• Re: Taylor Fritz might be ticked off!

    From gapp111@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 26 22:47:27 2023
    On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 1:29:25 AM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:
    Taylor might be pissed off right now. He lost in the 3rd round at this
    years Wimbledon to a (pretty much admitted doping) player:

    https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/38258319/mikael-ymer-retires-failing-overturn-doping-suspension

    Hope Taylor uses this as added motivation!
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    Cant trust the nigruh?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scall5@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 27 00:29:22 2023
    Taylor might be pissed off right now. He lost in the 3rd round at this
    years Wimbledon to a (pretty much admitted doping) player:

    https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/38258319/mikael-ymer-retires-failing-overturn-doping-suspension

    Hope Taylor uses this as added motivation!
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sawfish@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 27 09:21:06 2023
    On 8/26/23 10:29 PM, Scall5 wrote:
    Taylor might be pissed off right now. He lost in the 3rd round at this
    years Wimbledon to a (pretty much admitted doping) player:

    https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/38258319/mikael-ymer-retires-failing-overturn-doping-suspension


    Hope Taylor uses this as added motivation!

    Yes, it should encourage him to consider doping, himself.

    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "The world's truth constitutes a vision so terrifying as to beggar the prophecies of the bleakest seer who ever walked it."
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From grif@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 27 21:31:33 2023
    On 27/08/2023 06:29, Scall5 wrote:
    Taylor might be pissed off right now. He lost in the 3rd round at this years Wimbledon to a (pretty much admitted doping) player:

    https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/38258319/mikael-ymer-retires-failing-overturn-doping-suspension

    Hope Taylor uses this as added motivation!

    https://www.atptour.com/en/players/atp-head-2-head/carlos-alcaraz-vs-mikael-ymer/A0E2/Y268

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 27 16:14:25 2023
    On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 1:29:25 AM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:
    Taylor might be pissed off right now. He lost in the 3rd round at this
    years Wimbledon to a (pretty much admitted doping) player:

    https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/38258319/mikael-ymer-retires-failing-overturn-doping-suspension

    Hope Taylor uses this as added motivation!

    :)
    Fritz is a top ten player. The idea that he needs "motivation" to consider juicing is fanciful IMO. That ship has sailed. Long ago.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scall5@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 27 20:19:30 2023
    On 8/27/2023 6:14 PM, Court_1 wrote:
    On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 1:29:25 AM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:
    Taylor might be pissed off right now. He lost in the 3rd round at this
    years Wimbledon to a (pretty much admitted doping) player:

    https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/38258319/mikael-ymer-retires-failing-overturn-doping-suspension

    Hope Taylor uses this as added motivation!

    :)
    Fritz is a top ten player. The idea that he needs "motivation" to consider juicing is fanciful IMO. That ship has sailed. Long ago.

    What I meant by the post was that Fritz lost a 5 set match at Wimbledon,
    in the second round, to a player who was doping. I personally wouldn't
    be too happy about that.
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 27 21:02:27 2023
    On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 9:19:32 PM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:
    On 8/27/2023 6:14 PM, Court_1 wrote:
    On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 1:29:25 AM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:
    Taylor might be pissed off right now. He lost in the 3rd round at this
    years Wimbledon to a (pretty much admitted doping) player:

    https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/38258319/mikael-ymer-retires-failing-overturn-doping-suspension

    Hope Taylor uses this as added motivation!

    :)
    Fritz is a top ten player. The idea that he needs "motivation" to consider juicing is fanciful IMO. That ship has sailed. Long ago.
    What I meant by the post was that Fritz lost a 5 set match at Wimbledon,
    in the second round, to a player who was doping. I personally wouldn't
    be too happy about that.
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    Yes, I know what you meant. But, IMO all top players dope so I doubt Fritz would be too bothered. Fritz would likely be thinking," boy, what a dummy to get caught."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scall5@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 28 20:02:58 2023
    On 8/27/2023 11:02 PM, Court_1 wrote:
    On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 9:19:32 PM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:
    On 8/27/2023 6:14 PM, Court_1 wrote:
    On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 1:29:25 AM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:
    Taylor might be pissed off right now. He lost in the 3rd round at this >>>> years Wimbledon to a (pretty much admitted doping) player:

    https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/38258319/mikael-ymer-retires-failing-overturn-doping-suspension

    Hope Taylor uses this as added motivation!

