I simultaneously can, and then cannot, believe I actually have to post this.

But, after Irish Mike's poker analogy, I'm not sure I'm going to be able to get the point across to the treasonous shithead if I don't explicitly tell him why he's in far deeper doo-doo than he thinks he is, and so is basically any Republican who chooses
to support Trump and Q.

(By the way, Mr. Former President, nice pin on that lapel. Yeah, The Storm is coming. You best hope you're in control of it when it gets here!)

First off, if we were actually playing poker, Irish Mike would long since have been “on the clock”. (For those who do not watch poker tournaments, when it is a player's turn and it is believed an excessive period of time is being taken, a tournament
director or similar authority can be brought over and a small further time period given before the player's hand is dead (folded).)

I think this is one of the main reasons I'm angry at him and at the MAGA/Republican crowd here. And there are numerous reasons why – of which this is hardly an exhaustive list...

* If it is correct as the Republicans believe that the stimuli and similar welfare expansions have either caused or contributed to the current inflation, would it not then be required to eliminate all of that and everyone and every business reliant on
same? Would that not make even the remotest concept of sense here? If you want prices back under control by contracting the money supply, then you must also eliminate the “useless eaters” and all of the other undesirables you have such a hard-on on
at least SAYING you need dead.

* If you believe that crime is so rampant in the cities, then why are you not doing two things, as military exercises?

First, taking over the cities from the inside out... Let me give you a little secret from my nine years on the streets – there is ZE and RO deterrent for a lot of these homeless people to gut the downtowns they are terrorizing. Jail, even prison, is
an IMPROVEMENT for many of them. And there's zero chance of employability.

Second, at some point before they DO come after you in the rural areas (and, trust me, they're more than expanding into the exurbs as we speak!), why are you not violently seizing power in cities like Baltimore, Chicago, Philadelphia, Seattle, Portland,
Oakland/San Francisco, LA all the way to the exurbs, etc. and so forth? And this can extend to states run by those cities like Illinois, California, Oregon, and Washington, etc... The problem you have with letting those cities die is you lose the
infrastructure, which will mean transport of goods will become far more difficult, if not impossible, once the cities are completely lost.

* A question I asked before of the Republican contingent here on RSFC, and I'm not exactly 100% sure anyone gave me a straight answer: Do you believe that Joe Biden is the legally-elected 46th President of the United States of America?

If that answer is, in any way, no: You have two major problems.

First, how does that not constitute “tyrannical government” on how you were taught that you had the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment? (And, if Ken Olson is correct that you fear arrest, then... guess what? YOU DON'T HAVE THAT RIGHT!!!!
) Restated: Have we not long passed the point when the militias and Oathkeepers should get their guns out of their anuses, put their clothes on, get a nutsack, and shoot the rest of us?

Second, how can another election feasibly be held – this Fall or at any feasible point in the future? I mean, I'm the first to understand that's the POINT of this (to end elections as they've been held), but the fact is, you aren't in power yet and
you still, if you continue to be inconsistent cowards about it all, need to rise back to sufficient power through... the very same elections you continue to slam as hopelessly corrupt!

* Dovetailing, since we are now apparent that not only does a significant amount of the populace, but Mr. Trump himself, believe he is still President of the United States in exile at Mar-a-Lago, at what point does the American Right realize that either
he is giving material aid and comfort to the enemies of our nation as an instrument of war (Saudi Arabia/Russia and others, with at least respect to the Ukraine conflict!), or the entire leftward portion of the country is doing same on a far more
domestic front (from the George Floyd riots forward, it is clear to anyone with open eyes that the Second American Civil War is now about 2 ½ years in progress!)?

* With the appropriate penalties (lethal) to the losing side, under the Constitution of the United States of America? (Though the Constitution does not proscribe the penalty for treason, that is the only crime which is defined therein.)

* Now, COVID: Since you have pretty much won the day in making sure this country is never adequately protected against COVID and that we never reach herd immunity, you are left with only a very few options:

1) You cannot feasibly avoid COVID, meaning that there's a good chance that each wave of this will wipe at least 1-1.5% of everyone who gets it – and probably far higher, since we have deliberately understated the death toll to this disease by a
significant multiplicative factor (I'm going about five here.)

2) Your misguided “science” (and it's funny you mention that, both in the fact that you have no desire to see people educated (or educated people!) and a “culture war” we'll get into later) is correct, and then you have about 60% of the
population of this country carrying not only a lethal clot virus, but also carrying a contagious disease with which we can kill you. You really wanna play with THOSE odds?

