On 04/02/2017 06:53 AM, felix wrote:
On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 5:11 PM, Ned Latham wrote:
Pelican wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:As an abstract, it's like polytheism: just plain silly. However, I
Pelican wrote:Monotheism is the same - neither good or evil.
Ned Latham wrote:Your point escapes me. Marxism isn't good or evil (though its
felix wrote:Are you suggesting that Marxism has gone past its useby
Ned Latham wrote:Yes. Peace is good. Love is good. Truth is good.
Then "duke" added his idiocy:however, there is good and evil
Ned Latham wrote:There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupidMr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as
a god.
shortly.
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and
inculcates mass delusion.
And the three monotheisms (Judaism, Christianty and Islam)
are the most evil creeds on the planet, because they add
institutionalised bigotry to the mix.
date?
perversions are definitely evil); neither is it religion. If
you're asking whether people should stop believing in it, the
answer is yes; If you're asking whether it should be discarded,
the answer is no.
did not speak of monotheism as a general concept; I spoke of three
specific monotheist cults: Judaism, Christiamity, and Islam.
the Christian God is in three parts, Father, Son, and Holy
Ghost/Spirit- the Trinity
you meant to say the only god . im right
All three are organised religions, which is to say they demand and
inculcate the delusions they've developed. And that is evil.
Moreover, their insistence on a one god ideology is
institutionalised bigotry: a wellspring of fear, suspicion and
hatred at the very core of their dogma. It is the genesis of the
genocides that all three are guilty of.
Those pushing one of its perversions via organised religion areEven pure, if it's organised, it's evil.
another matter.
Ned
Ned Retard wrote:
Humanism isn't a religion, Loser.
it doesnt have to be
Ned Latham wrote:
And now more duke puke:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious
crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Bet you a thousand dollars to a donut hole there is.
You're on, moron. Prove it and win your donut hole.
we knew you couldnt back up your claim liar
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
felix wrote:
Pelican wrote:
----snip----
Think whatever you like, but the NT was not exactly written
contemporaneously with the life of Jesus, and what Jesus
actually said and what he actually meant is subject to
whatever a writer chose to write.
Well, no: the *recoird* of what he said and meant.
yes, and so you cannot assert what view(s) Jesus held or not.
Actually, we can. The gospels actually make sense if you accept
them as Essene propaganda, aimed at distracting the Romans from
the reality behind the events recorded so as to hide the fact of
the impending revolution. (Historians call it the First Jewish
War. It ended at Masada, in 73 CE.)
As an Essene, Jeshua bar Joshiph believed that the Roman Empire
was idolatrous: an evil thing that must be extirpated from
Creation, and that the Jews should live under the "Kingdom of
God", which was to be a theocracy ruled by the Laws of Deuteronomy.
Sort of an ancient Jewish equivalent of modern Islam's Caliphate
and Sharia Law. (And the Essenes were like ISIL ... Brrr!)
----snip----
Pelican wrote:
Think whatever you like, but the NT was not exactly written contemporaneously with the life of Jesus, and what Jesus
actually said and what he actually meant is subject to
whatever a writer chose to write.
yes, and so you cannot assert what view(s) Jesus held or not.
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Pelican wrote:
----snip----
Think whatever you like, but the NT was not exactly written contemporaneously with the life of Jesus, and what Jesus
actually said and what he actually meant is subject to
whatever a writer chose to write.
Well, no: the *recoird* of what he said and meant.
yes, and so you cannot assert what view(s) Jesus held or not.
Actually, we can. The gospels actually make sense if you accept
them as Essene propaganda, aimed at distracting the Romans from
the reality behind the events recorded so as to hide the fact of
the impending revolution. (Historians call it the First Jewish
War. It ended at Masada, in 73 CE.)
As an Essene, Jeshua bar Joshiph believed that the Roman Empire
was idolatrous: an evil thing that must be extirpated from
Creation, and that the Jews should live under the "Kingdom of
God", which was to be a theocracy ruled by the Laws of Deuteronomy.
Sort of an ancient Jewish equivalent of modern Islam's Caliphate
and Sharia Law. (And the Essenes were like ISIL ... Brrr!)
That's strong stuff you are smoking!
On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 11:33 PM, Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:As I said, felix, "you can 'personify' the source of good too, and what
felix wrote:Yep. God.
Ned Latham wrote:You can "personify" the source of good too
felix wrote:Satan can be considered as a concept to personify the source of evil
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:however, there is good and evil
Ned Latham wrote:There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious crap: >>>>>>>>>>Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
you've got is an opening for the theists to drive their trucks through".
They're lunatics. You should *never* give them an opening.
and none can answer the question why a loving God allows human
suffering,
and in fact instigated it by creating humans (according to
the belief) and leaving them to fend for themselves
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Yes.
And evil (satan) is the opposite of love (God).There's no such thing as a god, dimwit.
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and inculcates mass
delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
That's to be expected from lunatics.
