1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" - to
support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and then
take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" - to
support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and then
take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" - to
support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it
comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and then
take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House repubes. I'm
sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
On 10/22/2023 1:59 PM, kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" - to
support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it
comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and then
take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House repubes. I'm
sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
I want to make sure you resident NAGA dimocrats understand something so
I will say it twice and then I will tell you what I told you. It is NOT conservatives screwing up the speaker election. It is swamp, i.e.,
"moderate" republicans or dimocrats lite. Let me say it again, it is
swamp, i.e., "moderate" republicans or dimocrats lite. And just to make
sure you pea brain loons understand, what I told you, it is swamp, i.e., "moderate" republicans or dimocrats lite.
So, if you want to be critical of the process, in effect it is your
people doing the screwing up. No conservative would even consider
working with NAGA dimocrats to choose a speaker.
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" - to
support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it
comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and then
take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House repubes. I'm
sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" - to
support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it
comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and then
take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House repubes. I'm
sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
On 10/22/2023 4:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" -
to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it
comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and
then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration >>>>
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House repubes.
I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
Yes. There definitely is a problem with the House repubes.
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" - to
support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it
comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and then
take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House repubes. I'm
sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
On 10/22/2023 6:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" -
to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it
comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and
then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration >>>>
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House repubes.
I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
This guy says the problem is libtards are no longer objective. I
don't really feel that way. They just don't care, as long as they get their marxist society. He's spot on with everything else.
<https://rumble.com/v3r075t-dude-sums-up-leftists-skewed-perceptions-of-biden-vs-trump-in-under-3-minut.html>
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" - to
support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and then
take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:52:49 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:--
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked. 2.
Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals. 3.
Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" -
to support the denial. 4. If inconvenient questions are asked,
decline to comment. 5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call
it comprehensive reform. 7. Finally, when things start to
improve, admit that there were problems, but claim that they were
caused by somebody else, and then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
To listen to you whining you would think the current administration
had reduced border security. We are actually putting more resources
into border security now than we have at any other time in your
life. You might not have noticed this, but there are always limits
on what congress is willing to spend on the border.
On 10/22/2023 6:45 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 4:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure"
- to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call
it comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and
then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration >>>>>>
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House
repubes. I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
Yes. There definitely is a problem with the House repubes.
You should have been a politician.
October average:
137 DL
15 UL
32 Latency
That ain't bad. I learned that a really, really, hugely, tremendously, everybody said so even the experts, heavy rainfall takes my dishy
offline 'til it passes.
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 4:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" -
to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it
comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and
then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration >>>>>
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House repubes.
I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
Yes. There definitely is a problem with the House repubes.
You should have been a politician.
October average:
137 DL
15 UL
32 Latency
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:52:49 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:--
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked. 2.
Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals. 3.
Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" -
to support the denial. 4. If inconvenient questions are asked,
decline to comment. 5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call
it comprehensive reform. 7. Finally, when things start to
improve, admit that there were problems, but claim that they were
caused by somebody else, and then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration >>
bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
To listen to you whining you would think the current administrationLOL!
had reduced border security. We are actually putting more resources
into border security now than we have at any other time in your
life. You might not have noticed this, but there are always limits
on what congress is willing to spend on the border.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:52:49 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked. 2.
Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals. 3.
Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" -
to support the denial. 4. If inconvenient questions are asked,
decline to comment. 5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call
it comprehensive reform. 7. Finally, when things start to
improve, admit that there were problems, but claim that they were
caused by somebody else, and then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 6:45 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 4:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" - >>>>>>> to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call it >>>>>>> comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were
problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and
then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration >>>>>>>
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House repubes. >>>>>> I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
Yes. There definitely is a problem with the House repubes.
You should have been a politician.
October average:
137 DL
15 UL
32 Latency
That ain't bad. I learned that a really, really, hugely, tremendously,
everybody said so even the experts, heavy rainfall takes my dishy
offline 'til it passes.
