• Word arithmetic : (CARL * R) + GINNOW = COINER

    From James Dow Allen@21:1/5 to Carl G. on Sun Jun 28 02:17:21 2020
    Recently, champion puzzler Carl G. posted a cryptic message in rec.puzzles:
    testit.

    Dammit, I'm a coder not a mind-reader! What are you testing?

    Given that
    (a) Carl frequently posted word problems,
    (b) He is an excellent COINER of all sorts of puzzles, and
    (c) His surname might be Ginnow
    ... I'm going to guess that he's testing whether rec.puzzles
    is still capable of designing word arithmetic puzzles, with
    unique solutions. I think we are:

    (CARL * R) + GINNOW = COINER

    Since Carl may be trying to ATTRACT interest in rec.p,
    I'll submit another, which may be rather easy.
    (CARL * R) + GINNOW = ATTRACT

    I hope others also post word arithmetic puzzles -- I'd like
    to show off my own! :-)


    But again, I'm not a mind-reader. Perhaps Carl is annoyed
    that nobody has responded to some of his puzzles,
    e.g. "Resistance is Futile":

    On Monday, July 10, 2000 at 2:00:00 PM UTC+7, Carl G. wrote:
    You have a set of ten very precise resistors (assume that they have an exact resistance value). The resistors can be used individually, in parallel, or in series. The resistance of two resistors in series is given by the sum of the two resistances ( = r1+r2). The resistance of two resistors in parallel is given by the reciprocal of the sum of the reciprocals of the two resistances (= 1 / (1/r1 + 1/r2)). Find the set of ten resistors that forms the largest contiguous range of integral resistances, starting at 1 (in ohms)?

    For example: The set of ten resistors: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256,
    and 512 ohms, could form all of the resistances from 1 to 1023 by only using them in series (just convert the desired resistance value into binary and
    use the resistors that correspond to each non-zero bit). Can you get a larger range by also using your set in parallel?

    Can you find a larger contiguous range of integral resistances if you don't have to start at 1 ohm?

    Carl G.

    "Doing things in series may have serious consequences, but doing things in parallel may have perilous consequences." - C. Ginnow

    My excuse is that I was AWOL from rec,puzzles in 2000.
    I'll to look into this puzzle tomorrow.

    James Dow Allen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Murphy@21:1/5 to James Dow Allen on Sun Jun 28 10:08:27 2020
    On 6/28/2020 2:17 AM, James Dow Allen wrote:

    Recently, champion puzzler Carl G. posted a cryptic message in rec.puzzles:
    testit.

    Dammit, I'm a coder not a mind-reader! What are you testing?

    Given that
    (a) Carl frequently posted word problems,
    (b) He is an excellent COINER of all sorts of puzzles, and
    (c) His surname might be Ginnow
    ... I'm going to guess that he's testing whether rec.puzzles
    is still capable of designing word arithmetic puzzles, with
    unique solutions. I think we are:

    (CARL * R) + GINNOW = COINER

    Partial solution:

    This includes all ten digits (ACEGILNORW).

    CARL * R <= 9999 * 9 = 89991, so:
    C = G + 1
    O < I
    E > O

    Also, if CARL * R <= 9999, then I < N, but also I = 9 and O = 0 (contradiction). So R > 1.

    (L * R) + W = R mod 10
    (L * R) = R - W (non-zero) mod 10
    so L != 0, R != 0, and we can also rule out
    (L = 2, R = 5)
    and
    (L = 5, R = 2)

    Since Carl may be trying to ATTRACT interest in rec.p,
    I'll submit another, which may be rather easy.
    (CARL * R) + GINNOW = ATTRACT

    Partial solution:

    This includes all ten digits (ACGILNORTW).

    Again, CARL * R is at most 5 digits, so:

    ?????
    + GINNOW
    -------
    ATTRACT

    so A = 1, G = 9, T = 0.

    CARL * R must be five digits, otherwise we would also get I = 9.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ilan Mayer@21:1/5 to James Dow Allen on Sun Jun 28 10:39:49 2020
    On Sunday, 28 June 2020 05:17:23 UTC-4, James Dow Allen wrote:
    Recently, champion puzzler Carl G. posted a cryptic message in rec.puzzles: >> testit.

    Dammit, I'm a coder not a mind-reader! What are you testing?

