DATE TIME_ZONE DOWNLOAD UPLOAD LATENCY
02/19/2022 13:25 GMT 240.88 16.18 84
02/19/2022 12:11 GMT 96.06 10.85 85
02/19/2022 12:09 GMT 209.62 11.67 97
02/19/2022 0:12 GMT 79.52 6.61 64
02/18/2022 16:59 GMT 80.38 7.11 61
02/18/2022 14:35 GMT 115.37 12.85 55
02/18/2022 2:19 GMT 92.47 8.21 53
02/17/2022 12:15 GMT 93.55 12.95 63
02/16/2022 12:25 GMT 34.52 12.49 70
02/16/2022 1:54 GMT 56.72 7.19 54
02/15/2022 22:33 GMT 126.4 11.76 51
02/15/2022 19:21 GMT 72.73 8.96 71
02/15/2022 16:12 GMT 38.09 10.85 63
02/15/2022 14:49 GMT 130.65 9.6 77
02/15/2022 13:54 GMT 215.19 13.06 63
02/15/2022 13:45 GMT 65 3.15 95
02/15/2022 13:39 GMT 189.17 10.47 87
02/15/2022 13:15 GMT 171.11 10.93 87
02/15/2022 12:57 GMT 25.72 7.25 62
02/15/2022 12:44 GMT 101.7 14.22 87
DATE TIME_ZONE DOWNLOAD UPLOAD LATENCY
02/19/2022 13:25 GMT 240.88 16.18 84
02/19/2022 12:11 GMT 96.06 10.85 85
02/19/2022 12:09 GMT 209.62 11.67 97
02/19/2022 0:12 GMT 79.52 6.61 64
02/18/2022 16:59 GMT 80.38 7.11 61
02/18/2022 14:35 GMT 115.37 12.85 55
02/18/2022 2:19 GMT 92.47 8.21 53
02/17/2022 12:15 GMT 93.55 12.95 63
02/16/2022 12:25 GMT 34.52 12.49 70
02/16/2022 1:54 GMT 56.72 7.19 54
02/15/2022 22:33 GMT 126.4 11.76 51
02/15/2022 19:21 GMT 72.73 8.96 71
02/15/2022 16:12 GMT 38.09 10.85 63
02/15/2022 14:49 GMT 130.65 9.6 77
02/15/2022 13:54 GMT 215.19 13.06 63
02/15/2022 13:45 GMT 65 3.15 95
02/15/2022 13:39 GMT 189.17 10.47 87
02/15/2022 13:15 GMT 171.11 10.93 87
02/15/2022 12:57 GMT 25.72 7.25 62
02/15/2022 12:44 GMT 101.7 14.22 87
On 2/19/2022 12:41 PM, bfh wrote:
DATEÂ Â Â TIME_ZONEÂ Â Â DOWNLOADÂ Â Â UPLOAD LATENCY >> 02/19/2022 13:25Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 240.88Â Â Â 16.18Â Â Â 84
02/19/2022 12:11Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 96.06Â Â Â 10.85Â Â Â 85
02/19/2022 12:09Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 209.62Â Â Â 11.67Â Â Â 97
02/19/2022 0:12Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 79.52Â Â Â 6.61Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 64
02/18/2022 16:59Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 80.38Â Â Â 7.11Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 61
02/18/2022 14:35Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 115.37Â Â Â 12.85Â Â Â 55
02/18/2022 2:19Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 92.47Â Â Â 8.21Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 53
02/17/2022 12:15Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 93.55Â Â Â 12.95Â Â Â 63
02/16/2022 12:25Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 34.52Â Â Â 12.49Â Â Â 70
02/16/2022 1:54Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 56.72Â Â Â 7.19Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 54
02/15/2022 22:33Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 126.4Â Â Â 11.76Â Â Â 51
02/15/2022 19:21Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 72.73Â Â Â 8.96Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 71
02/15/2022 16:12Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 38.09Â Â Â 10.85Â Â Â 63
02/15/2022 14:49Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 130.65Â Â Â 9.6Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 77
02/15/2022 13:54Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 215.19Â Â Â 13.06Â Â Â 63
02/15/2022 13:45Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 65Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.15Â Â Â 95
02/15/2022 13:39Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 189.17Â Â Â 10.47Â Â Â 87
02/15/2022 13:15Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 171.11Â Â Â 10.93Â Â Â 87
02/15/2022 12:57Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 25.72Â Â Â 7.25Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 62
02/15/2022 12:44Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 101.7Â Â Â 14.22Â Â Â 87
That seems awfully inconsistent. Are the Russians jamming those
satellites in preparation for a siege on Ukraine?
On 2/19/2022 10:41 AM, bfh wrote:
DATEÂ Â Â TIME_ZONEÂ Â Â DOWNLOADÂ Â Â UPLOAD LATENCY >> 02/19/2022 13:25Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 240.88Â Â Â 16.18Â Â Â 84
02/19/2022 12:11Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 96.06Â Â Â 10.85Â Â Â 85
02/19/2022 12:09Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 209.62Â Â Â 11.67Â Â Â 97
02/19/2022 0:12Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 79.52Â Â Â 6.61Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 64
02/18/2022 16:59Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 80.38Â Â Â 7.11Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 61
02/18/2022 14:35Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 115.37Â Â Â 12.85Â Â Â 55
02/18/2022 2:19Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 92.47Â Â Â 8.21Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 53
02/17/2022 12:15Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 93.55Â Â Â 12.95Â Â Â 63
02/16/2022 12:25Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 34.52Â Â Â 12.49Â Â Â 70
02/16/2022 1:54Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 56.72Â Â Â 7.19Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 54
02/15/2022 22:33Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 126.4Â Â Â 11.76Â Â Â 51
02/15/2022 19:21Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 72.73Â Â Â 8.96Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 71
02/15/2022 16:12Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 38.09Â Â Â 10.85Â Â Â 63
02/15/2022 14:49Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 130.65Â Â Â 9.6Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 77
02/15/2022 13:54Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 215.19Â Â Â 13.06Â Â Â 63
02/15/2022 13:45Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 65Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.15Â Â Â 95
02/15/2022 13:39Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 189.17Â Â Â 10.47Â Â Â 87
02/15/2022 13:15Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 171.11Â Â Â 10.93Â Â Â 87
02/15/2022 12:57Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 25.72Â Â Â 7.25Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 62
02/15/2022 12:44Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 101.7Â Â Â 14.22Â Â Â 87
You lucky bastard. I would never rub it in, if'n it were me...
