Looks like he found that rabbit again. I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in aboneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.Let's see how it pans
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.
Let's see how it pans out.
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.
Let's see how it pans out.
On Saturday, 2 September 2023 at 05:08:55 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:who when she said she got stressed serving when an opponent has a break point(which to her was a huge deal as if anyone would think her day job was playing tennis) he told her "you've got to stop playing tennis for a while when you're in that state" or
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.
Let's see how it pans out.
"somehow" yeah like how on earth does he do it?! yeah like how does he beat these young guys that have no physical stamina despite being 23 and give endless excuses about "mental problems" on why they can't win matches and have coaches like Badosa's
Yeah! just can't work it out why a super hard worker and person who wants to win tennis trophies like Djoker beats these guys so many times.
The thing is, he's done it so many times before and these guys REMEMBER how many times he's done it, so they start thinking about it once they have a lead on Djoke. Then when he turns up the juice, they start feeling they are done for and it becomes aself-fulfilling prophecy. Even Alcaraz admitted those thoughts were going through his mind at Wimbledon. Unfortunately for Laslo, he is no Alcaraz.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 2:03:50 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:who when she said she got stressed serving when an opponent has a break point(which to her was a huge deal as if anyone would think her day job was playing tennis) he told her "you've got to stop playing tennis for a while when you're in that state" or
On Saturday, 2 September 2023 at 05:08:55 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.
Let's see how it pans out.
"somehow" yeah like how on earth does he do it?! yeah like how does he beat these young guys that have no physical stamina despite being 23 and give endless excuses about "mental problems" on why they can't win matches and have coaches like Badosa's
self-fulfilling prophecy. Even Alcaraz admitted those thoughts were going through his mind at Wimbledon. Unfortunately for Laslo, he is no Alcaraz.Yeah! just can't work it out why a super hard worker and person who wants to win tennis trophies like Djoker beats these guys so many times.
The thing is, he's done it so many times before and these guys REMEMBER how many times he's done it, so they start thinking about it once they have a lead on Djoke. Then when he turns up the juice, >they start feeling they are done for and it becomes a
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 2:03:50 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:who when she said she got stressed serving when an opponent has a break point(which to her was a huge deal as if anyone would think her day job was playing tennis) he told her "you've got to stop playing tennis for a while when you're in that state" or
On Saturday, 2 September 2023 at 05:08:55 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic."somehow" yeah like how on earth does he do it?! yeah like how does he beat these young guys that have no physical stamina despite being 23 and give endless excuses about "mental problems" on why they can't win matches and have coaches like Badosa's
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.
Let's see how it pans out.
Yeah! just can't work it out why a super hard worker and person who wants to win tennis trophies like Djoker beats these guys so many times.The thing is, he's done it so many times before and these guys REMEMBER how many times he's done it, so they start thinking about it once they have a lead on Djoke.
Then when he turns up the juice, they start feeling they are done for and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Even Alcaraz admitted those thoughts were going through his mind at Wimbledon. Unfortunately for Laslo, he is no Alcaraz.
On Saturday, 2 September 2023 at 05:08:55 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:who when she said she got stressed serving when an opponent has a break point(which to her was a huge deal as if anyone would think her day job was playing tennis) he told her "you've got to stop playing tennis for a while when you're in that state" or
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic."somehow" yeah like how on earth does he do it?! yeah like how does he beat these young guys that have no physical stamina despite being 23 and give endless excuses about "mental problems" on why they can't win matches and have coaches like Badosa's
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.
Let's see how it pans out.
Yeah! just can't work it out why a super hard worker and person who wants to win tennis trophies like Djoker beats these guys so many times.
On 2.9.2023 7.08, Court_1 wrote:
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.Judging by the scoreline, he switched to second gear, gently brushed the accelerator and the schnook is in the rear-view mirror. It's the
difference between a finely tuned V-12 and a Yugo. I've seen this happen before and it's AWESOME when you get to witness it. You can almost feel
the acceleration yourself.