And the three monotheisms (Judaism, Christianty and Islam) are the mostWell, there goes your intelligence factor.
evil creeds on the planet, because they add institutionalised bigotry
to the mix.
Wrong pronoun, moron.
On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 10:59 PM, duke wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 21:16:22 GMT, Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> >> wrote:
felix wrote:And evil (satan) is the opposite of love (God).
Ned Latham wrote:Yes.
Then "duke" added his idiocy:however, there is good and evil
Ned Latham wrote:There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious crap:Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and inculcates massBelieve me, we freely choose to accept.
delusion.
it's called faith because there is no proof,
and it exposes you to all
sorts of manipulations, because there's no way of proving what is right
or wrong when rationality and facts are not the basis of belief
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
I believe that there was a man named Jeshua bar Joshiph who was an
Essene swordman (that's the ancient Hebrew equivalent of the modern
Islamist suicide bomber), who was on a mission to assassinate the
Chief Priest, and was caught, armed and at night, skulking in the
grounds of his residence, handed over to the Romans, and sentenced
to death and executed in the normal manner for that crime.
The "gospels" are Essene propaganda, written to keep the Romans
ignorant of the organization that was building up for another
attempt at evicting them, but if you read them carefully, you
can see the details that reveal the truth. For example, we know
that they were armed when caught, because "Peter" cut off a
guard's ear. And we know too, that the leader of the group wasn't
Jeshua, it was Barabbas; that's evident in his "name" which is
in reality a title, not a name: it is, in fact, "bar Abba", an
Aramaic title meaning "son of the father". And from the Dead Sea
scrolls we know "Kingdom of God" was code for the Theocracy the
Essenes wanted to establish. Sort of like the ISIL Caliphate.
So my opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
Yep, you live in oz for sure.
And you in La-la-land.
On 02/04/2017 02:37, & wrote:
On 04/01/2017 06:22 PM, Ted wrote:
Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
why are you bad excuse for troll
& is an infamous and anonymous internet troll.
And now more duke puke:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Bet you a thousand dollars to a donut hole there is.
You're on, moron. Prove it and win your donut hole.
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Yes.
And evil (satan) is the opposite of love (God).
There's no such thing as a god, dimwit.
Well, not in your world.
But you'll cry when you die.
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and
inculcates mass delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
That's to be expected from lunatics.
I win, you lose if I'm correct. You don't stand a chance.
And the three monotheisms (Judaism, Christianty and Islam)
are the most evil creeds on the planet, because they add institutionalised bigotry to the mix.
Well, there goes your intelligence factor.
Wrong pronoun, moron.
So is 3-religion creed, moron.
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote
some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Satan can be considered as a concept to personify the
source of evil
You can "personify" the source of good too
Yep. God.
As I said, felix, "you can 'personify' the source of good too,
and what you've got is an opening for the theists to drive their
trucks through". They're lunatics. You should *never* give them
an opening.
and none can answer the question why a loving God allows human
suffering,
Ask yourself why God let's us die, and you get the same answer
for suffering.
and in fact instigated it by creating humans (according to
the belief) and leaving them to fend for themselves
You sound like a child.
*****
"Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted wrote:
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
I believe that there was a man named Jeshua bar Joshiph who was an Essene swordman (that's the ancient Hebrew equivalent of the modern Islamist suicide bomber), who was on a mission to assassinate the
Chief Priest, and was caught, armed and at night, skulking in the grounds of his residence, handed over to the Romans, and sentenced
to death and executed in the normal manner for that crime.
The "gospels" are Essene propaganda, written to keep the Romans ignorant of the organization that was building up for another
attempt at evicting them, but if you read them carefully, you
can see the details that reveal the truth. For example, we know
that they were armed when caught, because "Peter" cut off a
guard's ear. And we know too, that the leader of the group wasn't Jeshua, it was Barabbas; that's evident in his "name" which is
in reality a title, not a name: it is, in fact, "bar Abba", an
Aramaic title meaning "son of the father". And from the Dead Sea scrolls we know "Kingdom of God" was code for the Theocracy the
Essenes wanted to establish. Sort of like the ISIL Caliphate.
So my opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
Yep, you live in oz for sure.
And you in La-la-land.
And not only that, but I'm on the right side.
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
felix wroye:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then puke added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Yes.
And evil (satan) is the opposite of love (God).
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and inculcates
mass delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
it's called faith because there is no proof,
Yet we have massive evidence.
and it exposes you to all sorts of manipulations, because
there's no way of proving what is right or wrong when
rationality and facts are not the basis of belief
Thanks be to God
for the evidence in rationality and facts.
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Ned Latham wrote:
And now more duke puke:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Bet you a thousand dollars to a donut hole there is.
You're on, moron. Prove it and win your donut hole.
I have the evidence. What do you have?
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
You can always stop answering, Loser.
