• World Cup Mundial Coupe du Monde 2026 qualifying thread [R]

    From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 4 14:11:34 2022
    This thread may seem a little premature, but AFC have announced how the Asian qualifiers for World Cup 2026 will work:

    1) Preliminary joint qualification round 1: the teams ranked 26 to 47 are paired and play each other on a home and away basis.

    In many ways this is cruelest qualifying round of all. 11 teams will have their World Cup dream ended after only two matches and whilst the timetable hasn't been decided, usually some three years before the World Cup. :(


    2) Preliminary joint qualification round 2: The 11 winners from the previous round join the teams ranked 1 to 25. The teams will be divided into nine groups of four. Teams play each other home and away. The top two teams from each group advance to the
    AFC Asian qualifiers.


    3) AFC Asian qualifiers: The 18 teams who advanced from the previous round will be divided into three groups of six. Teams play each other home and away and the top two teams from each group qualify for the 2026 World Cup!


    4) Asian Playoff: The third and fourth placed teams from the previous round will be drawn into two groups of three. Teams will play each other once. The two first placed teams will qualify for the World Cup! The second placed teams will compete in a
    playoff to determine who will represent AFC in the Intercontinental playoff!


    AFC will have 8 guaranteed places at World Cup 2026 plus the possibility of a further spot via the Intercontinental playoff.

    I know we haven't got Qatar 2022 out of the way yet, but I'm kind of excited that World Cup 2026 is (sort of) getting ready to get under way!

    Please use this thread to discuss any World Cup 2026 qualifying news and match reports. Let's honour the biggest World Cup ever with an equally big qualifying thread!


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Thu Aug 4 16:26:02 2022
    On 2022-08-04 15:11, Real Mardin wrote:
    This thread may seem a little premature, but AFC have announced how the Asian qualifiers for World Cup 2026 will work:

    1) Preliminary joint qualification round 1: the teams ranked 26 to 47 are paired and play each other on a home and away basis.

    In many ways this is cruelest qualifying round of all. 11 teams will have their World Cup dream ended after only two matches and whilst the timetable hasn't been decided, usually some three years before the World Cup. :(


    2) Preliminary joint qualification round 2: The 11 winners from the previous round join the teams ranked 1 to 25. The teams will be divided into nine groups of four. Teams play each other home and away. The top two teams from each group advance to the
    AFC Asian qualifiers.


    3) AFC Asian qualifiers: The 18 teams who advanced from the previous round will be divided into three groups of six. Teams play each other home and away and the top two teams from each group qualify for the 2026 World Cup!


    4) Asian Playoff: The third and fourth placed teams from the previous round will be drawn into two groups of three. Teams will play each other once. The two first placed teams will qualify for the World Cup! The second placed teams will compete in a
    playoff to determine who will represent AFC in the Intercontinental playoff!


    AFC will have 8 guaranteed places at World Cup 2026 plus the possibility of a further spot via the Intercontinental playoff.


    48 teams seems like too many to me, even if it does enhance the chances
    of both Canada and Scotland qualifying for the first time since 1986.
    And I hate the fact that it involves groups of 3 teams, which can't be
    a good thing (think second round of WC 1982 - except maybe worse with 2
    teams going forward - which makes the prospect of biscotti quite real.
    But the different amount of rest teams will have had is an issue).

    We should see some new teams qualify, though, which will be nice. With
    8-9 Asian teams and 9-10 African teams the likelihood is reasonably high
    I suspect. Maybe Venezuela might finally make it too, as the 7th
    CONMEBOL team. I would be a bit surprised if we get a new CONCACAF participant, with Curacao, Suriname or Guatemala perhaps the most likely first-timers.

    I know we haven't got Qatar 2022 out of the way yet, but I'm kind of excited that World Cup 2026 is (sort of) getting ready to get under way!

    Please use this thread to discuss any World Cup 2026 qualifying news and match reports. Let's honour the biggest World Cup ever with an equally big qualifying thread!


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Fri Aug 5 03:04:50 2022
    On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 10:11:36 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    This thread may seem a little premature, but AFC have announced how the Asian qualifiers for World Cup 2026 will work:

    1) Preliminary joint qualification round 1: the teams ranked 26 to 47 are paired and play each other on a home and away basis.

    In many ways this is cruelest qualifying round of all. 11 teams will have their World Cup dream ended after only two matches and whilst the timetable hasn't been decided, usually some three years before the World Cup. :(

    I agree.


    2) Preliminary joint qualification round 2: The 11 winners from the previous round join the teams ranked 1 to 25. The teams will be divided into nine groups of four. Teams play each other home and away. The top two teams from each group advance to the
    AFC Asian qualifiers.


    3) AFC Asian qualifiers: The 18 teams who advanced from the previous round will be divided into three groups of six. Teams play each other home and away and the top two teams from each group qualify for the 2026 World Cup!


    4) Asian Playoff: The third and fourth placed teams from the previous round will be drawn into two groups of three. Teams will play each other once. The two first placed teams will qualify for the World Cup! The second placed teams will compete in a
    playoff to determine who will represent AFC in the Intercontinental playoff!

    A bit unsure about this, as having home advantage is unfair, and playing the matches at a neutral venue would, to say the least, be unfair on the fans.

    Overall though, it certainly sounds better than what we've had up to now with the "best" 3rd place teams going through etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ammammata@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 6 09:18:12 2022
    Il giorno Thu 04 Aug 2022 11:11:34p, *Real Mardin* ha inviato su rec.sport.soccer il messaggio news:041ff2de-ab71-47b7-8b94-ec50f960ed2fn@googlegroups.com. Vediamo
    cosa ha scritto:

    1) Preliminary joint qualification round 1: the teams ranked 26 to
    47 are paired and play each other on a home and away basis.


    why only 47?

    according to http://www.eloratings.net/Asia there are at least 58 teams
    in Asia: maybe not all of them are considered WC teams, i.e. Tibet or
    Chagos Islands

    Who is missing?

    --
    /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\
    -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=-
    ........... [ al lavoro ] ...........

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 7 09:05:43 2022
    On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 11:26:06 PM UTC+1, MH wrote:
    On 2022-08-04 15:11, Real Mardin wrote:
    This thread may seem a little premature, but AFC have announced how the Asian qualifiers for World Cup 2026 will work:

    1) Preliminary joint qualification round 1: the teams ranked 26 to 47 are paired and play each other on a home and away basis.

    In many ways this is cruelest qualifying round of all. 11 teams will have their World Cup dream ended after only two matches and whilst the timetable hasn't been decided, usually some three years before the World Cup. :(


    2) Preliminary joint qualification round 2: The 11 winners from the previous round join the teams ranked 1 to 25. The teams will be divided into nine groups of four. Teams play each other home and away. The top two teams from each group advance to
    the AFC Asian qualifiers.


    3) AFC Asian qualifiers: The 18 teams who advanced from the previous round will be divided into three groups of six. Teams play each other home and away and the top two teams from each group qualify for the 2026 World Cup!


