On 2022-06-11, Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org> wrote:
to threaten the Supreme Court?
No. And, laughably, the media rushes to Schumer's defense with headlines
like these:
Republicans Smearing Chuck Schumer With Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt
They claim that he was only talking about political pressure when he said that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh "wouldn't know what hit them". What political pressure is available to put on Supreme Court justices, pray tell?
to threaten the Supreme Court?
On 2022-06-11, Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org> wrote:
to threaten the Supreme Court?
No. And, laughably, the media rushes to Schumer's defense with headlines
like these:
Republicans Smearing Chuck Schumer With Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt
They claim that he was only talking about political pressure when he said that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh "wouldn't know what hit them". What political pressure is available to put on Supreme Court justices, pray tell?
Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to influence sitting judges?
Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
On 2022-06-11, Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org> wrote:
to threaten the Supreme Court?
No. And, laughably, the media rushes to Schumer's defense with headlines
like these:
Republicans Smearing Chuck Schumer With Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt >>
They claim that he was only talking about political pressure when he said
that Gorsuch and Kavanaugh "wouldn't know what hit them". What political
pressure is available to put on Supreme Court justices, pray tell?
It’s terrible what happened to Kavanaugh. But it would be demagoguery and irresponsible to use this tragedy to make any meaningful changes. This is a time for thoughts and prayers, not politicization of this tragedy.
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-7, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to influence sitting judges?
more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump for treason?
On 6/11/2022 5:49 PM, Eric Ramon wrote:
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-7, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to
influence sitting judges?
more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump for
treason?
Must not have the evidence.
On 6/11/2022 6:20 PM, Ken Olson wrote:
On 6/11/2022 5:49 PM, Eric Ramon wrote:You can come out from under that rock now.
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-7, Con Reeder,
unhyphenated American wrote:
Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to
influence sitting judges?
more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump
for treason?
Must not have the evidence.
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 2:33:04 PM UTC-7, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
Why is the DOJ under > Garland not enforcing laws against trying to influence sitting judges?
more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump for treason?
to threaten the Supreme Court?
On 6/11/2022 5:49 PM, Eric Ramon wrote:
more importantly, why is the DOJ under Garland not indicting Trump for treason?
Must not have the evidence.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 388 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 08:03:37 |
| Calls: | 8,221 |
| Files: | 13,122 |
| Messages: | 5,872,471 |