This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you liberal
lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you liberal
lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more important than fairness?
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category, intends to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom surgery' next year
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you liberal
lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
important than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category, intends
to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom surgery' next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any money,'
she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to World
Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from elite female competition if they have gone through male puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all over the
UK and world run through the capital, is not subject to World
Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her decision to
run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my country because of
all the money I've raised' for the charity Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I cheated?
I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the male
category but I wasn't taking any advantage over another female.
I've just entered as a general public [participant] and I'm raising
money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes News
leaves out a lot of significant details to yank your chains.
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:
Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you liberal
lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
important than fairness?
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category, intends to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom surgery' next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any money,' she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to World Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from elite female competition if they have gone through male puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all over the UK and world run through the capital, is not subject to World Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her decision to run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my country because of all the money I've raised' for the charity Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I cheated? I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the male category but I wasn't taking any advantage over another female. I've just entered as a general public [participant] and I'm raising money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes News leaves out a lot of significant details to yank your chains.
TB
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you liberal
lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
important than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category, intends
to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom surgery' next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any money,'
she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to World
Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from elite female
competition if they have gone through male puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all over the
UK and world run through the capital, is not subject to World
Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her decision to
run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my country because of
all the money I've raised' for the charity Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I cheated?
I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the male
category but I wasn't taking any advantage over another female.
I've just entered as a general public [participant] and I'm raising
money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes News
leaves out a lot of significant details to yank your chains.
Do you personally think transwomen should be allowed to compete with
ciswomen in official competitions, and who do you think should decide
whether they are or aren't allowed in the competitions?
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you liberal
lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
important than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category, intends
to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom surgery' next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any money,'
she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to World
Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from elite female competition if they have gone through male puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all over the
UK and world run through the capital, is not subject to World
Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her decision to
run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my country because of
all the money I've raised' for the charity Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I cheated?
I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the male
category but I wasn't taking any advantage over another female.
I've just entered as a general public [participant] and I'm raising
money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes NewsDo you personally think transwomen should be allowed to compete with ciswomen in official competitions, and who do you think should decide whether they are or aren't allowed in the competitions?
leaves out a lot of significant details to yank your chains.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
On 4/27/2023 3:42 PM, bfh wrote:
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you liberal
lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
important than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category, intends
to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom surgery' next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any money,'
she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to World
Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from elite female
competition if they have gone through male puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all over the
UK and world run through the capital, is not subject to World
Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her decision to
run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my country because of
all the money I've raised' for the charity Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I cheated?
I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the male
category but I wasn't taking any advantage over another female.
I've just entered as a general public [participant] and I'm raising
money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes News
leaves out a lot of significant details to yank your chains.
Do you personally think transwomen should be allowed to compete with ciswomen in official competitions, and who do you think should decide whether they are or aren't allowed in the competitions?
Good luck getting an answer to that one. You may get a non-answer though.
--
Liberals suffer from cognitive dissonance. They know their political
views are nonsensical but they stick with them anyway.
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 1:42:17 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM UTC-7, bfh
wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you
liberal lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive
advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes Newsimportant than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category,
intends to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom surgery'
next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any
money,' she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to World
Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from elite
female competition if they have gone through male puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all over
the UK and world run through the capital, is not subject to
World Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her decision
to run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my country
because of all the money I've raised' for the charity
Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I
cheated? I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the male
category but I wasn't taking any advantage over another
female. I've just entered as a general public [participant] and
I'm raising money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
leaves out a lot of significant details to yank your chains.Do you personally think transwomen should be allowed to compete
with ciswomen in official competitions, and who do you think
should decide whether they are or aren't allowed in the
competitions? -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
You probably wouldn't like my answer, even if we could agree on
definitions. Right off the top, what would "official" mean? You
don't have to answer that because that's just one of the things we
would need to clarify and you probably aren't going to get a
satisfactory answer to your question, even if we dug through all of
that. Because, I seriously do not have a dog in this fight. With
rare exceptions I find competitive sports boring. I prefer doing
stuff to sitting and watching other people do stuff. The only time
I look at the sports page is if there's a good soap opera going
on.
Who decides is almost always a tough question. Politicians are
obviously a bad choice. I'm going to pick legitimate sports
federations for the win Monty. With the caveat that many of them
don't look all that legitimate from the outside. I think I could
live with the rules The World Athletes laid down for the "official"
marathon.
Sorry I could help you more, but I don't think my personal opinion
is all that important to the story. As always, I just get a kick
out of blowing holes in BULLSHIT.
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 1:42:17 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM UTC-7, bfh
wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you
liberal lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive
advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes Newsimportant than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category,
intends to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom surgery'
next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any
money,' she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to World
Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from elite
female competition if they have gone through male puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all over
the UK and world run through the capital, is not subject to
World Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her decision
to run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my country
because of all the money I've raised' for the charity
Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I
cheated? I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the male
category but I wasn't taking any advantage over another
female. I've just entered as a general public [participant] and
I'm raising money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
leaves out a lot of significant details to yank your chains.Do you personally think transwomen should be allowed to compete
with ciswomen in official competitions, and who do you think
should decide whether they are or aren't allowed in the
competitions? -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
You probably wouldn't like my answer, even if we could agree on definitions. Right off the top, what would "official" mean? You
don't have to answer that because that's just one of the things we
would need to clarify and you probably aren't going to get a
satisfactory answer to your question, even if we dug through all of
that. Because, I seriously do not have a dog in this fight. With
rare exceptions I find competitive sports boring. I prefer doing
stuff to sitting and watching other people do stuff. The only time
I look at the sports page is if there's a good soap opera going
on.