kmiller wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:41 AM, bfh wrote:
DATEÂ Â Â TIME_ZONEÂ Â Â DOWNLOADÂ Â Â UPLOAD LATENCY >>> 02/19/2022 13:25Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 240.88Â Â Â 16.18Â Â Â 84
02/19/2022 12:11Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 96.06Â Â Â 10.85Â Â Â 85
02/19/2022 12:09Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 209.62Â Â Â 11.67Â Â Â 97
02/19/2022 0:12Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 79.52Â Â Â 6.61Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 64
02/18/2022 16:59Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 80.38Â Â Â 7.11Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 61
02/18/2022 14:35Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 115.37Â Â Â 12.85Â Â Â 55
02/18/2022 2:19Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 92.47Â Â Â 8.21Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 53
02/17/2022 12:15Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 93.55Â Â Â 12.95Â Â Â 63
02/16/2022 12:25Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 34.52Â Â Â 12.49Â Â Â 70
02/16/2022 1:54Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 56.72Â Â Â 7.19Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 54
02/15/2022 22:33Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 126.4Â Â Â 11.76Â Â Â 51
02/15/2022 19:21Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 72.73Â Â Â 8.96Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 71
02/15/2022 16:12Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 38.09Â Â Â 10.85Â Â Â 63
02/15/2022 14:49Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 130.65Â Â Â 9.6Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 77
02/15/2022 13:54Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 215.19Â Â Â 13.06Â Â Â 63
02/15/2022 13:45Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 65Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 3.15Â Â Â 95
02/15/2022 13:39Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 189.17Â Â Â 10.47Â Â Â 87
02/15/2022 13:15Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 171.11Â Â Â 10.93Â Â Â 87
02/15/2022 12:57Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 25.72Â Â Â 7.25Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 62
02/15/2022 12:44Â Â Â GMTÂ Â Â 101.7Â Â Â 14.22Â Â Â 87
You lucky bastard. I would never rub it in, if'n it were me...
Of course you wouldn't, but I still don't understand why you're behind me. https://sebsebmc.github.io/starlink-coverage/index.html
When is your estimated get-your-stuff date?
On 2/19/2022 8:47 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:41 AM, bfh wrote:
DATE   TIME_ZONE   DOWNLOAD   UPLOAD
LATENCY
02/19/2022 13:25   GMT   240.88  ÂÂ
16.18   84
02/19/2022 12:11   GMT   96.06  ÂÂ
10.85   85
02/19/2022 12:09   GMT   209.62  ÂÂ
11.67   97
02/19/2022 0:12   GMT   79.52  ÂÂ
6.61       64 >>>> 02/18/2022 16:59   GMT   80.38  ÂÂ
7.11       61 >>>> 02/18/2022 14:35   GMT   115.37  ÂÂ
12.85   55
02/18/2022 2:19   GMT   92.47  ÂÂ
8.21       53 >>>> 02/17/2022 12:15   GMT   93.55  ÂÂ
12.95   63
02/16/2022 12:25   GMT   34.52  ÂÂ
12.49   70
02/16/2022 1:54   GMT   56.72  ÂÂ
7.19       54 >>>> 02/15/2022 22:33   GMT   126.4  ÂÂ
11.76   51
02/15/2022 19:21   GMT   72.73  ÂÂ
8.96       71 >>>> 02/15/2022 16:12   GMT   38.09  ÂÂ
10.85   63
02/15/2022 14:49   GMT   130.65  ÂÂ
9.6       77
02/15/2022 13:54   GMT   215.19  ÂÂ
13.06   63
02/15/2022 13:45   GMT   >>>> 65        3.15   95
02/15/2022 13:39   GMT   189.17  ÂÂ
10.47   87
02/15/2022 13:15   GMT   171.11  ÂÂ
10.93   87
02/15/2022 12:57   GMT   25.72  ÂÂ
7.25       62 >>>> 02/15/2022 12:44   GMT   101.7  ÂÂ
14.22   87
You lucky bastard. I would never rub it in, if'n it were me...
Of course you wouldn't, but I still don't understand why you're
behind me.
https://sebsebmc.github.io/starlink-coverage/index.html
When is your estimated get-your-stuff date?
"Starlink expects to expand service in your area by mid 2022."
A few months ago it was "late 2021".
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
On 4/18/22 01:30, bfh wrote:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Being satellite, I can understand the variations in speeds and
latency. What I don't get is the changes i IP addresses. 6 years here
and the onlytime my IP changes is when I change the router. Otherwise,
the IP remains the same for years. Even through reboots and power
losses. The same IP is always reassigned.
But, what's really important is how you perceive your service. Is it
mostly satisfactory or not? Is it better than the fractional DSL and satellite service you had before?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
On 4/17/2022 10:30 PM, bfh wrote:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Interesting. Thanks. I also read your response to Tabor. The latency
is not bad at all. Some of it could be attributed to your end point
equipment but probably not all.
my DSL and I'd grab it in a heartbeat.
Have you had many outages?
Any that lasted longer than a minute or so?
Have to tried streaming a movie or such?
Are you using the newer square dishy or the round one?
kmiller wrote:
On 4/17/2022 10:30 PM, bfh wrote:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Interesting. Thanks. I also read your response to Tabor. The latency
is not bad at all. Some of it could be attributed to your end point
equipment but probably not all.
Well, as near as I can tell, the signal has to go from me to the sat to
the ground station to the internet, then back to the ground station to
the sat to me.
In any event, it's waaaay better than
my DSL and I'd grab it in a heartbeat.
Have you had many outages?
According to the starlink app, I've had 2 minutes worth in the last 12
hours. I haven't noticed any of them, and I attribute most of them to
the roof rhino.
