"Surajit A. Bose" rote in message news-
Now a sop for the unsubtle: don't slay me for saying above thatWhat falls under kauns is not to be defined just by succession of
"Strictly speaking, Madhukauns would not be considered a true Kauns. Narrowly defined, 'Kauns' implies an aaroh-avaroh of ga-ma-dha-ni". Yes,
I know that raagas like Pancham Malkauns and Sampoorna Malkauns exist. I also know that Kaushi-Kanada, Jog-Kauns, etc. cannot be described as permutations of the ga-ma-dha-ni sequence. That's why I threw in qualifiers like "strictly speaking", "would not be" (rather than
"isn't"), and "narrowly defined". Like all raaga families, Kauns is too complex to be summarized in a sentence or two. It needs somebody of the erudition of Dr Parikkar to do justice to the enthralling, widely disparate cluster of raagas that shelter under the Kauns umbrella: Harikauns, Suryakauns, Navakauns, Kaushi Dhani, Kaushikaranjani... hint, hint, Rajan, are you listening?
notes g-m-d-n. It is the chalan that marks it as such, as with any
other ragang. That chalan can be grasped in even with one or two
notes, since all the notes (definitely the key notes) in a ragang
carry it's signature. In Madhukauns n-S-g are done along the Kauns
a.ng - whereas S-g-M-P are done in the chalan of Madhuwanti. S-g-S
are enough to invoke Kauns.
To get more intricate the S-g-S in Jog-kauns is done along Jog a.ng
and less along the Kauns (jog g is a slightly higher shruti with a
different smaller andolan). In Jog-kauns Kauns (in particular
Chandrakauns) comes largely from d-N-S and already in S-g one starts
moving into Jog.
Praful
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 380 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 51:51:12 |
Calls: | 8,144 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 13,085 |
Messages: | 5,858,733 |