1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.OUTDOORS.RV-TRAVEL

  • Washington governor rolls back limitations on police chases

    From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 3 18:48:03 2023
    Washington governor rolls back limitations on police chases

    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/03/washington-governor-rolls-back-limitations-on-police-chases/

    I hope their numbers have improved since the 60s. Back then it was reported that 75% if the police chases in CA ended when someone crashed, and it wasn't always the bad guy.

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to bfh on Thu May 4 10:08:56 2023
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:47:12 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
    On 2023-05-04 01:48:03 +0000, Technobarbarian said:

    Washington governor rolls back limitations on police chases

    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/03/washington-governor-rolls-back-limitations-on-police-chases/


    I hope their numbers have improved since the 60s. Back then it
    was reported that 75% if the police chases in CA ended when someone
    crashed, and it wasn't always the bad guy.

    TB

    Last week (under the current rules) a Trooper was not (quite) chasing
    a local women, when he lost her his last radar reading as 127.... in a
    45 (construction) zone.

    ONLY the WSP "Smokey3" was over-head.

    Which tracked her to the local Mall, then back out. She was followed, when the troopers caught up with her she said "What about the no chase law", and the trooper pointed at the circling aircraft.
    Are you two for or against the new law?

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Don't know, don't care. I don't even know what the law is here. To figure out my opinion I would need more information. I'm just not *that* interested. I only posted this because this has been a topic here and this is the latest information. <
    period>

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Ralph E Lindberg on Thu May 4 12:47:09 2023
    Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
    On 2023-05-04 01:48:03 +0000, Technobarbarian said:

    Washington governor rolls back limitations on police chases

    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/03/washington-governor-rolls-back-limitations-on-police-chases/


          I hope their numbers have improved since the 60s. Back then it >> was reported that 75% if the police chases in CA ended when someone
    crashed, and it wasn't always the bad guy.

    TB

    Last week (under the current rules) a Trooper was not (quite) chasing
    a local women, when he lost her his last radar reading as 127.... in a
    45 (construction) zone.

    ONLY the WSP "Smokey3" was over-head.

    Which tracked her to the local Mall, then back out.  She was followed,
    when the troopers caught up with her she said "What about the no chase
    law", and the trooper pointed at the circling aircraft.

    Are you two for or against the new law?

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Thu May 4 14:20:54 2023
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:47:12 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
    On 2023-05-04 01:48:03 +0000, Technobarbarian said:

    Washington governor rolls back limitations on police chases

    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/03/washington-governor-rolls-back-limitations-on-police-chases/




    I hope their numbers have improved since the 60s. Back then it
    was reported that 75% if the police chases in CA ended when
    someone crashed, and it wasn't always the bad guy.

    TB

    Last week (under the current rules) a Trooper was not (quite)
    chasing a local women, when he lost her his last radar reading
    as 127.... in a 45 (construction) zone.

    ONLY the WSP "Smokey3" was over-head.

    Which tracked her to the local Mall, then back out. She was
    followed, when the troopers caught up with her she said "What
    about the no chase law", and the trooper pointed at the
    circling aircraft.
    Are you two for or against the new law?

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Don't know, don't care. I don't even know what the law is here. To
    figure out my opinion I would need more information. I'm just not
    *that* interested. I only posted this because this has been a topic
    here and this is the latest information. <period>

    LOL!

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George Anthony@21:1/5 to bfh on Thu May 4 13:46:40 2023
    On 5/4/2023 1:20 PM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:47:12 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
    On 2023-05-04 01:48:03 +0000, Technobarbarian said:

    Washington governor rolls back limitations on police chases

    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/03/washington-governor-rolls-back-limitations-on-police-chases/




    I hope their numbers have improved since the 60s. Back then it
    was reported that 75% if the police chases in CA ended when
    someone crashed, and it wasn't always the bad guy.

    TB

    Last week (under the current rules) a Trooper was not (quite)
    chasing a local women, when he lost her his last radar reading
    as 127.... in a 45 (construction) zone.

    ONLY the WSP "Smokey3" was over-head.

    Which tracked her to the local Mall, then back out.  She was
    followed, when the troopers caught up with her she said "What
    about the no chase law", and the trooper pointed at the
    circling aircraft.
    Are you two for or against the new law?

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Don't know, don't care. I don't even know what the law is here. To
    figure out my opinion I would need more information. I'm just not
    *that* interested. I only posted this because this has been a topic
    here and this is the latest information. <period>

    LOL!


    A typical non-committal, non-answer. I may have to change his moniker
    from CC&P to The Artful Dodger.
    --
    (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to George Anthony on Thu May 4 18:01:46 2023
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 11:46:43 AM UTC-7, George Anthony wrote:
    On 5/4/2023 1:20 PM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:47:12 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
    On 2023-05-04 01:48:03 +0000, Technobarbarian said:

    Washington governor rolls back limitations on police chases

    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/03/washington-governor-rolls-back-limitations-on-police-chases/




    I hope their numbers have improved since the 60s. Back then it
    was reported that 75% if the police chases in CA ended when
    someone crashed, and it wasn't always the bad guy.

    TB

    Last week (under the current rules) a Trooper was not (quite)
    chasing a local women, when he lost her his last radar reading
    as 127.... in a 45 (construction) zone.

    ONLY the WSP "Smokey3" was over-head.

    Which tracked her to the local Mall, then back out. She was
    followed, when the troopers caught up with her she said "What
    about the no chase law", and the trooper pointed at the
    circling aircraft.
    Are you two for or against the new law?

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Don't know, don't care. I don't even know what the law is here. To
    figure out my opinion I would need more information. I'm just not
    *that* interested. I only posted this because this has been a topic
    here and this is the latest information. <period>

    LOL!

