• Boeing has now lost $1.1 billion on Starliner

    From Frank Howell@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 27 10:06:18 2023
    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on June
    1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of these
    involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the Starliner
    capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with hundreds of
    feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft found to be flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract, as
    part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any cost overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e
    --
    Frank Howell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Frank Howell on Thu Jul 27 14:42:47 2023
    Frank Howell wrote:
    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on
    June 1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of these involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the Starliner
    capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with hundreds
    of feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft found to be flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract,
    as part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any
    cost overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    So....look....at the end of the day going forward, does the calculus
    of that indicate that Boeing will literally be.....like....self-held accountable within a statistically significant passage of time?

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to Frank Howell on Thu Jul 27 14:41:02 2023
    On 7/27/2023 12:06 PM, Frank Howell wrote:
    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on June
    1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of these
    involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the Starliner
    capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with hundreds of
    feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft found to be flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract, as
    part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any cost overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    Maybe they should hire Elon as a consultant.
    --
    NAGA Dimocrats are the diseased who are infecting the entire country
    with insanity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jerry.osage@nospam.net@21:1/5 to fphowell@usermail.com on Thu Jul 27 16:03:18 2023
    On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:06:18 -0700, Frank Howell
    <fphowell@usermail.com> wrote:

    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on June
    1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of these
    involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the Starliner
    capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with hundreds of
    feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft found to be flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract, as
    part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any cost >overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    "Nine years ago, when NASA down-selected to Boeing and SpaceX to
    provide crew transportation services to the space station, Boeing was considered the prohibitive favorite to deliver first for NASA.
    However, SpaceX will launch its seventh operational mission and eighth
    overall crew mission for NASA next month."

    Asked whether Starliner might be able to launch this year, Stich,
    NASA's Commercial Crew program manager, did not offer a concrete
    timetable. "We're not really ready to talk about a launch opportunity
    yet," he said. "We're going to work the technical issues first, and
    then we'll sit down with the Boeing team when the time is right and
    pick a launch target."

    Having a "Cost +" attitude where delays and cost overruns are a good
    thing doesn't fly (excuse the pun) with a "Fixed Price Contract". I
    suspect that the Starliner's Tech will be verging on obsolete by the
    time it flies.

    The wrapping tape not tested until the wiring bundles are wrapped and
    installed is definitely a "Cost +" attitude.

    Go SpaceX!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to jerry.osage@nospam.net on Thu Jul 27 21:42:18 2023
    On 7/27/2023 4:03 PM, jerry.osage@nospam.net wrote:
    On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:06:18 -0700, Frank Howell
    <fphowell@usermail.com> wrote:

    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on June
    1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of these
    involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the Starliner
    capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with hundreds of
    feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft found to be flammable. >>
    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract, as
    part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any cost
    overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    "Nine years ago, when NASA down-selected to Boeing and SpaceX to
    provide crew transportation services to the space station, Boeing was considered the prohibitive favorite to deliver first for NASA.
    However, SpaceX will launch its seventh operational mission and eighth overall crew mission for NASA next month."

    Asked whether Starliner might be able to launch this year, Stich,
    NASA's Commercial Crew program manager, did not offer a concrete
    timetable. "We're not really ready to talk about a launch opportunity
    yet," he said. "We're going to work the technical issues first, and
    then we'll sit down with the Boeing team when the time is right and
    pick a launch target."

    Having a "Cost +" attitude where delays and cost overruns are a good
    thing doesn't fly (excuse the pun) with a "Fixed Price Contract". I
    suspect that the Starliner's Tech will be verging on obsolete by the
    time it flies.

    The wrapping tape not tested until the wiring bundles are wrapped and installed is definitely a "Cost +" attitude.

    Go SpaceX!

    The old culture at Boeing definitely cost them in this instance. I don't
    know why they agreed to a fixed cost deal when cost + had been a winner
    for them. Maybe they felt they had to bite the bullet to compete with
    Space X for the business.

