• Re: Alcaraz could end up vulturing the weakest era ever and win 30 slam

    From =?UTF-8?Q?Pelle_Svansl=c3=b6s?=@21:1/5 to Ocean Naught on Tue Jul 11 21:15:03 2023
    On 11.7.2023 20.34, Ocean Naught wrote:
    No djoke!

    Definitely not. Somewhere between 30 and 40 is entirely doable.

    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MBDunc@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 11 11:27:02 2023
    On Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 9:15:06 PM UTC+3, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
    On 11.7.2023 20.34, Ocean Naught wrote:
    No djoke!

    Definitely not. Somewhere between 30 and 40 is entirely doable.

    20y from now: 50 and 60 is entirely doable.

    Nah. Pelle got the point.

    Fed-Nadal-Djoker era is special not likely to repeat. (see golf: Nicklaus - Player - Palmer -era never repeated on tour and actually it was about a decade short compared to Fed-Nadal-Djoker)

    It is not about their absolute play quality .... but just longevity and sustainability (look how Mac/Borg/Wilander/Becker/Agassi had all the distractions affecting their - not just play but entire seasons and career)

    How Djoker/Nadal/Fed time after time still kept going even after most crushing career defining defeats imaginable? Add today's social media basebars?

    That saying: better tennis will be, but more sustainable?

    .mikko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to pelle@svans.los on Tue Jul 11 18:24:32 2023
    Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los> wrote:
    On 11.7.2023 20.34, Ocean Naught wrote:
    No djoke!

    Definitely not. Somewhere between 30 and 40 is entirely doable.

    No way. That is just ridiculous.

    Alcaraz is one of my bigbest favourites, but it is very
    unlikely that he will even win the 20 GS singles titles
    like Federer did.

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)