    A typical non-committal, non-answer. I may have to change his moniker
    from CC&P to The Artful Dodger.
    --
    (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

    So? What do you two think of the new law? Is it perfect? Can it be improved? What changes should they make? Do you think I really give a damn about your opinion?

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George Anthony@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Thu May 4 21:06:09 2023
    On 5/4/2023 8:01 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 11:46:43 AM UTC-7, George Anthony wrote:
    On 5/4/2023 1:20 PM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:47:12 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
    On 2023-05-04 01:48:03 +0000, Technobarbarian said:

    Washington governor rolls back limitations on police chases

    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/03/washington-governor-rolls-back-limitations-on-police-chases/




    I hope their numbers have improved since the 60s. Back then it
    was reported that 75% if the police chases in CA ended when
    someone crashed, and it wasn't always the bad guy.

    TB

    Last week (under the current rules) a Trooper was not (quite)
    chasing a local women, when he lost her his last radar reading
    as 127.... in a 45 (construction) zone.

    ONLY the WSP "Smokey3" was over-head.

    Which tracked her to the local Mall, then back out. She was
    followed, when the troopers caught up with her she said "What
    about the no chase law", and the trooper pointed at the
    circling aircraft.
    Are you two for or against the new law?

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Don't know, don't care. I don't even know what the law is here. To
    figure out my opinion I would need more information. I'm just not
    *that* interested. I only posted this because this has been a topic
    here and this is the latest information. <period>

    LOL!

    A typical non-committal, non-answer. I may have to change his moniker
    from CC&P to The Artful Dodger.
    --
    (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

    So? What do you two think of the new law? Is it perfect? Can it be improved? What changes should they make? Do you think I really give a damn about your opinion?

    TB

    Hey, I don't have a dog in this fight. I was just pointing out one of
    your shortcomings when it comes to giving a straight answer.

    And, I love it. You ask for my opinion and then you say you don't give a
    damn what it is. You poor brain addled misfit.
    --
    (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Thu May 4 23:02:27 2023
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 11:46:43 AM UTC-7, George Anthony
    wrote:
    On 5/4/2023 1:20 PM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:47:12 AM UTC-7, bfh
    wrote:
    Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
    On 2023-05-04 01:48:03 +0000, Technobarbarian said:

    Washington governor rolls back limitations on police
    chases

    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/03/washington-governor-rolls-back-limitations-on-police-chases/






    I hope their numbers have improved since the 60s. Back then it
    was reported that 75% if the police chases in CA ended
    when someone crashed, and it wasn't always the bad
    guy.

    TB

    Last week (under the current rules) a Trooper was not
    (quite) chasing a local women, when he lost her his last
    radar reading as 127.... in a 45 (construction) zone.

    ONLY the WSP "Smokey3" was over-head.

    Which tracked her to the local Mall, then back out. She
    was followed, when the troopers caught up with her she
    said "What about the no chase law", and the trooper
    pointed at the circling aircraft.
    Are you two for or against the new law?

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Don't know, don't care. I don't even know what the law is
    here. To figure out my opinion I would need more information.
    I'm just not *that* interested. I only posted this because
    this has been a topic here and this is the latest
    information. <period>

    LOL!

    A typical non-committal, non-answer. I may have to change his
    moniker from CC&P to The Artful Dodger. -- (Space holder for
    future brilliant signature line)

    So? What do you two think of the new law? Is it perfect? Can it be
    improved? What changes should they make? Do you think I really give
    a damn about your opinion?

    LOL! Of course you don't.........but I hesitantly admit I was sorta
    interested in yours and Ralph's.

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to bfh on Thu May 4 20:57:39 2023
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 8:04:08 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 11:46:43 AM UTC-7, George Anthony
    wrote:
    On 5/4/2023 1:20 PM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:47:12 AM UTC-7, bfh
    wrote:
    Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
    On 2023-05-04 01:48:03 +0000, Technobarbarian said:

    Washington governor rolls back limitations on police
    chases

    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/03/washington-governor-rolls-back-limitations-on-police-chases/






    I hope their numbers have improved since the 60s. Back then it
    was reported that 75% if the police chases in CA ended
    when someone crashed, and it wasn't always the bad
    guy.

    TB

    Last week (under the current rules) a Trooper was not
    (quite) chasing a local women, when he lost her his last
    radar reading as 127.... in a 45 (construction) zone.

    ONLY the WSP "Smokey3" was over-head.

    Which tracked her to the local Mall, then back out. She
    was followed, when the troopers caught up with her she
    said "What about the no chase law", and the trooper
    pointed at the circling aircraft.
    Are you two for or against the new law?

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Don't know, don't care. I don't even know what the law is
    here. To figure out my opinion I would need more information.
    I'm just not *that* interested. I only posted this because
    this has been a topic here and this is the latest
    information. <period>

    LOL!

    A typical non-committal, non-answer. I may have to change his
    moniker from CC&P to The Artful Dodger. -- (Space holder for
    future brilliant signature line)

    So? What do you two think of the new law? Is it perfect? Can it be improved? What changes should they make? Do you think I really give
    a damn about your opinion?
    LOL! Of course you don't.........but I hesitantly admit I was sorta interested in yours and Ralph's.
    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Ok, and I admitted I don't have one. Seriously. And I don't know why I would need one. I'll tell you about my day in my trip report. And what would rather do? Have a day like mine, or take however long it would take to figure out what's going on?
    New law? Old law? Accident statistics? Expert opinions? What do the professionals say? What do the politicians say? Even when you disagree that's all useful information when trying to figure our your own response. I only looked at that article long
    enough to get a vague idea of what changed. I do a lot of reading and I skip over a lot of stuff. I seriously don't know what the law is here and don't care enough to look it up. Like thousands of other things I'll leave this to the "experts"

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)