In my experience, local rain itself - no matter how heavy - doesn't
matter much.
I allege that for weather to shut me down, t-storms or
dense rain clouds have to cover a wide expanse of sky. All we need is
one sat to have a connection, and these days, I allegedly have 8-12 sats
up there all over the sky most of the time. Also, all the additional
sats up there now have made my evil pine trees inefficacious as obstructionists.
I further allege that this supports my previous allegations: https://starlink.sx/
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 6:58:05 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:problem forever. LOL
Technobarbarian wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:52:49 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:--
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked. 2.
Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals. 3.
Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" -
to support the denial. 4. If inconvenient questions are asked,
decline to comment. 5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call
it comprehensive reform. 7. Finally, when things start to
improve, admit that there were problems, but claim that they were
caused by somebody else, and then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration >>>>
LOL!bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
To listen to you whining you would think the current administration
had reduced border security. We are actually putting more resources
into border security now than we have at any other time in your
life. You might not have noticed this, but there are always limits
on what congress is willing to spend on the border.
--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
If you're interested these guys break down the numbers:
"The Cost of Immigration Enforcement and Border Security"
"The federal government has already met the border security benchmarks laid down in earlier Senate
immigration reform bills."
"Even with record level spending on enforcement, enforcement alone is not sufficient to address the challenges
of undocumented migration."
12 It also has significant unintended consequences; according to U.S. Border Patrol
statistics, the Southwest border witnesses close to one death per day.
13 All of these efforts that have
accumulated in the name of security, however, do not necessarily measure border security properly, or make
the border more secure.
14 It is past time for the United States to turn away from costly and haphazard efforts to
secure the border and instead focus on reining in the costs of border enforcement"
"Since 1993, when the current strategy of concentrated border enforcement was first rolled out along the
U.S.-Mexico border, the annual budget of the U.S. Border Patrol has increased more than ten-fold, from $363
million to nearly $4.9 billion (Figure 1)."
"Border security depends on the smart and efficient use of available resources. At the same, border enforcement
cannot and should not be done in isolation. Instead, it must be examined in the larger context of reforms needed
for the entire immigration system"
https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/research/the_cost_of_immigration_enforcement_and_border_security.pdf
"Immigration reform"? Oh yeah, that's been on the table for longer than we have been alive. But, it never seems to get done. My favorite was when Saint Ronnie fixed it by giving millions of people amnesty. That was supposed to take care of the
TB
On 10/23/2023 7:53 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 6:45 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 4:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals.
3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is
secure" - to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call >>>>>>>> it comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there
were problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody
else, and then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House
repubes. I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
Yes. There definitely is a problem with the House repubes.
You should have been a politician.
October average:
137 DL
15 UL
32 Latency
That ain't bad. I learned that a really, really, hugely,
tremendously, everybody said so even the experts, heavy rainfall
takes my dishy offline 'til it passes.
In my experience, local rain itself - no matter how heavy - doesn't
matter much.
That's what I used to say.
I allege that for weather to shut me down, t-storms or dense rain
clouds have to cover a wide expanse of sky. All we need is one sat
to have a connection, and these days, I allegedly have 8-12 sats up
there all over the sky most of the time. Also, all the additional
sats up there now have made my evil pine trees inefficacious as
obstructionists.
I further allege that this supports my previous allegations:
https://starlink.sx/
I think your alleged allegories got ate by alligators.
kmiller wrote:
On 10/23/2023 7:53 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 6:45 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 4:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked.
2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals. >>>>>>>>> 3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is secure" >>>>>>>>> - to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment.
5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and call >>>>>>>>> it comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there were >>>>>>>>> problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody else, and >>>>>>>>> then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House
repubes. I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
Yes. There definitely is a problem with the House repubes.
You should have been a politician.
October average:
137 DL
15 UL
32 Latency
That ain't bad. I learned that a really, really, hugely,
tremendously, everybody said so even the experts, heavy rainfall
takes my dishy offline 'til it passes.
