• Are women a better NIL investment?

    From xyzzy@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 14 18:49:44 2022
    https://twitter.com/melidavies/status/1580547223086985216?s=46&t=gdybu337qdXGP3ZoyqF_rw

    --
    “I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, liberal personality.” — Altie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TE@21:1/5 to xyzzy on Fri Oct 14 13:27:39 2022
    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 2:49:48 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
    https://twitter.com/melidavies/status/1580547223086985216?s=46&t=gdybu337qdXGP3ZoyqF_rw

    My guess is that the term "engagement" as it is used here, has a different definition than most people use.
    Or perhaps female athletes are more likely to interact on social media with fans. If you take this at face
    value, obviously structural sexism endemic in universities prevent male athletes from "engaging." Clearly
    a Title IX violation.

    -TE

    Title IX campus officials are often highly-paid people with exceptional power. Harvard boasts more than
    50 Title IX coordinators, more than 80 percent of them women. These careers depend on a steady
    stream of complaints. Too many people have too much invested in making campus sexual politics a
    problem that can’t be solved.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)