    You can't just change a decades old culture overnight. It's like trying
    to do a U-turn with an aircraft carrier in a pond. Probably can be done
    but it would take a lot of maneuvering.
    --
    NAGA Dimocrats are the diseased who are infecting the entire country
    with insanity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jerry.osage@nospam.net@21:1/5 to ganthony@gmail.org on Thu Jul 27 23:09:53 2023
    On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 21:42:18 -0500, "George.Anthony"
    <ganthony@gmail.org> wrote:

    On 7/27/2023 4:03 PM, jerry.osage@nospam.net wrote:
    On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:06:18 -0700, Frank Howell
    <fphowell@usermail.com> wrote:

    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on June >>> 1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of these
    involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the Starliner
    capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with hundreds of
    feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft found to be flammable. >>>
    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract, as
    part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any cost
    overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    "Nine years ago, when NASA down-selected to Boeing and SpaceX to
    provide crew transportation services to the space station, Boeing was
    considered the prohibitive favorite to deliver first for NASA.
    However, SpaceX will launch its seventh operational mission and eighth
    overall crew mission for NASA next month."

    Asked whether Starliner might be able to launch this year, Stich,
    NASA's Commercial Crew program manager, did not offer a concrete
    timetable. "We're not really ready to talk about a launch opportunity
    yet," he said. "We're going to work the technical issues first, and
    then we'll sit down with the Boeing team when the time is right and
    pick a launch target."

    Having a "Cost +" attitude where delays and cost overruns are a good
    thing doesn't fly (excuse the pun) with a "Fixed Price Contract". I
    suspect that the Starliner's Tech will be verging on obsolete by the
    time it flies.

    The wrapping tape not tested until the wiring bundles are wrapped and
    installed is definitely a "Cost +" attitude.

    Go SpaceX!

    The old culture at Boeing definitely cost them in this instance. I don't
    know why they agreed to a fixed cost deal when cost + had been a winner
    for them. Maybe they felt they had to bite the bullet to compete with
    Space X for the business.

    You can't just change a decades old culture overnight. It's like trying
    to do a U-turn with an aircraft carrier in a pond. Probably can be done
    but it would take a lot of maneuvering.

    OI suspect that they thought that SpaceX was going to fail and they
    would have a head start when a new player was brought in. And, with
    SpaceX failing it would prove just what a difficult task it was going
    to be - and Boeing could renegotiate their contract.

    Big, old companies are management heavy and are slow from start to
    finish. SpaceX probably had a prototype nearing completion while
    Boeing was still deciding who was going to manage what.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to jerry.osage@nospam.net on Fri Jul 28 10:23:30 2023
    On 7/27/2023 11:09 PM, jerry.osage@nospam.net wrote:
    On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 21:42:18 -0500, "George.Anthony"
    <ganthony@gmail.org> wrote:

    On 7/27/2023 4:03 PM, jerry.osage@nospam.net wrote:
    On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:06:18 -0700, Frank Howell
    <fphowell@usermail.com> wrote:

    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on June >>>> 1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of these
    involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the Starliner
    capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with hundreds of >>>> feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft found to be flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract, as >>>> part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any cost >>>> overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    "Nine years ago, when NASA down-selected to Boeing and SpaceX to
    provide crew transportation services to the space station, Boeing was
    considered the prohibitive favorite to deliver first for NASA.
    However, SpaceX will launch its seventh operational mission and eighth
    overall crew mission for NASA next month."

    Asked whether Starliner might be able to launch this year, Stich,
    NASA's Commercial Crew program manager, did not offer a concrete
    timetable. "We're not really ready to talk about a launch opportunity
    yet," he said. "We're going to work the technical issues first, and
    then we'll sit down with the Boeing team when the time is right and
    pick a launch target."

    Having a "Cost +" attitude where delays and cost overruns are a good
    thing doesn't fly (excuse the pun) with a "Fixed Price Contract". I
    suspect that the Starliner's Tech will be verging on obsolete by the
    time it flies.

    The wrapping tape not tested until the wiring bundles are wrapped and
    installed is definitely a "Cost +" attitude.

    Go SpaceX!

    The old culture at Boeing definitely cost them in this instance. I don't
    know why they agreed to a fixed cost deal when cost + had been a winner
    for them. Maybe they felt they had to bite the bullet to compete with
    Space X for the business.

    You can't just change a decades old culture overnight. It's like trying
    to do a U-turn with an aircraft carrier in a pond. Probably can be done
    but it would take a lot of maneuvering.

