• Re: What do you have to lose? Take it

    From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Thu Jan 4 16:26:23 2024
    On 1/4/2024 3:37 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:


    "Nearly 17,000 people may have died after taking hydroxycholoroquine
    during the first wave of COVID, according to a study by French
    researchers.

    The anti-malaria drug was prescribed to some patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic, "despite the absence of evidence documenting its clinical benefits," the researchers point out
    in their paper, published in the February issue of Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.

    Now, researchers have estimated that some 16,990 people in six countries
    ? France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the U.S. ? may have died as
    a result."

    "In fact, they say the figure may be far higher given the study only
    concerns six countries from March to July 2020, when the drug was
    prescribed much more widely.

    Hydroxychloroquine gained prominence partly due to French virologist
    Didier Raoult who had headed the Méditerranée Infection Foundation hospital, but was later removed amid growing controversy.

    It was also considered something of a ?miracle cure? by the then-U.S. President Donald Trump, who said: ?What do you have to lose? Take it.?"

    https://www.politico.eu/article/hydroxychloroquine-could-have-caused- 17000-deaths-during-covid-study-finds/

    TB

    I have no data to back me up but these French "researchers" themselves
    admit it was during the first wave. Of course we all know the first wave
    hit before few, if anyone was aware of what was occurring and what it
    was (except Fauci). Given that, it's likely that in many of those cases
    the inflicted were already too far gone to recover.

    On another note, just who are these French researchers? What are their
    names and what are their backgrounds? Saying French researchers is like
    saying "some say". Also note in the link the weasel words "could have
    caused". Well, heart disease, cancer, etc. also "could have caused".
    --
    "There are none so blind as liberals who will not see"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to George.Anthony on Thu Jan 4 18:17:14 2024
    On 1/4/2024 4:26 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
    On 1/4/2024 3:37 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:


    "Nearly 17,000 people may have died after taking hydroxycholoroquine
    during the first wave of COVID, according to a study by French
    researchers.

    The anti-malaria drug was prescribed to some patients hospitalized with
    COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic, "despite the absence of
    evidence documenting its clinical benefits," the researchers point out
    in their paper, published in the February issue of Biomedicine &
    Pharmacotherapy.

    Now, researchers have estimated that some 16,990 people in six countries
    ? France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the U.S. ? may have died as
    a result."

    "In fact, they say the figure may be far higher given the study only
    concerns six countries from March to July 2020, when the drug was
    prescribed much more widely.

    Hydroxychloroquine gained prominence partly due to French virologist
    Didier Raoult who had headed the Méditerranée Infection Foundation
    hospital, but was later removed amid growing controversy.

    It was also considered something of a ?miracle cure? by the then-U.S.
    President Donald Trump, who said: ?What do you have to lose? Take it.?"

    https://www.politico.eu/article/hydroxychloroquine-could-have-caused-
    17000-deaths-during-covid-study-finds/

    TB

    I have no data to back me up but these French "researchers" themselves
    admit it was during the first wave. Of course we all know the first wave
    hit before few, if anyone was aware of what was occurring and what it
    was (except Fauci). Given that, it's likely that in many of those cases
    the inflicted were already too far gone to recover.

    I would tend to agree. People were desperate as there were limited therapeutics available and going on a ventilator was a death sentence.

    On another note, just who are these French researchers? What are their
    names and what are their backgrounds? Saying French researchers is like saying "some say".  Also note in the link the weasel words "could have caused". Well, heart disease, cancer, etc. also "could have caused".

    If you go to the linked study, they actually do admit the statistical
    analysis they have done is possibly quite wrong. The study authors
    aren't the one who inserts Trump into the matter, either. That would be
    the left wing Rag Politico. If you really read between the lines and
    look into some of the participants, they are getting money from some of
    the BigPharma orgs, and are making a case for the NEXT pandemic as laid
    out in UN Event 201. They don't want doctors to be able to use off
    label drugs in treatment for much of anything. They want control, and
    with the recent depopulation efforts in the news, it is a bit
    frightening to think these people want even control in handling another pandemic. But don't take my word for it, below is directly quoted from
    their "discussion" portion of the paper. Even if you believed their
    numbers, remembering how many people died, it's a pretty small number.
    They sure worked hard to come up with something, but they don't know shit!

