1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.FOOTBALL.COLLEG

  • Is It Senatorial...

    From Ken Olson@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 11 12:14:00 2022
    to threaten the Supreme Court?
    --
    ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

    Слава Україні та НАТО

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Olson@21:1/5 to unhyphenated American on Sat Jun 11 14:05:11 2022
    On 6/11/2022 1:35 PM, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
    On 2022-06-11, Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org> wrote:
    to threaten the Supreme Court?

    No. And, laughably, the media rushes to Schumer's defense with headlines
    like these:

    Republicans Smearing Chuck Schumer With Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt

    They claim that he was only talking about political pressure when he said that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh "wouldn't know what hit them". What political pressure is available to put on Supreme Court justices, pray tell?


    There shouldn't be any.

    --
    ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

    Слава Україні та НАТО

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Con Reeder, unhyphenated American@21:1/5 to Ken Olson on Sat Jun 11 17:35:01 2022
    On 2022-06-11, Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org> wrote:
    to threaten the Supreme Court?

    No. And, laughably, the media rushes to Schumer's defense with headlines
    like these:

    Republicans Smearing Chuck Schumer With Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt

    They claim that he was only talking about political pressure when he said
    that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh "wouldn't know what hit them". What political pressure is available to put on Supreme Court justices, pray tell?

    --
    If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of
    car payments. -- Earl Wilson

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From xyzzy@21:1/5 to unhyphenated American on Sat Jun 11 19:28:54 2022
    Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
    On 2022-06-11, Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org> wrote:
    to threaten the Supreme Court?

    No. And, laughably, the media rushes to Schumer's defense with headlines
    like these:

    Republicans Smearing Chuck Schumer With Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt

    They claim that he was only talking about political pressure when he said that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh "wouldn't know what hit them". What political pressure is available to put on Supreme Court justices, pray tell?


    It’s terrible what happened to Kavanaugh. But it would be demagoguery and irresponsible to use this tragedy to make any meaningful changes. This is a time for thoughts and prayers, not politicization of this tragedy.

    ($)

    --
    “I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, liberal personality.” — Altie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Ramon@21:1/5 to unhyphenated American on Sat Jun 11 14:49:55 2022
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-7, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
    Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to influence sitting judges?


    more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump for treason?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Con Reeder, unhyphenated American@21:1/5 to xyzzy on Sat Jun 11 21:33:00 2022
    On 2022-06-11, xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com> wrote:
    Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
    On 2022-06-11, Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org> wrote:
    to threaten the Supreme Court?

    No. And, laughably, the media rushes to Schumer's defense with headlines
    like these:

    Republicans Smearing Chuck Schumer With Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt >>
    They claim that he was only talking about political pressure when he said
    that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh "wouldn't know what hit them". What political
    pressure is available to put on Supreme Court justices, pray tell?


    It’s terrible what happened to Kavanaugh. But it would be demagoguery and irresponsible to use this tragedy to make any meaningful changes. This is a time for thoughts and prayers, not politicization of this tragedy.

    If so, why did Schumer resort to threats? Why hasn't the Democrat power structure condemned demonstrations at justices houses? Why is the DOJ under Garland not enforcing laws against trying to influence sitting judges?

    --
    Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed. -- Francis Bacon

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Olson@21:1/5 to Eric Ramon on Sat Jun 11 18:20:35 2022
    On 6/11/2022 5:49 PM, Eric Ramon wrote:
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-7, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
    Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to influence sitting judges?


    more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump for treason?

    Must not have the evidence.

    --
    ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

    Слава Україні та НАТО

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoddyMcCorley@21:1/5 to Ken Olson on Sun Jun 12 01:31:57 2022
    On 6/11/2022 6:20 PM, Ken Olson wrote:
    On 6/11/2022 5:49 PM, Eric Ramon wrote:
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-7, Con Reeder,
    unhyphenated American wrote:
    Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to
    influence sitting judges?


    more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump for
    treason?

    Must not have the evidence.

    You can come out from under that rock now.

    --
    "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In
    practice, there is." Ruben Goldberg

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Olson@21:1/5 to RoddyMcCorley on Sun Jun 12 02:17:03 2022
    On 6/12/2022 1:31 AM, RoddyMcCorley wrote:
    On 6/11/2022 6:20 PM, Ken Olson wrote:
    On 6/11/2022 5:49 PM, Eric Ramon wrote:
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-7, Con Reeder,
    unhyphenated American wrote:
    Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to
    influence sitting judges?


    more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump
    for treason?

    Must not have the evidence.

    You can come out from under that rock now.


    Or they don't want to set precedence because it could bite them in the ass.

    --
    ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

    Слава Україні та НАТО

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Con Reeder, unhyphenated American@21:1/5 to Eric Ramon on Sun Jun 12 13:20:14 2022
    On 2022-06-11, Eric Ramon <ramon.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-7, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
    Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to influence sitting judges?


    more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump for treason?

    It's the whatabout dance!

    --
    Experience is what allows you to recognize a mistake the second time you
    make it. -- unknown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Falkner@21:1/5 to Ken Olson on Sun Jun 12 08:09:27 2022
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 9:14:05 AM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:
    to threaten the Supreme Court?

    Do something about it.

    (In short, yes -- when the circumstances require.)

    Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Falkner@21:1/5 to Ken Olson on Sun Jun 12 08:10:16 2022
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 3:20:40 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:
    On 6/11/2022 5:49 PM, Eric Ramon wrote:

    more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump for treason?

    Must not have the evidence.

    Or fearful The Proud Boys might mean it this time.

    Mike (which see my earlier question -- why didn't they shoot on J6? Cowards. Pussies.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)