Hello Everyone,when the slideouts are extended.
I thought I had finished my design work last year but then decided to add another embodiment to my patent application. This embodiment has an entry door in a slideout above the right rear wheels which makes the interior of the motorhome even bigger
This idea was introduced by Peterson Industries in 2013 for their fifth-wheel trailers.
https://rvbusiness.com/peterson-unveils-slideout-entry-door-on-excel/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GE8BJ8wr8X0&t=306s
However, this company is no longer in business and I don't see anybody else using this idea so I'm wondering if it's because most people didn't like it.
One problem is that it takes a lot of room to lower the steps and the door can only be opened with the steps lowered but this problem is less serious for a motorhome with two more entry doors in the front.
Also if the steps can be swung by 180 degrees into a storage space rearward of the entry door it would be possible to open the door even when there is no room to lower the steps. Then a step ladder can be used to enter and exit the vehicle.
I also prefer having the awning mounted to the slideout above the entry door to having it mounted to a fixed side wall of the motorhome because it's nice to be able to lower the awning to block the sun with the slideout extended.
Please let me know what you think if anybody here is still interested in RV's.
BTW, this is what my design looks like on the outside. www.atardis.com/atardis.jpg
It also has a slideout on the left side but it's not possible to tell from looking at this AutoCAD rendering.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
...
I looked at your jpeg. There's no design there. That's just a box
diagram of a basic small class C.
TB
On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:
...
I looked at your jpeg. There's no design there. That's just a box
diagram of a basic small class C.
TB
Yes but I told you at the beginning of the year that my design could look a lot like other small motorhomes on the outside.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:
...Yes but I told you at the beginning of the year that my design could look a lot like other small motorhomes on the outside.
I looked at your jpeg. There's no design there. That's just a box
diagram of a basic small class C.
TB
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
...
Maybe so, but your "diagram" doesn't convey any information about
your design. Looking at it is a complete waste of time.
TB
On Tuesday, June 14, 2022 at 8:13:48 PM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:
...
Maybe so, but your "diagram" doesn't convey any information about
your design. Looking at it is a complete waste of time.
TB
Sorry I was just kidding.
Here is another embodiment included in my patent application that looks a little more interesting on the outside.
www.atardis.com/atardis.jpe
The deck cover can be partially lowered so that it rests on top of the four hinged panels to provide another enclosed sleeping compartment. This makes it possible to have 13 people sleeping in 7 beds on the inside.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
hmmmmm, odd concept. So you thank people for their opinions by
wasting their time? You might want to look up "passive/aggressive" some time. It's one of those jokes that's only funny for the person telling it.
As with many of your designs, it raises more questions than it
answers. Will there be seating for all 13 people with seat belts when
that thing is going down the road? Do you envision a support vehicle to carry their clothing, food and gear? Have you settled on a vehicle to
carry all that weight? Is there a vehicle that will handle all that
weight and a high center of gravity? What sort of idiot do you imagine buying this thing? Big families with money to burn? Some sort of crazy
RV club?
TB
On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 7:16:01 PM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:and dogs and doesn't take up that much space when it's retracted. Without these extra beds and with the over-cab compartment used for storage there are only enough beds left for 6 people.
hmmmmm, odd concept. So you thank people for their opinions by
wasting their time? You might want to look up "passive/aggressive" some
time. It's one of those jokes that's only funny for the person telling it. >>
As with many of your designs, it raises more questions than it
answers. Will there be seating for all 13 people with seat belts when
that thing is going down the road? Do you envision a support vehicle to
carry their clothing, food and gear? Have you settled on a vehicle to
carry all that weight? Is there a vehicle that will handle all that
weight and a high center of gravity? What sort of idiot do you imagine
buying this thing? Big families with money to burn? Some sort of crazy
RV club?
TB
I was kidding but not lying when I said I had told you so, i.e. that my designs could look a lot like other small motorhomes on the outside.
The AutoCAD rendering I posted (atardis.jpg) shows the exterior of my actual design that contains everything mentioned on my website so it wasn't a joke.
The law firm that worked for me advised me not to disclose the details until after filing my regular patent application. The deadline for that is coming up in a few months and the patent office will publish my designs early next year.
