• 217 Republicans! Let that number sink in

    From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 29 09:34:05 2023
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security Administration and
    many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From filmbydon@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Sat Apr 29 10:14:17 2023
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 9:34:07 AM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security Administration
    and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB

    But, but, didn't YKW tell them not to do it? HawHawHaw!

    A Number 1 Jr.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to film...@gmail.com on Sat Apr 29 12:22:21 2023
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 10:14:18 AM UTC-7, film...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 9:34:07 AM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security Administration
    and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    But, but, didn't YKW tell them not to do it? HawHawHaw!

    A Number 1 Jr.

    Hey! They need that money to save the environment. Who knew Republicans were worried about climate change caused of human activity? LOL

    WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans are touting their debt limit package as a first step toward fiscal restraint, saying it’s past time for Congress to reduce the swelling deficits that they warn are threatening the fiscal health of the country.

    But when a group of Midwestern Republicans went marching this week into the office of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, it wasn’t spending cuts they wanted to talk about.

    They were on a mission to preserve billions of dollars in federal support for biofuels and ethanol.

    The bloc of lawmakers, with Iowa's four Republicans at its core, forced McCarthy to make revisions to the legislation in the hours before it headed to a floor vote, even after the speaker had insisted changes were off the table. The concession amounted
    to a $38.6 billion carve-out to safeguard the incentives for biofuels, carbon capture projects and the ethanol industry, and helped the bill pass by a narrow 217-215 margin.

    https://news.yahoo.com/facing-revolt-gop-spares-ethanol-043823037.html

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Sat Apr 29 16:28:28 2023
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security Administration
    and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB

    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape
    actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table.
    Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has
    always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government
    workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in
    the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on
    a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts
    to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I
    applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to
    be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're
    aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused
    it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the
    issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics
    aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now
    imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that
    at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he
    always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as
    is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do
    you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve
    the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7
    Trillion is what we need right now?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to sticks on Sat Apr 29 14:50:04 2023
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security Administration
    and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table.
    Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has
    always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in
    the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on
    a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts
    to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to
    be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're
    aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused
    it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics
    aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that
    at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he
    always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as
    is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do
    you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve
    the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7
    Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 and the Republicans gifted to rich people.

    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up like Germany before the war. The national debt
    exists because we borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.)

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George Anthony@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Sat Apr 29 19:12:39 2023
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security Administration
    and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB

    How original. Something you don't seem to understand is very few
    republicans are conservatives. As a matter of fact "republicans" are
    nothing more the democrats of the early to mid last century.
    --
    (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George Anthony@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Sat Apr 29 19:17:30 2023
    On 4/29/2023 4:50 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security Administration
    and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape
    actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table.
    Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has
    always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply
    fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government
    workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in
    the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on
    a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts
    to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I
    applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to
    be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're
    aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused
    it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real
    austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the
    issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics
    aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now
    imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that
    at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he
    always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as
    is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do
    you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve
    the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7
    Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 and the Republicans gifted to rich people.

    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up like Germany before the war. The national debt
    exists because we borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.)

    TB

    That wouldn't amount to a drop in the ocean. You could take every penny
    "rich" people have and you still wouldn't make much of a dent in the
    deficit. You're just pandering to the uninformed "I want mine" crowd.
    Why don't you donate to the IRS some of that $8.7 mil you saved.
    --
    (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to George Anthony on Sat Apr 29 20:40:38 2023
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 5:17:30 PM UTC-7, George Anthony wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 4:50 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security
    Administration and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape
    actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table.
    Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has
    always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply >> fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government >> workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in >> the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on
    a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts >> to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I
    applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to
    be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're
    aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused
    it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real
    austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the >> issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics
    aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now
    imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that >> at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he
    always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as
    is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do
    you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve
    the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7
    Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 and the Republicans gifted to rich people.

    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up like Germany before the war. The national debt exists
    because we borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.)

    TB
    That wouldn't amount to a drop in the ocean. You could take every penny "rich" people have and you still wouldn't make much of a dent in the deficit. You're just pandering to the uninformed "I want mine" crowd.
    Why don't you donate to the IRS some of that $8.7 mil you saved.
    --
    (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

    If we can't get enough money from the rich we're doomed. LOL It should hurt to be that dumb.

    "The top ten percent of households own 76% of all wealth in the U.S., while the bottom 50% of households own just 1% of all wealth"

    https://www.stlouisfed.org/open-vault/2020/december/has-wealth-inequality-changed-over-time-key-statistics

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Sun Apr 30 10:54:54 2023
    On 4/29/2023 4:50 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security Administration
    and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape
    actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table.
    Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has
    always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply
    fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government
    workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in
    the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on
    a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts
    to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I
    applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to
    be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're
    aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused
    it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real
    austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the
    issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics
    aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now
    imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that
    at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he
    always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as
    is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do
    you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve
    the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7
    Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 and the Republicans gifted to rich people.

    Yeah, you have to go back to Kennedy for a time when Democrats
    understood raising taxes would lower the amount the government brought
    in. Libs just don't get it. Trumps tax plan created the best economy
    this country has ever seen. There is simply no honest denying it. Of
    course that doesn't mean partisan people like you will do it. This war
    on the rich and making them pay "their fair share" gets libs votes. Now
    your friends want to tax unrealized gains. Insanity.

