Even though today is the start of the J6 hearings, I think it's clear the White Right has won.never mind that, short of raising someone to be a Kyle Rittenhouse or the like, you're out of your mind raising a White child in this country at this point...).
1) Biden must resign. As soon as feasibly possible.
To say he's unfit for the office is, simultaneously, irrelevant and quite scary.
My honest hope would be that Kamala Harris does get the office of President well before the midterms, because the fact of the matter is, it's not going to matter. Biden, Harris, Pelosi, the Obamas, etc. have about 2 1/2 years to live -- if that.
You will see those gallows erected, and they will hang -- and then many millions of us will have to go with them.
2) If the Progressive way of life is that out of touch with reality, then the fact is that the very fact we are allowed to live at all as Progressives is also that degree of out of touch.
In short, you are going to have to kill us. Millions of us. Now.
The fact of the matter is that what we stand for and what we believe in is completely antithetical to the entire concept of governance the Fathers had.
The Fathers never intended us to live if we did not live in legitimate purpose to the law -- even if that legitimate purpose was solely to be enslaved, beaten, and eventually killed when our use expired.
The fact we have 340,000,000 people censused in this country is an abomination to anyone on the Rightward side of the equation.
But the facts are simple:
3) If you do not have legitimate purpose to Republican Man rule, you will die.
Not being heterosexual will be an illegality in this country in three years.
Transgenderism is probably a death penalty offense within a month or two of the installation of the permanent Republican regime.
Women will have no use above the age of about 40, if they had use below it in the first place.
Men will be called upon to impregnate anyone they can feasibly find to bring White Man back to the forefront of the country -- almost three-quarters of Trump supporters believe in "replacement theory", that the Blacks are trying to replace Whites (
4) There will be a Constitutional Convention in this country in 2025 (or the first year of permanent Republican rule, whichever comes first).deliberate miscounting, but that the election was never legally held.
The first ten Amendments will be replaced with a Bill of Responsibilities, in the line of Scalia and Thomas.
The 13th, 14th, and 19th are the next three to go.
5) If you are not White, cis-Male, Old Testament Christian, willing to kill the "others", a landowner, etc., prepare to either be permanently subjugated or killed. You have three years, tops, to live.
6) I'm not even sure this one can wait til the midterms: You will need to raise a militia and liquidate the cities of crime elements: Homeless, gangs, theft rings, etc.
7) You will then need to seize the governments of those cities and of at least the three West Coast states, etc., with lethal force.
Not doing so will mean you have no ports, and you will end up with a situation that you will not get any materials from the outside going forward. You will lose all meaningful infrastructure, etc.
8 and last) If the Red Tsunami occurs, you must attempt to seize the Presidency at the first real opportunity -- and it must be the last election held in this country for a significant period of time.
This last one is just common sense. Forget the people who can legally vote whom you do not desire the right to vote. That's one massive group.
But how can you hold an election when it is clear that entire states and voting rolls are as compromised as you believe they are?
Not only that, but that compromised nature should actually raise a Constitutional question (not known until AFTER Biden took office, see the decisions in Pennsylvania for one!) as to whether Biden ever legally won the election, not as a function of
Pennsylvania's 20 Electoral Votes from 2020 are void. The Presidential election has now been ruled TWICE by state courts to be illegally held.
The margin is so razor-thin in Georgia that there's effectively zero chance the 16 EVs in Georgia could not be voided as well.
That gets Biden to 270. Find one more, and Congress should have the legal right to revoke consent, rendering Biden "never President", meaning the new Congress' Speaker of the House takes the power.
And that's how you get Trump back.
Mike
Cliffs?
4) There will be a Constitutional Convention in this country in 2025 (or the first year of permanent Republican rule, whichever comes first).
The first ten Amendments will be replaced with a Bill of Responsibilities, in the line of Scalia and Thomas.
The 13th, 14th, and 19th are the next three to go.
Er, unless you want to burn the entire Constitution and start from scratch (and I have a feeling a number of Democrats aren't against this, because it is the only way to change the Senate from "every state gets the same number of Senators"), anyamendment passed by a Constitutional Convention still has to be ratified by 3/4 of the states. Nothing new about this; the original Constitution had to be ratified this way as well. Delaware is "the first state" because it was the first to ratify it.
Look up the "Convention of States" movement or whatever it is called. And then understand that certain Conservatives are correct: Once you open the doors to this, it's ALL on the table.
states (and still doesn't get around the "you can't give any State more or fewer Senators than the others" problem).Look up the "Convention of States" movement or whatever it is called. And then understand that certain Conservatives are correct: Once you open the doors to this, it's ALL on the table.Every "convention of states" I have heard talked about implies, if not outright specifies, that it is done in accordance with the current Constitution, which requires that any amendments coming out of such a convention still be ratified by 3/4 of the
As for "it's all on the table," obviously you've never seen my laundry list of things to be proposed (from both sides) should there ever be a Constitutional Convention that I post to Facebook every few months:
Overturn
...Citizens United v. FEC
...Obergefell v. Hodges
...Roe v. Wade (oh, wait...)
Repeal
...the first paragraph of the 14th Amendment
...the 2nd Amendment
...the 16th Amendment (income tax)
...the 22nd Amendment (two-term Presidential limit)
...the exception for prisoners to the ban on involuntary servitude in the 13th Amendment
The President and Vice-President of the United States shall be elected by plurality vote of the people.
