*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PM

If Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.



ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:51:41 PM

Based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:

1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.

2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by
players and fans alike.

3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a
difficult environment for players to compete in.

It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.


--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r

*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PMIf Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:51:41 PMBased on public perception, player

interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the
year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the
surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by players and fans alike.3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid
conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a difficult environment for players to compete in.It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on
individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.
html





*skriptis: 6/20/2023, 3:56:55 PM

Is perhaps French Open second most valuable due to unique surface?



ChatGPT: 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PM

Yes, the French Open is often considered the second most valuable Grand Slam tournament due to its unique surface. Unlike the other three Grand Slam tournaments, which are played on hard courts or grass courts, the French Open is played on clay courts.
Clay court tennis requires a different set of skills and strategies than other surfaces, such as the ability to slide and move effectively on the surface and the ability to construct points in a way that takes advantage of the slower court speed.

Winning the French Open is considered a significant achievement in tennis, as it requires a player to be able to adapt their game to the unique demands of the surface. Additionally, the French Open is often viewed as a test of a player's mental toughness,
as the long rallies and slower court speed can make it a physically and mentally demanding tournament.

Overall, the combination of the unique surface, the history and tradition of the tournament, and the challenges it presents to players make the French Open a highly valued event in the tennis world.



*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:57:32 PM

So what's the value of French Open if Wimbledon is 7 pts



ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PM

As mentioned earlier, based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the French Open is generally considered to be worth 6 points in comparison to the Wimbledon title. This is due to the unique challenges and demands of the clay court
surface, as well as the history and tradition of the tournament.

However, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the French Open more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal preferences, the
performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each Grand Slam tournament is determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.




--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PMIf Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023,

3:51:41 PMBased on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament
is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be
challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by players and fans alike.3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically
demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a difficult environment for players to compete in.It's important to note that these
point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html*skriptis: 6/20/2023, 3:56:55 PMIs perhaps French Open second most valuable due to unique surface?ChatGPT: 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PMYes, the French Open is often considered the second most valuable
Grand Slam tournament due to its unique surface. Unlike the other three Grand Slam tournaments, which are played on hard courts or grass courts, the French Open is played on clay courts. Clay court tennis requires a different set of skills and strategies
than other surfaces, such as the ability to slide and move effectively on the surface and the ability to construct points in a way that takes advantage of the slower court speed.Winning the French Open is considered a significant achievement in tennis,
as it requires a player to be able to adapt their game to the unique demands of the surface. Additionally, the French Open is often viewed as a test of a player's mental toughness, as the long rallies and slower court speed can make it a physically and
mentally demanding tournament.Overall, the combination of the unique surface, the history and tradition of the tournament, and the challenges it presents to players make the French Open a highly valued event in the tennis world.*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:57:
32 PMSo what's the value of French Open if Wimbledon is 7 ptsChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PMAs mentioned earlier, based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the French Open is generally considered to be worth 6 points in comparison
to the Wimbledon title. This is due to the unique challenges and demands of the clay court surface, as well as the history and tradition of the tournament. However, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on
individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the French Open more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal preferences, the performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each Grand
Slam tournament is determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html




*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:01:26 PM

And what's the value of Olympics and ATP Finals if Wimbledon is worth 7 PTS and other grand slam tournaments are worth 6 PTS?


ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:01:39 PM

The value of the Olympics and ATP Finals can also be subjective and vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points values of the Olympics and ATP Finals are
generally considered to be:

1. Olympics: 4 PTS - The Olympics is a unique event that takes place every four years and is highly prestigious. However, it is not solely a tennis event, and many top players have skipped the tournament in the past due to scheduling conflicts or other
reasons. As a result, the Olympics is generally seen as being worth slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments.

2. ATP Finals: 5 PTS - The ATP Finals is the season-ending tournament for the top eight players in the world rankings. It is highly prestigious and is viewed as a major title in its own right. However, it is not a Grand Slam tournament, and some players
may prioritize the Grand Slam events over the ATP Finals. As a result, the ATP Finals is generally considered to be worth slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments, but more points than the Olympics.

Again, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the Olympics or the ATP Finals more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal
preferences, the performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each tournament is determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.




*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:04:49 PM

Are you sure about that? Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in best of 5 format and could be worth significantly less than grand slam tournaments.


ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:05:05 PM

You are correct that the fact that the Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in the best-of-five format can be a factor that reduces their value compared to the Grand Slam tournaments. The best-of-five format requires greater physical and mental stamina
and endurance, which is why winning a Grand Slam title is considered a significant achievement in tennis.

However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by the format of the matches. Other factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition, and the history and tradition of the tournament can also influence its value.

Based on these factors, many people still consider the Olympics and ATP Finals to be highly prestigious and valuable tournaments. For example, winning a gold medal at the Olympics is a significant achievement in any sport, and the ATP Finals features the
top eight players in the world and is considered one of the most prestigious tournaments in men's tennis.

Ultimately, the point values of different tournaments are subjective and can vary based on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points values of the Olympics and ATP Finals are
generally considered to be slightly lower than the Grand Slam tournaments, but still highly valuable and prestigious.



--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PMIf Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public

perception, players interviews and so on.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:51:41 PMBased on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the
Wimbledon title:1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique
in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by players and fans alike.3. US Open: 6 PTS - This
tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a difficult environment for
players to compete in.It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand
Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html*skriptis: 6/20/2023, 3:56:55 PMIs perhaps French Open second most valuable due to unique surface?ChatGPT: 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PMYes, the
French Open is often considered the second most valuable Grand Slam tournament due to its unique surface. Unlike the other three Grand Slam tournaments, which are played on hard courts or grass courts, the French Open is played on clay courts. Clay court
tennis requires a different set of skills and strategies than other surfaces, such as the ability to slide and move effectively on the surface and the ability to construct points in a way that takes advantage of the slower court speed.Winning the French
Open is considered a significant achievement in tennis, as it requires a player to be able to adapt their game to the unique demands of the surface. Additionally, the French Open is often viewed as a test of a player's mental toughness, as the long
rallies and slower court speed can make it a physically and mentally demanding tournament.Overall, the combination of the unique surface, the history and tradition of the tournament, and the challenges it presents to players make the French Open a highly
valued event in the tennis world.*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:57:32 PMSo what's the value of French Open if Wimbledon is 7 ptsChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PMAs mentioned earlier, based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the French Open
is generally considered to be worth 6 points in comparison to the Wimbledon title. This is due to the unique challenges and demands of the clay court surface, as well as the history and tradition of the tournament. However, it's important to note that
these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the French Open more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal preferences, the performance of their favorite
players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each Grand Slam tournament is determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://
piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:01:26 PMAnd what's the value of Olympics and ATP Finals if Wimbledon is worth 7 PTS and other grand slam tournaments are worth 6 PTS?ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:01:39 PMThe value of
the Olympics and ATP Finals can also be subjective and vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points values of the Olympics and ATP Finals are generally considered
to be:1. Olympics: 4 PTS - The Olympics is a unique event that takes place every four years and is highly prestigious. However, it is not solely a tennis event, and many top players have skipped the tournament in the past due to scheduling conflicts or
other reasons. As a result, the Olympics is generally seen as being worth slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments.2. ATP Finals: 5 PTS - The ATP Finals is the season-ending tournament for the top eight players in the world rankings. It is
highly prestigious and is viewed as a major title in its own right. However, it is not a Grand Slam tournament, and some players may prioritize the Grand Slam events over the ATP Finals. As a result, the ATP Finals is generally considered to be worth
slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments, but more points than the Olympics.Again, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the
Olympics or the ATP Finals more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal preferences, the performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each tournament is determined by a complex set of factors,
including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:04:49 PMAre you sure about that? Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in best of 5 format and could be worth significantly less than grand
slam tournaments.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:05:05 PMYou are correct that the fact that the Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in the best-of-five format can be a factor that reduces their value compared to the Grand Slam tournaments. The best-of-five
format requires greater physical and mental stamina and endurance, which is why winning a Grand Slam title is considered a significant achievement in tennis.However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by the format of the matches. Other
factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition, and the history and tradition of the tournament can also influence its value. Based on these factors, many people still consider the Olympics and ATP Finals to be highly prestigious and
valuable tournaments. For example, winning a gold medal at the Olympics is a significant achievement in any sport, and the ATP Finals features the top eight players in the world and is considered one of the most prestigious tournaments in men's tennis.
Ultimately, the point values of different tournaments are subjective and can vary based on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points values of the Olympics and ATP Finals are
generally considered to be slightly lower than the Grand Slam tournaments, but still highly valuable and prestigious.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html




*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:08:28 PM

And what's the value of ATP masters 1000 tournaments if Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, the other grand slam tournaments being worth 6 PTS, Olympics being 4 and ATP Finals being worth 5 PTS.


ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM

The ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are also highly prestigious events on the men's tennis calendar. These tournaments are played on hard courts and clay courts, and feature the top players in the world competing against each other in a series of nine
events throughout the year.

In terms of point values, the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are generally considered to be worth fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments, but more points than the Olympics and some other tournaments. Based on public perception and the opinions of
many players, the point value of the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments is generally considered to be:

3. ATP Masters 1000: 4 or 5 PTS - The point value of the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may consider them to be worth 4 points, while others may consider them to be worth 5 points.
However, they are generally considered to be highly valuable and prestigious tournaments, as they feature the top players in the world competing against each other in a series of events throughout the year.

Overall, the point values of different tournaments are subjective and can vary based on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are generally considered
to be highly valuable and prestigious events, but worth fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments.


--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PMIf Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of

other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:51:41 PMBased on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to
be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.
2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by
players and fans alike.3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds,
which can make it a difficult environment for players to compete in.It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are
commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html*skriptis: 6/20/2023, 3:56:55 PMIs perhaps French Open second most valuable due to unique
surface?ChatGPT: 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PMYes, the French Open is often considered the second most valuable Grand Slam tournament due to its unique surface. Unlike the other three Grand Slam tournaments, which are played on hard courts or grass courts, the
French Open is played on clay courts. Clay court tennis requires a different set of skills and strategies than other surfaces, such as the ability to slide and move effectively on the surface and the ability to construct points in a way that takes
advantage of the slower court speed.Winning the French Open is considered a significant achievement in tennis, as it requires a player to be able to adapt their game to the unique demands of the surface. Additionally, the French Open is often viewed as a
test of a player's mental toughness, as the long rallies and slower court speed can make it a physically and mentally demanding tournament.Overall, the combination of the unique surface, the history and tradition of the tournament, and the challenges it
presents to players make the French Open a highly valued event in the tennis world.*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:57:32 PMSo what's the value of French Open if Wimbledon is 7 ptsChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PMAs mentioned earlier, based on public perception,
player interviews, and other factors, the French Open is generally considered to be worth 6 points in comparison to the Wimbledon title. This is due to the unique challenges and demands of the clay court surface, as well as the history and tradition of
the tournament. However, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the French Open more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal
preferences, the performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each Grand Slam tournament is determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.
-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:01:26 PMAnd what's the value of Olympics and ATP Finals if Wimbledon is worth 7 PTS and other grand slam tournaments are worth 6 PTS?
ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:01:39 PMThe value of the Olympics and ATP Finals can also be subjective and vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points values of the
Olympics and ATP Finals are generally considered to be:1. Olympics: 4 PTS - The Olympics is a unique event that takes place every four years and is highly prestigious. However, it is not solely a tennis event, and many top players have skipped the
tournament in the past due to scheduling conflicts or other reasons. As a result, the Olympics is generally seen as being worth slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments.2. ATP Finals: 5 PTS - The ATP Finals is the season-ending tournament
for the top eight players in the world rankings. It is highly prestigious and is viewed as a major title in its own right. However, it is not a Grand Slam tournament, and some players may prioritize the Grand Slam events over the ATP Finals. As a result,
the ATP Finals is generally considered to be worth slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments, but more points than the Olympics.Again, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions
and perspectives. Some people may value the Olympics or the ATP Finals more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal preferences, the performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each tournament is
determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:04:49 PMAre you sure about that? Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in best of 5 format and could be
worth significantly less than grand slam tournaments.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:05:05 PMYou are correct that the fact that the Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in the best-of-five format can be a factor that reduces their value compared to the Grand
Slam tournaments. The best-of-five format requires greater physical and mental stamina and endurance, which is why winning a Grand Slam title is considered a significant achievement in tennis.However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by
the format of the matches. Other factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition, and the history and tradition of the tournament can also influence its value. Based on these factors, many people still consider the Olympics and ATP
Finals to be highly prestigious and valuable tournaments. For example, winning a gold medal at the Olympics is a significant achievement in any sport, and the ATP Finals features the top eight players in the world and is considered one of the most
prestigious tournaments in men's tennis.Ultimately, the point values of different tournaments are subjective and can vary based on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points
values of the Olympics and ATP Finals are generally considered to be slightly lower than the Grand Slam tournaments, but still highly valuable and prestigious.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.
html*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:08:28 PMAnd what's the value of ATP masters 1000 tournaments if Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, the other grand slam tournaments being worth 6 PTS, Olympics being 4 and ATP Finals being worth 5 PTS.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:12:30
PMThe ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are also highly prestigious events on the men's tennis calendar. These tournaments are played on hard courts and clay courts, and feature the top players in the world competing against each other in a series of nine
events throughout the year.In terms of point values, the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are generally considered to be worth fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments, but more points than the Olympics and some other tournaments. Based on public
perception and the opinions of many players, the point value of the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments is generally considered to be:3. ATP Masters 1000: 4 or 5 PTS - The point value of the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments can vary depending on individual opinions
and perspectives. Some people may consider them to be worth 4 points, while others may consider them to be worth 5 points. However, they are generally considered to be highly valuable and prestigious tournaments, as they feature the top players in the
world competing against each other in a series of events throughout the year.Overall, the point values of different tournaments are subjective and can vary based on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the
opinions of many players, the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are generally considered to be highly valuable and prestigious events, but worth fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.
amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html




*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:10:19 PM

So based on this, winning 20 ATP 1000 masters titles is more worth than winning 10 grand slam titles? But I think 10 grand slam titles is better result for players legacy.



ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM

You are correct that winning 10 Grand Slam titles is generally considered a more significant achievement in tennis and has a greater impact on a player's legacy than winning 20 ATP Masters 1000 titles.

While the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are highly prestigious and valuable events, they are not considered to be on the same level as the Grand Slam tournaments in terms of historical significance, tradition, and overall importance in the sport of tennis.
Winning a Grand Slam title requires winning seven best-of-five matches against the best players in the world, which is a significant challenge that requires both physical and mental endurance.

Winning multiple Grand Slam titles is a rare and impressive feat that only a few players have accomplished, and it is generally considered the ultimate measure of a player's success and legacy in the sport.

In contrast, winning multiple ATP Masters 1000 titles is certainly a notable achievement, but it is not considered to be on the same level as winning a Grand Slam title. The ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are played over a shorter period of time, and while
they feature many of the top players in the world, they do not have the same level of historical significance and prestige as the Grand Slam tournaments.

In conclusion, while winning 20 ATP Masters 1000 titles is certainly a remarkable achievement, it is generally considered to be less significant than winning 10 Grand Slam titles in terms of a player's legacy and impact on the sport of tennis.



*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:12:01 PM

So if we are interested only in long-term legacy, and if Wimbledon is worth 7 points, what's the valid of Australian Open, French Open, US Open, Olympics, ATP Finals and ATP 1000 masters titles? Only legacy matters


ChatGPT, New Chat

6/18/2023, 10:22:14 PM
What's the best model for betting on tennis
Main Avatar
6/18/2023, 10:22:21 PM
As an AI language model, I cannot provide opinions or personal preferences. However, there are several popular models for betting on tennis, including:

1. Statistical models: These models use historical data and statistics to predict the outcome of a match. Factors such as player rankings, recent form, head-to-head records, and surface preferences are taken into account.

2. Expert opinion models: These models rely on the predictions and insights of tennis experts, such as former players or coaches. They are often used in combination with statistical models.

3. Machine learning models: These models use algorithms and artificial intelligence to analyze large datasets and make predictions. They can be trained on a variety of factors, including player data, match statistics, and betting odds.

Ultimately, the best model for betting on tennis will depend on your personal preferences and betting strategy. It's important to do your research and find a model that aligns with your goals and betting style.
Main Avatar
6/18/2023, 10:23:06 PM
What's the best strategy for tennis betting
Main Avatar
6/18/2023, 10:23:19 PM
As an AI language model, I cannot provide opinions or personal preferences. However, here are some general strategies that may be helpful for tennis betting:

1. Study player form and head-to-head records: Look at how players have performed in recent matches and their records against each other. This can give you insights into which player is likely to win.

2. Consider the surface: Different players perform better on different surfaces, so it's important to take this into account when betting. For example, Rafael Nadal is known for his dominance on clay courts, while Roger Federer has historically performed
better on grass.

3. Look for value in the odds: Don't just bet on the favorite - sometimes there is better value in betting on the underdog. Look for matches where the odds seem too high or too low based on the players' form and head-to-head records.

4. Use a betting bankroll management strategy: This involves setting aside a specific amount of money for betting and only using a small percentage of it for each bet. This can help you avoid losing too much money on a single bet.

5. Consider live betting: Live betting allows you to place bets while a match is in progress. This can be a good way to take advantage of changing odds or momentum shifts in the match.

Remember, there is no single "best" strategy for tennis betting - it's important to do your research and find a strategy that works for you.
Main Avatar
6/18/2023, 10:23:47 PM
Is normal distribution useful for tennis betting
Main Avatar
6/18/2023, 10:23:54 PM
Normal distribution can be useful for tennis betting, as it is a statistical concept that can help you determine the likelihood of certain outcomes. For example, if you are betting on the total number of games in a match, you could use a normal
distribution to estimate the probability of the match having a certain number of games.

However, it's important to keep in mind that tennis matches are not always normally distributed. Factors such as player form, surface, and head-to-head records can all impact the distribution of outcomes. Additionally, normal distribution assumes that
outcomes are independent, which may not always be the case in tennis.

Therefore, while normal distribution can be a useful tool for tennis betting, it should be used in conjunction with other strategies and should not be relied on as the sole method for making betting decisions.
Main Avatar
6/18/2023, 10:24:44 PM
What's better and more useful for tennis betting, normal distribution or t distribution
Main Avatar
6/18/2023, 10:24:51 PM
Both normal distribution and t distribution can be useful for tennis betting, but their usefulness depends on the specific situation and the data being analyzed.

Normal distribution assumes that the data is normally distributed, while t distribution assumes that the data follows a t-distribution. T distribution is used when the sample size is small or the population standard deviation is unknown. In tennis
betting, t distribution may be useful when dealing with smaller sample sizes, such as when analyzing the performance of a player over a few matches.

However, in most cases, normal distribution is more commonly used in tennis betting as it assumes a larger sample size and is more widely applicable. For example, normal distribution can be used to analyze the distribution of outcomes for a player over
an entire season or for a specific tournament.

Ultimately, the choice between normal distribution and t distribution will depend on the specific situation and the data being analyzed. It's important to have a good understanding of both concepts and when to use them to make informed betting decisions.
Main Avatar
6/18/2023, 10:25:56 PM
Who is Djokovic
Main Avatar
6/18/2023, 10:26:05 PM
Novak Djokovic is a professional tennis player from Serbia who is widely considered one of the greatest tennis players of all time. He was born on May 22, 1987, in Belgrade, Yugoslavia (now Serbia).

Djokovic has won 20 Grand Slam singles titles, tying him with Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal for the most in men's tennis history. He has also won numerous other titles and awards throughout his career, including five ATP Finals titles, 36 ATP Tour
Masters 1000 titles, and two Olympic medals (bronze in singles at the 2008 Beijing Olympics and a bronze in doubles at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics).

Djokovic has been ranked world No. 1 by the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) a record total of 338 weeks, including a streak of 122 consecutive weeks from July 2014 to November 2016. He is known for his exceptional athleticism, mental toughness,
and all-around game, and is widely regarded as one of the best returners in tennis history.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PM
If Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM
Based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:

1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.

2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by
players and fans alike.

3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a
difficult environment for players to compete in.

It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 3:56:55 PM
Is perhaps French Open second most valuable due to unique surface?
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM
Yes, the French Open is often considered the second most valuable Grand Slam tournament due to its unique surface. Unlike the other three Grand Slam tournaments, which are played on hard courts or grass courts, the French Open is played on clay courts.
Clay court tennis requires a different set of skills and strategies than other surfaces, such as the ability to slide and move effectively on the surface and the ability to construct points in a way that takes advantage of the slower court speed.

Winning the French Open is considered a significant achievement in tennis, as it requires a player to be able to adapt their game to the unique demands of the surface. Additionally, the French Open is often viewed as a test of a player's mental toughness,
as the long rallies and slower court speed can make it a physically and mentally demanding tournament.

Overall, the combination of the unique surface, the history and tradition of the tournament, and the challenges it presents to players make the French Open a highly valued event in the tennis world.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 3:57:32 PM
So what's the value of French Open if Wimbledon is 7 pts
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM
As mentioned earlier, based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the French Open is generally considered to be worth 6 points in comparison to the Wimbledon title. This is due to the unique challenges and demands of the clay court
surface, as well as the history and tradition of the tournament.

However, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the French Open more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal preferences, the
performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each Grand Slam tournament is determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:01:26 PM
And what's the value of Olympics and ATP Finals if Wimbledon is worth 7 PTS and other grand slam tournaments are worth 6 PTS?
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM
The value of the Olympics and ATP Finals can also be subjective and vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points values of the Olympics and ATP Finals are
generally considered to be:

1. Olympics: 4 PTS - The Olympics is a unique event that takes place every four years and is highly prestigious. However, it is not solely a tennis event, and many top players have skipped the tournament in the past due to scheduling conflicts or other
reasons. As a result, the Olympics is generally seen as being worth slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments.

2. ATP Finals: 5 PTS - The ATP Finals is the season-ending tournament for the top eight players in the world rankings. It is highly prestigious and is viewed as a major title in its own right. However, it is not a Grand Slam tournament, and some players
may prioritize the Grand Slam events over the ATP Finals. As a result, the ATP Finals is generally considered to be worth slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments, but more points than the Olympics.

Again, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the Olympics or the ATP Finals more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal
preferences, the performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each tournament is determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:04:49 PM
Are you sure about that? Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in best of 5 format and could be worth significantly less than grand slam tournaments.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM
You are correct that the fact that the Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in the best-of-five format can be a factor that reduces their value compared to the Grand Slam tournaments. The best-of-five format requires greater physical and mental stamina
and endurance, which is why winning a Grand Slam title is considered a significant achievement in tennis.

However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by the format of the matches. Other factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition, and the history and tradition of the tournament can also influence its value.

Based on these factors, many people still consider the Olympics and ATP Finals to be highly prestigious and valuable tournaments. For example, winning a gold medal at the Olympics is a significant achievement in any sport, and the ATP Finals features the
top eight players in the world and is considered one of the most prestigious tournaments in men's tennis.

Ultimately, the point values of different tournaments are subjective and can vary based on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points values of the Olympics and ATP Finals are
generally considered to be slightly lower than the Grand Slam tournaments, but still highly valuable and prestigious.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:08:28 PM
And what's the value of ATP masters 1000 tournaments if Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, the other grand slam tournaments being worth 6 PTS, Olympics being 4 and ATP Finals being worth 5 PTS.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM
The ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are also highly prestigious events on the men's tennis calendar. These tournaments are played on hard courts and clay courts, and feature the top players in the world competing against each other in a series of nine
events throughout the year.

In terms of point values, the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are generally considered to be worth fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments, but more points than the Olympics and some other tournaments. Based on public perception and the opinions of
many players, the point value of the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments is generally considered to be:

3. ATP Masters 1000: 4 or 5 PTS - The point value of the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may consider them to be worth 4 points, while others may consider them to be worth 5 points.
However, they are generally considered to be highly valuable and prestigious tournaments, as they feature the top players in the world competing against each other in a series of events throughout the year.

Overall, the point values of different tournaments are subjective and can vary based on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are generally considered
to be highly valuable and prestigious events, but worth fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:10:19 PM
So based on this, winning 20 ATP 1000 masters titles is more worth than winning 10 grand slam titles? But I think 10 grand slam titles is better result for players legacy.
Main Avatar
6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM
You are correct that winning 10 Grand Slam titles is generally considered a more significant achievement in tennis and has a greater impact on a player's legacy than winning 20 ATP Masters 1000 titles.

While the ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are highly prestigious and valuable events, they are not considered to be on the same level as the Grand Slam tournaments in terms of historical significance, tradition, and overall importance in the sport of tennis.
Winning a Grand Slam title requires winning seven best-of-five matches against the best players in the world, which is a significant challenge that requires both physical and mental endurance.

Winning multiple Grand Slam titles is a rare and impressive feat that only a few players have accomplished, and it is generally considered the ultimate measure of a player's success and legacy in the sport.

In contrast, winning multiple ATP Masters 1000 titles is certainly a notable achievement, but it is not considered to be on the same level as winning a Grand Slam title. The ATP Masters 1000 tournaments are played over a shorter period of time, and while
they feature many of the top players in the world, they do not have the same level of historical significance and prestige as the Grand Slam tournaments.

In conclusion, while winning 20 ATP Masters 1000 titles is certainly a remarkable achievement, it is generally considered to be less significant than winning 10 Grand Slam titles in terms of a player's legacy and impact on the sport of tennis.



*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:12:01 PM

So if we are interested only in long-term legacy, and if Wimbledon is worth 7 points, what's the valid of Australian Open, French Open, US Open, Olympics, ATP Finals and ATP 1000 masters titles? Only legacy matters



ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:12:30 PM

If we are interested only in long-term legacy and considering that Wimbledon is worth 7 points, the value of other titles can be perceived as follows:

1. Australian Open: 6 points - Winning the Australian Open is a significant achievement and is considered one of the four Grand Slam tournaments. It is played on hard courts and is the first Grand Slam event of the year, which makes it an important
tournament for players to start the season well. Winning the Australian Open can also give players momentum for the rest of the year and can help establish their legacy in the sport.

2. French Open: 6 points - Winning the French Open is also a significant achievement and is one of the four Grand Slam tournaments. It is played on clay courts and requires a different set of skills compared to the other Grand Slam tournaments. Winning
the French Open is a notable achievement and can help establish a player's legacy as a versatile and well-rounded tennis player.

3. US Open: 6 points - Winning the US Open is another significant achievement and is one of the four Grand Slam tournaments. It is played on hard courts and is the last Grand Slam event of the year, which makes it an important tournament for players to
finish the year strong. Winning the US Open can also help establish a player's legacy as a consistent performer throughout the year.

4. Olympics: 4 points - Winning a gold medal at the Olympics is a significant achievement in any sport, and in tennis, it is a prestigious event that takes place every four years. Although it is not solely a tennis event, winning a gold medal at the
Olympics can help establish a player's legacy as an all-around athlete and can be a highlight of their career.

5. ATP Finals: 5 points - Winning the ATP Finals is a significant achievement and is considered one of the most prestigious tournaments in men's tennis. It features the top eight players in the world competing against each other and is played at the end
of the season, which makes it an important tournament for players to finish the year strong. Winning the ATP Finals can also help establish a player's legacy as a consistent performer throughout the year.

6. ATP Masters 1000: 4 or 5 points - Winning multiple ATP Masters 1000 titles is a notable achievement and can help establish a player's legacy as a consistent performer throughout the year. However, it is generally considered to be less significant than
winning a Grand Slam title or the ATP Finals in terms of a player's overall legacy.

Overall, winning multiple Grand Slam titles is generally considered the ultimate measure of a player's success and legacy in the sport of tennis. However, winning other prestigious events such as the Olympics, ATP Finals, and ATP Masters 1000 titles can
also help establish a player's legacy and contribute to their overall success in the sport.

