• Re: Qatar 2022 - the English speaking World Cup?

    From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Wed Jun 15 15:45:33 2022
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 11:41:10 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 11:35:03 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for the most number of nations who use English as an official or predominant language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant) Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales

    So that's 7. Can any World Cup beat that?


    RM
    Italia 90 had 5:

    Cameroon
    England
    Republic of Ireland
    Scotland
    USA


    RM

    Espana 82 also had an impressive 5:

    Cameroon
    England
    New Zealand
    Northern Ireland
    Scotland


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 15 15:35:00 2022
    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for the most number of nations who use English as an official or predominant language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant) Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales

    So that's 7. Can any World Cup beat that?


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Wed Jun 15 15:41:07 2022
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 11:35:03 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for the most number of nations who use English as an official or predominant language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant) Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales

    So that's 7. Can any World Cup beat that?


    RM

    Italia 90 had 5:

    Cameroon
    England
    Republic of Ireland
    Scotland
    USA


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Wed Jun 15 15:49:41 2022
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 11:41:10 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 11:35:03 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for the most number of nations who use English as an official or predominant language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant) Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales

    So that's 7. Can any World Cup beat that?


    RM
    Italia 90 had 5:

    Cameroon
    England
    Republic of Ireland
    Scotland
    USA


    RM

    South Africa 2010:

    Australia
    England
    Cameroon
    Ghana
    New Zealand
    Nigeria
    South Africa
    USA

    8! Looks like we have a winner!

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Thu Jun 16 12:13:32 2022
    On 2022-06-15 16:35, Real Mardin wrote:
    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for the most number of nations who use English as an official or predominant language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant) Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales

    So that's 7. Can any World Cup beat that?

    There are also 7 francophone nations by my count:

    France
    Belgium
    Switzerland
    Canada
    Cameroon
    Morocco
    Senegal

    A fair bit of French spoken in Tunisia, but the official language is
    Arabic.



    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Thu Jun 16 12:11:42 2022
    On 2022-06-15 16:49, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 11:41:10 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 11:35:03 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for the most number of nations who use English as an official or predominant language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant) >>> Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales

    So that's 7. Can any World Cup beat that?


    RM
    Italia 90 had 5:

    Cameroon
    England
    Republic of Ireland
    Scotland
    USA


    RM

    South Africa 2010:

    Australia
    England
    Cameroon
    Ghana
    New Zealand
    Nigeria
    South Africa
    USA

    8! Looks like we have a winner!

    8 out of 32 is the same as 4/16 (1958), though.

    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ammammata@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 17 07:22:42 2022
    Il giorno Thu 16 Jun 2022 12:35:00a, *Real Mardin* ha inviato su rec.sport.soccer il messaggio news:9b9a2160-3666-41da-b9da-9a9546aa3d59n@googlegroups.com. Vediamo
    cosa ha scritto:

    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for
    the most number of nations who use English as an official or
    predominant language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is
    predominant) Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales



    so they can heavily insult each other

    --
    /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\
    -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=-
    ........... [ al lavoro ] ...........

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Sun Jun 19 03:45:23 2022
    On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 1:35:03 AM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for the most number of nations who use English as an official or predominant language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant) Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales

    So that's 7. Can any World Cup beat that?


    RM

    How about Spanish — 10?

    Spain
    Portugal
    Argentina
    Brazil
    Uruguay
    Costa Rica
    Ecuador
    Mexico
    United States
    Canada

    There is a serious problem, though. Russian — 0. That could lead to Armageddon…

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to ionsaliu@gmail.com on Sun Jun 19 11:19:21 2022
    In article <7f60c702-0755-44c4-8ed1-0ac36263b11dn@googlegroups.com>,
    Ion Saliu <ionsaliu@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 1:35:03 AM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for
    the most number of nations who use English as an official or predominant >language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales

    So that's 7. Can any World Cup beat that?


    RM

    How about Spanish — 10?

    Spain
    Portugal
    Argentina
    Brazil
    Uruguay
    Costa Rica
    Ecuador
    Mexico
    United States
    Canada

    There is a serious problem, though. Russian — 0. That could lead to >Armageddon…

    Canada?
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
    Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
    Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Denial of our faults condemns us to their permanence. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Sun Jun 19 12:44:57 2022
    On 2022-06-19 04:45, Ion Saliu wrote:
    On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 1:35:03 AM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
    Can't help but wonder if this year's World Cup breaks the record for the most number of nations who use English as an official or predominant language:

    Australia (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Cameroon
    Canada
    England
    Ghana
    USA (doesn't have an official language but English is predominant)
    Wales

    So that's 7. Can any World Cup beat that?


    RM

    How about Spanish — 10?

    Spain
    Portugal
    Argentina
    Brazil
    Uruguay
    Costa Rica
    Ecuador
    Mexico
    United States
    Canada

    Spanish is certainly not an official language in Canada, and does not
    even rank in the top 5 most spoken mother tongues (English, French,
    Mandarin, Cantonese, Punjabi I think. Tagalog might be next).

