B) Inter-tier matches! Three groups of three teams. Each team plays 4 matches against its own-tier opponents, plus two matches against a team from one of the other tiers. We would need 7 gameweeks to accommodate this tournament. 6 regular weeks with 4matches each (the three intra-tier matches, plus one inter-tier match), and one team gets a bye; and one extra week with three matches, and three teams get a bye. I think I have been able to design a schedule where each team plays exactly three matches
Thoughts?
Interesting developments for season 58. If we have the same roster of >participants as in Season 57, the tiers would be:
Tier 1:
MH
The Doctor
Mark
Futbolmetrix
Tier 2:
milivella
Werner Pichler
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
HOWEVER, Blueshirt has expressed interest in joining the game (yay!),
and it would be about time that UPT increased its number of players
again. Assuming Blueshirt confirms his participation, we would have 9 >players, which makes the scheduling a bit tricky. A number of possible >solutions:
A) Three groups of three teams, round robin home and away. Four
gameweeks in total, each week three teams (one in each group) gets a
bye.
A1) Same as A, but double the number of matches: Eight gameweeks in
total, each team three teams (one in each group) gets a bye.
B) Inter-tier matches! Three groups of three teams. Each team plays 4
matches against its own-tier opponents, plus two matches against a team
from one of the other tiers. We would need 7 gameweeks to accommodate
this tournament. 6 regular weeks with 4 matches each (the three
intra-tier matches, plus one inter-tier match), and one team gets a bye;
and one extra week with three matches, and three teams get a bye. I
think I have been able to design a schedule where each team plays
exactly three matches at home and three matches away, and no team plays
more than two consecutive matches home or away.
C) One group of 4 and one group of 5. The 4-team tier requires 6
gameweeks, but the 5 team tier requires 10 gameweeks for a full round
robin. Maybe a shortened/unbalanced schedule for the 5-team tier?
D) We recruit other players (or BOTs) to fill up the roster, so that we
have either 2 groups of 5 teams, or 3 groups of 4.
Thoughts?
Interesting developments for season 58. If we have the same
roster of participants as in Season 57, the tiers would be:
Tier 1:
MH The Doctor
Mark
Futbolmetrix
Tier 2:
milivella
Werner Pichler
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
HOWEVER, Blueshirt has expressed interest in joining the game
(yay!), and it would be about time that UPT increased its
number of players again. Assuming Blueshirt confirms his
participation, we would have 9 players, which makes the
scheduling a bit tricky. A number of possible solutions:
Interesting developments for season 58. If we have the same roster of participants as in Season 57, the tiers would be:
Tier 1:
MH The Doctor
Mark
Futbolmetrix
Tier 2:
milivella
Werner Pichler
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
HOWEVER, Blueshirt has expressed interest in joining the game (yay!),
and it would be about time that UPT increased its number of players
again. Assuming Blueshirt confirms his participation, we would have 9 players, which makes the scheduling a bit tricky. A number of possible solutions:
A) Three groups of three teams, round robin home and away. Four
gameweeks in total, each week three teams (one in each group) gets a bye.
A1) Same as A, but double the number of matches: Eight gameweeks in
total, each team three teams (one in each group) gets a bye.
B) Inter-tier matches! Three groups of three teams. Each team plays 4
matches against its own-tier opponents, plus two matches against a team
from one of the other tiers. We would need 7 gameweeks to accommodate
this tournament. 6 regular weeks with 4 matches each (the three
intra-tier matches, plus one inter-tier match), and one team gets a bye;
and one extra week with three matches, and three teams get a bye. I
think I have been able to design a schedule where each team plays
exactly three matches at home and three matches away, and no team plays
more than two consecutive matches home or away.
C) One group of 4 and one group of 5. The 4-team tier requires 6
gameweeks, but the 5 team tier requires 10 gameweeks for a full round
robin. Maybe a shortened/unbalanced schedule for the 5-team tier?
D) We recruit other players (or BOTs) to fill up the roster, so that we
have either 2 groups of 5 teams, or 3 groups of 4.
Thoughts?
Futbolmetrix wrote:
Interesting developments for season 58. If we have the same
roster of participants as in Season 57, the tiers would be:
Tier 1:
MH The Doctor
Mark
Futbolmetrix
Tier 2:
milivella
Werner Pichler
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
HOWEVER, Blueshirt has expressed interest in joining the game
(yay!), and it would be about time that UPT increased its
number of players again. Assuming Blueshirt confirms his
participation, we would have 9 players, which makes the
scheduling a bit tricky. A number of possible solutions:
Count me in. If you can fit me in!