    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5 (i.e.
    the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ≈3000 deaths) or underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related
    to HCQ would be ≈30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on mortality was
    the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."


    --
    Stand With Israel!
    NOTE: If you use Google Groups I don't see you,
    unless you're whitelisted and that's doubtful.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Thu Jan 4 21:26:41 2024
    On 1/4/2024 7:19 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <un7bad$3q9ur$3@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...

    On 1/4/2024 3:37 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:


    "Nearly 17,000 people may have died after taking hydroxycholoroquine
    during the first wave of COVID, according to a study by French
    researchers.

    The anti-malaria drug was prescribed to some patients hospitalized with
    COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic, "despite the absence of
    evidence documenting its clinical benefits," the researchers point out
    in their paper, published in the February issue of Biomedicine &
    Pharmacotherapy.

    Now, researchers have estimated that some 16,990 people in six countries >>> ? France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the U.S. ? may have died as
    a result."

    "In fact, they say the figure may be far higher given the study only
    concerns six countries from March to July 2020, when the drug was
    prescribed much more widely.

    Hydroxychloroquine gained prominence partly due to French virologist
    Didier Raoult who had headed the Méditerranée Infection Foundation
    hospital, but was later removed amid growing controversy.

    It was also considered something of a ?miracle cure? by the then-U.S.
    President Donald Trump, who said: ?What do you have to lose? Take it.?"

    https://www.politico.eu/article/hydroxychloroquine-could-have-caused-
    17000-deaths-during-covid-study-finds/

    TB

    I have no data to back me up but these French "researchers" themselves
    admit it was during the first wave. Of course we all know the first wave
    hit before few, if anyone was aware of what was occurring and what it
    was (except Fauci). Given that, it's likely that in many of those cases
    the inflicted were already too far gone to recover.

    On another note, just who are these French researchers? What are their
    names and what are their backgrounds? Saying French researchers is like
    saying "some say". Also note in the link the weasel words "could have
    caused". Well, heart disease, cancer, etc. also "could have caused".

    LOL, Like you really care about any of this. It wouldn't matter to
    you if one of them was Louis Pasteur. You just enjoy seeing yourself
    singing and dancing around. If you really gave a damn you could look
    this stuff up for yourself. All you really care about is shucking and
    jiving.

    No matter how you slice and dice it, your fat assed hero was
    telling idiots to eat that shit, because he was hoping for a miracle. It looks like both that asshole and you might have been smart enough that
    you didn't eat any. BTW, whatever happened to that miracle?

    "Jan. 3, 2024"

    "Covid Has Resurged, but Scientists See a Diminished Threat
    Hospitalizations have ticked upward, and there are at least 1,200 Covid- related deaths each week. Americans should mask more often, and
    vaccination rates remain too low, experts say."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/03/health/covid-masks-vaccinations.html

    LOL, and the best I can hope for is yet more shuckin' and jivin', without any real substance.

    TB

    I don't need to look it up since you copied and pasted the pertinent information. Besides, I don't have an internet wayback machine as
    effective as yours. So you can't supply the data I asked for. Apparently
    you think the wordier you get the more correct you are. You are one
    person who uses many words to say nothing. By the way, your crystal ball
    is awfully cloudy. How in hell would you know what I think or care
    about. So stuff that up your kinky racist ass... if you can get past
    your head.
    --
    "There are none so blind as liberals who will not see"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to sticks on Tue Jan 9 09:47:49 2024
    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5 (i.e.
    the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ≈3000 deaths) or underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related
    to HCQ would be ≈30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on mortality was the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin. There used to be libs who wanted truth.
    Very few anymore. Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>


    --
    Stand With Israel!
    NOTE: If you use Google Groups I don't see you,
    unless you're whitelisted and that's doubtful.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Tue Jan 9 17:37:59 2024
    On 1/9/2024 2:27 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5 (i.e.
    the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or
    underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related
    to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on mortality was >>> the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin. There used to be libs who wanted truth.
    Very few anymore. Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>