Any that lasted longer than a minute or so?
No.
Have to tried streaming a movie or such?
I stream movies and TV programs about 2-3 hours a night, and have had no problems. I used to get the rotating arrow frequently with DSL.
Are you using the newer square dishy or the round one?
I have the square one - but it's rectangular. Must have gotten too near
a black hole during shipment.
I'm as happy as a fox in a chicken coop. Or a possum in a dead cow. Coon
in a fig tree. Squirrel in RORT.
On 4/18/2022 1:47 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 4/17/2022 10:30 PM, bfh wrote:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Interesting. Thanks. I also read your response to Tabor. The
latency is not bad at all. Some of it could be attributed to your
end point equipment but probably not all.
Well, as near as I can tell, the signal has to go from me to the sat
to the ground station to the internet, then back to the ground
station to the sat to me.
 In any event, it's waaaay better than
my DSL and I'd grab it in a heartbeat.
Have you had many outages?
According to the starlink app, I've had 2 minutes worth in the last
12 hours. I haven't noticed any of them, and I attribute most of
them to the roof rhino.
Any that lasted longer than a minute or so?
No.
Have to tried streaming a movie or such?
I stream movies and TV programs about 2-3 hours a night, and have
had no problems. I used to get the rotating arrow frequently with DSL.
Are you using the newer square dishy or the round one?
I have the square one - but it's rectangular. Must have gotten too
near a black hole during shipment.
I'm as happy as a fox in a chicken coop. Or a possum in a dead cow.
Coon in a fig tree. Squirrel in RORT.
You lucky bastard.
kmiller wrote:
On 4/18/2022 1:47 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 4/17/2022 10:30 PM, bfh wrote:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Interesting. Thanks. I also read your response to Tabor. The latency
is not bad at all. Some of it could be attributed to your end point
equipment but probably not all.
Well, as near as I can tell, the signal has to go from me to the sat
to the ground station to the internet, then back to the ground
station to the sat to me.
 In any event, it's waaaay better than
my DSL and I'd grab it in a heartbeat.
Have you had many outages?
According to the starlink app, I've had 2 minutes worth in the last
12 hours. I haven't noticed any of them, and I attribute most of them
to the roof rhino.
Any that lasted longer than a minute or so?
No.
Have to tried streaming a movie or such?
I stream movies and TV programs about 2-3 hours a night, and have had
no problems. I used to get the rotating arrow frequently with DSL.
Are you using the newer square dishy or the round one?
I have the square one - but it's rectangular. Must have gotten too
near a black hole during shipment.
I'm as happy as a fox in a chicken coop. Or a possum in a dead cow.
Coon in a fig tree. Squirrel in RORT.
You lucky bastard.
If you're going to keep insisting that I'm lucky, I'm going to have to
insist that I'm not a bastard. For me to be both would literally be inequitable and unfair to people who are only one or the other.
On 4/18/2022 8:09 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 4/18/2022 1:47 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 4/17/2022 10:30 PM, bfh wrote:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Interesting. Thanks. I also read your response to Tabor. The
latency is not bad at all. Some of it could be attributed to your
end point equipment but probably not all.
Well, as near as I can tell, the signal has to go from me to the
sat to the ground station to the internet, then back to the ground
station to the sat to me.
 Â In any event, it's waaaay better than
my DSL and I'd grab it in a heartbeat.
Have you had many outages?
According to the starlink app, I've had 2 minutes worth in the
last 12 hours. I haven't noticed any of them, and I attribute most
of them to the roof rhino.
Any that lasted longer than a minute or so?
No.
Have to tried streaming a movie or such?
I stream movies and TV programs about 2-3 hours a night, and have
had no problems. I used to get the rotating arrow frequently with
DSL.
Are you using the newer square dishy or the round one?
I have the square one - but it's rectangular. Must have gotten too
near a black hole during shipment.
I'm as happy as a fox in a chicken coop. Or a possum in a dead
cow. Coon in a fig tree. Squirrel in RORT.
You lucky bastard.
If you're going to keep insisting that I'm lucky, I'm going to have
to insist that I'm not a bastard. For me to be both would literally
be inequitable and unfair to people who are only one or the other.
Removing the option for them to achieve bothness (as you have) would
be even more unfairish.
kmiller wrote:
On 4/18/2022 8:09 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 4/18/2022 1:47 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 4/17/2022 10:30 PM, bfh wrote:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Interesting. Thanks. I also read your response to Tabor. The
latency is not bad at all. Some of it could be attributed to your
end point equipment but probably not all.
Well, as near as I can tell, the signal has to go from me to the
sat to the ground station to the internet, then back to the ground
station to the sat to me.
 Â In any event, it's waaaay better than
my DSL and I'd grab it in a heartbeat.
Have you had many outages?
According to the starlink app, I've had 2 minutes worth in the last
12 hours. I haven't noticed any of them, and I attribute most of
them to the roof rhino.
Any that lasted longer than a minute or so?
No.
Have to tried streaming a movie or such?
I stream movies and TV programs about 2-3 hours a night, and have
had no problems. I used to get the rotating arrow frequently with DSL. >>>>>
Are you using the newer square dishy or the round one?
I have the square one - but it's rectangular. Must have gotten too
near a black hole during shipment.
I'm as happy as a fox in a chicken coop. Or a possum in a dead cow.
Coon in a fig tree. Squirrel in RORT.
You lucky bastard.
If you're going to keep insisting that I'm lucky, I'm going to have
to insist that I'm not a bastard. For me to be both would literally
be inequitable and unfair to people who are only one or the other.
Removing the option for them to achieve bothness (as you have) would
be even more unfairish.
At the end of the day going forward, I disagree. Their having the
option, but failing to achieve it will literally do irreparable damage
to their self-esteem. I allege that adjusting the calculus and metrics
of the messaging to significantly downplay the actuality and
desirability of bothness would be more compassionate. It's The Right
Thing To Do. Particularly in this time when the significance of the
passage of time is significant.
