On 02 Oct 2022, Rudy Canoza <rc@cap.con> posted some news:POh_K.112014$tRy7.30564@fx36.iad:
On 10/2/2022 6:10 AM, David Hartung wrote:
On 10/2/22 07:42, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <tIicnajLn_4ywKT-nZ2dnZfqn_pj4p2d@giganews.com>,
David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
attempt to overthrow the US government by using a mob to invade the
capital building is idiotic to the point of being unbelievable.
Too late. Judges have already recognised it as 14th Amendment
Section 3 insurrection and keeping participants out of elected
office.
Example please?
You are such a stupid fucking shitbag.
"Judge calls Jan. 6 an ‘insurrection,’ bars ‘Cowboys for
Trump’ founder from office" https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/06/judge-calls-jan-6-an-insurrection-bars- cowboys-for-trump-founder-from-office.html
*You have already commented on this*, *you stupid fucking asshole*
Obviously you thought you could improve on your personal definition of stupidity by demonstrating yours.
<https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp- content/uploads/2022/09/D101CV202200473-griffin.pdf>
Let's cite the specific language entered into record by the Judge from a notably left wing blue-voting parasitic state.
"The government of the United States has enacted laws designed, first, to protect itself and its authority as a government, and, secondly, its
control over those agencies to which, under the constitution and laws, it extends govermental regulation. For the former purpose, --namely, to
protect itself and its authority as a government,--it has enacted that
every person who incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in, any
rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or
the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, 'and any two or more persons in any state or territory who conspire to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy wara
against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof; or by force to prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, 'shall be visited with certain
penalties there named.
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority,--the open
and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty,
any person from obstruction or retarding the passage of the mail, and make
it the official duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring
them before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any
person or persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and
that their attemnpted arrest for such offense has ben opposed by such a number of persons as would constitute a general uprising in that
particular locality, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning
of the law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives
it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of law. It is not necessary
that there be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions should be
so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an
insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should
be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United States."
Now let's provide the cite this lazy purveyor of the law used to form and write his half-assed instructions and opinion.
https://cite.case.law/f/62/828/
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority, the open
and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty,
any person from obstructing or retarding the passage of the mail, and make
it the duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring them
before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any person or persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and that their attempted arrest for such offense has been opposed by such a number of persons as would constitute a general uprising in that particular
locality, and as threatens for the time being the civil and political authority, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning of the
law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other
inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives
it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of laAv. It is not necessary
that there should be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions should be so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should
be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United States. When men gather to resist the cml or political power of the United States, or to oppose the execution of its laws, and are in such force that the civil authorities are inadequate to put them down, and a considerable military force is needed to accomplish that result, they become
insurgents; and every person who knowingly incites, aids, or abets them,
no matter what his motUes may be, is likewise an insurgent. The penalty
for the offense is seA-ere, and, as I have said, is designed to protect
the government and its authority against direct attack. There are other provisions of law designed to protect those particular agencies which come within governmental control. To these I will now call your attention.
The mails are in the special keeping of the government and laws of the
United States. To insure their unhindered transmission, it is made an
offense to knowingly and willfully obstruct or retard the passage of the mail, or any carriage, horse, driver, or carrier carrying the same. It is also proAided that if two or more persons conspire together to commit
any offense against the United States and one or more of such parties do
any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, all the parties thereto shall be subject to a penalty. Any person knowingly and willfully doing
any act which contributes, or is calculated to contribute, to obstructing
or hindering the mails, or who knowingly and willfully takes a part in
such *831acts, no matter how trivial, if intentional, is guilty of
violating the first of these provisions; and any person who conspires with one or more persons, one of whom subsequently commits the offense, is likewise guilty of an offense against the United States. What constitutes conspiracy to hinder or obstruct the mails will be touched upon in
connection with the subject to which 1 now call your attention.
The constitution places the regulation of commerce between the several states, and between the states and foreign nations, within the keeping of
the United States government. Anything which is designed to be transported for commercial purposes from one state to another, and is actually in transit, and any passenger who is actually engaged in any such interstate commercial transaction, and any car or carriage actually transporting or engaged in transporting such passenger or thing, are the agencies and subject-matter of interstate commerce, and any conspiracy in restraint of such trade or commerce is an offense against the United States. To
restrain is to prohibit, limit, confine, or abridge a thing. The restraint may be permanent or temporary. It may be intended to prohibit, limit, or abridge for all time, or for a day only. The law draws no distinction in
this respect. Commerce of this character is intended to be free, except subject to regulation by law, at all times, and for all periods. Temporary restraint is therefore as intolerable as permanent, and practical
restraint by actual physical interference, as criminal as that which flows from the arrangements of business and organization. Any physical interference, therefore, which has the effect of restraining any
passenger, car, or thing constituting an element of interstate commerce, forms the foundation for this offense. But to complete this offense, as
also that of conspiracy to obstruct the mails, there must exist, in
addition to the overt act and purpose, the element of criminal conspiracy.