    :)
    Fritz is a top ten player. The idea that he needs "motivation" to consider juicing is fanciful IMO. That ship has sailed. Long ago.
    What I meant by the post was that Fritz lost a 5 set match at Wimbledon,
    in the second round, to a player who was doping. I personally wouldn't
    be too happy about that.
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    Yes, I know what you meant. But, IMO all top players dope so I doubt Fritz would be too bothered. Fritz would likely be thinking," boy, what a dummy to get caught."

    Yeah, you have stated that before ("IMO all top players dope"). Could
    that be why Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic have stayed at the top for so
    long? I have no idea.

    Personally I don't think many players dope at the extent that you
    believe. They can be called to give a piss sample within something like
    2-3 hours. That isn't enough time to mask one's urine, from what little
    I know.

    One last thought: Agassi, in his tell-all autobiography, mentioned doing
    meth. However, I don't recall reading that he did illegal performance
    enhancing drugs/injections. If Agassi was honest about meth, why would
    he not state doing enhancement drugs? He even took a lot of flack after
    his book hit the stores that his meth use and non-suspension hurt
    tennis, yet he went on talk shows and said that if he was going to write
    a 'tell-all' book why lie about anything (including his wig at his first
    grand slam final - Roland Garros).
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gracchus@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 28 18:22:31 2023
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 6:03:04 PM UTC-7, Scall5 wrote:
    On 8/27/2023 11:02 PM, Court_1 wrote:

    Yes, I know what you meant. But, IMO all top players dope so I doubt Fritz would be too bothered. Fritz would likely be thinking," boy, what a dummy to get caught."

    Yeah, you have stated that before ("IMO all top players dope"). Could
    that be why Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic have stayed at the top for so
    long? I have no idea.

    Personally I don't think many players dope at the extent that you
    believe. They can be called to give a piss sample within something like
    2-3 hours. That isn't enough time to mask one's urine, from what little
    I know.

    One last thought: Agassi, in his tell-all autobiography, mentioned doing meth. However, I don't recall reading that he did illegal performance enhancing drugs/injections. If Agassi was honest about meth, why would
    he not state doing enhancement drugs? He even took a lot of flack after
    his book hit the stores that his meth use and non-suspension hurt
    tennis, yet he went on talk shows and said that if he was going to write
    a 'tell-all' book why lie about anything (including his wig at his first grand slam final - Roland Garros).

    I can think of a very good reason. Meth and his wig are embarrassments. Admitting PED use would invalidate all his titles.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 28 19:32:46 2023
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:03:04 PM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:

    Personally I don't think many players dope at the extent that you
    believe. They can be called to give a piss sample within something like
    2-3 hours. That isn't enough time to mask one's urine, from what little
    I know.

    The top players have experts on their teams who know how to mask things. The whole system is set up to NOT catch top players for the most part. The top players who have been "caught" must have pissed some important people off or they're just not that
    important to the tennis business(i.e. Cilic.)


    One last thought: Agassi, in his tell-all autobiography, mentioned doing meth. However, I don't recall reading that he did illegal performance enhancing drugs/injections. If Agassi was honest about meth, why would
    he not state doing enhancement drugs? He even took a lot of flack after
    his book hit the stores that his meth use and non-suspension hurt
    tennis, yet he went on talk shows and said that if he was going to write
    a 'tell-all' book why lie about anything (including his wig at his first grand slam final - Roland Garros).

    You think he really told "all" in that book? There's an honor system amongst pro athletes whereby they don't talk about PED use. I'll stand by what I said that every top player dopes. Have you actually watched Nadal, Federer, Djokovic in their mid to
    late 30s play? How any fan thinks they're drug free is laughable and miraculous to me. I just don't get it. It's so damn obvious. Remember, Agassi did say in his book that he failed a drug test and it was swept under the rug. He admitted to that long
    after he was retired.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to Gracchus on Mon Aug 28 19:34:59 2023
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:22:34 PM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 6:03:04 PM UTC-7, Scall5 wrote:
    On 8/27/2023 11:02 PM, Court_1 wrote:

    Yes, I know what you meant. But, IMO all top players dope so I doubt Fritz would be too bothered. Fritz would likely be thinking," boy, what a dummy to get caught."