    <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/its-official-trumps-tax-cuts-paid-for-themselves>

    <https://www.heritage.org/taxes/commentary/the-numbers-are-trumps-tax-cuts-paid>

    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up like Germany before the war. The national debt
    exists because we borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.)

    TB

    Not $7,000,000,000. You missed three zeroes. It's $7,000,000,000,000!
    Are you clueless about how the Fed creates money, or are you just lying
    about the pyramid scheme it has actually created and the fact the debt
    exists and is unsustainable? It's not magic, but most on the LEFT think
    it is. We've all seen the videos of people saying Obama would give them
    their stuff, like the government actually has money of it's own.

    Though not magic, the system now mostly works on the *promise* that the
    by purchasing and selling of things like treasury bonds and injecting
    them as funds into the banking system, that the bonds are secured by the
    full faith and credit of the U.S government. What do you think the
    fight is about right now? The national debt never gets paid. The more
    money the Fed inserts into the system creates inflation which
    accelerates the problem and devalues the currency further. Someday,
    when real austerity hits, our children and grandchildren will have to
    pay the price of the cowardice of our politicians for not addressing
    this. You think this can go on forever and all the ridiculous social engineering the libs want comes without cost. That would be magic.
    Your answer is to tax the rich, and crush the economy further. It's all
    mind numbingly dumb.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to sticks on Sun Apr 30 11:38:47 2023
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 8:54:58 AM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 4:50 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security
    Administration and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape
    actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table.
    Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has
    always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply >> fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government >> workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in >> the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on
    a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts >> to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I
    applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to
    be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're
    aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused
    it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real
    austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the >> issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics
    aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now
    imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that >> at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he
    always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as
    is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do
    you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve
    the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7
    Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 and the Republicans gifted to rich people.
    Yeah, you have to go back to Kennedy for a time when Democrats
    understood raising taxes would lower the amount the government brought
    in. Libs just don't get it. Trumps tax plan created the best economy
    this country has ever seen. There is simply no honest denying it. Of
    course that doesn't mean partisan people like you will do it. This war
    on the rich and making them pay "their fair share" gets libs votes. Now
    your friends want to tax unrealized gains. Insanity.

    <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/its-official-trumps-tax-cuts-paid-for-themselves>

    <https://www.heritage.org/taxes/commentary/the-numbers-are-trumps-tax-cuts-paid>
    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up like Germany before the war. The national debt exists
    because we borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.)

    TB
    Not $7,000,000,000. You missed three zeroes. It's $7,000,000,000,000!
    Are you clueless about how the Fed creates money, or are you just lying about the pyramid scheme it has actually created and the fact the debt exists and is unsustainable? It's not magic, but most on the LEFT think
    it is. We've all seen the videos of people saying Obama would give them their stuff, like the government actually has money of it's own.

    Though not magic, the system now mostly works on the *promise* that the
    by purchasing and selling of things like treasury bonds and injecting
    them as funds into the banking system, that the bonds are secured by the full faith and credit of the U.S government. What do you think the
    fight is about right now? The national debt never gets paid. The more
    money the Fed inserts into the system creates inflation which
    accelerates the problem and devalues the currency further. Someday,
    when real austerity hits, our children and grandchildren will have to
    pay the price of the cowardice of our politicians for not addressing
    this. You think this can go on forever and all the ridiculous social engineering the libs want comes without cost. That would be magic.
    Your answer is to tax the rich, and crush the economy further. It's all
    mind numbingly dumb.

    Our government has always spent more than they take in, right from the start. We just keeping rolling our debt over. We have never paid our debt for WWII for example. Since you believe in magic money I'm not going to waste a lot of time on this.

    "Please Don’t Feed the Debt Scolds"

    "The point is that in the early 2010s, the last time we faced a potential crisis over the debt ceiling, there was an elite consensus that budget deficits were a severe, even existential threat. This consensus was, in retrospect, completely wrong. Yet it
    almost completely dominated the political conversation, to such an extent that, as Ezra Klein pointed out, the media abandoned the normal rules of reportorial neutrality and openly cheered proposals to cut Social Security and Medicare.

    And those of us who challenged the elite consensus, mocking the peddlers of debt panic as Very Serious People (because ranting about the evils of debt sounds serious and responsible, even when the math doesn’t support the rhetoric), were treated as odd
    and out of touch.

    Now the Very Serious People are trying to make a comeback, in effect lending cover to Republican efforts to hold America hostage by refusing to raise the debt ceiling. So it’s important to realize that the case for debt panic is, if anything, even
    weaker than it was in 2011.

