• Evangelicals Are Now Rejecting 'Liberal' Teachings of Christ

    From Technobarbarian@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 10 12:04:58 2023
    "In his NPR interview, Moore suggested that Trump had transformed the political landscape in the U.S. to the point where some Christian conservatives are openly denouncing a central doctrine of their religion as being too "weak" and "liberal" for their
    liking.

    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in their preaching—'turn the other cheek'—[and] to have someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get those liberal talking points?'"
    Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then we'
    re in a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706

    That's pretty much their attitude about the constitution. And the government, and the law, and many other things.

    TB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to TechnoBoob on Fri Aug 11 19:06:28 2023
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "In his NPR interview, Moore suggested that Trump had transformed the political landscape in the U.S. to the point where some Christian conservatives are openly denouncing a central doctrine of their religion as being too "weak" and "liberal" for their
    liking.

    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in their preaching—'turn the other cheek'—[and] to have someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get those liberal talking points?'"
    Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then
    we're in a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706

    That's pretty much their attitude about the constitution. And the government, and the law, and many other things.


    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to
    hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an NPR propaganda
    interview reported on the Democrat party mouthpiece newsweek magazine
    website quoting a disgraced Never-Trumper who no one gives two shits
    about what he says anymore. Right...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Van Pelt@21:1/5 to wolverine01@charter.net on Sat Aug 12 04:05:30 2023
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3@dont-email.me>,
    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in
    their preaching—'turn the other cheek'—[and] to have someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get those
    liberal talking points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are
    seen as subversive to us, then we're in a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706

    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to
    hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an NPR propaganda >interview reported on the Democrat party mouthpiece newsweek magazine
    website quoting a disgraced Never-Trumper who no one gives two shits
    about what he says anymore. Right...

    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of this tale of
    alleged Christians allegedly directly denouncing red-letter
    statements of Jesus straight from their King James (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he first impinged
    on my awareness back in the 1980s, and never voted for the
    SOB (What can I say, I lived in Commiefornia at the time,
    and my vote was a meaningless gesture; I chose to make it
    a "Plague on both your parties" gesture.) I find it very
    telling that in this story that the only alleged Christians
    who are putting their politics above Jesus are on the right.
    No one on the left has ever, ever, EVER done, said, or believed
    ANYTHING contrary to one bit of Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan political
    screed than factual.

    --
    Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
    mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
    KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kmiller@21:1/5 to Mike Van Pelt on Sat Aug 12 19:01:55 2023
    On 8/11/2023 9:05 PM, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3@dont-email.me>,
    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in
    their preaching—'turn the other cheek'—[and] to have someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get those
    liberal talking points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are
    seen as subversive to us, then we're in a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706

    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to
    hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an NPR propaganda
    interview reported on the Democrat party mouthpiece newsweek magazine
    website quoting a disgraced Never-Trumper who no one gives two shits
    about what he says anymore. Right...

    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of this tale of
    alleged Christians allegedly directly denouncing red-letter
    statements of Jesus straight from their King James (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he first impinged
    on my awareness back in the 1980s, and never voted for the
    SOB (What can I say, I lived in Commiefornia at the time,
    and my vote was a meaningless gesture; I chose to make it
    a "Plague on both your parties" gesture.) I find it very
    telling that in this story that the only alleged Christians
    who are putting their politics above Jesus are on the right.
    No one on the left has ever, ever, EVER done, said, or believed
    ANYTHING contrary to one bit of Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan political
    screed than factual.


    Let's join the party of the whatabouts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Lampson@21:1/5 to Mike Van Pelt on Sat Aug 12 19:51:35 2023
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:05:36 PM UTC-7, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3...@dont-email.me>,
    sticks <wolve...@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in
    their preaching—'turn the other cheek'—[and] to have someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get those
    liberal talking points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are
    seen as subversive to us, then we're in a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706

    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to >hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an NPR propaganda >interview reported on the Democrat party mouthpiece newsweek magazine >website quoting a disgraced Never-Trumper who no one gives two shits
    about what he says anymore. Right...
    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of this tale of
    alleged Christians allegedly directly denouncing red-letter
    statements of Jesus straight from their King James (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he first impinged
    on my awareness back in the 1980s, and never voted for the
    SOB (What can I say, I lived in Commiefornia at the time,
    and my vote was a meaningless gesture; I chose to make it
    a "Plague on both your parties" gesture.) I find it very
    telling that in this story that the only alleged Christians
    who are putting their politics above Jesus are on the right.
    No one on the left has ever, ever, EVER done, said, or believed
    ANYTHING contrary to one bit of Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan political
    screed than factual.