    Yeah, you have stated that before ("IMO all top players dope"). Could
    that be why Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic have stayed at the top for so long? I have no idea.

    Personally I don't think many players dope at the extent that you
    believe. They can be called to give a piss sample within something like 2-3 hours. That isn't enough time to mask one's urine, from what little
    I know.

    One last thought: Agassi, in his tell-all autobiography, mentioned doing meth. However, I don't recall reading that he did illegal performance enhancing drugs/injections. If Agassi was honest about meth, why would
    he not state doing enhancement drugs? He even took a lot of flack after his book hit the stores that his meth use and non-suspension hurt
    tennis, yet he went on talk shows and said that if he was going to write
    a 'tell-all' book why lie about anything (including his wig at his first grand slam final - Roland Garros).

    I can think of a very good reason. Meth and his wig are embarrassments. Admitting PED use would invalidate all his titles.

    Yes, admitting he used meth and failed a drug test is one thing; admitting PED use is a whole different ball game with much greater ramifications.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to olympia0000@yahoo.com on Tue Aug 29 13:10:54 2023
    Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com> wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:03:04 PM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:

    Personally I don't think many players dope at the extent that you
    believe. They can be called to give a piss sample within something like
    2-3 hours. That isn't enough time to mask one's urine, from what little
    I know.

    The top players have experts on their teams who know how to mask things. The whole system is set up to NOT catch top players for the most part. The top players who have been "caught" must have pissed some important people off or they're just not that
    important to the tennis business(i.e. Cilic.)


    One last thought: Agassi, in his tell-all autobiography, mentioned doing
    meth. However, I don't recall reading that he did illegal performance
    enhancing drugs/injections. If Agassi was honest about meth, why would
    he not state doing enhancement drugs? He even took a lot of flack after
    his book hit the stores that his meth use and non-suspension hurt
    tennis, yet he went on talk shows and said that if he was going to write
    a 'tell-all' book why lie about anything (including his wig at his first
    grand slam final - Roland Garros).

    You think he really told "all" in that book? There's an honor system amongst pro athletes whereby they don't talk about PED use. I'll stand by what I said that every top player dopes. Have you actually watched Nadal, Federer, Djokovic in their mid to
    late 30s play? How any fan thinks they're drug free is laughable and miraculous to me. I just don't get it. It's so damn obvious. Remember, Agassi did say in his book that he failed a drug test and it was swept under the rug. He admitted to that long
    after he was retired.

    I have to be a realist and admit that doping is very prevalent
    in professional tennis:

    https://www.express.co.uk/sport/tennis/1703897/ATP-top-100-Fernando-Verdasco-doping-ban-tennis-news

    It is also easy to do. You just pretend to have ADHD and doctors
    in the USA will prescribe amphetamine-based medication for you. The
    added bonus is that this is your private, personal illness that
    you do not have to disclose to anybody. When you get a proper
    dose, the "speed" you use will make you more alert, mentally
    focused and also gives you quicker reflexes.

    After having been "diagnosed" with ADHD, you only notify
    ITF and ATP that you have a legal right to use amphetamine-based
    medication. When you are doping tested, nobody can blame you
    for having medication for your illness!

    I have heard that using "speed" has been common in pro tennis
    circles at least from the 1970s.

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 29 10:00:43 2023
    On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 03:35:01 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:22:34 PM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 6:03:04 PM UTC-7, Scall5 wrote:
    On 8/27/2023 11:02 PM, Court_1 wrote:

    Yes, I know what you meant. But, IMO all top players dope so I doubt Fritz would be too bothered. Fritz would likely be thinking," boy, what a dummy to get caught."

    Yeah, you have stated that before ("IMO all top players dope"). Could that be why Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic have stayed at the top for so long? I have no idea.

    Personally I don't think many players dope at the extent that you believe. They can be called to give a piss sample within something like 2-3 hours. That isn't enough time to mask one's urine, from what little I know.

    One last thought: Agassi, in his tell-all autobiography, mentioned doing meth. However, I don't recall reading that he did illegal performance enhancing drugs/injections. If Agassi was honest about meth, why would he not state doing enhancement drugs? He even took a lot of flack after his book hit the stores that his meth use and non-suspension hurt tennis, yet he went on talk shows and said that if he was going to write a 'tell-all' book why lie about anything (including his wig at his first grand slam final - Roland Garros).