    It’s true that U.S. debt is very large — $31 trillion (said in your best Dr. Evil voice). But America is a big country, so almost every economic number is very large. A better way to think about debt is to ask whether interest payments are a major
    burden on the budget. In 2011 these payments were 1.47 percent of gross domestic product — half what they had been in the mid-1990s. In 2021 they were 1.51 percent. This number will rise as existing debt is rolled over at higher interest rates, but
    real net interest — interest payments adjusted for inflation — is likely to remain below 1 percent of G.D.P for the next decade."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/23/opinion/government-debt-deficit.html

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Sun Apr 30 16:06:11 2023
    On 4/30/2023 1:38 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 8:54:58 AM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 4:50 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security
    Administration and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape
    actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table.
    Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has
    always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply >>>> fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government >>>> workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in >>>> the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on >>>> a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts >>>> to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I >>>> applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to >>>> be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're
    aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused
    it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real >>>> austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the >>>> issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics
    aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now >>>> imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that >>>> at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he
    always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as
    is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do
    you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve >>>> the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7
    Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 and the Republicans gifted to rich people.
    Yeah, you have to go back to Kennedy for a time when Democrats
    understood raising taxes would lower the amount the government brought
    in. Libs just don't get it. Trumps tax plan created the best economy
    this country has ever seen. There is simply no honest denying it. Of
    course that doesn't mean partisan people like you will do it. This war
    on the rich and making them pay "their fair share" gets libs votes. Now
    your friends want to tax unrealized gains. Insanity.

    <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/its-official-trumps-tax-cuts-paid-for-themselves>

    <https://www.heritage.org/taxes/commentary/the-numbers-are-trumps-tax-cuts-paid>
    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up like Germany before the war. The national debt exists
    because we borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.) >>>
    TB
    Not $7,000,000,000. You missed three zeroes. It's $7,000,000,000,000!
    Are you clueless about how the Fed creates money, or are you just lying
    about the pyramid scheme it has actually created and the fact the debt
    exists and is unsustainable? It's not magic, but most on the LEFT think
    it is. We've all seen the videos of people saying Obama would give them
    their stuff, like the government actually has money of it's own.

    Though not magic, the system now mostly works on the *promise* that the
    by purchasing and selling of things like treasury bonds and injecting
    them as funds into the banking system, that the bonds are secured by the
    full faith and credit of the U.S government. What do you think the
    fight is about right now? The national debt never gets paid. The more
    money the Fed inserts into the system creates inflation which
    accelerates the problem and devalues the currency further. Someday,
    when real austerity hits, our children and grandchildren will have to
    pay the price of the cowardice of our politicians for not addressing
    this. You think this can go on forever and all the ridiculous social
    engineering the libs want comes without cost. That would be magic.
    Your answer is to tax the rich, and crush the economy further. It's all
    mind numbingly dumb.

    Our government has always spent more than they take in, right from the start. We just keeping rolling our debt over. We have never paid our debt for WWII for example. Since you believe in magic money I'm not going to waste a lot of time on this.


    Hilarous! As I pointed out above, it is you who thinks this huge debt
    is somehow not a real issue and thinks it is magic, and the politicians
    are wizards who can keep the act rolling.

    "Please Don’t Feed the Debt Scolds"

    "The point is that in the early 2010s, the last time we faced a potential crisis over the debt ceiling, there was an elite consensus that budget deficits were a severe, even existential threat. This consensus was, in retrospect, completely wrong. Yet
    it almost completely dominated the political conversation, to such an extent that, as Ezra Klein pointed out, the media abandoned the normal rules of reportorial neutrality and openly cheered proposals to cut Social Security and Medicare.

    And those of us who challenged the elite consensus, mocking the peddlers of debt panic as Very Serious People (because ranting about the evils of debt sounds serious and responsible, even when the math doesn’t support the rhetoric), were treated as
    odd and out of touch.

    Now the Very Serious People are trying to make a comeback, in effect lending cover to Republican efforts to hold America hostage by refusing to raise the debt ceiling. So it’s important to realize that the case for debt panic is, if anything, even
    weaker than it was in 2011.

    It’s true that U.S. debt is very large — $31 trillion (said in your best Dr. Evil voice). But America is a big country, so almost every economic number is very large. A better way to think about debt is to ask whether interest payments are a major
    burden on the budget. In 2011 these payments were 1.47 percent of gross domestic product — half what they had been in the mid-1990s. In 2021 they were 1.51 percent. This number will rise as existing debt is rolled over at higher interest rates, but
    real net interest — interest payments adjusted for inflation — is likely to remain below 1 percent of G.D.P for the next decade."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/23/opinion/government-debt-deficit.html

    TB

    I like how you use a NY Slimes article, a well known conservative
    outlet, to gloss over the facts. As an example they cite interest only payments based on the GDP. That is really slight of hand wizardry,
    though often used to define how bad the problem is. They use it to
    minimize it, amazingly. They could have given a real number. $475
    billion in fiscal year 2022. Half a trillion dollars!

    <https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2023/02/interest-costs-on-the-national-debt-are-on-track-to-reach-a-record-high>

    Or how about this: "Divided among the U.S. population, the total
    federal debt is at $94,000 per person or $240,000 per U.S. household."

    Considering over half the population doesn't even pay any taxes, I'll
    just mail in $188K and hope you all do the same. Ha!

    <https://www.cato.org/blog/debt-limit-high-costs-debt>

    Claiming that interest payments will remain below 1% is so laughable
    only a democrat would fall for it. Of course, only democrats give a
    rats ass what the NY Slimes have to say anymore. The rest of us rightly
    view it as pure DNC propaganda. They don't even try to hide it anymore.
    If the NY Slimes writes it, usually the opposite is true!

