This TCU team slots somewhere between Mississippi State(not as
good as them) and auburn(better than them, at least this year)......
this was *never* going to be a game. Georgia is out there just laughing.....like this is a freaking scrimmage or something.
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:03:49 PM UTC-8, miande...@gmail.com wrote:
This TCU team slots somewhere between Mississippi State(not as
good as them) and auburn(better than them, at least this year)......
this was *never* going to be a game. Georgia is out there just laughing.....like this is a freaking scrimmage or something.
Because it basically was. Someone has to explain the Ohio State semifinal.
Because, otherwise, this team WAS 14 better than anybody.
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 20:35:21 -0800 (PST), Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:03:49 PM UTC-8, miande...@gmail.com wrote: >> This TCU team slots somewhere between Mississippi State(not as
good as them) and auburn(better than them, at least this year)......
this was *never* going to be a game. Georgia is out there just laughing.....like this is a freaking scrimmage or something.
Because it basically was. Someone has to explain the Ohio State semifinal.
Because, otherwise, this team WAS 14 better than anybody.My opinion on that game is GA was full of themselves and took Ohio Sate too lightly. All season long the players said they had
better talent than the other team, and OSU had just come off a 22 point loss. Couple that attitude with the OSU quarterback having
a carreer day, plus GA gfting a TD to OSU, and GA digs a big hole. In the 4th quarter Bennett told the team it wasn't too late and it was time to get
the job done. And, in the 4th quarter, GA got 200 of their offense yards and 18 pts, while OSU got about 80 yards and 3 pts. When GA got motivated in
the 4th quarter, they played like GA. Almost wasn't enough, OSU did get a FG pot shot, but GA did keep him out of his reliable range.
OSU had a very good team, but if that game were replayed, I think it would be another 20+ loss.
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 9:37:38 AM UTC-5, j...@mich.com wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 20:35:21 -0800 (PST), Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:03:49 PM UTC-8, miande...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> This TCU team slots somewhere between Mississippi State(not asMy opinion on that game is GA was full of themselves and took Ohio Sate too lightly. All season long the players said they had
good as them) and auburn(better than them, at least this year)......
this was *never* going to be a game. Georgia is out there just laughing.....like this is a freaking scrimmage or something.
Because it basically was. Someone has to explain the Ohio State semifinal. >> >
Because, otherwise, this team WAS 14 better than anybody.
better talent than the other team, and OSU had just come off a 22 point loss. Couple that attitude with the OSU quarterback having
a carreer day, plus GA gfting a TD to OSU, and GA digs a big hole. In the 4th quarter Bennett told the team it wasn't too late and it was time to get
the job done. And, in the 4th quarter, GA got 200 of their offense yards and 18 pts, while OSU got about 80 yards and 3 pts. When GA got motivated in
the 4th quarter, they played like GA. Almost wasn't enough, OSU did get a FG pot shot, but GA did keep him out of his reliable range.
OSU had a very good team, but if that game were replayed, I think it would be another 20+ loss.
Georgia won because the Refs did not throw a flag on their blatant targeting >penalty on an Ohio State player in the in zone. Had Georgia been given the penalty
they deserved - game over - Buckeyes win.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 21:54:16 -0800 (PST), Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 9:37:38 AM UTC-5, j...@mich.com wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 20:35:21 -0800 (PST), Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:03:49 PM UTC-8, miande...@gmail.com wrote:My opinion on that game is GA was full of themselves and took Ohio Sate too lightly. All season long the players said they had
This TCU team slots somewhere between Mississippi State(not as
good as them) and auburn(better than them, at least this year)......
this was *never* going to be a game. Georgia is out there just laughing.....like this is a freaking scrimmage or something.
Because it basically was. Someone has to explain the Ohio State semifinal.
Because, otherwise, this team WAS 14 better than anybody.
better talent than the other team, and OSU had just come off a 22 point loss. Couple that attitude with the OSU quarterback having
a carreer day, plus GA gfting a TD to OSU, and GA digs a big hole. In the 4th quarter Bennett told the team it wasn't too late and it was time to get
the job done. And, in the 4th quarter, GA got 200 of their offense yards and 18 pts, while OSU got about 80 yards and 3 pts. When GA got motivated in
the 4th quarter, they played like GA. Almost wasn't enough, OSU did get a FG pot shot, but GA did keep him out of his reliable range.
OSU had a very good team, but if that game were replayed, I think it would be another 20+ loss.
Georgia won because the Refs did not throw a flag on their blatant targeting >penalty on an Ohio State player in the in zone. Had Georgia been given the penalty
they deserved - game over - Buckeyes win.
So you're saying Ohio State couldn't win on the field by earning a first down
Georgia won because the Refs did not throw a flag on their blatant targeting penalty on an Ohio State player in the in zone. Had Georgia been given the penalty
they deserved - game over - Buckeyes win.
Georgia won because the Refs did not throw a flag on their blatant targetingAnybody got a vid on that one?
penalty on an Ohio State player in the in zone. Had Georgia been given the penalty
they deserved - game over - Buckeyes win.
