because it is saying Alabama had a 0.1% chance to win(presumably on the play before the 4th down pass for a touchdown).was 20 yards closer and just a long pass and not a hail mary.
There is *no way* that is right. The chance of alabama(or any offense) converting 4th and goal from the 30 yard line is obviously poor, but it's far higher than 1 out of 1000. Even true 50 yard hail marys have a much better chance than that, and this
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 10:28:19 PM UTC-8, michael anderson wrote:was 20 yards closer and just a long pass and not a hail mary.
because it is saying Alabama had a 0.1% chance to win(presumably on the play before the 4th down pass for a touchdown).
There is *no way* that is right. The chance of alabama(or any offense) converting 4th and goal from the 30 yard line is obviously poor, but it's far higher than 1 out of 1000. Even true 50 yard hail marys have a much better chance than that, and this
Remember, though, mia -- that's to win the game.
To do that, Alabama must:
* convert 4th and goal from the 31
* and THEN prevent Auburn from getting a quick tying score and Auburn wins in OT or a quick Auburn winning score
I think <0.1% is actually correct here.
Mike
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 403 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 96:03:24 |
Calls: | 8,445 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,181 |
Messages: | 5,907,979 |