    There's obviously no sense debating with a lefty like you on these
    things, but I still applaud any member of congress who has the guts to
    address the situation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From filmbydon@gmail.com@21:1/5 to sticks on Sun Apr 30 18:15:24 2023
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 2:06:15 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/30/2023 1:38 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 8:54:58 AM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 4:50 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security
    Administration and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape >>>> actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table. >>>> Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has >>>> always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply >>>> fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government >>>> workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in >>>> the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on >>>> a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts
    to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I >>>> applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to >>>> be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're
    aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused >>>> it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real >>>> austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the
    issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics
    aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now >>>> imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that >>>> at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he >>>> always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as >>>> is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do >>>> you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve >>>> the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7
    Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 and the Republicans gifted to rich people.
    Yeah, you have to go back to Kennedy for a time when Democrats
    understood raising taxes would lower the amount the government brought
    in. Libs just don't get it. Trumps tax plan created the best economy
    this country has ever seen. There is simply no honest denying it. Of
    course that doesn't mean partisan people like you will do it. This war
    on the rich and making them pay "their fair share" gets libs votes. Now >> your friends want to tax unrealized gains. Insanity.

    <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/its-official-trumps-tax-cuts-paid-for-themselves>

    <https://www.heritage.org/taxes/commentary/the-numbers-are-trumps-tax-cuts-paid>
    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up like Germany before the war. The national debt
    exists because we borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.)

    TB
    Not $7,000,000,000. You missed three zeroes. It's $7,000,000,000,000!
    Are you clueless about how the Fed creates money, or are you just lying >> about the pyramid scheme it has actually created and the fact the debt
    exists and is unsustainable? It's not magic, but most on the LEFT think >> it is. We've all seen the videos of people saying Obama would give them >> their stuff, like the government actually has money of it's own.

    Though not magic, the system now mostly works on the *promise* that the >> by purchasing and selling of things like treasury bonds and injecting
    them as funds into the banking system, that the bonds are secured by the >> full faith and credit of the U.S government. What do you think the
    fight is about right now? The national debt never gets paid. The more
    money the Fed inserts into the system creates inflation which
    accelerates the problem and devalues the currency further. Someday,
    when real austerity hits, our children and grandchildren will have to
    pay the price of the cowardice of our politicians for not addressing
    this. You think this can go on forever and all the ridiculous social
    engineering the libs want comes without cost. That would be magic.
    Your answer is to tax the rich, and crush the economy further. It's all >> mind numbingly dumb.

    Our government has always spent more than they take in, right from the start. We just keeping rolling our debt over. We have never paid our debt for WWII for example. Since you believe in magic money I'm not going to waste a lot of time on this.

    Hilarous! As I pointed out above, it is you who thinks this huge debt
    is somehow not a real issue and thinks it is magic, and the politicians
    are wizards who can keep the act rolling.
    "Please Don’t Feed the Debt Scolds"

    "The point is that in the early 2010s, the last time we faced a potential crisis over the debt ceiling, there was an elite consensus that budget deficits were a severe, even existential threat. This consensus was, in retrospect, completely wrong. Yet
    it almost completely dominated the political conversation, to such an extent that, as Ezra Klein pointed out, the media abandoned the normal rules of reportorial neutrality and openly cheered proposals to cut Social Security and Medicare.

    And those of us who challenged the elite consensus, mocking the peddlers of debt panic as Very Serious People (because ranting about the evils of debt sounds serious and responsible, even when the math doesn’t support the rhetoric), were treated as
    odd and out of touch.

    Now the Very Serious People are trying to make a comeback, in effect lending cover to Republican efforts to hold America hostage by refusing to raise the debt ceiling. So it’s important to realize that the case for debt panic is, if anything, even
    weaker than it was in 2011.

    It’s true that U.S. debt is very large — $31 trillion (said in your best Dr. Evil voice). But America is a big country, so almost every economic number is very large. A better way to think about debt is to ask whether interest payments are a
    major burden on the budget. In 2011 these payments were 1.47 percent of gross domestic product — half what they had been in the mid-1990s. In 2021 they were 1.51 percent. This number will rise as existing debt is rolled over at higher interest rates,
    but real net interest — interest payments adjusted for inflation — is likely to remain below 1 percent of G.D.P for the next decade."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/23/opinion/government-debt-deficit.html

    TB
    I like how you use a NY Slimes article, a well known conservative
    outlet, to gloss over the facts. As an example they cite interest only payments based on the GDP. That is really slight of hand wizardry,
    though often used to define how bad the problem is. They use it to
    minimize it, amazingly. They could have given a real number. $475
    billion in fiscal year 2022. Half a trillion dollars!

    <https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2023/02/interest-costs-on-the-national-debt-are-on-track-to-reach-a-record-high>

    Or how about this: "Divided among the U.S. population, the total
    federal debt is at $94,000 per person or $240,000 per U.S. household."

    Considering over half the population doesn't even pay any taxes, I'll
    just mail in $188K and hope you all do the same. Ha!

    <https://www.cato.org/blog/debt-limit-high-costs-debt>

    Claiming that interest payments will remain below 1% is so laughable
    only a democrat would fall for it. Of course, only democrats give a
    rats ass what the NY Slimes have to say anymore. The rest of us rightly
    view it as pure DNC propaganda. They don't even try to hide it anymore.
    If the NY Slimes writes it, usually the opposite is true!

    There's obviously no sense debating with a lefty like you on these
    things, but I still applaud any member of congress who has the guts to address the situation.

    What about the military, and V.A. funds, for our heroes, who served, & the ones who put their lives on the line for our nation now? Why is, or should, the GOP proudly pinch that funding? Isn't patriotism what Republicans are supposed to be all
    about?