    Given that
    (a) Carl frequently posted word problems,
    (b) He is an excellent COINER of all sorts of puzzles, and
    (c) His surname might be Ginnow
    ... I'm going to guess that he's testing whether rec.puzzles
    is still capable of designing word arithmetic puzzles, with
    unique solutions. I think we are:

    (CARL * R) + GINNOW = COINER

    Since Carl may be trying to ATTRACT interest in rec.p,
    I'll submit another, which may be rather easy.
    (CARL * R) + GINNOW = ATTRACT

    I hope others also post word arithmetic puzzles -- I'd like
    to show off my own! :-)


    But again, I'm not a mind-reader. Perhaps Carl is annoyed
    that nobody has responded to some of his puzzles,
    e.g. "Resistance is Futile":

    On Monday, July 10, 2000 at 2:00:00 PM UTC+7, Carl G. wrote:
    You have a set of ten very precise resistors (assume that they have an exact
    resistance value). The resistors can be used individually, in parallel, or in series. The resistance of two resistors in series is given by the sum of
    the two resistances ( = r1+r2). The resistance of two resistors in parallel
    is given by the reciprocal of the sum of the reciprocals of the two resistances (= 1 / (1/r1 + 1/r2)). Find the set of ten resistors that forms
    the largest contiguous range of integral resistances, starting at 1 (in ohms)?

    For example: The set of ten resistors: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512 ohms, could form all of the resistances from 1 to 1023 by only using
    them in series (just convert the desired resistance value into binary and use the resistors that correspond to each non-zero bit). Can you get a larger range by also using your set in parallel?

    Can you find a larger contiguous range of integral resistances if you don't have to start at 1 ohm?

    Carl G.

    "Doing things in series may have serious consequences, but doing things in parallel may have perilous consequences." - C. Ginnow

    My excuse is that I was AWOL from rec,puzzles in 2000.
    I'll to look into this puzzle tomorrow.

    James Dow Allen

    SPOILER
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    ( CARL * R ) + GINNOW = COINER -> ( 7891 * 9 ) + 654420 = 725439
    ( CARL * R ) + GINNOW = ATTRACT -> ( 5136 * 3 ) + 987742 = 1003150



    Please reply to ilan dot mayer at hotmail dot com

    __/\__
    \ /
    __/\\ //\__ Ilan Mayer
    \ /
    /__ __\ Toronto, Canada
    /__ __\
    ||

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Dow Allen@21:1/5 to Ilan Mayer on Sun Jun 28 12:38:11 2020
    On Monday, June 29, 2020 at 12:39:51 AM UTC+7, Ilan Mayer wrote:
    On Sunday, 28 June 2020 05:17:23 UTC-4, James Dow Allen wrote:
    Recently, champion puzzler Carl G. posted a cryptic message in rec.puzzles: >> testit.
    [et cetera]

    ( CARL * R ) + GINNOW = COINER -> ( 7891 * 9 ) + 654420 = 725439
    ( CARL * R ) + GINNOW = ATTRACT -> ( 5136 * 3 ) + 987742 = 1003150


    ILAN x MAYER = EXEMPLAR

    BRAINY + ILAN + MAYER = MARVEL


    James

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Dow Allen@21:1/5 to James Dow Allen on Mon Jun 29 07:53:48 2020
    On Monday, June 29, 2020 at 2:38:13 AM UTC+7, James Dow Allen wrote:
    On Monday, June 29, 2020 at 12:39:51 AM UTC+7, Ilan Mayer wrote:
    On Sunday, 28 June 2020 05:17:23 UTC-4, James Dow Allen wrote:
    Recently, champion puzzler Carl G. posted a cryptic message in rec.puzzles:
    testit.
    [et cetera]

    ( CARL * R ) + GINNOW = COINER -> ( 7891 * 9 ) + 654420 = 725439
    ( CARL * R ) + GINNOW = ATTRACT -> ( 5136 * 3 ) + 987742 = 1003150

    ILAN x MAYER = EXEMPLAR

    BRAINY + ILAN + MAYER = MARVEL


    I'm disappointed nobody but Edward Murphy and Ilan Mayer
    have joined in the fun. But I won't give up yet.
    Now is the season for campaign mottoes. Wouldn't it add to
    the fun if such mottoes had to be valid base-10 word arithmetic
    puzzles with unique solutions? Here's one for the incumbent:

    MAKE x AMERIKA = INEPT x AGAIN

    It will be easier to make a motto for the Blue-shirts when we
    know who their V.P. nominee will be. Here are two possibilities:

    PRAISE = BIDEN + HARRIS

    BIDEN + BALDWIN = LOVABLE


    James Dow Allen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Heathfield@21:1/5 to James Dow Allen on Tue Jun 30 01:45:28 2020
    On 29/06/2020 15:53, James Dow Allen wrote:

    <snip>

    Now is the season for campaign mottoes. Wouldn't it add to
    the fun if such mottoes had to be valid base-10 word arithmetic
    puzzles with unique solutions? Here's one for the incumbent:

    MAKE x AMERIKA = INEPT x AGAIN

    Either you screwed up or I did. Probably me. I can find no valid
    solutions. (I even brute-forced it to check.)

