• Orange Goon Found Liable For Fraud

    From kmiller@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 26 14:07:35 2023
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on
    Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James'
    civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating
    his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state
    court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization
    of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better
    terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion,
    and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial
    statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in
    Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses.

    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond
    to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of
    several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided
    Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without
    basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years
    since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were
    not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he
    could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/

    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert caprel@21:1/5 to kmiller on Tue Sep 26 18:18:38 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-7, kmiller wrote:
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on
    Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James'
    civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating
    his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization
    of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion,
    and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial
    statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in
    Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses.

    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond
    to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of
    several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided
    Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without
    basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were
    not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he
    could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/

    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...

    Trump organisation is dead; the IRS is now in charge

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to robert caprel on Tue Sep 26 19:04:42 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 6:18:40 PM UTC-7, robert caprel wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-7, kmiller wrote:
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James'
    civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization
    of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion,
    and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial
    statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses.

    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond
    to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were
    not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/

    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...
    Trump organisation is dead; the IRS is now in charge

    Maybe, but if it is, the IRS is not involved. This is all New York State's baby.

    It's likely to be many years before we see the end result of this lawsuit.

    "Experts are calling it the "corporate death penalty." And what happens next is unchartered territory.

    In a stunning decision on Tuesday, a Manhattan judge found that Donald Trump committed widespread, longstanding and ongoing fraud at the Trump Organization, and ordered what experts in New York financial crimes say amounts to the dissolution of his
    company.

    The penalty, awarded on behalf of New York attorney general Letitia James, is so extreme, that Trump may fight James and the judge for years before anything actually happens.

    And the penalty is so rare, that the only previous time it's been attempted on such a grand scale – when James sought the corporate death penalty in her three-year-old, ongoing fraud lawsuit against the NRA – has failed."

    https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-fraud-ruling-corporate-death-penalty-for-his-empire-experts-2023-9

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert caprel@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Wed Sep 27 08:51:39 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:04:44 PM UTC-7, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 6:18:40 PM UTC-7, robert caprel wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-7, kmiller wrote:
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James' civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion, and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses.

    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/

    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...
    Trump organisation is dead; the IRS is now in charge
    Maybe, but if it is, the IRS is not involved. This is all New York State's baby.

    It's likely to be many years before we see the end result of this lawsuit.

    "Experts are calling it the "corporate death penalty." And what happens next is unchartered territory.

    In a stunning decision on Tuesday, a Manhattan judge found that Donald Trump committed widespread, longstanding and ongoing fraud at the Trump Organization, and ordered what experts in New York financial crimes say amounts to the dissolution of his
    company.

    The penalty, awarded on behalf of New York attorney general Letitia James, is so extreme, that Trump may fight James and the judge for years before anything actually happens.

    And the penalty is so rare, that the only previous time it's been attempted on such a grand scale – when James sought the corporate death penalty in her three-year-old, ongoing fraud lawsuit against the NRA – has failed."

    https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-fraud-ruling-corporate-death-penalty-for-his-empire-experts-2023-9

    TB

    Not so fast this ruling is what the IRS needed to move in with impunity to freeze assets to protect its interest and hold same until all appeals are exhausted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Wed Sep 27 11:09:23 2023
    On 9/26/2023 9:04 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    The penalty, awarded on behalf of New York attorney general Letitia James, is so extreme, that Trump may fight James and the judge for years before anything actually happens.

    And the penalty is so rare, that the only previous time it's been attempted on such a grand scale – when James sought the corporate death penalty in her three-year-old, ongoing fraud lawsuit against the NRA – has failed."

    https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-fraud-ruling-corporate-death-penalty-for-his-empire-experts-2023-9

    This ridiculous case goes back to James auditioning for the job by
    promising to get Trump. This case and the NRA case have one thing in
    common. They are both being done for political reasons. The NRA case
    did actually have charges of theft and misconduct causing harm at least.
    However the case was properly redirected by the judge who said:

    "Allegations of NRA officials misspending on personal trips, no-show
    contracts and other questionable expenditures can be addressed by other remedies, such as fines and remuneration, and do not warrant the
    “corporate death penalty” that Attorney General Letitia James had sought."

    She was not interested in rectifying the alleged misconduct, instead her
    goal was breaking the NRA though the courts on the corporate level, a
    step even further than many of the other frivolous suits brought with
    the intent of burying the NRA in legal bills.