I put a king-size mattress on the roof deck because there is enough room for it but it is more important to be able to set up a table and chairs up there. The retractable rear enclosure with a double bed is included because it can also accommodate cats
It's the same thing with the 15 sq.ft. worksurface area. Some people may say that nobody needs it in a 20-foot motorhome but if there is room for it in the kitchen then I think it should be made available for those who really like to cook.by a ladder although it would be easy to provide additional side enclosures as seen on boats everywhere.
I have seen small motorhomes that are more top heavy such as the SAIC Maxus V90 Villa Edition with a retractable fully-enclosed second story accessible by an elevator. I think it's just as good to have a partially enclosed covered roof deck accessible
Atardis Motorhome Design
www.atardis.com
...
IOW you have no idea whether or not this RV will be stable going
down the road. If this idea ever gets past the dream stage someone will
have to sit down and figure this out for real.
For now I have one last question. Why in the world are you spending
money on this ridiculous idea? I'm wildly assuming you have something patent-able here? Unless you have a new design the slides are not and
it's unlikely that a novel arrangement of slides could be patented. Who
do you think will buy this idea? What do you think they would be willing
to pay? And who do you think they would sell those RVs to?
TB
...
IOW you have no idea whether or not this RV will be stable going
down the road. If this idea ever gets past the dream stage someone will
have to sit down and figure this out for real.
For now I have one last question. Why in the world are you spending
money on this ridiculous idea? I'm wildly assuming you have something patent-able here? Unless you have a new design the slides are not and
it's unlikely that a novel arrangement of slides could be patented. Who
do you think will buy this idea? What do you think they would be willing
to pay? And who do you think they would sell those RVs to?
TB
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 10:22:29 AM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:it will cost twice or 3 times as much. The retractable rear enclosure is not patentable because it has been built for other motorhomes, trailers and truck campers in the same way.
...
IOW you have no idea whether or not this RV will be stable going
down the road. If this idea ever gets past the dream stage someone will
have to sit down and figure this out for real.
For now I have one last question. Why in the world are you spending
money on this ridiculous idea? I'm wildly assuming you have something
patent-able here? Unless you have a new design the slides are not and
it's unlikely that a novel arrangement of slides could be patented. Who
do you think will buy this idea? What do you think they would be willing
to pay? And who do you think they would sell those RVs to?
TB
Others have built more top heavy motorhomes so they have already done a lot of work for me.
SAIC Maxus V90 Villa Edition
Protec Q18 (2.3 m - 3.5 m W x 3.35 m H)
Beauer Cell-car 3XC (single or double cab)
Host Custom Expedition Camper (3 slideouts)
And many other expedition trucks
My deck cover and the four hinged panels won't weigh that much because they don't have to support anything other than solar panels. The deck cover is not meant to be walked on and will break if somebody tries to walk on it.
But my deck design isn't even a feature I'm trying to patent. I just included it in my patent application as a free gift for anybody who wants to use this idea. I can only patent one thing at a time so if I want to patent two or three different things
I still haven't shown the feature I want to patent for the reason stated earlier. The law firm that did the patent search for me didn't find anything close to it and said that it should be patentable unless somebody else has come up with a similar ideajust before I filed my patent application last year. It's just another feature that enables the total length to be substantially reduced while keeping all of the amenities I would like to have. It won't cost that much to make and won't add that much
Even though it can sleep up to 13 people in 7 beds, I think my designs will be more suitable for 2 people who want to be in separate rooms from time to time, as well as for a family of up to 6 people on short vacations who want a small vehicle that iseasy to drive and park.
Atardis Motorhome Design
www.atardis.com
On 6/16/2022 6:52 PM, Catmobile wrote:things it will cost twice or 3 times as much. The retractable rear enclosure is not patentable because it has been built for other motorhomes, trailers and truck campers in the same way.
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 10:22:29 AM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:
...
IOW you have no idea whether or not this RV will be stable going
down the road. If this idea ever gets past the dream stage someone will >> have to sit down and figure this out for real.
For now I have one last question. Why in the world are you spending
money on this ridiculous idea? I'm wildly assuming you have something
patent-able here? Unless you have a new design the slides are not and
it's unlikely that a novel arrangement of slides could be patented. Who >> do you think will buy this idea? What do you think they would be willing >> to pay? And who do you think they would sell those RVs to?
