Let's take the bad news first.

Off court, Djokovic is quite a foolish guy. Clearly
worse than your average joe. His off court stupidity
has even affected his tennis career, forcing him
to miss Grand Slam tournaments where he would
have had very good chances of winning. Unbelievable!

And what about the ignorant comments on how you
could alter the molecular structure of liquids
(was it water?) simply using the power of your
*thinking* alone?

Give me a break! That's just ridiculous! :-)


But on a tennis court, I suppose we must call him a
genius. Like in all sports, greatness in tennis is
measured according to your successes and losses. Yes,
many may admire the beauty of Federer's classic tennis
shots, but to me, it is ultimately *winning* that
matters.

I know that Brad Gilbert even wrote a book titled
"Winning Ugly". Tennis umpires will never give you
extra points for your elegant shots, you just
have to win the right points to earn the match
and that's it.

The Roland Garros 2023 men's final is over. Everybody
knows Djokovic's relevant statistics now. My claim
is that Novak Djokovic is the greatest tennis player
of all time. Even before this victory, I had the
same opinion and I certainly was not alone.

Rafa will of course forever remain as the King of Clay.
I am confident that his clay court achievements will
never be surpassed. Those results are almost
miraculous. Surely nobody else can win Roland Garros
14 times! Also think about Rafa's victories on the
ATP1000 Masters played on clay!

Back to Djoker. Novak Djokovic is 36 years old now
and he is still capable of beating everybody, and
he can still win Grand Slam titles. No need to take
my word it because Djoker himself just proved it in
Paris today. What a performance!

In all honesty, I would have preferred Ruud to win,
but I give my congratulations to Djokovic. He played
better tennis and deserved his victory.

You never know, but I am pretty sure that the
championship in French Open 2023 will not be Djoker's
last Grand Slam title. As long as he stays healthy,
he will be among the favourites to win in any
given tournament that he enters.

It really does not matter whether they play on clay,
hard courts, grass, carpet or whatever. This amazing
champion can handle absolutely all different
circumstances.

I don't care whether many centuries will pass,
but Novak Djokovic's greatness just cannot be
paralleled or exceeded.

br,
KK

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 11/06/2023 18:49, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:

Let's take the bad news first.

Off court, Djokovic is quite a foolish guy. Clearly
worse than your average joe. His off court stupidity
has even affected his tennis career, forcing him
to miss Grand Slam tournaments where he would
have had very good chances of winning. Unbelievable!

And what about the ignorant comments on how you
could alter the molecular structure of liquids
(was it water?) simply using the power of your
*thinking* alone?

Give me a break! That's just ridiculous! :-)

But on a tennis court, I suppose we must call him a
genius. Like in all sports, greatness in tennis is
measured according to your successes and losses. Yes,
many may admire the beauty of Federer's classic tennis
shots, but to me, it is ultimately *winning* that
matters.

I know that Brad Gilbert even wrote a book titled
"Winning Ugly". Tennis umpires will never give you
extra points for your elegant shots, you just
have to win the right points to earn the match
and that's it.

The Roland Garros 2023 men's final is over. Everybody
knows Djokovic's relevant statistics now. My claim
is that Novak Djokovic is the greatest tennis player
of all time. Even before this victory, I had the
same opinion and I certainly was not alone.

Rafa will of course forever remain as the King of Clay.
I am confident that his clay court achievements will
never be surpassed. Those results are almost
miraculous. Surely nobody else can win Roland Garros
14 times! Also think about Rafa's victories on the
ATP1000 Masters played on clay!

Back to Djoker. Novak Djokovic is 36 years old now
and he is still capable of beating everybody, and
he can still win Grand Slam titles. No need to take
my word it because Djoker himself just proved it in
Paris today. What a performance!

In all honesty, I would have preferred Ruud to win,
but I give my congratulations to Djokovic. He played
better tennis and deserved his victory.

You never know, but I am pretty sure that the
championship in French Open 2023 will not be Djoker's
last Grand Slam title. As long as he stays healthy,
he will be among the favourites to win in any
given tournament that he enters.

It really does not matter whether they play on clay,
hard courts, grass, carpet or whatever. This amazing
champion can handle absolutely all different
circumstances.