In Portland Oregon, businesses were burned and damaged in protest again
the federal government.
In Portland Oregon, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/07/21/portland-riots-read-out-july-21>
In Seattle washington, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://interdependentcourts.com/2021/01/24/another-federal-courthouse- attacked-by-a-mob/>
Are those attacks not the very definition of the cite and judge?
In article <thdblq$1odes$1@news.mixmin.net>
Lawless democrats <unequal@law.usa> wrote:
On 02 Oct 2022, Rudy Canoza <rc@cap.con> posted some
news:POh_K.112014$tRy7.30564@fx36.iad:
On 10/2/2022 6:10 AM, David Hartung wrote:
On 10/2/22 07:42, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <tIicnajLn_4ywKT-nZ2dnZfqn_pj4p2d@giganews.com>,
 David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
attempt to overthrow the US government by using a mob to invade the >>>>>> capital building is idiotic to the point of being unbelievable.
Too late. Judges have already recognised it as 14th Amendment
Section 3 insurrection and keeping participants out of elected
office.
Example please?
You are such a stupid fucking shitbag.
"Judge calls Jan. 6 an ‘insurrection,’ bars ‘Cowboys for >>> Trump’ founder from office"
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/06/judge-calls-jan-6-an-insurrection-bars-
cowboys-for-trump-founder-from-office.html
*You have already commented on this*, *you stupid fucking asshole*
Obviously you thought you could improve on your personal definition of
stupidity by demonstrating yours.
<https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-
content/uploads/2022/09/D101CV202200473-griffin.pdf>
Let's cite the specific language entered into record by the Judge from a
notably left wing blue-voting parasitic state.
"The government of the United States has enacted laws designed, first, to
protect itself and its authority as a government, and, secondly, its
control over those agencies to which, under the constitution and laws, it
extends govermental regulation. For the former purpose, --namely, to
protect itself and its authority as a government,--it has enacted that
every person who incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in, any
rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or
the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, 'and any two or more
persons in any state or territory who conspire to overthrow, put down, or
destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy wara
against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof; or by force to
prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law of the United States
contrary to the authority thereof, 'shall be visited with certain
penalties there named.
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority,--the open
and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a
city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty,
any person from obstruction or retarding the passage of the mail, and make >> it the official duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring
them before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any
person or persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and
that their attemnpted arrest for such offense has ben opposed by such a
number of persons as would constitute a general uprising in that
particular locality, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning
of the law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other
inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives
it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of law. It is not necessary
that there be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions should be >> so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an
insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in
opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should
be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United >> States."
Now let's provide the cite this lazy purveyor of the law used to form and
write his half-assed instructions and opinion.
https://cite.case.law/f/62/828/
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority, — the open >> and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a
city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty,
any person from obstructing or retarding the passage of the mail, and make >> it the duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring them
before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any person or >> persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and that their
attempted arrest for such offense has been opposed by such a number of
persons as would constitute a general uprising in that particular
locality, and as threatens for the time being the civil and political
authority, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning of the
law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other
inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives
it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of laAv. It is not necessary
that there should be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions
should be so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an
insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in
opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should
be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United >> States. When men gather to resist the cml or political power of the United >> States, or to oppose the execution of its laws, and are in such force that >> the civil authorities are inadequate to put them down, and a considerable
military force is needed to accomplish that result, they become
insurgents; and every person who knowingly incites, aids, or abets them,
no matter what his motUes may be, is likewise an insurgent. The penalty
for the offense is seA-ere, and, as I have said, is designed to protect
the government and its authority against direct attack. There are other
provisions of law designed to protect those particular agencies which come >> within governmental control. To these I will now call your attention.
The mails are in the special keeping of the government and laws of the
United States. To insure their unhindered transmission, it is made an
offense to knowingly and willfully obstruct or retard the passage of the
mail, or any carriage, horse, driver, or carrier carrying the same. It is
also proA’ided that “if two or more persons conspire together to commit >> any offense against the United States and one or more of such parties do
any act to effect the object of the conspiracy,” all the parties thereto >> shall be subject to a penalty. Any person knowingly and willfully doing
any act which contributes, or is calculated to contribute, to obstructing
or hindering the mails, or who knowingly and willfully takes a part in
such *831acts, no matter how trivial, if intentional, is guilty of
violating the first of these provisions; and any person who conspires with >> one or more persons, one of whom subsequently commits the offense, is
likewise guilty of an offense against the United States. What constitutes
conspiracy to hinder or obstruct the mails will be touched upon in
connection with the subject to which 1 now call your attention.