As long as the rules are somewhere and I know what I have to do,
I'll give it a go.
Interesting developments for season 58. If we have the same roster of participants as in Season 57, the tiers would be:
Tier 1:
MH The Doctor
Mark
Futbolmetrix
Tier 2:
milivella
Werner Pichler
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
HOWEVER, Blueshirt has expressed interest in joining the game (yay!),
and it would be about time that UPT increased its number of players
again. Assuming Blueshirt confirms his participation, we would have 9 players, which makes the scheduling a bit tricky. A number of
possible solutions:
A) Three groups of three teams, round robin home and away. Four
gameweeks in total, each week three teams (one in each group) gets a
bye.
A1) Same as A, but double the number of matches: Eight gameweeks in
total, each team three teams (one in each group) gets a bye.
B) Inter-tier matches! Three groups of three teams. Each team plays 4
matches against its own-tier opponents, plus two matches against a
team from one of the other tiers. We would need 7 gameweeks to
accommodate this tournament. 6 regular weeks with 4 matches each (the
three intra-tier matches, plus one inter-tier match), and one team
gets a bye; and one extra week with three matches, and three teams
get a bye. I think I have been able to design a schedule where each
team plays exactly three matches at home and three matches away, and
no team plays more than two consecutive matches home or away.
C) One group of 4 and one group of 5. The 4-team tier requires 6
gameweeks, but the 5 team tier requires 10 gameweeks for a full round
robin. Maybe a shortened/unbalanced schedule for the 5-team tier? D)
We recruit other players (or BOTs) to fill up the roster, so that we
have either 2 groups of 5 teams, or 3 groups of 4.
Thoughts?
3. Experiment with a Swiss system ?
developing an Elo rating of UPT players!
Interesting developments for season 58. If we have the same roster of participants as in Season 57, the tiers would be:
Tier 1:
MH
The Doctor
Mark
Futbolmetrix
Tier 2:
milivella
Werner Pichler
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
HOWEVER, Blueshirt has expressed interest in joining the game (yay!), and
it would be about time that UPT increased its number of players again. Assuming Blueshirt confirms his participation, we would have 9 players,
which makes the scheduling a bit tricky. A number of possible solutions:
A) Three groups of three teams, round robin home and away. Four gameweeks
in total, each week three teams (one in each group) gets a bye.
A1) Same as A, but double the number of matches: Eight gameweeks in
total, each team three teams (one in each group) gets a bye.
B) Inter-tier matches! Three groups of three teams. Each team plays 4
matches against its own-tier opponents, plus two matches against a team
from one of the other tiers. We would need 7 gameweeks to accommodate
this tournament. 6 regular weeks with 4 matches each (the three
intra-tier matches, plus one inter-tier match), and one team gets a bye;
and one extra week with three matches, and three teams get a bye. I think
I have been able to design a schedule where each team plays exactly three matches at home and three matches away, and no team plays more than two consecutive matches home or away.
C) One group of 4 and one group of 5. The 4-team tier requires 6
gameweeks, but the 5 team tier requires 10 gameweeks for a full round
robin. Maybe a shortened/unbalanced schedule for the 5-team tier?
D) We recruit other players (or BOTs) to fill up the roster, so that we
have either 2 groups of 5 teams, or 3 groups of 4.
Thoughts?
Futbolmetrix <futbolmetrix@yahoo.com> wrote:
Interesting developments for season 58. If we have the same roster of
participants as in Season 57, the tiers would be:
Tier 1:
MH
The Doctor
Mark
Futbolmetrix
Tier 2:
milivella
Werner Pichler
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
HOWEVER, Blueshirt has expressed interest in joining the game (yay!), and
it would be about time that UPT increased its number of players again.
Assuming Blueshirt confirms his participation, we would have 9 players,
which makes the scheduling a bit tricky. A number of possible solutions:
A) Three groups of three teams, round robin home and away. Four gameweeks
in total, each week three teams (one in each group) gets a bye.
A1) Same as A, but double the number of matches: Eight gameweeks in
total, each team three teams (one in each group) gets a bye.
