• [WB4SON] Owning a Flex-6600M is a mixed bag

    From WB4SON via rec.radio.amateur.modera@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 10 13:37:52 2021
    XPost: rec.radio.amateur.moderated

    WB4SON

    ///////////////////////////////////////////
    Owning a Flex-6600M is a mixed bag

    Posted: 10 Jun 2021 09:57 AM PDT
    https://wb4son.com/wpblog/?p=4429


    A lifetime ago (in other words the year before the pandemic,), I purchased
    a FlexRadio Flex-6600M, along with a Maestro Control Console for remote operation.  My first year of use was plagued with problems with things that seemed basic to me; like the internal tuner simply didnt work (refused to
    find solutions to situations that presented a 3:1 SWR).  The software was flaky, often requiring cold boots, and it corrupted an internal flash card several times.  While certain parts of the radio fascinated me, it was so frustrating to use that I left it unused almost a year.  That was very disappointing, as it was the only radio I was aware of that allowed for
    remote CW (although CW on a Flex is VERY glitchy).

    A couple of months ago, Flex introduced a new firmware upgrade that fixed
    the tuner issue (after a year of complaints).  It now works flawlessly, and appears to handle a 10:1 situation.  In many ways, the radio seemed more stable, but after a few weeks of operation the radio would refuse to work
    on power-up.  Flex service responded, saying the radio needed a cold reset
    (a rather long process).  That restored operation, but it would fail again after a few days.  A promised firmware update fixed that issue, and
    introduced other problems, which is typical of FlexRadio a fix often
    results in other broken things.

    So here is my dilemma, I really like the Flex6600M it is a fantastically versatile receiver (multi-receiver, actually), and it has the best Noise Reduction Ive ever used on 80 meters.  I love being able to use it from an iPad or iPhone, remotely.  And important to me, it is the only radio that I know of that allows for remote CW operation (my Yaesu FTDX-101MP with LAN adapter does not).  However, Flex software updates tend to be buggy, and it appears that no one who understands a CW operator was involved in the development of the software (no ability to adjust weight, for example, and missing or shortened elements while in break-in).

    The latest software update, to fix some latency issues, and hopefully to resolve the need for cold-resets, dropped a couple days ago.  Updating the Flex6600M was fairly simple.  Updating the remote Maestro Control Console
    was a major pain in the backside.  The process took over four hours and requited user responses at least three of the times it applied a partial update.  Flex blames it on Microsoft.  That may be true, but sounds more
    like a poor design choice up front to me.



    I still love it, and use it every week to participate in a late night CW contest.  Like many things in life, it is a mix of good and bad.  I just
    with FlexRadio would get serious about their software development, and get
    it to the point where it was two steps forward and zero steps back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wicklowham@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 11 06:51:56 2021
    XPost: rec.radio.amateur.moderated

    On 10/06/2021 18:37, WB4SON via rec.radio.amateur.moderated Admin wrote:

    WB4SON

    ///////////////////////////////////////////
    Owning a Flex-6600M is a mixed bag

    Posted: 10 Jun 2021 09:57 AM PDT
    https://wb4son.com/wpblog/?p=4429


    A lifetime ago (in other words the year before the pandemic,), I
    purchased a FlexRadio Flex-6600M, along with a Maestro Control Console
    for remote operation.  My first year of use was plagued with problems
    with things that seemed basic to me; like the internal tuner simply
    didnt work (refused to find solutions to situations that presented a 3:1 SWR).  The software was flaky, often requiring cold boots, and it
    corrupted an internal flash card several times.  While certain parts of
    the radio fascinated me, it was so frustrating to use that I left it
    unused almost a year.  That was very disappointing, as it was the only
    radio I was aware of that allowed for remote CW (although CW on a Flex
    is VERY glitchy).

    A couple of months ago, Flex introduced a new firmware upgrade that
    fixed the tuner issue (after a year of complaints).  It now works flawlessly, and appears to handle a 10:1 situation.  In many ways, the
    radio seemed more stable, but after a few weeks of operation the radio
    would refuse to work on power-up.  Flex service responded, saying the
    radio needed a cold reset (a rather long process).  That restored
    operation, but it would fail again after a few days.  A promised
    firmware update fixed that issue, and introduced other problems, which
    is typical of FlexRadio  a fix often results in other broken things.

    So here is my dilemma, I really like the Flex6600M  it is a
    fantastically versatile receiver (multi-receiver, actually), and it has
    the best Noise Reduction Ive ever used on 80 meters.  I love being able
    to use it from an iPad or iPhone, remotely.  And important to me, it is
    the only radio that I know of that allows for remote CW operation (my
    Yaesu FTDX-101MP with LAN adapter does not).  However, Flex software
    updates tend to be buggy, and it appears that no one who understands a
    CW operator was involved in the development of the software (no ability
    to adjust weight, for example, and missing or shortened elements while
    in break-in).

    The latest software update, to fix some latency issues, and hopefully to resolve the need for cold-resets, dropped a couple days ago.  Updating
    the Flex6600M was fairly simple.  Updating the remote Maestro Control Console was a major pain in the backside.  The process took over four
    hours and requited user responses at least three of the times it applied
    a partial update.  Flex blames it on Microsoft.  That may be true, but sounds more like a poor design choice up front to me.



    I still love it, and use it every week to participate in a late night CW contest.  Like many things in life, it is a mix of good and bad.  I just with FlexRadio would get serious about their software development, and
    get it to the point where it was two steps forward and zero steps back.


    Question from a Linux only user : Is there any Linux software to
    operate the FLEX-6600M ?
    If not ,it is a pity that most manufactured SDR equipment only works
    with proprietory software.

    Frank , EI7KS

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)