The constitution places the regulation of commerce between the several
states, and between the states and foreign nations, within the keeping of
the United States government. Anything which is designed to be transported >> for commercial purposes from one state to another, and is actually in
transit, and any passenger who’ is actually engaged in any such interstate >> commercial transaction, and any car or carriage actually transporting or
engaged in transporting such passenger or thing, are the agencies and
subject-matter of interstate commerce, and any conspiracy in restraint of
such trade or commerce is an offense against the United States. To
restrain is to prohibit, limit, confine, or abridge a thing. The restraint >> may be permanent or temporary. It may be intended to prohibit, limit, or
abridge for all time, or for a day only. The law draws no distinction in
this respect. Commerce of this character is intended to be free, except
subject to regulation by law, at all times, and for all periods. Temporary >> restraint is therefore as intolerable as permanent, and practical
restraint by actual physical interference, as criminal as that which flows >> from the arrangements of business and organization. Any physical
interference, therefore, which has the effect of restraining any
passenger, car, or thing constituting an element of interstate commerce,
forms the foundation for this offense. But to complete this offense, as
also that of conspiracy to obstruct the mails, there must exist, in
addition to the overt act and purpose, the element of criminal conspiracy. >>
In Portland Oregon, businesses were burned and damaged in protest again
the federal government.
In Portland Oregon, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/07/21/portland-riots-read-out-july-21>
In Seattle washington, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://interdependentcourts.com/2021/01/24/another-federal-courthouse-
attacked-by-a-mob/>
Are those attacks not the very definition of the cite and judge?
Yes they are.
Why weren't Antifa insurrectionists charged with insurrection?
Why weren't Antifa insurrectionists charged with insurrection?
An excellent question.
The same question applies for all of the "occupy" insurrections.
On 10/3/22 05:16, Mary E. Junck Chairman wrote:
In article <thdblq$1odes$1@news.mixmin.net>
Lawless democrats <unequal@law.usa> wrote:
On 02 Oct 2022, Rudy Canoza <rc@cap.con> posted some
news:POh_K.112014$tRy7.30564@fx36.iad:
On 10/2/2022 6:10 AM, David Hartung wrote:
On 10/2/22 07:42, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <tIicnajLn_4ywKT-nZ2dnZfqn_pj4p2d@giganews.com>,
 David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
attempt to overthrow the US government by using a mob to invade the >>>>>>> capital building is idiotic to the point of being unbelievable.
Too late. Judges have already recognised it as 14th Amendment
Section 3 insurrection and keeping participants out of elected
office.
Example please?
You are such a stupid fucking shitbag.
"Judge calls Jan. 6 an ‘insurrection,’ bars ‘Cowboys for
Trump’ founder from office"
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/06/judge-calls-jan-6-an-insurrection-bars- >>>> cowboys-for-trump-founder-from-office.html
*You have already commented on this*, *you stupid fucking asshole*
Obviously you thought you could improve on your personal definition of
stupidity by demonstrating yours.
<https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-
content/uploads/2022/09/D101CV202200473-griffin.pdf>
Let's cite the specific language entered into record by the Judge from a >>> notably left wing blue-voting parasitic state.
"The government of the United States has enacted laws designed, first, to >>> protect itself and its authority as a government, and, secondly, its
control over those agencies to which, under the constitution and laws, it >>> extends govermental regulation. For the former purpose, --namely, to
protect itself and its authority as a government,--it has enacted that
every person who incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in, any
rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or
the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, 'and any two or more
persons in any state or territory who conspire to overthrow, put down, or >>> destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy wara
against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof; or by force to >>> prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law of the United States
contrary to the authority thereof, 'shall be visited with certain
penalties there named.
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority,--the open >>> and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a >>> city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty, >>> any person from obstruction or retarding the passage of the mail, and make >>> it the official duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring >>> them before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any
person or persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and
that their attemnpted arrest for such offense has ben opposed by such a
number of persons as would constitute a general uprising in that
particular locality, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning >>> of the law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other >>> inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives >>> it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of law. It is not necessary >>> that there be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions should be >>> so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an
insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in
opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should >>> be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United >>> States."