    --
    Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
    mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
    KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

    The left doesn't claim any religious affiliation with, or for, their call for government action, much unlike Evangelists do constantly... The left's political goals are secular humanist... The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow
    their King, because he said so!

    Father Devine Jr.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Lampson@21:1/5 to bfh on Sat Aug 12 22:01:32 2023
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 9:30:56 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:05:36 PM UTC-7, Mike Van Pelt
    wrote:
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3...@dont-email.me>, sticks
    <wolve...@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about
    quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in
    their preaching—'turn the other cheek'—[and] to have
    someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get those liberal
    talking points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus
    Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get to
    the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as
    subversive to us, then we're in a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706



    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to
    hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an NPR
    propaganda interview reported on the Democrat party mouthpiece
    newsweek magazine website quoting a disgraced Never-Trumper who
    no one gives two shits about what he says anymore. Right...
    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of this tale of
    alleged Christians allegedly directly denouncing red-letter
    statements of Jesus straight from their King James (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he first impinged on
    my awareness back in the 1980s, and never voted for the SOB (What
    can I say, I lived in Commiefornia at the time, and my vote was a
    meaningless gesture; I chose to make it a "Plague on both your
    parties" gesture.) I find it very telling that in this story that
    the only alleged Christians who are putting their politics above
    Jesus are on the right. No one on the left has ever, ever, EVER
    done, said, or believed ANYTHING contrary to one bit of
    Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan political screed
    than factual.

    -- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts." mvp at
    calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane KE6BVH
    | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

    The left doesn't claim any religious affiliation with, or for,
    their call for government action, much unlike Evangelists do
    constantly... The left's political goals are secular humanist...
    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their
    King, because he said so!
    The left wants the whole nation to blindly follow their Science,
    because they say so.

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Sounds like a far more reasonable course of action to me... It's going with what's known, or at least indicated by available information, vs what an imaginary King up in the sky requires, with a 2,000 year old book of mythology, filled with
    inaccuracies , as their "evidence".....

    Elmer Gantry Jr.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Don Lampson on Sun Aug 13 00:30:51 2023
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:05:36 PM UTC-7, Mike Van Pelt
    wrote:
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3...@dont-email.me>, sticks
    <wolve...@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about
    quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in
    their preaching—'turn the other cheek'—[and] to have
    someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get those liberal
    talking points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus
    Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get to
    the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as
    subversive to us, then we're in a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706



    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to
    hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an NPR
    propaganda interview reported on the Democrat party mouthpiece
    newsweek magazine website quoting a disgraced Never-Trumper who
    no one gives two shits about what he says anymore. Right...
    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of this tale of
    alleged Christians allegedly directly denouncing red-letter
    statements of Jesus straight from their King James (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he first impinged on
    my awareness back in the 1980s, and never voted for the SOB (What
    can I say, I lived in Commiefornia at the time, and my vote was a
    meaningless gesture; I chose to make it a "Plague on both your
    parties" gesture.) I find it very telling that in this story that
    the only alleged Christians who are putting their politics above
    Jesus are on the right. No one on the left has ever, ever, EVER
    done, said, or believed ANYTHING contrary to one bit of
    Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan political screed
    than factual.

    -- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts." mvp at
    calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane KE6BVH
    | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

    The left doesn't claim any religious affiliation with, or for,
    their call for government action, much unlike Evangelists do
    constantly... The left's political goals are secular humanist...
    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their
    King, because he said so!

    The left wants the whole nation to blindly follow their Science,
    because they say so.

