• Why are we still talking about the imaginary god ?

    From Ted@21:1/5 to aaa on Sat May 6 09:06:54 2017
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks

    aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 05/03/2017 05:54 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Tue, 2 May 2017 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
    <youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 8:25:57 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 05/02/2017 06:14 AM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
    On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 12:25:58 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 04/30/2017 09:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 29 Apr 2017 05:08 PM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 04/29/2017 05:24 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2017 05:32 AM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:



    I would not talk about philosophy if I don't understand
    it.


    And there's the biggest lie of all.

    Prove it.


    You prove it every time you post another one of your idiotic
    screeds.

    That's circular.






    Nope, it's evidence. Every time you post it includes nonsense that
    you seem to think is profound when in reality it's just the ravings
    of either a troll or an idiot.


    That's just your claim the same as the original one, but you have yet
    shown a better understanding than mine to prove me wrong. That is why
    you are circular.

    See, the ranting of a troll or an idiot.

    Kill file the baaastaaard and move on. I don't understand why you all
    give him so much attention.


    The claim is neither mine alone or circular it is still you speaking
    nonsense and then telling everybody who doesn't understand what you are
    talking about that they don't get it.

    The thing is nobody gets it.
    Not just me.
    Since you don't understand or pretend not to understand what facts and
    evidence are there is no point in discussing anything with you.

    Some trolls we can keep as pets, but aaa never was properly house
    trained, and the right thing to do is to have it put down.


    This pet is destroying your evolution fantasy with science and
    philosophy. And you can't do a thing to stop it.

    Thank you, aaa. Evolution has never been able to explain complex biological processes, such as the life cycle of the malarial mosquito. Neither has it
    ever been able to explain obvious intelligently engineered designs, such as
    the morphology of the tapeworm. (Also, no evolutionist is able to
    adequately explain why are there still monkeys.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to duke on Sat May 6 11:43:25 2017
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks

    duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 6 May 2017 09:06:54 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 05/03/2017 05:54 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Tue, 2 May 2017 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
    <youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 8:25:57 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 05/02/2017 06:14 AM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
    On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 12:25:58 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 04/30/2017 09:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 29 Apr 2017 05:08 PM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 04/29/2017 05:24 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2017 05:32 AM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:



    I would not talk about philosophy if I don't understand >>>>>>>>>>>> it.


    And there's the biggest lie of all.

    Prove it.


    You prove it every time you post another one of your idiotic >>>>>>>>> screeds.

    That's circular.






    Nope, it's evidence. Every time you post it includes nonsense that >>>>>>> you seem to think is profound when in reality it's just the ravings >>>>>>> of either a troll or an idiot.


    That's just your claim the same as the original one, but you have yet >>>>>> shown a better understanding than mine to prove me wrong. That is why >>>>>> you are circular.

    See, the ranting of a troll or an idiot.

    Kill file the baaastaaard and move on. I don't understand why you all
    give him so much attention.


    The claim is neither mine alone or circular it is still you speaking >>>>> nonsense and then telling everybody who doesn't understand what you are >>>>> talking about that they don't get it.

    The thing is nobody gets it.
    Not just me.
    Since you don't understand or pretend not to understand what facts and >>>>> evidence are there is no point in discussing anything with you.

    Some trolls we can keep as pets, but aaa never was properly house
    trained, and the right thing to do is to have it put down.


    This pet is destroying your evolution fantasy with science and
    philosophy. And you can't do a thing to stop it.

    Thank you, aaa. Evolution has never been able to explain complex biological >> processes, such as the life cycle of the malarial mosquito. Neither has it >> ever been able to explain obvious intelligently engineered designs, such as >> the morphology of the tapeworm. (Also, no evolutionist is able to
    adequately explain why are there still monkeys.)

    That's easy. It's called a split.