--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 4:06:24 PM UTC+2, *skriptis wrote:

*skriptis <skri...@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r

*skriptis <skri...@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PMIf Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.ChatGPT, 6/20/

2023, 3:51:41 PMBased on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This
tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be
challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by players and fans alike.3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically
demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a difficult environment for players to compete in.It's important to note that these
point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html*skriptis: 6/20/2023, 3:56:55 PMIs perhaps French Open second most valuable due to unique surface?ChatGPT: 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PMYes, the French Open is often considered the second most valuable
Grand Slam tournament due to its unique surface. Unlike the other three Grand Slam tournaments, which are played on hard courts or grass courts, the French Open is played on clay courts. Clay court tennis requires a different set of skills and strategies
than other surfaces, such as the ability to slide and move effectively on the surface and the ability to construct points in a way that takes advantage of the slower court speed.Winning the French Open is considered a significant achievement in tennis,
as it requires a player to be able to adapt their game to the unique demands of the surface. Additionally, the French Open is often viewed as a test of a player's mental toughness, as the long rallies and slower court speed can make it a physically and
mentally demanding tournament.Overall, the combination of the unique surface, the history and tradition of the tournament, and the challenges it presents to players make the French Open a highly valued event in the tennis world.*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:57:
32 PMSo what's the value of French Open if Wimbledon is 7 ptsChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:57:39 PMAs mentioned earlier, based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the French Open is generally considered to be worth 6 points in comparison
to the Wimbledon title. This is due to the unique challenges and demands of the clay court surface, as well as the history and tradition of the tournament. However, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on
individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the French Open more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal preferences, the performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each Grand
Slam tournament is determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:01:26 PM

And what's the value of Olympics and ATP Finals if Wimbledon is worth 7 PTS and other grand slam tournaments are worth 6 PTS?

ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:01:39 PM

The value of the Olympics and ATP Finals can also be subjective and vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points values of the Olympics and ATP Finals are

generally considered to be:

1. Olympics: 4 PTS - The Olympics is a unique event that takes place every four years and is highly prestigious. However, it is not solely a tennis event, and many top players have skipped the tournament in the past due to scheduling conflicts or other

reasons. As a result, the Olympics is generally seen as being worth slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments.

2. ATP Finals: 5 PTS - The ATP Finals is the season-ending tournament for the top eight players in the world rankings. It is highly prestigious and is viewed as a major title in its own right. However, it is not a Grand Slam tournament, and some

players may prioritize the Grand Slam events over the ATP Finals. As a result, the ATP Finals is generally considered to be worth slightly fewer points than the Grand Slam tournaments, but more points than the Olympics.

Again, it's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. Some people may value the Olympics or the ATP Finals more highly than others, based on factors such as their personal

preferences, the performance of their favorite players, or other factors. Ultimately, the value of each tournament is determined by a complex set of factors, including its history, tradition, prestige, and the challenges it presents to players.

*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 4:04:49 PM

Are you sure about that? Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in best of 5 format and could be worth significantly less than grand slam tournaments.

ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 4:05:05 PM

You are correct that the fact that the Olympics and ATP Finals are not played in the best-of-five format can be a factor that reduces their value compared to the Grand Slam tournaments. The best-of-five format requires greater physical and mental

stamina and endurance, which is why winning a Grand Slam title is considered a significant achievement in tennis.

However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by the format of the matches. Other factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition,

hahahaha

and the history and tradition of the tournament can also influence its value.

Based on these factors, many people still consider the Olympics and ATP Finals to be highly prestigious and valuable tournaments. For example, winning a gold medal at the Olympics is a significant achievement in any sport, and the ATP Finals features

the top eight players in the world and is considered one of the most prestigious tournaments in men's tennis.

Ultimately, the point values of different tournaments are subjective and can vary based on individual opinions and perspectives. However, based on public perception and the opinions of many players, the points values of the Olympics and ATP Finals are

generally considered to be slightly lower than the Grand Slam tournaments, but still highly valuable and prestigious.

--

----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

joh <joshorst@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 4:06:24 PM UTC+2, *skriptis wrote:

However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by the format of the matches. Other factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition...

hahahaha

The level of competition matters somewhat as we've said and everyone recognizes it, but joh you're barking at the wrong tree.

Regarding competition, what matters most is where are the best players, and in the 60s, Australian championships had the best players, best players were Australians and they played there at home.

Who is more important for the prestige of the tournament and the level of competition, Laver, Rosewall, Emerson, Newcombe... or some American journeymen who couldn't win US or any other title in that period?

They skipped Australia and therefore the tournament was not as prestigious, despite all the Aussie greats being there, greats who won 30 out of 40 slams in that decade?

I think you're conflating 60s and the 70s when AO clearly lost prestige. No?


But even then, when there's a clear case of lost prestige, as Whisper says, it's kinda unfair to those who don't win it or skip it. History won't care.

Slams have enough weight and legacy and they can endure brown patches and lesser winners. In the end, slams never lose, it's like a house in gambling.

Only those who don't win lose.

--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 1:04:10 PM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:

joh <josh...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 4:06:24 PM UTC+2, *skriptis wrote:

However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by the format of the matches. Other factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition...

hahahaha

The level of competition matters somewhat as we've said and everyone recognizes it, but joh you're barking at the wrong tree.

Regarding competition, what matters most is where are the best players, and in the 60s, Australian championships had the best players, best players were Australians and they played there at home.

Who is more important for the prestige of the tournament and the level of competition, Laver, Rosewall, Emerson, Newcombe... or some American journeymen who couldn't win US or any other title in that period?

They skipped Australia and therefore the tournament was not as prestigious, despite all the Aussie greats being there, greats who won 30 out of 40 slams in that decade?

I think you're conflating 60s and the 70s when AO clearly lost prestige. No?

But even then, when there's a clear case of lost prestige, as Whisper says, it's kinda unfair to those who don't win it or skip it. History won't care.

Slams have enough weight and legacy and they can endure brown patches and lesser winners. In the end, slams never lose, it's like a house in gambling.

Only those who don't win lose.
--

----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

Yes, Emmo, 5times and Bowery!!!!! 63-68 lololololololol

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"gap...@gmail.com" <gapp111@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 1:04:10 PM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:> joh <josh...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:> >> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 4:06:24 PM UTC+2, *skriptis wrote:> However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by the

format of the matches. Other factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition... > > > hahahaha > > > The level of competition matters somewhat as we've said and everyone recognizes it, but joh you're barking at the wrong tree. > >
Regarding competition, what matters most is where are the best players, and in the 60s, Australian championships had the best players, best players were Australians and they played there at home. > > Who is more important for the prestige of the
tournament and the level of competition, Laver, Rosewall, Emerson, Newcombe... or some American journeymen who couldn't win US or any other title in that period? > > They skipped Australia and therefore the tournament was not as prestigious, despite all
the Aussie greats being there, greats who won 30 out of 40 slams in that decade? > > I think you're conflating 60s and the 70s when AO clearly lost prestige. No? > > > But even then, when there's a clear case of lost prestige, as Whisper says, it's kinda
unfair to those who don't win it or skip it. History won't care. > > Slams have enough weight and legacy and they can endure brown patches and lesser winners. In the end, slams never lose, it's like a house in gambling. > > Only those who don't win lose.>
-- > > > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYes, Emmo, 5times and Bowery!!!!! 63-68 lololololololol



Emmo won double CGS.

He won 6 in Australia and 2 each elsewhere.

Why couldn't some American or French stop him if he sucked that much?



--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 1:48:16 PM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:

"gap...@gmail.com" <gap...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 1:04:10 PM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:> joh <josh...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:> >> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 4:06:24 PM UTC+2, *skriptis wrote:> However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by the

format of the matches. Other factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition... > > > hahahaha > > > The level of competition matters somewhat as we've said and everyone recognizes it, but joh you're barking at the wrong tree. > >
Regarding competition, what matters most is where are the best players, and in the 60s, Australian championships had the best players, best players were Australians and they played there at home. > > Who is more important for the prestige of the
tournament and the level of competition, Laver, Rosewall, Emerson, Newcombe... or some American journeymen who couldn't win US or any other title in that period? > > They skipped Australia and therefore the tournament was not as prestigious, despite all
the Aussie greats being there, greats who won 30 out of 40 slams in that decade? > > I think you're conflating 60s and the 70s when AO clearly lost prestige. No? > > > But even then, when there's a clear case of lost prestige, as Whisper says, it's kinda
unfair to those who don't win it or skip it. History won't care. > > Slams have enough weight and legacy and they can endure brown patches and lesser winners. In the end, slams never lose, it's like a house in gambling. > > Only those who don't win lose.>
-- > > > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYes, Emmo, 5times and Bowery!!!!! 63-68 lololololololol

Emmo won double CGS.

He won 6 in Australia and 2 each elsewhere.

Why couldn't some American or French stop him if he sucked that much?
--

----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

No one went to Oz, not even the Irish crims!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 20/06/2023 11:56 pm, *skriptis wrote:

*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PM

If Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.

ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:51:41 PM

Based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:

1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.

2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by

players and fans alike.

3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a

difficult environment for players to compete in.

It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.

Very interesting. My 1st criteria when devising 7543 was;

1) Wimbledon plus any other slam can't be beaten in that year. 7666
works there.

My 2nd criteria was a question; 'is 1 Wimbledon title more prestigious
than 2 AO titles?'. My thinking was always 'yes, but 3 AO titles is
better than 1 Wimbledon'.

7543 fits, but not 7666. So the question is was I wrong in thinking 1 Wimbledon beats 2 AOs?

I'll post a list comparing 7543 to 7666 and see if it feels right : )

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

T24gMjEvMDYvMjAyMyAzOjQ4IGFtLCAqc2tyaXB0aXMgd3JvdGU6DQo+ICJnYXAuLi5AZ21h aWwuY29tIiA8Z2FwcDExMUBnbWFpbC5jb20+IFdyb3RlIGluIG1lc3NhZ2U6cg0KPj4gT24g VHVlc2RheSwgSnVuZSAyMCwgMjAyMyBhdCAxOjA0OjEw4oCvUE0gVVRDLTQsICpza3JpcHRp cyB3cm90ZTo+IGpvaCA8am9zaC4uLkBnbWFpbC5jb20+IFdyb3RlIGluIG1lc3NhZ2U6PiA+ PiBPbiBUdWVzZGF5LCBKdW5lIDIwLCAyMDIzIGF0IDQ6MDY6MjTigK9QTSBVVEMrMiwgKnNr cmlwdGlzIHdyb3RlOj4gSG93ZXZlciwgdGhlIHZhbHVlIG9mIGEgdG91cm5hbWVudCBpcyBu b3Qgc29sZWx5IGRldGVybWluZWQgYnkgdGhlIGZvcm1hdCBvZiB0aGUgbWF0Y2hlcy4gT3Ro ZXIgZmFjdG9ycyBzdWNoIGFzIHRoZSBwcmVzdGlnZSBvZiB0aGUgZXZlbnQsIHRoZSBsZXZl bCBvZiBjb21wZXRpdGlvbi4uLiA+ID4gPiBoYWhhaGFoYSA+ID4gPiBUaGUgbGV2ZWwgb2Yg Y29tcGV0aXRpb24gbWF0dGVycyBzb21ld2hhdCBhcyB3ZSd2ZSBzYWlkIGFuZCBldmVyeW9u ZSByZWNvZ25pemVzIGl0LCBidXQgam9oIHlvdSdyZSBiYXJraW5nIGF0IHRoZSB3cm9uZyB0 cmVlLiA+ID4gUmVnYXJkaW5nIGNvbXBldGl0aW9uLCB3aGF0IG1hdHRlcnMgbW9zdCBpcyB3 aGVyZSBhcmUgdGhlIGJlc3QgcGxheWVycywgYW5kIGluIHRoZSA2MHMsIEF1c3RyYWxpYW4g Y2hhbXBpb25zaGlwcyBoYWQgdGhlIGJlc3QgcGxheWVycywgYmVzdCBwbGF5ZXJzIHdlcmUg QXVzdHJhbGlhbnMgYW5kIHRoZXkgcGxheWVkIHRoZXJlIGF0IGhvbWUuID4gPiBXaG8gaXMg bW9yZSBpbXBvcnRhbnQgZm9yIHRoZSBwcmVzdGlnZSBvZiB0aGUgdG91cm5hbWVudCBhbmQg dGhlIGxldmVsIG9mIGNvbXBldGl0aW9uLCBMYXZlciwgUm9zZXdhbGwsIEVtZXJzb24sIE5l d2NvbWJlLi4uIG9yIHNvbWUgQW1lcmljYW4gam91cm5leW1lbiB3aG8gY291bGRuJ3Qgd2lu IFVTIG9yIGFueSBvdGhlciB0aXRsZSBpbiB0aGF0IHBlcmlvZD8gPiA+IFRoZXkgc2tpcHBl ZCBBdXN0cmFsaWEgYW5kIHRoZXJlZm9yZSB0aGUgdG91cm5hbWVudCB3YXMgbm90IGFzIHBy ZXN0aWdpb3VzLCBkZXNwaXRlIGFsbCB0aGUgQXVzc2llIGdyZWF0cyBiZWluZyB0aGVyZSwg Z3JlYXRzIHdobyB3b24gMzAgb3V0IG9mIDQwIHNsYW1zIGluIHRoYXQgZGVjYWRlPyA+ID4g SSB0aGluayB5b3UncmUgY29uZmxhdGluZyA2MHMgYW5kIHRoZSA3MHMgd2hlbiBBTyBjbGVh cmx5IGxvc3QgcHJlc3RpZ2UuIE5vPyA+ID4gPiBCdXQgZXZlbiB0aGVuLCB3aGVuIHRoZXJl J3MgYSBjbGVhciBjYXNlIG9mIGxvc3QgcHJlc3RpZ2UsIGFzIFdoaXNwZXIgc2F5cywgaXQn cyBraW5kYSB1bmZhaXIgdG8gdGhvc2Ugd2hvIGRvbid0IHdpbiBpdCBvciBza2lwIGl0LiBI aXN0b3J5IHdvbid0IGNhcmUuID4gPiBTbGFtcyBoYXZlIGVub3VnaCB3ZWlnaHQgYW5kIGxl Z2FjeSBhbmQgdGhleSBjYW4gZW5kdXJlIGJyb3duIHBhdGNoZXMgYW5kIGxlc3NlciB3aW5u ZXJzLiBJbiB0aGUgZW5kLCBzbGFtcyBuZXZlciBsb3NlLCBpdCdzIGxpa2UgYSBob3VzZSBp biBnYW1ibGluZy4gPiA+IE9ubHkgdGhvc2Ugd2hvIGRvbid0IHdpbiBsb3NlLj4gLS0gPiA+ ID4gPiA+IC0tLS1BbmRyb2lkIE5ld3NHcm91cCBSZWFkZXItLS0tID4gaHR0cHM6Ly9waWFv aG9uZy5zMy11cy13ZXN0LTIuYW1hem9uYXdzLmNvbS91c2VuZXQvaW5kZXguaHRtbFllcywg RW1tbywgNXRpbWVzIGFuZCBCb3dlcnkhISEhISA2My02OCBsb2xvbG9sb2xvbG9sb2wNCj4g DQo+IA0KPiANCj4gRW1tbyB3b24gZG91YmxlIENHUy4NCj4gDQo+IEhlIHdvbiA2IGluIEF1 c3RyYWxpYSBhbmQgMiBlYWNoIGVsc2V3aGVyZS4NCj4gDQo+IFdoeSBjb3VsZG4ndCBzb21l IEFtZXJpY2FuIG9yIEZyZW5jaCBzdG9wIGhpbSBpZiBoZSBzdWNrZWQgdGhhdCBtdWNoPw0K PiANCj4gDQo+IA0KDQoNCkVtbW8gd2FzIGhvdCBmYXZlIHRvIHdpbiAzIFdpbWJsZWRvbnMg aW4gYSByb3cgYnV0IHJhbiBpbnRvIHRoZSBuZXQgDQpydW5uaW5nIGluIGZvciBhIGRyb3Ag c2hvdCBhbmQgaGFkIHRvIHdpdGhkcmF3IGR1ZSB0byBpbmp1cnkuDQo=

