1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.SOCCER

  • Blatter and Platini innocent?

    From Mark@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 9 04:40:54 2022
    They've both been acquitted by the court. Does this mean they're innocent?

    Any idea what the implications of this are?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk on Sat Jul 9 14:06:33 2022
    In article <c53353f0-0397-44e5-add3-9f67816d1adbn@googlegroups.com>,
    Mark <Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    They've both been acquitted by the court. Does this mean they're innocent?

    Any idea what the implications of this are?

    Sick!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
    Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Which truth is the correct one? -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Sun Jul 10 08:27:57 2022
    On Saturday, July 9, 2022 at 3:06:35 PM UTC+1, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <c53353f0-0397-44e5...@googlegroups.com>,
    Mark <Pammie...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    They've both been acquitted by the court. Does this mean they're innocent?

    Any idea what the implications of this are?
    Sick!

    Do you mean sick that they were banned if they're innocent or what?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Insane Ranter@21:1/5 to Mark on Sun Jul 10 11:05:35 2022
    On Saturday, July 9, 2022 at 7:40:55 AM UTC-4, Mark wrote:
    They've both been acquitted by the court. Does this mean they're innocent?

    Any idea what the implications of this are?

    No. Courts do not prove innocence. They show a person is not guilty based on the evidence presented by the prosecutor. One of they even quoted after as saying something to the effect of not being innocence their entire life but in this case I am. They
    could technically be guilty just not beyond a preponderance of the evidence.

    Implications none really other than they just get to live out their lives with money.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Al Kamista@21:1/5 to Mark on Sun Jul 10 16:49:21 2022
    On Saturday, July 9, 2022 at 7:40:55 AM UTC-4, Mark wrote:
    They've both been acquitted by the court. Does this mean they're innocent?

    John Gotti was acquitted several times too.

    Don't know about Platini but Blatter was as bent as a nine bob note and the disputed godfather of the FIFA crime family.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Insane Ranter on Mon Jul 11 19:30:22 2022
    On 2022-07-10 12:05, Insane Ranter wrote:
    On Saturday, July 9, 2022 at 7:40:55 AM UTC-4, Mark wrote:
    They've both been acquitted by the court. Does this mean they're innocent? >>
    Any idea what the implications of this are?

    No. Courts do not prove innocence.


    Because they don't need to. At least not in countries where one is
    assumed innocent until proven guilty. Where were they tried/appealed etc ?



    They show a person is not guilty based on the evidence presented by
    the prosecutor. One of they even quoted after as saying something to the
    effect of not being innocence their entire life but in this case I am.
    They could technically be guilty just not beyond a preponderance of the evidence.

    Implications none really other than they just get to live out their lives with money.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)