    And yet splits are intelligently designed. (Although one might reasonably
    argue that it's hardly intelligent to consume so many naked carbohydrate calories at one sitting.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From duke@21:1/5 to Ted on Sat May 6 06:32:53 2017
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks

    On Sat, 6 May 2017 09:06:54 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 05/03/2017 05:54 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Tue, 2 May 2017 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
    <youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 8:25:57 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 05/02/2017 06:14 AM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
    On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 12:25:58 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 04/30/2017 09:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 29 Apr 2017 05:08 PM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 04/29/2017 05:24 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2017 05:32 AM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:



    I would not talk about philosophy if I don't understand
    it.


    And there's the biggest lie of all.

    Prove it.


    You prove it every time you post another one of your idiotic
    screeds.

    That's circular.






    Nope, it's evidence. Every time you post it includes nonsense that >>>>>> you seem to think is profound when in reality it's just the ravings >>>>>> of either a troll or an idiot.


    That's just your claim the same as the original one, but you have yet >>>>> shown a better understanding than mine to prove me wrong. That is why >>>>> you are circular.

    See, the ranting of a troll or an idiot.

    Kill file the baaastaaard and move on. I don't understand why you all
    give him so much attention.


    The claim is neither mine alone or circular it is still you speaking
    nonsense and then telling everybody who doesn't understand what you are >>>> talking about that they don't get it.

    The thing is nobody gets it.
    Not just me.
    Since you don't understand or pretend not to understand what facts and >>>> evidence are there is no point in discussing anything with you.

    Some trolls we can keep as pets, but aaa never was properly house
    trained, and the right thing to do is to have it put down.


    This pet is destroying your evolution fantasy with science and
    philosophy. And you can't do a thing to stop it.

    Thank you, aaa. Evolution has never been able to explain complex biological >processes, such as the life cycle of the malarial mosquito. Neither has it >ever been able to explain obvious intelligently engineered designs, such as >the morphology of the tapeworm. (Also, no evolutionist is able to
    adequately explain why are there still monkeys.)

    That's easy. It's called a split.

    the dukester, American-American

    *****
    "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
    Pope Paul VI
    *****

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From duke@21:1/5 to Ted on Sat May 6 12:52:10 2017
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks

    On Sat, 6 May 2017 11:43:25 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 6 May 2017 09:06:54 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 05/03/2017 05:54 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Tue, 2 May 2017 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
    <youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 8:25:57 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 05/02/2017 06:14 AM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
    On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 12:25:58 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 04/30/2017 09:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 29 Apr 2017 05:08 PM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 04/29/2017 05:24 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2017 05:32 AM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:



    I would not talk about philosophy if I don't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>> it.


    And there's the biggest lie of all.

    Prove it.


    You prove it every time you post another one of your idiotic >>>>>>>>>> screeds.

    That's circular.






    Nope, it's evidence. Every time you post it includes nonsense that >>>>>>>> you seem to think is profound when in reality it's just the ravings >>>>>>>> of either a troll or an idiot.


    That's just your claim the same as the original one, but you have yet >>>>>>> shown a better understanding than mine to prove me wrong. That is why >>>>>>> you are circular.

    See, the ranting of a troll or an idiot.

    Kill file the baaastaaard and move on. I don't understand why you all >>>>> give him so much attention.


    The claim is neither mine alone or circular it is still you speaking >>>>>> nonsense and then telling everybody who doesn't understand what you are >>>>>> talking about that they don't get it.

    The thing is nobody gets it.
    Not just me.
    Since you don't understand or pretend not to understand what facts and >>>>>> evidence are there is no point in discussing anything with you.

    Some trolls we can keep as pets, but aaa never was properly house
    trained, and the right thing to do is to have it put down.


    This pet is destroying your evolution fantasy with science and
    philosophy. And you can't do a thing to stop it.

    Thank you, aaa. Evolution has never been able to explain complex biological >>> processes, such as the life cycle of the malarial mosquito. Neither has it >>> ever been able to explain obvious intelligently engineered designs, such as >>> the morphology of the tapeworm. (Also, no evolutionist is able to
    adequately explain why are there still monkeys.)

