In article <5894f3c3$0$61788$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com>,
"Fritz Owl" <FritzOwl@hotmail.com> wrote:
[subject line restored]
"Sang Froid" <cold@blood.ed> wrote in message
news:W15lA.226473$dT1.212583@fx16.am4...
[hogwash snipped]
Those articles you keep quoting are all a bunch of psychobbble hogwash. I
consider pychology, as a college major, to be a waster of tuition money.
And still you refuse to tell us what, precisely, in that article is "hogwash". Why is that?
Chuckie is a "troll" and IS psycho.
Chuckie is certifably insane.
undesiable
In article <58955593$0$43832$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com>,
"Fritz Owl" <FritzOwl@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd2-E39067.18294303022017@news.giganews.com...
In article <5894f3c3$0$61788$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com>,
"Fritz Owl" <FritzOwl@hotmail.com> wrote:
[subject line restored]
"Sang Froid" <cold@blood.ed> wrote in message
news:W15lA.226473$dT1.212583@fx16.am4...
[hogwash snipped]
Those articles you keep quoting are all a bunch of psychobbble
hogwash. I
consider pychology, as a college major, to be a waster of tuition
money.
And still you refuse to tell us what, precisely, in that article is
"hogwash". Why is that?
So-called "trolls" are NOT psychos or anything else. If that were the
case,
a sizeable chunk of Internet users, including some Congressm Senators
would
be certifably insane, which they are NOT.
Why do you claim that "a sizeable chunk of Internet users" are trolls?
And what do you consider a "sizeable" chunk? 90%? 80%? 50%? 25%? 10%?
"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message news:hlwdjsd2-E39067.18294303022017@news.giganews.com...
In article <5894f3c3$0$61788$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com>,
"Fritz Owl" <FritzOwl@hotmail.com> wrote:
[subject line restored]
"Sang Froid" <cold@blood.ed> wrote in message
news:W15lA.226473$dT1.212583@fx16.am4...
[hogwash snipped]
Those articles you keep quoting are all a bunch of psychobbble hogwash. I >> consider pychology, as a college major, to be a waster of tuition money.
And still you refuse to tell us what, precisely, in that article is "hogwash". Why is that?
So-called "trolls" are NOT psychos or anything else. If that were the case,
a sizeable chunk of Internet users, including some Congressm Senators would be certifably insane, which they are NOT.
"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message news:hlwdjsd2-9FD73C.23321103022017@news.giganews.com...
In article <58955593$0$43832$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com>,
"Fritz Owl" <FritzOwl@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd2-E39067.18294303022017@news.giganews.com...
In article <5894f3c3$0$61788$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com>,
"Fritz Owl" <FritzOwl@hotmail.com> wrote:
[subject line restored]
"Sang Froid" <cold@blood.ed> wrote in message
news:W15lA.226473$dT1.212583@fx16.am4...
[hogwash snipped]
Those articles you keep quoting are all a bunch of psychobbble
hogwash. I
consider pychology, as a college major, to be a waster of tuition
money.
And still you refuse to tell us what, precisely, in that article is
"hogwash". Why is that?
So-called "trolls" are NOT psychos or anything else. If that were the
case,
a sizeable chunk of Internet users, including some Congressm Senators
would
be certifably insane, which they are NOT.
Why do you claim that "a sizeable chunk of Internet users" are trolls?
And what do you consider a "sizeable" chunk? 90%? 80%? 50%? 25%? 10%?
Chuckie is a "trolls" and *IS* PSYCHO!!!!
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 285 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 72:22:07 |
Calls: | 6,489 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,096 |
Messages: | 5,275,731 |