A federal judge on Monday rejected former President Donald Trump’s argument that he has “absolute immunity†in response to a lawsuit
alleging he committed civil rights violations in his attempts to
challenge the 2020 presidential election results.
The lawsuit, filed by the NAACP, the Michigan Welfare Rights
Organization and others, accuses the former president and the
Republican National Committee of efforts to disenfranchise voters
through targeted harassment, intimidation and efforts to prevent the complete counting and certification of ballots after the 2020 election.
The ruling notes that Trump’s lawyers previously argued that he is “absolutely immune†from damages for his actions within the “outer perimeter†of his official responsibilities as president.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington sided with the civil
rights groups, writing that Trump’s conduct after the 2020 election was “purely political and therefore well beyond the contours of presidential immunity.â€
“If former President Trump disrupted the certification of the electoral vote count, as plaintiffs allege here, such actions would
not constitute executive action in defense of the Constitution,"
Sullivan wrote. "For these reasons, the court concludes that former President Trump is not immune from monetary damages in this suit."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-doesnt-absolute-immunity-efforts-overturn-2020-election-judge-sa-rcna59128
Sticky spaghetti, Batman! Hey! Maybe Walker can help pay for the
orange goon's attorneys in between paying for abortions! HawHawHaw!
kmiller wrote:
A federal judge on Monday rejected former President Donald Trump’s
argument that he has “absolute immunity†in response to a lawsuit
alleging he committed civil rights violations in his attempts to
challenge the 2020 presidential election results.
The lawsuit, filed by the NAACP, the Michigan Welfare Rights
Organization and others, accuses the former president and the
Republican National Committee of efforts to disenfranchise voters
through targeted harassment, intimidation and efforts to prevent the
complete counting and certification of ballots after the 2020 election.
The ruling notes that Trump’s lawyers previously argued that he is
“absolutely immune†from damages for his actions within the
“outer perimeter†of his official responsibilities as president. >>
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington sided with the civil
rights groups, writing that Trump’s conduct after the 2020 election >> was “purely political and therefore well beyond the contours of
presidential immunity.â€
“If former President Trump disrupted the certification of the
electoral vote count, as plaintiffs allege here, such actions would
not constitute executive action in defense of the Constitution,"
Sullivan wrote. "For these reasons, the court concludes that former
President Trump is not immune from monetary damages in this suit."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-doesnt-absolute-immunity-efforts-overturn-2020-election-judge-sa-rcna59128
Sticky spaghetti, Batman! Hey! Maybe Walker can help pay for the
orange goon's attorneys in between paying for abortions! HawHawHaw!
But no conviction yet. Don't give up, though - you wouldn't know what to
do with all the extra time.
On 11/29/2022 7:23 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
A federal judge on Monday rejected former President Donald
Trump’s argument that he has “absolute immunityâ€Â
in response to a lawsuit alleging he committed civil rights
violations in his attempts to challenge the 2020 presidential
election results.
The lawsuit, filed by the NAACP, the Michigan Welfare Rights
Organization and others, accuses the former president and the
Republican National Committee of efforts to disenfranchise voters
through targeted harassment, intimidation and efforts to prevent
the complete counting and certification of ballots after the 2020
election.
The ruling notes that Trump’s lawyers previously argued that
he is “absolutely immune†from damages for his actions
within the “outer perimeter†of his official >>> responsibilities as president.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington sided with the
civil rights groups, writing that Trump’s conduct after the
2020 election was “purely political and therefore well beyond
the contours of presidential immunity.â€Â
“If former President Trump disrupted the certification of the
electoral vote count, as plaintiffs allege here, such actions would
not constitute executive action in defense of the Constitution,"
Sullivan wrote. "For these reasons, the court concludes that former
President Trump is not immune from monetary damages in this suit."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-doesnt-absolute-immunity-efforts-overturn-2020-election-judge-sa-rcna59128
Sticky spaghetti, Batman! Hey! Maybe Walker can help pay for the
orange goon's attorneys in between paying for abortions! HawHawHaw!
But no conviction yet. Don't give up, though - you wouldn't know
what to do with all the extra time.
Does "extra time" make the end of day farther away? HawHawHaw!!!
kmiller wrote:
On 11/29/2022 7:23 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
A federal judge on Monday rejected former President Donald
Trump’s argument that he has “absolute immunityâ€Â
in response to a lawsuit alleging he committed civil rights
violations in his attempts to challenge the 2020 presidential
election results.
The lawsuit, filed by the NAACP, the Michigan Welfare Rights
Organization and others, accuses the former president and the
Republican National Committee of efforts to disenfranchise voters
through targeted harassment, intimidation and efforts to prevent the
complete counting and certification of ballots after the 2020 election. >>>>
The ruling notes that Trump’s lawyers previously argued that
he is “absolutely immune†from damages for his actions
within the “outer perimeter†of his official >>>> responsibilities as president.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington sided with the
civil rights groups, writing that Trump’s conduct after the
2020 election was “purely political and therefore well beyond
the contours of presidential immunity.â€Â
“If former President Trump disrupted the certification of the
electoral vote count, as plaintiffs allege here, such actions would
not constitute executive action in defense of the Constitution,"
Sullivan wrote. "For these reasons, the court concludes that former
President Trump is not immune from monetary damages in this suit."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-doesnt-absolute-immunity-efforts-overturn-2020-election-judge-sa-rcna59128
Sticky spaghetti, Batman! Hey! Maybe Walker can help pay for the
orange goon's attorneys in between paying for abortions! HawHawHaw!
But no conviction yet. Don't give up, though - you wouldn't know what
to do with all the extra time.
Does "extra time" make the end of day farther away? HawHawHaw!!!
The passage of time is significant.
On 11/30/2022 10:14 AM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 11/29/2022 7:23 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
A federal judge on Monday rejected former President Donald
Trump’s argument that he has “absolute immunityâ€Â
in response to a lawsuit alleging he committed civil rights
violations in his attempts to challenge the 2020 presidential
election results.
The lawsuit, filed by the NAACP, the Michigan Welfare Rights
Organization and others, accuses the former president and the
Republican National Committee of efforts to disenfranchise voters
through targeted harassment, intimidation and efforts to prevent the >>>> complete counting and certification of ballots after the 2020 election. >>>>
The ruling notes that Trump’s lawyers previously argued that
he is “absolutely immune†from damages for his actions
within the “outer perimeter†of his official >>>> responsibilities as president.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington sided with the
civil rights groups, writing that Trump’s conduct after the
2020 election was “purely political and therefore well beyond
the contours of presidential immunity.â€Â
“If former President Trump disrupted the certification of the
electoral vote count, as plaintiffs allege here, such actions would >>>> not constitute executive action in defense of the Constitution,"
Sullivan wrote. "For these reasons, the court concludes that former >>>> President Trump is not immune from monetary damages in this suit."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-doesnt-absolute-immunity-efforts-overturn-2020-election-judge-sa-rcna59128
Sticky spaghetti, Batman! Hey! Maybe Walker can help pay for the
orange goon's attorneys in between paying for abortions! HawHawHaw!
But no conviction yet. Don't give up, though - you wouldn't know what >>> to do with all the extra time.
Does "extra time" make the end of day farther away? HawHawHaw!!!
The passage of time is significant.
Extra significant!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 97:21:08 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,208 |
| Messages: | 5,334,526 |