    4) Asian Playoff: The third and fourth placed teams from the previous round will be drawn into two groups of three. Teams will play each other once. The two first placed teams will qualify for the World Cup! The second placed teams will compete in a
    playoff to determine who will represent AFC in the Intercontinental playoff!


    AFC will have 8 guaranteed places at World Cup 2026 plus the possibility of a further spot via the Intercontinental playoff.
    48 teams seems like too many to me, even if it does enhance the chances
    of both Canada and Scotland qualifying for the first time since 1986.

    To be honest when they announced in 2018 that Canada would host one of my earliest thoughts was that Canada v Scotland in Canada could be quite an occasion.

    And I hate the fact that it involves groups of 3 teams, which can't be
    a good thing (think second round of WC 1982 - except maybe worse with 2 teams going forward - which makes the prospect of biscotti quite real.
    But the different amount of rest teams will have had is an issue).

    Yeah, be interesting to do a simulation of the tournament sometime and see how many "biscotti" type situations might typically come up. Also, as good as it is that more teams will get to go to the World Cup it's a shame that for many the tournament will
    be over after just two games, at least under old format teams were guaranteed three matches before having to board the plane home.



    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Ammammata on Sun Aug 7 10:19:19 2022
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 10:18:15 AM UTC+1, Ammammata wrote:
    Il giorno Thu 04 Aug 2022 11:11:34p, *Real Mardin* ha inviato su rec.sport.soccer il messaggio
    news:041ff2de-ab71-47b7...@googlegroups.com. Vediamo
    cosa ha scritto:
    1) Preliminary joint qualification round 1: the teams ranked 26 to
    47 are paired and play each other on a home and away basis.

    why only 47?

    according to http://www.eloratings.net/Asia there are at least 58 teams
    in Asia: maybe not all of them are considered WC teams, i.e. Tibet or
    Chagos Islands

    Who is missing?

    Personally I'll confess to having a superficial knowledge of AFC but the official website refers to there being 47 members and the wikipedia entry lists the following as being AFC members:

    (Please forgive the formatting and unnecessary info but it was quicker to cut and paste the following from Wikipedia):

    Code Name Founded FIFA
    affiliation AFC
    affiliation IOC
    member
    ASEAN Football Federation (AFF) (12)
    AUS Australia[m 1] 1961 1963 2006 Yes[m 2]
    BRU Brunei Darussalam 1952 1972 1969 Yes
    CAM Cambodia 1933 1954 1954 Yes
    IDN Indonesia 1930 1952 1954 Yes
    LAO Laos 1951 1952 1968 Yes
    MAS Malaysia 1933 1954 1954 Yes
    MYA Myanmar 1947 1948 1954 Yes
    PHI Philippines 1907 1930 1954 Yes
    SIN Singapore 1892 1952 1954 Yes
    THA Thailand 1916 1925 1954 Yes
    TLS Timor-Leste 2002 2005 2002 Yes
    VIE Vietnam 1960 1952 1954 Yes
    Central Asian Football Association (CAFA) (6)
    AFG Afghanistan 1933 1948 1954 Yes
    IRN Islamic Republic of Iran 1920 1948 1954 Yes
    KGZ Kyrgyz Republic 1992 1994 1993 Yes
    TJK Tajikistan 1936 1994 1993 Yes
    TKM Turkmenistan 1992 1994 1993 Yes
    UZB Uzbekistan 1946 1994 1993 Yes
    East Asian Football Federation (EAFF) (10)
    CHN China 1924 1931 1974 Yes
    TPE Chinese Taipei[m 3] 1936 1954 1954 Yes
    PRK DPR Korea 1945 1958 1974 Yes
    GUM Guam 1975 1996 1991 Yes[m 2]
    HKG Hong Kong 1914 1954 1954 Yes
    JPN Japan 1921 1921 1954 Yes
    KOR Korea Republic 1928 1948 1954 Yes
    MAC Macau 1939 1978 1978 No[m 4]
    MNG Mongolia 1959 1998 1993 Yes
    NMI Northern Mariana Islands 2005 N/A 2020 No[m 5]
    South Asian Football Federation (SAFF) (7)
    BAN Bangladesh 1972 1976 1974 Yes
    BHU Bhutan 1983 2000 1993 Yes
    IND India 1937 1948 1954 Yes
    MDV Maldives 1982 1986 1984 Yes
    NEP Nepal 1951 1972 1954 Yes
    PAK Pakistan 1947 1948 1954 Yes
    SRI Sri Lanka 1939 1952 1954 Yes
    West Asian Football Federation (WAFF) (12)
    BHR Bahrain 1957 1968 1969 Yes
    IRQ Iraq 1948 1950 1970 Yes
    JOR Jordan 1949 1956 1970 Yes
    KUW Kuwait 1952 1964 1964 Yes
    LBN Lebanon 1933 1936 1964 Yes
    OMA Oman 1978 1980 1980 Yes
    PLE Palestine 1928 1998 1998 Yes
    QAT Qatar 1960 1972 1974 Yes
    KSA Saudi Arabia 1956 1956 1972 Yes
    SYR Syria 1936 1937 1970 Yes
    UAE United Arab Emirates 1971 1974 1974 Yes
    YEM Yemen 1962


    So that makes 47 members. I can only assume there are some nations who whilst being geographically in Asia aren't signed up as full AFC members,

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Werner Pichler@21:1/5 to Ammammata on Sun Aug 7 11:24:30 2022
    On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 11:18:15 AM UTC+2, Ammammata wrote:
    Il giorno Thu 04 Aug 2022 11:11:34p, *Real Mardin* ha inviato su rec.sport.soccer il messaggio
    news:041ff2de-ab71-47b7...@googlegroups.com. Vediamo
    cosa ha scritto:
    1) Preliminary joint qualification round 1: the teams ranked 26 to
    47 are paired and play each other on a home and away basis.

    why only 47?

    according to http://www.eloratings.net/Asia there are at least 58 teams
    in Asia: maybe not all of them are considered WC teams, i.e. Tibet or
    Chagos Islands

    Who is missing?

    Scroll up and you'll see that eloratings goes by geography and has a number of UEFA members (Georgia, Israel, Armenia,...) as well as Turkey and Russia listed as Asian.


    Ciao,
    Werner



    --
    /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\
    -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=-
    ........... [ al lavoro ] ...........

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 19 14:08:49 2022
    CONMEBOL previously confirmed that it will keep the 10 team league format for the World Cup 2026 qualifiers, with each team playing each other home and away. Ecuador will start with a 3 point penalty as a punishment for falsifying birth documents for
    Byron Castillo in the 2022 World Cup qualifiers.

    The top 6 teams qualify for World Cup 2026, with the 7th placed team getting a second chance to qualify via the inter confederation play offs.

    The CONMEBOL World Cup 2026 qualifying campaign (apparently) starts in March 2023, which seems quite soon given the 2022 World Cup only finished yesterday!

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sheridan Elliot@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Mon Dec 19 18:29:40 2022
    On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 10:11:36 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    This thread may seem a little premature, but AFC have announced how the Asian qualifiers for World Cup 2026 will work:

    1) Preliminary joint qualification round 1: the teams ranked 26 to 47 are paired and play each other on a home and away basis.

