• =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Garland_Moves_to_Release_Details_on_Search_of_Trump?= =

    From kmiller@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Thu Aug 11 19:05:41 2022
    On 8/11/2022 6:28 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:

    "Garland Moves to Release Details on Search of Trump’s Home

    The attorney general said he had personally approved the search after
    “less intrusive” attempts to retrieve potentially classified documents had failed."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/11/us/politics/trump-fbi-subpoena.html

         Better still, we have more conspiracy theory material.

    "Mar-A-Lago search reveals a screw-up by same Trump lawyer who repped
    Bannon at recent trial: legal experts"

    https://www.rawstory.com/mar-a-lago-search-reveals-massive-screw-up-by-same-trump-lawyer-who-repped-bannon-at-recent-trial/


    TB

    Not only was he the worst president in history but he's also the worst ex-president in history! HawHawHaw!

    To paraphrase: "Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up!"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kmiller@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Fri Aug 12 17:26:24 2022
    On 8/11/2022 6:28 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:

    "Garland Moves to Release Details on Search of Trump’s Home

    The attorney general said he had personally approved the search after
    “less intrusive” attempts to retrieve potentially classified documents had failed."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/11/us/politics/trump-fbi-subpoena.html

         Better still, we have more conspiracy theory material.

    "Mar-A-Lago search reveals a screw-up by same Trump lawyer who repped
    Bannon at recent trial: legal experts"

    https://www.rawstory.com/mar-a-lago-search-reveals-massive-screw-up-by-same-trump-lawyer-who-repped-bannon-at-recent-trial/


    TB

    Certainly, an FBI search of a former president’s home appears
    unprecedented and the FBI isn’t without blemish, having applied the law questionably and even unjustly in the past. In this case, though, the agency’s director, Christopher Wray, was appointed by Trump. Garland,
    who directly signed off on the search, remains highly respected by
    members of both parties and has appeared to handle any probes involving
    Trump discreetly and professionally.

    We’re inclined to give Garland the benefit of the doubt mostly because
    he hasn’t given us any reason not to. We can’t say the same for the twice-impeached former president who is currently under multiple
    criminal, civil and congressional investigations and stands credibly
    accused of plotting a coup against American democracy.

    Trump has every right to defend himself, in a court of law and in the
    court of public opinion. But rampant assertions of Trump’s victimhood
    appear baseless.

    In fact, 15 boxes worth of documents had already been found at his home
    months prior to this week’s search. Trump’s lawyers claim that he had declassified some of the documents before he left office but whether he followed proper procedure to do so is another matter. He has also
    reportedly been known to destroy documents, just ripping them up in
    plain sight of staff. Remember the White House toilets that just
    wouldn’t flush right? And though Trump tried to claim the search came
    “out of nowhere and with no warning,” Garland said it was conducted only after “less intrusive” efforts to secure more documents failed.

    So, yes, there are plenty of reasons to be skeptical of Trump’s claim
    that the search was “prosecutorial misconduct” and “the weaponization of the Justice Department.” But now there’s also, perhaps, a reason to be scared.

    https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/Editorial-Trump-had-nothing-to-hide-from-FBI-17370143.php

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)