Here you go:Georgia won because the Refs did not throw a flag on their blatant targetingAnybody got a vid on that one?
penalty on an Ohio State player in the in zone. Had Georgia been given the penalty
they deserved - game over - Buckeyes win.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWcXolN0W_w
Here you go:Georgia won because the Refs did not throw a flag on their blatant targetingAnybody got a vid on that one?
penalty on an Ohio State player in the in zone. Had Georgia been given the penalty
they deserved - game over - Buckeyes win.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWcXolN0W_w
Thank you. If the targeting penalty had been called, OSU is
first and goal. Buckeyes win. Period. And how any one
could look at that helment to helment contact and not
call targeting is just unbelievable. Especially when the
OSU player was out for the rest of the game with a concussion.
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 6:51:20 PM UTC-5, The NOTBCS Guy wrote:
Here you go:Georgia won because the Refs did not throw a flag on their blatant targetingAnybody got a vid on that one?
penalty on an Ohio State player in the in zone. Had Georgia been given the penalty
they deserved - game over - Buckeyes win.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWcXolN0W_w
Thank you. If the targeting penalty had been called, OSU is
first and goal. Buckeyes win. Period. And how any one
could look at that helment to helment contact and not
call targeting is just unbelievable. Especially when the
OSU player was out for the rest of the game with a concussion.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:30:57 -0800 (PST), Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 6:51:20 PM UTC-5, The NOTBCS Guy wrote:
Here you go:Georgia won because the Refs did not throw a flag on their blatant targetingAnybody got a vid on that one?
penalty on an Ohio State player in the in zone. Had Georgia been given the penalty
they deserved - game over - Buckeyes win.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWcXolN0W_w
Thank you. If the targeting penalty had been called, OSU is
first and goal. Buckeyes win. Period. And how any one
could look at that helment to helment contact and not
call targeting is just unbelievable. Especially when the
OSU player was out for the rest of the game with a concussion.
Targeting is quite subjective. The rule is defined as leading with the helmet to make forcible contact.
On Tuesday, January 17, 2023 at 7:29:58 AM UTC-8, j...@mich.com wrote:Spearing.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:30:57 -0800 (PST), Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 6:51:20 PM UTC-5, The NOTBCS Guy wrote:Targeting is quite subjective. The rule is defined as leading with the helmet to make forcible contact.
Here you go:Georgia won because the Refs did not throw a flag on their blatant targetingAnybody got a vid on that one?
penalty on an Ohio State player in the in zone. Had Georgia been given the penalty
they deserved - game over - Buckeyes win.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWcXolN0W_w
Thank you. If the targeting penalty had been called, OSU is
first and goal. Buckeyes win. Period. And how any one
could look at that helment to helment contact and not
call targeting is just unbelievable. Especially when the
OSU player was out for the rest of the game with a concussion.
Actually, it's any forcible above the shoulder contact which is deemed non-incidental. The helmet is not necessary. Leading with the helmet to make forcible contact is another thing entirely, and maybe it'd be better if the old term were used:
Spearing.Actually, it's any forcible above the shoulder contact which is deemed non-incidental. The helmet is not necessary. Leading with the helmet to make forcible contact is another thing entirely, and maybe it'd be better if the old term were used:
Yes. From the rule book -
ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of his helmet. This foul requires that there be at
least one indicator of targeting
ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist,
elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting.
Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal
tackle or a legal block or playing the ball.
An NCAA offical said many fans are confused about hard hits and helmet to helmet contact. If a player leads with his shoulder and hits the oppponent
in the shoulder or chest, and their helmets collide hard, that is not targeting.
Marvin Harrison himself called it “just a regular hit” and tried to go back in the game.
The receiver had stepped out of bounds and came back in and was the first player to touch the ball. Should have been immediately flagged. Had he
caught the ball it would have been a ruled touchdown. The targeting call drew attention elsewhere, and had that call not been overturned, the
touchdown would have stood since it wasn't flagged at the time, play is over, that penalty is not reviewable, and OSU would have won the game on
another drive assisted by a non-call. Since targeting was overturned, OSU should have been penalized 5 yards and loss of down.
Another thing you have to note, from the rule book, is that the replay official cannot say, "The video is Inconclusive, so the call on the field stands"; if there is no evidence of an indicator of targeting, the targeting call must be overturned. I amunder the impression that the on-field officials are told, "When in doubt, call targeting," and the replay officials are told, "When in doubt, it is not targeting."
My opinion on that game is GA was full of themselves and took Ohio Sate too lightly. All season long the players said they had
better talent than the other team, and OSU had just come off a 22 point loss. Couple that attitude with the OSU quarterback having
a carreer day, plus GA gfting a TD to OSU, and GA digs a big hole. In the 4th quarter Bennett told the team it wasn't too late and it was time to get
the job done. And, in the 4th quarter, GA got 200 of their offense yards and 18 pts, while OSU got about 80 yards and 3 pts. When GA got motivated in
the 4th quarter, they played like GA. Almost wasn't enough, OSU did get a FG pot shot, but GA did keep him out of his reliable range.
OSU had a very good team, but if that game were replayed, I think it would be another 20+ loss.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 388 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 08:36:52 |
| Calls: | 8,221 |
| Files: | 13,122 |
| Messages: | 5,872,548 |