* Speaking of the “culture wars”, one final thing on this list: If you believe transgenderism (and the L's, B's, G's, Q's, non-binaries, etc.) are that abhorrent, then why aren't you making good on what many of them believe you want to do?

I'll expand on that last one to a more general comment: You talk about those of us on this side as we can't tell the difference between man and woman. I could easily counter by saying that your side doesn't even know human beings, one from the other.
You are trying to take us back “as the Fathers intended”, to a world in which the Dred Scott Decision actually referenced: Blacks are farm equipment, women are breeding stock, and everyone else is useless, savages, or just plain need to be
eliminated from the equation as an instrument of God and of White Male Landowners' Manifest Destiny.

In short, to use the poker analogy: We don't even agree on what three cards were flopped when I went All In! You think you've got a full house, aces over whatever, not realizing there's no third ace in the flop, nor a standing pair, and you've got
garbage, while I'm waiting for flush and straight draws, etc.

You don't want us showing up at the polls in eight weeks, kids. Because I do believe you will be defeated at least for the Senate. (You had such a lead for the House until Dobbs screwed a lot of things for you guys.)

But, in short, if your side wins out, I'm dead. And I already know that to be the case. And, unlike your side, many on mine aren't as cowardly as you think we are. And that's just the general shit. We haven't even got to the specifics with respect to
“assumed depravity”, etc., which increase the stakes for a lot of you even higher with me specifically.

(Because not only should the New York Police Department have splattered my brains all over the wall outside the Palace Theatre that night, but the fact is that if your side wins, I will go violent and show you that assumed depravity -- just not at the
target you think I will.)

All In, and you ARE on the clock, Republicans.

Some people make terrorist threats. Some people understand that we are terrorist threats and need not make them.

Mike

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 1:26:32 AM UTC-5, Michael Falkner wrote:

I simultaneously can, and then cannot, believe I actually have to post this.

But, after Irish Mike's poker analogy, I'm not sure I'm going to be able to get the point across to the treasonous shithead if I don't explicitly tell him why he's in far deeper doo-doo than he thinks he is, and so is basically any Republican who

chooses to support Trump and Q.

(By the way, Mr. Former President, nice pin on that lapel. Yeah, The Storm is coming. You best hope you're in control of it when it gets here!)

First off, if we were actually playing poker, Irish Mike would long since have been “on the clock”. (For those who do not watch poker tournaments, when it is a player's turn and it is believed an excessive period of time is being taken, a

tournament director or similar authority can be brought over and a small further time period given before the player's hand is dead (folded).)

I think this is one of the main reasons I'm angry at him and at the MAGA/Republican crowd here. And there are numerous reasons why – of which this is hardly an exhaustive list...

* If it is correct as the Republicans believe that the stimuli and similar welfare expansions have either caused or contributed to the current inflation, would it not then be required to eliminate all of that and everyone and every business reliant on

same? Would that not make even the remotest concept of sense here? If you want prices back under control by contracting the money supply, then you must also eliminate the “useless eaters” and all of the other undesirables you have such a hard-on on
at least SAYING you need dead.

* If you believe that crime is so rampant in the cities, then why are you not doing two things, as military exercises?

First, taking over the cities from the inside out... Let me give you a little secret from my nine years on the streets – there is ZE and RO deterrent for a lot of these homeless people to gut the downtowns they are terrorizing. Jail, even prison, is

an IMPROVEMENT for many of them. And there's zero chance of employability.

Second, at some point before they DO come after you in the rural areas (and, trust me, they're more than expanding into the exurbs as we speak!), why are you not violently seizing power in cities like Baltimore, Chicago, Philadelphia, Seattle, Portland,

Oakland/San Francisco, LA all the way to the exurbs, etc. and so forth? And this can extend to states run by those cities like Illinois, California, Oregon, and Washington, etc... The problem you have with letting those cities die is you lose the
infrastructure, which will mean transport of goods will become far more difficult, if not impossible, once the cities are completely lost.

* A question I asked before of the Republican contingent here on RSFC, and I'm not exactly 100% sure anyone gave me a straight answer: Do you believe that Joe Biden is the legally-elected 46th President of the United States of America?

If that answer is, in any way, no: You have two major problems.