B) Inter-tier matches! Three groups of three teams. Each team plays 4
matches against its own-tier opponents, plus two matches against a team
from one of the other tiers. We would need 7 gameweeks to accommodate
this tournament. 6 regular weeks with 4 matches each (the three
intra-tier matches, plus one inter-tier match), and one team gets a bye;
and one extra week with three matches, and three teams get a bye. I think
I have been able to design a schedule where each team plays exactly three
matches at home and three matches away, and no team plays more than two
consecutive matches home or away.
C) One group of 4 and one group of 5. The 4-team tier requires 6
gameweeks, but the 5 team tier requires 10 gameweeks for a full round
robin. Maybe a shortened/unbalanced schedule for the 5-team tier?
D) We recruit other players (or BOTs) to fill up the roster, so that we
have either 2 groups of 5 teams, or 3 groups of 4.
Am I the only one to kind of miss Lassie, Homer and Betty?
Ciao,
Werner
Thoughts?
Am I the only one to kind of miss Lassie, Homer and Betty?
A) Three groups of three teams, round robin home and away.
B) Inter-tier matches!
C) One group of 4 and one group of 5.
D) We recruit other players (or BOTs) to fill up the roster,
Futbolmetrix wrote:
A) Three groups of three teams, round robin home and away. B)
Inter-tier matches! C) One group of 4 and one group of 5. D) We
recruit other players (or BOTs) to fill up the roster,
My reading of people's answers in this thread:
FM: B
milivella: D-humans, B
MH: D-humans, D-BOTs
JP: D-BOTs, D-"B teams"
Doc: A
Mark: D-humans, C
Werner, D-BOTs
D-humans seems to be the preferred outcome, but that's not feasible. So
if we exclude that, I see three votes for D-BOTs, two votes for B, and a bunch of others.
This is close enough that I will exercise my gamemaster prerogative and decide for B :-)
So, tiers for Season 58:
Tier 1: MH
The Doctor
Mark
Tier 2
Futbolmetrix
milivella
Werner Pichler
Tier 3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
I will post the schedule shortly. Games will start the weekend of April
27/28
Doc, you get to choose the leagues.
FOr variety's sake, why not have each team in tier 1 play a game against
a randomly selected team in each of tiers 2 and 3 ? Home to the tier 2
team, away to the tier 3..
That would bring it back to a six game season.
Futbolmetrix wrote:
A) Three groups of three teams, round robin home and away.
B) Inter-tier matches!
C) One group of 4 and one group of 5.
D) We recruit other players (or BOTs) to fill up the roster,
My reading of people's answers in this thread:
FM: B
milivella: D-humans, B
MH: D-humans, D-BOTs
JP: D-BOTs, D-"B teams"
Doc: A
Mark: D-humans, C
Werner, D-BOTs
D-humans seems to be the preferred outcome, but that's not feasible. So
if we exclude that, I see three votes for D-BOTs, two votes for B, and a >bunch of others.
This is close enough that I will exercise my gamemaster prerogative and >decide for B :-)
So, tiers for Season 58:
Tier 1:
MH
The Doctor
Mark
Tier 2
Futbolmetrix
milivella
Werner Pichler
Tier 3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
I will post the schedule shortly. Games will start the weekend of April 27/28
Doc, you get to choose the leagues.
In article <1ea6ccca0027f0f6f46c614c231d146e@www.novabbs.com>,
Futbolmetrix <futbolmetrix@yahoo.com> wrote:
Futbolmetrix wrote:
A) Three groups of three teams, round robin home and away.
B) Inter-tier matches!
C) One group of 4 and one group of 5.
D) We recruit other players (or BOTs) to fill up the roster,
My reading of people's answers in this thread:
FM: B
milivella: D-humans, B
MH: D-humans, D-BOTs
JP: D-BOTs, D-"B teams"
Doc: A
Mark: D-humans, C
Werner, D-BOTs
D-humans seems to be the preferred outcome, but that's not feasible. So
if we exclude that, I see three votes for D-BOTs, two votes for B, and a >>bunch of others.
This is close enough that I will exercise my gamemaster prerogative and >>decide for B :-)
So, tiers for Season 58:
Tier 1:
MH
The Doctor
Mark
Tier 2
Futbolmetrix
milivella
Werner Pichler
Tier 3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
I will post the schedule shortly. Games will start the weekend of April 27/28 >>
Doc, you get to choose the leagues.
Welcome BS!