    Uncle Sugar

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to film...@gmail.com on Mon May 1 08:17:49 2023
    On 4/30/2023 8:15 PM, film...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 2:06:15 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/30/2023 1:38 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 8:54:58 AM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 4:50 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security
    Administration and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape >>>>>> actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table. >>>>>> Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has >>>>>> always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply >>>>>> fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government >>>>>> workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in >>>>>> the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on >>>>>> a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts >>>>>> to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I >>>>>> applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to >>>>>> be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're >>>>>> aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused >>>>>> it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real >>>>>> austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the >>>>>> issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics
    aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now >>>>>> imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that >>>>>> at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he >>>>>> always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as >>>>>> is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do >>>>>> you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve >>>>>> the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7 >>>>>> Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 and the Republicans gifted to rich people.
    Yeah, you have to go back to Kennedy for a time when Democrats
    understood raising taxes would lower the amount the government brought >>>> in. Libs just don't get it. Trumps tax plan created the best economy
    this country has ever seen. There is simply no honest denying it. Of
    course that doesn't mean partisan people like you will do it. This war >>>> on the rich and making them pay "their fair share" gets libs votes. Now >>>> your friends want to tax unrealized gains. Insanity.

    <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/its-official-trumps-tax-cuts-paid-for-themselves>

    <https://www.heritage.org/taxes/commentary/the-numbers-are-trumps-tax-cuts-paid>
    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up like Germany before the war. The national debt
    exists because we borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.)

    TB
    Not $7,000,000,000. You missed three zeroes. It's $7,000,000,000,000!
    Are you clueless about how the Fed creates money, or are you just lying >>>> about the pyramid scheme it has actually created and the fact the debt >>>> exists and is unsustainable? It's not magic, but most on the LEFT think >>>> it is. We've all seen the videos of people saying Obama would give them >>>> their stuff, like the government actually has money of it's own.

    Though not magic, the system now mostly works on the *promise* that the >>>> by purchasing and selling of things like treasury bonds and injecting
    them as funds into the banking system, that the bonds are secured by the >>>> full faith and credit of the U.S government. What do you think the
    fight is about right now? The national debt never gets paid. The more
    money the Fed inserts into the system creates inflation which
    accelerates the problem and devalues the currency further. Someday,
    when real austerity hits, our children and grandchildren will have to
    pay the price of the cowardice of our politicians for not addressing
    this. You think this can go on forever and all the ridiculous social
    engineering the libs want comes without cost. That would be magic.
    Your answer is to tax the rich, and crush the economy further. It's all >>>> mind numbingly dumb.

    Our government has always spent more than they take in, right from the start. We just keeping rolling our debt over. We have never paid our debt for WWII for example. Since you believe in magic money I'm not going to waste a lot of time on this.

    Hilarous! As I pointed out above, it is you who thinks this huge debt
    is somehow not a real issue and thinks it is magic, and the politicians
    are wizards who can keep the act rolling.
    "Please Don’t Feed the Debt Scolds"

    "The point is that in the early 2010s, the last time we faced a potential crisis over the debt ceiling, there was an elite consensus that budget deficits were a severe, even existential threat. This consensus was, in retrospect, completely wrong. Yet
    it almost completely dominated the political conversation, to such an extent that, as Ezra Klein pointed out, the media abandoned the normal rules of reportorial neutrality and openly cheered proposals to cut Social Security and Medicare.

    And those of us who challenged the elite consensus, mocking the peddlers of debt panic as Very Serious People (because ranting about the evils of debt sounds serious and responsible, even when the math doesn’t support the rhetoric), were treated as
    odd and out of touch.

    Now the Very Serious People are trying to make a comeback, in effect lending cover to Republican efforts to hold America hostage by refusing to raise the debt ceiling. So it’s important to realize that the case for debt panic is, if anything, even
    weaker than it was in 2011.

    It’s true that U.S. debt is very large — $31 trillion (said in your best Dr. Evil voice). But America is a big country, so almost every economic number is very large. A better way to think about debt is to ask whether interest payments are a
    major burden on the budget. In 2011 these payments were 1.47 percent of gross domestic product — half what they had been in the mid-1990s. In 2021 they were 1.51 percent. This number will rise as existing debt is rolled over at higher interest rates,
    but real net interest — interest payments adjusted for inflation — is likely to remain below 1 percent of G.D.P for the next decade."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/23/opinion/government-debt-deficit.html

    TB
    I like how you use a NY Slimes article, a well known conservative
    outlet, to gloss over the facts. As an example they cite interest only
    payments based on the GDP. That is really slight of hand wizardry,
    though often used to define how bad the problem is. They use it to
    minimize it, amazingly. They could have given a real number. $475
    billion in fiscal year 2022. Half a trillion dollars!

    <https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2023/02/interest-costs-on-the-national-debt-are-on-track-to-reach-a-record-high>

    Or how about this: "Divided among the U.S. population, the total
    federal debt is at $94,000 per person or $240,000 per U.S. household."

    Considering over half the population doesn't even pay any taxes, I'll
    just mail in $188K and hope you all do the same. Ha!