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Don Lampson on Sun Aug 13 03:40:30 2023
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 9:30:56 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:05:36 PM UTC-7, Mike Van
    Pelt wrote:
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3...@dont-email.me>, sticks
    <wolve...@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story
    about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically,
    in
    their preaching—'turn the other cheek'—[and]
    to have someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get
    those liberal talking points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus
    Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get
    to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen
    as subversive to us, then we're in a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706





    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to
    hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an NPR
    propaganda interview reported on the Democrat party
    mouthpiece newsweek magazine website quoting a disgraced
    Never-Trumper who no one gives two shits about what he says
    anymore. Right...
    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of this tale
    of alleged Christians allegedly directly denouncing
    red-letter statements of Jesus straight from their King James
    (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he first
    impinged on my awareness back in the 1980s, and never voted
    for the SOB (What can I say, I lived in Commiefornia at the
    time, and my vote was a meaningless gesture; I chose to make
    it a "Plague on both your parties" gesture.) I find it very
    telling that in this story that the only alleged Christians
    who are putting their politics above Jesus are on the right.
    No one on the left has ever, ever, EVER done, said, or
    believed ANYTHING contrary to one bit of Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan political
    screed than factual.

    -- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
    mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out
    Hurricane KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

    The left doesn't claim any religious affiliation with, or for,
    their call for government action, much unlike Evangelists do
    constantly... The left's political goals are secular
    humanist... The Christian right wants the whole nation to
    blindly follow their King, because he said so!
    The left wants the whole nation to blindly follow their Science,
    because they say so.

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Sounds like a far more reasonable course of action to me... It's
    going with what's known, or at least indicated by available
    information, vs what an imaginary King up in the sky requires,
    with a 2,000 year old book of mythology, filled with inaccuracies ,
    as their "evidence".....

    There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit.... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/09/scientific-misconduct-retraction-watch

    And then there's the recent Faulsy shenanigans.

    Science these days is not much different from religion - you pick
    whatever piece of what is uniquely possibly bullshit that floats your
    boat, and run with it.

    --------------------------------------------------
    ‘We may be the last maskers’: California COVID cases are rising.
    Here’s why health experts are masking indoors
    13% increase in hospitalizations reported in three weeks ---------------------------------------------------- https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/08/02/we-may-be-the-last-maskers-covid-cases-are-rising-heres-why-health-experts-are-masking-indoors/

    Are you following that science?

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Lampson@21:1/5 to bfh on Sun Aug 13 17:58:35 2023
    On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:40:35 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 9:30:56 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:05:36 PM UTC-7, Mike Van >>> Pelt wrote:
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3...@dont-email.me>, sticks
    <wolve...@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story
    about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically,
    in
    their preaching 'turn the other cheek' [and]
    to have someone come up after to say, 'Where did you get
    those liberal talking points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting Jesus
    Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we get
    to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen
    as subversive to us, then we're in a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706





    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to
    hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an NPR
    propaganda interview reported on the Democrat party
    mouthpiece newsweek magazine website quoting a disgraced
    Never-Trumper who no one gives two shits about what he says
    anymore. Right...
    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of this tale
    of alleged Christians allegedly directly denouncing
    red-letter statements of Jesus straight from their King James
    (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he first
    impinged on my awareness back in the 1980s, and never voted
    for the SOB (What can I say, I lived in Commiefornia at the
    time, and my vote was a meaningless gesture; I chose to make
    it a "Plague on both your parties" gesture.) I find it very
    telling that in this story that the only alleged Christians
    who are putting their politics above Jesus are on the right.
    No one on the left has ever, ever, EVER done, said, or
    believed ANYTHING contrary to one bit of Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan political
    screed than factual.

    -- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
    mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out
    Hurricane KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

    The left doesn't claim any religious affiliation with, or for,
    their call for government action, much unlike Evangelists do
    constantly... The left's political goals are secular
    humanist... The Christian right wants the whole nation to
    blindly follow their King, because he said so!
    The left wants the whole nation to blindly follow their Science,
    because they say so.

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Sounds like a far more reasonable course of action to me... It's
    going with what's known, or at least indicated by available
    information, vs what an imaginary King up in the sky requires,
    with a 2,000 year old book of mythology, filled with inaccuracies ,
    as their "evidence".....
    There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit.... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/09/scientific-misconduct-retraction-watch

    And then there's the recent Faulsy shenanigans.

    Science these days is not much different from religion - you pick
    whatever piece of what is uniquely possibly bullshit that floats your
    boat, and run with it.

    --------------------------------------------------
    ‘We may be the last maskers’: California COVID cases are rising. Here’s why health experts are masking indoors
    13% increase in hospitalizations reported in three weeks ---------------------------------------------------- https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/08/02/we-may-be-the-last-maskers-covid-cases-are-rising-heres-why-health-experts-are-masking-indoors/

    Are you following that science?
    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    I try, but as any believing Christian can tell you, "The path is fraught with obstructions, temptations, and feelings of guilt..."