    Spanish also does not have official status in the US, or Portugal and I suspect not in Brazil though I would welcome correction there.
    Portugese is the predominant and official language in the last two.

    There is a serious problem, though. Russian — 0. That could lead to Armageddon…

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 19 17:37:59 2022
    MH escreveu:
    On 2022-06-19 04:45, Ion Saliu wrote:
    How about Spanish — 10?

    Spain
    Portugal
    Argentina
    Brazil
    Uruguay
    Costa Rica
    Ecuador
    Mexico
    United States
    Canada

    Spanish is certainly not an official language in Canada, and does not
    even rank in the top 5 most spoken mother tongues (English, French, Mandarin, Cantonese, Punjabi I think. Tagalog might be next).

    Spanish also does not have official status in the US, or Portugal and I suspect not in Brazil though I would welcome correction there.
    Portugese is the predominant and official language in the last two.


    You're right. Indeed it is not even the most widely spoken foreign language
    in Brasil, which is English. I suspect, but do not know that for a fact, that this is also true in Portugal as well (would welcome correction here too).

    Continuing the theme of this thread, I suppose the most Lusophone World Cup ever had to be 2006, with Brasil, Portugal and Angola all involved.

    Most Germanophone WC? I guess it has to be one with all of Germany, Austria
    and Switzerland (maybe Liechtenstein will join them someday in a 48-team WC? :-)). Any other beyond 1934 and 1954?


    --
    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 19 18:24:20 2022
    Ion Saliu escreveu:
    How about Spanish — 10?

    Spain
    Portugal
    Argentina
    Brazil
    Uruguay
    Costa Rica
    Ecuador
    Mexico
    United States
    Canada

    As pointed out elsewhere, we should probably count only 6 or 7 of the above (depending on whether it's fair to count the US or not). For Spanish, that's par for the course for the last 10 WC's or so, more or less, if I looked things
    up correctly. The most Hispanophone WC was 2014, with 9 countries having it as an official or proeminent language: Spain, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Ecuador, Colombia, Mexico, Costa Rica and Honduras. If one prefers to count the US as well, there's your 10.

    In terms of proportion of teams, though, I don't think one could surpass the 1930 World Cup, with 7 of the 13 teams coming from Spanish-speaking countries: Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay, Peru, Chile, Bolivia and Mexico. The US was there
    too fwiw, so maybe 8 if you want to count them?

    The lowest count was in 1938. The Spanish Civil War, coupled with the boycott of Uruguay, Argentina and most of the "Western hemisphere" qualifiers dried
    up the pool of Spanish language qualifiers. Cuba was that WC's sole Spanish speaking representative, thus guaranteeing that the language can be said to have been present in every World Cup.


    --
    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 20 03:16:04 2022
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 4:24:23 AM UTC+3, Lléo wrote:
    Ion Saliu escreveu:
    How about Spanish — 10?

    Spain
    Portugal
    Argentina
    Brazil
    Uruguay
    Costa Rica
    Ecuador
    Mexico
    United States
    Canada
    As pointed out elsewhere, we should probably count only 6 or 7 of the above (depending on whether it's fair to count the US or not). For Spanish, that's par for the course for the last 10 WC's or so, more or less, if I looked things
    up correctly. The most Hispanophone WC was 2014, with 9 countries having it as
    an official or proeminent language: Spain, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Ecuador,
    Colombia, Mexico, Costa Rica and Honduras. If one prefers to count the US as well, there's your 10.

    In terms of proportion of teams, though, I don't think one could surpass the 1930 World Cup, with 7 of the 13 teams coming from Spanish-speaking countries:
    Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay, Peru, Chile, Bolivia and Mexico. The US was there
    too fwiw, so maybe 8 if you want to count them?

    The lowest count was in 1938. The Spanish Civil War, coupled with the boycott
    of Uruguay, Argentina and most of the "Western hemisphere" qualifiers dried up the pool of Spanish language qualifiers. Cuba was that WC's sole Spanish speaking representative, thus guaranteeing that the language can be said to have been present in every World Cup.


    --
    Lléo

    Axiomático:

    I should have added [H] to me reply –
    “Spoiler alert! Humo(u)r involved!”

    No wonder no native English-speaker reacted to my post the way you did.

    I would have expected, though, another type of reaction. Like: “There ain’t no Spanish — it’s Catalan… or it is Basque…”
    BBRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    The clear majority at 2022, however, belongs to NATO: 13 (out of 30 total members… not far from 50%). Can you spot them, aksiomatika?

    After all, soccer is a surrogate for war. Armageddon is coming! Armageddon is coming!

    Fortunately, the Pope is against the war. Can you tell the predominant religion at 2022 World Cup? Spoiler alert: it ain’t the host… although they are more numerous than ever.

    Spoiler alert: The Pope should award the 2022 Champion…


    Ion “Parpaluck” Saliu
    Truthful Warrior At-Large
    https://www.facebook.com/Parpaluck

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Werner Pichler@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 20 05:42:29 2022
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 2:38:01 AM UTC+2, Lléo wrote:
    MH escreveu:
    On 2022-06-19 04:45, Ion Saliu wrote:
    How about Spanish — 10?