    So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever been brave enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid? Inquiring
    minds would like to know about your actual experience with this miracle
    cure? lqtm

    TB
    You're a moron. Answer your own question.
    --
    "There are none so blind as liberals who will not see"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kmiller@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Tue Jan 9 19:16:36 2024
    On 1/9/2024 12:27 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5 (i.e.
    the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or
    underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related
    to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on mortality was >>> the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin. There used to be libs who wanted truth.
    Very few anymore. Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>

    So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever been brave enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid? Inquiring
    minds would like to know about your actual experience with this miracle
    cure? lqtm

    TB

    Ivermectin is to Covid what truth is to retrumplicans. Useless.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Wed Jan 10 12:16:16 2024
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5 (i.e.
    the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or
    underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related
    to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on mortality was >>> the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin. There used to be libs who wanted truth.
    Very few anymore. Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>

    So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever been brave enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid? Inquiring
    minds would like to know about your actual experience with this miracle
    cure? lqtm

    So look, I have not swallowed even a drop of it, but I did, like, a
    thought experiment about, you know, swallowing it............and it
    worked - I literally have not gotten Covid in the passage of time
    since then.

    Note: My voluntary answering of your question is not a self-admission
    of being one of any of the alleged morons you refer to.

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kmiller@21:1/5 to bfh on Wed Jan 10 10:44:04 2024
    On 1/10/2024 9:16 AM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5 (i.e. >>>> the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or
    underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related >>>> to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on mortality
    was
    the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin.  There used to be libs who wanted truth. >>> Very few anymore.  Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>

          So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever been brave >> enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid? Inquiring
    minds would like to know about your actual experience with this miracle
    cure? lqtm

    So look, I have not swallowed even a drop of it, but I did, like, a
    thought experiment

    HawHawHaw!

    about, you know, swallowing it............and it
    worked - I literally have not gotten Covid in the passage of time since
    then.

    Note: My voluntary answering of your question is not a self-admission of being one of any of the alleged morons you refer to.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to bfh on Wed Jan 10 12:30:53 2024
    On 1/10/2024 11:16 AM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5 (i.e. >>>> the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or
    underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related >>>> to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on mortality
    was
    the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin.  There used to be libs who wanted truth. >>> Very few anymore.  Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>

          So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever been brave >> enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid? Inquiring
    minds would like to know about your actual experience with this miracle
    cure? lqtm

    So look, I have not swallowed even a drop of it, but I did, like, a
    thought experiment about, you know, swallowing it............and it
    worked - I literally have not gotten Covid in the passage of time since
    then.

    Note: My voluntary answering of your question is not a self-admission of being one of any of the alleged morons you refer to.

    Gawd that Boob is an idiot. I have no problem answering if I have tried
    it or not. I am unvaxxed, and asked my doctor if he would prescribe it
    if I wanted it. He answered affirmatively. I got covid, it was
    relatively minor for me, and I didn't feel I needed anything to get over
    it, and wanted to instead gain totally natural immunity. If I got
    worse, I would have taken it without hesitation. Same goes for HCQ.

    What sickens me is the idiots on the left who refuse to address the real problem of where this originated, and the reasons for denying
    therapeutic alternatives to vaccination, and granting BigPharma
    emergency use and immunity from prosecution for any adverse affects of
    their experimental mRNA bio-weapon. Like the article origally quoted,
    it all gets ignored in favor of harming Trump.

    They refuse to read or listen to anything questioning the party
    narrative. They are oblivious to the fact millions of people worldwide
    were killed by not only the virus, but now the experimental vaccine with
    not only cardiovascular issues, but deficient immune system responses to infection and even turbo cancers in numbers never seen before. Of
    course they are busy claiming all this is coincidental and a myth. For
    some unknown reason, they appear to take everything the corrupt WHO and BigPharma claim at face value, even though they knew ahead of time the lock-downs, closing of businesses and schools, and sending everyone
    indoors was the wrong way to deal with a pandemic. You could go to
    Walmart, but not church. Some places even used it as a reason to limit
    one's ability to buy a weapon for self defense, which would be critical
    when all hell breaks loose and anarchy sets in.