    An Occasional Secular Humanist Sinner

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Don Lampson on Sun Aug 13 21:27:51 2023
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:40:35 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 9:30:56 PM UTC-7, bfh
    wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:05:36 PM >>>>> UTC-7, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3...@dont-email.me>, sticks
    <wolve...@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same
    story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount,
    parenthetically, in
    their preaching 'turn the other >>>>>>> cheek' [and] to have someone come up >>>>>>> after to say, 'Where did you get those liberal talking
    points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting
    Jesus Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but
    that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we
    get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself
    are seen as subversive to us, then we're in a
    crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706







    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to
    hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an
    NPR propaganda interview reported on the Democrat
    party mouthpiece newsweek magazine website quoting a
    disgraced Never-Trumper who no one gives two shits
    about what he says anymore. Right...
    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of this
    tale of alleged Christians allegedly directly denouncing
    red-letter statements of Jesus straight from their King
    James (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he first
    impinged on my awareness back in the 1980s, and never
    voted for the SOB (What can I say, I lived in
    Commiefornia at the time, and my vote was a meaningless
    gesture; I chose to make it a "Plague on both your
    parties" gesture.) I find it very telling that in this
    story that the only alleged Christians who are putting
    their politics above Jesus are on the right. No one on
    the left has ever, ever, EVER done, said, or believed
    ANYTHING contrary to one bit of Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan political
    screed than factual.

    -- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're
    nuts." mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding
    out Hurricane KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in
    Galveston

    The left doesn't claim any religious affiliation with, or
    for, their call for government action, much unlike
    Evangelists do constantly... The left's political goals are
    secular humanist... The Christian right wants the whole
    nation to blindly follow their King, because he said so!
    The left wants the whole nation to blindly follow their
    Science, because they say so.

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Sounds like a far more reasonable course of action to me...
    It's going with what's known, or at least indicated by
    available information, vs what an imaginary King up in the sky
    requires, with a 2,000 year old book of mythology, filled with
    inaccuracies , as their "evidence".....
    There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to
    admit....
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/09/scientific-misconduct-retraction-watch



    And then there's the recent Faulsy shenanigans.

    Science these days is not much different from religion - you
    pick whatever piece of what is uniquely possibly bullshit that
    floats your boat, and run with it.

    -------------------------------------------------- ‘We may be
    the last maskers’: California COVID cases are rising. Here’s >> why health experts are masking indoors 13% increase in
    hospitalizations reported in three weeks
    ----------------------------------------------------
    https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/08/02/we-may-be-the-last-maskers-covid-cases-are-rising-heres-why-health-experts-are-masking-indoors/



    Are you following that science?
    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    I try, but as any believing Christian can tell you, "The path is
    fraught with obstructions, temptations, and feelings of guilt..."

    Well, as long as you're trying, feeling guilt, and don't take Fauci's
    name in vain............

    I'd pray for you, but it's been over 60 years since my last connection.

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Lampson@21:1/5 to bfh on Sun Aug 13 19:56:47 2023
    On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 6:27:55 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:40:35 AM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 9:30:56 PM UTC-7, bfh
    wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 9:05:36 PM >>>>> UTC-7, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3...@dont-email.me>, sticks
    <wolve...@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same
    story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount,
    parenthetically, in
    their preaching 'turn the other >>>>>>> cheek' [and] to have someone come up
    after to say, 'Where did you get those liberal talking
    points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally quoting
    Jesus Christ' ... The response would be, 'Yes, but
    that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When we
    get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself
    are seen as subversive to us, then we're in a
    crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706







    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to >>>>>>> hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of an
    NPR propaganda interview reported on the Democrat
    party mouthpiece newsweek magazine website quoting a
    disgraced Never-Trumper who no one gives two shits
    about what he says anymore. Right...
    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of this
    tale of alleged Christians allegedly directly denouncing
    red-letter statements of Jesus straight from their King
    James (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he first
    impinged on my awareness back in the 1980s, and never
    voted for the SOB (What can I say, I lived in
    Commiefornia at the time, and my vote was a meaningless
    gesture; I chose to make it a "Plague on both your
    parties" gesture.) I find it very telling that in this
    story that the only alleged Christians who are putting
    their politics above Jesus are on the right. No one on
    the left has ever, ever, EVER done, said, or believed
    ANYTHING contrary to one bit of Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan political
    screed than factual.