In my experience, local rain itself - no matter how heavy - doesn't
matter much.
That's what I used to say.
Why don't you still say it?
I allege that for weather to shut me down, t-storms or dense rain
clouds have to cover a wide expanse of sky. All we need is one sat to
have a connection, and these days, I allegedly have 8-12 sats up
there all over the sky most of the time. Also, all the additional
sats up there now have made my evil pine trees inefficacious as
obstructionists.
I further allege that this supports my previous allegations:
https://starlink.sx/
I think your alleged allegories got ate by alligators.
When I had Hughesnet (GEO sat), t-storms overhead made no difference as
long as the storms were not to the south.
Same is true of my sat TV. Do
you have a history of believing whatever alligators say? Don't you know
that alligators are inveterate vertebrate liars? Do you have any
affidavits to support your position from any alligators that are not
involved in a plea deal?
On 10/25/2023 5:37 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/23/2023 7:53 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 6:45 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 4:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked. >>>>>>>>>> 2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals. >>>>>>>>>> 3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is
secure" - to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment. >>>>>>>>>> 5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and
call it comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there >>>>>>>>>> were problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody >>>>>>>>>> else, and then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House
repubes. I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw!
Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
Yes. There definitely is a problem with the House repubes.
You should have been a politician.
October average:
137 DL
15 UL
32 Latency
That ain't bad. I learned that a really, really, hugely,
tremendously, everybody said so even the experts, heavy rainfall
takes my dishy offline 'til it passes.
In my experience, local rain itself - no matter how heavy -
doesn't matter much.
That's what I used to say.
Why don't you still say it?
I allege that for weather to shut me down, t-storms or dense rain
clouds have to cover a wide expanse of sky. All we need is one sat
to have a connection, and these days, I allegedly have 8-12 sats
up there all over the sky most of the time. Also, all the
additional sats up there now have made my evil pine trees
inefficacious as obstructionists.
I further allege that this supports my previous allegations:
https://starlink.sx/
I think your alleged allegories got ate by alligators.
When I had Hughesnet (GEO sat), t-storms overhead made no difference
as long as the storms were not to the south.
Oh, suuure! Now the qualifiers come out of hiding. My sat points WNW.
And all is good until it rains hard enough to drown your 'gators.
Same is true of my sat TV. Do you have a history of believing
whatever alligators say? Don't you know that alligators are
inveterate vertebrate liars? Do you have any affidavits to support
your position from any alligators that are not involved in a plea deal?
kmiller wrote:
On 10/25/2023 5:37 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/23/2023 7:53 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 6:45 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 4:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked. >>>>>>>>>>> 2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals. >>>>>>>>>>> 3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is
secure" - to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment. >>>>>>>>>>> 5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and >>>>>>>>>>> call it comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there >>>>>>>>>>> were problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody >>>>>>>>>>> else, and then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House
repubes. I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw! >>>>>>>>>
Yes. There definitely is a problem with the House repubes.
You should have been a politician.
October average:
137 DL
15 UL
32 Latency
That ain't bad. I learned that a really, really, hugely,
tremendously, everybody said so even the experts, heavy rainfall
takes my dishy offline 'til it passes.
In my experience, local rain itself - no matter how heavy - doesn't
matter much.
That's what I used to say.
Why don't you still say it?
I allege that for weather to shut me down, t-storms or dense rain
clouds have to cover a wide expanse of sky. All we need is one sat
to have a connection, and these days, I allegedly have 8-12 sats up
there all over the sky most of the time. Also, all the additional
sats up there now have made my evil pine trees inefficacious as
obstructionists.
I further allege that this supports my previous allegations:
https://starlink.sx/
I think your alleged allegories got ate by alligators.
When I had Hughesnet (GEO sat), t-storms overhead made no difference
as long as the storms were not to the south.
Oh, suuure! Now the qualifiers come out of hiding. My sat points WNW.