First, how does that not constitute “tyrannical government” on how you were taught that you had the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment? (And, if Ken Olson is correct that you fear arrest, then... guess what? YOU DON'T HAVE THAT RIGHT!!!!)

Restated: Have we not long passed the point when the militias and Oathkeepers should get their guns out of their anuses, put their clothes on, get a nutsack, and shoot the rest of us?

Second, how can another election feasibly be held – this Fall or at any feasible point in the future? I mean, I'm the first to understand that's the POINT of this (to end elections as they've been held), but the fact is, you aren't in power yet and

you still, if you continue to be inconsistent cowards about it all, need to rise back to sufficient power through... the very same elections you continue to slam as hopelessly corrupt!

* Dovetailing, since we are now apparent that not only does a significant amount of the populace, but Mr. Trump himself, believe he is still President of the United States in exile at Mar-a-Lago, at what point does the American Right realize that

either he is giving material aid and comfort to the enemies of our nation as an instrument of war (Saudi Arabia/Russia and others, with at least respect to the Ukraine conflict!), or the entire leftward portion of the country is doing same on a far more
domestic front (from the George Floyd riots forward, it is clear to anyone with open eyes that the Second American Civil War is now about 2 ½ years in progress!)?

* With the appropriate penalties (lethal) to the losing side, under the Constitution of the United States of America? (Though the Constitution does not proscribe the penalty for treason, that is the only crime which is defined therein.)

* Now, COVID: Since you have pretty much won the day in making sure this country is never adequately protected against COVID and that we never reach herd immunity, you are left with only a very few options:

1) You cannot feasibly avoid COVID, meaning that there's a good chance that each wave of this will wipe at least 1-1.5% of everyone who gets it – and probably far higher, since we have deliberately understated the death toll to this disease by a

significant multiplicative factor (I'm going about five here.)

2) Your misguided “science” (and it's funny you mention that, both in the fact that you have no desire to see people educated (or educated people!) and a “culture war” we'll get into later) is correct, and then you have about 60% of the

population of this country carrying not only a lethal clot virus, but also carrying a contagious disease with which we can kill you. You really wanna play with THOSE odds?

* Speaking of the “culture wars”, one final thing on this list: If you believe transgenderism (and the L's, B's, G's, Q's, non-binaries, etc.) are that abhorrent, then why aren't you making good on what many of them believe you want to do?

I'll expand on that last one to a more general comment: You talk about those of us on this side as we can't tell the difference between man and woman. I could easily counter by saying that your side doesn't even know human beings, one from the other.

You are trying to take us back “as the Fathers intended”, to a world in which the Dred Scott Decision actually referenced: Blacks are farm equipment, women are breeding stock, and everyone else is useless, savages, or just plain need to be eliminated
from the equation as an instrument of God and of White Male Landowners' Manifest Destiny.

In short, to use the poker analogy: We don't even agree on what three cards were flopped when I went All In! You think you've got a full house, aces over whatever, not realizing there's no third ace in the flop, nor a standing pair, and you've got

garbage, while I'm waiting for flush and straight draws, etc.

You don't want us showing up at the polls in eight weeks, kids. Because I do believe you will be defeated at least for the Senate. (You had such a lead for the House until Dobbs screwed a lot of things for you guys.)

But, in short, if your side wins out, I'm dead. And I already know that to be the case. And, unlike your side, many on mine aren't as cowardly as you think we are. And that's just the general shit. We haven't even got to the specifics with respect to �

�assumed depravity”, etc., which increase the stakes for a lot of you even higher with me specifically.

(Because not only should the New York Police Department have splattered my brains all over the wall outside the Palace Theatre that night, but the fact is that if your side wins, I will go violent and show you that assumed depravity -- just not at the

target you think I will.)

All In, and you ARE on the clock, Republicans.

Some people make terrorist threats. Some people understand that we are terrorist threats and need not make them.

Mike

TL; DR.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 9:40:51 AM UTC-4, unclejr wrote:

On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 1:26:32 AM UTC-5, Michael Falkner wrote:

I simultaneously can, and then cannot, believe I actually have to post this.

But, after Irish Mike's poker analogy, I'm not sure I'm going to be able to get the point across to the treasonous shithead if I don't explicitly tell him why he's in far deeper doo-doo than he thinks he is, and so is basically any Republican who

chooses to support Trump and Q.

(By the way, Mr. Former President, nice pin on that lapel. Yeah, The Storm is coming. You best hope you're in control of it when it gets here!)