    <https://www.cato.org/blog/debt-limit-high-costs-debt>

    Claiming that interest payments will remain below 1% is so laughable
    only a democrat would fall for it. Of course, only democrats give a
    rats ass what the NY Slimes have to say anymore. The rest of us rightly
    view it as pure DNC propaganda. They don't even try to hide it anymore.
    If the NY Slimes writes it, usually the opposite is true!

    There's obviously no sense debating with a lefty like you on these
    things, but I still applaud any member of congress who has the guts to
    address the situation.

    What about the military, and V.A. funds, for our heroes, who served, & the ones who put their lives on the line for our nation now? Why is, or should, the GOP proudly pinch that funding? Isn't patriotism what Republicans are supposed to be all
    about?

    Uncle Sugar

    I can see reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to sticks on Mon May 1 16:38:07 2023
    On 5/1/23 8:17 AM, sticks wrote:
    On 4/30/2023 8:15 PM, film...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 2:06:15 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/30/2023 1:38 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 8:54:58 AM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 4:50 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major >>>>>>>> reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by
    the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut >>>>>>>> key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members. >>>>>>>>
    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party >>>>>>>> lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department >>>>>>>> of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to >>>>>>>> the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like >>>>>>>> Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would >>>>>>>> not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday
    afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit >>>>>>>> — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at >>>>>>>> least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security Administration and >>>>>>>> many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security
    advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on >>>>>>> tape
    actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table. >>>>>>> Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has >>>>>>> always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is >>>>>>> simply
    fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new
    government
    workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the
    corruption in
    the Social Security administration. That would help get the
    program on
    a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that >>>>>>> no cuts
    to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. >>>>>>> But I
    applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something
    has to
    be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're >>>>>>> aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly
    caused
    it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and >>>>>>> real
    austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to
    tackle the
    issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics >>>>>>> aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly
    must now
    imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the
    hope that
    at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he >>>>>>> always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never
    pass as
    is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So
    when do
    you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to >>>>>>> solve
    the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7 >>>>>>> Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 >>>>>> and the Republicans gifted to rich people.
    Yeah, you have to go back to Kennedy for a time when Democrats
    understood raising taxes would lower the amount the government brought >>>>> in. Libs just don't get it. Trumps tax plan created the best economy >>>>> this country has ever seen. There is simply no honest denying it. Of >>>>> course that doesn't mean partisan people like you will do it. This war >>>>> on the rich and making them pay "their fair share" gets libs votes.
    Now
    your friends want to tax unrealized gains. Insanity.

    <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/its-official-trumps-tax-cuts-paid-for-themselves>

    <https://www.heritage.org/taxes/commentary/the-numbers-are-trumps-tax-cuts-paid>
    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who
    believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 >>>>>> we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up >>>>>> like Germany before the war. The national debt exists because we
    borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.) >>>>>>
    TB
    Not $7,000,000,000. You missed three zeroes. It's $7,000,000,000,000! >>>>> Are you clueless about how the Fed creates money, or are you just
    lying
    about the pyramid scheme it has actually created and the fact the debt >>>>> exists and is unsustainable? It's not magic, but most on the LEFT
    think
    it is. We've all seen the videos of people saying Obama would give
    them
    their stuff, like the government actually has money of it's own.

    Though not magic, the system now mostly works on the *promise* that
    the
    by purchasing and selling of things like treasury bonds and injecting >>>>> them as funds into the banking system, that the bonds are secured
    by the
    full faith and credit of the U.S government. What do you think the
    fight is about right now? The national debt never gets paid. The more >>>>> money the Fed inserts into the system creates inflation which
    accelerates the problem and devalues the currency further. Someday,
    when real austerity hits, our children and grandchildren will have to >>>>> pay the price of the cowardice of our politicians for not addressing >>>>> this. You think this can go on forever and all the ridiculous social >>>>> engineering the libs want comes without cost. That would be magic.
    Your answer is to tax the rich, and crush the economy further. It's
    all
    mind numbingly dumb.

    Our government has always spent more than they take in, right from
    the start. We just keeping rolling our debt over. We have never paid
    our debt for WWII for example. Since you believe in magic money I'm
    not going to waste a lot of time on this.

    Hilarous! As I pointed out above, it is you who thinks this huge debt
    is somehow not a real issue and thinks it is magic, and the politicians
    are wizards who can keep the act rolling.
    "Please Don’t Feed the Debt Scolds"

    "The point is that in the early 2010s, the last time we faced a
    potential crisis over the debt ceiling, there was an elite consensus
    that budget deficits were a severe, even existential threat. This
    consensus was, in retrospect, completely wrong. Yet it almost
    completely dominated the political conversation, to such an extent
    that, as Ezra Klein pointed out, the media abandoned the normal
    rules of reportorial neutrality and openly cheered proposals to cut
    Social Security and Medicare.

    And those of us who challenged the elite consensus, mocking the
    peddlers of debt panic as Very Serious People (because ranting about
    the evils of debt sounds serious and responsible, even when the math
    doesn’t support the rhetoric), were treated as odd and out of touch. >>>>
    Now the Very Serious People are trying to make a comeback, in effect
    lending cover to Republican efforts to hold America hostage by
    refusing to raise the debt ceiling. So it’s important to realize
    that the case for debt panic is, if anything, even weaker than it
    was in 2011.