58/193/15 @ 12:31 PM
On 4/20/2022 9:37 AM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 4/18/2022 8:09 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 4/18/2022 1:47 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 4/17/2022 10:30 PM, bfh wrote:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1URGihhgbhqQ66PE1nskKUhwZTvibBDZV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Interesting. Thanks. I also read your response to Tabor. The
latency is not bad at all. Some of it could be attributed to
your end point equipment but probably not all.
Well, as near as I can tell, the signal has to go from me to the
sat to the ground station to the internet, then back to the
ground station to the sat to me.
 Â In any event, it's waaaay better than >>>>>>> my DSL and I'd grab it in a heartbeat.
Have you had many outages?
According to the starlink app, I've had 2 minutes worth in the
last 12 hours. I haven't noticed any of them, and I attribute
most of them to the roof rhino.
Any that lasted longer than a minute or so?
No.
Have to tried streaming a movie or such?
I stream movies and TV programs about 2-3 hours a night, and
have had no problems. I used to get the rotating arrow
frequently with DSL.
Are you using the newer square dishy or the round one?
I have the square one - but it's rectangular. Must have gotten
too near a black hole during shipment.
I'm as happy as a fox in a chicken coop. Or a possum in a dead
cow. Coon in a fig tree. Squirrel in RORT.
You lucky bastard.
If you're going to keep insisting that I'm lucky, I'm going to
have to insist that I'm not a bastard. For me to be both would
literally be inequitable and unfair to people who are only one or
the other.
Removing the option for them to achieve bothness (as you have)
would be even more unfairish.
At the end of the day going forward, I disagree. Their having the
option, but failing to achieve it will literally do irreparable
damage to their self-esteem. I allege that adjusting the calculus
and metrics of the messaging to significantly downplay the actuality
and desirability of bothness would be more compassionate. It's The
Right Thing To Do. Particularly in this time when the significance
of the passage of time is significant.
58/193/15 @ 12:31 PM
You would abort their option to succeed even after their little hearts
have started beating bothishly. How cruel. Next, you'll want to remove
their options to learn to add bastard to lucky because you think the
count was achieved by reference to some critical race theory which you
won't even enter. Damn. That's stooping lower than a dead possum under
a fig tree.
Bothism now, Bothism tomorrow, and Bothism forever!
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any relationship is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered that I'm technically disadvantaged for that project.
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any relationship is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered that I'm technically disadvantaged for that project.
On 7/26/2022 11:32 AM, bfh wrote:
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any
relationship is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered that
I'm technically disadvantaged for that project.
Hey, bfh! Check it out. I can't really see any correlation to time,
but maybe I'm missing something...
http://www.zippodrones.com/uploads/files/download-speed-over-time.xlsx
kmiller wrote:
On 7/26/2022 11:32 AM, bfh wrote:
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any relationship
is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered that I'm technically
disadvantaged for that project.
Hey, bfh! Check it out. I can't really see any correlation to time,
but maybe I'm missing something...
http://www.zippodrones.com/uploads/files/download-speed-over-time.xlsx
Hey, thanks. If I sort on time and change the chart to a line chart -
and sort of blur my brain - it looks like it's mostly faster between
about 1:30AM and about 6AM.
However, if I do an average starting at 1:30, it stays around 120 until
about 8AM, when it starts decreasing. If I move down the column
selecting 4-5 hours worth of cells, I can't find an average near 120
anywhere else.
I would like to conclude that 1:30 to 8 AM is the fastest time, but
those sorted times could be on any date between 2/15 and now, and I have
no idea what that is doing to the averages.
However comma again, I do know that if I sort on date and do an average
every 30 days from 2/15 until now, the average steadily falls. My first
30 days had an avg of 101, and my last 30 is 67.
I'm more than ready for an inflection point to arrive.....but but
but....even 20-30 Mbps has proven to be more than efficacious for web
surfing and video streaming. I don't think I'm likely to pivot into
literal squint-faced annoyance until I have to download a large file on
a slow day.
Thanks again for your help.
Download Mbps
57.93
Upload Mbps
7.75
Ping ms 71
On 7/27/2022 10:12 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 7/26/2022 11:32 AM, bfh wrote:
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any
relationship is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered that
I'm technically disadvantaged for that project.
Hey, bfh! Check it out. I can't really see any correlation to time,
but maybe I'm missing something...
http://www.zippodrones.com/uploads/files/download-speed-over-time.xlsx
Hey, thanks. If I sort on time and change the chart to a line chart
- and sort of blur my brain - it looks like it's mostly faster
between about 1:30AM and about 6AM.
However, if I do an average starting at 1:30, it stays around 120
until about 8AM, when it starts decreasing. If I move down the
column selecting 4-5 hours worth of cells, I can't find an average
near 120 anywhere else.
I would like to conclude that 1:30 to 8 AM is the fastest time, but
those sorted times could be on any date between 2/15 and now, and I
have no idea what that is doing to the averages.
However comma again, I do know that if I sort on date and do an
average every 30 days from 2/15 until now, the average steadily
falls. My first 30 days had an avg of 101, and my last 30 is 67.
I'm more than ready for an inflection point to arrive.....but but
but....even 20-30 Mbps has proven to be more than efficacious for
web surfing and video streaming. I don't think I'm likely to pivot
into literal squint-faced annoyance until I have to download a large
file on a slow day.
Thanks again for your help.
 Download Mbps
57.93
Upload Mbps
7.75
Ping ms 71
It looked like a bad wire brush when I sorted by time. I couldn't
glean any rhyme or reason from it. I think you should cut down those
trees and re-evaluate.
kmiller wrote:
On 7/27/2022 10:12 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 7/26/2022 11:32 AM, bfh wrote:
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any
relationship is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered that
I'm technically disadvantaged for that project.