First off, if we were actually playing poker, Irish Mike would long since have been “on the clock”. (For those who do not watch poker tournaments, when it is a player's turn and it is believed an excessive period of time is being taken, a

tournament director or similar authority can be brought over and a small further time period given before the player's hand is dead (folded).)

I think this is one of the main reasons I'm angry at him and at the MAGA/Republican crowd here. And there are numerous reasons why – of which this is hardly an exhaustive list...

* If it is correct as the Republicans believe that the stimuli and similar welfare expansions have either caused or contributed to the current inflation, would it not then be required to eliminate all of that and everyone and every business reliant

on same? Would that not make even the remotest concept of sense here? If you want prices back under control by contracting the money supply, then you must also eliminate the “useless eaters” and all of the other undesirables you have such a hard-on
on at least SAYING you need dead.

* If you believe that crime is so rampant in the cities, then why are you not doing two things, as military exercises?

First, taking over the cities from the inside out... Let me give you a little secret from my nine years on the streets – there is ZE and RO deterrent for a lot of these homeless people to gut the downtowns they are terrorizing. Jail, even prison,

is an IMPROVEMENT for many of them. And there's zero chance of employability.

Second, at some point before they DO come after you in the rural areas (and, trust me, they're more than expanding into the exurbs as we speak!), why are you not violently seizing power in cities like Baltimore, Chicago, Philadelphia, Seattle,

Portland, Oakland/San Francisco, LA all the way to the exurbs, etc. and so forth? And this can extend to states run by those cities like Illinois, California, Oregon, and Washington, etc... The problem you have with letting those cities die is you lose
the infrastructure, which will mean transport of goods will become far more difficult, if not impossible, once the cities are completely lost.

* A question I asked before of the Republican contingent here on RSFC, and I'm not exactly 100% sure anyone gave me a straight answer: Do you believe that Joe Biden is the legally-elected 46th President of the United States of America?

If that answer is, in any way, no: You have two major problems.

First, how does that not constitute “tyrannical government” on how you were taught that you had the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment? (And, if Ken Olson is correct that you fear arrest, then... guess what? YOU DON'T HAVE THAT RIGHT!!!

!) Restated: Have we not long passed the point when the militias and Oathkeepers should get their guns out of their anuses, put their clothes on, get a nutsack, and shoot the rest of us?

Second, how can another election feasibly be held – this Fall or at any feasible point in the future? I mean, I'm the first to understand that's the POINT of this (to end elections as they've been held), but the fact is, you aren't in power yet and

you still, if you continue to be inconsistent cowards about it all, need to rise back to sufficient power through... the very same elections you continue to slam as hopelessly corrupt!

* Dovetailing, since we are now apparent that not only does a significant amount of the populace, but Mr. Trump himself, believe he is still President of the United States in exile at Mar-a-Lago, at what point does the American Right realize that

either he is giving material aid and comfort to the enemies of our nation as an instrument of war (Saudi Arabia/Russia and others, with at least respect to the Ukraine conflict!), or the entire leftward portion of the country is doing same on a far more
domestic front (from the George Floyd riots forward, it is clear to anyone with open eyes that the Second American Civil War is now about 2 ½ years in progress!)?

* With the appropriate penalties (lethal) to the losing side, under the Constitution of the United States of America? (Though the Constitution does not proscribe the penalty for treason, that is the only crime which is defined therein.)

* Now, COVID: Since you have pretty much won the day in making sure this country is never adequately protected against COVID and that we never reach herd immunity, you are left with only a very few options:

1) You cannot feasibly avoid COVID, meaning that there's a good chance that each wave of this will wipe at least 1-1.5% of everyone who gets it – and probably far higher, since we have deliberately understated the death toll to this disease by a

significant multiplicative factor (I'm going about five here.)

2) Your misguided “science” (and it's funny you mention that, both in the fact that you have no desire to see people educated (or educated people!) and a “culture war” we'll get into later) is correct, and then you have about 60% of the

population of this country carrying not only a lethal clot virus, but also carrying a contagious disease with which we can kill you. You really wanna play with THOSE odds?

* Speaking of the “culture wars”, one final thing on this list: If you believe transgenderism (and the L's, B's, G's, Q's, non-binaries, etc.) are that abhorrent, then why aren't you making good on what many of them believe you want to do?

I'll expand on that last one to a more general comment: You talk about those of us on this side as we can't tell the difference between man and woman. I could easily counter by saying that your side doesn't even know human beings, one from the other.