On 2/09/2023 11:05 pm, Gracchus wrote:who when she said she got stressed serving when an opponent has a break point(which to her was a huge deal as if anyone would think her day job was playing tennis) he told her "you've got to stop playing tennis for a while when you're in that state" or
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 2:03:50 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Saturday, 2 September 2023 at 05:08:55 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.
Let's see how it pans out.
"somehow" yeah like how on earth does he do it?! yeah like how does he beat these young guys that have no physical stamina despite being 23 and give endless excuses about "mental problems" on why they can't win matches and have coaches like Badosa's
a self-fulfilling prophecy. Even Alcaraz admitted those thoughts were going through his mind at Wimbledon. Unfortunately for Laslo, he is no Alcaraz.Yeah! just can't work it out why a super hard worker and person who wants to win tennis trophies like Djoker beats these guys so many times.
The thing is, he's done it so many times before and these guys REMEMBER how many times he's done it, so they start thinking about it once they have a lead on Djoke. Then when he turns up the juice, >they start feeling they are done for and it becomes
Alcaraz is the only one to break the 5 set jinx, can't remember the last time Novak has lost a match that went 5? Off the top of my head that
9-7 5th set v Nadal at FO 10 yrs ago comes to mind, also 2014 AO loss to Stan. And probably at the hardest place to beat Djokovic, a Wimbledon
final. Carlos has been 'baptized by fire' with these gutsy matches v
Novak and it has to have made him a better player - every other opponent will seem like playing a junior by comparison. I think the loss to
Novak in Cincinnati will help him here if they meet in the final, he'll
be going in expecting a 6 hour slugfest and knows Novak is never dead
until the final point. Still some tennis left to play, but if they meet
I expect Carlos to win in 4.
Court_1 Wrote in message:rsomewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.Let's see how it pans out.
Looks like he found that rabbit again. I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard
I didn't know that the guy djok is playing now is a young multi slam champion.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:33:04AM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r > > Looks like he found that rabbit again. I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the
When technicality and experience are similar, then age matters and younger athletes are at advantage.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:48:16 AM UTC-4, Whisper wrote:who when she said she got stressed serving when an opponent has a break point(which to her was a huge deal as if anyone would think her day job was playing tennis) he told her "you've got to stop playing tennis for a while when you're in that state" or
On 2/09/2023 11:05 pm, Gracchus wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 2:03:50 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: >>>> On Saturday, 2 September 2023 at 05:08:55 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
Looks like he found that rabbit again. 🙄😏🐰 I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.
According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!
This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in the grave and then somehow he finds the needed energy just in the nick of time.
Let's see how it pans out.
"somehow" yeah like how on earth does he do it?! yeah like how does he beat these young guys that have no physical stamina despite being 23 and give endless excuses about "mental problems" on why they can't win matches and have coaches like Badosa's
a self-fulfilling prophecy. Even Alcaraz admitted those thoughts were going through his mind at Wimbledon. Unfortunately for Laslo, he is no Alcaraz.
Yeah! just can't work it out why a super hard worker and person who wants to win tennis trophies like Djoker beats these guys so many times.
The thing is, he's done it so many times before and these guys REMEMBER how many times he's done it, so they start thinking about it once they have a lead on Djoke. Then when he turns up the juice, >they start feeling they are done for and it becomes
Alcaraz is the only one to break the 5 set jinx, can't remember the last
time Novak has lost a match that went 5? Off the top of my head that
9-7 5th set v Nadal at FO 10 yrs ago comes to mind, also 2014 AO loss to
Stan. And probably at the hardest place to beat Djokovic, a Wimbledon
final. Carlos has been 'baptized by fire' with these gutsy matches v
Novak and it has to have made him a better player - every other opponent
will seem like playing a junior by comparison. I think the loss to
Novak in Cincinnati will help him here if they meet in the final, he'll
be going in expecting a 6 hour slugfest and knows Novak is never dead
until the final point. Still some tennis left to play, but if they meet
I expect Carlos to win in 4.