    Spain
    Portugal
    Argentina
    Brazil
    Uruguay
    Costa Rica
    Ecuador
    Mexico
    United States
    Canada

    Spanish is certainly not an official language in Canada, and does not
    even rank in the top 5 most spoken mother tongues (English, French, Mandarin, Cantonese, Punjabi I think. Tagalog might be next).

    Spanish also does not have official status in the US, or Portugal and I suspect not in Brazil though I would welcome correction there.
    Portugese is the predominant and official language in the last two.
    You're right. Indeed it is not even the most widely spoken foreign language in Brasil, which is English. I suspect, but do not know that for a fact, that
    this is also true in Portugal as well (would welcome correction here too).

    Continuing the theme of this thread, I suppose the most Lusophone World Cup ever had to be 2006, with Brasil, Portugal and Angola all involved.

    Most Germanophone WC? I guess it has to be one with all of Germany, Austria and Switzerland (maybe Liechtenstein will join them someday in a 48-team WC? :-)). Any other beyond 1934 and 1954?


    1938 had Germany and Austria in it - in theory, but then actually also in practice... better drop it.

    1934 and 1954 both also had Belgium and Italy in it, two countries where German today is an official
    language (although it wasn't at the time).

    (and 1934 Czechoslovakia had a population of 20% German speakers. Better drop that, too)


    Ciao,
    Werner



    --
    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jesus Petry@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 20 07:38:15 2022
    Em segunda-feira, 20 de junho de 2022 às 07:16:07 UTC-3, ions...@gmail.com escreveu:
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 4:24:23 AM UTC+3, Lléo wrote:
    Ion Saliu escreveu:
    How about Spanish — 10?

    Spain
    Portugal
    Argentina
    Brazil
    Uruguay
    Costa Rica
    Ecuador
    Mexico
    United States
    Canada
    As pointed out elsewhere, we should probably count only 6 or 7 of the above
    (depending on whether it's fair to count the US or not). For Spanish, that's
    par for the course for the last 10 WC's or so, more or less, if I looked things
    up correctly. The most Hispanophone WC was 2014, with 9 countries having it as
    an official or proeminent language: Spain, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Ecuador,
    Colombia, Mexico, Costa Rica and Honduras. If one prefers to count the US as
    well, there's your 10.

    In terms of proportion of teams, though, I don't think one could surpass the
    1930 World Cup, with 7 of the 13 teams coming from Spanish-speaking countries:
    Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay, Peru, Chile, Bolivia and Mexico. The US was there
    too fwiw, so maybe 8 if you want to count them?

    The lowest count was in 1938. The Spanish Civil War, coupled with the boycott
    of Uruguay, Argentina and most of the "Western hemisphere" qualifiers dried
    up the pool of Spanish language qualifiers. Cuba was that WC's sole Spanish
    speaking representative, thus guaranteeing that the language can be said to
    have been present in every World Cup.


    --
    Lléo
    Axiomático:

    I should have added [H] to me reply –
    “Spoiler alert! Humo(u)r involved!”

    I did understand your attempt at humor, and therefore didn't bother to respond.

    But it was easy to miss it, because in your post you seemed to play two opposing roles at once for comedic effect, a bit too sophisticated and surreal. Not many people are used to that.

    Tchau!
    Jesus Petry

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Tue Jun 21 02:32:24 2022
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 1:16:07 PM UTC+3, Ion Saliu wrote:


    Aksiomatika:

    I should have added [H] to me reply –
    “Spoiler alert! Humo(u)r involved!”

    No wonder no native English-speaker reacted to my post the way you did.

    I would have expected, though, another type of reaction. Like: “There ain’t no Spanish — it’s Catalan… or it is Basque…”
    BBRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    The clear majority at 2022, however, belongs to NATO: 13 (out of 30 total members… not far from 50%). Can you spot them, aksiomatika?

    After all, soccer is a surrogate for war. Armageddon is coming! Armageddon is coming!

    Fortunately, the Pope is against the war. Can you tell the predominant religion at 2022 World Cup? Spoiler alert: it ain’t the host… although they are more numerous than ever.

    Spoiler alert: The Pope should award the 2022 Champion…


    Ion “Parpaluck” Saliu
    Truthful Warrior At-Large
    https://www.facebook.com/Parpaluck

    Other interesting facts about the World Cup –

    You watch a match, say, in the Top-5 European championships, or in UEFA Champions League. You notice religion is omnipresent. The players perform religious acts, especially praying and looking up to the sky (like to the Supreme Referee). Most prayers are
    representative of Catholicism and Islam. Which brings me to this fact:

    • The Vatican holds the most World Cups: 16 trophies
    • Protestantism: 5
    • Orthodox Christianity: 0
    • Islam: 0
    • Buddhism: 0
    • Hindu: 0
    • Shinto: 0
    • Other credos: 0

    From another perspective, NATO holds the most World Cup trophies: 12.
    • Warsaw Pact: 0 (where art thou Hungary... Russia... Ukraine... ?)
    • Other military alliances: 0

    Las Vegas is brewing some enticing bets for this edition of the World Cup – • [(NATO) AND (Catholic)]: (7 titles so far) ?
    • [(NATO) AND (Protestant)]: (5 so far) ?