    -- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're
    nuts." mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding
    out Hurricane KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in
    Galveston

    The left doesn't claim any religious affiliation with, or
    for, their call for government action, much unlike
    Evangelists do constantly... The left's political goals are
    secular humanist... The Christian right wants the whole
    nation to blindly follow their King, because he said so!
    The left wants the whole nation to blindly follow their
    Science, because they say so.

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Sounds like a far more reasonable course of action to me...
    It's going with what's known, or at least indicated by
    available information, vs what an imaginary King up in the sky
    requires, with a 2,000 year old book of mythology, filled with
    inaccuracies , as their "evidence".....
    There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to
    admit....
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/09/scientific-misconduct-retraction-watch



    And then there's the recent Faulsy shenanigans.

    Science these days is not much different from religion - you
    pick whatever piece of what is uniquely possibly bullshit that
    floats your boat, and run with it.

    -------------------------------------------------- ‘We may be
    the last maskers’: California COVID cases are rising. Here’s >> why health experts are masking indoors 13% increase in
    hospitalizations reported in three weeks
    ----------------------------------------------------
    https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/08/02/we-may-be-the-last-maskers-covid-cases-are-rising-heres-why-health-experts-are-masking-indoors/



    Are you following that science?
    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    I try, but as any believing Christian can tell you, "The path is
    fraught with obstructions, temptations, and feelings of guilt..."
    Well, as long as you're trying, feeling guilt, and don't take Fauci's
    name in vain............

    I'd pray for you, but it's been over 60 years since my last connection.
    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    In Secular Humanism, nobody is sacred, and can easily be replaced, or made a laughing stock of, by more advanced, scientific, "shot callers"...
    Of course, I imagine whomever (using the scientific method) found that horse wormer, would cure Covid thought he'd had "a Eureka moment", too? Knowledge must always stumble through ignorance.....

    A Son of Mr. Wizard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Don Lampson on Sun Aug 13 23:25:40 2023
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 6:27:55 PM UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:40:35 AM UTC-7, bfh
    wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 9:30:56 PM >>>>> UTC-7, bfh wrote:
    Don Lampson wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at
    9:05:36 PM UTC-7, Mike
    Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ub6ie4$11g7j$3...@dont-email.me>, sticks
    <wolve...@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/10/2023 2:04 PM, TechnoBoob wrote:
    "Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same
    story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount,
    parenthetically, in
    their preachingâ€â€
    'turn the other
    cheek' [and] to
    have someone come up after to say, 'Where did you
    get those liberal talking points?'" Moore said.

    "When the pastor would say, 'I'm literally
    quoting Jesus Christ' ... The response would be,
    'Yes, but that
    doesn't work anymore. That's weak," he added. "When
    we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus
    himself are seen as subversive to us, then we're in
    a crisis.""

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706









    Yeah, when I want to understand where the Christian voter is I want to >>>>>>>>> hear from a Godless Pagan giving his impression of
    an NPR propaganda interview reported on the
    Democrat party mouthpiece newsweek magazine website
    quoting a disgraced Never-Trumper who no one gives
    two shits about what he says anymore. Right...
    I have very serious doubts about the veracity of
    this tale of alleged Christians allegedly directly
    denouncing red-letter statements of Jesus straight
    from their King James (TM) Bible.

    As someone who has despised Trump ever since he
    first impinged on my awareness back in the 1980s, and
    never voted for the SOB (What can I say, I lived in
    Commiefornia at the time, and my vote was a
    meaningless gesture; I chose to make it a "Plague on
    both your parties" gesture.) I find it very telling
    that in this story that the only alleged Christians
    who are putting their politics above Jesus are on the
    right. No one on the left has ever, ever, EVER done,
    said, or believed ANYTHING contrary to one bit of
    Christianity.

    That tells me that this story is more partisan
    political screed than factual.

    -- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're
    nuts." mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after
    riding out Hurricane KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach
    in Galveston

    The left doesn't claim any religious affiliation with,
    or for, their call for government action, much unlike
    Evangelists do constantly... The left's political goals
    are secular humanist... The Christian right wants the
    whole nation to blindly follow their King, because he
    said so!
    The left wants the whole nation to blindly follow their
    Science, because they say so.

