• The wages of pathetically bad leadership

    From Con Reeder, unhyphenated American@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 10 17:03:57 2022
    If you had been trying to create high inflation and a recession, there is nothing you could do that would be any more effective than what the Democrats did. (And it would have been worse if they had gotten their heart's desire, "Build Back Better".)

    1. From day one, move to make fuel and energy more expensive. After all, energy shocks are proven to create recessions.

    2. Inject huge amounts of borrowed money into the economy with the largest-ever spending bill, passed on party line with reconciliation.

    3. Spend what money you have with productivity-killers like unemployment, loans for prostitutes and scammers, and canceling student debt.

    Voila! Here we are.

    I am not pretending that we wouldn't have had some economic problems if the Republicans had won and the prior policies would have continued. (Of course
    the Dems would have reaped the political rewards of that and regained control of Congress in 2022.) But I will say that the improved productivity, marginally better fiscal restraint, and greatly improved energy policy would have made things much better than they are.

    I'm losing a lot of money, of course, but I am lucky. The people taking it on the chin, as usual, are the poor. Expect 100 million to starve worldwide, and
    a billion to slip back to abject poverty. Thanks, Democrats. As usual, socialism
    kills.

    --
    "I find that a great part of the information I have was acquired
    by looking up something and finding something else on the way."
    -- Franklin Pierce Adams

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From xyzzy@21:1/5 to unhyphenated American on Sat Jun 11 00:35:38 2022
    Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
    If you had been trying to create high inflation and a recession, there is nothing you could do that would be any more effective than what the Democrats did. (And it would have been worse if they had gotten their heart's desire, "Build Back Better".)

    1. From day one, move to make fuel and energy more expensive. After all, energy
    shocks are proven to create recessions.

    So let’s talk about energy.

    US refining capacity went down by 800,000 barrels per day in 2020. During
    the last administration.

    The Ukraine war and our sanctions on Russia have also raised prices. Republicans supported that (and in fact complained it didn’t go far enough)


    The Trump administration put a 10 year moratorium on oil and gas prices in
    the eastern Gulf of Mexico, to get Florida votes.

    And then there’s this: https://twitter.com/petel1973/status/1535364932023230465?s=21&t=YjAX1r6UkfKMyOijDH7zHw
    (Trump bragging about a deal with Saudi Arabia to cut oil production to
    help prop up oil prices in 2020. Now Biden is having to go to Saudi Arabia
    to try to convince them to reverse this deal

    I’m not saying Biden’s policies on energy have been ideal. But there were plenty of Republican policies that contributed too, and their effect is as
    big or bigger than any Biden policies.

    2. Inject huge amounts of borrowed money into the economy with the largest-ever
    spending bill, passed on party line with reconciliation.

    3. Spend what money you have with productivity-killers like unemployment, loans
    for prostitutes and scammers, and canceling student debt.

    Most of that has been over for a long time and one of it (student debt cancellation) hasn’t happened.

    Oh and you forgot one: punitive trade war tariffs, which Trump imposed.
    Sure Biden should reverse them and hasn’t, but that’s a Trump policy yet you labor under the illusion that he’s the good policy decision maker.

    Voila! Here we are.

    I am not pretending that we wouldn't have had some economic problems if the Republicans had won and the prior policies would have continued. (Of course the Dems would have reaped the political rewards of that and regained control of Congress in 2022.) But I will say that the improved productivity, marginally
    better fiscal restraint, and greatly improved energy policy would have made things much better than they are.

    I'm losing a lot of money, of course, but I am lucky. The people taking it on the chin, as usual, are the poor. Expect 100 million to starve worldwide, and a billion to slip back to abject poverty. Thanks, Democrats. As usual, socialism
    kills.




    --
    “I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, liberal personality.” — Altie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Falkner@21:1/5 to unhyphenated American on Fri Jun 10 19:48:16 2022
    On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 10:04:01 AM UTC-7, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:

    1. From day one, move to make fuel and energy more expensive. After all, energy
    shocks are proven to create recessions.

    If you won't Stay The Fuck At Home one way, then we're going to make it punitive on you.

    2. Inject huge amounts of borrowed money into the economy with the largest-ever
    spending bill, passed on party line with reconciliation.