    In many ways this is cruelest qualifying round of all. 11 teams will have their World Cup dream ended after only two matches and whilst the timetable hasn't been decided, usually some three years before the World Cup. :(


    2) Preliminary joint qualification round 2: The 11 winners from the previous round join the teams ranked 1 to 25. The teams will be divided into nine groups of four. Teams play each other home and away. The top two teams from each group advance to the
    AFC Asian qualifiers.


    3) AFC Asian qualifiers: The 18 teams who advanced from the previous round will be divided into three groups of six. Teams play each other home and away and the top two teams from each group qualify for the 2026 World Cup!


    4) Asian Playoff: The third and fourth placed teams from the previous round will be drawn into two groups of three. Teams will play each other once. The two first placed teams will qualify for the World Cup! The second placed teams will compete in a
    playoff to determine who will represent AFC in the Intercontinental playoff!


    AFC will have 8 guaranteed places at World Cup 2026 plus the possibility of a further spot via the Intercontinental playoff.

    I know we haven't got Qatar 2022 out of the way yet, but I'm kind of excited that World Cup 2026 is (sort of) getting ready to get under way!

    Please use this thread to discuss any World Cup 2026 qualifying news and match reports. Let's honour the biggest World Cup ever with an equally big qualifying thread!


    RM

    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the chance of three-way ties.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 19 20:09:18 2022
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 19:08:54 UTC-3, Real Mardin escreveu:
    CONMEBOL previously confirmed that it will keep the 10 team league format
    for the World Cup 2026 qualifiers, with each team playing each other home
    and away. Ecuador will start with a 3 point penalty as a punishment for falsifying birth documents for Byron Castillo in the 2022 World Cup qualifiers.

    The top 6 teams qualify for World Cup 2026, with the 7th placed team getting a second chance to qualify via the inter confederation play offs.

    The CONMEBOL World Cup 2026 qualifying campaign (apparently) starts in March 2023, which seems quite soon given the 2022 World Cup only finished yesterday!


    So basically they're playing 90 games over two years and a half just to eliminate three teams. Can't say I expect much rockingness from this cycle.

    With two groups you could do the same with 40 games (20 per group). Sure,
    you'd have the 4th placed team of a group of five going to a playoff, but having the 7th out of 10 doing the same is hardly a lot better.

    At least it appears they've been in contact with Concacaf to hold another
    joint Copa America in 2024, to be held in the US. Hopefully they'll actually pull it off. The fact that it's more competitive games for the 2026 World
    Cup hosts probably helps matters in this regard.


    Best regards,

    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 19 20:17:58 2022
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously have
    to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the chance of three-way ties.


    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of
    the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider first round records too (though, however improbable, it could happen that even these wouldn't be enough to break a tie).


    Best regards,

    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Werner Pichler@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 20 00:19:52 2022
    On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:17:59 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the chance of three-way ties.
    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider
    first round records too

    I must have mentally skipped this part of your message. Sorry that I just repeated
    what you already wrote.

    (though, however improbable, it could happen that even these wouldn't be enough to break a tie).

    Not so improbable though, as the England example shows.

    Ciao,
    Werner

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Werner Pichler@21:1/5 to you should have on Tue Dec 20 00:17:10 2022
    On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:17:59 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the chance of three-way ties.
    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider
    first round records too (though, however improbable, it could happen that even
    these wouldn't be enough to break a tie).


    Wikipedia says the tie-breakers in the 2nd round group stage were

    - Greater number of points in all group matches
    - Goal difference in all group matches
    - Greater number of goals scored in all group matches
    - Whether the team finished first or second in their first round group (!)
    - Drawing of lots

    and this NY Times article from 1982 backs this up:

    https://www.upi.com/Archives/1982/07/03/FIFA-soccers-world-governing-body-Saturday-turned-down-a/4345394516800/

    Didn't know about this, but England obviously complained about drawing of the lots
    (calling it 'stupid') even before their match against Spain, arguing that in case of a perfect
    tie (which would have been the case if they had beaten Spain 2-1; in reality, the match
    ended 0-0) they should be ahead of West Germany due to their better first round group
    stage record (not to speak of how W. Germany qualified), and FIFA said no, you've known
    about the regulations for four years, you should have said something earlier.

    Ciao,
    Werner



    Best regards,

    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Werner Pichler on Tue Dec 20 23:30:55 2022
    Werner Pichler wrote:

    Didn't know about this, but England obviously complained about
    drawing of the lots (calling it 'stupid') even before their match
    against Spain, arguing that in case of a perfect tie (which would
    have been the case if they had beaten Spain 2-1; in reality, the
    match ended 0-0) they should be ahead of West Germany due to their
    better first round group stage record (not to speak of how W. Germany qualified), and FIFA said no, you've known about the regulations for
    four years, you should have said something earlier.

    England knew about the World Cup being in Qatar since 2010, but the FA
    still took twelve years to come up with the rainbow arm-band 'protest'
    ... which they then bottled out of! Why didn't they do something about
    that earlier too?! ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Sheridan Elliot on Tue Dec 20 23:30:55 2022
    Sheridan Elliot wrote:

    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026,

    I don't think they will. Once Uncle Gianni said they were going to look
    again at this idea you just 'know' that they have decided against it...
    but it will take a few FIFA committees and FIFA delegates taking trips
    around the world on an expenses package to actually produce the report
    that officially states that FIFA are going to stick with four-team
    groups at the next World Cup.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 20 20:53:49 2022
    Em terça-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2022 às 05:19:53 UTC-3, Werner Pichler escreveu:
    On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:17:59 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously
    have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the chance of three-way ties.

    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider
    first round records too

    I must have mentally skipped this part of your message. Sorry that I just repeated what you already wrote.


    I was actually just wondering about that possibility, I didn't know that for
    a fact. So I indeed learned something from your information.


    (though, however improbable, it could happen that even these wouldn't be enough to break a tie).

    Not so improbable though, as the England example shows.


    Yes, it was close enough. And about the English complaints, while I agree with their gist, they should indeed have raised them a lot earlier. I mean, FIFA was never going to change the rules that deep into the tournament.


    Best regards,

    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 25 08:56:16 2023
    On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 4:53:51 AM UTC, Lléo wrote:
    Em terça-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2022 às 05:19:53 UTC-3, Werner Pichler escreveu:
    On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:17:59 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the chance of three-way ties.

    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of
    the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they
    have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider
    first round records too

    I must have mentally skipped this part of your message. Sorry that I just repeated what you already wrote.
    I was actually just wondering about that possibility, I didn't know that for a fact. So I indeed learned something from your information.
    (though, however improbable, it could happen that even these wouldn't be enough to break a tie).

    Not so improbable though, as the England example shows.
    Yes, it was close enough. And about the English complaints, while I agree with
    their gist, they should indeed have raised them a lot earlier. I mean, FIFA was never going to change the rules that deep into the tournament.