Now let's provide the cite this lazy purveyor of the law used to form and >>> write his half-assed instructions and opinion.
https://cite.case.law/f/62/828/
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority, — the open >>> and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a >>> city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty, >>> any person from obstructing or retarding the passage of the mail, and make >>> it the duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring them
before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any person or >>> persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and that their
attempted arrest for such offense has been opposed by such a number of
persons as would constitute a general uprising in that particular
locality, and as threatens for the time being the civil and political
authority, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning of the
law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other
inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives >>> it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of laAv. It is not necessary >>> that there should be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions
should be so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an
insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in
opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should >>> be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United >>> States. When men gather to resist the cml or political power of the United >>> States, or to oppose the execution of its laws, and are in such force that >>> the civil authorities are inadequate to put them down, and a considerable >>> military force is needed to accomplish that result, they become
insurgents; and every person who knowingly incites, aids, or abets them, >>> no matter what his motUes may be, is likewise an insurgent. The penalty
for the offense is seA-ere, and, as I have said, is designed to protect
the government and its authority against direct attack. There are other
provisions of law designed to protect those particular agencies which come >>> within governmental control. To these I will now call your attention.
The mails are in the special keeping of the government and laws of the
United States. To insure their unhindered transmission, it is made an
offense to knowingly and willfully obstruct or retard the passage of the >>> mail, or any carriage, horse, driver, or carrier carrying the same. It is >>> also proA’ided that “if two or more persons conspire together to commit >>> any offense against the United States and one or more of such parties do >>> any act to effect the object of the conspiracy,” all the parties thereto >>> shall be subject to a penalty. Any person knowingly and willfully doing
any act which contributes, or is calculated to contribute, to obstructing >>> or hindering the mails, or who knowingly and willfully takes a part in
such *831acts, no matter how trivial, if intentional, is guilty of
violating the first of these provisions; and any person who conspires with >>> one or more persons, one of whom subsequently commits the offense, is
likewise guilty of an offense against the United States. What constitutes >>> conspiracy to hinder or obstruct the mails will be touched upon in
connection with the subject to which 1 now call your attention.
The constitution places the regulation of commerce between the several
states, and between the states and foreign nations, within the keeping of >>> the United States government. Anything which is designed to be transported >>> for commercial purposes from one state to another, and is actually in
transit, and any passenger who’ is actually engaged in any such interstate
commercial transaction, and any car or carriage actually transporting or >>> engaged in transporting such passenger or thing, are the agencies and
subject-matter of interstate commerce, and any conspiracy in restraint of >>> such trade or commerce is an offense against the United States. To
restrain is to prohibit, limit, confine, or abridge a thing. The restraint >>> may be permanent or temporary. It may be intended to prohibit, limit, or >>> abridge for all time, or for a day only. The law draws no distinction in >>> this respect. Commerce of this character is intended to be free, except
subject to regulation by law, at all times, and for all periods. Temporary >>> restraint is therefore as intolerable as permanent, and practical
restraint by actual physical interference, as criminal as that which flows >>> from the arrangements of business and organization. Any physical
interference, therefore, which has the effect of restraining any
passenger, car, or thing constituting an element of interstate commerce, >>> forms the foundation for this offense. But to complete this offense, as
also that of conspiracy to obstruct the mails, there must exist, in
addition to the overt act and purpose, the element of criminal conspiracy. >>>
In Portland Oregon, businesses were burned and damaged in protest again
the federal government.
In Portland Oregon, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/07/21/portland-riots-read-out-july-21>
In Seattle washington, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://interdependentcourts.com/2021/01/24/another-federal-courthouse- >>> attacked-by-a-mob/>
Are those attacks not the very definition of the cite and judge?
Yes they are.
Why weren't Antifa insurrectionists charged with insurrection?
An excellent question.
On 10/3/22 05:16, Mary E. Junck Chairman wrote:
In article <thdblq$1odes$1@news.mixmin.net>
Lawless democrats <unequal@law.usa> wrote:
On 02 Oct 2022, Rudy Canoza <rc@cap.con> posted some
news:POh_K.112014$tRy7.30564@fx36.iad:
On 10/2/2022 6:10 AM, David Hartung wrote:
On 10/2/22 07:42, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <tIicnajLn_4ywKT-nZ2dnZfqn_pj4p2d@giganews.com>,
 David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
attempt to overthrow the US government by using a mob to invade the >>>>>>> capital building is idiotic to the point of being unbelievable.
Too late. Judges have already recognised it as 14th Amendment
Section 3 insurrection and keeping participants out of elected
office.
Example please?
You are such a stupid fucking shitbag.
"Judge calls Jan. 6 an ‘insurrection,’ bars ‘Cowboys for
Trump’ founder from office"
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/06/judge-calls-jan-6-an-insurrection-bars- >>>> cowboys-for-trump-founder-from-office.html
*You have already commented on this*, *you stupid fucking asshole*
Obviously you thought you could improve on your personal definition of
stupidity by demonstrating yours.
<https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-
content/uploads/2022/09/D101CV202200473-griffin.pdf>
Let's cite the specific language entered into record by the Judge from a >>> notably left wing blue-voting parasitic state.