TB
Others have built more top heavy motorhomes so they have already done a lot of work for me.
SAIC Maxus V90 Villa Edition
Protec Q18 (2.3 m - 3.5 m W x 3.35 m H)
Beauer Cell-car 3XC (single or double cab)
Host Custom Expedition Camper (3 slideouts)
And many other expedition trucks
My deck cover and the four hinged panels won't weigh that much because they don't have to support anything other than solar panels. The deck cover is not meant to be walked on and will break if somebody tries to walk on it.
But my deck design isn't even a feature I'm trying to patent. I just included it in my patent application as a free gift for anybody who wants to use this idea. I can only patent one thing at a time so if I want to patent two or three different
idea just before I filed my patent application last year. It's just another feature that enables the total length to be substantially reduced while keeping all of the amenities I would like to have. It won't cost that much to make and won't add that muchI still haven't shown the feature I want to patent for the reason stated earlier. The law firm that did the patent search for me didn't find anything close to it and said that it should be patentable unless somebody else has come up with a similar
is easy to drive and park.Even though it can sleep up to 13 people in 7 beds, I think my designs will be more suitable for 2 people who want to be in separate rooms from time to time, as well as for a family of up to 6 people on short vacations who want a small vehicle that
Atardis Motorhome DesignIOW, so far all of this is just noise that has nothing to do with
www.atardis.com
whatever you think you invented. I hope you can understand my
skepticism. You have been, by far, this group's biggest supplier of vaporware.
For me the scariest part is that I now sound like Will Sill.
TB
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 7:22:00 PM UTC-7, Technobarbarian
wrote:
On 6/16/2022 6:52 PM, Catmobile wrote:
IOW, so far all of this is just noise that has nothing to do
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 10:22:29 AM UTC-7,
Technobarbarian wrote:
... IOW you have no idea whether or not this RV will be
stable going down the road. If this idea ever gets past the
dream stage someone will have to sit down and figure this out
for real.
For now I have one last question. Why in the world are you
spending money on this ridiculous idea? I'm wildly assuming
you have something patent-able here? Unless you have a new
design the slides are not and it's unlikely that a novel
arrangement of slides could be patented. Who do you think
will buy this idea? What do you think they would be willing
to pay? And who do you think they would sell those RVs to?
TB
Others have built more top heavy motorhomes so they have
already done a lot of work for me.
SAIC Maxus V90 Villa Edition Protec Q18 (2.3 m - 3.5 m W x 3.35
m H) Beauer Cell-car 3XC (single or double cab) Host Custom
Expedition Camper (3 slideouts) And many other expedition
trucks
My deck cover and the four hinged panels won't weigh that much
because they don't have to support anything other than solar
panels. The deck cover is not meant to be walked on and will
break if somebody tries to walk on it.
But my deck design isn't even a feature I'm trying to patent. I
just included it in my patent application as a free gift for
anybody who wants to use this idea. I can only patent one thing
at a time so if I want to patent two or three different things
it will cost twice or 3 times as much. The retractable rear
enclosure is not patentable because it has been built for other
motorhomes, trailers and truck campers in the same way.
I still haven't shown the feature I want to patent for the
reason stated earlier. The law firm that did the patent search
for me didn't find anything close to it and said that it should
be patentable unless somebody else has come up with a similar
idea just before I filed my patent application last year. It's
just another feature that enables the total length to be
substantially reduced while keeping all of the amenities I
would like to have. It won't cost that much to make and won't
add that much weight to the motorhome.
Even though it can sleep up to 13 people in 7 beds, I think my
designs will be more suitable for 2 people who want to be in
separate rooms from time to time, as well as for a family of up
to 6 people on short vacations who want a small vehicle that is
easy to drive and park.
Atardis Motorhome Design www.atardis.com
with whatever you think you invented. I hope you can understand
my skepticism. You have been, by far, this group's biggest
supplier of vaporware.
For me the scariest part is that I now sound like Will Sill.