    The Trump case is similar in motivation. NEVER has there been a
    prosecution of this kind, especially in a civil matter. The judges
    ruling is only 35 pages and is a telling read. It mostly has to do with
    papers filled out in order to attain bank loans and even whether or not
    the court can hear these type of arguments. BTW, the judge is not shy
    in using colorful adjectives to explain his characterization of
    defendants arguments. They clearly show a lack of impartiality IMO.

    They are arguing about valuations in the paperwork that the prosecution
    says are criminally fraudulent. Yet, no bank in history has ever given
    a loan without doing their do diligence of the value of an applicants
    assets. Trump is 100% correct when he said in his deposition it is a meaningless document. It is procedure and a starting point in attaining
    a loan.

    In writing his opinion, the one thing the judge got right was at the
    bottom of page 7 where he acknowledges the key fact in this case that
    even if the numbers were wrong, nobody was harmed:

    "Defendants correctly assert that the record is devoid of any evidence
    of default, breach, late payment, or any complaint of harm and argue
    that as none of the recipients of the subject ever lodged a complaint
    with OAG or otherwise claimed damages, disgorgement of profits would be inappropriate. NYSCEF Doc. No. 835 at 40."

    What really bothers me is the willingness of otherwise good people to
    accept persecution like this in our judicial system for political
    reasons. I would hope my side of things never acts like this, even in retaliation. It is not equal treatment under the law, and is obviously intended to harm the front runner of a political opposing party. It's a fucking joke and very harmful to our nation!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Howell@21:1/5 to kmiller on Wed Sep 27 10:01:46 2023
    kmiller wrote:
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on
    Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James'
    civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating
    his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state
    court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization
    of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion,
    and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial
    statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in
    Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses.

    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond
    to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of
    several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided
    Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without
    basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years
    since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were
    not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he
    could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/


    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...
    Don't forget The judge also ordered that certain Trump business
    certificates be canceled, and that a receiver be appointed to manage the dissolution of the LLCs. That reportedly means that Trump could lose
    control of some of his properties in the state, including office
    buildings, a golf club and even the Trump Tower.

    Oh by the way Engoron also fined Trump’s lawyers $7,500 each for
    repeating arguments he had previously dismissed.

    The Emperor is naked and fat and a total shit!

    --
    Frank Howell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to sticks on Wed Sep 27 13:28:48 2023
    On 9/27/2023 11:09 AM, sticks wrote:
    On 9/26/2023 9:04 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    The penalty, awarded on behalf of New York attorney general Letitia
    James, is so extreme, that Trump may fight James and the judge for
    years before anything actually happens.

    And the penalty is so rare, that the only previous time it's been
    attempted on such a grand scale – when James sought the corporate
    death penalty in her three-year-old, ongoing fraud lawsuit against the
    NRA – has failed."

    https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-fraud-ruling-corporate-death-penalty-for-his-empire-experts-2023-9

    This ridiculous case goes back to James auditioning for the job by
    promising to get Trump.  This case and the NRA case have one thing in common.  They are both being done for political reasons.  The NRA case
    did actually have charges of theft and misconduct causing harm at least.
     However the case was properly redirected by the judge who said:

    "Allegations of NRA officials misspending on personal trips, no-show contracts and other questionable expenditures can be addressed by other remedies, such as fines and remuneration, and do not warrant the
    “corporate death penalty” that Attorney General Letitia James had sought."

    She was not interested in rectifying the alleged misconduct, instead her
    goal was breaking the NRA though the courts on the corporate level, a
    step even further than many of the other frivolous suits brought with
    the intent of burying the NRA in legal bills.

    The Trump case is similar in motivation.  NEVER has there been a
    prosecution of this kind, especially in a civil matter.  The judges
    ruling is only 35 pages and is a telling read.  It mostly has to do with papers filled out in order to attain bank loans and even whether or not
    the court can hear these type of arguments.  BTW, the judge is not shy
    in using colorful adjectives to explain his characterization of
    defendants arguments.  They clearly show a lack of impartiality IMO.

    They are arguing about valuations in the paperwork that the prosecution
    says are criminally fraudulent.  Yet, no bank in history has ever given
    a loan without doing their do diligence of the value of an applicants assets.  Trump is 100% correct when he said in his deposition it is a meaningless document.  It is procedure and a starting point in attaining
    a loan.