    I can think of a very good reason. Meth and his wig are embarrassments. Admitting PED use would invalidate all his titles.
    Yes, admitting he used meth and failed a drug test is one thing; admitting PED use is a whole different ball game with much greater ramifications.

    this is hilarious, you and Gracchus are such silly conspiracy theorists, quit defaming good players.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Iceberg@21:1/5 to Kalevi Kolttonen on Tue Aug 29 10:05:28 2023
    On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 14:10:58 UTC+1, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    Court_1 <olymp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:03:04 PM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:

    Personally I don't think many players dope at the extent that you
    believe. They can be called to give a piss sample within something like >> 2-3 hours. That isn't enough time to mask one's urine, from what little >> I know.

    The top players have experts on their teams who know how to mask things. The whole system is set up to NOT catch top players for the most part. The top players who have been "caught" must have pissed some important people off or they're just not that
    important to the tennis business(i.e. Cilic.)


    One last thought: Agassi, in his tell-all autobiography, mentioned doing >> meth. However, I don't recall reading that he did illegal performance
    enhancing drugs/injections. If Agassi was honest about meth, why would
    he not state doing enhancement drugs? He even took a lot of flack after >> his book hit the stores that his meth use and non-suspension hurt
    tennis, yet he went on talk shows and said that if he was going to write >> a 'tell-all' book why lie about anything (including his wig at his first >> grand slam final - Roland Garros).

    You think he really told "all" in that book? There's an honor system amongst pro athletes whereby they don't talk about PED use. I'll stand by what I said that every top player dopes. Have you actually watched Nadal, Federer, Djokovic in their mid to
    late 30s play? How any fan thinks they're drug free is laughable and miraculous to me. I just don't get it. It's so damn obvious. Remember, Agassi did say in his book that he failed a drug test and it was swept under the rug. He admitted to that long
    after he was retired.
    I have to be a realist and admit that doping is very prevalent
    in professional tennis:

    no, it's not and you shouldn't be allowed to say it is either.

    https://www.express.co.uk/sport/tennis/1703897/ATP-top-100-Fernando-Verdasco-doping-ban-tennis-news

    It is also easy to do. You just pretend to have ADHD and doctors
    in the USA will prescribe amphetamine-based medication for you. The
    added bonus is that this is your private, personal illness that
    you do not have to disclose to anybody. When you get a proper
    dose, the "speed" you use will make you more alert, mentally
    focused and also gives you quicker reflexes.

    After having been "diagnosed" with ADHD, you only notify
    ITF and ATP that you have a legal right to use amphetamine-based
    medication. When you are doping tested, nobody can blame you
    for having medication for your illness!

    these are exception theraputic usage, they get granted in every sport and are totally documented.

    I have heard that using "speed" has been common in pro tennis
    circles at least from the 1970s.

    that's ancient history, try using speed in a modern tennis game! Look at drunken Serena at Wimbledon a few years ago. Why are you so obsessed with silly conspiracy theories? you think the WADA any-doping folks who outed Lance Armstrong and re-wrote
    cycling would put up with tennis, the players even have bio passports these days.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Tue Aug 29 17:56:16 2023
    The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 14:10:58 UTC+1, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    Court_1 <olymp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
    On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 9:03:04 PM UTC-4, Scall5 wrote:

    Personally I don't think many players dope at the extent that you
    believe. They can be called to give a piss sample within something like >> >> 2-3 hours. That isn't enough time to mask one's urine, from what little >> >> I know.

    The top players have experts on their teams who know how to mask things. The whole system is set up to NOT catch top players for the most part. The top players who have been "caught" must have pissed some important people off or they're just not
    that important to the tennis business(i.e. Cilic.)


    One last thought: Agassi, in his tell-all autobiography, mentioned doing >> >> meth. However, I don't recall reading that he did illegal performance
    enhancing drugs/injections. If Agassi was honest about meth, why would
    he not state doing enhancement drugs? He even took a lot of flack after >> >> his book hit the stores that his meth use and non-suspension hurt
    tennis, yet he went on talk shows and said that if he was going to write >> >> a 'tell-all' book why lie about anything (including his wig at his first >> >> grand slam final - Roland Garros).