Amper Sand the Great wrote:
Ned Latham the Loser wrote:
Ted wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious
crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a
god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
I believe that there was a man named Jeshua bar Joshiph who was
an Essene swordman (that's the ancient Hebrew equivalent of the
modern Islamist suicide bomber), who was on a mission to
assasinate the Chief Priest, and was caught, armed and at night,
skulking in the grounds of his residence, handed over to the
Romans, and sentenced to death and executed in the normal manner
for that crime.
The "gospels" are Essene propaganda, written to keep the Romans
ignorant of the organization that was building up for another
attempt at evicting them, but if you read them carefully, you can
see the details that reveal the truth. For example, we know that
they were armed when caught, because "Peter" cut off a guard's
ear. And we know too, that the leader of the group wasn't Jeshua,
it was Barabbas; that's evident in his "name" which is in reality
a title, not a name: it is, in fact, "bar Abba", an Aramaic title
meaning "son of the father". And from the Dead Sea scrolls we
know "Kingdom of God" was code for the Theocracy the Essenes
wanted to establish. Sort of like the ISIL Caliphate.
So mu opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
all crap
Too late, Loser: we already did that.
All get ready to smile when the Loser puts his hat on.
On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 11:33 PM, Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:As I said, felix, "you can 'personify' the source of good too, and
felix wrote:Yep. God.
Ned Latham wrote:You can "personify" the source of good too
felix wrote:Satan can be considered as a concept to personify the source
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:however, there is good and evil
Ned Latham wrote:There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupidMr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as
a god.
shortly.
of evil
what you've got is an opening for the theists to drive their trucks
through". They're lunatics. You should *never* give them an
opening.
and none can answer the question why a loving God allows human
suffering, and in fact instigated it by creating humans (according
to the belief) and leaving them to fend for themselves
***** "[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI *****
On 3/04/2017 11:33, felix wrote:
On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 9:15 PM, Pelican wrote:
On 2/04/2017 20:53, felix wrote:
On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 5:11 PM, Ned Latham wrote:
Pelican wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:As an abstract, it's like polytheism: just plain silly.
Pelican wrote:Monotheism is the same - neither good or evil.
Ned Latham wrote:Your point escapes me. Marxism isn't good or evil (though
felix wrote:Are you suggesting that Marxism has gone past its useby
Ned Latham wrote:Yes. Peace is good. Love is good. Truth is good.
Then "duke" added his idiocy:however, there is good and evil
Ned Latham wrote:There's no such thing as as a satan either,
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote someMr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such
thing as a god.
shortly.
moron.
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and
inculcates mass delusion.
And the three monotheisms (Judaism, Christianty and
Islam) are the most evil creeds on the planet,
because they add institutionalised bigotry to the
mix.
date?
its perversions are definitely evil); neither is it
religion. If you're asking whether people should stop
believing in it, the answer is yes; If you're asking
whether it should be discarded, the answer is no.
However, I did not speak of monotheism as a general concept;
I spoke of three specific monotheist cults: Judaism,
Christiamity, and Islam.
the Christian God is in three parts, Father, Son, and Holy
Ghost/Spirit- the Trinity
The Christian god is the same god as the Jewish god and the
Islamic god. The trinity is just some nonsense invented by one
organised religious group of Christians - it is not accepted by
all Christians,
it's the belief of all the major christian denominations afaik
The "major" ones, eh? Religion is a democracy in your view?
The unfortunate facts is that Jesus didn't ever run that line, and
neither the Jews or the Moslems swallow that nonsense.
and exists only to make some sense of one peculiar and idiotic
view of Jesus Christ. It is a view Jesus apparently didn't hold
about himself.
not so sure about that. I think you would find the NT refers to
Jesus talking about the father and the holy ghost
Think whatever you like, but the NT was not exactly written
contemporaneously with the life of Jesus, and what Jesus actually
said and what he actually meant is subject to whatever a writer chose
to write. There is some nonsense in there. Well, quite a lot.
Unless you are one of those nutters who believes in the NT
literally.
All three are organised religions, which is to say they
demand and inculcate the delusions they've developed. And
that is evil.
Moreover, their insistence on a one god ideology is
institutionalised bigotry: a wellspring of fear, suspicion
and hatred at the very core of their dogma. It is the genesis
of the genocides that all three are guilty of.
Those pushing one of its perversions via organised religionEven pure, if it's organised, it's evil.
are another matter.
Ned
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:Well, not in your world.
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Yes.
And evil (satan) is the opposite of love (God).
There's no such thing as a god, dimwit.
Unlike you, I'm not insane enough to suppose that people inhabit
their own worlds.
There is no such thing as a god. Full stop.
But you'll cry when you die.
And with the representative of the so-called "religion of love"
reveals his true colour.
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and
inculcates mass delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
That's to be expected from lunatics.
I win, you lose if I'm correct. You don't stand a chance.
I stand exactly the same chance as you, lunatic.
So is 3-religion creed, moron.Wrong pronoun, moron.And the three monotheisms (Judaism, Christianty and Islam)
are the most evil creeds on the planet, because they add
institutionalised bigotry to the mix.