    It’s true that U.S. debt is very large — $31 trillion (said in your >>>> best Dr. Evil voice). But America is a big country, so almost every
    economic number is very large. A better way to think about debt is
    to ask whether interest payments are a major burden on the budget.
    In 2011 these payments were 1.47 percent of gross domestic product — >>>> half what they had been in the mid-1990s. In 2021 they were 1.51
    percent. This number will rise as existing debt is rolled over at
    higher interest rates, but real net interest — interest payments
    adjusted for inflation — is likely to remain below 1 percent of
    G.D.P for the next decade."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/23/opinion/government-debt-deficit.html >>>>
    TB
    I like how you use a NY Slimes article, a well known conservative
    outlet, to gloss over the facts. As an example they cite interest only
    payments based on the GDP. That is really slight of hand wizardry,
    though often used to define how bad the problem is. They use it to
    minimize it, amazingly. They could have given a real number. $475
    billion in fiscal year 2022. Half a trillion dollars!

    <https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2023/02/interest-costs-on-the-national-debt-are-on-track-to-reach-a-record-high>

    Or how about this: "Divided among the U.S. population, the total
    federal debt is at $94,000 per person or $240,000 per U.S. household."

    Considering over half the population doesn't even pay any taxes, I'll
    just mail in $188K and hope you all do the same. Ha!

    <https://www.cato.org/blog/debt-limit-high-costs-debt>

    Claiming that interest payments will remain below 1% is so laughable
    only a democrat would fall for it. Of course, only democrats give a
    rats ass what the NY Slimes have to say anymore. The rest of us rightly
    view it as pure DNC propaganda. They don't even try to hide it anymore.
    If the NY Slimes writes it, usually the opposite is true!

    There's obviously no sense debating with a lefty like you on these
    things, but I still applaud any member of congress who has the guts to
    address the situation.

    What about the military, and V.A. funds, for our heroes,  who served,
    & the ones who put their lives on the line for our nation now?   Why
    is,  or should, the GOP proudly pinch that funding?  Isn't patriotism
    what Republicans are supposed to be all about?

    Uncle Sugar

    I can see reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

    Liberals spend too much time climbing their ladders of inference to
    comprehend any issue.
    --
    Democrats still standing behind Biden are showing an unparalleled level
    of stupidity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to film...@gmail.com on Tue May 2 09:51:21 2023
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 6:15:25 PM UTC-7, film...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 2:06:15 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/30/2023 1:38 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 8:54:58 AM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 4:50 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:28:32 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 4/29/2023 11:34 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    217 is the number of patriotic Republicans who voted for a major reduction in benefits for veterans.

    "Veterans are blasting the debt ceiling legislation passed by the Republican-controlled House this week, warning it will cut key programs and services for the nation’s retired service members.

    The House passed the Limit, Save, Grow Act largely along party lines in a 217-215 vote Wednesday night despite the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) warning of a drastic 22 percent cut to the department’s budget under the bill."

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/veterans-sound-alarm-mccarthy-budget-220831185.html

    Their ransom note is also seeking cuts in other programs, like Social Security after Republicans many denials that they would not do this.

    "The full House passed by a 217-215 vote late Wednesday afternoon Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s bill to raise the debt limit — the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 — which would result in at least a 23% budget cut to the Social Security
    Administration and many other federal agencies, according to a Social Security advocacy group."

    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2023/04/26/house-passes-debt-limit-bill-that-trims-social-security-administration/

    TB
    Kinda funny considering the fool in the Whitehouse is the one on tape >>>> actually stating cuts to the entitlement programs were on the table. >>>> Course that was back when he could assemble a full sentence. He has >>>> always been dumb, but at least he used to be able to talk. It is simply
    fear-mongering FWIW, instead of using those thousands of new government
    workers at the IRS, they should hire them to root out the corruption in
    the Social Security administration. That would help get the program on
    a better path to solvency.

    The republicans, in passing the legislation, have all vowed that no cuts
    to veterans benefits, Social Security, or Medicaid would happen. But I
    applaud their courage in being realists and insisting something has to
    be done to get the spending and debt under control. Perhaps you're >>>> aware of the current inflation, the Biden spending that mostly caused >>>> it, $31.7 Trillion national debt, and the inevitable collapse and real
    austerity that will result if someone doesn't have to guts to tackle the
    issue? Of course not, you just want your stuff. Set your politics >>>> aside for awhile and get your head out of the sand. This is
    unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Anyone thinking clearly must now
    imagine it must be intentional.

    Also mentioned, but not reported by the liberal media, is the hope that
    at least Biden will finally come to the table and negotiate, like he >>>> always insisted on when he was in the Senate. This will never pass as >>>> is in the Democrat Senate, and the house surely knew this. So when do >>>> you think your man in the Whitehouse will get serious and try to solve
    the issue? Or do you really think printing and spending another $7 >>>> Trillion is what we need right now?

    Nope, what we *really* need to do is get rid of the tax breaks #45 and the Republicans gifted to rich people.
    Yeah, you have to go back to Kennedy for a time when Democrats
    understood raising taxes would lower the amount the government brought >> in. Libs just don't get it. Trumps tax plan created the best economy
    this country has ever seen. There is simply no honest denying it. Of
    course that doesn't mean partisan people like you will do it. This war >> on the rich and making them pay "their fair share" gets libs votes. Now >> your friends want to tax unrealized gains. Insanity.