Hey, bfh! Check it out. I can't really see any correlation to
time, but maybe I'm missing something...
http://www.zippodrones.com/uploads/files/download-speed-over-time.xlsx >>>>
Hey, thanks. If I sort on time and change the chart to a line chart
- and sort of blur my brain - it looks like it's mostly faster
between about 1:30AM and about 6AM.
However, if I do an average starting at 1:30, it stays around 120
until about 8AM, when it starts decreasing. If I move down the
column selecting 4-5 hours worth of cells, I can't find an average
near 120 anywhere else.
I would like to conclude that 1:30 to 8 AM is the fastest time, but
those sorted times could be on any date between 2/15 and now, and I
have no idea what that is doing to the averages.
However comma again, I do know that if I sort on date and do an
average every 30 days from 2/15 until now, the average steadily
falls. My first 30 days had an avg of 101, and my last 30 is 67.
I'm more than ready for an inflection point to arrive.....but but
but....even 20-30 Mbps has proven to be more than efficacious for
web surfing and video streaming. I don't think I'm likely to pivot
into literal squint-faced annoyance until I have to download a
large file on a slow day.
Thanks again for your help.
 Â Download Mbps
57.93
Upload Mbps
7.75
Ping ms 71
It looked like a bad wire brush when I sorted by time. I couldn't
glean any rhyme or reason from it. I think you should cut down those
trees and re-evaluate.
With 3-6 sats allegedly up there whenever I check, I can't convince
myself that the trees are a big problem. For example, right now
Starlink tells me that in the last 12 hours I've been obstructed for 1
minute 18 seconds, no signal for 2 secs, and network issue for 14 secs.
Also right now, that other site - which "is NOT affiliated with
Starlink or SpaceX" - claims that there 5 available sats in view, and
3 of them are east of north where there are no trees.
And I can't cut down any more trees. If I did, some transitorily
disoriented PNW tourist with a malfunctioning GPS would drive by and
report me under the Greenie Flag laws, and before I knew it, people
wearing birkenstocks, cargo shorts, and Earth Day T-shirts would show
up in a camo EV to psychoanalyze me and confiscate my chainsaws.
bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:Here's a little more:
On 7/27/2022 10:12 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 7/26/2022 11:32 AM, bfh wrote:Hey, thanks. If I sort on time and change the chart to a line chart
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any
relationship is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered that
I'm technically disadvantaged for that project.
Hey, bfh! Check it out. I can't really see any correlation to time,
but maybe I'm missing something...
http://www.zippodrones.com/uploads/files/download-speed-over-time.xlsx >>>>
- and sort of blur my brain - it looks like it's mostly faster
between about 1:30AM and about 6AM.
However, if I do an average starting at 1:30, it stays around 120
until about 8AM, when it starts decreasing. If I move down the
column selecting 4-5 hours worth of cells, I can't find an average
near 120 anywhere else.
I would like to conclude that 1:30 to 8 AM is the fastest time, but
those sorted times could be on any date between 2/15 and now, and I
have no idea what that is doing to the averages.
However comma again, I do know that if I sort on date and do an
average every 30 days from 2/15 until now, the average steadily
falls. My first 30 days had an avg of 101, and my last 30 is 67.
I'm more than ready for an inflection point to arrive.....but but
but....even 20-30 Mbps has proven to be more than efficacious for
web surfing and video streaming. I don't think I'm likely to pivot
into literal squint-faced annoyance until I have to download a large
file on a slow day.
Thanks again for your help.
 Â Download Mbps
57.93
Upload Mbps
7.75
Ping ms 71
It looked like a bad wire brush when I sorted by time. I couldn't
glean any rhyme or reason from it. I think you should cut down those
trees and re-evaluate.
With 3-6 sats allegedly up there whenever I check, I can't convince
myself that the trees are a big problem. For example, right now
Starlink tells me that in the last 12 hours I've been obstructed for 1
minute 18 seconds, no signal for 2 secs, and network issue for 14 secs.
Also right now, that other site - which "is NOT affiliated with
Starlink or SpaceX" - claims that there 5 available sats in view, and
3 of them are east of north where there are no trees.
And I can't cut down any more trees. If I did, some transitorily
disoriented PNW tourist with a malfunctioning GPS would drive by and
report me under the Greenie Flag laws, and before I knew it, people
wearing birkenstocks, cargo shorts, and Earth Day T-shirts would show
up in a camo EV to psychoanalyze me and confiscate my chainsaws.
Avg down speed
12AM - 6AM 107
6AM -12PM 105
12PM - 6PM 90
6PM - 12AM 58
kmiller wrote:
On 7/28/2022 10:25 AM, bfh wrote:
bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:Here's a little more:
On 7/27/2022 10:12 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 7/26/2022 11:32 AM, bfh wrote:
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any
relationship is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered
that I'm technically disadvantaged for that project.
Hey, bfh! Check it out. I can't really see any correlation to
time, but maybe I'm missing something...
http://www.zippodrones.com/uploads/files/download-speed-over-time.xlsx >>>>>>>
Hey, thanks. If I sort on time and change the chart to a line
chart - and sort of blur my brain - it looks like it's mostly
faster between about 1:30AM and about 6AM.
However, if I do an average starting at 1:30, it stays around 120
until about 8AM, when it starts decreasing. If I move down the
column selecting 4-5 hours worth of cells, I can't find an average >>>>>> near 120 anywhere else.
I would like to conclude that 1:30 to 8 AM is the fastest time,
but those sorted times could be on any date between 2/15 and now,
and I have no idea what that is doing to the averages.
However comma again, I do know that if I sort on date and do an
average every 30 days from 2/15 until now, the average steadily
falls. My first 30 days had an avg of 101, and my last 30 is 67.
I'm more than ready for an inflection point to arrive.....but but
but....even 20-30 Mbps has proven to be more than efficacious for
web surfing and video streaming. I don't think I'm likely to pivot >>>>>> into literal squint-faced annoyance until I have to download a
large file on a slow day.
Thanks again for your help.
