Vidyasankar Sundaresan <vidya> wrote:
The acala vINA, true to its name, is left untouched in the course of Bharata's
demonstration, once it has been tuned to shaDja grAma. It is the cala vINA that
gets retuned.
pps. Most lists of retro-fit ratio values to "Bharata's 22 Srutis" rely on a >perfect fifths cycle. But these lists also include values like 5/4 and 5/3 for
gAndhAra and dhaivata respectively. These numbers could not have come from a >pure fifths cycle, but this fact is rarely, if ever, appreciated by most modern
Indian writers.
It is evident from these works that the cycle of fifths was indeed used to tuneThe reason I am doubtful
the yAzh (harp-like?). Consonance and dissonance relationships between notes are described in terms of naTpu (friendship) and pakai (enmity). kural (shaDja)
and iLi (pancama) are said to be in naTpu. The process of taking repeated fifths is known in tamizh as iLikramam. The description of tuning pAlaiyAzh (equivalent to harikAmbhoji - khamAj) leaves no room for doubt that the cycle of fifths is used to tune the strings of the instrument. What is even more interesting is that there is evidence that the tamizh musicians also modified this cycle in the case of the kaikkiLai (= gAndhAra) and viLari (= dhaivata). This is done because the iLikramam would give a third that is dissonant with the tonic. aTiyArkunallar clearly describes the reduction of the pitch of the kaikkiLai (gAndhAra) to bring it into consonance with the tonic (kural), so that the pakai is removed and naTpu is re-established. The viLari (dhaivata) is
also correspondingly reduced, in order to be in naTpu with the reduced kaikkiLai. If we were to attach a simple ratio of integers to this verbal description, it is clear that only a value of 5/4 could be meant for the new, reduced kaikkiLai. The presence of the fifth harmonic is very pronounced, especially in vibrations of thick strings, and it is obvious that the reduction
of the kaikkiLai (gAndhAra) is to bring it in resonance with this harmonic. The
corresponding value for the reduced viLari (dhaivata) would then be 5/3. What strikes me in this description is that the modification of the cycle of fifths
is done not to maintain the consonance of the uzhai (madhyama), but that of the
kaikkiLai (gAndhAra). The consonance of the uzhai is ensured because the iLikramam is started from tAram (nishAda), so that uzhai is determined as the fifth of tAram and kural as the fifth of uzhai. It has always puzzled me that the notes in Indian references have always been reckoned from the nishAda. There is even a story that originally there were only six notes, and that the shaDja was introduced because it was given by Siva. It may be that the reckoning from nishAda is just a way of maintaining the consonance of the fourth even while determining notes using a cycle of fifths. On the other hand,
I haven't seen such an explicit description of gAndhAra consonance with shaDja
in any samskr.ta source. Of course, this does not mean that it wasn't recognized in practice.
about it is because unlike in Bharata's case, the tamizh sources do not mention
anything equivalent to a madhyama grAma.
There always remains the question of influence from the Greeks, which I won't go into now.
S. Vidyasankar
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 380 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 51:56:30 |
Calls: | 8,144 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 13,085 |
Messages: | 5,858,733 |