XPost: ucb.math, alt.society.civil-liberty, ca.environment
XPost: alt.mountain-bike

In what is being called ‘the biggest hustle in human history,’ a
special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on
Barack Obama. The claim turns out to be false.

As investigators delve further into the background of Barack
Obama, a disturbing picture is emerging of a man who is not who
he claims to be. The information the public has been told
concerning Obama is turning out to be false–fabrications and
inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that had
clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the
land.

According to a special report issued by ‘the Blogging
Professor,’ the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama. The
report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a
‘constitutional professor and scholar,’ and that he never served
as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the
school.

The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an ‘instructor’
at Chicago Law School, not a professor. Commonly, instructors
are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and
universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well
below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.

In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors
is below that of associate professors and professors because
they lack the credentials.

In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack
Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history
in higher education are a complete sham. The President of the
United States is a complete fraud.

According to Doug Ross:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at
Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice
things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as
an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the
law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling
them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give
him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be
a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a
temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an
adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy,
unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it
was clear that the position was nothing more than a political
stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the
lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted
whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law
Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only
editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while
in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Thus, the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor
of the Harvard Law Review a ‘put-up job’ as well, allowing the
student to claim he held this prestigious position without
having the qualifications or meeting the requirements of
holding that position? And why?

Further,

Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the
Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered
his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he
“fibbed” on his bar application.

2. Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in
1993.

3. So, we have the President and First Lady – who don’t
actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.

4. A senior lecturer is one thing. A fully ranked law
professor is another. According to the Chicago Sun-Times,
“Obama did NOT ‘hold the title’ of a University of Chicago law
school professor”. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law
professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March,
2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor”
in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught
courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the
school confirmed in 2008.

These are highly disturbing facts, verified facts from the
people who know at the Chicago Law School.

There is more from Ross, however:

6. “He did not hold the title of professor of law,” said Marsha
Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and
Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the
U.S. Constitution recently during his State of the Union
Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the
Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video.

9. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said:
“We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the
promise enshrined in ourConstitution: the notion that we are
all created equal.”

10. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders
named them unalienable rights. The document is our
Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths
to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court
moments later in the same speech?

When you are a phony it’s hard to keep facts straight.

Obama has made sure that all of his records are sealed tight.
And apart from the courageous souls at the various educational
institutions who dared to speak the truth, the schools Obama
claimed to attend unanimously refuse to release transcripts,
records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama’s presence
in their institutions.

BREAKING DEVELOPMENT–just as these disturbing facts come to
light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals
with numerous ‘journalists,’ promising unprecedented access to
the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain
information ‘they may discover.’

http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2012/04/11/investigation- reveals-numerous-bogus-claims-on-obama-resume/
 

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)