You are trying to take us back “as the Fathers intended”, to a world in which the Dred Scott Decision actually referenced: Blacks are farm equipment, women are breeding stock, and everyone else is useless, savages, or just plain need to be eliminated
from the equation as an instrument of God and of White Male Landowners' Manifest Destiny.

In short, to use the poker analogy: We don't even agree on what three cards were flopped when I went All In! You think you've got a full house, aces over whatever, not realizing there's no third ace in the flop, nor a standing pair, and you've got

garbage, while I'm waiting for flush and straight draws, etc.

You don't want us showing up at the polls in eight weeks, kids. Because I do believe you will be defeated at least for the Senate. (You had such a lead for the House until Dobbs screwed a lot of things for you guys.)

But, in short, if your side wins out, I'm dead. And I already know that to be the case. And, unlike your side, many on mine aren't as cowardly as you think we are. And that's just the general shit. We haven't even got to the specifics with respect to

“assumed depravity”, etc., which increase the stakes for a lot of you even higher with me specifically.

(Because not only should the New York Police Department have splattered my brains all over the wall outside the Palace Theatre that night, but the fact is that if your side wins, I will go violent and show you that assumed depravity -- just not at

the target you think I will.)

All In, and you ARE on the clock, Republicans.

Some people make terrorist threats. Some people understand that we are terrorist threats and need not make them.

Mike

TL; DR.

+1

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 2:26:32 AM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:

I simultaneously can, and then cannot, believe I actually have to post this.

But, after Irish Mike's poker analogy, I'm not sure I'm going to be able to get the point across to the treasonous shithead if I don't explicitly tell him why he's in far deeper doo-doo than he thinks he is, and so is basically any Republican who

chooses to support Trump and Q.

“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom.
What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take away
from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea they do not have to work because the
other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good
to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about
the end of any nation . You cannot multiply wealth by dividing.’ Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931 – 2005.

Irish Mike

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 9:43:53 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:

“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom.

Freedom is a falsehood, often used as a cover by the preferred to justify actions like killing the "savages" during Manifest Destiny.

Debbie said this several months ago, as a good example of the falsehood:

"“FREEDOM is loving who you are and loving life, not because of or despite any external influences negative or positive. I hope you are feelin’ your vibe today and reminding yourself that you are worthy of all love all-ways !!!”"

You can't do that in today's day and age. It's not doable. You have no such right, as it devolves down to the right to liberty and to pursue happiness you do not have in this society until someone says yes to you first.

(You don't even have the right to life, as God's Will can take that from you at any time at His sole election -- the only other alternative is to deny His existence in the name of "bad things happen to good people".)

But the fact is, even liberty and to pursue happiness are privileges given to you by society/government.

The problem with that first concept of the quote you give is the wealthy are already legislated out of freedom BY THE MERE EXISTENCE OF US POOR. One great example of that is the current state of most of the left-wing cities -- and it is the exact reason
that you must take Second Amendment measures to end it.

Criminals have more legitimate purpose than many law-abiding citizens. In many cases, the police WANT those who want the laws enforced removed, because the criminals might have the legitimate purpose to not only shape the cities as the politicos would
want it, but to remove other criminals the police demand dead.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

Then you must eliminate those who refuse to work. Some of us realize that hard work is a similar farce and falsehood. When studies come out stating that psychopathy is actually a desirable trait among a number of the top CEO's, it does kind of take the
entire apple cart of right and wrong and inverts it.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take away
from somebody else.

Then you must also understand that applies to life itself, especially when you operate in such a manner consistent to Originalism. As far as I go, I tried to be a productive person and try to do things as I saw was the right way -- the fact is, anything
not serial rape or murder was, is, and remains delusional. I thank God for that delusion, but that doesn't do the rest of you any good.

When half of the people get the idea they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good
to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about
the end of any nation .

And that second portion of the "about the end of any nation" works both ways on the economic scale -- both to the welfare state and to the CEO's.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing.’ Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931 – 2005.

Then you must subtract. Population.

Mike

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 9:59:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Falkner wrote:

On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 9:43:53 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:

“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom.

Freedom is a falsehood, often used as a cover by the preferred to justify actions like killing the "savages" during Manifest Destiny.

Debbie said this several months ago, as a good example of the falsehood:

"“FREEDOM is loving who you are and loving life, not because of or despite any external influences negative or positive. I hope you are feelin’ your vibe today and reminding yourself that you are worthy of all love all-ways !!!”"

