Quoted from Russian state TVhttps://tenor.com/view/sleepy-joe-gif-18788645
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1508943310483767302?s=21&t=uh_VFGjFztLQlrEYkwBmww
--
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, liberal personality.” — Altie
But first, we have to send in our contributions to the RNC to elect "Trump Republican Majorities" in Congress. Seriously, that's what the RNC's latest begging letter calls them. What's next - officially renaming the party the Trump Republican Party?
Quoted from Russian state TV
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1508943310483767302?s=21&t=uh_VFGjFztLQlrEYkwBmww
But first, we have to send in our contributions to the RNC to elect "Trump Republican Majorities" in Congress. Seriously, that's what the RNC's latest begging letter calls them. What's next - officially renaming the party the Trump Republican Party?
I fully see an effort, should they gain both houses, to nullify the 2020 election by rescinding consent by binding resolution in Congress, succeeding the Speaker of the House to the Presidency (and, remember, the Speaker does NOT have to be an electedmember of the House!), and daring a majority of the Supreme Court to stop them. The (non-Q non-"Harris is not eligible") grounds would be the unconstitutional nature, as decided by states like Pennsylvania, of the 2020 election. Simple majority would be
(This is why I think the GQP allowing the nomination of the new Justice to proceed and be confirmed a colossal mistake. They would've had a 6-2 Court in that kind of a situation -- now it's 6-3 and no GQPer thinks Roberts is reliable.)
I fully see an effort, should they gain both houses, to nullify the 2020
election by rescinding consent by binding resolution in Congress,
succeeding the Speaker of the House to the Presidency (and, remember,
the Speaker does NOT have to be an elected member of the House!), and
daring a majority of the Supreme Court to stop them. The (non-Q
non-"Harris is not eligible") grounds would be the unconstitutional
nature, as decided by states like Pennsylvania, of the 2020 election.
Simple majority would be required, you're not impeaching someone you
never believed President.
(This is why I think the GQP allowing the nomination of the new Justice
to proceed and be confirmed a colossal mistake. They would've had a 6-2
Court in that kind of a situation -- now it's 6-3 and no GQPer thinks
Roberts is reliable.)
To paraphrase Kryten from Red Dwarf, "An excellent idea, sir, with just
two small problems."
First, that Congressional resolution still has to
be signed by Biden, and when he vetoes it, the Republicans won't have
either the 290 Representatives nor the 67 Senators, much less both,
needed to override the veto.
Second, not even Clarence Thomas is mad enough to support something like that.
If somebody wants Trump as President that badly, you make him Speaker of
the House like you suggested, then wait for Biden and Harris to make some joint appearance somewhere - Bang, Bang, President Trump. Of course, that would probably spark a second Civil War, which lasts just long enough for everybody with money to leave the country, but let's not bother ourselves with petty details.
Quoted from Russian state TV
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1508943310483767302?s=21&t=uh_VFGjFztLQlrEYkwBmww
--
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, liberal personality.” — Altie
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:52:30 PM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:weak, democratic system."
Quoted from Russian state TV
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1508943310483767302?s=21&t=uh_VFGjFztLQlrEYkwBmww
--Does it tell you something that they said this in a public forum? You think maybe this show is part of their propaganda campaign? "Dammit, those amerikaniski are actually being effective in supporting Ukraine. We must do more to sew division in their
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, liberal personality.” — Altie
It's amazing how many people really want to believe that Clinton lost because of Russia's activities. I guess they can't accept that the real reason was that she's a bad candidate who ran a lousy campaign.
Doug
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 10:08:59 AM UTC-5, Emperor Wonko the Sane wrote:weak, democratic system."
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:52:30 PM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:
Quoted from Russian state TV
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1508943310483767302?s=21&t=uh_VFGjFztLQlrEYkwBmww
--Does it tell you something that they said this in a public forum? You think maybe this show is part of their propaganda campaign? "Dammit, those amerikaniski are actually being effective in supporting Ukraine. We must do more to sew division in their
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian,
liberal personality.” — Altie
or directly involved trump himself.It's amazing how many people really want to believe that Clinton lost because of Russia's activities. I guess they can't accept that the real reason was that she's a bad candidate who ran a lousy campaign.