I don't care whether many centuries will pass,
but Novak Djokovic's greatness just cannot be
paralleled or exceeded.

br,
KK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0wZB56TdbE&t=61s

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

grif <griffin_230@hotmail.com> wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0wZB56TdbE&t=61s

What is the point of that video? I really don't give a
damn about basketball or Michael Jordan.

br,
KK

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 11/06/2023 19:55, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:

grif <griffin_230@hotmail.com> wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0wZB56TdbE&t=61s

What is the point of that video? I really don't give a
damn about basketball or Michael Jordan.

br,
KK

Parallels. Parts of that speech felt like it could have been about Djoker.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

grif <griffin_230@hotmail.com> wrote:

Parallels. Parts of that speech felt like it
could have been about Djoker.

Okay, thanks for the clarification. I am sure Michael
Jordan was great in basketball, but I kind of prefer
individual sports like tennis.

Well, I do like tennis doubles, too... and two players
is a minimal team.

br,
KK

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 18:49:06 UTC+1, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:

Let's take the bad news first.

Off court, Djokovic is quite a foolish guy. Clearly
worse than your average joe. His off court stupidity
has even affected his tennis career, forcing him
to miss Grand Slam tournaments where he would
have had very good chances of winning. Unbelievable!

And what about the ignorant comments on how you
could alter the molecular structure of liquids
(was it water?) simply using the power of your
*thinking* alone?

Give me a break! That's just ridiculous! :-)

But on a tennis court, I suppose we must call him a
genius. Like in all sports, greatness in tennis is
measured according to your successes and losses. Yes,
many may admire the beauty of Federer's classic tennis
shots, but to me, it is ultimately *winning* that
matters.

I know that Brad Gilbert even wrote a book titled
"Winning Ugly". Tennis umpires will never give you
extra points for your elegant shots, you just
have to win the right points to earn the match
and that's it.

The Roland Garros 2023 men's final is over. Everybody
knows Djokovic's relevant statistics now. My claim
is that Novak Djokovic is the greatest tennis player
of all time. Even before this victory, I had the
same opinion and I certainly was not alone.

Rafa will of course forever remain as the King of Clay.
I am confident that his clay court achievements will
never be surpassed. Those results are almost
miraculous. Surely nobody else can win Roland Garros
14 times! Also think about Rafa's victories on the
ATP1000 Masters played on clay!

Back to Djoker. Novak Djokovic is 36 years old now
and he is still capable of beating everybody, and
he can still win Grand Slam titles. No need to take
my word it because Djoker himself just proved it in
Paris today. What a performance!

In all honesty, I would have preferred Ruud to win,
but I give my congratulations to Djokovic. He played
better tennis and deserved his victory.

You never know, but I am pretty sure that the
championship in French Open 2023 will not be Djoker's
last Grand Slam title. As long as he stays healthy,
he will be among the favourites to win in any
given tournament that he enters.

It really does not matter whether they play on clay,
hard courts, grass, carpet or whatever. This amazing
champion can handle absolutely all different
circumstances.

I don't care whether many centuries will pass,
but Novak Djokovic's greatness just cannot be
paralleled or exceeded.

br,
KK

this is totally wrong as off-court Djoker MUST 100% be the most sensible guy out there cos he beats everyone else when he gets on court. It's his off-court stuff that means he wins on-court + all the stuff he's said off-court has been very good, he
sensibly didn't get vaxed, drinks water at room temperature only, wants an end to the Kosovo ethnic-cleansing of Serbs and end to the USA provoked war in the Ukraine. What you mean is CNN tells you his stuff about water is wrong so you reckon that's
correct, same with climate change, except they didn't tell you about China not reaching peak CO2 levels until 2030 at the Paris agreement.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 6/12/23 9:50 AM, gap...@gmail.com wrote:

On Monday, June 12, 2023 at 5:17:51 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:

On Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 18:49:06 UTC+1, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:

Let's take the bad news first.

Off court, Djokovic is quite a foolish guy. Clearly
worse than your average joe. His off court stupidity
has even affected his tennis career, forcing him
to miss Grand Slam tournaments where he would
have had very good chances of winning. Unbelievable!