Well, there goes your intelligence factor.
There's no such thing, lunatic: I said "creeds".
And even if I'd
said "creed", "wrong pronoun", would have been the wrong criticism.
Get yourself off to those Remedial English classes I keep having
to recommend to you semiliterate clowns.
puke wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote
some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Satan can be considered as a concept to personify the
source of evil
You can "personify" the source of good too
Yep. God.
As I said, felix, "you can 'personify' the source of good too,
and what you've got is an opening for the theists to drive their
trucks through". They're lunatics. You should *never* give them
an opening.
and none can answer the question why a loving God allows human
suffering,
Ask yourself why God let's us die, and you get the same answer
for suffering.
As I said, felix, they're lunatics. Can you imagine anyone crazier
than the kind if nutjob who comforts himself with a sadistic sky
fairy, a figment of some other nutjob's imagination?
and in fact instigated it by creating humans (according to
the belief) and leaving them to fend for themselves
You sound like a child.
So says the bedtime-story lunatic.
puke wrote:
felix wroye:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then puke added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Yes.
And evil (satan) is the opposite of love (God).
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and inculcates
mass delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
THat's to be expected from lunatics.
it's called faith because there is no proof,Yet we have massive evidence.
You need Remedial Mathematics as well as Remedial Ebglish. Come
back to us when you've understood that "zero" does not equate
to "massive".
and it exposes you to all sorts of manipulations, because
there's no way of proving what is right or wrong when
rationality and facts are not the basis of belief
Thanks be to God
There's no such thing, lunatic.
for the evidence in rationality and facts.
"Evidence of", moron. And it's of your lunacy, you cretin.
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted wrote:
----snip----
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
I believe that there was a man named Jeshua bar Joshiph who was an
Essene swordman (that's the ancient Hebrew equivalent of the modern
Islamist suicide bomber), who was on a mission to assassinate the
Chief Priest, and was caught, armed and at night, skulking in the
grounds of his residence, handed over to the Romans, and sentenced
to death and executed in the normal manner for that crime.
The "gospels" are Essene propaganda, written to keep the Romans
ignorant of the organization that was building up for another
attempt at evicting them, but if you read them carefully, you
can see the details that reveal the truth. For example, we know
that they were armed when caught, because "Peter" cut off a
guard's ear. And we know too, that the leader of the group wasn't
Jeshua, it was Barabbas; that's evident in his "name" which is
in reality a title, not a name: it is, in fact, "bar Abba", an
Aramaic title meaning "son of the father". And from the Dead Sea
scrolls we know "Kingdom of God" was code for the Theocracy the
Essenes wanted to establish. Sort of like the ISIL Caliphate.
So my opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
Yep, you live in oz for sure.
And you in La-la-land.
And not only that, but I'm on the right side.
That's one of the evidences of your bigotry, you lunatic.
That nasty "them and us" mentality you share with Jews and Muslims.
There are no sides; only people, whom *your* bigotry has condemned
to lives of misery and want.
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
And now more duke puke:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Bet you a thousand dollars to a donut hole there is.
You're on, moron. Prove it and win your donut hole.
I have the evidence. What do you have?
Your display of empty bravado; in effect, a confession that you can't
show *anything* in support of your delusory nonsense.
On 04/02/2017 06:13 PM, Ned Latham wrote:
Amper Sand the Great wrote:
Ned Latham the Loser wrote:
Ted wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious
crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a
god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
I believe that there was a man named Jeshua bar Joshiph who was
an Essene swordman (that's the ancient Hebrew equivalent of the
modern Islamist suicide bomber), who was on a mission to
assasinate the Chief Priest, and was caught, armed and at night,
skulking in the grounds of his residence, handed over to the
Romans, and sentenced to death and executed in the normal manner
for that crime.
The "gospels" are Essene propaganda, written to keep the Romans
ignorant of the organization that was building up for another
attempt at evicting them, but if you read them carefully, you can
see the details that reveal the truth. For example, we know that
they were armed when caught, because "Peter" cut off a guard's
ear. And we know too, that the leader of the group wasn't Jeshua,
it was Barabbas; that's evident in his "name" which is in reality
a title, not a name: it is, in fact, "bar Abba", an Aramaic title
meaning "son of the father". And from the Dead Sea scrolls we
know "Kingdom of God" was code for the Theocracy the Essenes
wanted to establish. Sort of like the ISIL Caliphate.
So mu opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
all crap
Too late, Loser: we already did that.
obviously youre still not done loser
All get ready to smile when the Loser puts his hat on.
when did you buy a hat loser
Amper Sande the Loser wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
So mu opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
all crap
Too late, Loser: we already did that.
obviously youre still not done loser
All get ready to smile when the Loser puts his hat on.
when did you buy a hat loser
This nl dude is nuts.
