• And if you need to understand why most college football is irrelevant o

    From Michael Falkner@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 15 14:02:19 2022
    Three weeks ago:

    Kansas State 41
    Oklahoma 34

    at home.

    Two weeks ago:

    TCU 55
    Oklahoma 24

    at TCU.

    Last week, Red River Shootout Neutral Site:

    Texas 49
    Oklahoma 0

    This week:

    #19 Kansas 42
    Oklahoma 52

    Why are we bothering with an antiquated model at this point?

    Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From xyzzy@21:1/5 to Michael Falkner on Sun Oct 16 13:27:57 2022
    Michael Falkner <darkstar7646@gmail.com> wrote:
    Three weeks ago:

    Kansas State 41
    Oklahoma 34

    at home.

    Two weeks ago:

    TCU 55
    Oklahoma 24

    at TCU.

    Last week, Red River Shootout Neutral Site:

    Texas 49
    Oklahoma 0

    This week:

    #19 Kansas 42
    Oklahoma 52

    Why are we bothering with an antiquated model at this point?

    Mike


    My CFPOOL this week is going to be ugly.

    That is all

    --
    “I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, liberal personality.” — Altie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The NOTBCS Guy@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 19 11:37:26 2022
    Why are we bothering with an antiquated model at this point?

    Because every now and then, that "antiquated model" works, and pretty much any other model would have ended up with arguments over who the national champion should be.

    Can you think of a better one?
    Clarification: "Better," as in, "not this '32 teams, each one owned, or at least controlled, by an NFL team, and draft players into them straight out of high school' nonsense again."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Falkner@21:1/5 to The NOTBCS Guy on Wed Oct 19 12:11:22 2022
    On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 11:37:28 AM UTC-7, The NOTBCS Guy wrote:
    Why are we bothering with an antiquated model at this point?
    Because every now and then, that "antiquated model" works, and pretty much any other model would have ended up with arguments over who the national champion should be.

    Can you think of a better one?
    Clarification: "Better," as in, "not this '32 teams, each one owned, or at least controlled, by an NFL team, and draft players into them straight out of high school' nonsense again."

    No, that IS the better scenario.

    3/4 or more of the current teams, even in the Power 5, are wasting their time and money (and probably the physical health of the players).

    Especially given the nature of football, not only is big-time college football bad business (and losing money for many schools, even and especially as it props up the rest of college sports -- which is an even bigger money-loser!), it is life-threatening
    to many of the players, many of whom probably would have no business in FCS or the like if there were enough players of any quality left to justify the current model.

    And the fact that many of these players lack the quality, etc. is now bleeding into the NFL itself!

    Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)