??? Why? What indicator has there been that Djokovic won't fight like hell? Dont' count that f****r out!
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:rquick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:33:04AM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r > > Looks like he found that rabbit again. I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a
I said this? Links please?
You are the one that is flying high talking about how great djokovic is beating some guy that I never heard of and using it as evidence that age doesn't matter
Again, the entire tour is useless, young and old, and age matters as it is a factor of many factors that influence the results.
Federer was stopped in slams mainly by Djokovic and Nadal. Both are 5 and 6 years younger than him and multi slam champions.
When technicality and experience are similar, then age matters and younger athletes are at advantage.
Court_1 Wrote in message:rquick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age home when Federer was 27!This sob Djokovic does this all the time. He looks like he's got one foot in
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:33:04 AM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r > > Looks like he found that rabbit again. I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a
I said this? Links please?
You are the one that is flying high talking about how great djokovic is beating some guy that I never heard of and using it as evidence that age doesn't matter
Again, the entire tour is useless, young and old, and age matters as it is a factor of many factors that influence the results.
Federer was stopped in slams mainly by Djokovic and Nadal. Both are 5 and 6 years younger than him and multi slam champions.
When technicality and experience are similar, then age matters and younger athletes are at advantage.
So there's no possibility of a player being better than another player? That's usually the reason a player wins less and loses more to his
rivals, ie he's not quite as good, though still a fantastic player.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 11:40:36PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:33:04 AM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r > > Looks like he found that rabbit again. Ijust got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age
Court_1 Wrote in message:rjust got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.According to PWL, Djokovic is old and feeble and should be in a boneyard somewhere. PWL had Federer in an old-age
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 11:40:36 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:33:04 AM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r > > Looks like he found that rabbit again. I
I am not going to read any of this post until you provide a link to the post that I said "Djokovic is more likely to lose to chumps?", otherwise this is a waste of time and you are just trolling.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 9:14:37PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r > > On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 11:40:36 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:33:04 AMUTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> Court_1 Wrote in message:r > > Looks like he found that rabbit again. I just got home and turned on the tv and was shocked to see the score. I thought it would have been a quick 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 win for Djokovic.According to PWL,
Court_1 Wrote in message:r
You used Djokovic's win against Alcaraz as evidence that age
doesn't matter.
So I wondered saying "Why don't you say the same when Djokovic
beats all the other younger players?
Simply because they aren't great players, correct?".
I simply asked why you didn't use "all other younger players that
get beaten by djokovic as well" as evidence that age isn't a
factor the same way you did with Alcaraz. Then I answered it for
you saying it's because they aren't great players like
Alcaraz.
Then I asserted what I said before when I said "Alcaraz is still
young and will mature by age and by losses but no one said he
won't lose to Djokovic again especially in three
sets.".
So tell me now, how does this translate to your lie saying that I
said "Djokovic is more likely to lose to chump"?!
Honestly I thought you are capable of comprehending simple
discussions, but it's either you are trolling or
incapable.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Honestly I thought you are capable of comprehending simple
discussions, but it's either you are trolling or
incapable.
Projection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:r
Honestly I thought you are capable of comprehending simple
discussions, but it's either you are trolling or
incapable.
Projection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:t the fact that Djokovic overtook two other goat players in Federer and Nadal the best evidence that he's a bit superior? Or do you consider Federer and Nadal average to poor players as well?
Court_1 Wrote in message:rI said that the fact that a 16 years older Djokovic can still beat Alcaraz shows us that the six year age difference between Federer and Djokovic that you bleat on about constantly isn't that material.
You used Djokovic's win against Alcaraz as evidence that age
doesn't matter.
So I wondered saying "Why don't you say the same when Djokovic
beats all the other younger players?
Simply because they aren't great players, correct?".