    OI suspect that they thought that SpaceX was going to fail and they
    would have a head start when a new player was brought in. And, with
    SpaceX failing it would prove just what a difficult task it was going
    to be - and Boeing could renegotiate their contract.

    Big, old companies are management heavy and are slow from start to
    finish.

    Kinda' like our government. Actually a lot like our government.

    SpaceX probably had a prototype nearing completion while
    Boeing was still deciding who was going to manage what.

    --
    NAGA Dimocrats are the diseased who are infecting the entire country
    with insanity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Howell@21:1/5 to George.Anthony on Sat Jul 29 15:30:29 2023
    George.Anthony wrote:
    On 7/27/2023 12:06 PM, Frank Howell wrote:
    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on
    June 1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of these
    involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the Starliner
    capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with hundreds
    of feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft found to be
    flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract,
    as part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any
    cost overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    Maybe they should hire Elon as a consultant.
    What due to his Twitter prowess?

    --
    Frank Howell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Howell@21:1/5 to bfh on Sat Jul 29 15:29:49 2023
    bfh wrote:
    Frank Howell wrote:
    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on
    June 1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of these
    involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the Starliner
    capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with hundreds
    of feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft found to be
    flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract,
    as part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any
    cost overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    So....look....at the end of the day going forward, does the calculus of
    that indicate that Boeing will literally be.....like....self-held
    accountable within a statistically significant passage of time?

    Well if fixed contract means what it says, then yes.

    --
    Frank Howell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Frank Howell on Sat Jul 29 19:49:28 2023
    Frank Howell wrote:
    George.Anthony wrote:
    On 7/27/2023 12:06 PM, Frank Howell wrote:
    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on
    June 1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of
    these involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the
    Starliner capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came
    with hundreds of feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the
    spacecraft found to be flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the
    Starliner program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of
    this, Boeing's Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss
    of $527 million during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price
    contract, as part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is
    responsible for any cost overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    Maybe they should hire Elon as a consultant.
    What due to  his Twitter prowess?

    Since we're talking about rockets, we should probably talk about
    rockets, and Elon has gotten many more rockets off the ground this
    year than ULA. However comma if you insist on tweets as a metric, I'll
    bet Elon has launched many more tweets this year than ULA, too.

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George.Anthony@21:1/5 to Frank Howell on Sat Jul 29 19:21:01 2023
    On 7/29/2023 5:30 PM, Frank Howell wrote:
    George.Anthony wrote:
    On 7/27/2023 12:06 PM, Frank Howell wrote:
    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on
    June 1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of
    these involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the
    Starliner capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came with
    hundreds of feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the spacecraft
    found to be flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the Starliner
    program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of this, Boeing's
    Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss of $527 million
    during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price contract,
    as part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is responsible for any
    cost overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    Maybe they should hire Elon as a consultant.
    What due to  his Twitter prowess?


    Is that the best you can do?
    --
    NAGA Dimocrats are the diseased who are infecting the entire country
    with insanity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bfh@21:1/5 to Frank Howell on Sun Jul 30 20:06:07 2023
    Frank Howell wrote:
    George.Anthony wrote:
    On 7/27/2023 12:06 PM, Frank Howell wrote:
    Just weeks before this launch was due to occur, Boeing announced on
    June 1 that there were two serious issues with Starliner. One of
    these involved the "soft links" in the lines that connect the
    Starliner capsule to its parachutes, and the second problem came
    with hundreds of feet of P-213 glass cloth tape inside the
    spacecraft found to be flammable.

    This brings the company's total write-down of losses on the
    Starliner program to more than $1.1 billion. Partly because of
    this, Boeing's Defense, Space, & Security division reported a loss
    of $527 million during the second quarter of this year.

    Because Starliner was funded by NASA through a fixed-price
    contract, as part of the Commercial Crew program, Boeing is
    responsible for any cost overruns and financial losses due to delays.

    https://tinyurl.com/mr34pf6e

    Maybe they should hire Elon as a consultant.
    What due to  his Twitter prowess?

    This is how Twitterman.....oops......I mean Xman does it: https://youtu.be/HisrxVNaePY?t=4701

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)