This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
On 11/16/2022 4:33 PM, GrtArtiste wrote:
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can
agree or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
I'll extend that to Joe Biden.
On 11/16/2022 4:33 PM, GrtArtiste wrote:I'll extend that to Joe &! Kamala.
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can
agree or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
I'll extend that to Joe Biden.
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
On 11/16/2022 5:00 PM, Ken Olson wrote:
On 11/16/2022 4:33 PM, GrtArtiste wrote:
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can
agree or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
I'll extend that to Joe Biden.
On 11/16/2022 5:00 PM, Ken Olson wrote:
On 11/16/2022 4:33 PM, GrtArtiste wrote:
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can
agree or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
I'll extend that to Joe Biden.I'll extend that to Joe &! Kamala.
GrtArtiste
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote:
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of a president undermined him from beginning to end."
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
On 2022-11-17, JGibson <james.m.gibson@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote:
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
Yes.
Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <cons...@duxmail.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-17, JGibson <james.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote: >>> This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree >>> or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
Yes.What’s likely to be effective in stopping him is the fact that he’s now lost them 3 elections in a row, not any principles or real objections to
his wannabe strongman clownery.
https://nbatitlechase.com/2022/01/23/photo-get-in-loser-were-going-losing-donald-trump-meme/
--
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, liberal personality.” — Altie
What’s likely to be effective in stopping him is the fact that he’s now lost them 3 elections in a row, not any principles or real objections to
his wannabe strongman clownery.
https://nbatitlechase.com/2022/01/23/photo-get-in-loser-were-going-losing-donald-trump-meme/
Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-17, JGibson <james.m.gibson@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote:
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree >>>> or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
Yes.
What’s likely to be effective in stopping him is the fact that he’s now lost them 3 elections in a row, not any principles or real objections to
his wannabe strongman clownery.
https://nbatitlechase.com/2022/01/23/photo-get-in-loser-were-going-losing-donald-trump-meme/
On 2022-11-17, xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com> wrote:
Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-17, JGibson <james.m.gibson@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote: >>>>> This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree >>>>> or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
Yes.
What’s likely to be effective in stopping him is the fact that he’s now >> lost them 3 elections in a row, not any principles or real objections to
his wannabe strongman clownery.
https://nbatitlechase.com/2022/01/23/photo-get-in-loser-were-going-losing-donald-trump-meme/
Of course. His advantage was his fanbois belief in his "strength", and
when you lose you look weak.
I gotta think that his announcing early is going to make him weaker
yet, because it's clear that he will struggle to get exposure. As he
starts feeling ignored, he'll do things which make him look truly
desperate. That isn't a good look. DeSantis should keep waiting; the
Donald risks implosion month by month. If his rallies stop pulling in
crowds, he's done.
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
By all means let's elect someone that says the right things but doesn't get shit done for the country. If it had been left up to our current population we would've lost WWII and all be boot licking Germans.
Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-17, xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com> wrote:
Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-17, JGibson <james.m.gibson@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote: >>>>>> This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree >>>>>> or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
Yes.
What’s likely to be effective in stopping him is the fact that he’s now >>> lost them 3 elections in a row, not any principles or real objections to >>> his wannabe strongman clownery.
https://nbatitlechase.com/2022/01/23/photo-get-in-loser-were-going-losing-donald-trump-meme/
Of course. His advantage was his fanbois belief in his "strength", and
when you lose you look weak.
I gotta think that his announcing early is going to make him weaker
yet, because it's clear that he will struggle to get exposure. As he
starts feeling ignored, he'll do things which make him look truly
desperate. That isn't a good look. DeSantis should keep waiting; the
Donald risks implosion month by month. If his rallies stop pulling in
crowds, he's done.
Almost every past presidential primary teaches us that the last thing DeSantis (or anyone) wants to do is peak too early.
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 3:33:39 PM UTC-6, GrtArtiste wrote:
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
By all means let's elect someone that says the right things but doesn't get shit done for the country. If it had been left up to our current population we would've lost WWII and all be boot licking Germans.
'To his credit, Trump killed off the Clinton dynasty in 2016,
nominated and got confirmed three constitutionalist justices, reformed
taxes, pushed deregulation, got control of the border, significantly
degraded ISIS in Syria and Iraq, and cinched normalization deals
between Israel and the Gulf states, among other things. These are achievements that even his conservative doubters and critics —
including NR — can acknowledge and applaud.'
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of
a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a strongman.
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkstar7646@gmail.com> posted some news:9f075c02-860e-4caa-9a68-449c0dbb340cn@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of
a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a
strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years.
Put them down and end this stupidity.
<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg>
Heil Hitler!
Spoken like a true Nazi.
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> posted some news:9f075c02-860e-4caa...@googlegroups.com:
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years.
Put them down and end this stupidity.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 02:03:30 -0500, RoddyMcCorley <Roddy.McCorley@verizon.net> wrote:
On 11/19/2022 11:50 PM, Workday wrote:
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkstar7646@gmail.com> posted someHeil Hitler!
news:9f075c02-860e-4caa-9a68-449c0dbb340cn@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of >>>>> a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a
strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy >>> types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and
females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years. >>> Put them down and end this stupidity.
<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg> >>
Spoken like a true Nazi.
Heil wokery!