I simply asked why you didn't use "all other younger players thatSo there you go! You're admitting that Djokovic only beats chumps then? Why don't you answer my question to you: Are players like Nishikori, Raonic, Baghdatis, Gonzalez, etc. better players than Tsitsipas, Medvedev, Zverev in your estimation? Also, isn'
get beaten by djokovic as well" as evidence that age isn't a
factor the same way you did with Alcaraz. Then I answered it for
you saying it's because they aren't great players like
Alcaraz.
up with any desperate theory to keep your idol as the mythical goat despite so much evidence that shows otherwise.Then I asserted what I said before when I said "Alcaraz is stillBut what if Djokovic continues to beat him in best of five like he did at the FO? Will you then say Alcaraz is a chump? Of course you will. You've already started that theory when Alcaraz lost to Djokovic at the FO. As I said, you're all about coming
young and will mature by age and by losses but no one said he
won't lose to Djokovic again especially in three
sets.".
outplaying Djokovic/Nadal at age 35+ was a cripple according to you. Get out of here with that nonsense!So tell me now, how does this translate to your lie saying that IBecause you've outright stated multiple times that Djokovic has been losing to chumps. I guess Federer and Nadal are chumps in your mind? Oh I forgot, their losses to Djokovic don't count because Federer, who was making slam final after slam final and
said "Djokovic is more likely to lose to chump"?!
Honestly I thought you are capable of comprehending simpleProjection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
discussions, but it's either you are trolling or
incapable.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:is still out of him cos of him collapsing at the FO. You need to get over that Djoker could only beat old an retired bad-knee Fed and old injured one-footed Nadal, that's why Stan or Murray always gave him a great big beating anywhere important(Wimbledon
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:r
Projection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
PeteWasLucky has simply exposed your adulation for your new hero Djoker, you're a glory fan so are just supporting another #1 player as per usual! Pete's proven that this new gen of players(yet again) are totally useless except perhaps Carlos and jury
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 9:30:22PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote: > > Honestly I thought you are capable of comprehending simple > > discussions, but it's either you are trolling orsay? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.At least that would take his mind off his foot.
incapable.> Projection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better. > See how easy that was for me to
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote: > > Court_1 Wrote in message:r> > You used Djokovic's win against Alcaraz as evidence that age > > doesn't matter.> Isaid that the fact that a 16 years older Djokovic can still beat Alcaraz shows us that the six year age difference between Federer and Djokovic that you bleat on about constantly isn't that material.> > So I wondered saying "Why don't you say the same
On 4/09/2023 2:30 pm, Court_1 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:r
Honestly I thought you are capable of comprehending simple
discussions, but it's either you are trolling or
incapable.
Projection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
I think PWL has really lost it. If Fed played in different era to Novak/Nadal he can maybe convince himself Federer was better, but they played each other longer and more times than any other greats. He uses
that 1 match v Sampras at Wimbledon as an argument killer, but the
dozens of matches v Novak/Rafa are somehow less convincing - huh?
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:isn't the fact that Djokovic overtook two other goat players in Federer and Nadal the best evidence that he's a bit superior? Or do you consider Federer and Nadal average to poor players as well?
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:rI said that the fact that a 16 years older Djokovic can still beat Alcaraz shows us that the six year age difference between Federer and Djokovic that you bleat on about constantly isn't that material.
You used Djokovic's win against Alcaraz as evidence that age
doesn't matter.
So I wondered saying "Why don't you say the same when Djokovic
beats all the other younger players?
Simply because they aren't great players, correct?".
I simply asked why you didn't use "all other younger players thatSo there you go! You're admitting that Djokovic only beats chumps then? Why don't you answer my question to you: Are players like Nishikori, Raonic, Baghdatis, Gonzalez, etc. better players than Tsitsipas, Medvedev, Zverev in your estimation? Also,
get beaten by djokovic as well" as evidence that age isn't a
factor the same way you did with Alcaraz. Then I answered it for
you saying it's because they aren't great players like
Alcaraz.
up with any desperate theory to keep your idol as the mythical goat despite so much evidence that shows otherwise.Then I asserted what I said before when I said "Alcaraz is stillBut what if Djokovic continues to beat him in best of five like he did at the FO? Will you then say Alcaraz is a chump? Of course you will. You've already started that theory when Alcaraz lost to Djokovic at the FO. As I said, you're all about coming
young and will mature by age and by losses but no one said he
won't lose to Djokovic again especially in three
sets.".