    Most every business in this country DIES in the March 2020-? timeframe without the stimuli.

    Just admit you want the unproductive to die.

    3. Spend what money you have with productivity-killers like unemployment, loans
    for prostitutes and scammers, and canceling student debt.

    Then start killing the unproductive. You'd have to about halve the current US population.

    The only way you get productivity is through making every choice to do otherwise a Hobson's.

    I am not pretending that we wouldn't have had some economic problems if the Republicans had won and the prior policies would have continued. (Of course the Dems would have reaped the political rewards of that and regained control of Congress in 2022.) But I will say that the improved productivity, marginally
    better fiscal restraint, and greatly improved energy policy would have made things much better than they are.

    No, because, at that point, eliminative Martial Law would've been the only way through.

    Remember, also, that more than a few of the Q Brigade believe those of us who are vaccinated are spreading it ourselves.

    I'm losing a lot of money, of course, but I am lucky. The people taking it on the chin, as usual, are the poor. Expect 100 million to starve worldwide, and a billion to slip back to abject poverty. Thanks, Democrats. As usual, socialism
    kills.

    Socialism has saved 100 million (current) lives in this country. The problem is whether you think that is a good thing -- and I don't think Conservatives can believe that.

    You need The Purge. And you need it NOW.

    Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Olson@21:1/5 to unhyphenated American on Sat Jun 11 10:37:32 2022
    On 6/10/2022 1:03 PM, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
    If you had been trying to create high inflation and a recession, there is nothing you could do that would be any more effective than what the Democrats did. (And it would have been worse if they had gotten their heart's desire, "Build Back Better".)

    1. From day one, move to make fuel and energy more expensive. After all, energy
    shocks are proven to create recessions.

    2. Inject huge amounts of borrowed money into the economy with the largest-ever
    spending bill, passed on party line with reconciliation.

    3. Spend what money you have with productivity-killers like unemployment, loans
    for prostitutes and scammers, and canceling student debt.

    Voila! Here we are.

    I am not pretending that we wouldn't have had some economic problems if the Republicans had won and the prior policies would have continued. (Of course the Dems would have reaped the political rewards of that and regained control of Congress in 2022.) But I will say that the improved productivity, marginally
    better fiscal restraint, and greatly improved energy policy would have made things much better than they are.

    I'm losing a lot of money, of course, but I am lucky. The people taking it on the chin, as usual, are the poor. Expect 100 million to starve worldwide, and a billion to slip back to abject poverty. Thanks, Democrats. As usual, socialism
    kills.


    +1

    --
    ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

    Слава Україні та НАТО

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Con Reeder, unhyphenated American@21:1/5 to xyzzy on Sat Jun 11 17:29:41 2022
    On 2022-06-11, xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com> wrote:
    Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
    If you had been trying to create high inflation and a recession, there is
    nothing you could do that would be any more effective than what the Democrats
    did. (And it would have been worse if they had gotten their heart's desire, >> "Build Back Better".)

    1. From day one, move to make fuel and energy more expensive. After all, energy
    shocks are proven to create recessions.

    So let’s talk about energy.

    US refining capacity went down by 800,000 barrels per day in 2020. During
    the last administration.

    The Ukraine war and our sanctions on Russia have also raised prices. Republicans supported that (and in fact complained it didn’t go far enough)


    The Trump administration put a 10 year moratorium on oil and gas prices in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, to get Florida votes.

    And then there’s this: https://twitter.com/petel1973/status/1535364932023230465?s=21&t=YjAX1r6UkfKMyOijDH7zHw
    (Trump bragging about a deal with Saudi Arabia to cut oil production to
    help prop up oil prices in 2020. Now Biden is having to go to Saudi Arabia
    to try to convince them to reverse this deal

    I’m not saying Biden’s policies on energy have been ideal. But there were plenty of Republican policies that contributed too, and their effect is as big or bigger than any Biden policies.