And what about the ignorant comments on how you
could alter the molecular structure of liquids
(was it water?) simply using the power of your
*thinking* alone?

Give me a break! That's just ridiculous! :-)


But on a tennis court, I suppose we must call him a
genius. Like in all sports, greatness in tennis is
measured according to your successes and losses. Yes,
many may admire the beauty of Federer's classic tennis
shots, but to me, it is ultimately *winning* that
matters.

I know that Brad Gilbert even wrote a book titled
"Winning Ugly". Tennis umpires will never give you
extra points for your elegant shots, you just
have to win the right points to earn the match
and that's it.

The Roland Garros 2023 men's final is over. Everybody
knows Djokovic's relevant statistics now. My claim
is that Novak Djokovic is the greatest tennis player
of all time. Even before this victory, I had the
same opinion and I certainly was not alone.

Rafa will of course forever remain as the King of Clay.
I am confident that his clay court achievements will
never be surpassed. Those results are almost
miraculous. Surely nobody else can win Roland Garros
14 times! Also think about Rafa's victories on the
ATP1000 Masters played on clay!

Back to Djoker. Novak Djokovic is 36 years old now
and he is still capable of beating everybody, and
he can still win Grand Slam titles. No need to take
my word it because Djoker himself just proved it in
Paris today. What a performance!

In all honesty, I would have preferred Ruud to win,
but I give my congratulations to Djokovic. He played
better tennis and deserved his victory.

You never know, but I am pretty sure that the
championship in French Open 2023 will not be Djoker's
last Grand Slam title. As long as he stays healthy,
he will be among the favourites to win in any
given tournament that he enters.

It really does not matter whether they play on clay,
hard courts, grass, carpet or whatever. This amazing
champion can handle absolutely all different
circumstances.

I don't care whether many centuries will pass,
but Novak Djokovic's greatness just cannot be
paralleled or exceeded.

br,
KK

this is totally wrong as off-court Djoker MUST 100% be the most sensible guy out there cos he beats everyone else when he gets on court. It's his off-court stuff that means he wins on-court + all the stuff he's said off-court has been very good, he

sensibly didn't get vaxed, drinks water at room temperature only, wants an end to the Kosovo ethnic-cleansing of Serbs and end to the USA provoked war in the Ukraine. What you mean is CNN tells you his stuff about water is wrong so you reckon that's
correct, same with climate change, except they didn't tell you about China not reaching peak CO2 levels until 2030 at the Paris agreement.

Yes, the jews and the bicycle riders! Why the riders? You say, why the jews I say!
-ship of fools! Thx Miss KAPorter

Did you see the film, gypes? '65 or so?

"Kaufmann...Kaufmann...

"Is that not a JEWISH name?"

The Doors also had a song "Ship of Fools".

Probably you know about both, but just in case...

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "...and your little dog, too!"
--Sawfish

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, June 12, 2023 at 2:17:51 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:

On Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 18:49:06 UTC+1, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:

Let's take the bad news first.

Off court, Djokovic is quite a foolish guy. Clearly
worse than your average joe. His off court stupidity
has even affected his tennis career, forcing him
to miss Grand Slam tournaments where he would
have had very good chances of winning. Unbelievable!

And what about the ignorant comments on how you
could alter the molecular structure of liquids
(was it water?) simply using the power of your
*thinking* alone?

Give me a break! That's just ridiculous! :-)

But on a tennis court, I suppose we must call him a
genius. Like in all sports, greatness in tennis is
measured according to your successes and losses. Yes,
many may admire the beauty of Federer's classic tennis
shots, but to me, it is ultimately *winning* that
matters.

I know that Brad Gilbert even wrote a book titled
"Winning Ugly". Tennis umpires will never give you
extra points for your elegant shots, you just
have to win the right points to earn the match
and that's it.

The Roland Garros 2023 men's final is over. Everybody
knows Djokovic's relevant statistics now. My claim
is that Novak Djokovic is the greatest tennis player
of all time. Even before this victory, I had the
same opinion and I certainly was not alone.