*****
"[Rutual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
And now more duke puke:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Bet you a thousand dollars to a donut hole there is.
You're on, moron. Prove it and win your donut hole.
I have the evidence. What do you have?
Your display of empty bravado; in effect, a confession that you can't
show *anything* in support of your delusory nonsense.
Where's your evidence that I'm engaging in delusory nonsense?
You're just praying to your god that you're right.
Guess what - you aren't.
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote
some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Satan can be considered as a concept to personify the
source of evil
You can "personify" the source of good too
Yep. God.
As I said, felix, "you can 'personify' the source of good too,
and what you've got is an opening for the theists to drive their trucks through". They're lunatics. You should *never* give them
an opening.
and none can answer the question why a loving God allows human suffering,
Ask yourself why God let's us die, and you get the same answer
for suffering.
As I said, felix, they're lunatics. Can you imagine anyone crazier
than the kind if nutjob who comforts himself with a sadistic sky
fairy, a figment of some other nutjob's imagination?
and in fact instigated it by creating humans (according to
the belief) and leaving them to fend for themselves
You sound like a child.
So says the bedtime-story lunatic.
Haahaahaa. An atheist that thinks he can fend off death.
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
There's no such thing as a god, dimwit.
Well, not in your world.
Unlike you, I'm not insane enough to suppose that people
inhabit their own worlds.
You do,
and it's full of God's love.
Prepare thyself for God's judgment.
But you'll cry when you die.
And with the representative of the so-called "religion of love"
reveals his true colour.
You surprise is the result of your own decision,
which will turn out to be wrong.
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and
inculcates mass delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
That's to be expected from lunatics.
I win, you lose if I'm correct. You don't stand a chance.
I stand exactly the same chance as you, lunatic.
Well, yes. We will both die and then stand before God in judgment.
And the three monotheisms (Judaism, Christianty and Islam)
are the most evil creeds on the planet, because they add institutionalised bigotry to the mix.
So is 3-religion creed, moron.Well, there goes your intelligence factor.Wrong pronoun, moron.
There's no such thing, lunatic: I said "creeds".
I know. That's why you're wrong.
Christians have a creed.
At least as far as I know, the other two don't.
Maybe you know something I don't.
And even if I'd said "creed", "wrong pronoun",
would have been the wrong criticism.
You got caught with your pants down around your ankles.
Get yourself off to those Remedial English classes I keep having
to recommend to you semiliterate clowns.
You're digging your hole deeper.
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
felix wroye:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then puke added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Yes.
And evil (satan) is the opposite of love (God).
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and inculcates
mass delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
THat's to be expected from lunatics.
Then you clueless to our creed.
it's called faith because there is no proof,Yet we have massive evidence.
You need Remedial Mathematics as well as Remedial Ebglish. Come
back to us when you've understood that "zero" does not equate
to "massive".
Ebglish??? Oh, and btw, we have evidence galore.
Just because you're blind does not affect us.
and it exposes you to all sorts of manipulations, because
there's no way of proving what is right or wrong when
rationality and facts are not the basis of belief
Thanks be to God
There's no such thing, lunatic.
You're just blind.
for the evidence in rationality and facts.
"Evidence of", moron. And it's of your lunacy, you cretin.
If you opened your eyes, you'd see what we see.
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
See, you can't even grasp that we don't have ritual cannibalism.
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted wrote:
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
I believe that there was a man named Jeshua bar Joshiph who was
an
Essene swordman (that's the ancient Hebrew equivalent of the
modern
Islamist suicide bomber), who was on a mission to assassinate
the
Chief Priest, and was caught, armed and at night, skulking in
the
grounds of his residence, handed over to the Romans, and
sentenced
to death and executed in the normal manner for that crime.
The "gospels" are Essene propaganda, written to keep the Romans ignorant of the organization that was building up for another
attempt at evicting them, but if you read them carefully, you
can see the details that reveal the truth. For example, we know
that they were armed when caught, because "Peter" cut off a
guard's ear. And we know too, that the leader of the group
wasn't
Jeshua, it was Barabbas; that's evident in his "name" which is
in reality a title, not a name: it is, in fact, "bar Abba", an
Aramaic title meaning "son of the father". And from the Dead Sea scrolls we know "Kingdom of God" was code for the Theocracy the
Essenes wanted to establish. Sort of like the ISIL Caliphate.
So my opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
Yep, you live in oz for sure.
And you in La-la-land.
And not only that, but I'm on the right side.
*****
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
felix wroye:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then puke added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Yes.
And evil (satan) is the opposite of love (God).
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and inculcates
mass delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
THat's to be expected from lunatics.
Then you clueless to our creed.
it's called faith because there is no proof,Yet we have massive evidence.
You need Remedial Mathematics as well as Remedial Ebglish. Come
back to us when you've understood that "zero" does not equate
to "massive".
Ebglish??? Oh, and btw, we have evidence galore.