    In writing his opinion, the one thing the judge got right was at the
    bottom of page 7 where he acknowledges the key fact in this case that
    even if the numbers were wrong, nobody was harmed:

    "Defendants correctly assert that the record is devoid of any evidence
    of default, breach, late payment, or any complaint of harm and argue
    that as none of the recipients of the subject ever lodged a complaint
    with OAG or otherwise claimed damages, disgorgement of profits would be inappropriate. NYSCEF Doc. No. 835 at 40."

    What really bothers me is the willingness of otherwise good people to
    accept persecution like this in our judicial system for political
    reasons.  I would hope my side of things never acts like this, even in retaliation.  It is not equal treatment under the law, and is obviously intended to harm the front runner of a political opposing party.  It's a fucking joke and very harmful to our nation!

    I will add probably the most egregious action of the judge in the case
    is his granting of *summary judgement* to the Plaintiffs. In most cases
    if a judge decides for a variety of reasons there is no genuine dispute
    as to any material fact, he has the option of granting summary
    judgement, though he might still prefer to have a trial. In cases where
    he rules on matters of law, summary judgement is more clear cut. This
    entire case is a dispute of opinions of value, and the importance of
    said opinions. Everything is in dispute. To make matters worse, the
    judge then sanctioned the Presidents lawyers for doing their job in
    presenting a defense for their client. Nullifying their work, and
    attempting to muzzle them in the future.

    I completely understand the democrats hate trump and his policies, but
    if anyone thinks it is OK to live with a system where one man can decide
    to not allow a defendant a trial of his peers, destroy a billion dollar company, and possibly put thousands of people out of work without the
    chance of presenting evidence and refuting prosecution evidence and
    witnesses, you should move to Venezuela.

    Of course this will be appealed, and Trump will prevail. But the damage
    will be done and that is what this is all about. A dangerous game the
    liberals now play.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to sticks on Wed Sep 27 16:35:44 2023
    sticks wrote:
    On 9/27/2023 11:09 AM, sticks wrote:
    On 9/26/2023 9:04 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    The penalty, awarded on behalf of New York attorney general Letitia
    James, is so extreme, that Trump may fight James and the judge for
    years before anything actually happens.

    And the penalty is so rare, that the only previous time it's been
    attempted on such a grand scale – when James sought the corporate >>> death penalty in her three-year-old, ongoing fraud lawsuit against
    the NRA – has failed."

    https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-fraud-ruling-corporate-death-penalty-for-his-empire-experts-2023-9


    This ridiculous case goes back to James auditioning for the job by
    promising to get Trump.  This case and the NRA case have one thing
    in common.  They are both being done for political reasons.  The
    NRA case did actually have charges of theft and misconduct causing
    harm at least.  Â However the case was properly redirected by the
    judge who said:

    "Allegations of NRA officials misspending on personal trips, no-show
    contracts and other questionable expenditures can be addressed by
    other remedies, such as fines and remuneration, and do not warrant
    the “corporate death penalty” that Attorney General Letitia
    James had sought."

    She was not interested in rectifying the alleged misconduct, instead
    her goal was breaking the NRA though the courts on the corporate
    level, a step even further than many of the other frivolous suits
    brought with the intent of burying the NRA in legal bills.

    The Trump case is similar in motivation.  NEVER has there been a
    prosecution of this kind, especially in a civil matter.  The judges
    ruling is only 35 pages and is a telling read.  It mostly has to do
    with papers filled out in order to attain bank loans and even
    whether or not the court can hear these type of arguments.  BTW,
    the judge is not shy in using colorful adjectives to explain his
    characterization of defendants arguments.  They clearly show a lack
    of impartiality IMO.

    They are arguing about valuations in the paperwork that the
    prosecution says are criminally fraudulent.  Yet, no bank in
    history has ever given a loan without doing their do diligence of
    the value of an applicants assets.  Trump is 100% correct when he
    said in his deposition it is a meaningless document.  It is
    procedure and a starting point in attaining a loan.

    In writing his opinion, the one thing the judge got right was at the
    bottom of page 7 where he acknowledges the key fact in this case
    that even if the numbers were wrong, nobody was harmed:

    "Defendants correctly assert that the record is devoid of any
    evidence of default, breach, late payment, or any complaint of harm
    and argue that as none of the recipients of the subject ever lodged
    a complaint with OAG or otherwise claimed damages, disgorgement of
    profits would be inappropriate. NYSCEF Doc. No. 835 at 40."

    What really bothers me is the willingness of otherwise good people
    to accept persecution like this in our judicial system for political
    reasons.  I would hope my side of things never acts like this, even
    in retaliation.  It is not equal treatment under the law, and is
    obviously intended to harm the front runner of a political opposing
    party.  It's a fucking joke and very harmful to our nation!