All (choose one: citizens, residents, persons) are entitled to (choose one or more of: free health care, free public university undergraduate education).
The living parents of someone born in this country become citizens automatically.
The burning or other desecration of the flag of the United States is not protected under the first amendment.
The District of Columbia shall be entitled to one Representative and two Senators, and each Territory whose citizens pay income tax to the United States shall be entitled to one Representative and one Senator; however, the Territories shall not beentitled to Presidential electors.
Marriage shall be:
...limited to one man and one woman
...allowed between any two consenting persons of legal age (optionally add: except that the Congress may restrict marriages based on blood relationships)
Persons who are neither citizens nor legal residents of the United States shall not be counted for purposes of apportioning seats in the House of Representatives.
The membership of the House of Representatives shall be determined by a nationwide vote of the people casting votes for political parties, with each party receiving seats based on the number of votes received; the Congress shall decide how todistribute the seats among the States, and each State shall decide who its Representatives will be, in line with the results of the vote.
The right of the President of the United States to grant reprieves and pardons shall not apply to the President granting a self-reprieve or self-pardon, nor to granting a repreieve, pardon, or reduction of sentence, to a person for a crime that aidedthe President.
No person shall be eligible for the office of President or Vice-President of the United States who was not eligible to be elected President at the start of the term in which that person would hold office. (This prevents Obama or Bush from claiming, "The Constitution says I can't be ELECTED President again. It says NOTHING about becoming President through other methods, including being Vice-President first.)
The right to “free exercise of religion” does not prohibit Congress from taxing churches or other religious organizations, or from setting conditions pertaining to which churches shall be taxed, and the rate of tax for each. ("You want to ban yourpriests/ministers from conducting same-sex marriages? There's a price for that now...")
The Supreme Court of the United States shall consist of a Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices, any six of whom shall constitute a quorum. (No, the number of justices does not already appear anywhere in the Constitution.)
When the required Oath of Office of President of the United States includes the word “swear,” it shall end with, “so help me, God.” (No, "So Help Me, God" does not appear in the Constitution, either, which makes sense, as if you "affirm" ratherthan "swear," you are not swearing to any deity.)
If any bill passed by both the House and Senate and presented to the President not be returned within ten days, it shall be a law as if the President had signed it (Sundays and the adjournment of Congress notwithstanding).
The President has the power to rescind a pardon granted by a previous President, and trials for crimes for which a pardon has been rescinded shall not be considered to violate the Fifth Amendment.
Congress shall have the authority to impose a tax on a person’s or corporation’s wealth, including the value of any possessions held outside of the country.
The Constitution says I can't be ELECTED President again. It says NOTHING about becoming President through other methods, including being Vice-President first.)No person shall be eligible for the office of President or Vice-President of the United States who was not eligible to be elected President at the start of the term in which that person would hold office. (This prevents Obama or Bush from claiming, "
That's already in the 12th, IIRC. First off, no person can be VP who can't be President -- that's already in the Constitution. What that would do is not dissimilar to my proposal of revoking consent to the election. The election would have factuallybeen illegal in the first place, and that's a Constitutional crisis in the first place.
But the hypothetical statement is flatly incorrect. It is in the Constitution that you cannot be VP if you are ineligible to be President.
The Supreme Court of the United States shall consist of a Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices, any six of whom shall constitute a quorum. (No, the number of justices does not already appear anywhere in the Constitution.)Then why can no attempt to "pack the Court" be made right now? Serious question.
If any bill passed by both the House and Senate and presented to the President not be returned within ten days, it shall be a law as if the President had signed it (Sundays and the adjournment of Congress notwithstanding).Article 1, Section 7. Already exists. The only difference is the pocket veto if Congress adjourns in the interim.
Now if you are proposing an amendment to remove the pocket veto...
Congress shall have the authority to impose a tax on a person’s or corporation’s wealth, including the value of any possessions held outside of the country.Does that not already occur?
While the 12th Amendment says that no person constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President can be VP, nowhere does it say that someone who has served two terms (or one term plus two years of someone else's term) cannot become President bya method besides being elected - it certainly does not say that in the 22nd Amendment, which VERY clearly says only they cannot be "elected" President. This means that they are still "constitutionally eligible" to be President, and therefore can be
Then why can no attempt to "pack the Court" be made right now? Serious question.What makes you think AOC hasn't been calling for this for years? It doesn't happen for the same reason the Senate filibuster is still there - both sides are afraid of the response should they be the first to do it.
in October" opening of each Supreme Court session isn't in there). And yes, this does put an end to the unoverrideable veto.That, and the fact that, currently, you don't count Sundays in the ten-day period. I'm pretty sure this is the only reference to a particular day of the week in the Constitution that still has any effect (I was surprised to discover the "first MondayIf any bill passed by both the House and Senate and presented to the President not be returned within ten days, it shall be a law as if the President had signed it (Sundays and the adjournment of Congress notwithstanding).Article 1, Section 7. Already exists. The only difference is the pocket veto if Congress adjourns in the interim.
Now if you are proposing an amendment to remove the pocket veto...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 109:29:06 |
| Calls: | 6,701 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,348,534 |