    The latter is the most attractive bet to me (the opening line was 13/1). Holland failed too many times in the finals (3 so far)…

    BBRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to Werner Pichler on Tue Jun 21 07:21:59 2022
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 1:42:32 PM UTC+1, Werner Pichler wrote:


    Most Germanophone WC? I guess it has to be one with all of Germany, Austria and Switzerland (maybe Liechtenstein will join them someday in a 48-team WC?
    :-)). Any other beyond 1934 and 1954?
    1938 had Germany and Austria in it - in theory, but then actually also in practice... better drop it.

    1934 and 1954 both also had Belgium and Italy in it, two countries where German today is an official
    language (although it wasn't at the time).

    (and 1934 Czechoslovakia had a population of 20% German speakers. Better drop that, too)


    1934 edges it, because only part of Germany (West Germany) were at the 1954 World Cup.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Mark on Tue Jun 21 11:36:09 2022
    On 2022-06-21 08:21, Mark wrote:
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 1:42:32 PM UTC+1, Werner Pichler wrote:


    Most Germanophone WC? I guess it has to be one with all of Germany, Austria >>> and Switzerland (maybe Liechtenstein will join them someday in a 48-team WC?
    :-)). Any other beyond 1934 and 1954?
    1938 had Germany and Austria in it - in theory, but then actually also in practice... better drop it.

    1934 and 1954 both also had Belgium and Italy in it, two countries where German today is an official
    language (although it wasn't at the time).

    (and 1934 Czechoslovakia had a population of 20% German speakers. Better drop that, too)


    1934 edges it, because only part of Germany (West Germany) were at the 1954 World Cup.

    ??? The premise here is number of German speaking countries, and the
    federal republic of Germany (West Germany) was a German speaking
    country. 1954 had 3 countries in the finals that had German as an
    official language (at that time). The Saarland could also have
    qualified but were drawn in a group with Germany. Although I guess they
    were a protectorate, not a country. East Germany first entered the WCQ
    in the 1958 version.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ixion martin - GdBx@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 21 23:41:16 2022
    Ion Saliu a couché sur son écran :

    There is a serious problem, though. Russian — 0.

    Poland soon...

    --
    Ixion

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 21 19:16:55 2022
    Jesus Petry escreveu:
    Em segunda-feira, 20 de junho de 2022 às 07:16:07 UTC-3, Ion Saliu escreveu:
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 4:24:23 AM UTC+3, Lléo wrote:

    [Let's snip what I wrote about Spanish language countries in the WC]

    Axiomático:

    I should have added [H] to me reply –
    “Spoiler alert! Humo(u)r involved!”

    I did understand your attempt at humor, and therefore didn't bother to respond.

    But it was easy to miss it, because in your post you seemed to play two opposing roles at once for comedic effect, a bit too sophisticated and surreal. Not many people are used to that.


    Actually, I was just taking the hook to add some trivia about something I had never thought about in World Cups. Seemed in line with the topic ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    So, trivia time for you people. There are three languages that have been "represented" in every World Cup. I just told you all what one of them is,
    in my previous post. But what are the other two?


    --
    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 21 21:41:38 2022
    On 2022-06-21 20:16, Lléo wrote:
    Jesus Petry escreveu:
    Em segunda-feira, 20 de junho de 2022 às 07:16:07 UTC-3, Ion Saliu escreveu:
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 4:24:23 AM UTC+3, Lléo wrote:

    [Let's snip what I wrote about Spanish language countries in the WC]

    Axiomático:

    I should have added [H] to me reply –
    “Spoiler alert! Humo(u)r involved!”

    I did understand your attempt at humor, and therefore didn't bother to respond.

    But it was easy to miss it, because in your post you seemed to play two
    opposing roles at once for comedic effect, a bit too sophisticated and
    surreal. Not many people are used to that.


    Actually, I was just taking the hook to add some trivia about something I had never thought about in World Cups. Seemed in line with the topic ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    So, trivia time for you people. There are three languages that have been "represented" in every World Cup. I just told you all what one of them is,
    in my previous post. But what are the other two?


    Well Brazil have played in all of them, right ? So portugese.
    And I have an inkling French is the other one. Belgium were there in
    1930, France in the next two. Add in Switzerland and Haiti, and I think
    every cup is covered.

    --
    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Wed Jun 22 04:23:53 2022
    On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 12:32:28 PM UTC+3, Ion Saliu wrote:
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 1:16:07 PM UTC+3, Ion Saliu wrote:


    Aksiomatika:

    I should have added [H] to me reply –
    “Spoiler alert! Humo(u)r involved!”

    No wonder no native English-speaker reacted to my post the way you did.

    I would have expected, though, another type of reaction. Like: “There ain’t no Spanish — it’s Catalan… or it is Basque…”
    BBRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    The clear majority at 2022, however, belongs to NATO: 13 (out of 30 total members… not far from 50%). Can you spot them, aksiomatika?