"The government of the United States has enacted laws designed, first, to >>> protect itself and its authority as a government, and, secondly, its
control over those agencies to which, under the constitution and laws, it >>> extends govermental regulation. For the former purpose, --namely, to
protect itself and its authority as a government,--it has enacted that
every person who incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in, any
rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or
the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, 'and any two or more
persons in any state or territory who conspire to overthrow, put down, or >>> destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy wara
against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof; or by force to >>> prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law of the United States
contrary to the authority thereof, 'shall be visited with certain
penalties there named.
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority,--the open >>> and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a >>> city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty, >>> any person from obstruction or retarding the passage of the mail, and make >>> it the official duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring >>> them before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any
person or persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and
that their attemnpted arrest for such offense has ben opposed by such a
number of persons as would constitute a general uprising in that
particular locality, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning >>> of the law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other >>> inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives >>> it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of law. It is not necessary >>> that there be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions should be >>> so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an
insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in
opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should >>> be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United >>> States."
Now let's provide the cite this lazy purveyor of the law used to form and >>> write his half-assed instructions and opinion.
https://cite.case.law/f/62/828/
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority, — the open >>> and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a >>> city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty, >>> any person from obstructing or retarding the passage of the mail, and make >>> it the duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring them
before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any person or >>> persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and that their
attempted arrest for such offense has been opposed by such a number of
persons as would constitute a general uprising in that particular
locality, and as threatens for the time being the civil and political
authority, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning of the
law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other
inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives >>> it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of laAv. It is not necessary >>> that there should be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions
should be so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an
insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in
opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should >>> be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United >>> States. When men gather to resist the cml or political power of the United >>> States, or to oppose the execution of its laws, and are in such force that >>> the civil authorities are inadequate to put them down, and a considerable >>> military force is needed to accomplish that result, they become
insurgents; and every person who knowingly incites, aids, or abets them, >>> no matter what his motUes may be, is likewise an insurgent. The penalty
for the offense is seA-ere, and, as I have said, is designed to protect
the government and its authority against direct attack. There are other
provisions of law designed to protect those particular agencies which come >>> within governmental control. To these I will now call your attention.
The mails are in the special keeping of the government and laws of the
United States. To insure their unhindered transmission, it is made an
offense to knowingly and willfully obstruct or retard the passage of the >>> mail, or any carriage, horse, driver, or carrier carrying the same. It is >>> also proA’ided that “if two or more persons conspire together to commit >>> any offense against the United States and one or more of such parties do >>> any act to effect the object of the conspiracy,” all the parties thereto >>> shall be subject to a penalty. Any person knowingly and willfully doing
any act which contributes, or is calculated to contribute, to obstructing >>> or hindering the mails, or who knowingly and willfully takes a part in
such *831acts, no matter how trivial, if intentional, is guilty of
violating the first of these provisions; and any person who conspires with >>> one or more persons, one of whom subsequently commits the offense, is
likewise guilty of an offense against the United States. What constitutes >>> conspiracy to hinder or obstruct the mails will be touched upon in
connection with the subject to which 1 now call your attention.
The constitution places the regulation of commerce between the several
states, and between the states and foreign nations, within the keeping of >>> the United States government. Anything which is designed to be transported >>> for commercial purposes from one state to another, and is actually in
transit, and any passenger who’ is actually engaged in any such interstate
commercial transaction, and any car or carriage actually transporting or >>> engaged in transporting such passenger or thing, are the agencies and
subject-matter of interstate commerce, and any conspiracy in restraint of >>> such trade or commerce is an offense against the United States. To
restrain is to prohibit, limit, confine, or abridge a thing. The restraint >>> may be permanent or temporary. It may be intended to prohibit, limit, or >>> abridge for all time, or for a day only. The law draws no distinction in >>> this respect. Commerce of this character is intended to be free, except
subject to regulation by law, at all times, and for all periods. Temporary >>> restraint is therefore as intolerable as permanent, and practical
restraint by actual physical interference, as criminal as that which flows >>> from the arrangements of business and organization. Any physical
interference, therefore, which has the effect of restraining any
passenger, car, or thing constituting an element of interstate commerce, >>> forms the foundation for this offense. But to complete this offense, as
also that of conspiracy to obstruct the mails, there must exist, in
addition to the overt act and purpose, the element of criminal conspiracy. >>>
In Portland Oregon, businesses were burned and damaged in protest again
the federal government.
In Portland Oregon, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/07/21/portland-riots-read-out-july-21>
In Seattle washington, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://interdependentcourts.com/2021/01/24/another-federal-courthouse- >>> attacked-by-a-mob/>
Are those attacks not the very definition of the cite and judge?
Yes they are.
Why weren't Antifa insurrectionists charged with insurrection?
An excellent question.