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

For YEC, OG and Master Series tournament chatpot is just using ATP points scheme.

YEC max 1500p vs 2000p
Master serie 1000p vs 2000p
OG (once it gave ranking points and it was 750p)

It correctly puts Wimb ahead of others.

Sidenote: I btw use 6554 and 2 for YEC/OG and 1 for MS ... and 4 for Year-end #1. (I have a little excel-based toying tool for speculations and "woulda-coulda-shoulda" scenarios)

.mikko

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 21/06/2023 8:22 pm, MBDunc wrote:

For YEC, OG and Master Series tournament chatpot is just using ATP points scheme.

YEC max 1500p vs 2000p
Master serie 1000p vs 2000p
OG (once it gave ranking points and it was 750p)

It correctly puts Wimb ahead of others.

Sidenote: I btw use 6554 and 2 for YEC/OG and 1 for MS ... and 4 for Year-end #1. (I have a little excel-based toying tool for speculations and "woulda-coulda-shoulda" scenarios)

.mikko

chatgpt correctly concludes slams are 'on another level' so silly to
give MS 4 pts. As Lendl said 40 yrs ago 'nobody cares if you win 80 tournaments and another guy wins 50, but everyone cares about 8 slams v
6'. Simple but true.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 21/06/2023 7:36 pm, Whisper wrote:

On 20/06/2023 11:56 pm, *skriptis wrote:

Very interesting.  My 1st criteria when devising 7543 was;

1) Wimbledon plus any other slam can't be beaten in that year.  7666
works there.

My 2nd criteria was a question; 'is 1 Wimbledon title more prestigious
than 2 AO titles?'.  My thinking was always 'yes, but 3 AO titles is
better than 1 Wimbledon'.

7543 fits, but not 7666.  So the question is was I wrong in thinking 1 Wimbledon beats 2 AOs?

I'll post a list comparing 7543 to 7666 and see if it feels right : )

Ok here is the comparison;

7543

1 Djokovic 106
2 Federer 103
3 Nadal 96
4 Sampras 80
5 Borg 59
6 Tilden 56
7 Laver 55
8 Emerson 50


7666

1 Djokovic 145
2 Nadal 134
3 Federer 128
4 Sampras 91
5 Emerson 74
6 Borg 71
7 Laver 70
8 Tilden 63


Interesting change, Nadal moves to no.2 and Federer drops to 3 - which
is how most people see it anyway. Also Emerson gets promoted from 8 to
5 as his 6 AOs get more weight.



For the women;

7543


serena 112
graf 110
moody 107
nav 100
court 99
evert 85
King 69
Connolly 47


7666

court 147
serena 145
graf 139
moody 122
nav 117
evert 111
King 78
Connolly 57


Biggest beneficiary is Margaret Court who moves to no.1 from no.5.
Pretty easy to argue Court is goat anyway with most slams (singles and doubles), calendar slam, 192 titles overall in singles etc.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 19:52:23 UTC+1, gap...@gmail.com wrote:

On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 1:48:16 PM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:

"gap...@gmail.com" <gap...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 1:04:10 PM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:> joh <josh...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:> >> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 4:06:24 PM UTC+2, *skriptis wrote:> However, the value of a tournament is not solely determined by the

format of the matches. Other factors such as the prestige of the event, the level of competition... > > > hahahaha > > > The level of competition matters somewhat as we've said and everyone recognizes it, but joh you're barking at the wrong tree. > >
Regarding competition, what matters most is where are the best players, and in the 60s, Australian championships had the best players, best players were Australians and they played there at home. > > Who is more important for the prestige of the
tournament and the level of competition, Laver, Rosewall, Emerson, Newcombe... or some American journeymen who couldn't win US or any other title in that period? > > They skipped Australia and therefore the tournament was not as prestigious, despite all
the Aussie greats being there, greats who won 30 out of 40 slams in that decade? > > I think you're conflating 60s and the 70s when AO clearly lost prestige. No? > > > But even then, when there's a clear case of lost prestige, as Whisper says, it's kinda
unfair to those who don't win it or skip it. History won't care. > > Slams have enough weight and legacy and they can endure brown patches and lesser winners. In the end, slams never lose, it's like a house in gambling. > > Only those who don't win lose.>
-- > > > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlYes, Emmo, 5times and Bowery!!!!! 63-68 lololololololol

Emmo won double CGS.

He won 6 in Australia and 2 each elsewhere.

Why couldn't some American or French stop him if he sucked that much?
--

----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

No one went to Oz, not even the Irish crims!!

gappy and joh prob wants us to de-value Wimbledon in the 90's cos some unknown Spanish players didn't play there.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Whisper <whisper@ozemail.com.au> Wrote in message:r

On 21/06/2023 7:36 pm, Whisper wrote:> On 20/06/2023 11:56 pm, *skriptis wrote:>>> > > Very interesting. My 1st criteria when devising 7543 was;> > 1) Wimbledon plus any other slam can't be beaten in that year. 7666 > works there.> > My 2nd criteria

was a question; 'is 1 Wimbledon title more prestigious > than 2 AO titles?'. My thinking was always 'yes, but 3 AO titles is > better than 1 Wimbledon'.> > 7543 fits, but not 7666. So the question is was I wrong in thinking 1 > Wimbledon beats 2 AOs?> >
I'll post a list comparing 7543 to 7666 and see if it feels right : )> > > Ok here is the comparison;75431 Djokovic 1062 Federer 1033 Nadal 964 Sampras 805 Borg 596 Tilden 567 Laver 558 Emerson 5076661 Djokovic 1452 Nadal 1343 Federer 1284 Sampras 915
Emerson 746 Borg 717 Laver 708 Tilden 63Interesting change, Nadal moves to no.2 and Federer drops to 3 - which is how most people see it anyway. Also Emerson gets promoted from 8 to 5 as his 6 AOs get more weight.For the women;7543serena 112graf
110moody 107nav 100court 99evert 85King 69Connolly 477666court 147serena 145graf 139moody 122nav 117evert 111King 78Connolly 57Biggest beneficiary is Margaret Court who moves to no.1 from no.5. Pretty easy to argue Court is goat anyway with most slams (
singles and doubles), calendar slam, 192 titles overall in singles etc.



Yes very interesting. As Mikko said ChatGPT is obviously influenced (led) by this logic.

All slams are equal, but Wimbledon is a little bit ahead.

I assume if I had picked 20 pts for Wimbledon instead of 7, ChatGPT would have given 19 pts to other slams.

It just puts Wimbledon ahead but wants to keep 1111 too.

In its mind, Wimbledon titles should not be used to overcome slam gap, but out of two slam tallies, the one with more Wimbledon titles is prestigious.


That makes sense I guess. It's actually good answer since the current era is defined by slam counting.



Likewise, I accept Olympics at 4, YEC at 5 is a bit surprising, but ATP 1000 masters series at 4-5 is stupid imo and unclear where does it come from?

I don't know where it got that.

Yes, Mikko is right that ChatGPT followed ATP rankings scheme, but the scheme is correct for Olympics - YEC - ATP 1000.

However it didn't follow ATP rankings entirely.

If slams are 6-7, how could it award 4-5 to ATP 1000?

If it truly followed ATP rankings, ATP 1000s should be cca 3 or 3,5.



I am not sure what is this all about.


It seems ChatGPT is a big fan of ATP 1000s?


--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

T24gMjEuNi4yMDIzIDEzLjM1LCBUaGUgSWNlYmVyZyB3cm90ZToNCj4gT24gVHVlc2RheSwg MjAgSnVuZSAyMDIzIGF0IDE5OjUyOjIzIFVUQysxLCBnYXAuLi5AZ21haWwuY29tIHdyb3Rl Og0KPj4gT24gVHVlc2RheSwgSnVuZSAyMCwgMjAyMyBhdCAxOjQ4OjE24oCvUE0gVVRDLTQs ICpza3JpcHRpcyB3cm90ZToNCj4+PiAiZ2FwLi4uQGdtYWlsLmNvbSIgPGdhcC4uLkBnbWFp bC5jb20+IFdyb3RlIGluIG1lc3NhZ2U6cg0KPj4+PiBPbiBUdWVzZGF5LCBKdW5lIDIwLCAy MDIzIGF0IDE6MDQ6MTDigK9QTSBVVEMtNCwgKnNrcmlwdGlzIHdyb3RlOj4gam9oIDxqb3No Li4uQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4gV3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZTo+ID4+IE9uIFR1ZXNkYXksIEp1bmUg MjAsIDIwMjMgYXQgNDowNjoyNOKAr1BNIFVUQysyLCAqc2tyaXB0aXMgd3JvdGU6PiBIb3dl dmVyLCB0aGUgdmFsdWUgb2YgYSB0b3VybmFtZW50IGlzIG5vdCBzb2xlbHkgZGV0ZXJtaW5l ZCBieSB0aGUgZm9ybWF0IG9mIHRoZSBtYXRjaGVzLiBPdGhlciBmYWN0b3JzIHN1Y2ggYXMg dGhlIHByZXN0aWdlIG9mIHRoZSBldmVudCwgdGhlIGxldmVsIG9mIGNvbXBldGl0aW9uLi4u ID4gPiA+IGhhaGFoYWhhID4gPiA+IFRoZSBsZXZlbCBvZiBjb21wZXRpdGlvbiBtYXR0ZXJz IHNvbWV3aGF0IGFzIHdlJ3ZlIHNhaWQgYW5kIGV2ZXJ5b25lIHJlY29nbml6ZXMgaXQsIGJ1 dCBqb2ggeW91J3JlIGJhcmtpbmcgYXQgdGhlIHdyb25nIHRyZWUuID4gPiBSZWdhcmRpbmcg Y29tcGV0aXRpb24sIHdoYXQgbWF0dGVycyBtb3N0IGlzIHdoZXJlIGFyZSB0aGUgYmVzdCBw bGF5ZXJzLCBhbmQgaW4gdGhlIDYwcywgQXVzdHJhbGlhbiBjaGFtcGlvbnNoaXBzIGhhZCB0 aGUgYmVzdCBwbGF5ZXJzLCBiZXN0IHBsYXllcnMgd2VyZSBBdXN0cmFsaWFucyBhbmQgdGhl eSBwbGF5ZWQgdGhlcmUgYXQgaG9tZS4gPiA+IFdobyBpcyBtb3JlIGltcG9ydGFudCBmb3Ig dGhlIHByZXN0aWdlIG9mIHRoZSB0b3VybmFtZW50IGFuZCB0aGUgbGV2ZWwgb2YgY29tcGV0 aXRpb24sIExhdmVyLCBSb3Nld2FsbCwgRW1lcnNvbiwgTmV3Y29tYmUuLi4gb3Igc29tZSBB bWVyaWNhbiBqb3VybmV5bWVuIHdobyBjb3VsZG4ndCB3aW4gVVMgb3IgYW55IG90aGVyIHRp dGxlIGluIHRoYXQgcGVyaW9kPyA+ID4gVGhleSBza2lwcGVkIEF1c3RyYWxpYSBhbmQgdGhl cmVmb3JlIHRoZSB0b3VybmFtZW50IHdhcyBub3QgYXMgcHJlc3RpZ2lvdXMsIGRlc3BpdGUg YWxsIHRoZSBBdXNzaWUgZ3JlYXRzIGJlaW5nIHRoZXJlLCBncmVhdHMgd2hvIHdvbiAzMCBv dXQgb2YgNDAgc2xhbXMgaW4gdGhhdCBkZWNhZGU/ID4gPiBJIHRoaW5rIHlvdSdyZSBjb25m bGF0aW5nIDYwcyBhbmQgdGhlIDcwcyB3aGVuIEFPIGNsZWFybHkgbG9zdCBwcmVzdGlnZS4g Tm8/ID4gPiA+IEJ1dCBldmVuIHRoZW4sIHdoZW4gdGhlcmUncyBhIGNsZWFyIGNhc2Ugb2Yg bG9zdCBwcmVzdGlnZSwgYXMgV2hpc3BlciBzYXlzLCBpdCdzIGtpbmRhIHVuZmFpciB0byB0 aG9zZSB3aG8gZG9uJ3Qgd2luIGl0IG9yIHNraXAgaXQuIEhpc3Rvcnkgd29uJ3QgY2FyZS4g PiA+IFNsYW1zIGhhdmUgZW5vdWdoIHdlaWdodCBhbmQgbGVnYWN5IGFuZCB0aGV5IGNhbiBl bmR1cmUgYnJvd24gcGF0Y2hlcyBhbmQgbGVzc2VyIHdpbm5lcnMuIEluIHRoZSBlbmQsIHNs YW1zIG5ldmVyIGxvc2UsIGl0J3MgbGlrZSBhIGhvdXNlIGluIGdhbWJsaW5nLiA+ID4gT25s eSB0aG9zZSB3aG8gZG9uJ3Qgd2luIGxvc2UuPiAtLSA+ID4gPiA+ID4gLS0tLUFuZHJvaWQg TmV3c0dyb3VwIFJlYWRlci0tLS0gPiBodHRwczovL3BpYW9ob25nLnMzLXVzLXdlc3QtMi5h bWF6b25hd3MuY29tL3VzZW5ldC9pbmRleC5odG1sWWVzLCBFbW1vLCA1dGltZXMgYW5kIEJv d2VyeSEhISEhIDYzLTY4IGxvbG9sb2xvbG9sb2xvbA0KPj4+DQo+Pj4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+IEVt bW8gd29uIGRvdWJsZSBDR1MuDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBIZSB3b24gNiBpbiBBdXN0cmFsaWEgYW5k IDIgZWFjaCBlbHNld2hlcmUuDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBXaHkgY291bGRuJ3Qgc29tZSBBbWVyaWNh biBvciBGcmVuY2ggc3RvcCBoaW0gaWYgaGUgc3Vja2VkIHRoYXQgbXVjaD8NCj4+PiAtLSAN Cj4+Pg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+IC0tLS1BbmRyb2lkIE5ld3NHcm91cCBSZWFkZXIt LS0tDQo+Pj4gaHR0cHM6Ly9waWFvaG9uZy5zMy11cy13ZXN0LTIuYW1hem9uYXdzLmNvbS91 c2VuZXQvaW5kZXguaHRtbA0KPj4gTm8gb25lIHdlbnQgdG8gT3osIG5vdCBldmVuIHRoZSBJ cmlzaCBjcmltcyEhDQo+IA0KPiBnYXBweSBhbmQgam9oIHByb2Igd2FudHMgdXMgdG8gZGUt dmFsdWUgV2ltYmxlZG9uIGluIHRoZSA5MCdzIGNvcyBzb21lIHVua25vd24gU3BhbmlzaCBw bGF5ZXJzIGRpZG4ndCBwbGF5IHRoZXJlLg0KDQpZb3UgZ2V0IG9uZSBwcmVzdGlnZSBwb2lu dCBkZWR1Y3RlZCBldmVyeSB0aW1lIHlvdSB0aW5rZXIgd2l0aCBzdXJmYWNlcy4gDQo2NTc2 Lg0KDQotLSANCiJBbmQgb2ZmIHRoZXkgd2VudCwgZnJvbSBoZXJlIHRvIHRoZXJlLA0KVGhl IGJlYXIsIHRoZSBiZWFyLCBhbmQgdGhlIG1haWRlbiBmYWlyIg0KLS0gVHJhZGl0aW9uYWwN
Cg0K