Spoken like a true degenerate.
Heil wokery!
Spoken like a true degenerate.
On 11/19/2022 11:50 PM, Workday wrote:
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkstar7646@gmail.com> posted some
news:9f075c02-860e-4caa-9a68-449c0dbb340cn@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of
a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a
strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy
types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and
females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years.
Put them down and end this stupidity.
<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg>
Heil Hitler!
Spoken like a true Nazi.
Ed Rhodes wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 02:03:30 -0500, RoddyMcCorleyyou're not even ed rhodes
<Roddy.McCorley@verizon.net> wrote:
On 11/19/2022 11:50 PM, Workday wrote:
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkstar7646@gmail.com> posted someHeil Hitler!
news:9f075c02-860e-4caa-9a68-449c0dbb340cn@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of >>>>>> a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a >>>>> strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy >>>> types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and >>>> females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years. >>>> Put them down and end this stupidity.
<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg> >>>
Spoken like a true Nazi.
Heil wokery!
Spoken like a true degenerate.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 02:03:30 -0500, RoddyMcCorley
<Roddy.M...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 11/19/2022 11:50 PM, Workday wrote:
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> posted some
news:9f075c02-860e-4caa...@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of >>>> a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a
strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy >> types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and
females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years. >> Put them down and end this stupidity.
<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg>
Heil Hitler!
Spoken like a true Nazi.Heil wokery!
Spoken like a true degenerate.
On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 5:25:14 PM UTC-6, Ed Rhodes wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 02:03:30 -0500, RoddyMcCorley
<Roddy.M...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 11/19/2022 11:50 PM, Workday wrote:
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> posted some
news:9f075c02-860e-4caa...@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of >>>> a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a >>> strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy
types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and >> females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years.
Put them down and end this stupidity.
<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg>
Heil Hitler!
Spoken like a true Nazi.Heil wokery!
Spoken like a true degenerate.
Woke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nazi
HTH
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote:
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 8:02:34 PM UTC-5, JGibson wrote:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote:
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
GrtArtiste
Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
National Review is establishment GOP, the party of Washington DC. not of the rank and file.
I read NR for decades, almost everything they wrote, dead tree and digital, until about a decade
ago, I can't recall the last time I've read any of their stuff.
Trump isn't conservative or establishment or DC. The NR would rather have Clinton, either one,
than Trump. Status quo buys the scotch and pays for Georgetown thinktanks.
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:20:40 PM UTC-6, TE wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:43:45 AM UTC-5, Some dued wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 5:25:14 PM UTC-6, Ed Rhodes wrote:I guess that depends on where you are standing. Gay? Correct. Saxon? Nope. Catholic? It's a push.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 02:03:30 -0500, RoddyMcCorley
<Roddy.M...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 11/19/2022 11:50 PM, Workday wrote:Heil wokery!
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> posted some
news:9f075c02-860e-4caa...@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder, >>>>>>> unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of >>>>>>>> a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a >>>>>>> strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy
types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and >>>>>> females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should >>>>>> simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool. >>>>>>
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years.
Put them down and end this stupidity.
<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg>
Heil Hitler!
Spoken like a true Nazi.
Spoken like a true degenerate.
Woke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nazi
HTH
-TE
Those woke concentration camps are brutal.
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:43:45 AM UTC-5, Some dued wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 5:25:14 PM UTC-6, Ed Rhodes wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 02:03:30 -0500, RoddyMcCorley <Roddy.M...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 11/19/2022 11:50 PM, Workday wrote:
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> posted some
news:9f075c02-860e-4caa...@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of >>>> a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a >>> strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy
types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and >> females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should >> simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool. >>
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years.
Put them down and end this stupidity.
<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg>
Heil Hitler!
Spoken like a true Nazi.Heil wokery!
Spoken like a true degenerate.
Woke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NaziI guess that depends on where you are standing. Gay? Correct. Saxon? Nope. Catholic? It's a push.
HTH
-TE
Those woke concentration camps are brutal.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/National Review is establishment GOP, the party of Washington DC. not of the rank and file.
I read NR for decades, almost everything they wrote, dead tree and digital, until about a decade
ago, I can't recall the last time I've read any of their stuff.
Trump isn't conservative or establishment or DC. The NR would rather have Clinton, either one,
than Trump. Status quo buys the scotch and pays for Georgetown thinktanks.
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 7:20:40 PM UTC-6, TE wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:43:45 AM UTC-5, Some dued wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 5:25:14 PM UTC-6, Ed Rhodes wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 02:03:30 -0500, RoddyMcCorley <Roddy.M...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 11/19/2022 11:50 PM, Workday wrote:
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> posted some >> news:9f075c02-860e-4caa...@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder, >>> unhyphenated American wrote:
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of
a president undermined him from beginning to end."
Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a
strongman.
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy
types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and
females?
Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.
The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years.
Put them down and end this stupidity.
<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg>
Heil Hitler!
Spoken like a true Nazi.Heil wokery!
Spoken like a true degenerate.
Woke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nazi HTHI guess that depends on where you are standing. Gay? Correct. Saxon? Nope. Catholic? It's a push.
-TE
Those woke concentration camps are brutal.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 388 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 08:13:39 |
| Calls: | 8,221 |
| Files: | 13,122 |
| Messages: | 5,872,537 |