    Instead of intelligently addressing real issues associated with this
    farce pandemic, they instead wish to again find a way to harm Trump.
    Wash, rinse, repeat. You also have to remember these are the same
    people who insist an 8 year old can chop off his weiner if he so
    chooses, and a parent has no say in the matter. Yet an adult cannot
    have access to a widely used effective drug on their deathbed if they so choose. The same people who insist a underage teenage woman should be
    able to abort a living, breathing, heart beating baby right up until
    birth, because it is "Her body, her choice." Yet an elderly person or healthcare worker at great risk of getting covid cannot use HCQ as a prophylactic alternative if they so choose. Total fucking hypocrisy!


    --
    Stand With Israel!
    NOTE: If you use Google Groups I don't see you,
    unless you're whitelisted and that's doubtful.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Wed Jan 10 15:01:29 2024
    On 1/10/2024 10:46 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unklcj$26idb$1@dont-email.me>, ganthony@gmail.org says...

    On 1/9/2024 2:27 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5 (i.e. >>>>> the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or >>>>> underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related >>>>> to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on mortality was >>>>> the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin. There used to be libs who wanted truth. >>>> Very few anymore. Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>

    So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever been brave >>> enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid? Inquiring
    minds would like to know about your actual experience with this miracle
    cure? lqtm

    TB
    You're a moron. Answer your own question.

    LOL My answer should be obvious to all but the completely
    oblivious. The way you're dodging the question makes your answer obvious
    too. You hypocrites are preaching a gospel that you don't actually
    believe yourself.

    TB
    First, I was just pointing out your own moronism, which has nothing to
    do with Ivermectin. Second, unlike yourself, I am far from a hypocrite.
    Third, I have preached no gospel of any kind here, much less for or
    against Ivermectin.

    You really need to get your comprehensioner calibrated.
    --
    "There are none so blind as liberals who will not see"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to kmiller on Wed Jan 10 15:23:10 2024
    kmiller wrote:
    On 1/10/2024 9:16 AM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5
    (i.e.
    the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or >>>>> underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths
    related
    to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on
    mortality was
    the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin.  There used to be libs who wanted
    truth.
    Very few anymore.  Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>


          So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever
    been brave
    enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid?
    Inquiring
    minds would like to know about your actual experience with this
    miracle
    cure? lqtm

    So look, I have not swallowed even a drop of it, but I did, like, a
    thought experiment

    HawHawHaw!

    Hey. I'm still capable of thought.............more or less.
    (here's a measurement of me thinking a thought)
    Download Mbps
    938.35
    Upload Mbps
    521.49
    Ping ms 11

    about, you know, swallowing it............and it worked - I
    literally have not gotten Covid in the passage of time since then.

    Note: My voluntary answering of your question is not a
    self-admission of being one of any of the alleged morons you refer to.




    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to sticks on Wed Jan 10 15:08:56 2024
    On 1/10/2024 12:30 PM, sticks wrote:
    On 1/10/2024 11:16 AM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5
    (i.e.
    the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or >>>>> underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths related >>>>> to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on
    mortality was
    the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin.  There used to be libs who wanted truth. >>>> Very few anymore.  Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>

          So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever been brave
    enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid? Inquiring
    minds would like to know about your actual experience with this miracle
    cure? lqtm

    So look, I have not swallowed even a drop of it, but I did, like, a
    thought experiment about, you know, swallowing it............and it
    worked - I literally have not gotten Covid in the passage of time
    since then.

    Note: My voluntary answering of your question is not a self-admission
    of being one of any of the alleged morons you refer to.