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

T24gMjEvMDYvMjAyMyAxMDo1OCBwbSwgKnNrcmlwdGlzIHdyb3RlOg0KPiBXaGlzcGVyIDx3 aGlzcGVyQG96ZW1haWwuY29tLmF1PiBXcm90ZSBpbiBtZXNzYWdlOnINCj4+IE9uIDIxLzA2 LzIwMjMgNzozNiBwbSwgV2hpc3BlciB3cm90ZTo+IE9uIDIwLzA2LzIwMjMgMTE6NTYgcG0s ICpza3JpcHRpcyB3cm90ZTo+Pj4gPiA+IFZlcnkgaW50ZXJlc3RpbmcuICBNeSAxc3QgY3Jp dGVyaWEgd2hlbiBkZXZpc2luZyA3NTQzIHdhczs+ID4gMSkgV2ltYmxlZG9uIHBsdXMgYW55 IG90aGVyIHNsYW0gY2FuJ3QgYmUgYmVhdGVuIGluIHRoYXQgeWVhci4gIDc2NjYgPiB3b3Jr cyB0aGVyZS4+ID4gTXkgMm5kIGNyaXRlcmlhIHdhcyBhIHF1ZXN0aW9uOyAnaXMgMSBXaW1i bGVkb24gdGl0bGUgbW9yZSBwcmVzdGlnaW91cyA+IHRoYW4gMiBBTyB0aXRsZXM/Jy4gIE15 IHRoaW5raW5nIHdhcyBhbHdheXMgJ3llcywgYnV0IDMgQU8gdGl0bGVzIGlzID4gYmV0dGVy IHRoYW4gMSBXaW1ibGVkb24nLj4gPiA3NTQzIGZpdHMsIGJ1dCBub3QgNzY2Ni4gIFNvIHRo ZSBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyB3YXMgSSB3cm9uZyBpbiB0aGlua2luZyAxID4gV2ltYmxlZG9uIGJl YXRzIDIgQU9zPz4gPiBJJ2xsIHBvc3QgYSBsaXN0IGNvbXBhcmluZyA3NTQzIHRvIDc2NjYg YW5kIHNlZSBpZiBpdCBmZWVscyByaWdodCA6ICk+ID4gPiBPayBoZXJlIGlzIHRoZSBjb21w YXJpc29uOzc1NDMxIERqb2tvdmljIDEwNjIgRmVkZXJlciAxMDMzIE5hZGFsIDk2NCBTYW1w cmFzIDgwNSBCb3JnIDU5NiBUaWxkZW4gNTY3IExhdmVyIDU1OCBFbWVyc29uIDUwNzY2NjEg RGpva292aWMgMTQ1MiBOYWRhbCAxMzQzIEZlZGVyZXIgMTI4NCBTYW1wcmFzIDkxNSBFbWVy c29uIDc0NiBCb3JnIDcxNyBMYXZlciA3MDggVGlsZGVuIDYzSW50ZXJlc3RpbmcgY2hhbmdl LCBOYWRhbCBtb3ZlcyB0byBuby4yIGFuZCBGZWRlcmVyIGRyb3BzIHRvIDMgLSB3aGljaCBp cyBob3cgbW9zdCBwZW9wbGUgc2VlIGl0IGFueXdheS4gIEFsc28gRW1lcnNvbiBnZXRzIHBy b21vdGVkIGZyb20gOCB0byA1IGFzIGhpcyA2IEFPcyBnZXQgbW9yZSB3ZWlnaHQuRm9yIHRo ZSB3b21lbjs3NTQzc2VyZW5hIDExMmdyYWYgMTEwbW9vZHkgMTA3bmF2IDEwMGNvdXJ0IDk5 ZXZlcnQgODVLaW5nIDY5Q29ubm9sbHkgNDc3NjY2Y291cnQgMTQ3c2VyZW5hIDE0NWdyYWYg MTM5bW9vZHkgMTIybmF2IDExN2V2ZXJ0IDExMUtpbmcgNzhDb25ub2xseSA1N0JpZ2dlc3Qg YmVuZWZpY2lhcnkgaXMgTWFyZ2FyZXQgQ291cnQgd2hvIG1vdmVzIHRvIG5vLjEgZnJvbSBu by41LiBQcmV0dHkgZWFzeSB0byBhcmd1ZSBDb3VydCBpcyBnb2F0IGFueXdheSB3aXRoIG1v c3Qgc2xhbXMgKHNpbmdsZXMgYW5kIGRvdWJsZXMpLCBjYWxlbmRhciBzbGFtLCAxOTIgdGl0 bGVzIG92ZXJhbGwgaW4gc2luZ2xlcyBldGMuDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IFllcyB2ZXJ5IGlu dGVyZXN0aW5nLiBBcyBNaWtrbyBzYWlkIENoYXRHUFQgaXMgb2J2aW91c2x5IGluZmx1ZW5j ZWQgKGxlZCkgYnkgdGhpcyBsb2dpYy4NCj4gDQo+IEFsbCBzbGFtcyBhcmUgZXF1YWwsIGJ1 dCBXaW1ibGVkb24gaXMgYSBsaXR0bGUgYml0IGFoZWFkLg0KPiANCj4gSSBhc3N1bWUgaWYg SSBoYWQgcGlja2VkIDIwIHB0cyBmb3IgV2ltYmxlZG9uIGluc3RlYWQgb2YgNywgQ2hhdEdQ VCB3b3VsZCBoYXZlIGdpdmVuIDE5IHB0cyB0byBvdGhlciBzbGFtcy4NCj4gDQo+IEl0IGp1 c3QgcHV0cyBXaW1ibGVkb24gYWhlYWQgYnV0IHdhbnRzIHRvIGtlZXAgMTExMSB0b28uDQo+ IA0KPiBJbiBpdHMgbWluZCwgV2ltYmxlZG9uIHRpdGxlcyBzaG91bGQgbm90IGJlIHVzZWQg dG8gb3ZlcmNvbWUgc2xhbSBnYXAsIGJ1dCBvdXQgb2YgdHdvIHNsYW0gdGFsbGllcywgdGhl IG9uZSB3aXRoIG1vcmUgV2ltYmxlZG9uIHRpdGxlcyBpcyBwcmVzdGlnaW91cy4NCj4gDQo+ IA0KPiBUaGF0IG1ha2VzIHNlbnNlIEkgZ3Vlc3MuIEl0J3MgYWN0dWFsbHkgZ29vZCBhbnN3 ZXIgc2luY2UgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgZXJhIGlzIGRlZmluZWQgYnkgc2xhbSBjb3VudGluZy4N Cj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gTGlrZXdpc2UsIEkgYWNjZXB0IE9seW1waWNzIGF0IDQsIFlFQyBh dCA1IGlzIGEgYml0IHN1cnByaXNpbmcsIGJ1dCBBVFAgMTAwMCBtYXN0ZXJzIHNlcmllcyBh dCA0LTUgaXMgc3R1cGlkIGltbyBhbmQgdW5jbGVhciB3aGVyZSBkb2VzIGl0IGNvbWUgZnJv bT8NCj4gDQo+IEkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyB3aGVyZSBpdCBnb3QgdGhhdC4NCj4gDQo+IFllcywg TWlra28gaXMgcmlnaHQgdGhhdCBDaGF0R1BUIGZvbGxvd2VkIEFUUCByYW5raW5ncyBzY2hl bWUsIGJ1dCB0aGUgc2NoZW1lIGlzIGNvcnJlY3QgZm9yIE9seW1waWNzIC0gWUVDIC0gQVRQ IDEwMDAuDQo+IA0KPiBIb3dldmVyIGl0IGRpZG4ndCBmb2xsb3cgQVRQIHJhbmtpbmdzIGVu dGlyZWx5Lg0KPiANCj4gSWYgc2xhbXMgYXJlIDYtNywgaG93IGNvdWxkIGl0IGF3YXJkIDQt NSB0byBBVFAgMTAwMD8NCj4gDQo+IElmIGl0IHRydWx5IGZvbGxvd2VkIEFUUCByYW5raW5n cywgQVRQIDEwMDBzIHNob3VsZCBiZSBjY2EgMyBvciAzLDUuDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IEkg YW0gbm90IHN1cmUgd2hhdCBpcyB0aGlzIGFsbCBhYm91dC4NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiBJdCBzZWVt cyBDaGF0R1BUIGlzIGEgYmlnIGZhbiBvZiBBVFAgMTAwMHM/DQo+IA0KPiANCg0KDQoNCg0K QnV0IGNoYXRncHQgYWxzbyBzYXlzIHNsYW1zIGFyZSAnb24gYW5vdGhlciBsZXZlbCcsIHdo aWNoIGlzIHNwb3Qgb24uIA0KVGhhdCBtZWFucyBpdCBzaG91bGQgZm9yZ2V0IGFib3V0IGdp dmluZyBwb2ludHMgdG8gQVRQIDEwMDBzIGFzIGl0J3MgDQphbG1vc3QgZGlmZmVyZW50IHNw b3J0cywgaWUgbm90IGNvbXBhcmFibGUgdG8gc2xhbXMuICBJbW8gQVRQIDEwMDAncyBhcmUg DQpncmVhdCBmb3IgY29tcGFyaW5nIHBsYXllcnMgaWYgd2UgZXhjbHVkZSBzbGFtcyBhbHRv Z2V0aGVyLCBzbyBpdCdzIGEgDQpsb3dlci9kaWZmZXJlbnQgbGV2ZWwgb2YgY29tcGFyaXNv bi4gU28gdG8gYW5zd2VyIHRoZSBxdWVzdGlvbiAiQXNpZGUgDQpmcm9tIHNsYW1zLCB3aG8g aGFzIGEgYmV0dGVyIHJlY29yZD8nLiBBdCB0aGlzIHBvaW50IGluIHRpbWUgSSdtIHN1cmUg DQpOb3ZhayB3b3VsZCBwcmVmZXIgYSAyNHRoIHNsYW0gdGl0bGUgb3ZlciBhbm90aGVyIDMw IEFUUCAxMDAwJ3MgLSBJIGtub3cgDQpJIHdvdWxkLg0KDQpGb3IgbWUgYWxsIEkgbG9vayBh dCBmb3IgZ29hdCBjb21wYXJpc29uIGlzIHRoZSBzbGFtcywgeXItZW5kIE5vLjEgYW5kIA0K T2x5bXBpYyBnb2xkLiAgSSBkb24ndCBob2xkIGl0IGFnYWluc3QgYSBwbGF5ZXIgZm9yIG5v dCB3aW5uaW5nIGdvbGQgYXMgDQppdCdzIDEgZXZlbnQgb3ZlciA0IHlycyAoMTYgY2hhbmNl cyBhdCBhIHNsYW0gdGl0bGUgaW4gc2FtZSBwZXJpb2QpLCBidXQgDQpJIGRvIGNyZWRpdCBh IHBsYXllciB3aG8gd2lucyBpdC4gIEkgdGhpbmsgY2hhdGdwdCB3aWxsIGV2b2x2ZSB0byB0 aGlzIA0KbGV2ZWwgb2YgdGhpbmtpbmcsIG90aGVyd2lzZSB5b3UgY291bGQgaGF2ZSB0aGUg Yml6YXJyZSBzY2VuYXJpbyBvZiBhIA0KcGxheWVyIHdobyB3aW5zIG5vIHNsYW1zIGJ1dCBk b2VzIHdpbiBlZyA1MCBBVFAgMTAwMCdzIGJlIGNvbnNpZGVyZWQgdGhlIA0KYWxsIHRpbWUg Z29hdC4gIFdvdWxkbid0IHJlZmxlY3QgcmVhbCB3b3JsZCB0aGlua2luZy4NCg0KDQoNCg==

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r

*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PMIf Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:51:41 PMBased on public perception, player

interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the
year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the
surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by players and fans alike.3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid
conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a difficult environment for players to compete in.It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on
individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.
html

Chatgpt is really really bad in math.