    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    Sounds like a far more reasonable course of action to
    me... It's going with what's known, or at least indicated
    by available information, vs what an imaginary King up in
    the sky requires, with a 2,000 year old book of mythology,
    filled with inaccuracies , as their "evidence".....
    There’s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants
    to admit....
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/09/scientific-misconduct-retraction-watch





    And then there's the recent Faulsy shenanigans.

    Science these days is not much different from religion - you
    pick whatever piece of what is uniquely possibly bullshit
    that floats your boat, and run with it.

    -------------------------------------------------- ‘We
    may be the last maskers’: California COVID cases are
    rising. Here’s why health experts are masking indoors >>>> 13% increase in hospitalizations reported in three weeks
    ----------------------------------------------------
    https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/08/02/we-may-be-the-last-maskers-covid-cases-are-rising-heres-why-health-experts-are-masking-indoors/





    Are you following that science?
    -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    I try, but as any believing Christian can tell you, "The path
    is fraught with obstructions, temptations, and feelings of
    guilt..."
    Well, as long as you're trying, feeling guilt, and don't take
    Fauci's name in vain............

    I'd pray for you, but it's been over 60 years since my last
    connection. -- bill Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    In Secular Humanism, nobody is sacred, and can easily be replaced,
    or made a laughing stock of, by more advanced, scientific, "shot
    callers"... Of course, I imagine whomever (using the scientific
    method) found that horse wormer, would cure Covid thought he'd had
    "a Eureka moment", too? Knowledge must always stumble through
    ignorance.....

    Just about everybody has some strawgraspers lurking in their brain.
    Some people have a lot of them, some have very few. Billions of
    dollars are made from the influence of those little nefarious
    nanoscopic bastards.

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Don on Mon Aug 14 13:22:53 2023
    On 8/12/2023 9:51 PM, Don wrote:

    The left doesn't claim any religious affiliation with, or for, their call for government action, much unlike Evangelists do constantly... The left's political goals are secular humanist...

    Evangelicals are like any other group and have the same rights to
    address their government as those with opposing views. The constitution guarantees this right. As a "secular humanist", you specifically view
    the world in a way that rejects the words of our Declaration of
    Independence that states, “all men are created equal, that they are
    endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among
    these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” The
    constitution doesn't mention God, specifically because of the founders
    intent in maintaining religious neutrality. The Preamble to the
    Constitution declares that its purposes are “to form a more perfect
    Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
    common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty.” All secular ideals that flow from the the ideas invoked in
    the Declaration of Independence and our separation from England and it's Monarchy. The fact that the founders intended on not having a state
    religion and allowing people to freely worship as they choose doesn't
    mean Evangelicals lose their right to address the government, while at
    the same time it is OK for an entire political movement (the left as you
    claim above) that claims they specifically REJECT any belief in God to
    have superior rights in running things. That would be kinda unfair, and unconstitutional. You may not like religious people, but they do have
    rights. They're the same as yours.


    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their King, because he said so!

    Silly thing to say.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Don Lampson on Mon Aug 14 13:37:21 2023
    On 8/13/2023 9:56 PM, Don Lampson wrote:
    In Secular Humanism, nobody is sacred, and can easily be replaced, or made a laughing stock of, by more advanced, scientific, "shot callers"...
    Of course, I imagine whomever (using the scientific method) found that horse wormer, would cure Covid thought he'd had "a Eureka moment", too? Knowledge must always stumble through ignorance.....

    I assume you're speaking of ivermectin, a drug approved long ago for
    human use with basically zero side effects that has been called a
    "wonder drug" by the NIH. Are you unaware of the anti viral aspect of
    the drug, or do you just like using leftwing talking points in calling
    it a "horse wormer" to help Big Pharma and continue the campaign against
    any remedial treatment for things like covid? If so, you're gonna end
    up on the wrong side of history.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Van Pelt@21:1/5 to wolverine01@charter.net on Tue Aug 15 18:25:28 2023
    In article <ubdrdu$2e4k6$1@dont-email.me>,
    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/12/2023 9:51 PM, Don wrote:
    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their King, because he said so!

    Silly thing to say.

    There's not much point in trying to have a rational discussion with
    someone who thinks "Landover Baptist Church" is real.

