (I have said this for year; this guy has also tennis IQ)
Just like Del Potro-Nadal SF USO 2009.
Everyone expected Nadal to sweep, but it was Delpo who did sweeping business.
.mikko
Nadal had 6mm abdominal tear beginning of USO 2009 and 26mm against
Nadal had always best ..or most numerous?... excuses. He always had a luxury to refer "I did run tons in previous match". He is only sport athlete who had
written injury report confirmed already before the match...?
Even if Nadal got lucky with Balco scandal back then, props for successful hair implants 2016.
Single best excuse ever of a match is Iceberg's pizza for Sampras. Golden stuff. Injuries are so easy and lazy....
.mikko
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 18.48:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:58:01 PM UTC+3, TT wrote:
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 16.35:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:27:41 PM UTC+3, PeteWasLucky wrote:Why be dishonest about it?
I think Alkie made a rookie mistake; underestimated Meds.What does "underestimated" really mean? :)
Medved was on fire and had this crazy look on his face before the match, during the match and in his previous match, the same look he had when he defeated Djokovic in the US open.
Every out of the world shot Alcaraz threw on him he answered it with a superior shot.
Not a case in 2023 previous matches (5 sets all to Alkie)
Meds raised things. (I have said this for year; this guy has also tennis IQ)
Just like Del Potro-Nadal SF USO 2009.
Everyone expected Nadal to sweep, but it was Delpo who did sweeping business.
.mikko
Nadal had 6mm abdominal tear beginning of USO 2009 and 26mm against
Nadal had always best ..or most numerous?... excuses. He always had a luxury to refer "I did run tons in previous match". He is only sport athlete who had
written injury report confirmed already before the match...?
Sure... all excuses...
Even if Nadal got lucky with Balco scandal back then, props for successful hair implants 2016.
Single best excuse ever of a match is Iceberg's pizza for Sampras. Golden stuff. Injuries are so easy and lazy....
.mikko
Sounds that you're still bitter about Fedal...
I heard he could crush a man's skull with one hand.
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 7:03:11 PM UTC+3, TT wrote:
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 18.48:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:58:01 PM UTC+3, TT wrote:Sure... all excuses...
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 16.35:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:27:41 PM UTC+3, PeteWasLucky wrote: >>>>>>> I think Alkie made a rookie mistake; underestimated Meds.Why be dishonest about it?
What does "underestimated" really mean? :)
Medved was on fire and had this crazy look on his face before the match, during the match and in his previous match, the same look he had when he defeated Djokovic in the US open.
Every out of the world shot Alcaraz threw on him he answered it with a superior shot.
Not a case in 2023 previous matches (5 sets all to Alkie)
Meds raised things. (I have said this for year; this guy has also tennis IQ)
Just like Del Potro-Nadal SF USO 2009.
Everyone expected Nadal to sweep, but it was Delpo who did sweeping business.
.mikko
Nadal had 6mm abdominal tear beginning of USO 2009 and 26mm against
Nadal had always best ..or most numerous?... excuses. He always had a luxury to refer "I did run tons in previous match". He is only sport athlete who had
written injury report confirmed already before the match...?
Even if Nadal got lucky with Balco scandal back then, props for successful hair implants 2016.Sounds that you're still bitter about Fedal...
Single best excuse ever of a match is Iceberg's pizza for Sampras. Golden stuff. Injuries are so easy and lazy....
.mikko
? have no reason?
I like Djokovic, Murray, Delpo, Wawrinka over Fedal. Why should I care about Fedal.
It was me who brought the fact that Fed and Tiger woods have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early 2000s.
My cup of 2000:s crop is Safin, Kuerten, Murray, Delpo, Meds.
Of big3 I prefer Djoker, but they all three have tons of stuff to dislike.....
.mikko
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 19.22:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 7:03:11 PM UTC+3, TT wrote:
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 18.48:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:58:01 PM UTC+3, TT wrote:Sure... all excuses...
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 16.35:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:27:41 PM UTC+3, PeteWasLucky wrote:Why be dishonest about it?
I think Alkie made a rookie mistake; underestimated Meds.What does "underestimated" really mean? :)
Medved was on fire and had this crazy look on his face before the match, during the match and in his previous match, the same look he had when he defeated Djokovic in the US open.
Every out of the world shot Alcaraz threw on him he answered it with a superior shot.
Not a case in 2023 previous matches (5 sets all to Alkie)
Meds raised things. (I have said this for year; this guy has also tennis IQ)
Just like Del Potro-Nadal SF USO 2009.
Everyone expected Nadal to sweep, but it was Delpo who did sweeping business.
.mikko
Nadal had 6mm abdominal tear beginning of USO 2009 and 26mm against
Nadal had always best ..or most numerous?... excuses. He always had a luxury to refer "I did run tons in previous match". He is only sport athlete who had
written injury report confirmed already before the match...?
Even if Nadal got lucky with Balco scandal back then, props for successful hair implants 2016.Sounds that you're still bitter about Fedal...
Single best excuse ever of a match is Iceberg's pizza for Sampras. Golden stuff. Injuries are so easy and lazy....
.mikko
? have no reason?
I like Djokovic, Murray, Delpo, Wawrinka over Fedal. Why should I care about Fedal.
It was me who brought the fact that Fed and Tiger woods have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early 2000s.