    After all, soccer is a surrogate for war. Armageddon is coming! Armageddon is coming!

    Fortunately, the Pope is against the war. Can you tell the predominant religion at 2022 World Cup? Spoiler alert: it ain’t the host… although they are more numerous than ever.

    Spoiler alert: The Pope should award the 2022 Champion…


    Ion “Parpaluck” Saliu
    Truthful Warrior At-Large
    https://www.facebook.com/Parpaluck
    Other interesting facts about the World Cup –

    You watch a match, say, in the Top-5 European championships, or in UEFA Champions League. You notice religion is omnipresent. The players perform religious acts, especially praying and looking up to the sky (like to the Supreme Referee). Most prayers
    are representative of Catholicism and Islam. Which brings me to this fact:

    • The Vatican holds the most World Cups: 16 trophies
    • Protestantism: 5
    • Orthodox Christianity: 0
    • Islam: 0
    • Buddhism: 0
    • Hindu: 0
    • Shinto: 0
    • Other credos: 0

    From another perspective, NATO holds the most World Cup trophies: 12.
    • Warsaw Pact: 0 (where art thou Hungary... Russia... Ukraine... ?)
    • Other military alliances: 0

    Las Vegas is brewing some enticing bets for this edition of the World Cup –
    • [(NATO) AND (Catholic)]: (7 titles so far) ?
    • [(NATO) AND (Protestant)]: (5 so far) ?

    The latter is the most attractive bet to me (the opening line was 13/1). Holland failed too many times in the finals (3 so far)…

    BBRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    Ultra Axiomatix:

    This thingy really intrigues me: Religion and World Cup. It is even more intriguing since I am the founder of Mathematical Atheism.

    It is this lopsided success in World Cups for a religion known as Catholicism. 16 trophies! The only other successful religion, with 5 successes, is also Christian: Protestantism. What gives?

    For the record, I was born religious. Like any child, there ain’t nothing you can do about it. You are forced to belong to a religion from day one.

    So, I was born Orthodox Christian. Since the pandemic, I had to watch quite a few football matches in the Romanian championship. The players do the same thing as in any other championship. They perform religious rituals. As the Romanians are
    predominantly Orthodox, the footballers perform a specific ritual: Crossing (the sign of the cross from the forehead to the belly, and then from the right shoulder to the left).

    Other Orthodox footballers do the same: Greeks, Russians, Ukrainians, Serbs, etc. However, them Orthodox footballers have never had any success. The Supreme Referee has granted them only mediocrity! Why they don’t abandon their ritual is beyond me!

    On the other hand, look how grandiosely the Supreme Referee (now VAR) has rewarded the Catholics! 16 out of 21 World Cup titles! The Vegas odds on [Catholik] are a meager 3/5. Of course, it is so easy to win with such a bet!

    The Protestants have had some success: 5 trophies. Their ritual is different from the Catholics, though. The Protestants kneel before the match starts. Instead of looking up toward the Supreme Referee, they look down. As if they pray to the grassroots to
    be kind to them and make the opponents slip and break their legs!

    Why aren’t the rest of the religions successful at all? What’s the matter? The Muslim players pray too, and they look up to the sky as well. The Buddhists, as few as they are, fall on the grass before the match and start short meditation sessions. I
    even heard the “Om” chant at times.

    What’s so special about the Catholic rituals? As far as I can tell, I only noticed:
    • kissing own fingers, then looking up to the sky where the Supreme Referee (now VAR) is supposed to reside.

    “People who believe in gods
    Are mighty frightened by the odds
    But I give them software
    To beat the odds with fanfare.”

    Ion Saliu (royalty-name Parpaluck)
    Founder of Mathematical Atheism
    https://saliu.com/almighty_number.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to MHnospam@ucalgary.ca on Wed Jun 22 13:02:28 2022
    In article <t8u31k$6vj$1@dont-email.me>, MH <MHnospam@ucalgary.ca> wrote:
    On 2022-06-21 20:16, Lléo wrote:
    Jesus Petry escreveu:
    Em segunda-feira, 20 de junho de 2022 às 07:16:07 UTC-3, Ion Saliu escreveu:
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 4:24:23 AM UTC+3, Lléo wrote:

    [Let's snip what I wrote about Spanish language countries in the WC]

    Axiomático:

    I should have added [H] to me reply –
    “Spoiler alert! Humo(u)r involved!”

    I did understand your attempt at humor, and therefore didn't bother
    to respond.

    But it was easy to miss it, because in your post you seemed to play two
    opposing roles at once for comedic effect, a bit too sophisticated and
    surreal. Not many people are used to that.


    Actually, I was just taking the hook to add some trivia about something I had
    never thought about in World Cups. Seemed in line with the topic ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    So, trivia time for you people. There are three languages that have been
    "represented" in every World Cup. I just told you all what one of them is, >> in my previous post. But what are the other two?


    Well Brazil have played in all of them, right ? So portugese.
    And I have an inkling French is the other one. Belgium were there in
    1930, France in the next two. Add in Switzerland and Haiti, and I think >every cup is covered.