    I will add probably the most egregious action of the judge in the case
    is his granting of *summary judgement* to the Plaintiffs.  In most
    cases if a judge decides for a variety of reasons there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, he has the option of granting summary judgement, though he might still prefer to have a trial.  In cases
    where he rules on matters of law, summary judgement is more clear
    cut.  This entire case is a dispute of opinions of value, and the
    importance of said opinions.  Everything is in dispute.  To make
    matters worse, the judge then sanctioned the Presidents lawyers for
    doing their job in presenting a defense for their client.  Nullifying
    their work, and attempting to muzzle them in the future.

    I completely understand the democrats hate trump and his policies, but
    if anyone thinks it is OK to live with a system where one man can
    decide to not allow a defendant a trial of his peers, destroy a
    billion dollar company, and possibly put thousands of people out of
    work without the chance of presenting evidence and refuting
    prosecution evidence and witnesses, you should move to Venezuela.

    Of course this will be appealed, and Trump will prevail.  But the
    damage will be done and that is what this is all about.  A dangerous
    game the liberals now play.

    The First Rule of Assault Spaghetti Warfare:
    Keep throwing it. Spaghetti is cheap.

    Even if it doesn't stick - which most of it doesn't - it'll still
    leave a stain.

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to bfh on Wed Sep 27 16:26:46 2023
    On 9/27/2023 3:35 PM, bfh wrote:
    sticks wrote:
    On 9/27/2023 11:09 AM, sticks wrote:
    On 9/26/2023 9:04 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    The penalty, awarded on behalf of New York attorney general Letitia
    James, is so extreme, that Trump may fight James and the judge for
    years before anything actually happens.

    And the penalty is so rare, that the only previous time it's been
    attempted on such a grand scale – when James sought the corporate >>>> death penalty in her three-year-old, ongoing fraud lawsuit against
    the NRA – has failed."

    https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-fraud-ruling-corporate-death-penalty-for-his-empire-experts-2023-9

    This ridiculous case goes back to James auditioning for the job by
    promising to get Trump.  This case and the NRA case have one thing
    in common.  They are both being done for political reasons.  The
    NRA case did actually have charges of theft and misconduct causing
    harm at least.  Â However the case was properly redirected by the
    judge who said:

    "Allegations of NRA officials misspending on personal trips, no-show
    contracts and other questionable expenditures can be addressed by
    other remedies, such as fines and remuneration, and do not warrant
    the “corporate death penalty” that Attorney General Letitia James
    had sought."

    She was not interested in rectifying the alleged misconduct, instead
    her goal was breaking the NRA though the courts on the corporate
    level, a step even further than many of the other frivolous suits
    brought with the intent of burying the NRA in legal bills.

    The Trump case is similar in motivation.  NEVER has there been a
    prosecution of this kind, especially in a civil matter.  The judges
    ruling is only 35 pages and is a telling read.  It mostly has to do
    with papers filled out in order to attain bank loans and even whether
    or not the court can hear these type of arguments.  BTW, the judge
    is not shy in using colorful adjectives to explain his
    characterization of defendants arguments.  They clearly show a lack
    of impartiality IMO.

    They are arguing about valuations in the paperwork that the
    prosecution says are criminally fraudulent.  Yet, no bank in history
    has ever given a loan without doing their do diligence of the value
    of an applicants assets.  Trump is 100% correct when he said in his
    deposition it is a meaningless document.  It is procedure and a
    starting point in attaining a loan.

    In writing his opinion, the one thing the judge got right was at the
    bottom of page 7 where he acknowledges the key fact in this case that
    even if the numbers were wrong, nobody was harmed:

    "Defendants correctly assert that the record is devoid of any
    evidence of default, breach, late payment, or any complaint of harm
    and argue that as none of the recipients of the subject ever lodged a
    complaint with OAG or otherwise claimed damages, disgorgement of
    profits would be inappropriate. NYSCEF Doc. No. 835 at 40."

    What really bothers me is the willingness of otherwise good people to
    accept persecution like this in our judicial system for political
    reasons.  I would hope my side of things never acts like this, even
    in retaliation.  It is not equal treatment under the law, and is
    obviously intended to harm the front runner of a political opposing
    party.  It's a fucking joke and very harmful to our nation!

