A number of news sources are reporting that the Iowa-Louisville women's basketball Elite 8 game last Sunday (which only filled about 2/3 of the arena it was in, mind you) had 2.5 million viewers on ESPN, which is 350,000 more than any NBA game ESPN hasaired this season. Note that this is limited to ESPN games; I assume the ABC games (for example, the main ones on Christmas Day) get higher ratings, and every game in the 2022 finals had at least 10 million viewers.
Here's what they forget to mention: that 2.5 million is also about 2 million more than watched the WNBA Finals last year.MLB and the NFL say "World Series champions" and "Super Bowl champions" doesn't mean you can get away with thinking that being the "NBA Finals" champions means something other than they're the NBA champions.)
(Oh, and speaking of the NBA Finals: stop putting "NBA Finals Champions" on the merchandise. You don't have to say "World Champions" any more, like you did in the 1970s, but they're the NBA champions, not just the 'NBA Finals' champions. Just because
so this south carolina-Iowa game is going to get a big(relative for typical women's sports) number because they have hyped the hell out of this lesbian who plays for iowa......so they're hyping the game as the great white lesbian hope against thegreatest team evar....or whatever.
If 3.5 million or so people watch the game tonight, it's really amazing that *only* 3.5 million people watched it as much as the mainstream media has forced this game down our throats.down our throats so much......
I mean honestly if the mainstream media pumped two centipedes racing on the sidewalk as much as they have this game, 3-4 million people would also tune in to catch a glance at that just because they wonder what the big fuss is about it's been crammed
but I don't think a lot of this is 'real' interest.
On 3/31/2023 6:51 PM, michael anderson wrote:
uper Bowl champions" doesn't mean you can get away with thinking that
being the "NBA Finals" champions means something other than they're the
NBA champions.)
so this south carolina-Iowa game is going to get a big(relative for
typical women's sports) number because they have hyped the hell out of
this lesbian who plays for iowa......so they're hyping the game as the
great white lesbian hope against the greatest team evar....or whatever.
If 3.5 million or so people watch the game tonight, it's really amazing
that *only* 3.5 million people watched it as much as the mainstream
media has forced this game down our throats.
I mean honestly if the mainstream media pumped two centipedes racing on
the sidewalk as much as they have this game, 3-4 million people would
also tune in to catch a glance at that just because they wonder what the
big fuss is about it's been crammed down our throats so much......
but I don't think a lot of this is 'real' interest.
Well, DICKHEAD, the USC/Iowa game lived up to the hype. As did Caitlin
Clark.
Where did you get the idea that she is a lesbian? Or do you just assume
that the best women athletes are gay?
RoddyMcCorley <Roddy.M...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 3/31/2023 6:51 PM, michael anderson wrote:
uper Bowl champions" doesn't mean you can get away with thinking that being the "NBA Finals" champions means something other than they're the NBA champions.)
so this south carolina-Iowa game is going to get a big(relative for
typical women's sports) number because they have hyped the hell out of
this lesbian who plays for iowa......so they're hyping the game as the
great white lesbian hope against the greatest team evar....or whatever. >>
If 3.5 million or so people watch the game tonight, it's really amazing >> that *only* 3.5 million people watched it as much as the mainstream
media has forced this game down our throats.
I mean honestly if the mainstream media pumped two centipedes racing on >> the sidewalk as much as they have this game, 3-4 million people would
also tune in to catch a glance at that just because they wonder what the >> big fuss is about it's been crammed down our throats so much......
but I don't think a lot of this is 'real' interest.
Well, DICKHEAD, the USC/Iowa game lived up to the hype. As did Caitlin Clark.
Where did you get the idea that she is a lesbian? Or do you just assume that the best women athletes are gay?One difference between the men’s and women’s tournaments is that in the women’s, basically all the top seeds advanced. The FF was 2 1’s and a 2 and
a 3.
Maybe despite the underdog hyping, people like to see the top teams battle it out for a championship. Obviously it didn’t make women’s tournament more
popular than the men but it might have given it a boost.