TB
Lots of people believe that everything comes full circle in human
behavior... Who knows? BTW, you're not nearly as stuck on
yourself as Will, formerly of Sill Hill, was, nor as nasty in his condescending comments... Because of Catmobile's dream to gaffle
up 13 people for an RV adventure, he seems to be rejecting any
constructive criticism, probably thinking, "They said the Wright
Bros were NUTZ, too!"
I enjoy his perseverance, and feel guilty naysaying his project...
The most disturbing part, is where are the cats of those 13
people? Nobody seems to care about the cats, now days...
HawHawHaw!
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 7:22:00 PM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:things it will cost twice or 3 times as much. The retractable rear enclosure is not patentable because it has been built for other motorhomes, trailers and truck campers in the same way.
On 6/16/2022 6:52 PM, Catmobile wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 10:22:29 AM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote: >>>> ...
IOW you have no idea whether or not this RV will be stable going
down the road. If this idea ever gets past the dream stage someone will >>>> have to sit down and figure this out for real.
For now I have one last question. Why in the world are you spending
money on this ridiculous idea? I'm wildly assuming you have something
patent-able here? Unless you have a new design the slides are not and
it's unlikely that a novel arrangement of slides could be patented. Who >>>> do you think will buy this idea? What do you think they would be willing >>>> to pay? And who do you think they would sell those RVs to?
TB
Others have built more top heavy motorhomes so they have already done a lot of work for me.
SAIC Maxus V90 Villa Edition
Protec Q18 (2.3 m - 3.5 m W x 3.35 m H)
Beauer Cell-car 3XC (single or double cab)
Host Custom Expedition Camper (3 slideouts)
And many other expedition trucks
My deck cover and the four hinged panels won't weigh that much because they don't have to support anything other than solar panels. The deck cover is not meant to be walked on and will break if somebody tries to walk on it.
But my deck design isn't even a feature I'm trying to patent. I just included it in my patent application as a free gift for anybody who wants to use this idea. I can only patent one thing at a time so if I want to patent two or three different
idea just before I filed my patent application last year. It's just another feature that enables the total length to be substantially reduced while keeping all of the amenities I would like to have. It won't cost that much to make and won't add that much
I still haven't shown the feature I want to patent for the reason stated earlier. The law firm that did the patent search for me didn't find anything close to it and said that it should be patentable unless somebody else has come up with a similar
is easy to drive and park.
Even though it can sleep up to 13 people in 7 beds, I think my designs will be more suitable for 2 people who want to be in separate rooms from time to time, as well as for a family of up to 6 people on short vacations who want a small vehicle that
to gaffle up 13 people for an RV adventure, he seems to be rejecting any constructive criticism, probably thinking, "They said the Wright Bros were NUTZ, too!"IOW, so far all of this is just noise that has nothing to do with
Atardis Motorhome Design
www.atardis.com
whatever you think you invented. I hope you can understand my
skepticism. You have been, by far, this group's biggest supplier of
vaporware.
For me the scariest part is that I now sound like Will Sill.
TB
Lots of people believe that everything comes full circle in human behavior... Who knows? BTW, you're not nearly as stuck on yourself as Will, formerly of Sill Hill, was, nor as nasty in his condescending comments... Because of Catmobile's dream
I enjoy his perseverance, and feel guilty naysaying his project... The most disturbing part, is where are the cats of those 13 people? Nobody seems to care about the cats, now days... HawHawHaw!
Ol' Boss Puff
...
IOW, so far all of this is just noise that has nothing to do with
whatever you think you invented. I hope you can understand my
skepticism. You have been, by far, this group's biggest supplier of vaporware.
For me the scariest part is that I now sound like Will Sill.
TB
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 7:22:00 PM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:
...
IOW, so far all of this is just noise that has nothing to do with
whatever you think you invented. I hope you can understand my
skepticism. You have been, by far, this group's biggest supplier of
vaporware.
For me the scariest part is that I now sound like Will Sill.
TB
I don't mind if anybody is skeptical right now because I only have to wait a few more months to show that my designs are real.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
...
Oh, I tend to suspect that you have something. My doubt is that
you have something you can sell and that we'll ever see it produced. You know, like your previous RV designs.
To be fair, my assessment is based more on the history of patents
than Catmobile's history.