    Best regards,

    Lléo



    STOP PRESS

    UEFA announce change to qualifying format to be implemented as of the World Cup 2026 qualifiers.

    The qualifying process will now be 12 groups, some of four teams, some of five.

    The first placed teams in each group qualify for the World Cup, with the runners up going into a qualification playoff.

    Further details and commentary to follow.


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Sun Jan 29 14:55:19 2023
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 4:56:18 PM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 4:53:51 AM UTC, Lléo wrote:
    Em terça-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2022 às 05:19:53 UTC-3, Werner Pichler escreveu:
    On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:17:59 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the
    chance of three-way ties.

    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of
    the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they
    have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider
    first round records too

    I must have mentally skipped this part of your message. Sorry that I just
    repeated what you already wrote.
    I was actually just wondering about that possibility, I didn't know that for
    a fact. So I indeed learned something from your information.
    (though, however improbable, it could happen that even these wouldn't be
    enough to break a tie).

    Not so improbable though, as the England example shows.
    Yes, it was close enough. And about the English complaints, while I agree with
    their gist, they should indeed have raised them a lot earlier. I mean, FIFA
    was never going to change the rules that deep into the tournament.


    Best regards,

    Lléo
    STOP PRESS

    UEFA announce change to qualifying format to be implemented as of the World Cup 2026 qualifiers.

    The qualifying process will now be 12 groups, some of four teams, some of five.

    The first placed teams in each group qualify for the World Cup, with the runners up going into a qualification playoff.

    Further details and commentary to follow.


    RM

    It had been announced in advance that UEFA would be changing it's qualifying format post Euro 2024. Thoughts turned to possibilities such as turning the system into a league or of integrating the European Championship or Nations League into the
    qualifying process, perhaps by having the top four ranked teams in the Euros qualify for the World Cup.

    Instead, what was announced was quite underwhelming. Not a change of format at all really, more of a tinkering. Still a system that has the European Championship and the World Cup qualifiers existing in isolation. Still a group based qualification system,
    only there will be more, smaller groups.

    The media release which announced the change claims that smaller groups are more dynamic and less predictable than larger groups. I looked back at some qualifying group results when UEFA used to have four team groups in the 80's and early 90's, and yes,
    there were some groups where the top two or even three spots were close. But then you get the same with 6 team groups. Plus even the most competitive four team groups don't solve the problem of the minnow who finishes so far behind the rest that matches
    against them are essentially meaningless.

    It feels like this was a missed opportunity to reform the UEFA qualifiers.

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Tue Feb 28 16:16:08 2023
    On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:55:20 PM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 4:56:18 PM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 4:53:51 AM UTC, Lléo wrote:
    Em terça-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2022 às 05:19:53 UTC-3, Werner Pichler escreveu:
    On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:17:59 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously
    have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the
    chance of three-way ties.

    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of
    the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they
    have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider
    first round records too

    I must have mentally skipped this part of your message. Sorry that I just
    repeated what you already wrote.
    I was actually just wondering about that possibility, I didn't know that for
    a fact. So I indeed learned something from your information.
    (though, however improbable, it could happen that even these wouldn't be
    enough to break a tie).

    Not so improbable though, as the England example shows.
    Yes, it was close enough. And about the English complaints, while I agree with
    their gist, they should indeed have raised them a lot earlier. I mean, FIFA
    was never going to change the rules that deep into the tournament.


    Best regards,

    Lléo
    STOP PRESS

    UEFA announce change to qualifying format to be implemented as of the World Cup 2026 qualifiers.

    The qualifying process will now be 12 groups, some of four teams, some of five.

    The first placed teams in each group qualify for the World Cup, with the runners up going into a qualification playoff.

    Further details and commentary to follow.


    RM
    It had been announced in advance that UEFA would be changing it's qualifying format post Euro 2024. Thoughts turned to possibilities such as turning the system into a league or of integrating the European Championship or Nations League into the
    qualifying process, perhaps by having the top four ranked teams in the Euros qualify for the World Cup.

    Instead, what was announced was quite underwhelming. Not a change of format at all really, more of a tinkering. Still a system that has the European Championship and the World Cup qualifiers existing in isolation. Still a group based qualification
    system, only there will be more, smaller groups.

    The media release which announced the change claims that smaller groups are more dynamic and less predictable than larger groups. I looked back at some qualifying group results when UEFA used to have four team groups in the 80's and early 90's, and yes,
    there were some groups where the top two or even three spots were close. But then you get the same with 6 team groups. Plus even the most competitive four team groups don't solve the problem of the minnow who finishes so far behind the rest that matches
    against them are essentially meaningless.

    It feels like this was a missed opportunity to reform the UEFA qualifiers.

    RM

    CONCACAF have announced their qualifying format:

    Round 1: Teams ranked 32 to 29 are drawn into pairs and play over two legs home and away.

    Round 2: The two winners from round 1 and the teams ranked 1 to 28 are drawn into six groups of five and play the other teams in their group once. Group winners and runners up qualify for the third round.

    Round 3: The 12 qualifying teams are drawn into three groups of four and play the other teams in their group home and away. Group winners qualify for World Cup 2026, the two best runners up go to the Intercontinental playoffs.

    Canada, Mexico and the USA qualify automatically as hosts. Matches start in March 2024.


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Wed Mar 1 00:02:54 2023
    On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 12:16:10 AM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:55:20 PM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 4:56:18 PM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 4:53:51 AM UTC, Lléo wrote:
    Em terça-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2022 às 05:19:53 UTC-3, Werner Pichler escreveu:
    On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:17:59 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously
    have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the
    chance of three-way ties.

    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of
    the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they
    have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider
    first round records too

    I must have mentally skipped this part of your message. Sorry that I just
    repeated what you already wrote.
    I was actually just wondering about that possibility, I didn't know that for
    a fact. So I indeed learned something from your information.
    (though, however improbable, it could happen that even these wouldn't be
    enough to break a tie).

    Not so improbable though, as the England example shows.
    Yes, it was close enough. And about the English complaints, while I agree with
    their gist, they should indeed have raised them a lot earlier. I mean, FIFA
    was never going to change the rules that deep into the tournament.


    Best regards,

    Lléo
    STOP PRESS

    UEFA announce change to qualifying format to be implemented as of the World Cup 2026 qualifiers.

    The qualifying process will now be 12 groups, some of four teams, some of five.

    The first placed teams in each group qualify for the World Cup, with the runners up going into a qualification playoff.

    Further details and commentary to follow.


    RM
    It had been announced in advance that UEFA would be changing it's qualifying format post Euro 2024. Thoughts turned to possibilities such as turning the system into a league or of integrating the European Championship or Nations League into the
    qualifying process, perhaps by having the top four ranked teams in the Euros qualify for the World Cup.

    Instead, what was announced was quite underwhelming. Not a change of format at all really, more of a tinkering. Still a system that has the European Championship and the World Cup qualifiers existing in isolation. Still a group based qualification
    system, only there will be more, smaller groups.