    I will add probably the most egregious action of the judge in the case
    is his granting of *summary judgement* to the Plaintiffs.  In most
    cases if a judge decides for a variety of reasons there is no genuine
    dispute as to any material fact, he has the option of granting summary
    judgement, though he might still prefer to have a trial.  In cases
    where he rules on matters of law, summary judgement is more clear
    cut.  This entire case is a dispute of opinions of value, and the
    importance of said opinions.  Everything is in dispute.  To make
    matters worse, the judge then sanctioned the Presidents lawyers for
    doing their job in presenting a defense for their client.  Nullifying
    their work, and attempting to muzzle them in the future.

    I completely understand the democrats hate trump and his policies, but
    if anyone thinks it is OK to live with a system where one man can
    decide to not allow a defendant a trial of his peers, destroy a
    billion dollar company, and possibly put thousands of people out of
    work without the chance of presenting evidence and refuting
    prosecution evidence and witnesses, you should move to Venezuela.

    Of course this will be appealed, and Trump will prevail.  But the
    damage will be done and that is what this is all about.  A dangerous
    game the liberals now play.

    The First Rule of Assault Spaghetti Warfare:
    Keep throwing it. Spaghetti is cheap.

    Even if it doesn't stick - which most of it doesn't - it'll still leave
    a stain.

    Spaghetti is very cheap when it is the government throwing it. They
    don't care what it costs. They're not paying, the taxing base is. They
    just go get more.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to TechnoBoob on Wed Sep 27 17:48:27 2023
    On 9/27/2023 5:34 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-7, kmiller wrote:
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on
    Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James'
    civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating
    his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state
    court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization
    of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better
    terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion,
    and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial
    statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included
    Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in
    Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses.

    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond
    to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of
    several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided
    Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without
    basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years
    since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were
    not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he
    could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/

    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...

    The Saudi connection to all of this is fun. #45 has mentioned his ability to sell to the
    Saudi's, at inflated prices, in court, more than once.

    "Shortly after being indicted on charges of paying hush money to an adult-film actress, Donald Trump sat for a deposition in his separate financial fraud trial and bragged about being able to sell his properties at an inflated rate to Saudi Arabian
    interests.

    A New York judge noted the boasts in a major ruling on Tuesday that found Trump and his company had committed fraud for years. The judge further suggested that such prices might have had more to do with buying influence than buying properties — a
    relevant point given Trump’s controversial post-presidency business arrangements with the Saudis.

    In his ruling, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron pointed to what he viewed as a particularly strained argument from Trump: that the property values Trump inflated to increase his perceived net worth could be correct because someone might
    pay them.

    And Trump repeatedly pointed to a particular someone: the Saudis.

    “He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he could find a ‘buyer from Saudi Arabia’ to pay any price he suggests,” Engoron wrote.

    Then, in a conspicuously inserted footnote, Engoron added: “This statement may suggest influence buying more than savvy investing.”

    But it wasn’t the only time Trump talked recently about being able to take Saudi money in controversial ways. Trump keeps talking about this, even after controversy erupted over his son-in-law Jared Kushner’s acceptance of $2 billion in financing
    from the Saudi Public Investment Fund shortly after Trump left office, even after Trump went into business with the Saudis, even after the GOP criticized the Bidens for purportedly being compromised by foreign money, and even after Trump criticized
    politicians for taking foreign money in the past, including from Saudi Arabia."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/09/27/trump-saudis-influence-buying/

    TB

    Fucking hilarious. The judges comment again shows lack of impartiality.
    I'll give you a hint. Trump is a businessman. The Saudis have lots
    of money. The Saudis like his stuff and are willing to pay for it.
    They get nothing in American policy making in return for it. They just
    get to make more money. Though I guess the Abraham accords must also be somehow a bad thing to you libs.

    Yet, the Bidens have no business expertise. Take in millions from
    corrupt foreign governments, usually governments who are not considered
    our allies. Give said foreign entities access to our politicians and
    get favorable policy. Lie about everything, all the time, and it means
    nothing to you phony shitheads. More of this made up truth of yours.
    "But, but, but, I provided a source!"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to kmiller on Wed Sep 27 15:34:44 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-7, kmiller wrote:
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on
    Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James'
    civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating
    his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization
    of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion,
    and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial
    statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in
    Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses.

    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond
    to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of
    several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided
    Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without
    basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were
    not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he
    could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/

    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...

    The Saudi connection to all of this is fun. #45 has mentioned his ability to sell to the
    Saudi's, at inflated prices, in court, more than once.