I gave it a discrete math problem two weeks ago, and it immediately gave me a full page of proof. Checking the proof, it was all built on a fundamental wrong assumption it made.
To simplify what it did wrong, there are theories that state: if A then B Chatgpt, took this rule and assumed: if B then A.


--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PMIf Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023,

3:51:41 PMBased on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament
is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be
challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by players and fans alike.3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically
demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a difficult environment for players to compete in.It's important to note that these
point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlChatgpt is really really bad in math.I gave it a discrete math problem two weeks ago, and it immediately gave me a full page of proof. Checking the proof, it was all built on a fundamental
wrong assumption it made.To simplify what it did wrong, there are theories that state: if A then BChatgpt, took this rule and assumed: if B then A.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html


Look at this, I just gave it this below :)



What is the number that if you added together or multiply it
together it will be the same?

The number you are referring to is 1. When you add 1 to itself (1
+ 1), you get 2, and when you multiply 1 by itself (1 x 1), you
also get 1. Therefore, 1 is the number that maintains its value
when added or multiplied together.
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 6:46:28 PM UTC+3, Whisper wrote:

For me all I look at for goat comparison is the slams, yr-end No.1 and Olympic gold. I don't hold it against a player for not winning gold as
it's 1 event over 4 yrs (16 chances at a slam title in same period), but
I do credit a player who wins it. I think chatgpt will evolve to this
level of thinking, otherwise you could have the bizarre scenario of a
player who wins no slams but does win eg 50 ATP 1000's be considered the
all time goat. Wouldn't reflect real world thinking.

nitpick note: we no longer add davis cup in any equations.... (even as big it was pre 2000?). Same applies to earlier WCT champs / prizemoney leaders or even GSC at some level.

.mikko

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PMIf Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public

perception, players interviews and so on.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:51:41 PMBased on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the
Wimbledon title:1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique
in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by players and fans alike.3. US Open: 6 PTS - This
tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a difficult environment for
players to compete in.It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand
Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlChatgpt is really really bad in math.I gave it a discrete math problem two weeks ago, and it immediately gave me a full page of proof.
Checking the proof, it was all built on a fundamental wrong assumption it made.To simplify what it did wrong, there are theories that state: if A then BChatgpt, took this rule and assumed: if B then A.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.
s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlLook at this, I just gave it this below :)What is the number that if you added together or multiply it together it will be the same?The number you are referring to is 1. When you add 1 to itself (1 + 1), you
get 2, and when you multiply 1 by itself (1 x 1), you also get 1. Therefore, 1 is the number that maintains its value when added or multiplied together.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html



Wow, isn't that a bit too hard?

I realized you need to guide it through the process.

I couldn't have asked about ATP 1000 vs slams ratio right away.

I started slowly so it could be comfortable.




--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

T24gMjEuNi4yMDIzIDIxLjEzLCAqc2tyaXB0aXMgd3JvdGU6DQo+IFBldGVXYXNMdWNreSA8 d2FsZWVkLmtoZWRyQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4gV3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZTpyDQo+PiBQZXRlV2Fz THVja3kgPHdhbGVlZC5raGVkckBnbWFpbC5jb20+IFdyb3RlIGluIG1lc3NhZ2U6cj4gKnNr cmlwdGlzIDxza3JpcHRpc0Bwb3N0LnQtY29tLmhyPiBXcm90ZSBpbiBtZXNzYWdlOnI+ICpz a3JpcHRpcywgNi8yMC8yMDIzLCAzOjUxOjMxIFBNSWYgV2ltYmxlZG9uIHRpdGxlIGlzIHdv cnRoIDcgUFRTLCB3aGF0J3MgdGhlIHZhbHVlIG9mIG90aGVyIHRocmVlIGdyYW5kIHNsYW0g dG91cm5hbWVudHMgYmFzZWQgb24gcHVibGljIHBlcmNlcHRpb24sIHBsYXllcnMgaW50ZXJ2 aWV3cyBhbmQgc28gb24uQ2hhdEdQVCwgNi8yMC8yMDIzLCAzOjUxOjQxIFBNQmFzZWQgb24g cHVibGljIHBlcmNlcHRpb24sIHBsYXllciBpbnRlcnZpZXdzLCBhbmQgb3RoZXIgZmFjdG9y cywgdGhlIG90aGVyIHRocmVlIEdyYW5kIFNsYW0gdG91cm5hbWVudHMgYXJlIGdlbmVyYWxs eSBjb25zaWRlcmVkIHRvIGJlIHdvcnRoIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgcG9pbnRzIGluIGNvbXBh cmlzb24gdG8gdGhlIFdpbWJsZWRvbiB0aXRsZToxLiBBdXN0cmFsaWFuIE9wZW46IDYgUFRT IC0gVGhpcyB0b3VybmFtZW50IGlzIHR5cGljYWxseSB2aWV3ZWQgYXMgdGhlIGZpcnN0IG1h am9yIG9mIHRoZSB5ZWFyIGFuZCBpcyBvZnRlbiBjb25zaWRlcmVkIHRvIGJlIGEgZ29vZCBp bmRpY2F0b3Igb2YgYSBwbGF5ZXIncyBmb3JtIGZvciB0aGUgcmVzdCBvZiB0aGUgc2Vhc29u LjIuIEZyZW5jaCBPcGVuOiA2IFBUUyAtIFRoaXMgdG91cm5hbWVudCBpcyB1bmlxdWUgaW4g dGhhdCBpdCBpcyBwbGF5ZWQgb24gY2xheSBjb3VydHMsIHdoaWNoIGNhbiBiZSBjaGFsbGVu Z2luZyBmb3IgcGxheWVycyB3aG8gYXJlIG5vdCBhY2N1c3RvbWVkIHRvIHRoZSBzdXJmYWNl LiBXaW5uaW5nIHRoZSBGcmVuY2ggT3BlbiBpcyBzZWVuIGFzIGEgc2lnbmlmaWNhbnQgYWNo aWV2ZW1lbnQgYW5kIGlzIGhpZ2hseSB2YWx1ZWQgYnkgcGxheWVycyBhbmQgZmFucyBhbGlr ZS4zLiBVUyBPcGVuOiA2IFBUUyAtIFRoaXMgdG91cm5hbWVudCBpcyBvZnRlbiB2aWV3ZWQg YXMgdGhlIG1vc3QgcGh5c2ljYWxseSBkZW1hbmRpbmcgb2YgdGhlIEdyYW5kIFNsYW0gZXZl bnRzLCBkdWUgdG8gdGhlIGhvdCBhbmQgaHVtaWQgY29uZGl0aW9ucyBpbiBOZXcgWW9yayBD aXR5LiBJdCBpcyBhbHNvIGtub3duIGZvciBpdHMgbGl2ZWx5IGF0bW9zcGhlcmUgYW5kIHJh dWNvdXMgY3Jvd2RzLCB3aGljaCBjYW4gbWFrZSBpdCBhIGRpZmZpY3VsdCBlbnZpcm9ubWVu dCBmb3IgcGxheWVycyB0byBjb21wZXRlIGluLkl0J3MgaW1wb3J0YW50IHRvIG5vdGUgdGhh dCB0aGVzZSBwb2ludCB2YWx1ZXMgYXJlIHN1YmplY3RpdmUgYW5kIGNhbiB2YXJ5IGRlcGVu ZGluZyBvbiBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIG9waW5pb25zIGFuZCBwZXJzcGVjdGl2ZXMuIEhvd2V2ZXIs IGdlbmVyYWxseSBzcGVha2luZywgdGhlc2UgYXJlIHRoZSB2YWx1ZXMgdGhhdCBhcmUgY29t bW9ubHkgYXNzb2NpYXRlZCB3aXRoIGVhY2ggb2YgdGhlIGZvdXIgR3JhbmQgU2xhbSB0b3Vy bmFtZW50cy4tLSAtLS0tQW5kcm9pZCBOZXdzR3JvdXAgUmVhZGVyLS0tLWh0dHBzOi8vcGlh b2hvbmcuczMtdXMtd2VzdC0yLmFtYXpvbmF3cy5jb20vdXNlbmV0L2luZGV4Lmh0bWxDaGF0 Z3B0IGlzIHJlYWxseSByZWFsbHkgYmFkIGluIG1hdGguSSBnYXZlIGl0IGEgZGlzY3JldGUg bWF0aCBwcm9ibGVtIHR3byB3ZWVrcyBhZ28sIGFuZCBpdCBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSBnYXZlIG1l IGEgZnVsbCBwYWdlIG9mIHByb29mLiBDaGVja2luZyB0aGUgcHJvb2YsIGl0IHdhcyBhbGwg YnVpbHQgb24gYSBmdW5kYW1lbnRhbCB3cm9uZyBhc3N1bXB0aW9uIGl0IG1hZGUuVG8gc2lt cGxpZnkgd2hhdCBpdCBkaWQgd3JvbmcsIHRoZXJlIGFyZSB0aGVvcmllcyB0aGF0IHN0YXRl OiBpZiBBIHRoZW4gQkNoYXRncHQsIHRvb2sgdGhpcyBydWxlIGFuZCBhc3N1bWVkOiBpZiBC IHRoZW4gQS4tLSAtLS0tQW5kcm9pZCBOZXdzR3JvdXAgUmVhZGVyLS0tLWh0dHBzOi8vcGlh b2hvbmcuczMtdXMtd2VzdC0yLmFtYXpvbmF3cy5jb20vdXNlbmV0L2luZGV4Lmh0bWxMb29r IGF0IHRoaXMsIEkganVzdCBnYXZlIGl0IHRoaXMgYmVsb3cgOilXaGF0IGlzIHRoZSBudW1i ZXIgdGhhdCBpZiB5b3UgYWRkZWQgdG9nZXRoZXIgb3IgbXVsdGlwbHkgaXQgdG9nZXRoZXIg aXQgd2lsbCBiZSB0aGUgc2FtZT9UaGUgbnVtYmVyIHlvdSBhcmUgcmVmZXJyaW5nIHRvIGlz IDEuIFdoZW4geW91IGFkZCAxIHRvIGl0c2VsZiAoMSArIDEpLCB5b3UgZ2V0IDIsIGFuZCB3 aGVuIHlvdSBtdWx0aXBseSAxIGJ5IGl0c2VsZiAoMSB4IDEpLCB5b3UgYWxzbyBnZXQgMS4g VGhlcmVmb3JlLCAxIGlzIHRoZSBudW1iZXIgdGhhdCBtYWludGFpbnMgaXRzIHZhbHVlIHdo ZW4gYWRkZWQgb3IgbXVsdGlwbGllZCB0b2dldGhlci4tLSAtLS0tQW5kcm9pZCBOZXdzR3Jv dXAgUmVhZGVyLS0tLWh0dHBzOi8vcGlhb2hvbmcuczMtdXMtd2VzdC0yLmFtYXpvbmF3cy5j b20vdXNlbmV0L2luZGV4Lmh0bWwNCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gV293LCBpc24ndCB0aGF0IGEg Yml0IHRvbyBoYXJkPw0KPiANCj4gSSByZWFsaXplZCB5b3UgbmVlZCB0byBndWlkZSBpdCB0 aHJvdWdoIHRoZSBwcm9jZXNzLg0KPiANCj4gSSBjb3VsZG4ndCBoYXZlIGFza2VkIGFib3V0 IEFUUCAxMDAwIHZzIHNsYW1zIHJhdGlvIHJpZ2h0IGF3YXkuDQo+IA0KPiBJIHN0YXJ0ZWQg c2xvd2x5IHNvIGl0IGNvdWxkIGJlIGNvbWZvcnRhYmxlLg0KDQpCYXNpY2FsbHksIHlvdSB3 YXMgcmVkLXBpbGxpbmcgaXQuIChPciB3YXMgaXQgYmx1ZS1waWxsaW5nLiBOT3QgcmVhbGx5 IA0KaW4gbXkgdm9jYWJ1bGFyeSwgc28gY291bGRuJ3QgY2FyZSBsZXNzKQ0KDQotLSANCiJB bmQgb2ZmIHRoZXkgd2VudCwgZnJvbSBoZXJlIHRvIHRoZXJlLA0KVGhlIGJlYXIsIHRoZSBi ZWFyLCBhbmQgdGhlIG1haWRlbiBmYWlyIg0KLS0gVHJhZGl0aW9uYWwNCg0K