Futbolmetrix:
So, tiers for Season 58:
Tier 1: MH
The Doctor
Mark
Tier 2
Futbolmetrix
milivella
Werner Pichler
Tier 3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
The way I did it was:
"Who will play in each tier is decided: players are assigned to tiers >scrolling down...
1. ...last season rankings, considering that 2.I > 1.III > 2.II > 1.IV,
where 1 is the higher tier, 2 the lower tier and the Roman numbers mean
the place in the tier
2. ...then, the ranking of the qualification round for the new players." >(Daniele, is upt_rules.txt in our shared folder)
I think the reasoning behind this rule was indeed to have the winner of
a tier be actually promoted in cases like this.
So the tiers would be:
1
MH
The Doctor
Futbolmetrix
2
Mark
Werner Pichler
milivella
3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
There is nothing I want less than helping Futbolmetrix vs. Mark, but I
had to say it.
(and, given the inter-tier matches, Futbolmetrix cannot even accuse me
to avoid to play him!)
--
Cheers
milivella
In article <uvne9h$1cqkh$1@dont-email.me>,
milivella <milivella@gmail.com> wrote:
So the tiers would be:
1
MH
The Doctor
Futbolmetrix
2
Mark
Werner Pichler
milivella
3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
Welcome BS
The way I did it was:
"Who will play in each tier is decided: players are assigned to tiers scrolling down...
1. ...last season rankings, considering that 2.I > 1.III > 2.II > 1.IV,
where 1 is the higher tier, 2 the lower tier and the Roman numbers mean
the place in the tier
2. ...then, the ranking of the qualification round for the new players." (Daniele, is upt_rules.txt in our shared folder)
I think the reasoning behind this rule was indeed to have the winner of
a tier be actually promoted in cases like this.
So the tiers would be:
1
MH
The Doctor
Futbolmetrix
2
Mark
Werner Pichler
milivella
3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
There is nothing I want less than helping Futbolmetrix vs. Mark, but I
had to say it.
(and, given the inter-tier matches, Futbolmetrix cannot even accuse me
to avoid to play him!)
Fair enough, we'll go with these tiers.
Futbolmetrix wrote:
Fair enough, we'll go with these tiers.
This is the schedule:
MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7
A1-A2 A2-A3 A3-A1 A1-A3 C3-A3 A2-A1 A3-A2
B1-B2 B2-B3 B3-B1 B1-B3 B1-C2 B2-B1 B3-B2
C1-C2 C3-C1 C3-C2 C2-C3 B2-A2 C2-C1 C1-C3
A3-B3 C2-A1 C1-B2 A2-C1 A1, B3, C1 bye B3-C3 A1-B1
C3 bye B1 bye A2 bye B2 bye A3 bye C2 bye
Futbolmetrix wrote:
Futbolmetrix wrote:
Fair enough, we'll go with these tiers.
This is the schedule:
MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7
A1-A2 A2-A3 A3-A1 A1-A3 C3-A3 A2-A1 A3-A2
B1-B2 B2-B3 B3-B1 B1-B3 B1-C2 B2-B1 B3-B2
C1-C2 C3-C1 C3-C2 C2-C3 B2-A2 C2-C1 C1-C3
A3-B3 C2-A1 C1-B2 A2-C1 A1, B3, C1 bye B3-C3 A1-B1
C3 bye B1 bye A2 bye B2 bye A3 bye C2 bye
and the matrix of home and away matches:
Home-Away schedule (H=1, A=0) Number of home matches >A1 1 0 0 1 . 0 1 3
A2 0 1 . 1 0 1 0 3
A3 1 0 1 0 0 . 1 3
B1 1 . 0 1 1 0 0 3
B2 0 1 0 . 1 1 0 3
B3 0 0 1 0 . 1 1 3
C1 1 0 1 0 . 0 1 3
C2 0 1 0 1 0 1 . 3
C3 . 1 1 0 1 0 0 3
milivella wrote:
The way I did it was:1.IV, where 1 is the higher tier, 2 the lower tier and the Roman
"Who will play in each tier is decided: players are assigned to
tiers scrolling down...
1. ...last season rankings, considering that 2.I > 1.III > 2.II >
numbers mean the place in the tier
2. ...then, the ranking of the qualification round for the new
players." (Daniele, is upt_rules.txt in our shared folder)
I think the reasoning behind this rule was indeed to have the
winner of a tier be actually promoted in cases like this.
Ah well, if it says so in the rules...
So the tiers would be:
1
MH
The Doctor
Futbolmetrix
2
Mark
Werner Pichler
milivella
3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
Fair enough, we'll go with these tiers.