    Gawd that Boob is an idiot.  I have no problem answering if I have tried
    it or not.  I am unvaxxed, and asked my doctor if he would prescribe it
    if I wanted it.  He answered affirmatively.  I got covid, it was
    relatively minor for me, and I didn't feel I needed anything to get over
    it, and wanted to instead gain totally natural immunity.  If I got
    worse, I would have taken it without hesitation.  Same goes for HCQ.

    What sickens me is the idiots on the left who refuse to address the real problem of where this originated, and the reasons for denying
    therapeutic alternatives to vaccination, and granting BigPharma
    emergency use and immunity from prosecution for any adverse affects of
    their experimental mRNA bio-weapon.  Like the article origally quoted,
    it all gets ignored in favor of harming Trump.

    They refuse to read or listen to anything questioning the party
    narrative.  They are oblivious to the fact millions of people worldwide
    were killed by not only the virus, but now the experimental vaccine with
    not only cardiovascular issues, but deficient immune system responses to infection and  even turbo cancers in numbers never seen before.  Of
    course they are busy claiming all this is coincidental and a myth.  For
    some unknown reason, they appear to take everything the corrupt WHO and BigPharma claim at face value, even though they knew ahead of time the lock-downs, closing of businesses and schools, and sending everyone
    indoors was the wrong way to deal with a pandemic.  You could go to
    Walmart, but not church.  Some places even used it as a reason to limit one's ability to buy a weapon for self defense, which would be critical
    when all hell breaks loose and anarchy sets in.

    Instead of intelligently addressing real issues associated with this
    farce pandemic, they instead wish to again find a way to harm Trump.
    Wash, rinse, repeat.  You also have to remember these are the same
    people who insist an 8 year old can chop off his weiner if he so
    chooses, and a parent has no say in the matter.  Yet an adult cannot
    have access to a widely used effective drug on their deathbed if they so choose.  The same people who insist a underage teenage woman should be
    able to abort a living, breathing, heart beating baby right up until
    birth, because it is "Her body, her choice."  Yet an elderly person or healthcare worker at great risk of getting covid cannot use HCQ as a prophylactic alternative if they so choose.  Total fucking hypocrisy!



    Liberals are the quintessential followers. They need government to tell
    them where to go, what to do, and when and how to do it. They have no
    ability to think for themselves and must be told what to think by
    government and media (oops, there I go with the redundancy again).
    --
    "Liberals, obliviots blindly obeying government for millenia."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kmiller@21:1/5 to bfh on Wed Jan 10 15:40:34 2024
    On 1/10/2024 12:23 PM, bfh wrote:
    kmiller wrote:
    On 1/10/2024 9:16 AM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5
    (i.e.
    the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or >>>>>> underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths
    related
    to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on
    mortality was
    the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin.  There used to be libs who wanted
    truth.
    Very few anymore.  Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>

          So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever
    been brave
    enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid? Inquiring >>>> minds would like to know about your actual experience with this miracle >>>> cure? lqtm

    So look, I have not swallowed even a drop of it, but I did, like, a
    thought experiment

    HawHawHaw!

    Hey. I'm still capable of thought.............more or less.
    (here's a measurement of me thinking a thought)
    Download Mbps
    938.35
    Upload Mbps
    521.49
    Ping ms 11

    Obviously a weaponized conspiracy theory instigated by an immunized
    Jewish space laser drunk on Invermectin.


    about, you know, swallowing it............and it worked - I literally
    have not gotten Covid in the passage of time since then.

    Note: My voluntary answering of your question is not a self-admission
    of being one of any of the alleged morons you refer to.





    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to George.Anthony on Wed Jan 17 16:06:05 2024
    On 1/10/2024 3:08 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
    On 1/10/2024 12:30 PM, sticks wrote:
    On 1/10/2024 11:16 AM, bfh wrote:
    Technobarbarian wrote:
    In article <unjpr5$228r9$1@dont-email.me>, wolverine01@charter.net
    says...

    On 1/4/2024 6:17 PM, sticks wrote:

    --snip--
    "In other words, our results might be overestimated by a factor 5
    (i.e.
    the actual number of deaths related to HCQ would be ?3000 deaths) or >>>>>> underestimated by a factor 2 (i.e. the actual number of deaths
    related
    to HCQ would be ?30000 deaths). Thus, the effect of HCQ on
    mortality was
    the main source of uncertainty for the proposed estimates."