DougI bet a lot of the “Russia! Russia! Russia!” people also thought that Hillary Clinton ran a lousy campaign. Also I bet not everyone who felt that there were Russian activities worth investigating, felt those activities actually swung the election
To paraphrase Kryten from Red Dwarf, "An excellent idea, sir, with just two small problems."
First, that Congressional resolution still has to be signed by Biden, and when he vetoes it, the Republicans won't have either the 290 Representatives nor the 67 Senators, much less both, needed to override the veto.
Second, not even Clarence Thomas is mad enough to support something like that.
If somebody wants Trump as President that badly, you make him Speaker of the House like you suggested, then wait for Biden and Harris to make some joint appearance somewhere - Bang, Bang, President Trump. Of course, that would probably spark a secondCivil War, which lasts just long enough for everybody with money to leave the country, but let's not bother ourselves with petty details.
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 9:25:28 AM UTC-7, Johnny RSFCootball wrote:their weak, democratic system."
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 10:08:59 AM UTC-5, Emperor Wonko the Sane wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:52:30 PM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:
Quoted from Russian state TV
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1508943310483767302?s=21&t=uh_VFGjFztLQlrEYkwBmww
--Does it tell you something that they said this in a public forum? You think maybe this show is part of their propaganda campaign? "Dammit, those amerikaniski are actually being effective in supporting Ukraine. We must do more to sew division in
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian,
liberal personality.” — Altie
or directly involved trump himself.It's amazing how many people really want to believe that Clinton lost because of Russia's activities. I guess they can't accept that the real reason was that she's a bad candidate who ran a lousy campaign.
DougI bet a lot of the “Russia! Russia! Russia!” people also thought that Hillary Clinton ran a lousy campaign. Also I bet not everyone who felt that there were Russian activities worth investigating, felt those activities actually swung the election
Hillary had a 40 point lead on Obama in '08 and lost the nomination. She had a 40 point lead on Bernie and almost lost it in '16. She was quite capable of losing the election to Trump on her own.
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 12:09:49 PM UTC-5, Eric Ramon wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 9:25:28 AM UTC-7, Johnny RSFCootball wrote: >>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 10:08:59 AM UTC-5, Emperor Wonko the Sane wrote:
had a 40 point lead on Bernie and almost lost it in '16. She was quiteOn Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:52:30 PM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:I bet a lot of the Russia! Russia! Russia! people also thought that
Quoted from Russian state TVDoes it tell you something that they said this in a public forum? You
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1508943310483767302?s!&t=uh_VFGjFztLQlrEYkwBmww
--
I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, >>>>> liberal personality. Altie
think maybe this show is part of their propaganda campaign? "Dammit,
those amerikaniski are actually being effective in supporting Ukraine. >>>> We must do more to sew division in their weak, democratic system."
It's amazing how many people really want to believe that Clinton lost
because of Russia's activities. I guess they can't accept that the
real reason was that she's a bad candidate who ran a lousy campaign.
Doug
Hillary Clinton ran a lousy campaign. Also I bet not everyone who felt
that there were Russian activities worth investigating, felt those
activities actually swung the election or directly involved trump himself. >> Hillary had a 40 point lead on Obama in '08 and lost the nomination. She
capable of losing the election to Trump on her own.
I didnt disagree with that. My point was that I think there are lots of people that believed that there were Russian activities worth
investigating and also believed that Clinton wasnt a great candidate and fully capable of losing the election on her own (especially considering
our election system).
Exactly. It’s becoming harder and harder to deny what was clear back in 2016 to anyone who didn’t have motive to not know or deny it: Trump is Putin’s man and Russia did help Trump’s campaign, with collusion from that
campaign. They aren’t even bothering to try to hide it any more.
Whether or not that was a decisive factor in his win is irrelevant to what those facts mean for Trump’s suitability for office, or the light in which his actions in office should be viewed, or the gullibility, intentional or not, of those who still can’t or refuse to see it.