RoddyMcCorley <Roddy.M...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 3/31/2023 6:51 PM, michael anderson wrote:
uper Bowl champions" doesn't mean you can get away with thinking that being the "NBA Finals" champions means something other than they're the NBA champions.)
so this south carolina-Iowa game is going to get a big(relative for
typical women's sports) number because they have hyped the hell out of
this lesbian who plays for iowa......so they're hyping the game as the
great white lesbian hope against the greatest team evar....or whatever. >>
If 3.5 million or so people watch the game tonight, it's really amazing >> that *only* 3.5 million people watched it as much as the mainstream
media has forced this game down our throats.
I mean honestly if the mainstream media pumped two centipedes racing on >> the sidewalk as much as they have this game, 3-4 million people would
also tune in to catch a glance at that just because they wonder what the >> big fuss is about it's been crammed down our throats so much......
but I don't think a lot of this is 'real' interest.
Well, DICKHEAD, the USC/Iowa game lived up to the hype. As did Caitlin Clark.
Where did you get the idea that she is a lesbian? Or do you just assume that the best women athletes are gay?One difference between the men’s and women’s tournaments is that in the women’s, basically all the top seeds advanced. The FF was 2 1’s and a 2 and
a 3.
On 3/31/2023 6:51 PM, michael anderson wrote:greatest team evar....or whatever.
uper Bowl champions" doesn't mean you can get away with thinking that
being the "NBA Finals" champions means something other than they're the
NBA champions.)
so this south carolina-Iowa game is going to get a big(relative for typical women's sports) number because they have hyped the hell out of this lesbian who plays for iowa......so they're hyping the game as the great white lesbian hope against the
down our throats so much......If 3.5 million or so people watch the game tonight, it's really amazing that *only* 3.5 million people watched it as much as the mainstream media has forced this game down our throats.
I mean honestly if the mainstream media pumped two centipedes racing on the sidewalk as much as they have this game, 3-4 million people would also tune in to catch a glance at that just because they wonder what the big fuss is about it's been crammed
but I don't think a lot of this is 'real' interest.Well, DICKHEAD, the USC/Iowa game lived up to the hype. As did Caitlin Clark.
Where did you get the idea that she is a lesbian?
Where did you get the idea that she is a lesbian? Or do you just assume
that the best women athletes are gay?
this is common in the women's vs the men's though......actually 2 #1's advancing is kind of low for the women. The games
are extremely predictable because the teams in the bottom half of the field are so bad.
On Saturday, April 1, 2023 at 7:15:57 AM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:
RoddyMcCorley <Roddy.M...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 3/31/2023 6:51 PM, michael anderson wrote:One difference between the men’s and women’s tournaments is that in the >> women’s, basically all the top seeds advanced. The FF was 2 1’s and a 2 and
uper Bowl champions" doesn't mean you can get away with thinking that
being the "NBA Finals" champions means something other than they're the
NBA champions.)
so this south carolina-Iowa game is going to get a big(relative for
typical women's sports) number because they have hyped the hell out of >>>> this lesbian who plays for iowa......so they're hyping the game as the >>>> great white lesbian hope against the greatest team evar....or whatever. >>>>
If 3.5 million or so people watch the game tonight, it's really amazing >>>> that *only* 3.5 million people watched it as much as the mainstream
media has forced this game down our throats.
I mean honestly if the mainstream media pumped two centipedes racing on >>>> the sidewalk as much as they have this game, 3-4 million people would
also tune in to catch a glance at that just because they wonder what the >>>> big fuss is about it's been crammed down our throats so much......
but I don't think a lot of this is 'real' interest.
Well, DICKHEAD, the USC/Iowa game lived up to the hype. As did Caitlin
Clark.
Where did you get the idea that she is a lesbian? Or do you just assume
that the best women athletes are gay?
a 3.
this is common in the women's vs the men's though......actually 2 #1's advancing is kind of low for the women. The games
are extremely predictable because the teams in the bottom half of the field are so bad.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 109:40:16 |
| Calls: | 6,701 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,233 |
| Messages: | 5,348,545 |