Are you sure? My dishy points NNE. Was it an alligator that told you
which way it was pointing?
And all is good until it rains hard enough to drown your 'gators.
Same is true of my sat TV. Do you have a history of believing
whatever alligators say? Don't you know that alligators are
inveterate vertebrate liars? Do you have any affidavits to support
your position from any alligators that are not involved in a plea deal?
On 10/25/2023 7:55 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/25/2023 5:37 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/23/2023 7:53 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 6:45 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/22/2023 4:31 PM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
On 10/20/2023 10:52 AM, bfh wrote:Does that mean you implicitly admit there is a problem?
1. Cause problems by reversing policies that mostly worked. >>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Deny that there are any problems caused by the reversals. >>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Repeatedly provide altfacts - such as "The border is >>>>>>>>>>>> secure" - to support the denial.
4. If inconvenient questions are asked, decline to comment. >>>>>>>>>>>> 5. Request billions to fix the not-problems.
6. Implement policies to reverse the policy reversals and >>>>>>>>>>>> call it comprehensive reform.
7. Finally, when things start to improve, admit that there >>>>>>>>>>>> were problems, but claim that they were caused by somebody >>>>>>>>>>>> else, and then take credit for fixing them.
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/19/us-aid-israel-biden-border-immigration
All he really had to do was send the problem to the House >>>>>>>>>>> repubes. I'm sure they'd get around to fixing it. HawHawHaw! >>>>>>>>>>
Yes. There definitely is a problem with the House repubes.
You should have been a politician.
October average:
137 DL
15 UL
32 Latency
That ain't bad. I learned that a really, really, hugely,
tremendously, everybody said so even the experts, heavy
rainfall takes my dishy offline 'til it passes.
In my experience, local rain itself - no matter how heavy -
doesn't matter much.
That's what I used to say.
Why don't you still say it?
I allege that for weather to shut me down, t-storms or dense
rain clouds have to cover a wide expanse of sky. All we need is
one sat to have a connection, and these days, I allegedly have
8-12 sats up there all over the sky most of the time. Also, all
the additional sats up there now have made my evil pine trees
inefficacious as obstructionists.
I further allege that this supports my previous allegations:
https://starlink.sx/
I think your alleged allegories got ate by alligators.
When I had Hughesnet (GEO sat), t-storms overhead made no
difference as long as the storms were not to the south.
Oh, suuure! Now the qualifiers come out of hiding. My sat points WNW.
Are you sure? My dishy points NNE. Was it an alligator that told you
which way it was pointing?
And all is good until it rains hard enough to drown your 'gators.
Same is true of my sat TV. Do you have a history of believing
whatever alligators say? Don't you know that alligators are
inveterate vertebrate liars? Do you have any affidavits to support
your position from any alligators that are not involved in a plea
deal?
Yes, I'm sure. Obviously, I'm using the satellites up before they can
reach your area which explains your poor performance and misinformation.
Our alligators have been taught that pointing is not nice. Therefore,
to make a point, we have no pointing alligators.
kmiller wrote:
Yes, I'm sure. Obviously, I'm using the satellites up before they can
reach your area which explains your poor performance and misinformation.
Our alligators have been taught that pointing is not nice. Therefore,
to make a point, we have no pointing alligators.
You have my condolences. If an alligator can't point, what good is it? I allege that you should consider implementing comprehensive reform in
your alligator education system.
On 10/26/2023 11:19 AM, bfh wrote:
kmiller wrote:
Yes, I'm sure. Obviously, I'm using the satellites up before they
can reach your area which explains your poor performance and
misinformation.
Ha!
Our alligators have been taught that pointing is not nice.
Therefore, to make a point, we have no pointing alligators.
You have my condolences. If an alligator can't point, what good is
it? I allege that you should consider implementing comprehensive
reform in your alligator education system.
Shouldn't that be re-education?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 94:09:55 |
| Calls: | 6,658 |
| Files: | 12,206 |
| Messages: | 5,334,349 |