 Â Download Mbps
57.93
Upload Mbps
7.75
Ping ms 71
It looked like a bad wire brush when I sorted by time. I couldn't
glean any rhyme or reason from it. I think you should cut down
those trees and re-evaluate.
With 3-6 sats allegedly up there whenever I check, I can't convince
myself that the trees are a big problem. For example, right now
Starlink tells me that in the last 12 hours I've been obstructed for
1 minute 18 seconds, no signal for 2 secs, and network issue for 14
secs.
Also right now, that other site - which "is NOT affiliated with
Starlink or SpaceX" - claims that there 5 available sats in view,
and 3 of them are east of north where there are no trees.
And I can't cut down any more trees. If I did, some transitorily
disoriented PNW tourist with a malfunctioning GPS would drive by and
report me under the Greenie Flag laws, and before I knew it, people
wearing birkenstocks, cargo shorts, and Earth Day T-shirts would
show up in a camo EV to psychoanalyze me and confiscate my chainsaws.
Avg down speed
12AM - 6AM 107
6AM -12PM 105
12PM - 6PM 90
6PM - 12AM 58
That tells me that it's fastest when you use it the most - you night
owl, you. Also, is there any streaming going on elsewhere in the
household during the times of measurement? Particularly, during times
of lower speeds?
The wife is on at random times, but she rarely streams anything, and I literally doubt that she had any statistically significant effect on the Ookla tests. If I had a top-tier press secretary like Brandon has, I'd
get her to explain to you why I think that.
Is that manually sampled data?
Yes, it's almost entirely manual (but with a little calculus involved)
and I'm glad you asked. Inspired by Catmobile, I cobbled up a little
turbine that can be slid in and out of an ethernet cable - or even a
Starlink proprietary cable - and is spun by the flow of megabits through
it. Once it's spinning from downloading something spinful, I use a
Briggs & Stratton Treysit Sirometer to measure the RPM of the turbine
which can readily be converted to Mbps with the use of my secret and as-yet-unpatented algorithm. I know it's accurate, because I calibrated
the sirometer with my nearly always consistent 2.7 Mbps DSL connection
while streaming a video about the Treysit.
Note: In case you're wondering after refamiliarizing yourself with
Treysit operation, I put a tiny drop of JB Weld on one of the turbine
blades - without which the Treysit would have just sat there doing
literally nearly nothing.
.......ummmm......crap. I just had an inconveniently timed attack of transparency which forces me to unwillingly tell you the unvarnished and unhyperbolized truth. So...........I got the data from my Ookla speed
tests which you so considerately put into spreadsheet time and speed
columns for me. I used those columns to get average speeds for selected
time spans.
However comma in my defense, I did in fact manually operate the mouse to
get the Ookla tests started and to select the sections of the speed
column that LibreOffice used to calculate averages.
On 7/28/2022 10:25 AM, bfh wrote:
bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:Here's a little more:
On 7/27/2022 10:12 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 7/26/2022 11:32 AM, bfh wrote:
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any
relationship is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered
that I'm technically disadvantaged for that project.
Hey, bfh! Check it out. I can't really see any correlation to
time, but maybe I'm missing something...
http://www.zippodrones.com/uploads/files/download-speed-over-time.xlsx >>>>>>
Hey, thanks. If I sort on time and change the chart to a line
chart - and sort of blur my brain - it looks like it's mostly
faster between about 1:30AM and about 6AM.
However, if I do an average starting at 1:30, it stays around 120
until about 8AM, when it starts decreasing. If I move down the
column selecting 4-5 hours worth of cells, I can't find an
average near 120 anywhere else.
I would like to conclude that 1:30 to 8 AM is the fastest time,
but those sorted times could be on any date between 2/15 and now,
and I have no idea what that is doing to the averages.
However comma again, I do know that if I sort on date and do an
average every 30 days from 2/15 until now, the average steadily
falls. My first 30 days had an avg of 101, and my last 30 is 67.
I'm more than ready for an inflection point to arrive.....but but
but....even 20-30 Mbps has proven to be more than efficacious for
web surfing and video streaming. I don't think I'm likely to
pivot into literal squint-faced annoyance until I have to
download a large file on a slow day.
Thanks again for your help.
 Â Download Mbps
57.93
Upload Mbps
7.75
Ping ms 71
It looked like a bad wire brush when I sorted by time. I couldn't
glean any rhyme or reason from it. I think you should cut down
those trees and re-evaluate.
With 3-6 sats allegedly up there whenever I check, I can't convince
myself that the trees are a big problem. For example, right now
Starlink tells me that in the last 12 hours I've been obstructed
for 1 minute 18 seconds, no signal for 2 secs, and network issue
for 14 secs.
Also right now, that other site - which "is NOT affiliated with
Starlink or SpaceX" - claims that there 5 available sats in view,
and 3 of them are east of north where there are no trees.
And I can't cut down any more trees. If I did, some transitorily
disoriented PNW tourist with a malfunctioning GPS would drive by
and report me under the Greenie Flag laws, and before I knew it,
people wearing birkenstocks, cargo shorts, and Earth Day T-shirts
would show up in a camo EV to psychoanalyze me and confiscate my
chainsaws.
Avg down speed
12AM - 6AM 107
6AM -12PM 105
12PM - 6PM 90
6PM - 12AM 58
That tells me that it's fastest when you use it the most - you night
owl, you. Also, is there any streaming going on elsewhere in the
household during the times of measurement? Particularly, during times
of lower speeds?
Is that manually sampled data?
On 7/28/2022 6:17 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 7/28/2022 10:25 AM, bfh wrote:
bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:Here's a little more:
On 7/27/2022 10:12 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 7/26/2022 11:32 AM, bfh wrote:
Want something efficacious to do?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qtpUHMf5Vay5K5iVZMVGdclZapofho9t/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105875262482197039209&rtpof=true&sd=true
Take the time of day and download speeds, and see if any
relationship is revealed. I'd do it myself, but I discovered >>>>>>>>> that I'm technically disadvantaged for that project.