On 10/3/22 09:06, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 10/3/2022 5:17 AM, David Hartung wrote:
On 10/3/22 05:16, Mary E. Junck Chairman wrote:
In article <thdblq$1odes$1@news.mixmin.net>
Lawless democrats <unequal@law.usa> wrote:
On 02 Oct 2022, Rudy Canoza <rc@cap.con> posted some
news:POh_K.112014$tRy7.30564@fx36.iad:
On 10/2/2022 6:10 AM, David Hartung wrote:
On 10/2/22 07:42, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <tIicnajLn_4ywKT-nZ2dnZfqn_pj4p2d@giganews.com>,
 David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
attempt to overthrow the US government by using a mob to invade the >>>>>>>>> capital building is idiotic to the point of being unbelievable. >>>>>>>>Too late. Judges have already recognised it as 14th Amendment
Section 3 insurrection and keeping participants out of elected >>>>>>>> office.
Example please?
You are such a stupid fucking shitbag.
"Judge calls Jan. 6 an ‘insurrection,’ bars ‘Cowboys for
Trump’ founder from office"
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/06/judge-calls-jan-6-an-insurrection-bars- >>>>>> cowboys-for-trump-founder-from-office.html
*You have already commented on this*, *you stupid fucking asshole*
Obviously you thought you could improve on your personal definition of >>>>> stupidity by demonstrating yours.
<https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-
content/uploads/2022/09/D101CV202200473-griffin.pdf>
Let's cite the specific language entered into record by the Judge from a >>>>> notably left wing blue-voting parasitic state.
"The government of the United States has enacted laws designed, first, to >>>>> protect itself and its authority as a government, and, secondly, its >>>>> control over those agencies to which, under the constitution and laws, it >>>>> extends govermental regulation. For the former purpose, --namely, to >>>>> protect itself and its authority as a government,--it has enacted that >>>>> every person who incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in, any
rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or >>>>> the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, 'and any two or more >>>>> persons in any state or territory who conspire to overthrow, put down, or >>>>> destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy wara >>>>> against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof; or by force to >>>>> prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law of the United States >>>>> contrary to the authority thereof, 'shall be visited with certain
penalties there named.
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority,--the open >>>>> and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a >>>>> city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty,
any person from obstruction or retarding the passage of the mail, and make
it the official duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring >>>>> them before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any >>>>> person or persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and >>>>> that their attemnpted arrest for such offense has ben opposed by such a >>>>> number of persons as would constitute a general uprising in that
particular locality, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning >>>>> of the law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other >>>>> inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives >>>>> it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of law. It is not necessary >>>>> that there be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions should be
so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an
insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in >>>>> opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should >>>>> be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United
States."
Now let's provide the cite this lazy purveyor of the law used to form and >>>>> write his half-assed instructions and opinion.
https://cite.case.law/f/62/828/
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority, — the open
and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a >>>>> city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under penalty, >>>>> any person from obstructing or retarding the passage of the mail, and make
it the duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring them >>>>> before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any person or
persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and that their >>>>> attempted arrest for such offense has been opposed by such a number of >>>>> persons as would constitute a general uprising in that particular
locality, and as threatens for the time being the civil and political >>>>> authority, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning of the >>>>> law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other
inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or gives >>>>> it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of laAv. It is not necessary >>>>> that there should be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions >>>>> should be so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an >>>>> insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in >>>>> opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and should >>>>> be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the United
States. When men gather to resist the cml or political power of the United
States, or to oppose the execution of its laws, and are in such force that
the civil authorities are inadequate to put them down, and a considerable >>>>> military force is needed to accomplish that result, they become
insurgents; and every person who knowingly incites, aids, or abets them, >>>>> no matter what his motUes may be, is likewise an insurgent. The penalty >>>>> for the offense is seA-ere, and, as I have said, is designed to protect >>>>> the government and its authority against direct attack. There are other >>>>> provisions of law designed to protect those particular agencies which come
within governmental control. To these I will now call your attention. >>>>>
The mails are in the special keeping of the government and laws of the >>>>> United States. To insure their unhindered transmission, it is made an >>>>> offense to knowingly and willfully obstruct or retard the passage of the >>>>> mail, or any carriage, horse, driver, or carrier carrying the same. It is >>>>> also proA’ided that “if two or more persons conspire together to commit
any offense against the United States and one or more of such parties do >>>>> any act to effect the object of the conspiracy,” all the parties thereto
shall be subject to a penalty. Any person knowingly and willfully doing >>>>> any act which contributes, or is calculated to contribute, to obstructing >>>>> or hindering the mails, or who knowingly and willfully takes a part in >>>>> such *831acts, no matter how trivial, if intentional, is guilty of
violating the first of these provisions; and any person who conspires with
one or more persons, one of whom subsequently commits the offense, is >>>>> likewise guilty of an offense against the United States. What constitutes >>>>> conspiracy to hinder or obstruct the mails will be touched upon in
connection with the subject to which 1 now call your attention.