On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 7:32:33 AM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
Exactly. It’s becoming harder and harder to deny what was clear back in 2016 to anyone who didn’t have motive to not know or deny it: Trump is Putin’s man and Russia did help Trump’s campaign, with collusion from that
campaign. They aren’t even bothering to try to hide it any more.
Whether or not that was a decisive factor in his win is irrelevant to what those facts mean for Trump’s suitability for office, or the light in whichTrump was tougher on Russia than both Obama and Biden.
his actions in office should be viewed, or the gullibility, intentional or not, of those who still can’t or refuse to see it.
After taking office, Biden immediately began enriching Russia and their allies
while weakening the US.
-TE
"Shit is so fake that the minute an outsider took office we got cheap gas, cheap
food, became energy independent, no wars and focused on our country’s own issues. Establishment hacks get back in and we have inflation, medical tyranny,
world war 3, need to take a mortgage for gas."
Johnny RSFCootball <1jay1mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 12:09:49 PM UTC-5, Eric Ramon wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 9:25:28 AM UTC-7, Johnny RSFCootball wrote: >>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 10:08:59 AM UTC-5, Emperor Wonko the Sane wrote:
Hillary had a 40 point lead on Obama in '08 and lost the nomination. She >> had a 40 point lead on Bernie and almost lost it in '16. She was quiteOn Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:52:30 PM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:I bet a lot of the Russia! Russia! Russia! people also thought that
Quoted from Russian state TVDoes it tell you something that they said this in a public forum? You >>>> think maybe this show is part of their propaganda campaign? "Dammit, >>>> those amerikaniski are actually being effective in supporting Ukraine. >>>> We must do more to sew division in their weak, democratic system."
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1508943310483767302?s!&t=uh_VFGjFztLQlrEYkwBmww
--
I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian, >>>>> liberal personality. Altie
It's amazing how many people really want to believe that Clinton lost >>>> because of Russia's activities. I guess they can't accept that the
real reason was that she's a bad candidate who ran a lousy campaign. >>>>
Doug
Hillary Clinton ran a lousy campaign. Also I bet not everyone who felt >>> that there were Russian activities worth investigating, felt those
activities actually swung the election or directly involved trump himself.
capable of losing the election to Trump on her own.
I didn t disagree with that. My point was that I think there are lots of people that believed that there were Russian activities worth investigating and also believed that Clinton wasnt a great candidate and fully capable of losing the election on her own (especially considering our election system).Exactly. It’s becoming harder and harder to deny what was clear back in 2016 to anyone who didn’t have motive to not know or deny it: Trump is Putin’s man and Russia did help Trump’s campaign, with collusion from that
campaign. They aren’t even bothering to try to hide it any more.
Whether or not that was a decisive factor in his win is irrelevant to what those facts mean for Trump’s suitability for office, or the light in which his actions in office should be viewed, or the gullibility, intentional or not, of those who still can’t or refuse to see it.
--
Exactly. It’s becoming harder and harder to deny what was clear back in 2016 to anyone who didn’t have motive to not know or deny it: Trump is Putin’s man and Russia did help Trump’s campaign, with collusion from that
campaign. They aren’t even bothering to try to hide it any more.
Whether or not that was a decisive factor in his win is irrelevant to what those facts mean for Trump’s suitability for office, or the light in which his actions in office should be viewed, or the gullibility, intentional or not, of those who still can’t or refuse to see it.
--
On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 4:32:33 AM UTC-7, xyzzy wrote:
Exactly. It’s becoming harder and harder to deny what was clear back in 2016 to anyone who didn’t have motive to not know or deny it: Trump is Putin’s man and Russia did help Trump’s campaign, with collusion from that
campaign. They aren’t even bothering to try to hide it any more.
Whether or not that was a decisive factor in his win is irrelevant to what those facts mean for Trump’s suitability for office, or the light in which
his actions in office should be viewed, or the gullibility, intentional or not, of those who still can’t or refuse to see it.
ok, I can agree with this.
As for Trump's Presidency, I think it fell apart when he blew a gasket at the report of the size of the crowd at his inauguration.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 406 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 113:58:38 |
| Calls: | 8,529 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 13,212 |
| Messages: | 5,920,822 |