Who decides is almost always a tough question. Politicians are
obviously a bad choice. I'm going to pick legitimate sports
federations for the win Monty. With the caveat that many of them
don't look all that legitimate from the outside. I think I could
live with the rules The World Athletes laid down for the "official" marathon.
Sorry I could help you more, but I don't think my personal opinionLOL!
is all that important to the story. As always, I just get a kick
out of blowing holes in BULLSHIT.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 5:57:31 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 1:42:17 PM UTC-7, bfh
wrote:
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM >>>>> UTC-7, bfh wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you
liberal lunatics claim these "its" don't have a
competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes Newsimportant than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category,
intends to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom >>>>> surgery' next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any
money,' she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to
World Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from
elite female competition if they have gone through male
puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all
over the UK and world run through the capital, is not
subject to World Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her
decision to run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my
country because of all the money I've raised' for the
charity Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I
cheated? I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the
male category but I wasn't taking any advantage over
another female. I've just entered as a general public
[participant] and I'm raising money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
LOL! -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.leaves out a lot of significant details to yank yourDo you personally think transwomen should be allowed to
chains.
compete with ciswomen in official competitions, and who do
you think should decide whether they are or aren't allowed in
the competitions? -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't
work.
You probably wouldn't like my answer, even if we could agree
on definitions. Right off the top, what would "official" mean?
You don't have to answer that because that's just one of the
things we would need to clarify and you probably aren't going
to get a satisfactory answer to your question, even if we dug
through all of that. Because, I seriously do not have a dog in
this fight. With rare exceptions I find competitive sports
boring. I prefer doing stuff to sitting and watching other
people do stuff. The only time I look at the sports page is if
there's a good soap opera going on.
Who decides is almost always a tough question. Politicians are
obviously a bad choice. I'm going to pick legitimate sports
federations for the win Monty. With the caveat that many of
them don't look all that legitimate from the outside. I think I
could live with the rules The World Athletes laid down for the
"official" marathon.
Sorry I could help you more, but I don't think my personal
opinion is all that important to the story. As always, I just
get a kick out of blowing holes in BULLSHIT.
For some people this is important stuff. We would all like our body
to match our personal image of ourselves.
The former Bruce Jenner
was getting up there in years when she transitioned. Whatever Frank
raised for her favorite charity I'll bet she gets even more
donations after all the attention Fakes News gave to one person out
of 48,500 participants.
Statistically speaking it's extremely
likely that some of the 6,000+ women who beat Frank were also
trans.
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 5:57:31 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 1:42:17 PM UTC-7, bfh
wrote:
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM
UTC-7, bfh wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you
liberal lunatics claim these "its" don't have a
competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes Newsimportant than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category,
intends to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom >>>>> surgery' next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any
money,' she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to
World Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from
elite female competition if they have gone through male
puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all
over the UK and world run through the capital, is not
subject to World Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her
decision to run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my
country because of all the money I've raised' for the
charity Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I
cheated? I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the
male category but I wasn't taking any advantage over
another female. I've just entered as a general public
[participant] and I'm raising money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
LOL! -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.leaves out a lot of significant details to yank yourDo you personally think transwomen should be allowed to
chains.
compete with ciswomen in official competitions, and who do
you think should decide whether they are or aren't allowed in
the competitions? -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't
work.
You probably wouldn't like my answer, even if we could agree
on definitions. Right off the top, what would "official" mean?
You don't have to answer that because that's just one of the
things we would need to clarify and you probably aren't going
to get a satisfactory answer to your question, even if we dug
through all of that. Because, I seriously do not have a dog in
this fight. With rare exceptions I find competitive sports
boring. I prefer doing stuff to sitting and watching other
people do stuff. The only time I look at the sports page is if
there's a good soap opera going on.
Who decides is almost always a tough question. Politicians are
obviously a bad choice. I'm going to pick legitimate sports
federations for the win Monty. With the caveat that many of
them don't look all that legitimate from the outside. I think I
could live with the rules The World Athletes laid down for the
"official" marathon.
Sorry I could help you more, but I don't think my personal
opinion is all that important to the story. As always, I just
get a kick out of blowing holes in BULLSHIT.
For some people this is important stuff. We would all like our bodyYou're projecting (sort of) again - and you didn't do that well with
to match our personal image of ourselves.
your 'image' analysis of beer buyers.
The former Bruce JennerFakes is not the only one that covered it. Besides, do you literally
was getting up there in years when she transitioned. Whatever Frank
raised for her favorite charity I'll bet she gets even more
donations after all the attention Fakes News gave to one person out
of 48,500 participants.
think that Fakes readers are going to contribute? I thought they were
all transphobe MAGA rednecks. And the woke don't read Fakes.