    --
    Richard Heathfield
    Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
    "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
    Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Dow Allen@21:1/5 to Richard Heathfield on Mon Jun 29 21:48:42 2020
    On Tuesday, June 30, 2020 at 7:45:34 AM UTC+7, Richard Heathfield wrote:
    On 29/06/2020 15:53, James Dow Allen wrote:

    MAKE x AMERIKA = INEPT x AGAIN

    Either you screwed up or I did. Probably me. I can find no valid
    solutions. (I even brute-forced it to check.)

    I screwed up, not you. :-( :-(
    My face is so red that I'd better crawl into a corner and pout.

    Back in the day, I had the humility and diligence to check
    my results, as well as the acuity to not actually need the checking.
    Now I'm a sad old shadow of my former self.
    (Maybe Viagra would have helped?)

    Mea culpa. Sorry for the time-wasting.

    I don't blame any of you for never trusting me again, but this
    useless one I did double-check:
    MAKE x AMERIKA = MANTIS x AGAIN

    In a vain effort to make amends, I offer this:
    Richard -- what is your middle name? If it is 'Dan'
    then this works in Base-12:
    RICHARD * DAN = HEATHFIELD

    Or would you like to change your middle name to 'Veil'?
    I think this works in Base-11:
    RICHARD * VEIL = HEATHFIELD

    Yes, I am double-checking these now. :-(
    I think there are some nifty middle-names for
    you in Base-13 if you want to go that far! :-)

    James

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carl G.@21:1/5 to James Dow Allen on Thu Jul 2 13:59:03 2020
    On 6/28/2020 2:17 AM, James Dow Allen wrote:
    Recently, champion puzzler Carl G. posted a cryptic message in rec.puzzles:
    testit.

    Dammit, I'm a coder not a mind-reader! What are you testing?

    Given that
    (a) Carl frequently posted word problems,
    (b) He is an excellent COINER of all sorts of puzzles, and
    (c) His surname might be Ginnow
    ... I'm going to guess that he's testing whether rec.puzzles
    is still capable of designing word arithmetic puzzles, with
    unique solutions. I think we are:

    (CARL * R) + GINNOW = COINER

    Since Carl may be trying to ATTRACT interest in rec.p,
    I'll submit another, which may be rather easy.
    (CARL * R) + GINNOW = ATTRACT

    I hope others also post word arithmetic puzzles -- I'd like
    to show off my own! :-)


    But again, I'm not a mind-reader. Perhaps Carl is annoyed
    that nobody has responded to some of his puzzles,
    e.g. "Resistance is Futile":

    ...

    My excuse is that I was AWOL from rec,puzzles in 2000.
    I'll to look into this puzzle tomorrow.

    James Dow Allen


    I was installing Mozilla Thunderbird on an old laptop computer and
    accidentally sent a test message when in my news account, rather than my default account.

    OBPuzzle: Anagram/alphametic below:

    CARL+GINNOW = A*CLOWN+GRIN

    --
    Carl G.
    --
    Carl G.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Heathfield@21:1/5 to Carl G. on Fri Jul 3 00:46:29 2020
    On 02/07/2020 21:59, Carl G. wrote:
    On 6/28/2020 2:17 AM, James Dow Allen wrote:
    Recently, champion puzzler Carl G. posted a cryptic message in
    rec.puzzles:
    testit.

    Dammit, I'm a coder not a mind-reader!  What are you testing?

    Given that
    (a) Carl frequently posted word problems,
    (b) He is an excellent COINER of all sorts of puzzles, and
    (c) His surname might be Ginnow
    ... I'm going to guess that he's testing whether rec.puzzles
    is still capable of designing word arithmetic puzzles, with
    unique solutions.  I think we are:

         (CARL * R) + GINNOW = COINER

    Since Carl may be trying to ATTRACT interest in rec.p,
    I'll submit another, which may be rather easy.
         (CARL * R) + GINNOW = ATTRACT

    I hope others also post word arithmetic puzzles -- I'd like
    to show off my own!  :-)


    But again, I'm not a mind-reader.  Perhaps Carl is annoyed
    that nobody has responded to some of his puzzles,
    e.g. "Resistance is Futile":

    ...

    My excuse is that I was AWOL from rec,puzzles in 2000.
    I'll to look into this puzzle tomorrow.

    James Dow Allen


    I was installing Mozilla Thunderbird on an old laptop computer and accidentally sent a test message when in my news account, rather than my default account.

    OBPuzzle: Anagram/alphametic below:

    CARL+GINNOW = A*CLOWN+GRIN

    s
    p
    o
    i
    l
    e
    r
    s
    p
    a
    c
    e
    3
    s
    p
    o
    i
    l
    e
    r
    s
    p
    a
    c
    e
    2
    s
    p
    o
    i
    l
    e
    r
    s
    p
    a
    c
    e
    1
    s
    p
    o
    i
    l
    e
    r
    s
    p
    a
    c
    e
    0



    CARL+GINNOW = A*CLOWN+GRIN

    8274 + 163395 = 2 * 84953 + 1763

    --
    Richard Heathfield
    Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
    "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
    Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)