Just because you're blind does not affect us.
and it exposes you to all sorts of manipulations, because
there's no way of proving what is right or wrong when
rationality and facts are not the basis of belief
Thanks be to God
There's no such thing, lunatic.
You're just blind.
for the evidence in rationality and facts.
"Evidence of", moron. And it's of your lunacy, you cretin.
If you opened your eyes, you'd see what we see.
"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
See, you can't even grasp that we don't have ritual cannibalism.
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
There's no such thing as a god, dimwit.
Well, not in your world.
Unlike you, I'm not insane enough to suppose that people
inhabit their own worlds.
You do,
and it's full of God's love.
Prepare thyself for God's judgment.
But you'll cry when you die.
And with the representative of the so-called "religion of love"
reveals his true colour.
You surprise is the result of your own decision,
which will turn out to be wrong.
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and
inculcates mass delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
That's to be expected from lunatics.
I win, you lose if I'm correct. You don't stand a chance.
I stand exactly the same chance as you, lunatic.
Well, yes. We will both die and then stand before God in judgment.
And the three monotheisms (Judaism, Christianty and Islam)
are the most evil creeds on the planet, because they add institutionalised bigotry to the mix.
So is 3-religion creed, moron.Well, there goes your intelligence factor.Wrong pronoun, moron.
There's no such thing, lunatic: I said "creeds".
I know. That's why you're wrong.
Christians have a creed.
At least as far as I know, the other two don't.
Maybe you know something I don't.
And even if I'd said "creed", "wrong pronoun",
would have been the wrong criticism.
You got caught with your pants down around your ankles.
Get yourself off to those Remedial English classes I keep having
to recommend to you semiliterate clowns.
You're digging your hole deeper.
duke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
----snip----
There's no such thing as a god, dimwit.
Well, not in your world.
Unlike you, I'm not insane enough to suppose that people
inhabit their own worlds.
You do,
We a;; inhabit just the one. lunatuc.
and it's full of God's love.
There's no such thing as a god.
Prepare thyself for God's judgment.
And the kunatic contradicts himseld tey again. Quelle surprise.
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote
some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Satan can be considered as a concept to personify the
source of evil
You can "personify" the source of good too
Yep. God.
As I said, felix, "you can 'personify' the source of good too,
and what you've got is an opening for the theists to drive their
trucks through". They're lunatics. You should *never* give them
an opening.
and none can answer the question why a loving God allows human
suffering,
Ask yourself why God let's us die, and you get the same answer
for suffering.
As I said, felix, they're lunatics. Can you imagine anyone crazier
than the kind if nutjob who comforts himself with a sadistic sky
fairy, a figment of some other nutjob's imagination?
and in fact instigated it by creating humans (according to
the belief) and leaving them to fend for themselves
You sound like a child.
So says the bedtime-story lunatic.
Haahaahaa. An atheist that thinks he can fend off death.
Says the lunatic who thinks a sky fairy's gonna save him from it.
Larf.
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
felix wroye:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
felix wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then puke added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
however, there is good and evil
Yes.
And evil (satan) is the opposite of love (God).
Organised religion is evil, because it demands and inculcates
mass delusion.
Believe me, we freely choose to accept.
THat's to be expected from lunatics.
Then you clueless to our creed.
No. I despise it.
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted wrote:
----snip----
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
I believe that there was a man named Jeshua bar Joshiph who was
an
Essene swordman (that's the ancient Hebrew equivalent of the
modern
Islamist suicide bomber), who was on a mission to assassinate
the
Chief Priest, and was caught, armed and at night, skulking in
the
grounds of his residence, handed over to the Romans, and
sentenced
to death and executed in the normal manner for that crime.
The "gospels" are Essene propaganda, written to keep the Romans
ignorant of the organization that was building up for another
attempt at evicting them, but if you read them carefully, you
can see the details that reveal the truth. For example, we know
that they were armed when caught, because "Peter" cut off a
guard's ear. And we know too, that the leader of the group
wasn't
Jeshua, it was Barabbas; that's evident in his "name" which is
in reality a title, not a name: it is, in fact, "bar Abba", an
Aramaic title meaning "son of the father". And from the Dead Sea
scrolls we know "Kingdom of God" was code for the Theocracy the
Essenes wanted to establish. Sort of like the ISIL Caliphate.
So my opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
Yep, you live in oz for sure.
And you in La-la-land.
And not only that, but I'm on the right side.
That's one of the evidences of your bigotry, you lunatic. That
nasty "them and us" mentality you share with Jews and Muslims.
There are no sides; only people, whom *your* bigotry has condemned
to lives of misery and want.
puke wrote:
Amper Sande the Loser wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
----snip----
So mu opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
all crap
Too late, Loser: we already did that.
obviously youre still not done loser
All get ready to smile when the Loser puts his hat on.
when did you buy a hat loser
This nl dude is nuts.
Nah. It's just that you two fuckwits are too stupid to work out
the meaning of what I saiud.