Rafa will of course forever remain as the King of Clay.
I am confident that his clay court achievements will
never be surpassed. Those results are almost
miraculous. Surely nobody else can win Roland Garros
14 times! Also think about Rafa's victories on the
ATP1000 Masters played on clay!

Back to Djoker. Novak Djokovic is 36 years old now
and he is still capable of beating everybody, and
he can still win Grand Slam titles. No need to take
my word it because Djoker himself just proved it in
Paris today. What a performance!

In all honesty, I would have preferred Ruud to win,
but I give my congratulations to Djokovic. He played
better tennis and deserved his victory.

You never know, but I am pretty sure that the
championship in French Open 2023 will not be Djoker's
last Grand Slam title. As long as he stays healthy,
he will be among the favourites to win in any
given tournament that he enters.

It really does not matter whether they play on clay,
hard courts, grass, carpet or whatever. This amazing
champion can handle absolutely all different
circumstances.

I don't care whether many centuries will pass,
but Novak Djokovic's greatness just cannot be
paralleled or exceeded.

br,
KK

this is totally wrong as off-court Djoker MUST 100% be the most sensible guy out there cos he beats everyone else when he gets on court. It's his off-court stuff that means he wins on-court + all the stuff he's said off-court has been very good, he

sensibly didn't get vaxed, drinks water at room temperature only, wants an end to the Kosovo ethnic-cleansing of Serbs and end to the USA provoked war in the Ukraine. What you mean is CNN tells you his stuff about water is wrong so you reckon that's
correct, same with climate change, except they didn't tell you about China not reaching peak CO2 levels until 2030 at the Paris agreement.

Very good point about his off-court rituals/habits paying off on-court.

Also, IMO, a truly scientific approach would be to test a theory before classifying it as BS.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, June 12, 2023 at 5:17:51 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:

On Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 18:49:06 UTC+1, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:

Let's take the bad news first.

Off court, Djokovic is quite a foolish guy. Clearly
worse than your average joe. His off court stupidity
has even affected his tennis career, forcing him
to miss Grand Slam tournaments where he would
have had very good chances of winning. Unbelievable!

And what about the ignorant comments on how you
could alter the molecular structure of liquids
(was it water?) simply using the power of your
*thinking* alone?

Give me a break! That's just ridiculous! :-)

But on a tennis court, I suppose we must call him a
genius. Like in all sports, greatness in tennis is
measured according to your successes and losses. Yes,
many may admire the beauty of Federer's classic tennis
shots, but to me, it is ultimately *winning* that
matters.

I know that Brad Gilbert even wrote a book titled
"Winning Ugly". Tennis umpires will never give you
extra points for your elegant shots, you just
have to win the right points to earn the match
and that's it.

The Roland Garros 2023 men's final is over. Everybody
knows Djokovic's relevant statistics now. My claim
is that Novak Djokovic is the greatest tennis player
of all time. Even before this victory, I had the
same opinion and I certainly was not alone.

Rafa will of course forever remain as the King of Clay.
I am confident that his clay court achievements will
never be surpassed. Those results are almost
miraculous. Surely nobody else can win Roland Garros
14 times! Also think about Rafa's victories on the
ATP1000 Masters played on clay!

Back to Djoker. Novak Djokovic is 36 years old now
and he is still capable of beating everybody, and
he can still win Grand Slam titles. No need to take
my word it because Djoker himself just proved it in
Paris today. What a performance!

In all honesty, I would have preferred Ruud to win,
but I give my congratulations to Djokovic. He played
better tennis and deserved his victory.

You never know, but I am pretty sure that the
championship in French Open 2023 will not be Djoker's
last Grand Slam title. As long as he stays healthy,
he will be among the favourites to win in any
given tournament that he enters.

It really does not matter whether they play on clay,
hard courts, grass, carpet or whatever. This amazing
champion can handle absolutely all different
circumstances.