Futbolmetrix wrote:
milivella wrote:
So the tiers would be:
1
MH
The Doctor
Futbolmetrix
2
Mark
Werner Pichler
milivella
3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
Fair enough, we'll go with these tiers.
According to the rules at the beginning of the season, 3rd
place was enough to stay in Division 1. You can't change that
after the season has finished. FC Mark have earned our place
in Tier 1.
Any changes like that should be made known before the season
starts, so we know what we're playing for from the start of
the season.
And if nothing short of finishing runners-up means avoiding
relegation, doesn't that show how bad an idea 3 teams in each
division is?
And what about all our fans who have already bought season
tickets expecting top tier teams and a chance of seeing FC
Mark win the Championship?
According to the rules at the beginning of the season, 3rd place was
enough to stay in Division 1. You can't change that after the season
has finished. FC Mark have earned our place in Tier 1.
Mark:
Futbolmetrix wrote:
milivella wrote:
The way I did it was:1.IV, where 1 is the higher tier, 2 the lower tier and the Roman
"Who will play in each tier is decided: players are assigned to
tiers scrolling down...
1. ...last season rankings, considering that 2.I > 1.III > 2.II >
numbers mean the place in the tier
2. ...then, the ranking of the qualification round for the new players." (Daniele, is upt_rules.txt in our shared folder)
I think the reasoning behind this rule was indeed to have the
winner of a tier be actually promoted in cases like this.
Ah well, if it says so in the rules...
So the tiers would be:
1
MH
The Doctor
Futbolmetrix
2
Mark
Werner Pichler
milivella
3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
Fair enough, we'll go with these tiers.
According to the rules at the beginning of the season, 3rd place was
enough to stay in Division 1. You can't change that after the season
has finished. FC Mark have earned our place in Tier 1.
Any changes like that should be made known before the season
starts, so we know what we're playing for from the start of the
season.
This is not a change of the rules, as they have been this way since
literally before the game started: https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.soccer/c/itNFWMnGJ7k/m/abpP27cF-
PoJ Of course this does not mean that every player was aware of this
corner case, which would have been desirable. :(
And if nothing short of finishing runners-up means avoiding
relegation, doesn't that show how bad an idea 3 teams in each
division is?
It makes sense. However, 1st not being promoted is worse than 3rd out
of 4 being relegated.
And what about all our fans who have already bought season tickets expecting top tier teams and a chance of seeing FC Mark win the Championship?
I guess the gamemaster will have to reimburse them?
Again, I would do anything rather than favoring Futbolmetrix over
you, but my evi... I mean, my integrity as a gamemaster forces me.
Mark:
milivella wrote:
Mark:
Futbolmetrix wrote:
milivella wrote:
The way I did it was:1.IV, where 1 is the higher tier, 2 the lower tier and the
"Who will play in each tier is decided: players are
assigned to tiers scrolling down...
1. ...last season rankings, considering that 2.I > 1.III > 2.II >
Roman numbers mean the place in the tier
2. ...then, the ranking of the qualification round for the
new players." (Daniele, is upt_rules.txt in our shared
folder)
I think the reasoning behind this rule was indeed to have
the winner of a tier be actually promoted in cases like
this.
Ah well, if it says so in the rules...
So the tiers would be:
1
MH
The Doctor
Futbolmetrix
2
Mark
Werner Pichler
milivella
3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
Fair enough, we'll go with these tiers.
According to the rules at the beginning of the season, 3rd
place was enough to stay in Division 1. You can't change that
after the season has finished. FC Mark have earned our place in
Tier 1.
Any changes like that should be made known before the season
starts, so we know what we're playing for from the start of the
season.
This is not a change of the rules, as they have been this way
since literally before the game started:
PoJ Of course this does not mean that every player was aware of
this corner case, which would have been desirable. :(
The rules say that there are 4 teams in each tier, so it is a
change in the rules.
Nah, we have had 3 team tiers in the past. Even the link I posted
refers to 3- and 2-team tiers.
And what it says in that link is referring to a team leaving
the League, not a restructuring of the League.
That is clearly marked as an example ("e.g.").
And it also assumes 4
teams in each Division.
No, it is four in all tiers "bar eventually the bottom two".
Anyway, we just voted about changing the number of teams in each tier.
And what about all our fans who have already bought season
tickets expecting top tier teams and a chance of seeing FC Mark
win the Championship?