The constitution places the regulation of commerce between the several >>>>> states, and between the states and foreign nations, within the keeping of >>>>> the United States government. Anything which is designed to be transported
for commercial purposes from one state to another, and is actually in >>>>> transit, and any passenger who’ is actually engaged in any such interstate
commercial transaction, and any car or carriage actually transporting or >>>>> engaged in transporting such passenger or thing, are the agencies and >>>>> subject-matter of interstate commerce, and any conspiracy in restraint of >>>>> such trade or commerce is an offense against the United States. To
restrain is to prohibit, limit, confine, or abridge a thing. The restraint
may be permanent or temporary. It may be intended to prohibit, limit, or >>>>> abridge for all time, or for a day only. The law draws no distinction in >>>>> this respect. Commerce of this character is intended to be free, except >>>>> subject to regulation by law, at all times, and for all periods. Temporary
restraint is therefore as intolerable as permanent, and practical
restraint by actual physical interference, as criminal as that which flows
from the arrangements of business and organization. Any physical
interference, therefore, which has the effect of restraining any
passenger, car, or thing constituting an element of interstate commerce, >>>>> forms the foundation for this offense. But to complete this offense, as >>>>> also that of conspiracy to obstruct the mails, there must exist, in
addition to the overt act and purpose, the element of criminal conspiracy.
In Portland Oregon, businesses were burned and damaged in protest again >>>>> the federal government.
In Portland Oregon, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/07/21/portland-riots-read-out-july-21> >>>>>
In Seattle washington, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://interdependentcourts.com/2021/01/24/another-federal-courthouse- >>>>> attacked-by-a-mob/>
Are those attacks not the very definition of the cite and judge?
Yes they are.
Why weren't Antifa insurrectionists
An excellent question.
No. Those really were only riots. They were not intended to change the >> government. The Jan 06 insurrection *was* intended to change the government.
Both declared their areas to be autonomous from duly constituted government.
On 10/3/2022 5:17 AM, David Hartung wrote:
On 10/3/22 05:16, Mary E. Junck Chairman wrote:
In article <thdblq$1odes$1@news.mixmin.net>
Lawless democrats <unequal@law.usa> wrote:
On 02 Oct 2022, Rudy Canoza <rc@cap.con> posted some
news:POh_K.112014$tRy7.30564@fx36.iad:
On 10/2/2022 6:10 AM, David Hartung wrote:
On 10/2/22 07:42, Siri Cruise wrote:
In article <tIicnajLn_4ywKT-nZ2dnZfqn_pj4p2d@giganews.com>,
 David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
attempt to overthrow the US government by using a mob to invade the >>>>>>>> capital building is idiotic to the point of being unbelievable. >>>>>>>Too late. Judges have already recognised it as 14th Amendment
Section 3 insurrection and keeping participants out of elected
office.
Example please?
You are such a stupid fucking shitbag.
"Judge calls Jan. 6 an ‘insurrection,’ bars ‘Cowboys for
Trump’ founder from office"
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/06/judge-calls-jan-6-an-insurrection-bars- >>>>>
cowboys-for-trump-founder-from-office.html
*You have already commented on this*, *you stupid fucking asshole*
Obviously you thought you could improve on your personal definition of >>>> stupidity by demonstrating yours.
<https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-
content/uploads/2022/09/D101CV202200473-griffin.pdf>
Let's cite the specific language entered into record by the Judge
from a
notably left wing blue-voting parasitic state.
"The government of the United States has enacted laws designed,
first, to
protect itself and its authority as a government, and, secondly, its
control over those agencies to which, under the constitution and
laws, it
extends govermental regulation. For the former purpose, --namely, to >>>> protect itself and its authority as a government,--it has enacted that >>>> every person who incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in, any
rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or >>>> the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, 'and any two or more >>>> persons in any state or territory who conspire to overthrow, put
down, or
destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy wara
against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof; or by
force to
prevent, hinder or delay the execution of any law of the United States >>>> contrary to the authority thereof, 'shall be visited with certain
penalties there named.
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority,--the
open
and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law
in a
city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under
penalty,
any person from obstruction or retarding the passage of the mail,
and make
it the official duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and
bring
them before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any >>>> person or persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and >>>> that their attemnpted arrest for such offense has ben opposed by such a >>>> number of persons as would constitute a general uprising in that
particular locality, then the fact of an insurrection, within the
meaning
of the law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or
other
inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or
gives
it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of law. It is not
necessary
that there be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions
should be
so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an
insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in >>>> opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and
should
be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the
United
States."
