In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already making
excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe
that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article because I
don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45. Out of
a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough about
this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted against
#45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the 95% of Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already making
excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe
that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article because I
don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45. Out of
a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough about
this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted against
#45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the 95% of Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
TB
On 1/16/2024 10:58 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already making
excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe
that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article because I >> don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45. Out of
a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough about
this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted against
#45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the 95% of
Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
TB
Trump came within one vote of winning every every county in the state. I would call that a landslide.
You better be careful though. If one of those lunatic liberal politician
blow buddies of yours steps in dog shit, given you are following in
their footsteps, you will need to clean your shoes as well.
On 1/16/2024 1:58 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
On 1/16/2024 10:58 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already
making
excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe
that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
     Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article
because I
don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45.
Out of
a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough
about
this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted
against
#45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the
95% of
Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
TB
Trump came within one vote of winning every every county in the
state. I would call that a landslide.
You better be careful though. If one of those lunatic liberal
politician blow buddies of yours steps in dog shit, given you are
following in their footsteps, you will need to clean your shoes as
well.
By the way, how many of those three million people are of voting age
and how many are registered republicans?
On 1/16/2024 1:58 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
On 1/16/2024 10:58 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already making >>>> excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe
that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article because I
don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45. Out of
a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough about
this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted against
#45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the 95% of
Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
TB
Trump came within one vote of winning every every county in the state.
I would call that a landslide.
You better be careful though. If one of those lunatic liberal
politician blow buddies of yours steps in dog shit, given you are
following in their footsteps, you will need to clean your shoes as well.
By the way, how many of those three million people are of voting age and
how many are registered republicans?
On 1/16/2024 1:59 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
On 1/16/2024 1:58 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
On 1/16/2024 10:58 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says... >>>>>
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already making >>>>> excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe
that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article because I
don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45. Out of >>>> a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough about >>>> this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted against >>>> #45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the 95% of >>>> Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
TB
Trump came within one vote of winning every every county in the
state. I would call that a landslide.
You better be careful though. If one of those lunatic liberal
politician blow buddies of yours steps in dog shit, given you are
following in their footsteps, you will need to clean your shoes as well.
By the way, how many of those three million people are of voting age
and how many are registered republicans?
The boob must not understand how a caucus works. Here's a quote from
the far right Associated Press
<https://apnews.com/article/trump-iowa-caucus-haley-desantis-cold-voting-begins-0af10f1ba21d488af54776b2c8d4028c>
"Former President Donald Trump scored a record-setting win"
"In what was the lowest-turnout caucus in a quarter-century,
participants endured life-threatening cold and dangerous driving
conditions to meet in hundreds of schools, churches and community
centers across the state. But those who ventured out delivered a roughly 30-point win for Trump that smashed the record for a contested Iowa Republican caucus with a margin of victory exceeding Bob Dole’s nearly 13-percentage-point victory in 1988. "
It's over. He's not only gonna be the next GOP nominee, he'll be the
next POTUS!!
In article <uo6n7q$1jb1i$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
On 1/16/2024 1:58 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
On 1/16/2024 10:58 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says... >>>>>
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already making >>>>> excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe
that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article because I
don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45. Out of >>>> a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough about >>>> this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted against >>>> #45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the 95% of >>>> Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
TB
Trump came within one vote of winning every every county in the state. I >>> would call that a landslide.
You better be careful though. If one of those lunatic liberal politician >>> blow buddies of yours steps in dog shit, given you are following in
their footsteps, you will need to clean your shoes as well.
By the way, how many of those three million people are of voting age and
how many are registered republicans?
lqtm What difference would it make? You're too damn dumb to be embarassed. He's the former President of the United States. He has name recognition up his orange whazoo. He's supposedly the leader of the Republican party. Two of his PACs spent a combined total of over $200
for every vote he got. And the former leader of the free world can
barely eke out a simple majority from his own party. Oh yeah, this just
has "Good News" written all over it.
TB
On 1/16/2024 5:13 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
In article <uo6n7q$1jb1i$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
On 1/16/2024 1:58 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
On 1/16/2024 10:58 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says... >>>>>>
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already
making
excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe >>>>>> that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article >>>>> because I
don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45.