Statistically speaking it's extremelyIf that extreme likelihood is statistically significant enough to be
likely that some of the 6,000+ women who beat Frank were also
trans.
actual, then I think it's uniquely possible that they're pissed
they're not getting attention, too.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 5:57:31 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 1:42:17 PM UTC-7, bfh
wrote:
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM
UTC-7, bfh wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you
liberal lunatics claim these "its" don't have a
competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes Newsimportant than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category,
intends to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom >>>>> surgery' next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any
money,' she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to
World Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from
elite female competition if they have gone through male
puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all
over the UK and world run through the capital, is not
subject to World Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her
decision to run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my
country because of all the money I've raised' for the
charity Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I
cheated? I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the
male category but I wasn't taking any advantage over
another female. I've just entered as a general public
[participant] and I'm raising money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
LOL! -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.leaves out a lot of significant details to yank yourDo you personally think transwomen should be allowed to
chains.
compete with ciswomen in official competitions, and who do
you think should decide whether they are or aren't allowed in
the competitions? -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't
work.
You probably wouldn't like my answer, even if we could agree
on definitions. Right off the top, what would "official" mean?
You don't have to answer that because that's just one of the
things we would need to clarify and you probably aren't going
to get a satisfactory answer to your question, even if we dug
through all of that. Because, I seriously do not have a dog in
this fight. With rare exceptions I find competitive sports
boring. I prefer doing stuff to sitting and watching other
people do stuff. The only time I look at the sports page is if
there's a good soap opera going on.
Who decides is almost always a tough question. Politicians are
obviously a bad choice. I'm going to pick legitimate sports
federations for the win Monty. With the caveat that many of
them don't look all that legitimate from the outside. I think I
could live with the rules The World Athletes laid down for the
"official" marathon.
Sorry I could help you more, but I don't think my personal
opinion is all that important to the story. As always, I just
get a kick out of blowing holes in BULLSHIT.
For some people this is important stuff. We would all like our bodyYou're projecting (sort of) again - and you didn't do that well with
to match our personal image of ourselves.
your 'image' analysis of beer buyers.
The former Bruce JennerFakes is not the only one that covered it. Besides, do you literally
was getting up there in years when she transitioned. Whatever Frank
raised for her favorite charity I'll bet she gets even more
donations after all the attention Fakes News gave to one person out
of 48,500 participants.
think that Fakes readers are going to contribute? I thought they were
all transphobe MAGA rednecks. And the woke don't read Fakes.
Statistically speaking it's extremelyIf that extreme likelihood is statistically significant enough to be
likely that some of the 6,000+ women who beat Frank were also
trans.
actual, then I think it's uniquely possible that they're pissed
they're not getting attention, too.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 2:24:17 PM UTC-7, George.Anthony wrote:
On 4/27/2023 3:42 PM, bfh wrote:
Technobarbarian wrote:Good luck getting an answer to that one. You may get a non-answer though.
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:55:24 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:Hey. Where you been, dude? Don't you know that inclusiveness is more
George.Anthony wrote:
This wannabe woman beat out ~14,000 real women and you liberal
lunatics claim these "its" don't have a competitive advantage.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/transgender-female-runner-beat-14000-women-london-marathon-offers-give-medal-back
important than fairness?
-- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Frank got a medal for finishing the race. They didn't win
anything.
"Frank, who finished 6,159th spot in the female category, intends
to spend around £15,000 on 'top and bottom surgery' next year
'But I didn't compete as an elite, so I didn't steal any money,'
she added.
The elite races in the London Marathon are subject to World
Athletics rules, which exclude transgender women from elite female
competition if they have gone through male puberty.
However the mass event, which saw 48,500 runners from all over the
UK and world run through the capital, is not subject to World
Athletics rules and is 'for everyone'.
Speaking to MailOnline yesterday, Frank defended her decision to
run in the marathon, saying she has 'served my country because of
all the money I've raised' for the charity Whizz-Kidz.
She said: 'How can they say that I've cheated, who have I cheated?
I did it in four hours and 11 minutes.
'I'm going to apologise, I should have entered under the male
category but I wasn't taking any advantage over another female.
I've just entered as a general public [participant] and I'm raising
money for charity.'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017655/Transgender-athlete-London-Marathon-offers-finishers-medal.html
Sometimes being inclusive is more important. As usual, Fakes News
leaves out a lot of significant details to yank your chains.
Do you personally think transwomen should be allowed to compete with
ciswomen in official competitions, and who do you think should decide
whether they are or aren't allowed in the competitions?
--
Liberals suffer from cognitive dissonance. They know their political
views are nonsensical but they stick with them anyway.
LOL, this from our shuck and jive expert. Just because I blow
holes in your BULLSHIT, that doesn't mean I owe you any answers about anything.
TB
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 94:24:57 |
| Calls: | 6,658 |
| Files: | 12,206 |
| Messages: | 5,334,353 |