    Sepaking of which, how hot is it in Qatar?


    --
    Lléo



    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
    Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
    Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Saying the right words is a poor substitute for having a right heart. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 22 06:26:35 2022
    On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 6:36:13 PM UTC+1, MH wrote:
    On 2022-06-21 08:21, Mark wrote:
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 1:42:32 PM UTC+1, Werner Pichler wrote:


    Most Germanophone WC? I guess it has to be one with all of Germany, Austria
    and Switzerland (maybe Liechtenstein will join them someday in a 48-team WC?
    :-)). Any other beyond 1934 and 1954?
    1938 had Germany and Austria in it - in theory, but then actually also in practice... better drop it.

    1934 and 1954 both also had Belgium and Italy in it, two countries where German today is an official
    language (although it wasn't at the time).

    (and 1934 Czechoslovakia had a population of 20% German speakers. Better drop that, too)


    1934 edges it, because only part of Germany (West Germany) were at the 1954 World Cup.
    ??? The premise here is number of German speaking countries, and the
    federal republic of Germany (West Germany) was a German speaking
    country. 1954 had 3 countries in the finals that had German as an
    official language (at that time). The Saarland could also have
    qualified but were drawn in a group with Germany. Although I guess they
    were a protectorate, not a country. East Germany first entered the WCQ
    in the 1958 version.

    Well, there could be a (possibly weak) case for claiming West Germany was only half a country.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Real Mardin@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 22 12:56:34 2022
    The thread title also begs the question "What was the least English speaking World Cup?"

    The answer is 1938 - not a single English speaking team were at the tournament.

    Dutch was, however, very well represented, with the following three nations being at the tournament:


    Belgium

    Dutch East Indies

    Netherlands


    RM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Mark on Wed Jun 22 20:18:14 2022
    Mark wrote:

    On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 6:36:13 PM UTC+1, MH wrote:
    ??? The premise here is number of German speaking countries, and
    the federal republic of Germany (West Germany) was a German
    speaking country. 1954 had 3 countries in the finals that had
    German as an official language (at that time). The Saarland could
    also have qualified but were drawn in a group with Germany.
    Although I guess they were a protectorate, not a country. East
    Germany first entered the WCQ in the 1958 version.

    Well, there could be a (possibly weak) case for claiming West Germany
    was only half a country.

    There could also be a case for claiming that [post-WWII] West Germany
    was only a third of a country...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 22 16:06:57 2022
    MH escreveu:
    On 2022-06-21 20:16, Lléo wrote:

    Actually, I was just taking the hook to add some trivia about something I had
    never thought about in World Cups. Seemed in line with the topic ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    So, trivia time for you people. There are three languages that have been "represented" in every World Cup. I just told you all what one of them is, in my previous post. But what are the other two?

    Well Brazil have played in all of them, right ? So portugese.
    And I have an inkling French is the other one. Belgium were there in
    1930, France in the next two. Add in Switzerland and Haiti, and I think every cup is covered.


    Indeed! For some reason I was kinda expecting English to have been ever present as well, but as Real Mardin pointed out in another post, there was
    no English speaking country in WC 1938.

    German also misses only one Cup, 1930. Germany's near perfect attendance in the World Cup pretty much guarantees its presence every time. Switzerland
    was there in the only other World Cup they missed, 1950.

    A similar case goes for Italian, which has only gone missing in two World
    Cups. Not the present-day two in a row to which Italy failed to qualify,
    as Switzerland again came to the rescue in these, but the other two Cups,
    1930 and 1958.

    Another quiz question for you rss people: what was the least linguistically diverse World Cup?


    --
    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 23 08:15:14 2022
    On 2022-06-22 17:06, Lléo wrote:
    MH escreveu:
    On 2022-06-21 20:16, Lléo wrote:

    Actually, I was just taking the hook to add some trivia about something I had
    never thought about in World Cups. Seemed in line with the topic ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    So, trivia time for you people. There are three languages that have been >>> "represented" in every World Cup. I just told you all what one of them is, >>> in my previous post. But what are the other two?

    Well Brazil have played in all of them, right ? So portugese.
    And I have an inkling French is the other one. Belgium were there in
    1930, France in the next two. Add in Switzerland and Haiti, and I think
    every cup is covered.

    I forgot Zaire. La francophonie was saved by Haiti and Zaire in 1974,
    which seems to have been the only year none of France, Belgium and
    Switzerland qualified. Haiti had home advantage for the final
    qualifying tournament, and Zaire had home advantage for a replay after
    the two legs vs. Cameroon ended all square - so it was close, I guess,
    and could have come out differently. The expansion of the WC and the
    larger african representation makes it very unlikely that there will
    ever be a WC without Francophone teams.


    Indeed! For some reason I was kinda expecting English to have been ever present as well, but as Real Mardin pointed out in another post, there was
    no English speaking country in WC 1938.

    German also misses only one Cup, 1930. Germany's near perfect attendance in the World Cup pretty much guarantees its presence every time. Switzerland
    was there in the only other World Cup they missed, 1950.