Out of
a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough
about
this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted
against
#45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the
95% of
Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
TB
Trump came within one vote of winning every every county in the
state. I
would call that a landslide.
You better be careful though. If one of those lunatic liberal
politician
blow buddies of yours steps in dog shit, given you are following in
their footsteps, you will need to clean your shoes as well.
By the way, how many of those three million people are of voting age and >>> how many are registered republicans?
lqtm What difference would it make? You're too damn dumb to be
embarassed. He's the former President of the United States. He has name
recognition up his orange whazoo. He's supposedly the leader of the
Republican party. Two of his PACs spent a combined total of over $200
for every vote he got. And the former leader of the free world can
barely eke out a simple majority from his own party. Oh yeah, this just
has "Good News" written all over it.
TB
Hey dumb ass, he beat both of his closest rivals by 30 points. I don't
call that eking out a win. Are you really that dumb or do you just play
dumb on the internet?
In article <uo6n7q$1jb1i$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
On 1/16/2024 1:58 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
On 1/16/2024 10:58 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says... >>>>>
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already making >>>>> excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe
that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article because I
don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45. Out of >>>> a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough about >>>> this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted against >>>> #45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the 95% of >>>> Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
TB
Trump came within one vote of winning every every county in the state. I >>> would call that a landslide.
You better be careful though. If one of those lunatic liberal politician >>> blow buddies of yours steps in dog shit, given you are following in
their footsteps, you will need to clean your shoes as well.
By the way, how many of those three million people are of voting age and
how many are registered republicans?
lqtm What difference would it make? You're too damn dumb to be embarassed. He's the former President of the United States. He has name recognition up his orange whazoo. He's supposedly the leader of the Republican party. Two of his PACs spent a combined total of over $200
for every vote he got. And the former leader of the free world can
barely eke out a simple majority from his own party. Oh yeah, this just
has "Good News" written all over it.
TB
In article <MPG.4010d630122444109896b0@reader80.eternal-september.org>, technobarbarian@gmail.com says...
In article <uo79bg$1m7c0$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
Hey dumb ass, he beat both of his closest rivals by 30 points. I don't
call that eking out a win. Are you really that dumb or do you just play
dumb on the internet?
Unfortunately for him, he won't be running against any of those
losers in the general election, where he has never won the popular vote.
But hey, I stumbled on half an answer to your dumbassed
questions. After spending millions of other people's dollars he got the
got the vote of 2.7% of the registered voters in Iowa.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218601498
TB
It's also worth noting that this means that around 2.6% of the registered voters in Iowa went out in bad weather to vote against #45.
Yeah, this is a yuge win.
TB
In article <uo6n7q$1jb1i$2@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...
On 1/16/2024 1:58 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
On 1/16/2024 10:58 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
In article <uo67m3$1gepp$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says... >>>>>
Iowa caucuses one day removed and the leftist dolts are already making >>>>> excuses. I expect they will get even more loony (if you can believe
that's possible) as we get closer to Trump being the nominee.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iowa-results-show-weakness-donald-trump-democrat-governor-claims
Excuses? I didn't bother to read the Fakes News article because I
don't think any excuses are necessary. It was a bad day for #45. Out of >>>> a population of over 3 million people around 110,000 cared enough about >>>> this event to show up. And out of those people around 49% voted against >>>> #45. If you add the 49% of Republicans who don't want #45 to the 95% of >>>> Democrats who don't want #45 it doesn't add up to anywhere close a
majority for the orange asshole.
TB
Trump came within one vote of winning every every county in the state. I >>> would call that a landslide.
You better be careful though. If one of those lunatic liberal politician >>> blow buddies of yours steps in dog shit, given you are following in
their footsteps, you will need to clean your shoes as well.
By the way, how many of those three million people are of voting age and
how many are registered republicans?
I got to wondering about the precise numbers. They don't make the orange dumbass look any better, but they *might* help the mathmatically impaired to understand what just happened.
"Iowa Caucuses drew 15% of state's registered Republicans"
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/cauc us/2024/01/16/iowa-caucus-turnout-registered-republicans-15-percent- cold-weather-snow-donald-trump-expectations/72067396007/
Despite knowing in advance that their candidate would win, 56,260 registered Republicans went out in freezing weather to vote for #45.