    The media release which announced the change claims that smaller groups are more dynamic and less predictable than larger groups. I looked back at some qualifying group results when UEFA used to have four team groups in the 80's and early 90's, and
    yes, there were some groups where the top two or even three spots were close. But then you get the same with 6 team groups. Plus even the most competitive four team groups don't solve the problem of the minnow who finishes so far behind the rest that
    matches against them are essentially meaningless.

    It feels like this was a missed opportunity to reform the UEFA qualifiers.

    RM
    CONCACAF have announced their qualifying format:

    Round 1: Teams ranked 32 to 29 are drawn into pairs and play over two legs home and away.

    So the World Cup is over for 2 teams after just 2 matches!

    Round 2: The two winners from round 1 and the teams ranked 1 to 28 are drawn into six groups of five and play the other teams in their group once. Group winners and runners up qualify for the third round.

    Why do they only play each other once? Doesn't home advantage have an effect here?

    Round 3: The 12 qualifying teams are drawn into three groups of four and play the other teams in their group home and away. Group winners qualify for World Cup 2026, the two best runners up go to the Intercontinental playoffs.

    The 2 "best" runners-up!

    Canada, Mexico and the USA qualify automatically as hosts. Matches start in March 2024.


    So is it 3 that qualify and 2 that go to the Intercontinental play-offs? Surely there's a better way than this? 8 groups of 4 or 4 groups of 8 in the 1st round would be the best way wouldn't it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Mark on Thu Mar 2 15:07:35 2023
    On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 8:02:56 AM UTC, Mark wrote:
    On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 12:16:10 AM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:55:20 PM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 4:56:18 PM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 4:53:51 AM UTC, Lléo wrote:
    Em terça-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2022 às 05:19:53 UTC-3, Werner Pichler escreveu:
    On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:17:59 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously
    have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the
    chance of three-way ties.

    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of
    the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they
    have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider
    first round records too

    I must have mentally skipped this part of your message. Sorry that I just
    repeated what you already wrote.
    I was actually just wondering about that possibility, I didn't know that for
    a fact. So I indeed learned something from your information.
    (though, however improbable, it could happen that even these wouldn't be
    enough to break a tie).

    Not so improbable though, as the England example shows.
    Yes, it was close enough. And about the English complaints, while I agree with
    their gist, they should indeed have raised them a lot earlier. I mean, FIFA
    was never going to change the rules that deep into the tournament.


    Best regards,

    Lléo
    STOP PRESS

    UEFA announce change to qualifying format to be implemented as of the World Cup 2026 qualifiers.

    The qualifying process will now be 12 groups, some of four teams, some of five.

    The first placed teams in each group qualify for the World Cup, with the runners up going into a qualification playoff.

    Further details and commentary to follow.


    RM
    It had been announced in advance that UEFA would be changing it's qualifying format post Euro 2024. Thoughts turned to possibilities such as turning the system into a league or of integrating the European Championship or Nations League into the
    qualifying process, perhaps by having the top four ranked teams in the Euros qualify for the World Cup.

    Instead, what was announced was quite underwhelming. Not a change of format at all really, more of a tinkering. Still a system that has the European Championship and the World Cup qualifiers existing in isolation. Still a group based qualification
    system, only there will be more, smaller groups.

    The media release which announced the change claims that smaller groups are more dynamic and less predictable than larger groups. I looked back at some qualifying group results when UEFA used to have four team groups in the 80's and early 90's, and
    yes, there were some groups where the top two or even three spots were close. But then you get the same with 6 team groups. Plus even the most competitive four team groups don't solve the problem of the minnow who finishes so far behind the rest that
    matches against them are essentially meaningless.

    It feels like this was a missed opportunity to reform the UEFA qualifiers.

    RM
    CONCACAF have announced their qualifying format:

    Round 1: Teams ranked 32 to 29 are drawn into pairs and play over two legs home and away.
    So the World Cup is over for 2 teams after just 2 matches!

    Yes, same as in the first round of AFC qualifying. In some ways that is the cruelest round of all, with 11 teams seeing their World Cup dream end after just two matches and some two and a half years before the tournament.


    RM



    Round 2: The two winners from round 1 and the teams ranked 1 to 28 are drawn into six groups of five and play the other teams in their group once. Group winners and runners up qualify for the third round.
    Why do they only play each other once? Doesn't home advantage have an effect here?

    Round 3: The 12 qualifying teams are drawn into three groups of four and play the other teams in their group home and away. Group winners qualify for World Cup 2026, the two best runners up go to the Intercontinental playoffs.
    The 2 "best" runners-up!

    Canada, Mexico and the USA qualify automatically as hosts. Matches start in March 2024.

    So is it 3 that qualify and 2 that go to the Intercontinental play-offs? Surely there's a better way than this? 8 groups of 4 or 4 groups of 8 in the 1st round would be the best way wouldn't it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 29 09:07:58 2023
    CONMEBOL are the first confederation to confirm their fixtures for the World Cup 2026 qualifiers.

    There are 18 rounds of games with each team playing each other home and away in a league format.

    Matchday 1

    September 2023

    Uruguay v Chile

    Colombia v Venezuela

    Brazil v Bolivia

    Paraguay v Peru

    Argentina v Ecuador


    Matchday 2

    September 2023

    Peru v Brazil

    Venezuela v Paraguay

    Bolivia v Argentina

    Chile v Colombia

    Ecuador v Uruguay


    Matchday 3

    October 2023

    Colombia v Uruguay

    Brazil v Venezuela

    Bolivia v Ecuador

    Argentina v Paraguay

    Chile v Peru


    Matchday 4

    October 2023

    Uruguay v Brazil

    Peru v Argentina

    Venezuela v Chile

    Paraguay v Bolivia

    Ecuador v Colombia


    Full fixtures:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_FIFA_World_Cup_qualification_(CONMEBOL)


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 14:36:40 2023
    Today CAF announced it's qualifying format for World Cup 2026.

    There had been speculation that CAF would change to a system that integrated the Africa Cup of Nations into the qualifying process. Whilst the format has changed, it hasn't changed in as innovative way as that.

    Instead, the 54 CAF sides will be drawn into 9 groups of 6. Teams in each group will play each other on a round robin basis. The top team in each group qualifies for the World Cup. The best four second placed teams will enter into a Continental play-off
    to determine one winner who will then proceed to the intercontinental playoff.

    Schedule:

    Draw: July 12 2023

    Match Day 1 and 2: 13-21 November 2023

    Match Day 3 and 4: June 2024

    Match Day 5: 6-14 October 2024

    Continental Playoff: 10-18 November 2025


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Fri May 19 17:23:57 2023
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 10:36:42 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Today CAF announced it's qualifying format for World Cup 2026.

    There had been speculation that CAF would change to a system that integrated the Africa Cup of Nations into the qualifying process. Whilst the format has changed, it hasn't changed in as innovative way as that.

    Instead, the 54 CAF sides will be drawn into 9 groups of 6. Teams in each group will play each other on a round robin basis. The top team in each group qualifies for the World Cup. The best four second placed teams will enter into a Continental play-
    off to determine one winner who will then proceed to the intercontinental playoff.