I don't care whether many centuries will pass,
but Novak Djokovic's greatness just cannot be
paralleled or exceeded.

br,
KK

this is totally wrong as off-court Djoker MUST 100% be the most sensible guy out there cos he beats everyone else when he gets on court. It's his off-court stuff that means he wins on-court + all the stuff he's said off-court has been very good, he

sensibly didn't get vaxed, drinks water at room temperature only, wants an end to the Kosovo ethnic-cleansing of Serbs and end to the USA provoked war in the Ukraine. What you mean is CNN tells you his stuff about water is wrong so you reckon that's
correct, same with climate change, except they didn't tell you about China not reaching peak CO2 levels until 2030 at the Paris agreement.

Yes, the jews and the bicycle riders! Why the riders? You say, why the jews I say!
-ship of fools! Thx Miss KAPorter

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 12 June 2023 at 18:05:50 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:

On 6/12/23 9:50 AM, gap...@gmail.com wrote:

On Monday, June 12, 2023 at 5:17:51 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:

On Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 18:49:06 UTC+1, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:

Let's take the bad news first.

Off court, Djokovic is quite a foolish guy. Clearly
worse than your average joe. His off court stupidity
has even affected his tennis career, forcing him
to miss Grand Slam tournaments where he would
have had very good chances of winning. Unbelievable!

And what about the ignorant comments on how you
could alter the molecular structure of liquids
(was it water?) simply using the power of your
*thinking* alone?

Give me a break! That's just ridiculous! :-)


But on a tennis court, I suppose we must call him a
genius. Like in all sports, greatness in tennis is
measured according to your successes and losses. Yes,
many may admire the beauty of Federer's classic tennis
shots, but to me, it is ultimately *winning* that
matters.

I know that Brad Gilbert even wrote a book titled
"Winning Ugly". Tennis umpires will never give you
extra points for your elegant shots, you just
have to win the right points to earn the match
and that's it.

The Roland Garros 2023 men's final is over. Everybody
knows Djokovic's relevant statistics now. My claim
is that Novak Djokovic is the greatest tennis player
of all time. Even before this victory, I had the
same opinion and I certainly was not alone.

Rafa will of course forever remain as the King of Clay.
I am confident that his clay court achievements will
never be surpassed. Those results are almost
miraculous. Surely nobody else can win Roland Garros
14 times! Also think about Rafa's victories on the
ATP1000 Masters played on clay!

Back to Djoker. Novak Djokovic is 36 years old now
and he is still capable of beating everybody, and
he can still win Grand Slam titles. No need to take
my word it because Djoker himself just proved it in
Paris today. What a performance!

In all honesty, I would have preferred Ruud to win,
but I give my congratulations to Djokovic. He played
better tennis and deserved his victory.

You never know, but I am pretty sure that the
championship in French Open 2023 will not be Djoker's
last Grand Slam title. As long as he stays healthy,
he will be among the favourites to win in any
given tournament that he enters.

It really does not matter whether they play on clay,
hard courts, grass, carpet or whatever. This amazing
champion can handle absolutely all different
circumstances.

I don't care whether many centuries will pass,
but Novak Djokovic's greatness just cannot be
paralleled or exceeded.

br,
KK

this is totally wrong as off-court Djoker MUST 100% be the most sensible guy out there cos he beats everyone else when he gets on court. It's his off-court stuff that means he wins on-court + all the stuff he's said off-court has been very good, he

sensibly didn't get vaxed, drinks water at room temperature only, wants an end to the Kosovo ethnic-cleansing of Serbs and end to the USA provoked war in the Ukraine. What you mean is CNN tells you his stuff about water is wrong so you reckon that's
correct, same with climate change, except they didn't tell you about China not reaching peak CO2 levels until 2030 at the Paris agreement.

Yes, the jews and the bicycle riders! Why the riders? You say, why the jews I say!
-ship of fools! Thx Miss KAPorter

Did you see the film, gypes? '65 or so?

"Kaufmann...Kaufmann...

"Is that not a JEWISH name?"

The Doors also had a song "Ship of Fools".

Probably you know about both, but just in case...

HAAAHAHAHA gups is calling "ship of fools" after Djoker wins the FO and 23 slams and supporting BLM(buy us larger mansions), the fake vaxes, Trump Russia hoax, $BILLIONS being sent to unaccountable corrupt Ukraine, the climate "emergency" that was put on-
hold for 2 years etc LOL

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)