    You think he really told "all" in that book? There's an honor system amongst pro athletes whereby they don't talk about PED use. I'll stand by what I said that every top player dopes. Have you actually watched Nadal, Federer, Djokovic in their mid
    to late 30s play? How any fan thinks they're drug free is laughable and miraculous to me. I just don't get it. It's so damn obvious. Remember, Agassi did say in his book that he failed a drug test and it was swept under the rug. He admitted to that long
    after he was retired.
    I have to be a realist and admit that doping is very prevalent
    in professional tennis:

    no, it's not and you shouldn't be allowed to say it is either.

    https://www.express.co.uk/sport/tennis/1703897/ATP-top-100-Fernando-Verdasco-doping-ban-tennis-news

    It is also easy to do. You just pretend to have ADHD and doctors
    in the USA will prescribe amphetamine-based medication for you. The
    added bonus is that this is your private, personal illness that
    you do not have to disclose to anybody. When you get a proper
    dose, the "speed" you use will make you more alert, mentally
    focused and also gives you quicker reflexes.

    After having been "diagnosed" with ADHD, you only notify
    ITF and ATP that you have a legal right to use amphetamine-based
    medication. When you are doping tested, nobody can blame you
    for having medication for your illness!

    these are exception theraputic usage, they get granted in every sport and are totally documented.

    I have heard that using "speed" has been common in pro tennis
    circles at least from the 1970s.

    that's ancient history, try using speed in a modern tennis game! Look at drunken Serena at Wimbledon a few years ago. Why are you so obsessed with silly conspiracy theories? you think the WADA any-doping folks who outed Lance Armstrong and re-wrote
    cycling would put up with tennis, the players even have bio passports these days.

    I guess you did not understand anything. Tennis players fake ADHD
    symptoms and get Adderal prescriptions. Adderal is nothing but one
    form of amphetamine. It is "speed" of a kind. Using a proper
    dosage of this chemical, it helps players immensely. You get
    better concentration and faster reflexes, just to name a few
    benefits.

    Fighter pilots are also commonly given amphetamine to aid their
    accuracy and concentration.

    I respect court_1's courage to speak out the truth. Our tennis
    heroes are indeed using doping, but I don't care because it
    is so common. There is nothing we can do to stop it.

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to The Iceberg on Tue Aug 29 17:01:41 2023
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 1:05:30 PM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:

    no, it's not and you shouldn't be allowed to say it is either.

    Sit down, baboon! Just because you're senseless, that's not my problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to Kalevi Kolttonen on Tue Aug 29 16:59:43 2023
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 1:56:19 PM UTC-4, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    The Iceberg <iceber...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Why are you so obsessed with silly conspiracy theories? you think the WADA any-doping folks who outed Lance Armstrong and re-wrote cycling would put up with tennis, the players even have bio passports these days.

    I guess you did not understand anything.

    Well, there you go! That's Iceberg in a nutshell. I don't call him baboon for nothing.

    The elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor with him! :) Better to learn that and not waste too much time in heavy discourse with him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gapp111@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 29 17:24:52 2023
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 8:01:44 PM UTC-4, Court_1 wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 1:05:30 PM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:

    no, it's not and you shouldn't be allowed to say it is either.
    Sit down, baboon! Just because you're senseless, that's not my problem.

    Seriuosly? However, baboons are known to be intelligent animals with advanced problem-solving skills and social behaviors.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Court_1@21:1/5 to gap... on Tue Aug 29 17:32:01 2023
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 8:24:54 PM UTC-4, gap... wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 8:01:44 PM UTC-4, Court_1 wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 1:05:30 PM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:

    no, it's not and you shouldn't be allowed to say it is either.
    Sit down, baboon! Just because you're senseless, that's not my problem.

    Seriuosly? However, baboons are known to be intelligent animals with advanced problem-solving skills and social behaviors.

    The point is that Iceberg is supposed to be a human being, right? Baboons aren't as intelligent as human beings and hence why I chose that moniker for him. Subpar human intelligence. Have you read his comments over the years on just about every subject?
    Constant drivel IMO. You'd think he was trolling but I don't think so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)