    "Shortly after being indicted on charges of paying hush money to an adult-film actress, Donald Trump sat for a deposition in his separate financial fraud trial and bragged about being able to sell his properties at an inflated rate to Saudi Arabian
    interests.

    A New York judge noted the boasts in a major ruling on Tuesday that found Trump and his company had committed fraud for years. The judge further suggested that such prices might have had more to do with buying influence than buying properties — a
    relevant point given Trump’s controversial post-presidency business arrangements with the Saudis.

    In his ruling, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron pointed to what he viewed as a particularly strained argument from Trump: that the property values Trump inflated to increase his perceived net worth could be correct because someone might pay
    them.

    And Trump repeatedly pointed to a particular someone: the Saudis.

    “He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he could find a ‘buyer from Saudi Arabia’ to pay any price he suggests,” Engoron wrote.

    Then, in a conspicuously inserted footnote, Engoron added: “This statement may suggest influence buying more than savvy investing.”

    But it wasn’t the only time Trump talked recently about being able to take Saudi money in controversial ways. Trump keeps talking about this, even after controversy erupted over his son-in-law Jared Kushner’s acceptance of $2 billion in financing
    from the Saudi Public Investment Fund shortly after Trump left office, even after Trump went into business with the Saudis, even after the GOP criticized the Bidens for purportedly being compromised by foreign money, and even after Trump criticized
    politicians for taking foreign money in the past, including from Saudi Arabia."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/09/27/trump-saudis-influence-buying/

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert caprel@21:1/5 to sticks on Wed Sep 27 17:02:24 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:48:30 PM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 9/27/2023 5:34 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-7, kmiller wrote:
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on
    Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James'
    civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating >> his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state >> court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization >> of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better >> terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion,
    and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial
    statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included >> Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in
    Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses. >>
    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond
    to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of
    several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided
    Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without
    basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years >> since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were
    not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he
    could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/

    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...

    The Saudi connection to all of this is fun. #45 has mentioned his ability to sell to the
    Saudi's, at inflated prices, in court, more than once.

    "Shortly after being indicted on charges of paying hush money to an adult-film actress, Donald Trump sat for a deposition in his separate financial fraud trial and bragged about being able to sell his properties at an inflated rate to Saudi Arabian
    interests.

    A New York judge noted the boasts in a major ruling on Tuesday that found Trump and his company had committed fraud for years. The judge further suggested that such prices might have had more to do with buying influence than buying properties — a
    relevant point given Trump’s controversial post-presidency business arrangements with the Saudis.

    In his ruling, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron pointed to what he viewed as a particularly strained argument from Trump: that the property values Trump inflated to increase his perceived net worth could be correct because someone might
    pay them.

    And Trump repeatedly pointed to a particular someone: the Saudis.

    “He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he could find a ‘buyer from Saudi Arabia’ to pay any price he suggests,” Engoron wrote.

    Then, in a conspicuously inserted footnote, Engoron added: “This statement may suggest influence buying more than savvy investing.”

    But it wasn’t the only time Trump talked recently about being able to take Saudi money in controversial ways. Trump keeps talking about this, even after controversy erupted over his son-in-law Jared Kushner’s acceptance of $2 billion in financing
    from the Saudi Public Investment Fund shortly after Trump left office, even after Trump went into business with the Saudis, even after the GOP criticized the Bidens for purportedly being compromised by foreign money, and even after Trump criticized
    politicians for taking foreign money in the past, including from Saudi Arabia."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/09/27/trump-saudis-influence-buying/

    TB
    Fucking hilarious. The judges comment again shows lack of impartiality.
    I'll give you a hint. Trump is a businessman. The Saudis have lots
    of money. The Saudis like his stuff and are willing to pay for it.
    They get nothing in American policy making in return for it. They just
    get to make more money. Though I guess the Abraham accords must also be somehow a bad thing to you libs.

    Yet, the Bidens have no business expertise. Take in millions from
    corrupt foreign governments, usually governments who are not considered
    our allies. Give said foreign entities access to our politicians and
    get favorable policy. Lie about everything, all the time, and it means nothing to you phony shitheads. More of this made up truth of yours.
    "But, but, but, I provided a source!"

    Give you another hint, Trump is a serial shyster and con man same as Bernie Madoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to kmiller on Wed Sep 27 19:13:17 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 6:49:49 PM UTC-7, kmiller wrote:
    On 9/27/2023 3:34 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-7, kmiller wrote:
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on
    Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James'
    civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating >> his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state >> court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization >> of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better >> terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion,
    and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial
    statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included >> Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in
    Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses. >>
    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond
    to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of
    several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided
    Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without
    basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years >> since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were
    not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he
    could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/

    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...