    (I tried once. Even links to the Wikipedia article didn't convince 'em.)
    --
    Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
    mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
    KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Mike Van Pelt on Tue Aug 15 13:51:07 2023
    On 8/15/2023 1:25 PM, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ubdrdu$2e4k6$1@dont-email.me>,
    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/12/2023 9:51 PM, Don wrote:
    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their King, because he said so!

    Silly thing to say.

    There's not much point in trying to have a rational discussion with
    someone who thinks "Landover Baptist Church" is real.

    (I tried once. Even links to the Wikipedia article didn't convince 'em.)

    That's funny. I'll keep it in mind, but I really don't expect any
    rational responses from anything for much of what I write. It's usually
    just an exercise, though probably a waste of time in the end. I mainly
    just get a kick out of hearing what some of these people think.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kmiller@21:1/5 to Mike Van Pelt on Tue Aug 15 12:14:28 2023
    On 8/15/2023 11:25 AM, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ubdrdu$2e4k6$1@dont-email.me>,
    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/12/2023 9:51 PM, Don wrote:
    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their King, because he said so!

    Silly thing to say.

    There's not much point in trying to have a rational discussion with
    someone who thinks "Landover Baptist Church" is real.

    (I tried once. Even links to the Wikipedia article didn't convince 'em.)

    There's not much point in having rational discussions with those who
    believe in talking bushes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to kmiller on Tue Aug 15 14:51:21 2023
    On 8/15/2023 2:14 PM, kmiller wrote:
    On 8/15/2023 11:25 AM, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ubdrdu$2e4k6$1@dont-email.me>,
    sticks  <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/12/2023 9:51 PM, Don wrote:
    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their
    King,  because he said so!

    Silly thing to say.

    There's not much point in trying to have a rational discussion with
    someone who thinks "Landover Baptist Church" is real.

    (I tried once.  Even links to the Wikipedia article didn't convince 'em.)

    There's not much point in having rational discussions with those who
    believe in talking bushes.

    Never miss an opportunity to attack religious faith. If you don't have anything of substance to say, just attack.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert caprel@21:1/5 to sticks on Wed Aug 16 08:45:14 2023
    On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 11:37:26 AM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
    On 8/13/2023 9:56 PM, Don Lampson wrote:
    In Secular Humanism, nobody is sacred, and can easily be replaced, or made a laughing stock of, by more advanced, scientific, "shot callers"...
    Of course, I imagine whomever (using the scientific method) found that horse wormer, would cure Covid thought he'd had "a Eureka moment", too? Knowledge must always stumble through ignorance.....
    I assume you're speaking of ivermectin, a drug approved long ago for
    human use with basically zero side effects that has been called a
    "wonder drug" by the NIH. Are you unaware of the anti viral aspect of
    the drug, or do you just like using leftwing talking points in calling
    it a "horse wormer" to help Big Pharma and continue the campaign against
    any remedial treatment for things like covid? If so, you're gonna end
    up on the wrong side of history.

    Ah stick in the mud after some days absence finally made it back with his new supplies of stupid pills, you might want to share some with Mikie von Pelt he looks like he is badly in need of them

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to sticks on Wed Aug 16 22:36:23 2023
    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/15/2023 2:14 PM, kmiller wrote:
    On 8/15/2023 11:25 AM, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ubdrdu$2e4k6$1@dont-email.me>,
    sticks  <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/12/2023 9:51 PM, Don wrote:
    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their
    King,  because he said so!

    Silly thing to say.

    There's not much point in trying to have a rational discussion with
    someone who thinks "Landover Baptist Church" is real.

    (I tried once.  Even links to the Wikipedia article didn't convince 'em.) >>
    There's not much point in having rational discussions with those who
    believe in talking bushes.

    Never miss an opportunity to attack religious faith. If you don't have anything of substance to say, just attack.


    Liberal modus operandi.

    --
    Interesting scientific fact - your DNA is on everything you touch except
    your bag of coke.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to George.Anthony on Thu Aug 17 12:38:24 2023
    On 8/16/2023 5:36 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/15/2023 2:14 PM, kmiller wrote:
    On 8/15/2023 11:25 AM, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ubdrdu$2e4k6$1@dont-email.me>,
    sticks  <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/12/2023 9:51 PM, Don wrote:
    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their >>>>>> King,  because he said so!

    Silly thing to say.

    There's not much point in trying to have a rational discussion with
    someone who thinks "Landover Baptist Church" is real.