I guess the gamemaster will have to reimburse them?
If that happens I'll consider abandoning any plans to take this to
the Court of arbitration for sport.
I want to see the trial of the century!
milivella wrote:
Mark:
milivella wrote:
Mark:
Futbolmetrix wrote:
milivella wrote:
2.II >The way I did it was:
"Who will play in each tier is decided: players are
assigned to tiers scrolling down...
1. ...last season rankings, considering that 2.I > 1.III >
1.IV, where 1 is the higher tier, 2 the lower tier and the
Roman numbers mean the place in the tier
2. ...then, the ranking of the qualification round for the
new players." (Daniele, is upt_rules.txt in our shared
folder)
I think the reasoning behind this rule was indeed to have
the winner of a tier be actually promoted in cases like
this.
Ah well, if it says so in the rules...
So the tiers would be:
1
MH
The Doctor
Futbolmetrix
2
Mark
Werner Pichler
milivella
3
Jesper Lauridsen
Jesus Petry
Blueshirt
Fair enough, we'll go with these tiers.
According to the rules at the beginning of the season, 3rd
place was enough to stay in Division 1. You can't change that
after the season has finished. FC Mark have earned our place
in Tier 1.
Any changes like that should be made known before the season
starts, so we know what we're playing for from the start of
the season.
This is not a change of the rules, as they have been this way
since literally before the game started:
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.soccer/c/itNFWMnGJ7k/m/abpP27cF-
PoJ Of course this does not mean that every player was aware of
this corner case, which would have been desirable. :(
The rules say that there are 4 teams in each tier, so it is a
change in the rules.
Nah, we have had 3 team tiers in the past. Even the link I posted
refers to 3- and 2-team tiers.
I don't remember ever having had 3 team tiers. When was that?
And what it says in that link is referring to a team leaving
the League, not a restructuring of the League.
That is clearly marked as an example ("e.g.").
And it also assumes 4
teams in each Division.
No, it is four in all tiers "bar eventually the bottom two".
Well, tier 1 isn't one of the bottom 2.
Anyway, we just voted about changing the number of teams in each
tier.
And option B did not get the most votes.
And what about all our fans who have already bought season
tickets expecting top tier teams and a chance of seeing FC
Mark win the Championship?
I guess the gamemaster will have to reimburse them?
If that happens I'll consider abandoning any plans to take this to
the Court of arbitration for sport.
I want to see the trial of the century!
This needs sorting out now, before the season continues, otherwise it
will happen. What's the CAS's e-mail address?
Can we have the rules changed back to what they were last season
please? Ie 4 teams in each tier, with the top 3 staying in Tier 1.
Otherwise FC Mark are going to consider boycotting the inter-tier
matches or something.
Mark wrote:
Can we have the rules changed back to what they were last
season please? Ie 4 teams in each tier, with the top 3
staying in Tier 1. Otherwise FC Mark are going to consider
boycotting the inter-tier matches or something.
Sorry, we won't be changing the rules for this season. I know
it is a bit unfair to you, but but somebody has to get the
short end of the stick. Maybe be could try to give this
inter-tier setup a chance?
I hope you don't boycott it.
Futbolmetrix wrote:
Mark wrote:
Can we have the rules changed back to what they were last
season please? Ie 4 teams in each tier, with the top 3
staying in Tier 1. Otherwise FC Mark are going to consider
boycotting the inter-tier matches or something.
Sorry, we won't be changing the rules for this season. I know
it is a bit unfair to you, but but somebody has to get the
short end of the stick. Maybe be could try to give this
inter-tier setup a chance?
I hope you don't boycott it.
If my participation in Season 58 is causing an unfair situation
for other players, players who have played for years, I will
drop out.
Futbolmetrix wrote:
Mark wrote:
Can we have the rules changed back to what they were last
season please? Ie 4 teams in each tier, with the top 3
staying in Tier 1. Otherwise FC Mark are going to consider
boycotting the inter-tier matches or something.
Sorry, we won't be changing the rules for this season. I know
it is a bit unfair to you, but but somebody has to get the
short end of the stick. Maybe be could try to give this
inter-tier setup a chance?
I hope you don't boycott it.
If my participation in Season 58 is causing an unfair situation
for other players, players who have played for years, I will
drop out.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 42:42:49 |
| Calls: | 6,708 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,243 |
| Messages: | 5,353,935 |