My cup of 2000:s crop is Safin, Kuerten, Murray, Delpo, Meds.
Of big3 I prefer Djoker, but they all three have tons of stuff to dislike.....
.mikkoWE all know you're fedfan...
Fed and Tiger woods have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early 2000s.
Fed and Tiger woods have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early 2000s.Is this an issue?
Great composure and play by Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 7.04:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r
PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 5.28:> TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in
message:r>> PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 3.43:> "Shakes"
<kvcshake@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r>> Great composure and play by
Med so far. Hung tough and is playing solid.> > Alcaraz has to find a
way to pay for his court position. If he continues to play medved's
game staying very back he will lose and get injured as well.> > Also,
Medvedev is serving like a maniac, his percentage has to drop in
order Alcaraz cann have a chance.Good serving from Meds & standard
play.Alkie making lots of errors & poor choices, choking a bit.Maybe
Alkie is turning the match around... could go to 5th...> > Standard
play? :) yes sureYes. Meds played his average play. Alkie was full of
errors. Nothing special really. Meds serving great in 2nd set.Fun to
see so much s/v from Alcaraz. Probably too much. I felt that Alkie
didn't believe in his ground game.
Alcaraz was full of errors because medvedev was getting every ball
back with interest and was rarely missing.
The same applies to Alcaraz not trusting his ground game, it was
because of medvedev madness.
Meds has something to do with it yes. And no, Alkie made mistakes that
didn't depend on Meds's play. Bad mistakes and plenty of them. Alkie can
hang with Meds from back of the court.
There is a fundamental flaw with Alcaraz's game; it's based too much on feeling, confidence & improvisation. He often improvises too much, goes
for crazy shots too much.
He's also a choker and can lose confidence abruptly. Talented as hell,
but not perfect.
MBDunc kirjoitti 9.9.2023 klo 11.11:
*) Did in Wimb final quite well, right?
Certainly. I think he's natural on grass. His variety fits great for the surface.
I guess I may be missing something here.
You said "It was me who brought the fact that Fed and Tiger woods
have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early
2000s.".
What is the importance of bringing out this fact?
On 10/09/2023 6:22 am, PeteWasLucky wrote:,
I guess I may be missing something here.
You said "It was me who brought the fact that Fed and Tiger woods
have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early
2000s.".
What is the importance of bringing out this fact?
It's pretty obvious no?
If your eyesight degrades naturally with age should you be allowed to artificially improve it with surgery so it enhances your tennis? If yes
then should you be able to artificially improve your stamina/muscles etc
as they degrade with age too? Or should we just allow Federer to cheat because he has 'beautiful' style on his strokes?
In short, Federer is a cheat who couldn't do it naturally.
On 10/09/2023 6:22 am, PeteWasLucky wrote:
I guess I may be missing something here.
You said "It was me who brought the fact that Fed and Tiger woods
have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early
2000s.".
What is the importance of bringing out this fact?
It's pretty obvious no?
If your eyesight degrades naturally with age should you be allowed to artificially improve it with surgery so it enhances your tennis? If yes
then should you be able to artificially improve your stamina/muscles etc
as they degrade with age too? Or should we just allow Federer to cheat because he has 'beautiful' style on his strokes?
In short, Federer is a cheat who couldn't do it naturally.
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 9:32:28 PM UTC+3, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Well, you have to see the ball, right?Fed and Tiger woods have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early 2000s.Is this an issue?
Note; I also have had eye laser surgery 2011, but technically it is like any artificial boost?
If smt like above is allowed, why not similar enhancements to other parts of your body?
Of course Nadal hair implant is innocent for tennis game sense....
.mikko
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 8:16:59 AM UTC-4, Whisper wrote:
On 10/09/2023 6:22 am, PeteWasLucky wrote:
I guess I may be missing something here.
You said "It was me who brought the fact that Fed and Tiger woods
have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early
2000s.".
What is the importance of bringing out this fact?
It's pretty obvious no?
If your eyesight degrades naturally with age should you be allowed to artificially improve it with surgery so it enhances your tennis? If yes then should you be able to artificially improve your stamina/muscles etc as they degrade with age too? Or should we just allow Federer to cheat because he has 'beautiful' style on his strokes?
In short, Federer is a cheat who couldn't do it naturally.wtf!
You forgot that Nadal had hair transplant and Sampras took Viagra.
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 5:16:59 AM UTC-7, Whisper wrote:
On 10/09/2023 6:22 am, PeteWasLucky wrote:,
I guess I may be missing something here.It's pretty obvious no?
You said "It was me who brought the fact that Fed and Tiger woods
have both artificially lasered 20/20 vision early
2000s.".
What is the importance of bringing out this fact?
If your eyesight degrades naturally with age should you be allowed to
artificially improve it with surgery so it enhances your tennis? If yes
then should you be able to artificially improve your stamina/muscles etc
as they degrade with age too? Or should we just allow Federer to cheat
because he has 'beautiful' style on his strokes?
In short, Federer is a cheat who couldn't do it naturally.Same with Navratilova, Ashe, etc--they actually were allowed to wear CORRECTIVE LENSES during their matches. I mean, if shouldn't the opponent be allowed a compensatory third serve or something? The outrages never cease.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 117:09:35 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,237 |