    Schedule:

    Draw: July 12 2023

    Match Day 1 and 2: 13-21 November 2023

    Match Day 3 and 4: June 2024

    Match Day 5: 6-14 October 2024

    Continental Playoff: 10-18 November 2025


    RM

    Having reflected on this, at least it improves on the situation where the 14 losers in the first round see their World Cup dream end after only two games. However, it does create a risk that some top African sides could find themselves eliminated if they
    have a bit of an off year (eg, finish second but not as one of the four best African teams.


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Sat May 20 02:42:07 2023
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:23:59 AM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 10:36:42 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Today CAF announced it's qualifying format for World Cup 2026.

    There had been speculation that CAF would change to a system that integrated the Africa Cup of Nations into the qualifying process. Whilst the format has changed, it hasn't changed in as innovative way as that.

    Instead, the 54 CAF sides will be drawn into 9 groups of 6. Teams in each group will play each other on a round robin basis. The top team in each group qualifies for the World Cup. The best four second placed teams will enter into a Continental play-
    off to determine one winner who will then proceed to the intercontinental playoff.


    Why the best 4 2nd place teams? If they're not going to include the 5th to 9th "best" 2nd place teams, they might as well just have the "best" one going straight into the intercontinental play-off mightn't they?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Mark on Sat May 20 06:39:17 2023
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 10:42:09 AM UTC+1, Mark wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:23:59 AM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 10:36:42 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Today CAF announced it's qualifying format for World Cup 2026.

    There had been speculation that CAF would change to a system that integrated the Africa Cup of Nations into the qualifying process. Whilst the format has changed, it hasn't changed in as innovative way as that.

    Instead, the 54 CAF sides will be drawn into 9 groups of 6. Teams in each group will play each other on a round robin basis. The top team in each group qualifies for the World Cup. The best four second placed teams will enter into a Continental
    play-off to determine one winner who will then proceed to the intercontinental playoff.

    Why the best 4 2nd place teams? If they're not going to include the 5th to 9th "best" 2nd place teams, they might as well just have the "best" one going straight into the intercontinental play-off mightn't they?


    You, Sir, should be running a football confederation!


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Sun May 21 01:33:33 2023
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:19 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 10:42:09 AM UTC+1, Mark wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:23:59 AM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 10:36:42 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Today CAF announced it's qualifying format for World Cup 2026.

    There had been speculation that CAF would change to a system that integrated the Africa Cup of Nations into the qualifying process. Whilst the format has changed, it hasn't changed in as innovative way as that.

    Instead, the 54 CAF sides will be drawn into 9 groups of 6. Teams in each group will play each other on a round robin basis. The top team in each group qualifies for the World Cup. The best four second placed teams will enter into a Continental
    play-off to determine one winner who will then proceed to the intercontinental playoff.

    Why the best 4 2nd place teams? If they're not going to include the 5th to 9th "best" 2nd place teams, they might as well just have the "best" one going straight into the intercontinental play-off mightn't they?
    You, Sir, should be running a football confederation!


    RM

    If there's any jobs going, I'm interested. How would I get a job working for CAF or CONMEBOL or UEFA or whoever?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Mark on Sun May 21 09:40:33 2023
    On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 9:33:34 AM UTC+1, Mark wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:19 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 10:42:09 AM UTC+1, Mark wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:23:59 AM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 10:36:42 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Today CAF announced it's qualifying format for World Cup 2026.

    There had been speculation that CAF would change to a system that integrated the Africa Cup of Nations into the qualifying process. Whilst the format has changed, it hasn't changed in as innovative way as that.

    Instead, the 54 CAF sides will be drawn into 9 groups of 6. Teams in each group will play each other on a round robin basis. The top team in each group qualifies for the World Cup. The best four second placed teams will enter into a Continental
    play-off to determine one winner who will then proceed to the intercontinental playoff.

    Why the best 4 2nd place teams? If they're not going to include the 5th to 9th "best" 2nd place teams, they might as well just have the "best" one going straight into the intercontinental play-off mightn't they?
    You, Sir, should be running a football confederation!


    RM
    If there's any jobs going, I'm interested. How would I get a job working for CAF or CONMEBOL or UEFA or whoever?

    https://www.concacaf.com/inside-concacaf/careers/

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Mon May 22 02:32:52 2023
    On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 5:40:35 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 9:33:34 AM UTC+1, Mark wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:19 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 10:42:09 AM UTC+1, Mark wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:23:59 AM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 10:36:42 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Today CAF announced it's qualifying format for World Cup 2026.

    There had been speculation that CAF would change to a system that integrated the Africa Cup of Nations into the qualifying process. Whilst the format has changed, it hasn't changed in as innovative way as that.

    Instead, the 54 CAF sides will be drawn into 9 groups of 6. Teams in each group will play each other on a round robin basis. The top team in each group qualifies for the World Cup. The best four second placed teams will enter into a
    Continental play-off to determine one winner who will then proceed to the intercontinental playoff.

    Why the best 4 2nd place teams? If they're not going to include the 5th to 9th "best" 2nd place teams, they might as well just have the "best" one going straight into the intercontinental play-off mightn't they?
    You, Sir, should be running a football confederation!


    RM
    If there's any jobs going, I'm interested. How would I get a job working for CAF or CONMEBOL or UEFA or whoever?
    https://www.concacaf.com/inside-concacaf/careers/

    RM

    Would it be Event coordinator that I'd want to go for?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Mark on Mon May 22 10:41:13 2023
    On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 10:32:54 AM UTC+1, Mark wrote:
    On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 5:40:35 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 9:33:34 AM UTC+1, Mark wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 2:39:19 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 10:42:09 AM UTC+1, Mark wrote:
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:23:59 AM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 10:36:42 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Today CAF announced it's qualifying format for World Cup 2026.

    There had been speculation that CAF would change to a system that integrated the Africa Cup of Nations into the qualifying process. Whilst the format has changed, it hasn't changed in as innovative way as that.

    Instead, the 54 CAF sides will be drawn into 9 groups of 6. Teams in each group will play each other on a round robin basis. The top team in each group qualifies for the World Cup. The best four second placed teams will enter into a
    Continental play-off to determine one winner who will then proceed to the intercontinental playoff.

    Why the best 4 2nd place teams? If they're not going to include the 5th to 9th "best" 2nd place teams, they might as well just have the "best" one going straight into the intercontinental play-off mightn't they?
    You, Sir, should be running a football confederation!


    RM
    If there's any jobs going, I'm interested. How would I get a job working for CAF or CONMEBOL or UEFA or whoever?
    https://www.concacaf.com/inside-concacaf/careers/

    RM
    Would it be Event coordinator that I'd want to go for?

    It looks a little below your level of aspiration (assuming you want to make decisions about future tournament structures) but then I guess you have to start somewhere.