and outplaying Djokovic/Nadal at age 35+ was a cripple according to you. Get out of here with that nonsense!So tell me now, how does this translate to your lie saying that IBecause you've outright stated multiple times that Djokovic has been losing to chumps. I guess Federer and Nadal are chumps in your mind? Oh I forgot, their losses to Djokovic don't count because Federer, who was making slam final after slam final
said "Djokovic is more likely to lose to chump"?!
is still out of him cos of him collapsing at the FO. You need to get over that Djoker could only beat old an retired bad-knee Fed and old injured one-footed Nadal, that's why Stan or Murray always gave him a great big beating anywhere important(WimbledonHonestly I thought you are capable of comprehending simpleProjection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
discussions, but it's either you are trolling or
incapable.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
PeteWasLucky has simply exposed your adulation for your new hero Djoker, you're a glory fan so are just supporting another #1 player as per usual! Pete's proven that this new gen of players(yet again) are totally useless except perhaps Carlos and jury
The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rI said that the fact that a 16 years older Djokovic can still beat Alcaraz shows us that the six year age difference between Federer and Djokovic that you bleat on about constantly isn't that material.> > So I wondered saying "Why don't you say the same
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote: > > Court_1 Wrote in message:r> > You used Djokovic's win against Alcaraz as evidence that age > > doesn't matter.>
Good post Ice. Court1 believes when she fully abandons a state of mind to switch to another state of mind and in the process she criticizes who didn't exhibit the same bipolar moody swings, that she becomes the smartest of the pack.
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:53:23 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:jury is still out of him cos of him collapsing at the FO. You need to get over that Djoker could only beat old an retired bad-knee Fed and old injured one-footed Nadal, that's why Stan or Murray always gave him a great big beating anywhere important(
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:rProjection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
PeteWasLucky has simply exposed your adulation for your new hero Djoker, you're a glory fan so are just supporting another #1 player as per usual! Pete's proven that this new gen of players(yet again) are totally useless except perhaps Carlos and
Good post, Ice! :))
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 10:12:37 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:jury is still out of him cos of him collapsing at the FO. You need to get over that Djoker could only beat old an retired bad-knee Fed and old injured one-footed Nadal, that's why Stan or Murray always gave him a great big beating anywhere important(
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:53:23 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:rProjection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
PeteWasLucky has simply exposed your adulation for your new hero Djoker, you're a glory fan so are just supporting another #1 player as per usual! Pete's proven that this new gen of players(yet again) are totally useless except perhaps Carlos and
Good post, Ice! :))
Oh, give me a break, Gracchus! Don't become some sycophant. Surely, you know what I'm saying is the truth unlike some braindead worshipper.
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:51:09 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:jury is still out of him cos of him collapsing at the FO. You need to get over that Djoker could only beat old an retired bad-knee Fed and old injured one-footed Nadal, that's why Stan or Murray always gave him a great big beating anywhere important(
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 10:12:37 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:53:23 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:rProjection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
PeteWasLucky has simply exposed your adulation for your new hero Djoker, you're a glory fan so are just supporting another #1 player as per usual! Pete's proven that this new gen of players(yet again) are totally useless except perhaps Carlos and
"I love Federer, but he sucks. I hate Novak, but he's a god." Yes, thank you. I think we've got it now.Good post, Ice! :))
Oh, give me a break, Gracchus! Don't become some sycophant. Surely, you know what I'm saying is the truth unlike some braindead worshipper.You've been beating a dead horse for weeks or maybe months because for some reason you feel you have to go above and beyond...and beyond...and beyond with this "debate" in order to prove you are supposedly a level-headed tennis fan without allegiances.