Hey, bfh! Check it out. I can't really see any correlation to >>>>>>>> time, but maybe I'm missing something...
http://www.zippodrones.com/uploads/files/download-speed-over-time.xlsx
Hey, thanks. If I sort on time and change the chart to a line
chart - and sort of blur my brain - it looks like it's mostly
faster between about 1:30AM and about 6AM.
However, if I do an average starting at 1:30, it stays around
120 until about 8AM, when it starts decreasing. If I move down
the column selecting 4-5 hours worth of cells, I can't find an
average near 120 anywhere else.
I would like to conclude that 1:30 to 8 AM is the fastest time, >>>>>>> but those sorted times could be on any date between 2/15 and
now, and I have no idea what that is doing to the averages.
However comma again, I do know that if I sort on date and do an >>>>>>> average every 30 days from 2/15 until now, the average steadily >>>>>>> falls. My first 30 days had an avg of 101, and my last 30 is 67. >>>>>>>
I'm more than ready for an inflection point to arrive.....but
but but....even 20-30 Mbps has proven to be more than
efficacious for web surfing and video streaming. I don't think
I'm likely to pivot into literal squint-faced annoyance until I >>>>>>> have to download a large file on a slow day.
Thanks again for your help.
 Â Download Mbps
57.93
Upload Mbps
7.75
Ping ms 71
It looked like a bad wire brush when I sorted by time. I
couldn't glean any rhyme or reason from it. I think you should
cut down those trees and re-evaluate.
With 3-6 sats allegedly up there whenever I check, I can't
convince myself that the trees are a big problem. For example,
right now Starlink tells me that in the last 12 hours I've been
obstructed for 1 minute 18 seconds, no signal for 2 secs, and
network issue for 14 secs.
Also right now, that other site - which "is NOT affiliated with
Starlink or SpaceX" - claims that there 5 available sats in view,
and 3 of them are east of north where there are no trees.
And I can't cut down any more trees. If I did, some transitorily
disoriented PNW tourist with a malfunctioning GPS would drive by
and report me under the Greenie Flag laws, and before I knew it,
people wearing birkenstocks, cargo shorts, and Earth Day T-shirts
would show up in a camo EV to psychoanalyze me and confiscate my
chainsaws.
Avg down speed
12AM - 6AM 107
6AM -12PM 105
12PM - 6PM 90
6PM - 12AM 58
That tells me that it's fastest when you use it the most - you
night owl, you. Also, is there any streaming going on elsewhere in
the household during the times of measurement? Particularly, during
times of lower speeds?
The wife is on at random times, but she rarely streams anything, and
I literally doubt that she had any statistically significant effect
on the Ookla tests. If I had a top-tier press secretary like Brandon
has, I'd get her to explain to you why I think that.
I'd certainly believe her. It's not like she'd claim the election was stolen, or anything like that...
Is that manually sampled data?
Yes, it's almost entirely manual (but with a little calculus
involved) and I'm glad you asked. Inspired by Catmobile, I cobbled
up a little turbine that can be slid in and out of an ethernet cable
- or even a Starlink proprietary cable - and is spun by the flow of
megabits through it. Once it's spinning from downloading something
spinful, I use a Briggs & Stratton Treysit Sirometer to measure the
RPM of the turbine which can readily be converted to Mbps with the
use of my secret and as-yet-unpatented algorithm. I know it's
accurate, because I calibrated the sirometer with my nearly always
consistent 2.7 Mbps DSL connection while streaming a video about the
Treysit.
I think you've just publicly admitted to violating multiple patented
and copyrighted phrases, materials, and techniques. I expect you'll be charged and prosecuted right after the DOJ finishes with the orange goon.
Note: In case you're wondering after refamiliarizing yourself with
Treysit operation, I put a tiny drop of JB Weld on one of the
turbine blades - without which the Treysit would have just sat there
doing literally nearly nothing.
.......ummmm......crap. I just had an inconveniently timed attack of
transparency which forces me to unwillingly tell you the unvarnished
and unhyperbolized truth. So...........I got the data from my Ookla
speed tests which you so considerately put into spreadsheet time and
speed columns for me. I used those columns to get average speeds for
selected time spans.
However comma in my defense, I did in fact manually operate the
mouse to get the Ookla tests started and to select the sections of
the speed column that LibreOffice used to calculate averages.
You, sir, are a modern miracle in an increasingly difficult and
challenging world. Your mastery of mice is second to none and your
ability to catalogue, correlate, disperse, dispense, and promote this
data is simply stellar. Even the experts say so.
96.37
4.09
35
Netflix is streaming just fine during above test.
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's
free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of
time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
bfh <redydog@rye.net> wrote:
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's
free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of
time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
She had thoughts of forming the Dumb Ass party until Pelosi told her that would be direct competition to the democrat party and might take votes away from them. She could run as an independent but that would have the same negative effect on democrats as the Dumb Ass party.
George.Anthony wrote:
bfh <redydog@rye.net> wrote:
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's
free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of
time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
She had thoughts of forming the Dumb Ass party until Pelosi told her that
would be direct competition to the democrat party and might take votes
away
from them. She could run as an independent but that would have the same
negative effect on democrats as the Dumb Ass party.
Independent. HawHawHaw! Are there any "independents" who don't caucus
with the Dumbass Dems? It's kinda like "moderates" - who are just closet Democrats.
On 8/17/2022 6:53 PM, bfh wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:You're right. I meant to put "independent" in quotes but my feeble old
bfh <redydog@rye.net> wrote:
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's
free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of
time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
She had thoughts of forming the Dumb Ass party until Pelosi told
her that
would be direct competition to the democrat party and might take
votes away
from them. She could run as an independent but that would have the
same
negative effect on democrats as the Dumb Ass party.
Independent. HawHawHaw! Are there any "independents" who don't
caucus with the Dumbass Dems? It's kinda like "moderates" - who are
just closet Democrats.
brain (I am qualified to register as a democrat now) forgot.