    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Thu Jun 29 14:55:18 2023
    On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:55:20 PM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 4:56:18 PM UTC, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 4:53:51 AM UTC, Lléo wrote:
    Em terça-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2022 às 05:19:53 UTC-3, Werner Pichler escreveu:
    On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:17:59 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
    Em segunda-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2022 às 23:29:42 UTC-3, Sheridan Elliot escreveu:
    If they stick with three-team groups at WC 2026, they will obviously
    have to introduce penalty shoot-outs in the group phase to reduce the
    chance of three-way ties.

    Yet another reason why three team groups are a bad idea. I was thinking of
    the possibility of collusions, but this too is an issue.

    Btw, this could have happened in 1982 too. Does anyone know how would they
    have handled it, had it happened? At least back then they could also consider
    first round records too

    I must have mentally skipped this part of your message. Sorry that I just
    repeated what you already wrote.
    I was actually just wondering about that possibility, I didn't know that for
    a fact. So I indeed learned something from your information.
    (though, however improbable, it could happen that even these wouldn't be
    enough to break a tie).

    Not so improbable though, as the England example shows.
    Yes, it was close enough. And about the English complaints, while I agree with
    their gist, they should indeed have raised them a lot earlier. I mean, FIFA
    was never going to change the rules that deep into the tournament.


    Best regards,

    Lléo
    STOP PRESS

    UEFA announce change to qualifying format to be implemented as of the World Cup 2026 qualifiers.

    The qualifying process will now be 12 groups, some of four teams, some of five.

    The first placed teams in each group qualify for the World Cup, with the runners up going into a qualification playoff.

    Further details and commentary to follow.


    RM
    It had been announced in advance that UEFA would be changing it's qualifying format post Euro 2024. Thoughts turned to possibilities such as turning the system into a league or of integrating the European Championship or Nations League into the
    qualifying process, perhaps by having the top four ranked teams in the Euros qualify for the World Cup.

    Instead, what was announced was quite underwhelming. Not a change of format at all really, more of a tinkering. Still a system that has the European Championship and the World Cup qualifiers existing in isolation. Still a group based qualification
    system, only there will be more, smaller groups.

    The media release which announced the change claims that smaller groups are more dynamic and less predictable than larger groups. I looked back at some qualifying group results when UEFA used to have four team groups in the 80's and early 90's, and yes,
    there were some groups where the top two or even three spots were close. But then you get the same with 6 team groups. Plus even the most competitive four team groups don't solve the problem of the minnow who finishes so far behind the rest that matches
    against them are essentially meaningless.

    It feels like this was a missed opportunity to reform the UEFA qualifiers.

    RM

    UEFA has since confirmed that the four best group winners from the 2024/25 Nations League based on the Nations League overall ranking will join the 12 group runners up from the 2026 World Cup qualifiers to form 16 team playoff round.

    The 16 teams will be drawn into four paths of four with two rounds of single leg knockout matches determining the winners of each path. Path winners qualify for World Cup 2026!

    On one hand I applaud the link between the Nations League and World Cup qualifying as it keeps an otherwise fairly pointless tournament relevant.

    However, I really don't understand why they stuck with single leg playoffs (the did the same for WC 2022) when it clearly unfairly advantages one team and is completely at odds with the rest of the qualifying process as both the World Cup qualifying
    groups and Nations League are played on a home and away leg basis.

    I think the single leg system impacted which teams went through, not necessarily for the good of the tournament. Would Wales (who were awful at Qatar 2022) have survived away legs with Austria and Ukraine, I wonder? For all their giant killing exploits
    in Palermo would North Macedonia have bested Italy over two legs?

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Werner Pichler@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Thu Jun 29 20:04:39 2023
    On Thursday, June 29, 2023 at 11:55:21 PM UTC+2, Real Mardin wrote:

    UEFA has since confirmed that the four best group winners from the 2024/25 Nations League based on the Nations League
    overall ranking will join the 12 group runners up from the 2026 World Cup qualifiers to form 16 team playoff round.

    The 16 teams will be drawn into four paths of four with two rounds of single leg knockout matches determining the winners
    of each path. Path winners qualify for World Cup 2026!

    On one hand I applaud the link between the Nations League and World Cup qualifying as it keeps an otherwise fairly
    pointless tournament relevant.

    However, I really don't understand why they stuck with single leg playoffs (the did the same for WC 2022) when it clearly
    unfairly advantages one team and is completely at odds with the rest of the qualifying process as both the World Cup
    qualifying groups and Nations League are played on a home and away leg basis.

    Single-leg play-offs are one thing, but another problem is the disparity between Nations League cycles.
    Everybody and their neighbour qualify for the Euros, but World Cup berths are much harder to come by, so
    winning your Nations League group is more valuable every other time.

    The clever thing for sub-top teams would be to deliberately get relegated from Nations League A/B
    in 'Euro' cycles, and win your Nations League B/C group in 'World Cup' cycles.

    Ciao,
    Werner


    I think the single leg system impacted which teams went through, not necessarily for the good of the tournament. Would Wales (who were awful at Qatar 2022) have survived away legs with Austria and Ukraine, I wonder? For all their giant killing exploits
    in Palermo would North Macedonia have bested Italy over two legs?

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Werner Pichler on Fri Jun 30 14:14:24 2023
    On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 4:04:41 AM UTC+1, Werner Pichler wrote:
    On Thursday, June 29, 2023 at 11:55:21 PM UTC+2, Real Mardin wrote:

    UEFA has since confirmed that the four best group winners from the 2024/25 Nations League based on the Nations League
    overall ranking will join the 12 group runners up from the 2026 World Cup qualifiers to form 16 team playoff round.

    The 16 teams will be drawn into four paths of four with two rounds of single leg knockout matches determining the winners
    of each path. Path winners qualify for World Cup 2026!

    On one hand I applaud the link between the Nations League and World Cup qualifying as it keeps an otherwise fairly
    pointless tournament relevant.

    However, I really don't understand why they stuck with single leg playoffs (the did the same for WC 2022) when it clearly
    unfairly advantages one team and is completely at odds with the rest of the qualifying process as both the World Cup
    qualifying groups and Nations League are played on a home and away leg basis.
    Single-leg play-offs are one thing, but another problem is the disparity between Nations League cycles.
    Everybody and their neighbour qualify for the Euros, but World Cup berths are much harder to come by, so
    winning your Nations League group is more valuable every other time.

    The clever thing for sub-top teams would be to deliberately get relegated from Nations League A/B
    in 'Euro' cycles, and win your Nations League B/C group in 'World Cup' cycles.

    Ciao,
    Werner
    I think the single leg system impacted which teams went through, not necessarily for the good of the tournament. Would Wales (who were awful at Qatar 2022) have survived away legs with Austria and Ukraine, I wonder? For all their giant killing
    exploits in Palermo would North Macedonia have bested Italy over two legs?

    Finally - an incentive for top teams to take the Nations League seriously!

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 13 14:26:29 2023
    The draw for the CAF World Cup 2026 qualifiers took place today:


    Group A

    Egypt
    Burkina Faso
    Guinea-Bissau
    Sierra Leone
    Ethiopia
    Djibouti



    Group B

    Senegal
    DR Congo
    Mauritania
    Togo
    Sudan
    South Sudan

    (Sudan and South Sudan in the same group??)