    (I tried once.  Even links to the Wikipedia article didn't convince 'em.) >>>
    There's not much point in having rational discussions with those who
    believe in talking bushes.

    Never miss an opportunity to attack religious faith. If you don't have
    anything of substance to say, just attack.


    Liberal modus operandi.

    Unfortunately, it is a way of doing business for those not really
    capable of honest discussion. It would be very easy for many people
    today to make a visual representation of the Moses account of the
    Burning Bush, what Miller describes as the "talking bushes." The issue
    for people like Miller is not that a bush can be made to not consume
    itself when it burns, but that people would believe in God. Some avoid
    saying that because it's always been a human right to have such beliefs.
    Others avoid it because they are not well enough informed to have a legitimate debate. Others, simply are not interested and have never
    really researched issues relating to life and existence, especially
    allowing for intelligent design. They are basically living with their
    own faith, that it is something not important.

    If you consider God's existence to be real the possibility of the
    biblical burning bush is nothing. All of the miracles are explainable
    if God exists. If you don't consider that, they're just a silly myths
    from simple minded people.

    Typically, people who do and say things like this, when asked if they
    believe in God will reply that no, they believe in science. Usually
    their understanding of the science and its shortcomings is about as good
    as their understanding of religious doctrine. My favorite question to
    ask someone like this is where the hydrogen and helium that exploded in
    what is called the Big Bang came from. As someone who doesn't believe
    in supernatural things like a burning bush, how did the hydrogen and
    helium appear from nothing? Why was it there, and how did it get there?

    This is where I believe they have faith. They don't have the answer,
    just the faith that it doesn't matter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jerry.osage@nospam.net@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 17 16:58:42 2023
    On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:38:24 -0500, sticks <wolverine01@charter.net>
    wrote:

    On 8/16/2023 5:36 PM, George.Anthony wrote:
    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/15/2023 2:14 PM, kmiller wrote:
    On 8/15/2023 11:25 AM, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <ubdrdu$2e4k6$1@dont-email.me>,
    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 8/12/2023 9:51 PM, Don wrote:
    The Christian right wants the whole nation to blindly follow their >>>>>>> King, because he said so!

    Silly thing to say.

    There's not much point in trying to have a rational discussion with
    someone who thinks "Landover Baptist Church" is real.

    (I tried once. Even links to the Wikipedia article didn't convince 'em.) >>>>
    There's not much point in having rational discussions with those who
    believe in talking bushes.

    Never miss an opportunity to attack religious faith. If you don't have
    anything of substance to say, just attack.


    Liberal modus operandi.

    Unfortunately, it is a way of doing business for those not really
    capable of honest discussion. It would be very easy for many people
    today to make a visual representation of the Moses account of the
    Burning Bush, what Miller describes as the "talking bushes." The issue
    for people like Miller is not that a bush can be made to not consume
    itself when it burns, but that people would believe in God. Some avoid >saying that because it's always been a human right to have such beliefs.
    Others avoid it because they are not well enough informed to have a
    legitimate debate. Others, simply are not interested and have never
    really researched issues relating to life and existence, especially
    allowing for intelligent design. They are basically living with their
    own faith, that it is something not important.

    If you consider God's existence to be real the possibility of the
    biblical burning bush is nothing. All of the miracles are explainable
    if God exists. If you don't consider that, they're just a silly myths
    from simple minded people.

    Typically, people who do and say things like this, when asked if they
    believe in God will reply that no, they believe in science. Usually
    their understanding of the science and its shortcomings is about as good
    as their understanding of religious doctrine. My favorite question to
    ask someone like this is where the hydrogen and helium that exploded in
    what is called the Big Bang came from. As someone who doesn't believe
    in supernatural things like a burning bush, how did the hydrogen and
    helium appear from nothing? Why was it there, and how did it get there?

    This is where I believe they have faith. They don't have the answer,
    just the faith that it doesn't matter.

    It's turtles all the way down.
    It's all we know and all we need to know.
    Selah

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dm_callier@21:1/5 to jerry...@nospam.net on Thu Aug 17 15:45:33 2023
    On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 2:58:46 PM UTC-7, jerry...@nospam.net wrote: <BigSnip
    It's turtles all the way down.
    It's all we know and all we need to know.
    Selah

    I wonder what Vishnu would choose...AK-47 or AR-15?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)