    Apparently the market disagrees. Will there be ebbs and flows in any
    industry? Sure. But when they are all one way that turns the tide.
    Biden reined in none of the negatives and dampened all the positives.
    He sent a signal, as did the rest of the left with the ESG crap which
    is ridiculous bullshit. See the great talk by Stuart Kirk of HSBC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfNamRmje-s

    Again, I didn't pretend there wouldn't have been problems under Trump. But
    the Democrats stated they were at war with fossil fuels, targeted investment
    in "green" energy, and we have reaped the results of that. Investment follows sentiment.


    2. Inject huge amounts of borrowed money into the economy with the largest-ever
    spending bill, passed on party line with reconciliation.

    3. Spend what money you have with productivity-killers like unemployment, loans
    for prostitutes and scammers, and canceling student debt.

    Most of that has been over for a long time and one of it (student debt cancellation) hasn’t happened.

    But the targeting of money to Democrat priorities did happen, and it
    is mostly productivity killers. Sending more money to terrible
    teachers in ludicrously bad urban schools does nothing good for our
    economy. Ladling money out so fast that billion after billion gets
    grabbed by thieves is not good. Remember Democrats complaining that
    Florida was making it difficult to get unemployment and PPP money?
    Well, yes, if you actually go through the process of verifying the
    claims, that takes some time. California, on the other hand, made it
    very easy, and billions went to fraudsters including tens of millions
    to *inmates in prison*.


    Oh and you forgot one: punitive trade war tariffs, which Trump imposed.
    Sure Biden should reverse them and hasn’t, but that’s a Trump policy yet you labor under the illusion that he’s the good policy decision maker.

    Again, did I claim that 100% of Trump's policies were good? I did not. And
    you can point to negatives anywhere. It doesn't change the fact that Biden spent huge amounts that even people in his own party were leery of. They
    didn't listen to Larry Summers nor anyone. That is the risk of rammed-through party-line legislation. You have no brakes and ultimately no one else to blame.

    The results speak for themselves. Again, I said that I thought there would
    have been some problems regardless. What the Democrats have done is exacerbated the things that were building anyway. They stated they were going to make fossil
    fuels difficult, and by God, they succeeded. That and the ARP was the gasoline added to a fire that was no doubt already being stoked.

    --
    "It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
    from natural variation." - Bob Carter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Con Reeder, unhyphenated American@21:1/5 to unhyphenated American on Sat Jun 18 13:14:58 2022
    On 2022-06-11, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
    On 2022-06-11, xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com> wrote:
    Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <constance@duxmail.com> wrote:
    2. Inject huge amounts of borrowed money into the economy with the largest-ever
    spending bill, passed on party line with reconciliation.

    3. Spend what money you have with productivity-killers like unemployment, loans
    for prostitutes and scammers, and canceling student debt.

    Most of that has been over for a long time and one of it (student debt
    cancellation) hasn’t happened.

    But the targeting of money to Democrat priorities did happen, and it
    is mostly productivity killers. Sending more money to terrible
    teachers in ludicrously bad urban schools does nothing good for our
    economy. Ladling money out so fast that billion after billion gets
    grabbed by thieves is not good. Remember Democrats complaining that
    Florida was making it difficult to get unemployment and PPP money?
    Well, yes, if you actually go through the process of verifying the
    claims, that takes some time. California, on the other hand, made it
    very easy, and billions went to fraudsters including tens of millions
    to *inmates in prison*.

    And here's Illinois, rushing to send unemployment to all of those
    diverse and needy people:

    Illinois paid out nearly $2 billion in federal funds for
    fraudulent pandemic unemployment claims, audit finds

    By Joe Mahr and Dan Petrella Chicago Tribune Jun 16, 2022 at 5:06 pm

    Fraudsters stole more than half the money paid out by the
    state from a special pandemic unemployment fund, pilfering
    nearly $2 billion in federal money that was supposed to
    help out-of-work Illinoisans, according to a state audit
    released Thursday.

    The audit offers the first estimate for Illinois’ share of
    the mammoth fraud that swept the country during the pandemic
    as states were hit with a deluge of unemployment claims. The
    audit covers much of the period the program was in use, from
    July 2020 through June 2021.

    Florida is so damn cruel, making people wait while they verify their eligibility.

    --
    Making the simple complex, that is easy -- anyone can do that.
    But to make the complex simple, awesomely simple, that is
    true creativity. -- Charles Mingus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)