"It’s a well-known fact that a vast majority of patents are worthless. Around 97% of all patents never recoup the cost of filing them. That
figure has been floating around for years. There’s other compelling evidence."
...
TB
On Friday, June 17, 2022 at 9:34:31 AM UTC-7, Technobarbarian
wrote:
... Oh, I tend to suspect that you have something. My doubt is
that you have something you can sell and that we'll ever see it
produced. You know, like your previous RV designs.
To be fair, my assessment is based more on the history of
patents than Catmobile's history.
"It’s a well-known fact that a vast majority of patents are
worthless. Around 97% of all patents never recoup the cost of
filing them. That figure has been floating around for years.
There’s other compelling evidence." ... TB
I'm not doing this for money and won't try to recover the cost of
getting my patents. It's like writing a scientific paper and I
actually look at this problem as a mathematical puzzle.
Catmobile :-) www.atardis.com
On Friday, June 17, 2022 at 9:34:31 AM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:
...
Oh, I tend to suspect that you have something. My doubt is that
you have something you can sell and that we'll ever see it produced. You
know, like your previous RV designs.
To be fair, my assessment is based more on the history of patents
than Catmobile's history.
"It’s a well-known fact that a vast majority of patents are worthless.
Around 97% of all patents never recoup the cost of filing them. That
figure has been floating around for years. There’s other compelling
evidence."
...
TB
I'm not doing this for money and won't try to recover the cost of getting my patents.
It's like writing a scientific paper and I actually look at this problem as a mathematical puzzle.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
...
So. What you're saying is you're doing thought engineering? However
comma if you tell me that you literally have a drafting table and
chair, I'll transitorily accept your word, and retract that insinuation.
Note: I don't care if you have some hotshit computer drafting/design program, because then the AI gets the credit for any subsequent
success at the end of the day going forward.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
I'm not doing this for money and won't try to recover the cost of getting my patents.
It's like writing a scientific paper and I actually look at this problem as a mathematical puzzle.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT), Catmobile
<atardism...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not doing this for money and won't try to recover the cost of getting my patents.
It's like writing a scientific paper and I actually look at this problem as a mathematical puzzle.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
Unless you have been able to construct a Tesseract that actually extends
into the fourth dimension the inside will not be larger than the outside dimensions can accommodate.
(Spoiler Alert) I assume that you know that Dr. Who was a fictional
character in a British Sci-Fi TV series and the TARDIS was just a prop.
If you are not doing it for money why the teasers? Why not go straight
to the reveal because I'm pretty sure that RV manufacturers aren't
lurking here to pick up innovative design ideas - and if they are
lurking - the only ideas they will get is that Biden is the worst
President we've had in the last 100 years.
Besides, your "Pat Pending" precludes anyone slipping in front of you.
Filing dates count.
--
Jerry O.
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 1:28:20 PM UTC-7, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT), Catmobile
<atardism...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not doing this for money and won't try to recover the cost of getting my patents.Unless you have been able to construct a Tesseract that actually extends
It's like writing a scientific paper and I actually look at this problem as a mathematical puzzle.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
into the fourth dimension the inside will not be larger than the outside
dimensions can accommodate.
(Spoiler Alert) I assume that you know that Dr. Who was a fictional
character in a British Sci-Fi TV series and the TARDIS was just a prop.
If you are not doing it for money why the teasers? Why not go straight
to the reveal because I'm pretty sure that RV manufacturers aren't
lurking here to pick up innovative design ideas - and if they are
lurking - the only ideas they will get is that Biden is the worst
President we've had in the last 100 years.
Besides, your "Pat Pending" precludes anyone slipping in front of you.
Filing dates count.
--
Jerry O.
I doubt any lurkers look at RORT for political ideas, especially after they'd perused the posts of Georgie, and Honk, unless they were Texas Republican Party stalwarts?
Diamond Joe Jr.
On 6/21/2022 4:19 PM, Don Lampson wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 1:28:20 PM UTC-7, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT), Catmobile
<atardism...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not doing this for money and won't try to recover the cost of getting my patents.Unless you have been able to construct a Tesseract that actually extends >> into the fourth dimension the inside will not be larger than the outside >> dimensions can accommodate.