    The Saudi connection to all of this is fun. #45 has mentioned his ability to sell to the
    Saudi's, at inflated prices, in court, more than once.

    "Shortly after being indicted on charges of paying hush money to an adult-film actress, Donald Trump sat for a deposition in his separate financial fraud trial and bragged about being able to sell his properties at an inflated rate to Saudi Arabian
    interests.

    A New York judge noted the boasts in a major ruling on Tuesday that found Trump and his company had committed fraud for years. The judge further suggested that such prices might have had more to do with buying influence than buying properties — a
    relevant point given Trump’s controversial post-presidency business arrangements with the Saudis.

    In his ruling, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron pointed to what he viewed as a particularly strained argument from Trump: that the property values Trump inflated to increase his perceived net worth could be correct because someone might
    pay them.

    And Trump repeatedly pointed to a particular someone: the Saudis.

    “He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he could find a ‘buyer from Saudi Arabia’ to pay any price he suggests,” Engoron wrote.

    Then, in a conspicuously inserted footnote, Engoron added: “This statement may suggest influence buying more than savvy investing.”

    But it wasn’t the only time Trump talked recently about being able to take Saudi money in controversial ways. Trump keeps talking about this, even after controversy erupted over his son-in-law Jared Kushner’s acceptance of $2 billion in financing
    from the Saudi Public Investment Fund shortly after Trump left office, even after Trump went into business with the Saudis, even after the GOP criticized the Bidens for purportedly being compromised by foreign money, and even after Trump criticized
    politicians for taking foreign money in the past, including from Saudi Arabia."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/09/27/trump-saudis-influence-buying/

    TB
    Yeah. An there's this:

    The judge was unsparing in his decision, criticizing the Trumps’ defense arguments.

    “Exacerbating defendants’ obstreperous conduct is their continued reliance on bogus arguments, in papers and oral argument,” Engoron wrote.

    The state supreme court judge likened the Trumps’ legal defense of his fraudulent financial statements to a Chico Marx line in the comedy “Duck Soup”: “Well, who ya gonna believe, me or your own eyes?”

    James has alleged that Trump, three of his children, his companies and
    his business executives defrauded lenders, insurers and other entities.
    (An appeals court dismissed Trump’s eldest daughter, Ivanka, as a co-defendant from the case in June.)

    In the lawsuit, James claims that Trump reaped a “substantial” financial benefit by putting forward faulty information in his financial
    statements, including $150 million in the form of favorable interest
    rates he obtained from the banks that the attorney general said his team misled.

    In the order, the judge rejected Trump’s deposition testimony in which
    the former president said that the financial statements were not
    fraudulent because they contained disclaimers. Trump said the statements contained a “worthless clause” in them warning lenders and others that they shouldn’t be relied on.

    Tuesday, the judge said that “the defendants’ reliance on these ‘worthless’ disclaimers is worthless.”

    https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/26/politics/trump-organization-business-fraud/index.html

    But, hey! It's a judge saying it. Who you gonna belive? HawHawHaw!

    Spaghetti! HqwHawHaw! Duck soup! HawHawHaw! You guys really hate that
    you're finally getting to see what we been saying for a long time - he's
    a lying, cheating, scumbag. He's always been a lying, cheating scumbag.
    One of these days he'll be a broke, lying, cheating, convicted scumbag.

    Then, of course, you'll claim that you always knew it! HawHawHaw!

    I doubt it. It's more likely that none of that will affect the cult and the magaloons will still be sending money to their orange Buddha. Ain't you heard? "It's all political." Like all liars everywhere they automatically assume everyone is a
    lying cheating scum bag. The difference is that #45 it *their* scumbag. After all, it's all for a good cause. The clock isn't going to turn itself back to the past by itself.

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kmiller@21:1/5 to Technobarbarian on Wed Sep 27 18:49:40 2023
    On 9/27/2023 3:34 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 2:07:46 PM UTC-7, kmiller wrote:
    Donald Trump and his family business were found liable for fraud on
    Tuesday by a New York judge in state Attorney General Letitia James'
    civil lawsuit accusing the former U.S. president of illegally inflating
    his assets and net worth.

    The decision was issued by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state
    court in Manhattan.

    James sued Trump in Sept. 2022, accusing him and the Trump Organization
    of lying for a decade about asset values and his net worth to get better
    terms on bank loans and insurance.