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:58:38PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > > On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4,PeteWasLucky wrote: > > Court_1 Wrote in message:r> > You used Djokovic's win against Alcaraz as evidence that age > > doesn't matter.> I said that the fact that a 16 years older Djokovic can still beat Alcaraz shows us that the six year age difference
I simply asked why you didn't use "all other younger players that > > get beaten by djokovic as well" as evidence that age isn't a > > factor the same way you did with Alcaraz. Then I answered it for > > you saying it's because they aren't greatplayers like > > Alcaraz.> So there you go! You're admitting that Djokovic only beats chumps then? Why don't you answer my question to you: Are players like Nishikori, Raonic, Baghdatis, Gonzalez, etc. better players than Tsitsipas, Medvedev, Zverev in
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:58:17 PM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:and jury is still out of him cos of him collapsing at the FO. You need to get over that Djoker could only beat old an retired bad-knee Fed and old injured one-footed Nadal, that's why Stan or Murray always gave him a great big beating anywhere important(
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:51:09 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 10:12:37 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:53:23 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:rProjection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
PeteWasLucky has simply exposed your adulation for your new hero Djoker, you're a glory fan so are just supporting another #1 player as per usual! Pete's proven that this new gen of players(yet again) are totally useless except perhaps Carlos
allegiances. "I love Federer, but he sucks. I hate Novak, but he's a god." Yes, thank you. I think we've got it now.Good post, Ice! :))
Oh, give me a break, Gracchus! Don't become some sycophant. Surely, you know what I'm saying is the truth unlike some braindead worshipper.You've been beating a dead horse for weeks or maybe months because for some reason you feel you have to go above and beyond...and beyond...and beyond with this "debate" in order to prove you are supposedly a level-headed tennis fan without
It's only a dead horse for you because the player you prefer is on the losing end and somehow you can't bring yourself to fully admit that.
Djokovic is still playing which means there are more records for him to go for and more ways for him to improve his legacy. So, nothing is dead about it. If he > were retired, then it would be beating a dead horse. The Djokovic-Alcaraz match-up isvery much alive and I for one am curious to see how it all works out.
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:51:09 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:jury is still out of him cos of him collapsing at the FO. You need to get over that Djoker could only beat old an retired bad-knee Fed and old injured one-footed Nadal, that's why Stan or Murray always gave him a great big beating anywhere important(
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 10:12:37 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:53:23 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote: >>>>>> Court_1 Wrote in message:r
Projection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
PeteWasLucky has simply exposed your adulation for your new hero Djoker, you're a glory fan so are just supporting another #1 player as per usual! Pete's proven that this new gen of players(yet again) are totally useless except perhaps Carlos and
"I love Federer, but he sucks. I hate Novak, but he's a god." Yes, thank you. I think we've got it now.Good post, Ice! :))
Oh, give me a break, Gracchus! Don't become some sycophant. Surely, you know what I'm saying is the truth unlike some braindead worshipper.
You've been beating a dead horse for weeks or maybe months because for some reason you feel you have to go above and beyond...and beyond...and beyond with this "debate" in order to prove you are supposedly a level-headed tennis fan without allegiances.
On 5/09/2023 7:58 am, Gracchus wrote:jury is still out of him cos of him collapsing at the FO. You need to get over that Djoker could only beat old an retired bad-knee Fed and old injured one-footed Nadal, that's why Stan or Murray always gave him a great big beating anywhere important(
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:51:09 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 10:12:37 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:53:23 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: >>>> On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:rProjection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
PeteWasLucky has simply exposed your adulation for your new hero Djoker, you're a glory fan so are just supporting another #1 player as per usual! Pete's proven that this new gen of players(yet again) are totally useless except perhaps Carlos and
allegiances. "I love Federer, but he sucks. I hate Novak, but he's a god." Yes, thank you. I think we've got it now.Good post, Ice! :))
Oh, give me a break, Gracchus! Don't become some sycophant. Surely, you know what I'm saying is the truth unlike some braindead worshipper.
You've been beating a dead horse for weeks or maybe months because for some reason you feel you have to go above and beyond...and beyond...and beyond with this "debate" in order to prove you are supposedly a level-headed tennis fan without
Well Roger did suck, relatively speaking, v Nadal/Novak. A true bona
fide goat would have beaten them both a lot more than he did. He's
still amongst the greats forever, but nobody really sees him as 'the' greatest and best ever.