George.Anthony wrote:
bfh <red...@rye.net> wrote:
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's
free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of
time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
She had thoughts of forming the Dumb Ass party until Pelosi told her that would be direct competition to the democrat party and might take votes away from them. She could run as an independent but that would have the same negative effect on democrats as the Dumb Ass party.
Independent. HawHawHaw! Are there any "independents" who don't caucus
with the Dumbass Dems? It's kinda like "moderates" - who are just
closet Democrats.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:53:15 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:
bfh <red...@rye.net> wrote:Independent. HawHawHaw! Are there any "independents" who don't caucus
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's
free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of
time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
She had thoughts of forming the Dumb Ass party until Pelosi told her that >>> would be direct competition to the democrat party and might take votes away >>> from them. She could run as an independent but that would have the same
negative effect on democrats as the Dumb Ass party.
with the Dumbass Dems? It's kinda like "moderates" - who are just
closet Democrats.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
What prezactly is your purity test, so that you can make an informed decision about who might be a "closet Democrat" when you encounter one? It seems like the "slippage" on issues about having that "correct POV" could be very troubling?
The Vigilate Pollster
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's free
to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully considered
messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
George.Anthony wrote:
On 8/17/2022 6:53 PM, bfh wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:You're right. I meant to put "independent" in quotes but my feeble old
bfh <redydog@rye.net> wrote:
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's
free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of >>>>> time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
She had thoughts of forming the Dumb Ass party until Pelosi told her
that
would be direct competition to the democrat party and might take
votes away
from them. She could run as an independent but that would have the same >>>> negative effect on democrats as the Dumb Ass party.
Independent. HawHawHaw! Are there any "independents" who don't caucus
with the Dumbass Dems? It's kinda like "moderates" - who are just
closet Democrats.
brain (I am qualified to register as a democrat now) forgot.
damn. Qualified to register as a Dumbass? You have my sincere
condolences. Have you tried that jellyfish pill for your unfortunate disability?
On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:53:15 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
George.Anthony wrote:
bfh <red...@rye.net> wrote:Independent. HawHawHaw! Are there any "independents" who don't caucus
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's
free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of
time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
She had thoughts of forming the Dumb Ass party until Pelosi told her that >>> would be direct competition to the democrat party and might take votes away >>> from them. She could run as an independent but that would have the same
negative effect on democrats as the Dumb Ass party.
with the Dumbass Dems? It's kinda like "moderates" - who are just
closet Democrats.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
What prezactly is your purity test, so that you can make an informed decision about who might be a "closet Democrat" when you encounter one? It seems like the "slippage" on issues about having that "correct POV" could be very troubling?
The Vigilate Pollster
film...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:53:15 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:I don't talk to pollsters, and I don't reveal the metrics of my purity
George.Anthony wrote:
bfh <red...@rye.net> wrote:Independent. HawHawHaw! Are there any "independents" who don't caucus
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's
free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the passage of >>>>> time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
She had thoughts of forming the Dumb Ass party until Pelosi told her
that
would be direct competition to the democrat party and might take
votes away
from them. She could run as an independent but that would have the same >>>> negative effect on democrats as the Dumb Ass party.
with the Dumbass Dems? It's kinda like "moderates" - who are just
closet Democrats.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
What prezactly is your purity test, so that you can make an informed
decision about who might be a "closet Democrat" when you encounter
one? It seems like the "slippage" on issues about having that "correct
POV" could be very troubling?
The Vigilate Pollster
tests because it would just give the disingenuous dumbasses the
information they would need to try deceive me. Also, it's an ongoing continuing classified process and you don't have the necessary security clearance anyway to enter my SCIF.
Note: I don't consider anyone to be "pure". I just take what I can find,
and then ponder it into a conclusion I can live with and act on -
similar to what I did with all the Follow The Science bullshit.
On 8/17/2022 7:03 PM, bfh wrote:
film...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 4:53:15 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:I don't talk to pollsters, and I don't reveal the metrics of my
George.Anthony wrote:
bfh <red...@rye.net> wrote:Independent. HawHawHaw! Are there any "independents" who don't caucus
You might get your wish. Cheney got her butt whipped, so now she's >>>>>> free to concentrate on running for President.
Do you think she'll run as a Republican or a Democrat - or some
evolved triangulated affiliation to be revealed with carefully
considered messaging at the most efficacious moment in the
passage of
time?
The Honorable Bubba Pythagoras Darwin
Download Mbps
80.88
Upload Mbps
8.12
Ping ms 63
She had thoughts of forming the Dumb Ass party until Pelosi told
her that
would be direct competition to the democrat party and might take
votes away
from them. She could run as an independent but that would have
the same
negative effect on democrats as the Dumb Ass party.
with the Dumbass Dems? It's kinda like "moderates" - who are just
closet Democrats.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
What prezactly is your purity test, so that you can make an
informed decision about who might be a "closet Democrat" when you
encounter one? It seems like the "slippage" on issues about having
that "correct POV" could be very troubling?
The Vigilate Pollster
purity tests because it would just give the disingenuous dumbasses
the information they would need to try deceive me. Also, it's an
ongoing continuing classified process and you don't have the
necessary security clearance anyway to enter my SCIF.
Note: I don't consider anyone to be "pure". I just take what I can
find, and then ponder it into a conclusion I can live with and act
on - similar to what I did with all the Follow The Science bullshit.
Just follow the science when it suits you.
Kinda like the orange goon
did with his oath of office.
116.19
2.72
38
The FBI must be raiding my dishy.
Here's a fast one if you're pressed for time and just want to know your download speed. If you want to know more than that, and the passage of
time is literally not significant, you can wait a little longer and get
more metrics on your table.
https://fast.com
Ookla
Download Mbps
930.88
Upload Mbps
531.88
Ping ms 11
Fast.com
Your Internet speed is
1.0
Gbps
Latency
Unloaded
10 ms
Loaded
13 ms
Upload
Speed
730 Mbps
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 97:56:07 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,208 |
| Messages: | 5,334,587 |