    Group C

    Nigeria
    South Africa
    Benin
    Zimbabwe
    Rwanda
    Lesotho



    Group D

    Cameroon
    Cape-Verde
    Angola
    Libya
    Eswatini
    Mauritius


    (What do the Indomitable Lions fans of rss think of this? Could be worse I reckon, although Cape-Verde looked handy at the last AFCON)

    Group E

    Morocco
    Zambia
    Congo
    Tanzania
    Niger
    Eritrea



    Group F

    Cote d’Ivoire
    Gabon
    Kenya
    Gambia
    Burundi
    Seychelles



    Group G

    Algeria
    Guinea
    Uganda
    Mozambique
    Botswana
    Somalia



    Group H

    Tunisia
    Equatorial Guinea
    Namibia
    Malawi
    Liberia
    Sao Tome and Principe



    Group I

    Mali
    Ghana
    Madagascar
    Central African Republic
    Comoros
    Chad

    Ghana were billed as the strongest pot 2 team and certainly the team even more established pot 1 teams were hoping to avoid, so this will be a blow to Mali. Still, when I tried to forecast who might qualify when they first announced WC2026 would be in
    CONCACAF'land I think I picked Mali because they'd had some good youth teams at the time who's players should have come good in time for the qualifiers. I might have just made that up, though.

    The 9 group winners qualify for World Cup 2026, the four highest ranking runners up qualify for the CAF playoffs, the winners of which will qualify for the FIFA Playoff tournament.

    The CAF qualifiers start on 13th November 2023.

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to real_mardin@yahoo.co.uk on Thu Jul 13 23:58:41 2023
    In article <831e342f-6963-48cc-bf39-d775284bc02bn@googlegroups.com>,
    Real Mardin <real_mardin@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    The draw for the CAF World Cup 2026 qualifiers took place today:


    Group A

    Egypt
    Burkina Faso
    Guinea-Bissau
    Sierra Leone
    Ethiopia
    Djibouti



    Group B

    Senegal
    DR Congo
    Mauritania
    Togo
    Sudan
    South Sudan

    (Sudan and South Sudan in the same group??)



    Group C

    Nigeria
    South Africa
    Benin
    Zimbabwe
    Rwanda
    Lesotho



    Group D

    Cameroon
    Cape-Verde
    Angola
    Libya
    Eswatini
    Mauritius


    Worth a watch!


    (What do the Indomitable Lions fans of rss think of this? Could be worse
    I reckon, although Cape-Verde looked handy at the last AFCON)

    Group E

    Morocco
    Zambia
    Congo
    Tanzania
    Niger
    Eritrea



    Group F

    Cote d’Ivoire
    Gabon
    Kenya
    Gambia
    Burundi
    Seychelles



    Group G

    Algeria
    Guinea
    Uganda
    Mozambique
    Botswana
    Somalia



    Group H

    Tunisia
    Equatorial Guinea
    Namibia
    Malawi
    Liberia
    Sao Tome and Principe



    Group I

    Mali
    Ghana
    Madagascar
    Central African Republic
    Comoros
    Chad

    Ghana were billed as the strongest pot 2 team and certainly the team
    even more established pot 1 teams were hoping to avoid, so this will be
    a blow to Mali. Still, when I tried to forecast who might qualify when
    they first announced WC2026 would be in CONCACAF'land I think I picked
    Mali because they'd had some good youth teams at the time who's players >should have come good in time for the qualifiers. I might have just made
    that up, though.

    The 9 group winners qualify for World Cup 2026, the four highest ranking >runners up qualify for the CAF playoffs, the winners of which will
    qualify for the FIFA Playoff tournament.

    The CAF qualifiers start on 13th November 2023.

    RM


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Wealth can get things, especially ingratitude, discontentment and confusion. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Sat Jul 15 01:56:17 2023
    On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 10:26:31 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:

    Group D

    Cameroon
    Cape-Verde
    Angola
    Libya
    Eswatini
    Mauritius


    (What do the Indomitable Lions fans of rss think of this? Could be worse I reckon, although Cape-Verde looked handy at the last AFCON)


    Looks relatively easy to me. I think I'm happy with this.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 28 14:37:39 2023
    Well, it's been called the cruelest round in World football, with 10 teams being eliminated from World Cup qualifying three years before the tournament starts, but AFC has made the draw for the first round of its World Cup 2026 qualifiers:


    Afghanistan v Mongolia

    Maldives v Bangladesh

    Singapore v Guam

    Yemen v Sri Lanka

    Myanmar v Macau

    Cambodia v Pakistan

    Chinese Taipei v Timor-Leste

    Indonesia v Brunei

    Hong Kong v Bhutan

    Nepal v Laos


    First legs are on 12th October and return legs on 17th October 2023.


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 8 15:26:27 2023
    CONMEBOL Matchday 1


    Paraguay 0 - Peru 0

    This result might not sound very exciting or significant, but it was the first qualifying match for World Cup 2026! We're underway!

    Colombia 1 - Venezuela 0

    Argentina 1 - Ecuador 0

    Some guy called Messi (?) scored the winner.

    Sadly there is no UK tv deal in place to broadcast or stream these matches. With the time difference they're on a bit too late for a work night, but I wouldn't have minded streaming them the next day. Hopefully this gets sorted out in time.

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Sat Sep 9 03:11:50 2023
    On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:26:29 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    CONMEBOL Matchday 1


    Paraguay 0 - Peru 0

    This result might not sound very exciting or significant, but it was the first qualifying match for World Cup 2026! We're underway!

    Colombia 1 - Venezuela 0

    Argentina 1 - Ecuador 0

    Some guy called Messi (?) scored the winner.

    The CONMEBOL Matchday 1 results for 8/9 were:

    Uruguay 3 -Chile 1

    Brazil 5 - Bolivia 1


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 24 09:58:58 2023
    OFC are the final confederation to confirm their qualifying process for World Cup 2026:

    First Round: The four lowest ranked teams will play a three match knockout round, with the winner advancing to the second round.

    Second Round: The qualifying team from the first round joins the seven highest ranking teams to form two four team groups. The top two teams from each group advance to the third round.

    Third Round: The four qualifying teams from the second round play a three match knockout round. The winner qualifies for the World Cup, the runner up enters the Inter-Confederation playoff.

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 24 09:34:30 2023
    A little belated, but CONMEBOL Matchday 2 results:

    Bolivia 0 - Argentina 3

    Ecuador 2 - Uruguay 1

    Venezuela 1 - Paraguay 0

    Chile 0 - Colombia 0

    Peru 0 - Brazil 1


    And the standings after two rounds:

    1st Brazil 6pts
    2nd Argentina 6pts
    3rd Colombia 4pts
    4th Uruguay 3pts
    5th Venezuela 3pts
    6th Paraguay 1pt
    7th Peru 1pt
    8th Chile 1pt
    9th Ecuador 0pts (deducted three points)
    10th Bolivia 0pts


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)