That is just barely 51% of the people who voted.
Despite knowing in advance that their candidate would lose,
54,038 people went out in freezing to vote against #45. That's 49
percent of the people who voted. The supposed leader of the Republican
party was only endorsed by 51% of his supposed followers. The numbers
aren't likely to get any better when you add in people who aren't retrumplicans.
In article <47YpN.220583$PuZ9.37133@fx11.iad>, redydog@rye.net says...2F%2Fnewsletter%2F288abd64-f3b9-55a1-bb4b-96ea6caae0c9
This, from the NYT:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
...
The first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses delivered him a sweeping victory
...
Not only did he win in a landslide anyway, but his 30-point margin of
victory set a record for a contested Iowa Republican caucus.
...
In county after county across the Iowa countryside, Trump obtained
more than 60 percent of the vote ? and sometimes 70 percent ? with his
rivals languishing in the teens or single digits.
...
------------------------------------------------------------------
https://messaging-custom-newsletters.nytimes.com/dynamic/render?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20240116&instance_id=112632&nl=the-morning&paid_regi=2&productCode=NN®i_id=70663888&segment_id=155440&te=1&user_id=86978059d95a9105c5d08ceea5446896&uri=nyt%3A%
"This, from the NYT: -------------------------------------------------------------------
...
The first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses delivered him a sweeping victory
...
Not only did he win in a landslide anyway, but his 30-point margin of
victory set a record for a contested Iowa Republican caucus.
...
In county after county across the Iowa countryside, Trump obtained
more than 60 percent of the vote ? and sometimes 70 percent ? with his
rivals languishing in the teens or single digits.
...
------------------------------------------------------------------ https://messaging-custom-newsletters.nytimes.com/dynamic/render? campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20240116&instance_id=112632&nl=the- morning&paid_regi=2&productCode=NN®i_id=70663888&segment_id=155440 &te=1&user_id=86978059d95a9105c5d08ceea5446896&uri=nyt%3A%2F% 2Fnewsletter%2F288abd64-f3b9-55a1-bb4b-96ea6caae0c9
"Shake-Up by a Desperate DeSantis Opens Wider Path for Haley in New
Hampshire
Ron DeSantis?s super PAC began layoffs on the same day he signaled he
would largely bypass New Hampshire?s primary election and train his
efforts on South Carolina."
"Since December, Ms. Haley and her allies have pointed to the
possibility of a one-on-one race in New Hampshire as an opportunity for
an outright victory there.
Internal polling conducted last month in the state by Americans for Prosperity Action, a super PAC founded by the billionaire Koch family
that is backing Ms. Haley?s campaign, found that in a full field of Republican candidates, she trailed Mr. Trump by 45 percent to 32
percent.
But in a head-to-head matchup between Ms. Haley and Mr. Trump, without
Mr. DeSantis, Vivek Ramaswamy or Chris Christie ? both of whom have
since left the race ? the polling found Ms. Haley in a statistical tie
with Mr. Trump, 48 percent to 45 percent."
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/17/us/politics/desantis-layoffs-super- pac.html? utm_source=newsshowcase&utm_medium=gnews&utm_campaign=CDAQ9Y397rra5vKOAR iVkaP2- PiO9o0BKg8IACoHCAowjuuKAzCWrzw&utm_content=rundown&gaa_at=g&gaa_n=AZsHK_ mea01h1Gl2SuR8wxGzJy9VdZobrxQz7 _e7qqSs7qlnwBp3IOVo0QLTEGso22qLzGjv0MydPu4RKCzGEn8hCbQ%3D&gaa_ts= 65a8836d&gaa_sig=u2IDMTsO3Nfoa2CjcRXNQmBqVb33EhjNBeAmVYsRDSJzft3iSqIQvnI CUag5kOtSs8CLJnDMKPFwko-xhrpmqA%3D%3D
From this point on, going forward, it's very charitable to say
that the former president't support in his own party is "soft".
TB
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 98:06:56 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,208 |
| Messages: | 5,334,587 |