    RFK Jr. on HCQ and Ivermectin.  There used to be libs who wanted
    truth.
    Very few anymore.  Now they all just act like sheep.

    <https://rumble.com/v45ym9w-rfk-jr.-unloads-the-truth-about-ivermectin-to-the-hill-it-was-really-a-mira.html>

          So? Riddle me this Batman: Have any of you morons ever been brave
    enough to swallow even a drop of this shite? Are you now, or have you
    ever eaten this miracle cure as a way to guard against Covid? Inquiring >>>> minds would like to know about your actual experience with this miracle >>>> cure? lqtm

    So look, I have not swallowed even a drop of it, but I did, like, a
    thought experiment about, you know, swallowing it............and it
    worked - I literally have not gotten Covid in the passage of time
    since then.

    Note: My voluntary answering of your question is not a self-admission
    of being one of any of the alleged morons you refer to.

    Gawd that Boob is an idiot.  I have no problem answering if I have
    tried it or not.  I am unvaxxed, and asked my doctor if he would
    prescribe it if I wanted it.  He answered affirmatively.  I got covid,
    it was relatively minor for me, and I didn't feel I needed anything to
    get over it, and wanted to instead gain totally natural immunity.  If
    I got worse, I would have taken it without hesitation.  Same goes for
    HCQ.

    What sickens me is the idiots on the left who refuse to address the
    real problem of where this originated, and the reasons for denying
    therapeutic alternatives to vaccination, and granting BigPharma
    emergency use and immunity from prosecution for any adverse affects of
    their experimental mRNA bio-weapon.  Like the article origally quoted,
    it all gets ignored in favor of harming Trump.

    They refuse to read or listen to anything questioning the party
    narrative.  They are oblivious to the fact millions of people
    worldwide were killed by not only the virus, but now the experimental
    vaccine with not only cardiovascular issues, but deficient immune
    system responses to infection and  even turbo cancers in numbers never
    seen before.  Of course they are busy claiming all this is
    coincidental and a myth.  For some unknown reason, they appear to take
    everything the corrupt WHO and BigPharma claim at face value, even
    though they knew ahead of time the lock-downs, closing of businesses
    and schools, and sending everyone indoors was the wrong way to deal
    with a pandemic.  You could go to Walmart, but not church.  Some
    places even used it as a reason to limit one's ability to buy a weapon
    for self defense, which would be critical when all hell breaks loose
    and anarchy sets in.

    Instead of intelligently addressing real issues associated with this
    farce pandemic, they instead wish to again find a way to harm Trump.
    Wash, rinse, repeat.  You also have to remember these are the same
    people who insist an 8 year old can chop off his weiner if he so
    chooses, and a parent has no say in the matter.  Yet an adult cannot
    have access to a widely used effective drug on their deathbed if they
    so choose.  The same people who insist a underage teenage woman should
    be able to abort a living, breathing, heart beating baby right up
    until birth, because it is "Her body, her choice."  Yet an elderly
    person or healthcare worker at great risk of getting covid cannot use
    HCQ as a prophylactic alternative if they so choose.  Total fucking
    hypocrisy!



    Liberals are the quintessential followers. They need government to tell
    them where to go, what to do, and when and how to do it. They have no
    ability to think for themselves and must be told what to think by
    government and media (oops, there I go with the redundancy again).

    Court actions are proving it actually was a conspiracy on the part of
    the Government to stop the use of Ivermectin. Of course, that won't
    stop the retarded liberals from still repeating the same old talking
    points. So much for the party of science. Bunch of fucking hypocrites
    are willing to actually harm people because of political ideology. It's
    past stupid, it's now dangerous behavior.

    <https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/feds-hide-details-about-anti-ivermectin-campaign-response-doctors>

    --
    Stand With Israel!
    NOTE: If you use Google Groups I don't see you,
    unless you're whitelisted and that's doubtful.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)