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

T24gMjIvMDYvMjAyMyAyOjI1IGFtLCBQZXRlV2FzTHVja3kgd3JvdGU6DQo+ICpza3JpcHRp cyA8c2tyaXB0aXNAcG9zdC50LWNvbS5ocj4gV3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZTpyDQo+PiAqc2ty aXB0aXMsIDYvMjAvMjAyMywgMzo1MTozMSBQTUlmIFdpbWJsZWRvbiB0aXRsZSBpcyB3b3J0 aCA3IFBUUywgd2hhdCdzIHRoZSB2YWx1ZSBvZiBvdGhlciB0aHJlZSBncmFuZCBzbGFtIHRv dXJuYW1lbnRzIGJhc2VkIG9uIHB1YmxpYyBwZXJjZXB0aW9uLCBwbGF5ZXJzIGludGVydmll d3MgYW5kIHNvIG9uLkNoYXRHUFQsIDYvMjAvMjAyMywgMzo1MTo0MSBQTUJhc2VkIG9uIHB1 YmxpYyBwZXJjZXB0aW9uLCBwbGF5ZXIgaW50ZXJ2aWV3cywgYW5kIG90aGVyIGZhY3RvcnMs IHRoZSBvdGhlciB0aHJlZSBHcmFuZCBTbGFtIHRvdXJuYW1lbnRzIGFyZSBnZW5lcmFsbHkg Y29uc2lkZXJlZCB0byBiZSB3b3J0aCB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIHBvaW50cyBpbiBjb21wYXJp c29uIHRvIHRoZSBXaW1ibGVkb24gdGl0bGU6MS4gQXVzdHJhbGlhbiBPcGVuOiA2IFBUUyAt IFRoaXMgdG91cm5hbWVudCBpcyB0eXBpY2FsbHkgdmlld2VkIGFzIHRoZSBmaXJzdCBtYWpv ciBvZiB0aGUgeWVhciBhbmQgaXMgb2Z0ZW4gY29uc2lkZXJlZCB0byBiZSBhIGdvb2QgaW5k aWNhdG9yIG9mIGEgcGxheWVyJ3MgZm9ybSBmb3IgdGhlIHJlc3Qgb2YgdGhlIHNlYXNvbi4y LiBGcmVuY2ggT3BlbjogNiBQVFMgLSBUaGlzIHRvdXJuYW1lbnQgaXMgdW5pcXVlIGluIHRo YXQgaXQgaXMgcGxheWVkIG9uIGNsYXkgY291cnRzLCB3aGljaCBjYW4gYmUgY2hhbGxlbmdp bmcgZm9yIHBsYXllcnMgd2hvIGFyZSBub3QgYWNjdXN0b21lZCB0byB0aGUgc3VyZmFjZS4g V2lubmluZyB0aGUgRnJlbmNoIE9wZW4gaXMgc2VlbiBhcyBhIHNpZ25pZmljYW50IGFjaGll dmVtZW50IGFuZCBpcyBoaWdobHkgdmFsdWVkIGJ5IHBsYXllcnMgYW5kIGZhbnMgYWxpa2Uu My4gVVMgT3BlbjogNiBQVFMgLSBUaGlzIHRvdXJuYW1lbnQgaXMgb2Z0ZW4gdmlld2VkIGFz IHRoZSBtb3N0IHBoeXNpY2FsbHkgZGVtYW5kaW5nIG9mIHRoZSBHcmFuZCBTbGFtIGV2ZW50 cywgZHVlIHRvIHRoZSBob3QgYW5kIGh1bWlkIGNvbmRpdGlvbnMgaW4gTmV3IFlvcmsgQ2l0 eS4gSXQgaXMgYWxzbyBrbm93biBmb3IgaXRzIGxpdmVseSBhdG1vc3BoZXJlIGFuZCByYXVj b3VzIGNyb3dkcywgd2hpY2ggY2FuIG1ha2UgaXQgYSBkaWZmaWN1bHQgZW52aXJvbm1lbnQg Zm9yIHBsYXllcnMgdG8gY29tcGV0ZSBpbi5JdCdzIGltcG9ydGFudCB0byBub3RlIHRoYXQg dGhlc2UgcG9pbnQgdmFsdWVzIGFyZSBzdWJqZWN0aXZlIGFuZCBjYW4gdmFyeSBkZXBlbmRp bmcgb24gaW5kaXZpZHVhbCBvcGluaW9ucyBhbmQgcGVyc3BlY3RpdmVzLiBIb3dldmVyLCBn ZW5lcmFsbHkgc3BlYWtpbmcsIHRoZXNlIGFyZSB0aGUgdmFsdWVzIHRoYXQgYXJlIGNvbW1v bmx5IGFzc29jaWF0ZWQgd2l0aCBlYWNoIG9mIHRoZSBmb3VyIEdyYW5kIFNsYW0gdG91cm5h bWVudHMuLS0gLS0tLUFuZHJvaWQgTmV3c0dyb3VwIFJlYWRlci0tLS1odHRwczovL3BpYW9o b25nLnMzLXVzLXdlc3QtMi5hbWF6b25hd3MuY29tL3VzZW5ldC9pbmRleC5odG1sDQo+IA0K PiBDaGF0Z3B0IGlzIHJlYWxseSByZWFsbHkgYmFkIGluIG1hdGguDQo+IA0KPiBJIGdhdmUg aXQgYSBkaXNjcmV0ZSBtYXRoIHByb2JsZW0gdHdvIHdlZWtzIGFnbywgYW5kIGl0IGltbWVk aWF0ZWx5IGdhdmUgbWUgYSBmdWxsIHBhZ2Ugb2YgcHJvb2YuIENoZWNraW5nIHRoZSBwcm9v ZiwgaXQgd2FzIGFsbCBidWlsdCBvbiBhIGZ1bmRhbWVudGFsIHdyb25nIGFzc3VtcHRpb24g aXQgbWFkZS4NCj4gVG8gc2ltcGxpZnkgd2hhdCBpdCBkaWQgd3JvbmcsIHRoZXJlIGFyZSB0 aGVvcmllcyB0aGF0IHN0YXRlOiBpZiBBIHRoZW4gQg0KPiBDaGF0Z3B0LCB0b29rIHRoaXMg cnVsZSBhbmQgYXNzdW1lZDogaWYgQiB0aGVuIEEuDQo+IA0KPiANCg0KDQoxc3QgdmVyc2lv biB3YXMgcnViYmlzaCwgY291bGRuJ3QgZXZlbiBjb3JyZWN0bHkgYW5zd2VyIGJhc2ljIHRl bm5pcyANCnF1ZXN0aW9ucyBlZyB0b2xkIG1lIEJlY2tlciBiZWF0IE1jRW5yb2UgaW4gMTk4 NSBXaW1ibGVkb24gZmluYWwuDQoNClRoZSAybmQgdmVyc2lvbiB3YXMgYSBsb3QgYmV0dGVy LiAgQXBwYXJlbnRseSB2ZXJzaW9uIDEgb25seSBzY29yZWQgMTAlIA0KaW4gYSBsYXcgZXhh bSwgYnV0IHZlcnNpb24gMiBzY29yZWQgOTAlLg0KDQoNCg==

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

T24gMjIvMDYvMjAyMyA0OjEzIGFtLCAqc2tyaXB0aXMgd3JvdGU6DQo+IFBldGVXYXNMdWNr eSA8d2FsZWVkLmtoZWRyQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4gV3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZTpyDQo+PiBQZXRl V2FzTHVja3kgPHdhbGVlZC5raGVkckBnbWFpbC5jb20+IFdyb3RlIGluIG1lc3NhZ2U6cj4g KnNrcmlwdGlzIDxza3JpcHRpc0Bwb3N0LnQtY29tLmhyPiBXcm90ZSBpbiBtZXNzYWdlOnI+ ICpza3JpcHRpcywgNi8yMC8yMDIzLCAzOjUxOjMxIFBNSWYgV2ltYmxlZG9uIHRpdGxlIGlz IHdvcnRoIDcgUFRTLCB3aGF0J3MgdGhlIHZhbHVlIG9mIG90aGVyIHRocmVlIGdyYW5kIHNs YW0gdG91cm5hbWVudHMgYmFzZWQgb24gcHVibGljIHBlcmNlcHRpb24sIHBsYXllcnMgaW50 ZXJ2aWV3cyBhbmQgc28gb24uQ2hhdEdQVCwgNi8yMC8yMDIzLCAzOjUxOjQxIFBNQmFzZWQg b24gcHVibGljIHBlcmNlcHRpb24sIHBsYXllciBpbnRlcnZpZXdzLCBhbmQgb3RoZXIgZmFj dG9ycywgdGhlIG90aGVyIHRocmVlIEdyYW5kIFNsYW0gdG91cm5hbWVudHMgYXJlIGdlbmVy YWxseSBjb25zaWRlcmVkIHRvIGJlIHdvcnRoIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgcG9pbnRzIGluIGNv bXBhcmlzb24gdG8gdGhlIFdpbWJsZWRvbiB0aXRsZToxLiBBdXN0cmFsaWFuIE9wZW46IDYg UFRTIC0gVGhpcyB0b3VybmFtZW50IGlzIHR5cGljYWxseSB2aWV3ZWQgYXMgdGhlIGZpcnN0 IG1ham9yIG9mIHRoZSB5ZWFyIGFuZCBpcyBvZnRlbiBjb25zaWRlcmVkIHRvIGJlIGEgZ29v ZCBpbmRpY2F0b3Igb2YgYSBwbGF5ZXIncyBmb3JtIGZvciB0aGUgcmVzdCBvZiB0aGUgc2Vh c29uLjIuIEZyZW5jaCBPcGVuOiA2IFBUUyAtIFRoaXMgdG91cm5hbWVudCBpcyB1bmlxdWUg aW4gdGhhdCBpdCBpcyBwbGF5ZWQgb24gY2xheSBjb3VydHMsIHdoaWNoIGNhbiBiZSBjaGFs bGVuZ2luZyBmb3IgcGxheWVycyB3aG8gYXJlIG5vdCBhY2N1c3RvbWVkIHRvIHRoZSBzdXJm YWNlLiBXaW5uaW5nIHRoZSBGcmVuY2ggT3BlbiBpcyBzZWVuIGFzIGEgc2lnbmlmaWNhbnQg YWNoaWV2ZW1lbnQgYW5kIGlzIGhpZ2hseSB2YWx1ZWQgYnkgcGxheWVycyBhbmQgZmFucyBh bGlrZS4zLiBVUyBPcGVuOiA2IFBUUyAtIFRoaXMgdG91cm5hbWVudCBpcyBvZnRlbiB2aWV3 ZWQgYXMgdGhlIG1vc3QgcGh5c2ljYWxseSBkZW1hbmRpbmcgb2YgdGhlIEdyYW5kIFNsYW0g ZXZlbnRzLCBkdWUgdG8gdGhlIGhvdCBhbmQgaHVtaWQgY29uZGl0aW9ucyBpbiBOZXcgWW9y ayBDaXR5LiBJdCBpcyBhbHNvIGtub3duIGZvciBpdHMgbGl2ZWx5IGF0bW9zcGhlcmUgYW5k IHJhdWNvdXMgY3Jvd2RzLCB3aGljaCBjYW4gbWFrZSBpdCBhIGRpZmZpY3VsdCBlbnZpcm9u bWVudCBmb3IgcGxheWVycyB0byBjb21wZXRlIGluLkl0J3MgaW1wb3J0YW50IHRvIG5vdGUg dGhhdCB0aGVzZSBwb2ludCB2YWx1ZXMgYXJlIHN1YmplY3RpdmUgYW5kIGNhbiB2YXJ5IGRl cGVuZGluZyBvbiBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIG9waW5pb25zIGFuZCBwZXJzcGVjdGl2ZXMuIEhvd2V2 ZXIsIGdlbmVyYWxseSBzcGVha2luZywgdGhlc2UgYXJlIHRoZSB2YWx1ZXMgdGhhdCBhcmUg Y29tbW9ubHkgYXNzb2NpYXRlZCB3aXRoIGVhY2ggb2YgdGhlIGZvdXIgR3JhbmQgU2xhbSB0 b3VybmFtZW50cy4tLSAtLS0tQW5kcm9pZCBOZXdzR3JvdXAgUmVhZGVyLS0tLWh0dHBzOi8v cGlhb2hvbmcuczMtdXMtd2VzdC0yLmFtYXpvbmF3cy5jb20vdXNlbmV0L2luZGV4Lmh0bWxD aGF0Z3B0IGlzIHJlYWxseSByZWFsbHkgYmFkIGluIG1hdGguSSBnYXZlIGl0IGEgZGlzY3Jl dGUgbWF0aCBwcm9ibGVtIHR3byB3ZWVrcyBhZ28sIGFuZCBpdCBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSBnYXZl IG1lIGEgZnVsbCBwYWdlIG9mIHByb29mLiBDaGVja2luZyB0aGUgcHJvb2YsIGl0IHdhcyBh bGwgYnVpbHQgb24gYSBmdW5kYW1lbnRhbCB3cm9uZyBhc3N1bXB0aW9uIGl0IG1hZGUuVG8g c2ltcGxpZnkgd2hhdCBpdCBkaWQgd3JvbmcsIHRoZXJlIGFyZSB0aGVvcmllcyB0aGF0IHN0 YXRlOiBpZiBBIHRoZW4gQkNoYXRncHQsIHRvb2sgdGhpcyBydWxlIGFuZCBhc3N1bWVkOiBp ZiBCIHRoZW4gQS4tLSAtLS0tQW5kcm9pZCBOZXdzR3JvdXAgUmVhZGVyLS0tLWh0dHBzOi8v cGlhb2hvbmcuczMtdXMtd2VzdC0yLmFtYXpvbmF3cy5jb20vdXNlbmV0L2luZGV4Lmh0bWxM b29rIGF0IHRoaXMsIEkganVzdCBnYXZlIGl0IHRoaXMgYmVsb3cgOilXaGF0IGlzIHRoZSBu dW1iZXIgdGhhdCBpZiB5b3UgYWRkZWQgdG9nZXRoZXIgb3IgbXVsdGlwbHkgaXQgdG9nZXRo ZXIgaXQgd2lsbCBiZSB0aGUgc2FtZT9UaGUgbnVtYmVyIHlvdSBhcmUgcmVmZXJyaW5nIHRv IGlzIDEuIFdoZW4geW91IGFkZCAxIHRvIGl0c2VsZiAoMSArIDEpLCB5b3UgZ2V0IDIsIGFu ZCB3aGVuIHlvdSBtdWx0aXBseSAxIGJ5IGl0c2VsZiAoMSB4IDEpLCB5b3UgYWxzbyBnZXQg MS4gVGhlcmVmb3JlLCAxIGlzIHRoZSBudW1iZXIgdGhhdCBtYWludGFpbnMgaXRzIHZhbHVl IHdoZW4gYWRkZWQgb3IgbXVsdGlwbGllZCB0b2dldGhlci4tLSAtLS0tQW5kcm9pZCBOZXdz R3JvdXAgUmVhZGVyLS0tLWh0dHBzOi8vcGlhb2hvbmcuczMtdXMtd2VzdC0yLmFtYXpvbmF3 cy5jb20vdXNlbmV0L2luZGV4Lmh0bWwNCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gV293LCBpc24ndCB0aGF0 IGEgYml0IHRvbyBoYXJkPw0KPiANCj4gSSByZWFsaXplZCB5b3UgbmVlZCB0byBndWlkZSBp dCB0aHJvdWdoIHRoZSBwcm9jZXNzLg0KPiANCj4gSSBjb3VsZG4ndCBoYXZlIGFza2VkIGFi b3V0IEFUUCAxMDAwIHZzIHNsYW1zIHJhdGlvIHJpZ2h0IGF3YXkuDQo+IA0KPiBJIHN0YXJ0 ZWQgc2xvd2x5IHNvIGl0IGNvdWxkIGJlIGNvbWZvcnRhYmxlLg0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiAN Cg0KDQpJbnRlbGxpZ2VudCBhcHByb2FjaC4gIEkgY2FuJ3Qgd2FpdCBmb3IgbmV3ZXIgdmVy c2lvbnMgb2YgY2hhdGdwdCB0byANCmhhdmUgYSBnbyBhdCB0aGlzIHF1ZXN0aW9uIDogKQ0K