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 4:44:59 AM UTC-7, Whisper wrote:> On 5/09/2023 7:58 am, Gracchus wrote: > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:51:09 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote: > >> On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 10:12:37 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote: >message:r > >>>>> Projection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better. > >>> > >>>>> See how easy that
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:53:23 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: > >>>> On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote: > >>>>>> Court_1 Wrote in
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 3:05:01 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:championship points against Djokovic because he was hampered by age.
It's only a dead horse for you because the player you prefer is on the losing end and somehow you can't bring yourself to fully admit that.Am I launching arguments to the contrary? I've mostly stayed out of this thing because it's a bore. All I've said is the idea that Federer kept getting better and better even from 30 to 40 is false. But you don't see me claiming he blew multiple
very much alive and I for one am curious to see how it all works out.Djokovic is still playing which means there are more records for him to go for and more ways for him to improve his legacy. So, nothing is dead about it. If he > were retired, then it would be beating a dead horse. The Djokovic-Alcaraz match-up is
But Federer *is* retired and Djokovic passed him in achievements. That makes this particular argument a dead horse.
Djokovic-Alcaraz is a whole other pony. ;)
Court_1 <olymp...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:rPeteWasLucky wrote: > > Court_1 Wrote in message:r> > You used Djokovic's win against Alcaraz as evidence that age > > doesn't matter.> I said that the fact that a 16 years older Djokovic can still beat Alcaraz shows us that the six year age difference
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:58:38 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:> The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > > On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:> On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4,
I simply asked why you didn't use "all other younger players that > > get beaten by djokovic as well" as evidence that age isn't a > > factor the same way you did with Alcaraz. Then I answered it for > > you saying it's because they aren't greatplayers like > > Alcaraz.> So there you go! You're admitting that Djokovic only beats chumps then? Why don't you answer my question to you: Are players like Nishikori, Raonic, Baghdatis, Gonzalez, etc. better players than Tsitsipas, Medvedev, Zverev in
Does calling me Federer's worshipper make you feel great and victorious?
Try to address the points in the discussion instead of opting to call me Fed worshipper, Bangali, etc. Every time you do this you are proving you are incapable of staying on topic and having normal discussion.
On 5/09/2023 7:58 am, Gracchus wrote:jury is still out of him cos of him collapsing at the FO. You need to get over that Djoker could only beat old an retired bad-knee Fed and old injured one-footed Nadal, that's why Stan or Murray always gave him a great big beating anywhere important(
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:51:09 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 10:12:37 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:53:23 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: >>>> On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 05:30:22 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 11:23:27 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
Court_1 Wrote in message:rProjection again? I'm not the one coming up with inane theories to keep Federer as some mythical God. All the evidence I see is telling me that he lost the race to Djokovic as Djokovic is a bit better.
See how easy that was for me to say? You'll never get there though. You'd rather cut off your own testicle than admit it. So weird.
PeteWasLucky has simply exposed your adulation for your new hero Djoker, you're a glory fan so are just supporting another #1 player as per usual! Pete's proven that this new gen of players(yet again) are totally useless except perhaps Carlos and
allegiances. "I love Federer, but he sucks. I hate Novak, but he's a god." Yes, thank you. I think we've got it now.Good post, Ice! :))
Oh, give me a break, Gracchus! Don't become some sycophant. Surely, you know what I'm saying is the truth unlike some braindead worshipper.
You've been beating a dead horse for weeks or maybe months because for some reason you feel you have to go above and beyond...and beyond...and beyond with this "debate" in order to prove you are supposedly a level-headed tennis fan without
Well Roger did suck, relatively speaking, v Nadal/Novak. A true bona
fide goat would have beaten them both a lot more than he did. He's
still amongst the greats forever, but nobody really sees him as 'the' greatest and best ever.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 118:34:34 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,306 |