    That's easy. It's called a split.

    And yet splits are intelligently designed. (Although one might reasonably >argue that it's hardly intelligent to consume so many naked carbohydrate >calories at one sitting.)

    Maybe you should consider that the split produced 2 parallel lines. You're trying to make a monkey out of a molehill.

    the dukester, American-American

    *****
    "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
    Pope Paul VI
    *****

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to duke on Sat May 6 22:50:35 2017
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks

    duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 6 May 2017 11:43:25 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 6 May 2017 09:06:54 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 05/03/2017 05:54 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Tue, 2 May 2017 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
    <youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 8:25:57 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 05/02/2017 06:14 AM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
    On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 12:25:58 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 04/30/2017 09:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 29 Apr 2017 05:08 PM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/29/2017 05:24 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2017 05:32 AM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>


    I would not talk about philosophy if I don't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.


    And there's the biggest lie of all.

    Prove it.


    You prove it every time you post another one of your idiotic >>>>>>>>>>> screeds.

    That's circular.






    Nope, it's evidence. Every time you post it includes nonsense that >>>>>>>>> you seem to think is profound when in reality it's just the ravings >>>>>>>>> of either a troll or an idiot.


    That's just your claim the same as the original one, but you have yet >>>>>>>> shown a better understanding than mine to prove me wrong. That is why >>>>>>>> you are circular.

    See, the ranting of a troll or an idiot.

    Kill file the baaastaaard and move on. I don't understand why you all >>>>>> give him so much attention.


    The claim is neither mine alone or circular it is still you speaking >>>>>>> nonsense and then telling everybody who doesn't understand what you are >>>>>>> talking about that they don't get it.

    The thing is nobody gets it.
    Not just me.
    Since you don't understand or pretend not to understand what facts and >>>>>>> evidence are there is no point in discussing anything with you.

    Some trolls we can keep as pets, but aaa never was properly house
    trained, and the right thing to do is to have it put down.


    This pet is destroying your evolution fantasy with science and
    philosophy. And you can't do a thing to stop it.

    Thank you, aaa. Evolution has never been able to explain complex biological
    processes, such as the life cycle of the malarial mosquito. Neither has it >>>> ever been able to explain obvious intelligently engineered designs, such as
    the morphology of the tapeworm. (Also, no evolutionist is able to
    adequately explain why are there still monkeys.)

    That's easy. It's called a split.

    And yet splits are intelligently designed. (Although one might reasonably
    argue that it's hardly intelligent to consume so many naked carbohydrate
    calories at one sitting.)

    Maybe you should consider that the split produced 2 parallel lines. You're trying to make a monkey out of a molehill.

    Aha! You can't explain how molehills evolved either!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From duke@21:1/5 to Ted on Sun May 7 11:26:50 2017
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks

    On Sat, 6 May 2017 22:50:35 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 6 May 2017 11:43:25 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 6 May 2017 09:06:54 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 05/03/2017 05:54 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Tue, 2 May 2017 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
    <youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 8:25:57 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 05/02/2017 06:14 AM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
    On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 12:25:58 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 04/30/2017 09:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 29 Apr 2017 05:08 PM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/29/2017 05:24 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2017 05:32 AM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>


    I would not talk about philosophy if I don't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.


    And there's the biggest lie of all.

    Prove it.


    You prove it every time you post another one of your idiotic >>>>>>>>>>>> screeds.

    That's circular.






    Nope, it's evidence. Every time you post it includes nonsense that >>>>>>>>>> you seem to think is profound when in reality it's just the ravings >>>>>>>>>> of either a troll or an idiot.


    That's just your claim the same as the original one, but you have yet >>>>>>>>> shown a better understanding than mine to prove me wrong. That is why >>>>>>>>> you are circular.

    See, the ranting of a troll or an idiot.

    Kill file the baaastaaard and move on. I don't understand why you all >>>>>>> give him so much attention.