It's like writing a scientific paper and I actually look at this problem as a mathematical puzzle.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
(Spoiler Alert) I assume that you know that Dr. Who was a fictional
character in a British Sci-Fi TV series and the TARDIS was just a prop. >>
If you are not doing it for money why the teasers? Why not go straight
to the reveal because I'm pretty sure that RV manufacturers aren't
lurking here to pick up innovative design ideas - and if they are
lurking - the only ideas they will get is that Biden is the worst
President we've had in the last 100 years.
Besides, your "Pat Pending" precludes anyone slipping in front of you.
Filing dates count.
Jerry O.
I doubt any lurkers look at RORT for political ideas, especially after they'd perused the posts of Georgie, and Honk, unless they were Texas Republican Party stalwarts?
Diamond Joe Jr.
Right, like they would be interested in your inane, sophomoric posts.
Fido is so judgmental... I can’t tell just by looking at myself
...
Unless you have been able to construct a Tesseract that actually extends
into the fourth dimension the inside will not be larger than the outside dimensions can accommodate.
(Spoiler Alert) I assume that you know that Dr. Who was a fictional
character in a British Sci-Fi TV series and the TARDIS was just a prop.
If you are not doing it for money why the teasers? Why not go straight
to the reveal because I'm pretty sure that RV manufacturers aren't
lurking here to pick up innovative design ideas - and if they are
lurking - the only ideas they will get is that Biden is the worst
President we've had in the last 100 years.
Besides, your "Pat Pending" precludes anyone slipping in front of you.
Filing dates count.
Jerry O.
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 1:28:20 PM UTC-7, Jerry wrote:
...
Unless you have been able to construct a Tesseract that actually extends
into the fourth dimension the inside will not be larger than the outside
dimensions can accommodate.
(Spoiler Alert) I assume that you know that Dr. Who was a fictional
character in a British Sci-Fi TV series and the TARDIS was just a prop.
If you are not doing it for money why the teasers? Why not go straight
to the reveal because I'm pretty sure that RV manufacturers aren't
lurking here to pick up innovative design ideas - and if they are
lurking - the only ideas they will get is that Biden is the worst
President we've had in the last 100 years.
Besides, your "Pat Pending" precludes anyone slipping in front of you.
Filing dates count.
Jerry O.
It's called transdimensional engineering.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvnKXOGYKM8
You're right unless something goes wrong and I cannot file my regular patent application within one year after filing my provisional application. In that case my provisional application will be useless as if it never existed.
After I disclose an idea or design on the web, others will not be able to patent the same thing but they may still be able to patent some variations of it that have not been disclosed.
I have asked one of my brothers to publish all of my designs on the web if I happen to die unexpectedly before filing my regular patent application.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 1:28:20 PM UTC-7, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT), Catmobile
<atardism...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not doing this for money and won't try to recover the cost of getting my patents.Unless you have been able to construct a Tesseract that actually extends
It's like writing a scientific paper and I actually look at this problem as a mathematical puzzle.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
into the fourth dimension the inside will not be larger than the outside
dimensions can accommodate.
(Spoiler Alert) I assume that you know that Dr. Who was a fictional
character in a British Sci-Fi TV series and the TARDIS was just a prop.
If you are not doing it for money why the teasers? Why not go straight
to the reveal because I'm pretty sure that RV manufacturers aren't
lurking here to pick up innovative design ideas - and if they are
lurking - the only ideas they will get is that Biden is the worst
President we've had in the last 100 years.
Besides, your "Pat Pending" precludes anyone slipping in front of you.
Filing dates count.
--
Jerry O.
I doubt any lurkers look at RORT for political ideas, especially after they'd perused the posts of Georgie, and Honk, unless they were Texas Republican Party stalwarts?
Diamond Joe Jr.
...
There is a village somewhere...
Jerry O.
On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 12:22:25 AM UTC-7, Jerry wrote:
...
There is a village somewhere...
Jerry O.
If I wasn't an idiot it wouldn't have taken me 20 years to solve this simple problem.
Catmobile :-)
www.atardis.com
...
The problem has yet to be defined -- and the proposed solution yet to be seen.
Jerry O.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 95:46:59 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,206 |
| Messages: | 5,334,415 |