    <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/its-official-trumps-tax-cuts-paid-for-themselves>

    <https://www.heritage.org/taxes/commentary/the-numbers-are-trumps-tax-cuts-paid>
    (Just as a side note, because we have a lot of people here who believe in magic money: In order to print and spend $7,000,000,000 we would need to borrow that amount of money. Otherwise you end up like Germany before the war. The national debt
    exists because we borrowed that money so we could spend it. There is no magic money.)

    TB
    Not $7,000,000,000. You missed three zeroes. It's $7,000,000,000,000! >> Are you clueless about how the Fed creates money, or are you just lying >> about the pyramid scheme it has actually created and the fact the debt >> exists and is unsustainable? It's not magic, but most on the LEFT think >> it is. We've all seen the videos of people saying Obama would give them >> their stuff, like the government actually has money of it's own.

    Though not magic, the system now mostly works on the *promise* that the >> by purchasing and selling of things like treasury bonds and injecting >> them as funds into the banking system, that the bonds are secured by the
    full faith and credit of the U.S government. What do you think the
    fight is about right now? The national debt never gets paid. The more >> money the Fed inserts into the system creates inflation which
    accelerates the problem and devalues the currency further. Someday,
    when real austerity hits, our children and grandchildren will have to >> pay the price of the cowardice of our politicians for not addressing
    this. You think this can go on forever and all the ridiculous social
    engineering the libs want comes without cost. That would be magic.
    Your answer is to tax the rich, and crush the economy further. It's all >> mind numbingly dumb.

    Our government has always spent more than they take in, right from the start. We just keeping rolling our debt over. We have never paid our debt for WWII for example. Since you believe in magic money I'm not going to waste a lot of time on this.

    Hilarous! As I pointed out above, it is you who thinks this huge debt
    is somehow not a real issue and thinks it is magic, and the politicians are wizards who can keep the act rolling.
    "Please Don’t Feed the Debt Scolds"

    "The point is that in the early 2010s, the last time we faced a potential crisis over the debt ceiling, there was an elite consensus that budget deficits were a severe, even existential threat. This consensus was, in retrospect, completely wrong.
    Yet it almost completely dominated the political conversation, to such an extent that, as Ezra Klein pointed out, the media abandoned the normal rules of reportorial neutrality and openly cheered proposals to cut Social Security and Medicare.

    And those of us who challenged the elite consensus, mocking the peddlers of debt panic as Very Serious People (because ranting about the evils of debt sounds serious and responsible, even when the math doesn’t support the rhetoric), were treated
    as odd and out of touch.

    Now the Very Serious People are trying to make a comeback, in effect lending cover to Republican efforts to hold America hostage by refusing to raise the debt ceiling. So it’s important to realize that the case for debt panic is, if anything,
    even weaker than it was in 2011.

    It’s true that U.S. debt is very large — $31 trillion (said in your best Dr. Evil voice). But America is a big country, so almost every economic number is very large. A better way to think about debt is to ask whether interest payments are a
    major burden on the budget. In 2011 these payments were 1.47 percent of gross domestic product — half what they had been in the mid-1990s. In 2021 they were 1.51 percent. This number will rise as existing debt is rolled over at higher interest rates,
    but real net interest — interest payments adjusted for inflation — is likely to remain below 1 percent of G.D.P for the next decade."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/23/opinion/government-debt-deficit.html

    TB
    I like how you use a NY Slimes article, a well known conservative
    outlet, to gloss over the facts. As an example they cite interest only payments based on the GDP. That is really slight of hand wizardry,
    though often used to define how bad the problem is. They use it to minimize it, amazingly. They could have given a real number. $475
    billion in fiscal year 2022. Half a trillion dollars!

    <https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2023/02/interest-costs-on-the-national-debt-are-on-track-to-reach-a-record-high>

    Or how about this: "Divided among the U.S. population, the total
    federal debt is at $94,000 per person or $240,000 per U.S. household."

    Considering over half the population doesn't even pay any taxes, I'll
    just mail in $188K and hope you all do the same. Ha!

    <https://www.cato.org/blog/debt-limit-high-costs-debt>

    Claiming that interest payments will remain below 1% is so laughable
    only a democrat would fall for it. Of course, only democrats give a
    rats ass what the NY Slimes have to say anymore. The rest of us rightly view it as pure DNC propaganda. They don't even try to hide it anymore.
    If the NY Slimes writes it, usually the opposite is true!

    There's obviously no sense debating with a lefty like you on these
    things, but I still applaud any member of congress who has the guts to address the situation.
    What about the military, and V.A. funds, for our heroes, who served, & the ones who put their lives on the line for our nation now? Why is, or should, the GOP proudly pinch that funding? Isn't patriotism what Republicans are supposed to be all about?

    Uncle Sugar

    "President Biden: I hear House Republicans out on TV saying they would never vote to cut veterans'...

    I hear House Republicans out on TV saying they would never vote to cut veterans’ benefits.

    In case there’s any confusion, I made a little chart that could help them out."

    https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217876654

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Wed May 3 09:56:26 2023
    On 5/2/2023 11:51 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    "President Biden: I hear House Republicans out on TV saying they would never vote to cut veterans'...

    I hear House Republicans out on TV saying they would never vote to cut veterans’ benefits.

    In case there’s any confusion, I made a little chart that could help them out."

    https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217876654

    Dumbest flow chart ever. To be expected I guess from one of the best
    liars ever. Kind of embarrassing really.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)