• C. S. Lewis recommends (defends) [chastity]

    From HenHanna@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 18 12:34:38 2024
    XPost: sci.lang, alt.usage.english

    i suppose... the word [chastity] is still used today in Am.English
    the same way C.S.Lewis used it here.


    ————————————— from C.S.Lewis, [Mere Christianity] (1952 ?)


    People often misunderstand what psychology teaches about
    ‘repressions’. It teaches us that ‘repressed’ sex is dangerous.

    But ‘repressed’ is here a technical term: it does not mean ‘suppressed’ in the sense of ‘denied’ or ‘resisted’.

    A repressed desire or thought is one which has been thrust into the subconscious (usually at a very early age) and can now come before the
    mind only in a disguised and unrecognisable form.

    Repressed sexuality does not appear to the patient to be sexuality at
    all. When an adolescent or an adult is engaged in resisting a conscious
    desire, he is not dealing with a repression nor is he in the least
    danger of creating a repression.

    On the contrary, those who are seriously attempting chastity are more conscious, and soon know a great deal more about their own sexuality
    than anyone else.

    They come to know their desires as Wellington knew Napoleon, or as
    Sherlock Holmes knew Moriarty; as a rat-catcher knows rats or a
    plumber knows about leaky pipes.

    Virtue ———even attempted virtue——— brings light; indulgence brings fog.


    ————————————— from C.S.Lewis, [Mere Christianity] (1952 ?)


    obPuzzle -- Could he have used better analogy ... than ... comparing
    sex to Moriarty, rats, and leaky pipes?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HenHanna@21:1/5 to HenHanna on Fri Apr 19 19:24:57 2024
    XPost: sci.lang, alt.usage.english

    On 4/18/2024 12:34 PM, HenHanna wrote:

    i suppose...  the word [chastity]  is still used today in Am.English
    the same way C.S.Lewis used it here.


            —————————————   from  C.S.Lewis, [Mere Christianity] (1952 ?)


     People often misunderstand what psychology teaches about ‘repressions’. It teaches us that ‘repressed’ sex is dangerous.

    But ‘repressed’ is here a technical term:     it does not mean ‘suppressed’ in the sense of ‘denied’ or ‘resisted’.

    A repressed desire or thought is one which has been thrust into the subconscious (usually at a very early age) and can now come before the
    mind only in a disguised and unrecognisable form.

    Repressed sexuality does not appear to the patient to be sexuality at
    all. When an adolescent or an adult is engaged in resisting a conscious desire, he is not dealing with a repression nor is he in the least
    danger of creating a repression.

    On the contrary, those who are seriously attempting chastity are more conscious, and soon know a great deal more about their own sexuality
    than anyone else.

    They come to know their desires as    Wellington knew Napoleon, or as Sherlock Holmes knew Moriarty;   as a rat-catcher knows rats or a
    plumber knows about leaky pipes.

    Virtue  ———even attempted virtue——— brings light; indulgence brings fog.


               —————————————   from  C.S.Lewis, [Mere Christianity] (1952 ?)


    obPuzzle -- Could he have used better analogy  ... than ... comparing
                               sex to  Moriarty, rats, and leaky pipes?


    ______________________________

    Saving yourself for marriage – modern chastity movements

    https://www.sister-mag.com
    Mar 27, 2019 — Generally, it can be doubted
    that being part of a chastity movement prevents young people from having
    sexual intercourse before marriage. In ...


    ______________________________

    How an Abstinence Pledge in the '90s Shamed a ...

    The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com › 2021/04/06
    — The Christian “purity” movement promoted a strict view of abstinence before marriage. But two decades later, some followers are
    grappling ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)