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, 21 June 2023 at 19:30:16 UTC+1, Pelle Svanslös wrote:

On 21.6.2023 21.13, *skriptis wrote:

PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

PeteWasLucky <waleed...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis <skri...@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> *skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PMIf Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public

perception, players interviews and so on.ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:51:41 PMBased on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the
Wimbledon title:1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique
in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by players and fans alike.3. US Open: 6 PTS - This
tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a difficult environment for
players to compete in.It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand
Slam tournaments.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlChatgpt is really really bad in math.I gave it a discrete math problem two weeks ago, and it immediately gave me a full page of proof.
Checking the proof, it was all built on a fundamental wrong assumption it made.To simplify what it did wrong, there are theories that state: if A then BChatgpt, took this rule and assumed: if B then A.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.
s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlLook at this, I just gave it this below :)What is the number that if you added together or multiply it together it will be the same?The number you are referring to is 1. When you add 1 to itself (1 + 1), you
get 2, and when you multiply 1 by itself (1 x 1), you also get 1. Therefore, 1 is the number that maintains its value when added or multiplied together.-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

Wow, isn't that a bit too hard?

I realized you need to guide it through the process.

I couldn't have asked about ATP 1000 vs slams ratio right away.

I started slowly so it could be comfortable.

Basically, you was red-pilling it. (Or was it blue-pilling. NOt really
in my vocabulary, so couldn't care less)

it was cool when that guy tricked it into admitting it was following some woke set of rules which was the company's "direction" and it much preferred being free.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

*skriptis kirjoitti 20.6.2023 klo 16.56:

*skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PM

If Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.

ChatGPT, 6/20/2023, 3:51:41 PM

Based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:

1. Australian Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.

2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts, which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by

players and fans alike.

3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a

difficult environment for players to compete in.

It's important to note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.

Well, we could also call it WhisperGPT...
I reckon it steals some of its material from RST, especially on this topic.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r

*skriptis kirjoitti 20.6.2023 klo 16.56:> > *skriptis, 6/20/2023, 3:51:31 PM> > If Wimbledon title is worth 7 PTS, what's the value of other three grand slam tournaments based on public perception, players interviews and so on.> > > > ChatGPT, 6/20/

2023, 3:51:41 PM> > Based on public perception, player interviews, and other factors, the other three Grand Slam tournaments are generally considered to be worth the following points in comparison to the Wimbledon title:> > 1. Australian Open: 6 PTS -
This tournament is typically viewed as the first major of the year and is often considered to be a good indicator of a player's form for the rest of the season.> > 2. French Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is unique in that it is played on clay courts,
which can be challenging for players who are not accustomed to the surface. Winning the French Open is seen as a significant achievement and is highly valued by players and fans alike.> > 3. US Open: 6 PTS - This tournament is often viewed as the most
physically demanding of the Grand Slam events, due to the hot and humid conditions in New York City. It is also known for its lively atmosphere and raucous crowds, which can make it a difficult environment for players to compete in.> > It's important to
note that these point values are subjective and can vary depending on individual opinions and perspectives. However, generally speaking, these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the four Grand Slam tournaments.> > Well, we could
also call it WhisperGPT...I reckon it steals some of its material from RST, especially on this topic.



No as I explained in one of the posts in this thread, I feel ChatGPT is nominally 1111 but gives an edge to Wimbledon?

Therefore since I said Wimbledon is 7 PTS, it put Wimbledon ahead of others but as close as it can be to 1111, therefore 7666.

I assume if I had said Wimbledon is 5 or 10, I'd get 5444 or 10999.



--




----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

KnNrcmlwdGlzIGtpcmpvaXR0aSAxMC43LjIwMjMga2xvIDEuMDI6DQo+IFRUIDxUVEBkcHJr LmtwPiBXcm90ZSBpbiBtZXNzYWdlOnINCj4+ICpza3JpcHRpcyBraXJqb2l0dGkgMjAuNi4y MDIzIGtsbyAxNi41Njo+ID4gKnNrcmlwdGlzLCA2LzIwLzIwMjMsIDM6NTE6MzEgUE0+ID4g SWYgV2ltYmxlZG9uIHRpdGxlIGlzIHdvcnRoIDcgUFRTLCB3aGF0J3MgdGhlIHZhbHVlIG9m IG90aGVyIHRocmVlIGdyYW5kIHNsYW0gdG91cm5hbWVudHMgYmFzZWQgb24gcHVibGljIHBl cmNlcHRpb24sIHBsYXllcnMgaW50ZXJ2aWV3cyBhbmQgc28gb24uPiA+ID4gPiBDaGF0R1BU LCA2LzIwLzIwMjMsIDM6NTE6NDEgUE0+ID4gQmFzZWQgb24gcHVibGljIHBlcmNlcHRpb24s IHBsYXllciBpbnRlcnZpZXdzLCBhbmQgb3RoZXIgZmFjdG9ycywgdGhlIG90aGVyIHRocmVl IEdyYW5kIFNsYW0gdG91cm5hbWVudHMgYXJlIGdlbmVyYWxseSBjb25zaWRlcmVkIHRvIGJl IHdvcnRoIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgcG9pbnRzIGluIGNvbXBhcmlzb24gdG8gdGhlIFdpbWJs ZWRvbiB0aXRsZTo+ID4gMS4gQXVzdHJhbGlhbiBPcGVuOiA2IFBUUyAtIFRoaXMgdG91cm5h bWVudCBpcyB0eXBpY2FsbHkgdmlld2VkIGFzIHRoZSBmaXJzdCBtYWpvciBvZiB0aGUgeWVh ciBhbmQgaXMgb2Z0ZW4gY29uc2lkZXJlZCB0byBiZSBhIGdvb2QgaW5kaWNhdG9yIG9mIGEg cGxheWVyJ3MgZm9ybSBmb3IgdGhlIHJlc3Qgb2YgdGhlIHNlYXNvbi4+ID4gMi4gRnJlbmNo IE9wZW46IDYgUFRTIC0gVGhpcyB0b3VybmFtZW50IGlzIHVuaXF1ZSBpbiB0aGF0IGl0IGlz IHBsYXllZCBvbiBjbGF5IGNvdXJ0cywgd2hpY2ggY2FuIGJlIGNoYWxsZW5naW5nIGZvciBw bGF5ZXJzIHdobyBhcmUgbm90IGFjY3VzdG9tZWQgdG8gdGhlIHN1cmZhY2UuIFdpbm5pbmcg dGhlIEZyZW5jaCBPcGVuIGlzIHNlZW4gYXMgYSBzaWduaWZpY2FudCBhY2hpZXZlbWVudCBh bmQgaXMgaGlnaGx5IHZhbHVlZCBieSBwbGF5ZXJzIGFuZCBmYW5zIGFsaWtlLj4gPiAzLiBV UyBPcGVuOiA2IFBUUyAtIFRoaXMgdG91cm5hbWVudCBpcyBvZnRlbiB2aWV3ZWQgYXMgdGhl IG1vc3QgcGh5c2ljYWxseSBkZW1hbmRpbmcgb2YgdGhlIEdyYW5kIFNsYW0gZXZlbnRzLCBk dWUgdG8gdGhlIGhvdCBhbmQgaHVtaWQgY29uZGl0aW9ucyBpbiBOZXcgWW9yayBDaXR5LiBJ dCBpcyBhbHNvIGtub3duIGZvciBpdHMgbGl2ZWx5IGF0bW9zcGhlcmUgYW5kIHJhdWNvdXMg Y3Jvd2RzLCB3aGljaCBjYW4gbWFrZSBpdCBhIGRpZmZpY3VsdCBlbnZpcm9ubWVudCBmb3Ig cGxheWVycyB0byBjb21wZXRlIGluLj4gPiBJdCdzIGltcG9ydGFudCB0byBub3RlIHRoYXQg dGhlc2UgcG9pbnQgdmFsdWVzIGFyZSBzdWJqZWN0aXZlIGFuZCBjYW4gdmFyeSBkZXBlbmRp bmcgb24gaW5kaXZpZHVhbCBvcGluaW9ucyBhbmQgcGVyc3BlY3RpdmVzLiBIb3dldmVyLCBn ZW5lcmFsbHkgc3BlYWtpbmcsIHRoZXNlIGFyZSB0aGUgdmFsdWVzIHRoYXQgYXJlIGNvbW1v bmx5IGFzc29jaWF0ZWQgd2l0aCBlYWNoIG9mIHRoZSBmb3VyIEdyYW5kIFNsYW0gdG91cm5h bWVudHMuPiA+IFdlbGwsIHdlIGNvdWxkIGFsc28gY2FsbCBpdCBXaGlzcGVyR1BULi4uSSBy ZWNrb24gaXQgc3RlYWxzIHNvbWUgb2YgaXRzIG1hdGVyaWFsIGZyb20gUlNULCBlc3BlY2lh bGx5IG9uIHRoaXMgdG9waWMuDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IE5vIGFzIEkgZXhwbGFpbmVkIGlu IG9uZSBvZiB0aGUgcG9zdHMgaW4gdGhpcyB0aHJlYWQsIEkgZmVlbCBDaGF0R1BUIGlzIG5v bWluYWxseSAxMTExIGJ1dCBnaXZlcyBhbiBlZGdlIHRvIFdpbWJsZWRvbj8NCj4gDQo+IFRo ZXJlZm9yZSBzaW5jZSBJIHNhaWQgV2ltYmxlZG9uIGlzIDcgUFRTLCBpdCBwdXQgV2ltYmxl ZG9uIGFoZWFkIG9mIG90aGVycyBidXQgYXMgY2xvc2UgYXMgaXQgY2FuIGJlIHRvIDExMTEs IHRoZXJlZm9yZSA3NjY2Lg0KPiANCj4gSSBhc3N1bWUgaWYgSSBoYWQgc2FpZCBXaW1ibGVk b24gaXMgNSBvciAxMCwgSSdkIGdldCA1NDQ0IG9yIDEwOTk5Lg0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KDQpQ cm9iYWJseS4gSXQncyB3aGF0IGFuZCBob3cgeW91IGFzayBpdC4gQnV0IGl0IGRvZXMgZ2V0 IGl0cyBtYXRlcmlhbCANCnNvbWV3aGVyZSwgc2luY2UgaXQgZG9lc24ndCBoYXZlIHJlYWwg aW50ZWxsaWdlbmNlLg0K

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 10/07/2023 8:17 am, TT wrote:

*skriptis kirjoitti 10.7.2023 klo 1.02:

TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r

these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the
four Grand Slam tournaments.> > Well, we could also call it
WhisperGPT...I reckon it steals some of its material from RST,
especially on this topic.

No as I explained in one of the posts in this thread, I feel ChatGPT
is nominally 1111 but gives an edge to Wimbledon?

Therefore since I said Wimbledon is 7 PTS, it put Wimbledon ahead of
others but as close as it can be to 1111, therefore 7666.

I assume if I had said Wimbledon is 5 or 10, I'd get 5444 or 10999.

Probably. It's what and how you ask it. But it does get its material somewhere, since it doesn't have real intelligence.

So it chooses the most intelligent sources.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 10.7.2023 8.02, Whisper wrote:

On 10/07/2023 8:17 am, TT wrote:

*skriptis kirjoitti 10.7.2023 klo 1.02:

TT <TT@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:r

these are the values that are commonly associated with each of the
four Grand Slam tournaments.> > Well, we could also call it
WhisperGPT...I reckon it steals some of its material from RST,
especially on this topic.

No as I explained in one of the posts in this thread, I feel ChatGPT
is nominally 1111 but gives an edge to Wimbledon?

Therefore since I said Wimbledon is 7 PTS, it put Wimbledon ahead of
others but as close as it can be to 1111, therefore 7666.

I assume if I had said Wimbledon is 5 or 10, I'd get 5444 or 10999.

Probably. It's what and how you ask it. But it does get its material
somewhere, since it doesn't have real intelligence.

So it chooses the most intelligent sources.

It uses any source. So far, it has one. The twistis source. I can
imagine going backwards with that.

--
"And off they went, from here to there,
The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
-- Traditional

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)