    She has said Trump inflated his net worth by as much as $2.23 billion,
    and by one measure as much as $3.6 billion, on annual financial
    statements given to banks and insurers.

    The attorney general has said assets whose values were inflated included
    Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, his penthouse apartment in
    Manhattan's Trump Tower, and various office buildings and golf courses.

    Lawyers for Trump and the other defendants did not immediately respond
    to requests for comment.

    Engoron said James had established liability for false valuations of
    several properties, including Mar-a-Lago and the penthouse, and chided
    Trump for offering defenses in a deposition that were "wholly without
    basis in law or fact."

    "He claims that if the values of the property have gone up in the years
    since the (financial statements) were submitted, then the numbers were
    not inflated at that time," Engoron wrote.

    "He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he
    could find a 'buyer from Saudi Arabia' to pay any price he suggests."

    A trial is scheduled for Oct. 2, and could last well into December.

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-finds-trump-liable-fraud-new-york-civil-case-2023-09-26/

    Lying, cheating scumbag. But, you knew that...

    The Saudi connection to all of this is fun. #45 has mentioned his ability to sell to the
    Saudi's, at inflated prices, in court, more than once.

    "Shortly after being indicted on charges of paying hush money to an adult-film actress, Donald Trump sat for a deposition in his separate financial fraud trial and bragged about being able to sell his properties at an inflated rate to Saudi Arabian
    interests.

    A New York judge noted the boasts in a major ruling on Tuesday that found Trump and his company had committed fraud for years. The judge further suggested that such prices might have had more to do with buying influence than buying properties — a
    relevant point given Trump’s controversial post-presidency business arrangements with the Saudis.

    In his ruling, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron pointed to what he viewed as a particularly strained argument from Trump: that the property values Trump inflated to increase his perceived net worth could be correct because someone might
    pay them.

    And Trump repeatedly pointed to a particular someone: the Saudis.

    “He also seems to imply that the numbers cannot be inflated because he could find a ‘buyer from Saudi Arabia’ to pay any price he suggests,” Engoron wrote.

    Then, in a conspicuously inserted footnote, Engoron added: “This statement may suggest influence buying more than savvy investing.”

    But it wasn’t the only time Trump talked recently about being able to take Saudi money in controversial ways. Trump keeps talking about this, even after controversy erupted over his son-in-law Jared Kushner’s acceptance of $2 billion in financing
    from the Saudi Public Investment Fund shortly after Trump left office, even after Trump went into business with the Saudis, even after the GOP criticized the Bidens for purportedly being compromised by foreign money, and even after Trump criticized
    politicians for taking foreign money in the past, including from Saudi Arabia."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/09/27/trump-saudis-influence-buying/

    TB

    Yeah. An there's this:

    The judge was unsparing in his decision, criticizing the Trumps’ defense arguments.

    “Exacerbating defendants’ obstreperous conduct is their continued
    reliance on bogus arguments, in papers and oral argument,” Engoron wrote.

    The state supreme court judge likened the Trumps’ legal defense of his fraudulent financial statements to a Chico Marx line in the comedy “Duck Soup”: “Well, who ya gonna believe, me or your own eyes?”

    James has alleged that Trump, three of his children, his companies and
    his business executives defrauded lenders, insurers and other entities.
    (An appeals court dismissed Trump’s eldest daughter, Ivanka, as a co-defendant from the case in June.)

    In the lawsuit, James claims that Trump reaped a “substantial” financial benefit by putting forward faulty information in his financial
    statements, including $150 million in the form of favorable interest
    rates he obtained from the banks that the attorney general said his team misled.

    In the order, the judge rejected Trump’s deposition testimony in which
    the former president said that the financial statements were not
    fraudulent because they contained disclaimers. Trump said the statements contained a “worthless clause” in them warning lenders and others that
    they shouldn’t be relied on.

    Tuesday, the judge said that “the defendants’ reliance on these ‘worthless’ disclaimers is worthless.”

    https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/26/politics/trump-organization-business-fraud/index.html

    But, hey! It's a judge saying it. Who you gonna belive? HawHawHaw!

    Spaghetti! HqwHawHaw! Duck soup! HawHawHaw! You guys really hate that
    you're finally getting to see what we been saying for a long time - he's
    a lying, cheating, scumbag. He's always been a lying, cheating scumbag.
    One of these days he'll be a broke, lying, cheating, convicted scumbag.

    Then, of course, you'll claim that you always knew it! HawHawHaw!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)