    A similar case goes for Italian, which has only gone missing in two World Cups. Not the present-day two in a row to which Italy failed to qualify,
    as Switzerland again came to the rescue in these, but the other two Cups, 1930 and 1958.

    Another quiz question for you rss people: what was the least linguistically diverse World Cup?


    --
    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Futbolmetrix@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 23 11:17:30 2022
    On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 7:07:00 PM UTC-4, Lléo wrote:

    Another quiz question for you rss people: what was the least linguistically diverse World Cup?


    Nice thread. How do you measure linguistic diversity? Something like a Herfindahl index (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herfindahl%E2%80%93Hirschman_index)? Or do you also take into account the linguistic distance between NTs? (That is, a WC with exactly
    half the teams that speak Spanish and half the teams that speak French would be less diverse than one in which half the teams speak Spanish and the other half speaks Japanese...)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 23 21:37:28 2022
    Futbolmetrix escreveu:
    On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 7:07:00 PM UTC-4, Lléo wrote:

    Another quiz question for you rss people: what was the least linguistically
    diverse World Cup?

    Nice thread. How do you measure linguistic diversity?


    I had just gone for the naive approach of counting how many languages were "represented" in each WC :-) (btw, under that premise, the answer is 1930,
    9 languages). But...


    Something like a Herfindahl index (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herfindahl%E2%80%93Hirschman_index)?


    ..why not try this? With language data gathered from each country's Wikipedia entry and indexes below multiplied by 10,000, here's what I got:

    [pos] WC Herfindahl
    [ 1] 1930 2343.75
    [ 2] 1950 1604.94
    [ 3] 1978 1200.00
    [ 4] 2014 1075.00
    [ 5] 2022 1052.94
    [ 6] 2018 927.02
    [ 7] 1974 925.93
    [ 8] 2006 889.80
    [ 9] 1934 884.35
    [10] 1938 839.00
    [11] 1994 820.31
    [12] 1954 775.05
    [13] 2010 746.94
    [14] 1998 661.63
    [15] 2002 656.79
    [16] 1966 585.94
    [17] 1962 540.12
    [18] 1982 537.19
    [19] 1986 524.61
    [20] 1958 486.69
    [21] 1990 475.21
    [22] 1970 415.22

    (hopefully the above table shows up ok in your screens)

    So, it would seem that the answer, again, is 1930. Maybe this isn't really surprising, given that it was the first WC and its participants were heavily concentrated in a region that largely speaks the same language.

    Interestingly, the seven most linguistically diverse WC's (by this measure, anyway) would seem to be, in chronological order, 1958, 1962, 1966, 1970, 1982,
    1986 and 1990. Of course, these were World Cups with the presence of the USSR and its republics' 15 national languages boosting up the total number of tongues
    spoken in these WC's. And next in line come 1998, 2002 and 2010 - the three WC's with South Africa in them (bringing in their 11 official languages aboard).

    I don't know if the above is a "problem" or not for this measure. If it is, I'm not sure how to deal with it. It certainly impacts the calculations: for example,
    if we counted only one language for the USSR, 1958, 1962 and 1966 would have been
    kicked to the other end of the diversity spectrum (they'd become the 6th, 5th and
    3rd *least* diverse Cups). Similarly, if we counted, say, only two languages for
    South Africa, 1998, 2002 and 2010 would become the 7th, 8th and 4th least diverse
    Cups.

    As far as I remember, these are the only two with such a high number of language
    counts (IIRC the next in line is Switzerland, with 4?).


    Or do you also take into account the linguistic distance between NTs? (That is,
    a WC with exactly half the teams that speak Spanish and half the teams that speak
    French would be less diverse than one in which half the teams speak Spanish and
    the other half speaks Japanese...)


    That would be an interesting one. I'd give it a stab, but I don't know where to find
    data on linguistic distances. Actually, for what it's worth (and maybe it's not much),
    I dug up this from a quick Google search:

    https://www.ezglot.com/language-similarity-matrix.html

    I have no idea, though, whether these numbers are accurate or meaningful for this
    subject.


    --
    Lléo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to Real Mardin on Sat Jun 25 03:54:10 2022
    On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 8:56:38 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
    The thread title also begs the question "What was the least English speaking World Cup?"

    The answer is 1938 - not a single English speaking team were at the tournament.

    Dutch was, however, very well represented, with the following three nations being at the tournament:


    Belgium

    Dutch East Indies

    Netherlands


    RM

    What was the least Spanish speaking World Cup?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ion Saliu@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Sat Nov 19 06:32:00 2022
    On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 2:23:56 PM UTC+3, Ion Saliu wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 12:32:28 PM UTC+3, Ion Saliu wrote:
    On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 1:16:07 PM UTC+3, Ion Saliu wrote:


    Aksiomatika:

    I should have added [H] to me reply –
    “Spoiler alert! Humo(u)r involved!”

    No wonder no native English-speaker reacted to my post the way you did.

    I would have expected, though, another type of reaction. Like: “There ain’t no Spanish — it’s Catalan… or it is Basque…”
    BBRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    The clear majority at 2022, however, belongs to NATO: 13 (out of 30 total members… not far from 50%). Can you spot them, aksiomatika?