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 16:11:59 GMT, Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
And now more duke puke:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Bet you a thousand dollars to a donut hole there is.
You're on, moron. Prove it and win your donut hole.
I have the evidence. What do you have?
Your display of empty bravado; in effect, a confession that you can't
show *anything* in support of your delusory nonsense.
Where's your evidence that I'm engaging in delusory nonsense?
Between your ears.
There's no such thing as a god.
Of course I'm not praying. That'd be as insane as you are.
Come on, little kid. Try growing up.
felix wrote:
Pelican wrote:
----snip----
Think whatever you like, but the NT was not exactly written
contemporaneously with the life of Jesus, and what Jesus actually
said and what he actually meant is subject to whatever a writer
chose to write.
Well, no: the *recoird* of what he said and meant.
yes, and so you cannot assert what view(s) Jesus held or not.
Actually, we can. The gospels actually make sense if you accept them
as Essene propaganda, aimed at distracting the Romans from the
reality behind the events recorded so as to hide the fact of the
impending revolution. (Historians call it the First Jewish War. It
ended at Masada, in 73 CE.)
As an Essene, Jeshua bar Joshiph believed that the Roman Empire was idolatrous: an evil thing that must be extirpated from Creation, and
that the Jews should live under the "Kingdom of God", which was to be
a theocracy ruled by the Laws of Deuteronomy.
Sort of an ancient Jewish equivalent of modern Islam's Caliphate and
Sharia Law. (And the Essenes were like ISIL ... Brrr!)
On 3/04/2017 13:24, felix wrote:
On Monday, 3 Apr 2017 1:10 PM, Pelican wrote:
On 3/04/2017 12:35, felix wrote:
On Monday, 3 Apr 2017 12:02 PM, Pelican wrote:
On 3/04/2017 11:33, felix wrote:
On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 9:15 PM, Pelican wrote:
On 2/04/2017 20:53, felix wrote:
On Sunday, 2 Apr 2017 5:11 PM, Ned Latham wrote:
Pelican wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:As an abstract, it's like polytheism: just plain
Pelican wrote:Monotheism is the same - neither good or evil.
Ned Latham wrote:Your point escapes me. Marxism isn't good or evil
felix wrote:Are you suggesting that Marxism has gone past
Ned Latham wrote:Yes. Peace is good. Love is good. Truth is
Then "duke" added his idiocy:however, there is good and evil
Ned Latham wrote:There's no such thing as as a satan
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wroteMr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to
some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no
such thing as a god.
visit you shortly.
either, moron.
good.
Organised religion is evil, because it
demands and inculcates mass delusion.
And the three monotheisms (Judaism,
Christianty and Islam) are the most evil
creeds on the planet, because they add
institutionalised bigotry to the mix.
its useby date?
(though its perversions are definitely evil);
neither is it religion. If you're asking whether
people should stop believing in it, the answer is
yes; If you're asking whether it should be
discarded, the answer is no.
silly. However, I did not speak of monotheism as a
general concept; I spoke of three specific monotheist
cults: Judaism, Christiamity, and Islam.
the Christian God is in three parts, Father, Son, and
Holy Ghost/Spirit- the Trinity
The Christian god is the same god as the Jewish god and
the Islamic god. The trinity is just some nonsense
invented by one organised religious group of Christians -
it is not accepted by all Christians,
it's the belief of all the major christian denominations
afaik
The "major" ones, eh?
yes. Catholics, Protestants, etc.,
Religion is a democracy in your view?
The unfortunate facts is that Jesus didn't ever run that
line,
so you say
and neither the Jews or the Moslems swallow that nonsense.
irrelevant
and exists only to make some sense of one peculiar and
idiotic view of Jesus Christ. It is a view Jesus
apparently didn't hold about himself.
not so sure about that. I think you would find the NT
refers to Jesus talking about the father and the holy
ghost
Think whatever you like, but the NT was not exactly written
contemporaneously with the life of Jesus, and what Jesus
actually said and what he actually meant is subject to
whatever a writer chose to write.
yes, and so you cannot assert what view(s) Jesus held or not.
Of course I can. If you accept that Jesus existed, and that he
was an ordinary man, it's quite easy to dismiss the metaphysical
nonsense but agree with his ethical position.
but you have no reference for his 'ethical position', or any
position. you say on the one hand that you can't rely on what the
NT says, but then rely on it to support what you claim to be fact
Don't be silly. Once you exclude the stuff which is not credible,
which is the same stuff that would be excluded from serious
discussion if it was reported as happening today, you are left with
his ethical position. You can do as you please with it in the same
way as you choose to deal with the reported ethical position of any
other historical figure.
See the next sentence.
That's the way people have progressed over the centuries in the
real world - get rid of the bull-shit and the merchants of
bull-shit, and move on.
puke wrote:
Amper Sande the Loser wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
----snip----
So mu opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus
the Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
all crap
Too late, Loser: we already did that.
obviously youre still not done loser
All get ready to smile when the Loser puts his hat on.
when did you buy a hat loser
This nl dude is nuts.
