Saturday 10th June, Kickoff 8pm GMT, 9pm CET
Ataturk Olympic Stadium, Istanbul (capacity 74753)
Inter won the European Cup in 1964 and 1965, and the Champions League
in 2010. They also won the UEFA Cup in 1991, 1994 and 1998.
In contrast Manchester City's European trophy cabinet has a lot of
empty space, with the 1970 Cup Winners' Cup being the only European
trophy to their name.
However, despite Inter being way ahead in terms of European trophies
won, Manchester City go into this game as favourites. They've been
knocking on the door for a while now, and came close in 2021
(finalists) and 2022 (semi finalists).
Will Manchester City win their first Champions League and make it two
out of two for the Premier League in this year's European finals?
Or will Inter upset the odds and win their fourth European Cup and
give Serie A a boost after defeats for Roma and Fiorentina in this
year's other European finals?
We'll find out on Saturday!
Saturday 10th June, Kickoff 8pm GMT, 9pm CET
Ataturk Olympic Stadium, Istanbul (capacity 74753)
On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 6:23:09 PM UTC-4, Real Mardin wrote:
Saturday 10th June, Kickoff 8pm GMT, 9pm CET
Ataturk Olympic Stadium, Istanbul (capacity 74753)Some interesting quotes in this article by some dude who spends some of his free time trying to predict the outcome of soccer tournaments:
https://www.espn.com/soccer/insider/insider/story/_/id/37814446/are-inter-milan-big-underdog-vs-manchester-city-champions-league-final
What is the Rooting Ratio for non-Citizens/non-Interistas?
City 1:99 Inter
--
Manchester United FC - CHAMPIONS
Latest: England '13 (20th) Europa '17, UEFA '08, World '08
What is the Rooting Ratio for non-Citizens/non-Interistas?
City 1:99 Inter?
On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 6:23:09 PM UTC-4, Real Mardin wrote:
Saturday 10th June, Kickoff 8pm GMT, 9pm CET
Ataturk Olympic Stadium, Istanbul (capacity 74753)
Some interesting quotes in this article by some dude who spends some of
his free time trying to predict the outcome of soccer tournaments:
https://www.espn.com/soccer/insider/insider/story/_/id/37814446/are-inter-milan-big-underdog-vs-manchester-city-champions-league-final
What is the Rooting Ratio for non-Citizens/non-Interistas?
City 1:99 Inter
Saturday 10th June, Kickoff 8pm GMT, 9pm CET
Ataturk Olympic Stadium, Istanbul (capacity 74753)
Inter won the European Cup in 1964 and 1965, and the Champions League in 2010. They also won the UEFA Cup in 1991, 1994 and 1998.
In contrast Manchester City's European trophy cabinet has a lot of empty space, with the 1970 Cup Winners' Cup being the only European trophy to their name.
However, despite Inter being way ahead in terms of European trophies won, Manchester City go into this game as favourites. They've been knocking on the door for a while now, and came close in 2021 (finalists) and 2022 (semi finalists).
Will Manchester City win their first Champions League and make it two out of two for the Premier League in this year's European finals?
Or will Inter upset the odds and win their fourth European Cup and give Serie A a boost after defeats for Roma and Fiorentina in this year's other European finals?
We'll find out on Saturday!
RM
I think Inter probably would be better off by not showing up. :) 0 - 3 is not such a bad scoreline after all.
Quoting anders t in rec.sport.soccer:
What is the Rooting Ratio for non-Citizens/non-Interistas?
City 1:99 Inter?
On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 11:35:18 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
I think Inter probably would be better off by not showing up. :) 0 - 3 is not such a bad scoreline after all.I very much hope that this won't be Guardiola's mindset.
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easily
lose to Inter.
On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 4:48:31?PM UTC-4, anders t wrote:
Quoting anders t in rec.sport.soccer:
What is the Rooting Ratio for non-Citizens/non-Interistas?
City 1:99 Inter?
You mean excluding Liverpool/Manchester United/Arsenal(?)/Juventus/Milan fans?
I would guess that in Italy, excluding Milan and Juve fans, maybe 50-60% would support Inter. Because City have been more dominant in England, I would guess that the fraction of non Liverpool/non-ManU fans supporting City would be more like 30-40%
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
Revised sophisticated prediction:
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictions
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
Revised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City more
prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him might
Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City more
prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him might
Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
1-0 City.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City more
As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him mightprove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).
Let's see what the second half will bring.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City more
prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him might
Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
1-0 City.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:39 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City more
prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).
As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him might
Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
Let's see what the second half will bring.
1-0 City.