    After all, soccer is a surrogate for war. Armageddon is coming! Armageddon is coming!

    Fortunately, the Pope is against the war. Can you tell the predominant religion at 2022 World Cup? Spoiler alert: it ain’t the host… although they are more numerous than ever.

    Spoiler alert: The Pope should award the 2022 Champion…


    Ion “Parpaluck” Saliu
    Truthful Warrior At-Large
    https://www.facebook.com/Parpaluck
    Other interesting facts about the World Cup –

    You watch a match, say, in the Top-5 European championships, or in UEFA Champions League. You notice religion is omnipresent. The players perform religious acts, especially praying and looking up to the sky (like to the Supreme Referee). Most prayers
    are representative of Catholicism and Islam. Which brings me to this fact:

    • The Vatican holds the most World Cups: 16 trophies
    • Protestantism: 5
    • Orthodox Christianity: 0
    • Islam: 0
    • Buddhism: 0
    • Hindu: 0
    • Shinto: 0
    • Other credos: 0

    From another perspective, NATO holds the most World Cup trophies: 12.
    • Warsaw Pact: 0 (where art thou Hungary... Russia... Ukraine... ?)
    • Other military alliances: 0

    Las Vegas is brewing some enticing bets for this edition of the World Cup –
    • [(NATO) AND (Catholic)]: (7 titles so far) ?
    • [(NATO) AND (Protestant)]: (5 so far) ?

    The latter is the most attractive bet to me (the opening line was 13/1). Holland failed too many times in the finals (3 so far)…

    BBRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
    Ultra Axiomatix:

    This thingy really intrigues me: Religion and World Cup. It is even more intriguing since I am the founder of Mathematical Atheism.

    It is this lopsided success in World Cups for a religion known as Catholicism. 16 trophies! The only other successful religion, with 5 successes, is also Christian: Protestantism. What gives?

    For the record, I was born religious. Like any child, there ain’t nothing you can do about it. You are forced to belong to a religion from day one.

    So, I was born Orthodox Christian. Since the pandemic, I had to watch quite a few football matches in the Romanian championship. The players do the same thing as in any other championship. They perform religious rituals. As the Romanians are
    predominantly Orthodox, the footballers perform a specific ritual: Crossing (the sign of the cross from the forehead to the belly, and then from the right shoulder to the left).

    Other Orthodox footballers do the same: Greeks, Russians, Ukrainians, Serbs, etc. However, them Orthodox footballers have never had any success. The Supreme Referee has granted them only mediocrity! Why they don’t abandon their ritual is beyond me!

    On the other hand, look how grandiosely the Supreme Referee (now VAR) has rewarded the Catholics! 16 out of 21 World Cup titles! The Vegas odds on [Catholik] are a meager 3/5. Of course, it is so easy to win with such a bet!

    The Protestants have had some success: 5 trophies. Their ritual is different from the Catholics, though. The Protestants kneel before the match starts. Instead of looking up toward the Supreme Referee, they look down. As if they pray to the grassroots
    to be kind to them and make the opponents slip and break their legs!

    Why aren’t the rest of the religions successful at all? What’s the matter? The Muslim players pray too, and they look up to the sky as well. The Buddhists, as few as they are, fall on the grass before the match and start short meditation sessions.
    I even heard the “Om” chant at times.

    What’s so special about the Catholic rituals? As far as I can tell, I only noticed this ritual before and during a football match:
    • crossing from left to right, kissing own fingers, and then looking up to the sky where the Supreme Referee (now VAR) is supposed to reside.

    Will Qatar finally win a World Cup for Islam? I mean, it was against all odds that Qatar was even selected to host the 2022 World Cup. You’ll be surprised how far the petrodollars can go!

    “People who believe in gods
    Are mighty frightened by the odds
    But I give them software
    To beat the odds with fanfare.”

    Ion Saliu (royalty-name Parpaluck)
    Founder of Mathematical Atheism
    https://saliu.com/almighty_number.html


    Gosh! Nothing ever changes! Them Catholics again are favored. They chant loud and clear Brazil, Argentina, France… even if it all happens in the Land of Allah! Why don’t they ban the Pope from attending the World Cup games?! Instead, them Qataris
    banned TV people from Denmark, a protestant nation! Ban the Catholics, you fools, if want to win the World Cup!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Ion Saliu on Sat Nov 19 16:35:57 2022
    Ion Saliu wrote:

    Will Qatar finally win a World Cup for Islam? I mean, it was against
    all odds that Qatar was even selected to host the 2022 World Cup.
    You’ll be surprised how far the petrodollars can go!

    Qatar?!! IF Qatar was to win the FIFA World Cup 2022 then FIFA would
    definitely have reached the peak of corruption... I'd like to say not
    possible, but FIFA tend to prove me wrong time and time again.

    Judging by Infantino's comments in his press conference this morning,
    the Petrodollars have clearly gone very far... but I doubt they've gone
    as far as to stop Brazil, Argentina, France (etc.) from doing their
    stuff in the next few weeks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)