Nah. It's just that you two fuckwits are too stupid to work out the
meaning of what I saiud.
***** "[Rutual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI *****
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 21:42:55 -0400, & <ampersand.the.great@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 04/02/2017 06:13 PM, Ned Latham wrote:
Amper Sand the Great wrote:
Ned Latham the Loser wrote:
Ted wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as
a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
I believe that there was a man named Jeshua bar Joshiph who
was an Essene swordman (that's the ancient Hebrew equivalent
of the modern Islamist suicide bomber), who was on a mission
to assasinate the Chief Priest, and was caught, armed and at
night, skulking in the grounds of his residence, handed over
to the Romans, and sentenced to death and executed in the
normal manner for that crime.
The "gospels" are Essene propaganda, written to keep the
Romans ignorant of the organization that was building up for
another attempt at evicting them, but if you read them
carefully, you can see the details that reveal the truth. For
example, we know that they were armed when caught, because
"Peter" cut off a guard's ear. And we know too, that the
leader of the group wasn't Jeshua, it was Barabbas; that's
evident in his "name" which is in reality a title, not a
name: it is, in fact, "bar Abba", an Aramaic title meaning
"son of the father". And from the Dead Sea scrolls we know
"Kingdom of God" was code for the Theocracy the Essenes
wanted to establish. Sort of like the ISIL Caliphate.
So mu opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
all crap
Too late, Loser: we already did that.
obviously youre still not done loser
All get ready to smile when the Loser puts his hat on.
when did you buy a hat loser
This nl dude is nuts.
the dukester, American-American
***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI
*****
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 16:11:59 GMT, Ned Latham
<nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
And now more duke puke:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Bet you a thousand dollars to a donut hole there is.
You're on, moron. Prove it and win your donut hole.
I have the evidence. What do you have?
Your display of empty bravado; in effect, a confession that
you can't show *anything* in support of your delusory
nonsense.
Where's your evidence that I'm engaging in delusory nonsense?
Between your ears. There's no such thing as a god. Of course I'm
not praying. That'd be as insane as you are.
Come on, little kid. Try growing up.
He is grown up. He no longer believes in childish fairy tales.
Ted wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
puke wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
And now more duke puke:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing
as a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Bet you a thousand dollars to a donut hole there is.
You're on, moron. Prove it and win your donut hole.
I have the evidence. What do you have?
Your display of empty bravado; in effect, a confession that
you can't show *anything* in support of your delusory
nonsense.
Where's your evidence that I'm engaging in delusory nonsense?
Between your ears. There's no such thing as a god. Of course I'm
not praying. That'd be as insane as you are.
Come on, little kid. Try growing up.
He is grown up. He no longer believes in childish fairy tales.
no hes an atheist . i win
On 04/04/2017 07:50 AM, duke wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 21:42:55 -0400, & <ampersand.the.great@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 04/02/2017 06:13 PM, Ned Latham wrote:
Amper Sand the Great wrote:
Ned Latham the Loser wrote:
Ted wrote:
Ned Latham wrote:
Then "duke" added his idiocy:
Ned Latham wrote:
Ted and vojavoja and Patrick wrote some stupid
religious crap:
Don't be ridiculous, boys: there's no such thing as
a god.
Mr. satan, sir: Mr. Ned is coming to visit you
shortly.
There's no such thing as as a satan either, moron.
Why don't you believe in Jesus, Ned?
I believe that there was a man named Jeshua bar Joshiph who
was an Essene swordman (that's the ancient Hebrew equivalent
of the modern Islamist suicide bomber), who was on a mission
to assasinate the Chief Priest, and was caught, armed and at
night, skulking in the grounds of his residence, handed over
to the Romans, and sentenced to death and executed in the
normal manner for that crime.
The "gospels" are Essene propaganda, written to keep the
Romans ignorant of the organization that was building up for
another attempt at evicting them, but if you read them
carefully, you can see the details that reveal the truth. For
example, we know that they were armed when caught, because
"Peter" cut off a guard's ear. And we know too, that the
leader of the group wasn't Jeshua, it was Barabbas; that's
evident in his "name" which is in reality a title, not a
name: it is, in fact, "bar Abba", an Aramaic title meaning
"son of the father". And from the Dead Sea scrolls we know
"Kingdom of God" was code for the Theocracy the Essenes
wanted to establish. Sort of like the ISIL Caliphate.
So mu opinion is that Jesus the terrorist existed; Jesus the
Messiah did not.
And there's no such thing as a god.
all crap
Too late, Loser: we already did that.
obviously youre still not done loser
All get ready to smile when the Loser puts his hat on.
when did you buy a hat loser
This nl dude is nuts.
you are right hes probably a faggot
the dukester, American-American
***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI
*****
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 38:56:51 |
| Calls: | 6,648 |
| Files: | 12,193 |
| Messages: | 5,329,312 |