RM
Inter had a corner in the last seconds of injury time, but the resulting header was just palmed off the line by Ederson to deny what would have been a last second equaliser.
FT: Manchester City 1 - Internazionale 0
Manchester City win the Champions League and complete a treble of competition wins this season.
RM
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:29:19 PM UTC+1, FF wrote:more dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City
might prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him
Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
1-0 City.
RM
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:39 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:more dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:29:19 PM UTC+1, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City
might prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him
Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
1-0 City.
RMInter had a corner in the last seconds of injury time, but the resulting header was just palmed off the line by Ederson to deny what would have been a last second equaliser.
FT: Manchester City 1 - Internazionale 0
Manchester City win the Champions League and complete a treble of competition wins this season.
RM
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:39 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:more dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:29:19 PM UTC+1, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City
might prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him
Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
1-0 City.
RMInter had a corner in the last seconds of injury time, but the resulting header was just palmed off the line by Ederson to deny what would have been a last second equaliser.
FT: Manchester City 1 - Internazionale 0
Manchester City win the Champions League and complete a treble of competition wins this season.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:29:19 PM UTC+1, FF wrote:more dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City
might prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him
Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
1-0 City.
Nonetheless, let us take inspiration from Manchester City finally
winning the Champions League. They've shown us tonight that if you
spend, spend, spend, and spend just a bit more...................then
one day you can achieve your dreams.
On 2023-06-10 15:04, Real Mardin wrote:more dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:39 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City
might prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).
As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him
Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
Let's see what the second half will bring.
1-0 City.
RM
Inter had a corner in the last seconds of injury time, but the resulting header was just palmed off the line by Ederson to deny what would have been a last second equaliser.
FT: Manchester City 1 - Internazionale 0
Manchester City win the Champions League and complete a treble of competition wins this season.This was a pretty terrible, error strewn match.
Quoting anders t in rec.sport.soccer:
I've at least just ensured that Man City won't win at regulation time, by >putting all my (betting account balance) money on them winning at full >time.Thought I had a watertight woff there, but no.
Oh well, so maybe I overrated Inter a little bit. Even though they
had two massive chances to equalize, but it wasn't Lukaku's day.
Nonetheless, let us take inspiration from Manchester City finally winning the Champions League. They've shown us tonight that if you spend, spend, spend, and spend just a bit more...................then one day you can achieve your dreams.
Futbolmetrix wrote:
Oh well, so maybe I overrated Inter a little bit. Even though theyLukaku? If you're not going to bury THAT header you might as well give
had two massive chances to equalize, but it wasn't Lukaku's day.
up!
Please, let him stay at Inter!!!
I've at least just ensured that Man City won't win at regulation time, by >putting all my (betting account balance) money on them winning at full
time.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:39 PM UTC+1, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:29:19 PM UTC+1, FF wrote:Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote: >> > > > > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4,
easilyOn Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, >Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, >Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and >Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can
(*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:lose to Inter.Maybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx
surprised if it happens this time.(:-)))))) Yeah right.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
Revised sophisticated prediction:
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very
went too low with my predictionsInter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I
Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated
ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.HT 0-0
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and
by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when theMuch more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot
City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to
capitalise on it, but it went far away. City more dominant, had a few
more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail
As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be
it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be
subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him might prove costly.
Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4
cards would have been in order (one of them for City).
a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn'tWay too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus
Let's see what the second half will bring.
do them against Real.
to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end >Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances
1-0 City.
RM
Inter had a corner in the last seconds of injury time, but the resulting >header was just palmed off the line by Ederson to deny what would have
been a last second equaliser.
FT: Manchester City 1 - Internazionale 0
Manchester City win the Champions League and complete a treble of
competition wins this season.
RM
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:34:12?AM UTC+3, anders t wrote:
Quoting anders t in rec.sport.soccer:
I've at least just ensured that Man City won't win at regulation time, by >> >putting all my (betting account balance) money on them winning at fullThought I had a watertight woff there, but no.
time.
But then you just got richer. But not by much I imagine.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:34:39 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:more dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:29:19 PM UTC+1, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City
might prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him
point it even looked doubtful.And it's final. 1-0 City.Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
1-0 City.
Triumph of Pep.
In the end the gulf in class wasn't that big but City won't mind. They got what they wanted. But I have to say, they didn't play nearly as well as against Madrid. Maybe it was Inter's defense too but they did many more mistakes themselves. At some
Inter worthy adversaries nevertheless.
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:53:32 PM UTC+3, Al Kamista wrote:City more dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 5:09:48 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:34:39 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:29:19 PM UTC+1, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away.
him might prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing
point it even looked doubtful.And it's final. 1-0 City.Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
1-0 City.