    The claim is neither mine alone or circular it is still you speaking >>>>>>>> nonsense and then telling everybody who doesn't understand what you are
    talking about that they don't get it.

    The thing is nobody gets it.
    Not just me.
    Since you don't understand or pretend not to understand what facts and >>>>>>>> evidence are there is no point in discussing anything with you. >>>>>>>
    Some trolls we can keep as pets, but aaa never was properly house >>>>>>> trained, and the right thing to do is to have it put down.


    This pet is destroying your evolution fantasy with science and
    philosophy. And you can't do a thing to stop it.

    Thank you, aaa. Evolution has never been able to explain complex biological
    processes, such as the life cycle of the malarial mosquito. Neither has it
    ever been able to explain obvious intelligently engineered designs, such as
    the morphology of the tapeworm. (Also, no evolutionist is able to
    adequately explain why are there still monkeys.)

    That's easy. It's called a split.

    And yet splits are intelligently designed. (Although one might reasonably >>> argue that it's hardly intelligent to consume so many naked carbohydrate >>> calories at one sitting.)

    Maybe you should consider that the split produced 2 parallel lines. You're >> trying to make a monkey out of a molehill.

    Aha! You can't explain how molehills evolved either!

    Of course I can. The wee creatures.

    the dukester, American-American

    *****
    "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
    Pope Paul VI
    *****

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to duke on Sun May 7 19:25:49 2017
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
    XPost: alt.usenet.kooks

    duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 6 May 2017 22:50:35 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 6 May 2017 11:43:25 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 6 May 2017 09:06:54 +0000 (UTC), Ted <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> wrote:

    aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote:
    On 05/03/2017 05:54 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
    On Tue, 2 May 2017 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
    <youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 8:25:57 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
    On 05/02/2017 06:14 AM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
    On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 12:25:58 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2017 09:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 29 Apr 2017 05:08 PM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/29/2017 05:24 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
    On 28 Apr 2017 05:32 AM ,aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>


    I would not talk about philosophy if I don't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.


    And there's the biggest lie of all.

    Prove it.


    You prove it every time you post another one of your idiotic >>>>>>>>>>>>> screeds.

    That's circular.






    Nope, it's evidence. Every time you post it includes nonsense that >>>>>>>>>>> you seem to think is profound when in reality it's just the ravings >>>>>>>>>>> of either a troll or an idiot.


    That's just your claim the same as the original one, but you have yet
    shown a better understanding than mine to prove me wrong. That is why
    you are circular.

    See, the ranting of a troll or an idiot.

    Kill file the baaastaaard and move on. I don't understand why you all >>>>>>>> give him so much attention.


    The claim is neither mine alone or circular it is still you speaking >>>>>>>>> nonsense and then telling everybody who doesn't understand what you are
    talking about that they don't get it.

    The thing is nobody gets it.
    Not just me.
    Since you don't understand or pretend not to understand what facts and
    evidence are there is no point in discussing anything with you. >>>>>>>>
    Some trolls we can keep as pets, but aaa never was properly house >>>>>>>> trained, and the right thing to do is to have it put down.


    This pet is destroying your evolution fantasy with science and
    philosophy. And you can't do a thing to stop it.

    Thank you, aaa. Evolution has never been able to explain complex biological
    processes, such as the life cycle of the malarial mosquito. Neither has it
    ever been able to explain obvious intelligently engineered designs, such as
    the morphology of the tapeworm. (Also, no evolutionist is able to
    adequately explain why are there still monkeys.)

    That's easy. It's called a split.

    And yet splits are intelligently designed. (Although one might reasonably >>>> argue that it's hardly intelligent to consume so many naked carbohydrate >>>> calories at one sitting.)

    Maybe you should consider that the split produced 2 parallel lines. You're >>> trying to make a monkey out of a molehill.

    Aha! You can't explain how molehills evolved either!

    Of course I can. The wee creatures.

    Oh yeah.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)