You can't do that in today's day and age. It's not doable. You have no such right, as it devolves down to the right to liberty and to pursue happiness you do not have in this society until someone says yes to you first.

(You don't even have the right to life, as God's Will can take that from you at any time at His sole election -- the only other alternative is to deny His existence in the name of "bad things happen to good people".)

But the fact is, even liberty and to pursue happiness are privileges given to you by society/government.

The problem with that first concept of the quote you give is the wealthy are already legislated out of freedom BY THE MERE EXISTENCE OF US POOR. One great example of that is the current state of most of the left-wing cities -- and it is the exact

reason that you must take Second Amendment measures to end it.

Criminals have more legitimate purpose than many law-abiding citizens. In many cases, the police WANT those who want the laws enforced removed, because the criminals might have the legitimate purpose to not only shape the cities as the politicos would

want it, but to remove other criminals the police demand dead.

What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.

Then you must eliminate those who refuse to work. Some of us realize that hard work is a similar farce and falsehood. When studies come out stating that psychopathy is actually a desirable trait among a number of the top CEO's, it does kind of take the

entire apple cart of right and wrong and inverts it.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take away
from somebody else.

Then you must also understand that applies to life itself, especially when you operate in such a manner consistent to Originalism. As far as I go, I tried to be a productive person and try to do things as I saw was the right way -- the fact is,

anything not serial rape or murder was, is, and remains delusional. I thank God for that delusion, but that doesn't do the rest of you any good.

When half of the people get the idea they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good
to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about
the end of any nation .

And that second portion of the "about the end of any nation" works both ways on the economic scale -- both to the welfare state and to the CEO's.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing.’ Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931 – 2005.

Then you must subtract. Population.

Mike

Irish Mike... tell me this fool doesn't remind you of Igotskilz from rec.gambling.poker This clown is as goofy as a pet coon. And Kolorado Keyboard Kowboy, before you start all that give me you address bullshit, you give me your address if you're such
a brave tough guy. I'll damn sure look you up.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 3:29:18 PM UTC-7, cork...@gmail.com wrote:

Irish Mike... tell me this fool doesn't remind you of Igotskilz from rec.gambling.poker This clown is as goofy as a pet coon. And Kolorado Keyboard Kowboy, before you start all that give me you address bullshit, you give me your address if you're such

a brave tough guy. I'll damn sure look you up.

Nice try, bitch. Why don't you at least give me the city you live in and we'll "talk".

The fact of the matter is, shithead: People, and powerful people, thought I was going to slit the throat of a Broadway singer. Who the fuck are you (or Irish Mike, or any of the other Republicans here) to think you'd get better?

Mike

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 11:00:40 PM UTC-5, Michael Falkner wrote:

On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 3:29:18 PM UTC-7, cork...@gmail.com wrote:

Irish Mike... tell me this fool doesn't remind you of Igotskilz from rec.gambling.poker This clown is as goofy as a pet coon. And Kolorado Keyboard Kowboy, before you start all that give me you address bullshit, you give me your address if you're

such a brave tough guy. I'll damn sure look you up.

Nice try, bitch. Why don't you at least give me the city you live in and we'll "talk".

The fact of the matter is, shithead: People, and powerful people, thought I was going to slit the throat of a Broadway singer. Who the fuck are you (or Irish Mike, or any of the other Republicans here) to think you'd get better?

Mike

That's what I thought, let me add Kowardly to Kolorado Keyboard Kowboy

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Anytime you wanna rumble, let me know where, bitch.

Mike

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, September 16, 2022 at 7:57:47 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:

Anytime you wanna rumble, let me know where, bitch.

Mike

https://www.reddit.com/r/socialskills/comments/mppb1v/why_do_some_people_talk_tough_and_put_up_a_tough/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I'm sorry. I'm just done with a lot of this shit and if the MAGAts wanna rumble, have a set between your legs and tell me where to show up.

Treasonous cunts.

Mike

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 12:58:02 PM UTC-7, Demaryius wrote:

Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> wrote in news:f52cf3a3-ffd9-4377...@googlegroups.com:

I'm sorry. I'm just done with a lot of this shit and if the MAGAts
wanna rumble, have a set between your legs and tell me where to show
up.

Treasonous cunts.

You're a blue state pussy and you won't show up, Riverside boy.

You're all mouth and assless chaps.

Do something about it, shithead.

Mike

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)