Triumph of Pep.
In the end the gulf in class wasn't that big but City won't mind. They got what they wanted. But I have to say, they didn't play nearly as well as against Madrid. Maybe it was Inter's defense too but they did many more mistakes themselves. At some
season.I think it's mostly City's fault. Their game was full of errors. If they had played like this against Real I suspect it would still have been 4-0, but the other way around. :) Luckily for them they met a team they could still beat, even in this form.Inter worthy adversaries nevertheless.Inter gave an excellent account of themselves. Not because of the big chances they had at the end, which came about by throwing the kitchen sink at City, but by denying City the ability to play their game pretty much most of the game.
As for City, they looked as flat as they did against United in the FA Cup final. Almost makes me wonder if it isn't just physical and mental exhaustion catching up with them, just like it did with Liverpool at this stage of the quadruple quest last
My guess is they had a UCL-winning complex. Fortunately, they met a team some distance below them and could finally win it, so they probably got rid of it. We'll see in coming years.
True words from Twitter.
"
It took Manchester United 13 years of hard work and wise decisions under
Sir Alex Ferguson to win the treble.
It took Manchester City 15 years of financial doping and cheating to
achieve the same thing.
That's why yesterday meant nothing to football history.
"
https://twitter.com/MussGustav/status/1667788902415908865
--
Manchester United FC - CHAMPIONS
Latest: England '13 (20th) Europa '17, UEFA '08, World '08
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 5:09:48 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:more dominant, had a few more half-chances but nothing very dangerous.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:34:39 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:29:19 PM UTC+1, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:24:14 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 11:07:55 PM UTC+3, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 10:51:02 PM UTC+3, Real Mardin wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:40:40 PM UTC+1, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-4, FF wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 7:19:20 PM UTC+3, Futbolmetrix wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:34:20 AM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
City have lost matches this year to Brentford and Tottenham (teams that, like Inter, use a 5-3-2 formation), they can easilyMaybe I said this partially as an anti-weaufx (*maybe*!), but there is apparently some truth to this:
lose to Inter.
https://twitter.com/BassTunedToRed/status/1667457203672866818?s=20
City's expected goals for and against
vs teams playing with 4 at the back: 2.33-0.88
vs teams playing with 3 at the back: 1.63 - 1.29
HT 0-0De Bruyne out injured in the 35th minute. Updated Sophisticated predictions: Inter 75%, City 25%Inter easily the better team in the first 15 minutes. I went too low with my predictionsRevised sophisticated prediction:(:-)))))) Yeah right.
Man City 40%, Inter 60%
Of course, surprises do happen, but I'll be very surprised if it happens this time.
The best thing about the first half was the Paramount + and ebay sponsorship on Inter’s shirt.Much more balanced than expected.
Both teams had one good chance each, I'd say. There was a shot by Haaland that could have been better, and there was a moment when the City keeper was way out and an italian noticed it and tried to capitalise on it, but it went far away. City
might prove costly. Anyway, so far there didn't seem to be excessive hacking. Though 3-4 cards would have been in order (one of them for City).As for the hacking, Inter did some, didn't appear to be excessive but I have the feeling that if I looked at it in more detail it would be more. Whatever. I didn't quite get it why KDB had to be subbed, didn't show anything on TV. Losing him
point it even looked doubtful.And it's final. 1-0 City.Rodri puts Man City 1-0 up after 68 minutes, then at the other end Brozovic’s header hits the crossbar. Inter have wasted a few chances to score tonight.Finally some dangerous play in Inter's box.Let's see what the second half will bring.Way too many mistakes by City. In good offensive positions. (Plus a horrible defensive blunder that almost cost them a goal.) They didn't do them against Real.
1-0 City.
Triumph of Pep.
In the end the gulf in class wasn't that big but City won't mind. They got what they wanted. But I have to say, they didn't play nearly as well as against Madrid. Maybe it was Inter's defense too but they did many more mistakes themselves. At some
Inter worthy adversaries nevertheless.Inter gave an excellent account of themselves. Not because of the big chances they had at the end, which came about by throwing the kitchen sink at City, but by denying City the ability to play their game pretty much most of the game.
As for City, they looked as flat as they did against United in the FA Cup final. Almost makes me wonder if it isn't just physical and mental exhaustion catching up with them, just like it did with Liverpool at this stage of the quadruple quest lastseason.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 48:42:13 |
| Calls: | 6,710 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,243 |
| Messages: | 5,354,642 |
| Posted today: | 1 |