Now let's provide the cite this lazy purveyor of the law used to
form and
write his half-assed instructions and opinion.
https://cite.case.law/f/62/828/
Insurrection is a rising against civil or political authority, — the >>>> open
and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law
in a
city or state. Now, the laws of the United States forbid, under
penalty,
any person from obstructing or retarding the passage of the mail,
and make
it the duty of the officers to arrest such offenders, and bring them
before the court. If, therefore, it shall appear to you that any
person or
persons have willfully obstructed or retarded the mails, and that their >>>> attempted arrest for such offense has been opposed by such a number of >>>> persons as would constitute a general uprising in that particular
locality, and as threatens for the time being the civil and political
authority, then the fact of an insurrection, within the meaning of the >>>> law, has been established; and he who by speech, writing, or other
inducement assists in setting it on foot, or carrying it along, or
gives
it aid or comfort, is guilty of a violation of laAv. It is not
necessary
that there should be bloodshed; it is not necessary that its dimensions >>>> should be so portentous as to insure probable success, to constitute an >>>> insurrection. It is necessary, however, that the rising should be in
opposition to the execution of the laws of the United States, and
should
be so formidable as for the time being to defy the authority of the
United
States. When men gather to resist the cml or political power of the
United
States, or to oppose the execution of its laws, and are in such
force that
the civil authorities are inadequate to put them down, and a
considerable
military force is needed to accomplish that result, they become
insurgents; and every person who knowingly incites, aids, or abets
them,
no matter what his motUes may be, is likewise an insurgent. The penalty >>>> for the offense is seA-ere, and, as I have said, is designed to protect >>>> the government and its authority against direct attack. There are other >>>> provisions of law designed to protect those particular agencies
which come
within governmental control. To these I will now call your attention.
The mails are in the special keeping of the government and laws of the >>>> United States. To insure their unhindered transmission, it is made an
offense to knowingly and willfully obstruct or retard the passage of
the
mail, or any carriage, horse, driver, or carrier carrying the same.
It is
also proA’ided that “if two or more persons conspire together to commit
any offense against the United States and one or more of such
parties do
any act to effect the object of the conspiracy,” all the parties
thereto
shall be subject to a penalty. Any person knowingly and willfully doing >>>> any act which contributes, or is calculated to contribute, to
obstructing
or hindering the mails, or who knowingly and willfully takes a part in >>>> such *831acts, no matter how trivial, if intentional, is guilty of
violating the first of these provisions; and any person who
conspires with
one or more persons, one of whom subsequently commits the offense, is
likewise guilty of an offense against the United States. What
constitutes
conspiracy to hinder or obstruct the mails will be touched upon in
connection with the subject to which 1 now call your attention.
The constitution places the regulation of commerce between the several >>>> states, and between the states and foreign nations, within the
keeping of
the United States government. Anything which is designed to be
transported
for commercial purposes from one state to another, and is actually in
transit, and any passenger who’ is actually engaged in any such
interstate
commercial transaction, and any car or carriage actually
transporting or
engaged in transporting such passenger or thing, are the agencies and
subject-matter of interstate commerce, and any conspiracy in
restraint of
such trade or commerce is an offense against the United States. To
restrain is to prohibit, limit, confine, or abridge a thing. The
restraint
may be permanent or temporary. It may be intended to prohibit,
limit, or
abridge for all time, or for a day only. The law draws no
distinction in
this respect. Commerce of this character is intended to be free, except >>>> subject to regulation by law, at all times, and for all periods.
Temporary
restraint is therefore as intolerable as permanent, and practical
restraint by actual physical interference, as criminal as that which
flows
from the arrangements of business and organization. Any physical
interference, therefore, which has the effect of restraining any
passenger, car, or thing constituting an element of interstate
commerce,
forms the foundation for this offense. But to complete this offense, as >>>> also that of conspiracy to obstruct the mails, there must exist, in
addition to the overt act and purpose, the element of criminal
conspiracy.
In Portland Oregon, businesses were burned and damaged in protest again >>>> the federal government.
In Portland Oregon, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/07/21/portland-riots-read-out-july-21>
In Seattle washington, federal buildings were attacked and damaged.
<https://interdependentcourts.com/2021/01/24/another-federal-courthouse- >>>>
attacked-by-a-mob/>
Are those attacks not the very definition of the cite and judge?
Yes they are.
Why weren't Antifa insurrectionists charged with insurrection?
An excellent question.
No. Those really were only riots. They were not intended to change the government. The Jan 06 insurrection *was* intended to change the government.
The Jan 6 fiasco was nothing more than an unorganized riot that the
Democrats are using as a tool to discredit their opponents.
The Jan 6 fiasco was nothing more than an unorganized riot that
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 96:09:46 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,206 |
| Messages: | 5,334,481 |